Guidelines On Quantitative Risk Assessments (Qra) PDF
Guidelines On Quantitative Risk Assessments (Qra) PDF
Guidelines On Quantitative Risk Assessments (Qra) PDF
INTRODUCTION
Under Section 26 of the Environmental Protection and Management Act, PCD may require
the owner/occupier of hazardous installations to conduct pollution/hazard/risk impact studies.
The purposes of the QRA are to:
i
ii
iii
iv
identify and quantify hazards and risks related to the transport, use and storage
of hazardous materials;
determine hazards/risks due to possible accident scenarios which will lead to
fire, explosion or toxic release;
recommend measures to be incorporated in the design and operation of the
plant to keep hazards/risks to as low a level as practical;
facilitate the development of emergency response plans to deal with all
possible accident scenarios.
Introduction
i
ii
iii
Hazard Identification
i
ii
iii
Consequence Analysis
i
For the facility, determine the hazard zones for possible accident scenarios
considering proposed safety systems / mitigation measures, using well
validated models
ii
iii
iv
v
For the road transport of hazardous materials in bulk, determine the worst case
(rupture) 3% fatality distance for both daytime and nighttime weather
conditions
State clearly in the report which models are used and the basis for their
selection.
Key assumptions made in the calculations shall be tabulated (see Annex 2)
Estimate the distance to each of the following criteria. Tabulate the results (see
Annex 2) and indicate the hazard zones of the worst credible scenario (WCS)
on a map of the site:
Hazard
Toxic
(see Notes 2)
Fire (Radiation)
Explosion (Overpressure)
Criteria
IDLH;
3% fatality (for a release duration of less that 30
minutes)
37.5kw/m2 and 4kw/m2;
3% fatality / 500 TDU (for a fire of less than 30
seconds) (see Notes 1)
5psi, 1psi and 0.5psi
Fireball zone
Atmospheric Stability
F
B
C
Frequency Analysis
i
ii
iii
Estimate the event frequency per year for credible accident scenarios based on
relevant historical failure frequencies. Tabulate the results (see Annex 2)
Provide references for the failure data and indicate the applicability of the
historical failure data to the actual items being considered. (see Notes 3)
The failure frequency/probability of proposed safety systems / mitigation
measures shall be tabulated. (see Annex 2)
Name the software package used for the risk summation and give a simple
description of the basic approach the software uses for the calculation.
Identify the key risk contributors
Establish the following Individual Risk (IR) contours, tabulate the results (see
Annex 2) and indicate the IR contours on a map of the site:
(a) 5x10-5 per year;
-6
(b) 5x10 per year; and
(c) 1x10-6 per year
That the following hazard zones / IR contour for credible scenarios are within
the plant site boundary:
a
b
c
ii
IR contours:
a
b
iii
iv
that the hazard zones for the worst credible scenario (WCS) does not
extend into residential areas
no high-rise developments within the fireball zone
QRA SUBMISSION
A copy of the QRA report shall be submitted to each of the following agencies for their
information and comments:
Remark
*For proposed development on JTCs land only.
OTHER REQUIREMENTS
i
ii
CONSULTANTS
i
Notes
1
For the purpose of emergency response planing, the consequence distances to TLV
and ERPG-2 shall also be determined under section 2.3 for all toxic gases.
ANNEX 1
CHEMICAL INVENTORY
Table 1:
Chemical
Table 2:
Chemical
2
3
4
Storage
Storage
Location
UN /
IMO
Hazard
Class
Major
Hazards1
Physical
Form2
Type of
Container3
Unit
Capacity
of
Container4
Max Qty
Stored
On-Site4
Transportation
From
To
Type of
Container3
Unit
Capacity
of
Container4
Max Qty
Transported
per trip4
No. of Unit
Containers
Transported
per trip
No. of
Trips per
year
ANNEX 2
TABULATION OF CONSEQUENCE, FREQUENCY & RISK RESULTS FOR ALL POSSIBLE ACCIDENT SCENARIOS
Accident
Scenario1
Release Rate
& Duration
(Description
in words)
Event1
Mass
Released
Toxic
Fire
(flash fire,
jetfire..etc)
Explosion
(BLEVE,
VCE..etc)
Consequence Distance2
1F
2B
3C
IDLH
3% Fatality
37.5 kW/m2
4 kW/m2
3% fatality
5psi
1psi
0.5psi
3% fatality
Event
Frequency
Key Assumptions
Safety/Mitigation
Measures3
all outcomes/events for each accident scenario for both storage and transport.
credible scenarios with off-site impacts shall be in bold font. The worst credible scenario shall be identified with the text "(WCS)"
3
including failure frequency/probability of proposed safety/mitigation measures and frequency/probability of human error
2
Maximum Distance to IR
Contour
Confirmation
That this contour remains on-site
That this contour extends into commercial and industrial developments only.
ANNEX 3
SALIENT FINDINGS OF THE QRA STUDY
1
Event Frequency
(per year)
Offsite Hazard
Distance 3
(m)
xE-y
x
(37.5kW/m2)
FIRE
Description
na
y
(4kW/m2)
TOXIC RELEASE
Description
xE-y
x
(IDLH)
xE-y
x
(5psi)
na
EXPLOSION
Description
na
y
(1psi)
z
(0.5psi)
Worst Credible Scenario2
Event Frequency
(per year)
Offsite Hazard
Distance 3
(m)
FIRE
Non-credible
No credible scenarios
TOXIC RELEASE
xE-y
Description
x
(3% fatality)
EXPLOSION
xE-y
Description
x
(5psi)
y
(1psi)
z
(0.5psi)
Individual Risk
Individual risk contours
Event Frequency
(per year)
Hazard Distance2
(m)
x
(3% fatality)
y
(4kW/m2)
Does not encroach into residential areas
or existing workers' dormitories
TOXIC RELEASE
Description
xE-y
x
(3% fatality)
Does not encroach into residential areas
or existing workers' dormitories
EXPLOSION
Description
xE-y
x
(3% fatality)
Event Frequency
(per year)
Hazard Distance3
(m)
FIRE
Description
xE-y
x
(3% fatality)
y
(37.5kW/m2)
z
(4kW/m2)
TOXIC RELEASE
Description
xE-y
x
(3% fatality)
EXPLOSION
Description
xE-y
x
(3% fatality)
y
(1 psi)
z
(0.5 psi)
1 scenario with frequency greater than 1E-6 per year and the largest hazard distance
2 measured from the edge of the road using most prevalent daytime and nighttime weather condition
3 using most prevalent daytime conditions (i.e. 2B or 3C)
ANNEX 4
LIST OF QRA CONSULTANTS
The updated list of QRA consultants can be found at our NEA website
http://www.nea.gov.sg/cms/pcd/qra_consultants.pdf
APPENDIX
SCHEMATIC OF QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS