F - Compact Cooler For Electronics On The Basis of A Pulsating Heat Pipe - 2009
F - Compact Cooler For Electronics On The Basis of A Pulsating Heat Pipe - 2009
F - Compact Cooler For Electronics On The Basis of A Pulsating Heat Pipe - 2009
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 14 April 2009
Accepted 3 June 2009
Available online 7 June 2009
Keywords:
Pulsating heat pipe
Electronics cooling
Heat load
Heat ux
Thermal resistance
a b s t r a c t
The paper presents the results of developing and investigating a compact cooler for electronics made on
the basis of a closed loop pulsating heat pipe (CLPHP). The cooler is made of a copper tube 5.6 m long with
OD of 2 mm and ID of 1.2 mm in the form a 3D spiral containing 17 turns. The device is equipped with a
light copper radiator with a nning area of 1670 cm2, which was blown by an axial fan located inside the
spiral. The thermal interface of the cooler situated in the heating zone is made of a copper plate with a
thermocontact surface measuring 40 35 mm, which was in thermal contact with all the turns of the
device. The cooler overall dimensions are 105 100 60 mm, its mass is 350 g.
The operation of the cooler has been investigated with water, methanol and R141b as working uids at
a uniform and concentrated supply of a heat load in different heating modes. A reliable operation of the
device has been demonstrated in the range of heat loads from 5 to 250 W. A minimum thermal resistance
heat sourceambient air equal to 0.32 C/W was attained with water and methanol as working uids at
a uniform heat load of 250 W. With a heat load concentrated on a section of the thermal interface limited
by an area of 1 cm2, a minimum value of thermal resistance equal to 0.62 C/W was attained at a heat
load of 125 W when methanol was used as a working uid.
2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Pulsating heat pipes (PHPs) [13] have taken up a prominent
place among highly efcient heat-transfer devices operating on a
closed evaporationcondensation cycle. In such characteristics as
heat-transfer capacity, thermal resistance, sensitivity to orientation in the gravity eld PHPs in some cases can approach conventional heat pipes, and the extreme simplicity of their design makes
them comparable to two-phase thermosyphons. However, PHPs
will evidently never be able to attain as high thermal efciency,
with comparable dimensions, as that of heat-transfer devices
whose operation is fully based on the use of the latent heat of
vaporization. In PHPs, where heat-transfer is realized at the expense of the chaotic motion of alternating vapor slugs and liquid
plugs, the latent heat of vaporization is used only partially. In this
sense such a brand as heat pipe refers to these devices rather
conventionally.
By their design PHPs may be divided into two main types: open
loop pulsating heat pipes (OLPHPs) and closed loop pulsating heat
pipes (CLPHPs) [4]. On the basis of well-known publications it is
difcult to draw an unambiguous conclusion as to which of these
two types of PHP is preferable. For instance, in Refs. [4,5] it is noted
that there is no considerable difference between these devices. At
the same time in Ref. [6] it is pointed out that OLPHPs with such
working uids as water, ethanol, FC-72 do not operate at all. Evi* Corresponding author. Tel.: +7 343 267 87 91; fax: +7 343 267 87 99.
E-mail address: maidanik@etel.ru (Y.F. Maydanik).
1359-4311/$ - see front matter 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2009.06.005
dcr < 2
q
r=ql g ;
dcr 2
q
r=ql qv g :
As a rule, the internal diameter of PHPs varies in the range from 0.5
to 3 mm and the number of turns is usually equal to 10 or more. The
3512
Nomenclature
CFM
dcr
FH
g
N
Q
qmax
RPM
R
TH
Tamb
r
ql
qv
3513
PHP
thermal
interface
heat sink
fan
Fig. 2. External view of a cooler on the basis of CLPHP.
Fig. 3. Cooler positions at different heating modes: a top heating mode, b side
heating mode, c bottom heating mode.
T H T air
:
Q
qmax
Q max
:
FH
The maximum value of heat load per PHP turn was determined as:
qmax
Q max
:
N
3514
minimum to the maximum one for the side heating mode. For
other heating modes these proles had a similar form.
In analyzing these results one, rst of all, pays attention to the
fact that the characteristics of temperature pulsations of the cooler
differ considerably depending on the working uid used. In particular, for water the amplitude of pulsations is much higher, and the
frequency lower than for methanol and R141b. It can also be seen
that with increasing heat load, when the temperature and the corresponding pressure in the PHP increase, the amplitude of pulsations decreases and the frequency increases. This is connected
with the fact that during the boiling of liquids at low pressures
250 W
110
225 W
100
200 W
175 W
150 W
Temperature, oC
90
80
125 W
100 W
70
50 W
75 W
60
50
25 W
10 W
40
30
20
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
120
250 W
110
225 W
100
200 W
90
Temperature, oC
6000
175 W
80
150 W
125 W
70
100 W
60
75 W
50 W
25 W
50
40
5W
10 W
30
20
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
190 W
110
180 W
100
160 W
Temperature, oC
90
150 W
125 W
80
70
100 W
25 W
60
75 W
20 W
15 W
50
50 W
10 W
40
5W
30
20
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Time, sec
Fig. 4. Temperature proles of the heater in the side heating mode: a water, b methanol, c R141b.
110
Temperature, oC
90
70
50
30
50
100
150
200
250
b 120
3515
caused by the fact that the operation and, consequently, the energy required for the formation of a viable vapor bubble depend
on the value of surface tension, which is higher for water than
for methanol and R141b [14]. Fig. 5 presents experimental values
of the average heater temperature depending on the heat load at
different heating modes.
These results show that despite the differences in the character
of pulsations the value of heat load at which a maximum temperature close to 100 C is achieved varies only slightly. For water and
methanol it is equal to 250 W, and for R141b to 190 W. The difference does not exceed 24%. Accordingly, differences are also observed in the minimum values of thermal resistance, which are
0.32 0.2 C/W for water and methanol and 0.42 0.2 C/W for
R141b.
The maximum heat load density attained in testing the cooler
under uniform heating of the thermal interface was 17.8 W/cm2
for water and methanol and 13.6 W/cm2 for R141b. As for the
heat load per turn, these values were equal respectively to
14.7 W/cm2 and 11.2 W/cm2. It is necessary to mention another
interesting effect, which was connected with the appearance of
a characteristic sound accompanying the PHP operation when
the working uid was water. That sound appeared at a heat load
of 75 W, and its frequency and intensity increased with increasing heat load. The sound effects were also accompanied by quite
noticeable mechanical vibrations of the cooler. From the laws of
acoustics it is known that any process that causes a local change
of pressure or a mechanical stress in an elastic medium may
serve as a sound source. Different hypotheses of the appearance
of noise during the boiling of a liquid are considered in Ref. [15].
One of them, in particular, points to the fact that the noise
source during boiling is pulsations of the volume of vapor bubbles causing a local compression and decompression of the surrounding liquid. It is not improbable that it is precisely such a
process that is observed in a PHP, which is aggravated by constraint conditions. When the device operated with methanol
and R141b, no sound effects were observed in the audible frequency range.
Temperature, oC
100
0
0
Temperature, oC
50
100
150
200
250
100
80
60
40
20
0
50
100
150
200
Heat load, W
Fig. 5. Heat load dependence of the average heater temperature: a water, b
methanol, c R141b.
3516
110
100 W
90 W
85 W
100
75 W
Temperature, oC
90
80
50 W
70
60
25 W
50
10 W
40
30
20
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
110
125 W
100
Temperature, oC
90
100 W
80
75 W
70
50 W
60
25 W
20 W
50
15 W
10 W
40
5W
30
20
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
110
100
100 W
Temperature, oC
90
80
75 W
70
50 W
60
25 W
20 W
50
10 W
40
15 W
5W
30
20
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Time, sec
Fig. 6. PHP temperature prole at concentrated heat load: a water, b methanol, c R141b.
with different working uids in the side heating mode, which have
similar form for other heating modes too.
Here it is seen that despite the local heat load supply temperature pulsations are observed in all PHP turns. In this case a temperature close to 100 C is achieved at a heat load of 125 W when the
working uid is methanol, which corresponds to a heat ux of
125 W/cm2. The value of the cooler thermal resistance in this case
is at a level of 0.62 C/W.
The heat load dependence of the heater average temperature at
concentrated heating, which is shown in Fig. 7, has a form similar
to that observed at uniform heating.
This dependence is of a linear character, and the effect of the
heating mode here is also insignicant.
6. Conclusions
1. A compact cooler made on the basis of a CLPHP has been tested
at uniform and concentrated heat loads with water, methanol
and R141b as working uids.
2. An efcient operation of the cooler has been demonstrated in
the top, side and bottom modes. At the top heating mode at a
concentrated heat load it was impossible to start-up the cooler
with water.
3. A maximum average temperature of the heater equal to
100 5 C was attained at a uniform heat load of 250 W when
water and methanol were used as working uids. For R141b
this value was 190 W. The corresponding values of heat ux
Temperature, oC
3517
were 17.8 W/cm2 and 13.6 W/cm2, and those of thermal resistance 0.32 C/W and 0.42 C/W. In this case no critical phenomena were observed in the heating zone.
4. With concentration of a heat load on a thermal interface area of
1 cm2 a maximum heat ux value equal to 125 W/cm2 was
achieved with methanol as a working uid.
5. The results of tests have shown that for the cooler under discussion the most suitable working uid is methanol, which ensures
its serviceability in the widest range of heat loads in all heating
modes at both uniform and concentrated heating.
110
90
70
50
30
0
Temperature, oC
20
40
60
80
100
120
References
100
80
60
40
20
0
Temperature, oC
20
40
60
80
100
120
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Heat load, W
Fig. 7. Heat load dependence of the cooler average temperature at concentrated
heating: a water, b methanol, c R141b.