HUAWEI 3900-LTE Security Target 2.6

Security Target of
Huawei 3900 Series LTE eNodeB Software
Version: 2.6
Last Update: 2011-10-17
Author: Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
Huawei 3900 Series LTE eNodeB Software Security Target
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ___________________________________________________________________8
1.1. ST Reference __________________________________________________________________8
1.2. TOE Reference_________________________________________________________________8
1.3. TOE Overview _________________________________________________________________8
1.3.1.TOE usage ____________________________________________________________________9
1.3.2.TOE type_____________________________________________________________________10
1.3.3.Non TOE Hardware and Software________________________________________________11
1.4. TOE Description ______________________________________________________________16
1.4.1.Logical Scope _________________________________________________________________16
1.4.2.Physical Scope ________________________________________________________________20
2. Conformance claim ____________________________________________________________22
3. Security Problem Definition _____________________________________________________23
3.1. TOE Assets ___________________________________________________________________23
3.2. Threats ______________________________________________________________________23
3.2.1.Threats by Eavesdropper _______________________________________________________24
3.2.2.Threats by Internal Attacker ____________________________________________________24
3.2.3.Threats by restricted authorized user _____________________________________________24
3.3. Organizational Policies _________________________________________________________25
3.3.1.P1.Audit _____________________________________________________________________25
3.3.2.P2.S1_Encryption _____________________________________________________________25
3.3.3.P3.X2_Encryption _____________________________________________________________25
3.3.4.P4.UU_Encryption_____________________________________________________________25
3.4. Assumptions __________________________________________________________________25
3.4.1.Physical ______________________________________________________________________25
3.4.2.Personnel ____________________________________________________________________25
3.4.3.Connectivity __________________________________________________________________26
3.4.4.Support ______________________________________________________________________26
3.4.5.SecurePKI____________________________________________________________________26
4. Security Objectives ____________________________________________________________27
4.1. Security Objectives for the TOE__________________________________________________27
4.2. Security Objectives for the Operational Environment ________________________________28
4.3. Security Objectives rationale ____________________________________________________28
4.3.1.Coverage _____________________________________________________________________28
4.3.2.Sufficiency ___________________________________________________________________29
5. Security Requirements for the TOE_______________________________________________32
5.1. Security Requirements _________________________________________________________32
5.1.1.Security Audit (FAU)___________________________________________________________32
5.1.1.1.
FAU_GEN.1 Audit data generation __________________________________________32
5.1.1.2.
FAU_GEN.2 User identity association ________________________________________32
5.1.1.3.
FAU_SAR.1 Audit review __________________________________________________33
5.1.1.4.
FAU_SAR.3 Selectable Audit review _________________________________________33
5.1.1.5.
FAU_STG.1 Protected audit trail storage _____________________________________33
5.1.1.6.
FAU_STG.3 Action in case of possible audit data loss ___________________________33
5.1.2.Cryptographic Support (FCS) ___________________________________________________33
5.1.2.1.
FCS_COP.1/Sign Cryptographic operation____________________________________33
-2-
5.1.2.2.
FCS_COP.1/SSL Cryptographic operation ____________________________________34
5.1.2.3.
FCS_COP.1/UU Cryptographic operation_____________________________________34
5.1.2.4.
FCS_COP.1/S1 Cryptographic operation _____________________________________34
5.1.2.5.
FCS_COP.1/X2 Cryptographic operation _____________________________________34
5.1.2.6.
FCS_CKM.1/SSL Cryptographic key generation _______________________________35
5.1.2.7.
FCS_CKM.1/UU Cryptographic key generation________________________________35
5.1.2.8.
FCS_CKM.1/S1 Cryptographic key generation ________________________________35
5.1.2.9.
FCS_CKM.1/X2 Cryptographic key generation ________________________________35
5.1.3.User Data Protection (FDP) _____________________________________________________35
5.1.3.1.
FDP_ACC.1/Local Subset access control ______________________________________35
5.1.3.2.
FDP_ACF.1/Local Security attribute based access control _______________________36
5.1.3.3.
FDP_ACC.1/Domain Subset access control ____________________________________36
5.1.3.4.
FDP_ACF.1/Domain Security attribute based access control _____________________36
5.1.3.5.
FDP_ACC.1/EMSCOMM Subset access control________________________________37
5.1.3.6.
FDP_ACF.1/EMSCOMM Security attribute based access control _________________37
5.1.4.Identification and Authentication (FIA) ___________________________________________38
5.1.4.1.
FIA_AFL.1 Authentication failure handling ___________________________________38
5.1.4.2.
FIA_ATD.1 User attribute definition _________________________________________38
5.1.4.3.
FIA_SOS.1 Verification of secrets ___________________________________________39
5.1.4.4.
FIA_UAU.1 Timing of authentication ________________________________________39
5.1.4.5.
FIA_UAU.5 Multiple authentication mechanisms_______________________________39
5.1.4.6.
FIA_UID.1 Timing of identification__________________________________________39
5.1.5.Security Management (FMT) ____________________________________________________40
5.1.5.1.
FMT_MSA.1 Management of security attributes _______________________________40
5.1.5.2.
FMT_MSA.3 Static attribute initialization ____________________________________40
5.1.5.3.
FMT_SMF.1 Specification of Management Functions ___________________________40
5.1.5.4.
FMT_SMR.1 Security roles_________________________________________________41
5.1.6.TOE access (FTA) _____________________________________________________________41
5.1.6.1.
FTA_TSE.1/SEP TOE session establishment___________________________________41
5.1.6.2.
FTA_TSE.1/Local TOE session establishment _________________________________41
5.1.7.Trusted Path/Channels (FTP)____________________________________________________42
5.1.7.1.
FTP_TRP.1/WebLMT Trusted path _________________________________________42
5.1.7.2.
FTP_ITC.1/IntegratedPort Inter-TSF trusted channel __________________________42
5.2. Security Functional Requirements Rationale _______________________________________42
5.2.1.Coverage _____________________________________________________________________42
5.2.2.Sufficiency ___________________________________________________________________44
5.2.3.Security Requirements Dependency Rationale ______________________________________45
5.3. Security Assurance Requirements ________________________________________________47
5.4. Security Assurance Requirements Rationale _______________________________________48
6. TOE Summary Specification ____________________________________________________49
6.1. TOE Security Functionality _____________________________________________________49
6.1.1.Authentication ________________________________________________________________49
6.1.2.Access control_________________________________________________________________49
6.1.3.Auditing _____________________________________________________________________51
6.1.4.Communications security _______________________________________________________51
6.1.5.UU Interface Encryption________________________________________________________52
6.1.6.S1 Interface Encryption ________________________________________________________52
6.1.7.X2 Interface Encryption ________________________________________________________53
-3-
6.1.8.Resource management__________________________________________________________53
6.1.9.Security function management ___________________________________________________54
6.1.10.
Digital Signature__________________________________________________________55
7. Abbreviations, Terminology and References________________________________________57
7.1. Abbreviations _________________________________________________________________57
7.2. Terminology __________________________________________________________________58
7.3. References____________________________________________________________________58
-4-
List of figures
Figure 1 LTE/SAE network __________________________________________________________11
Figure 2 BBU3900 subrack __________________________________________________________11
Figure 3 Non TOE hardware and software environment _________________________________12
Figure 4 Software architecture _______________________________________________________16
Figure 5 TOE Logical Scope_________________________________________________________17
-5-
List of tables
Table 1 Physical Scope _____________________________________________________________21
Table 2 TOE assets ________________________________________________________________23
Table 3 Threats agents _____________________________________________________________23
Table 4 Mapping of security objectives ________________________________________________29
Table 5 Sufficiency analysis for threats________________________________________________30
Table 6 Sufficiency analysis for assumptions___________________________________________30
Table 7 Sufficiency analysis for organizational security policy ____________________________31
Table 8 Mapping SFRs to objectives __________________________________________________43
Table 9 SFR sufficiency analysis _____________________________________________________45
Table 10 Dependencies between TOE Security Functional Requirements__________________47
Table 11 Security Assurance Requirements ___________________________________________48
-6-
Changes control
Version
Date
Author
Changes to previous version
V0.10
2010-12-13
Fangxiaolei
---
V1.3
2011-04-22
Songzhuo
Modify as suggestion as
expert adviser
V1.4
2011-05-05
Songzhuo
expert adviser
V1.5
2011-05-17
Songzhuo
expert adviser
V1.6
2011-05-26
Songzhuo
expert adviser
V1.7
2011-05-30
Songzhuo
expert adviser
V1.8
2011-05-31
Songzhuo
expert adviser
V1.9
2011-06-01
Songzhuo
expert adviser
V2.0
2011-06-01
Songzhuo
expert adviser
V2.1
2011-06-02
Songzhuo
expert adviser
V2.2
2011-06-08
Songzhuo
expert adviser
V2.3
2011-06-22
Liubin
Changed the word GRE into

SCTP
V2.4
2011-08-12
Jiang Liang
Modify according to ORs
V2.5
2011-09-01
Jiang Liang
V2.6
2011-10-17
Jiang Liang
-7-
1.
Introduction
This Security Target is for the CC evaluation of Huawei 3900 Series

LTE (Long Term Evolution) eNodeB Software, the TOE Version is
V100R004C00SPC100 and is based on Huawei HERT-BBU (Huawei
Enhanced Radio Technology-Base Band Unit) V2R7C01.
1.1.
ST Reference
Title
Version
Author
Publication Date
1.2.
Security Target of Huawei 3900 Series LTE

eNodeB Software
v2.6
Fang Xiaolei, Song Zhuo
2011-10-17
TOE Reference
TOE Name
TOE Version
TOE Developer
Huawei 3900 Series LTE eNodeB Software

(a.k.a. eNodeB)
V100R004C00SPC100
Huawei
1.3.
TOE Overview
3GPP Long Term Evolution (LTE), is the latest standard in the mobile
network technology tree that produced the GSM/EDGE and
UMTS/HSDPA network technologies. It is a project of the 3rd
Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), operating under a name
trademarked by one of the associations within the partnership, the
European Telecommunications Standards Institute.
The current generation of mobile telecommunication networks is

collectively known as 3G (for "third generation"). Although LTE is often
marketed as 4G, first-release LTE does not fully comply with the IMT
Advanced 4G requirements. The pre-4G standard is a step toward LTE
Advanced, a 4th generation standard (4G) of radio technologies
designed to increase the capacity and speed of mobile telephone
networks. LTE Advanced is backwards compatible with LTE and uses
the same frequency bands, while LTE is not backwards compatible with
3G systems.
Huawei 3900 series LTE eNodeB is the base station in LTE radio
networks. Its coverage and capacity are expanded through multiantenna technologies, its maintainability and testability are improved,
and thus it provides subscribers with the wireless broadband access
services of large capacity and high quality.
The ST contains a description of the security objectives and the

requirements, as well as the necessary functional and assurance
-8-
measures provided by the TOE. The ST provides the basis for the
evaluation of the TOE according to the Common Criteria for Information
Technology Security Evaluations (CC).
1.3.1. TOE usage

6
The TOE can be widely used to support the broadband wireless access
of home and enterprise users. Besides, it is used to support mobile
broadband access. In Huawei LTE solution, the TOE adopts a star
topology, in which the transmission equipment is directly connected to
the BS through FE or GE ports. The TOE networking supports various
access modes, including the FE, GE, optical fibber, x digital subscriber
line (xDSL), passive optical network (PON), microwave access, and
satellite.
The TOE possesses the following features:

1. Eight-antenna MIMO, increasing coverage with fewer sites;
2. High integration, reducing the overall size;
3. On an all-IP platform, thus supporting smooth upgrade;
4. Industry-leading technologies, delivering excellent performance;
5. Easy maintenance through the Web LMT; Flexible networking.
The major security features implemented by the TOE and subject to

evaluation are:
A.
Authentication
Operators using local access to the TOE in order to execute device

management functions are identified by individual user names and
authenticated by passwords.
10
Authenticated access through the integrated port is enforced using SSL

client authentication.
B.
11
The TOE implements role-based access control, limiting access to

different management functionality to different roles as defined in
administrator-defined access control associations.
C.
12
Access control
Auditing
Audit records are created for security-relevant events related to the use
of the TOE.
D.
Communications security
-9-
13
The TOE offers SSL/TLS channels for FTP, MML (man-machine

language, which is a kind of Command Line Interface), and BIN
(Huaweis private binary message protocol) access to the TOE.
E.
14
The TOE air interface support AES and SNOW 3G service data
encryption, which ensures the privacy of user session.
F.
15
S1 Interface encryption
The IPSec protocol is used in the communication with the MME/S-GW.

G.
16
UU Interface encryption
X2 Interface encryption
The IPSec protocol is used in the communication with other LTE

eNodeBs.
H.
Resource management
17
VLAN (Virtual Local Area Network) are implemented to separate the

traffic from different flow planes, which reduce traffic storms and avoid
resource overhead.
18
ACL (Access Control List) implements packet filtering features to

restrict resource use via IP address, ports, etc. Those features protect
the TOE against various unauthorized access from unauthorized NEs.
I.
19
The TOE offers management functionality for its security functionality.

J.
20
Security function management
Digital signature
In the production and distribution phases, the digital signature scheme,

protect the software package by message digest and signature.
1.3.2. TOE type

21
The TOE comprises management and control software that is deployed

into a LTE eNodeB base station. That software includes identification
and authentication, system access control, audit management,
enforcement of network transmission against data peeking,
management functionality to manage the security functions of LTE
eNodeB, and digital signature validation to guarantee the confidentiality
and integrity of the software packages that are deployed.
22
It complies with 3GPP standards. A LTE/SAE system consists of the

EPC Network/Backhaul Network/Radio Network/Terminal Network. The
LTE eNodeB provides subscribers with wireless broadband access
services of large capacity and high quality.
- 10 -
23
Figure 1 shows the position of the TOE in a LTE/SAE network.
Figure 1 LTE/SAE network

24
The UE/Terminal is the subscriber terminal in the LTE network. With

the UE/Terminal, the subscriber gains access to the services provided
by the operator and Service Network.
25
The eNB is LTE eNodeB, which provides wireless access service for
the UE/Terminal.
26
The EPC network is the Evolved Packet Core network and consists of
the MME (Mobility Management Entity), the SGW (Service Gateway)
and UGW (User plane Gateway). It performs functions such as mobility
management, IP connection, QoS management, and billing
management.
27
The NMS is Network Management System, which provides network

management to LTE eNodeB.
1.3.3. Non TOE Hardware and Software

28
The TOE runs into the BBU3900 subrack and in the RRU. The
structure of BBU3900 is shown in the following figure:
Figure 2 BBU3900 subrack

29
The BBU3900 contains, at least, the following mandatory boards:
The LTE Baseband Processing and radio Interface Unit (LBBI),

whose purpose is to provide an interface between BBU3900 and
Radio Remote Unit (RRU).
- 11 -
30
The LTE Main Processes and Transmission unit (LMPT), which is

the main board of BBU3900. It controls and manages the entire
BS system, provides clock synchronization signals for the BS
system and provides the S1/X2 interface for transmission.
The Universal Power and Environment Interface Unit (UPEU),

whose purpose is providing power to the whole BBU3900 subrack.
The FAN unit of the BBU3900 controls the fan speed, monitors the
temperature of the FAN unit, and dissipates the heat from the
BBU.
The TOE is LTE eNodeB software packages. It is deployed on the

boards of base band unit (BBU) and Remote Radio Unit (RRU). These
hardware boards are TOE environment. The OS and part of BS
software which is provided by Huaweis particular products are also
TOE environment.
Figure 3 Non TOE hardware and software environment

31
In the above diagram, the light blue box area belongs to the TOE while
the orange box area belongs to the TOE environment.
- 12 -
32
The components of the TOE environment are the following:
Physical networks, such as Ethernet subnets, interconnecting

various networking devices.
LTE eNodeB Operating System: Vxworks, version 5.5.1.
An M2000 server providing access to the management functions

of the TOE via SSL. M2000 version must be V2R11.
M2000 Mediation Software: The M2000 server software consists

of the main version software and mediation software. The main
version software implements system functions, and the mediation
software is used for the adaptation of different NE interfaces. The
M2000 can manage new NEs after the corresponding mediation
software is installed.
The physical structure of LTE eNodeB includes BBU3900 and

RRU. BBU3900 is based on HERT hardware platform. HERT BBU
is a common platform for wireless multiple products, different
boards can be configured according to each product. Beside the
hardware support platform subsystem, in most cases only need to
configure the LTE Main Processes and Transmission board
(LMPT) and LTE BaseBand processing (LBBI)
S-GW:
Serving Gateway, Within the EPC the S-GW is
responsible for tunnelling user plane traffic between the eNB and
the PDN-GW. To do this its role includes acting as the mobility
anchor point for the User Plane during handovers between eNB
as well as data buffering when traffic arrives for a mobile in the
LTE Idle state. Other functions performed by the S-GW include
routing, Lawful Interception and billing.
MME: Mobility Management Entity terminates the control plane

with the mobile device.
UE: User Equipment, by air interface data encryption, can share

the wireless access through LTE network.
RRU: The RRU is the remote radio unit (RRU) for Huawei
Worldwide Interoperability for LTE eNodeB. The RRU mainly
performs the following functions:
o Amplifies weak signals from the antenna system, downconverting the signals to intermediate frequency (IF)
signals, performing analog-to-digital conversion, digital
down-conversion, filtering, and AGC on the IF signals,
and transmitting these signals to the baseband unit
(BBU) through the high-speed transmission link
- 13 -
o Receives the downlink baseband digital signals from the

BBU, performing matched filtering, digital up-conversion,
clipping on the signals, modulating the output I/Q
differential signals to required TX signals, amplifying the
signals, and transmitting them through antennas.
33
The TOE can be deployed in one of the following physical

configurations with no changes in the functionality, or in the installation
procedures to be followed:
DBS3900 LTE FDD: Distributed base station. The DBS3900 LTE

FDD is characterized by its small footprint, easy installation, and
low power consumption. Therefore, the DBS3900 LTE FDD can
be easily installed in a spare space at an existing site. The RRU is
also compact and light. It can be installed close to the antenna to
reduce feeder loss and to improve system coverage. With these
characteristics, the DBS3900 LTE FDD fully addresses operators'
concern over site acquisition and reduces network deployment
time. Therefore, the DBS3900 LTE FDD enables operators to
efficiently deploy a high-performance LTE network with a low Total
Cost of Ownership (TCO) by minimizing the investment in
electricity, space, and manpower.
The DBS3900 LTE FDD has flexible applications to meet the
requirement of fast network deployment in different scenarios.
DBS3900 LTE TDD: Distributed base station. The DBS3900 LTE

TDD, a future-oriented E-UTRAN NodeB (eNodeB) product
launched by Huawei, is a distributed eNodeB supporting TDD.
The DBS3900 LTE TDD fully exploits Huawei platform resources
and uses a variety of technologies.
The DBS3900 LTE TDD is characterized by its small footprint,
easy installation, and low power consumption. Therefore, the
DBS3900 LTE TDD can be easily installed in a spare space at an
existing site. The RRU is also compact and light. It can be installed
close to the antenna to reduce feeder loss and to improve system
coverage. With these characteristics, the DBS3900 LTE TDD fully
addresses operators' concern over site acquisition and reduces
network deployment time. Thus, the DBS3900 LTE TDD enables
operators to efficiently deploy a high-performance LTE network
with a low Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) by minimizing the
investment in electricity, space, and manpower.
The DBS3900 LTE TDD has flexible applications to meet the
requirement of fast network deployment in different scenarios.
BTS3900 LTE: Indoor cabinet macro base station. The BTS3900

LTE is a compact indoor macro eNodeB. It applies to the
scenarios of centralized installation and replacement of traditional
macro base stations.
- 14 -
The BTS3900 LTE provides the following features:

o The BBU3900 and RFUs are installed in the BTS3900
LTE in centralized mode. This helps to reduce the cost
of maintenance on the tower.
o The BTS3900 LTE provides compact size, low weight,
large space, and excellent scalability, and it supports
stack installation and combined installation of two
BTS3900s.
o The BTS3900 LTE, BTS3900 GSM, and BTS3900
UMTS can share one indoor macro cabinet. This saves
installation space and facilitates smooth evolution.
BTS3900A LTE: Outdoor cabinet macro base station. The

BTS3900A LTE is a compact outdoor macro eNodeB. It applies to
the scenarios of centralized installation and replacement of
traditional macro base stations.
The BTS3900A LTE provides the following features:
o The BBU3900 and RFUs are installed in the BTS3900A
o The BTS3900A LTE supports stack installation. This
reduces the weight of a single cabinet and facilitates
transportation.
o The BTS3900A LTE, BTS3900A GSM, and BTS3900A
UMTS can share RFCs. This saves installation space
and facilitates smooth evolution.
BTS3900L LTE: Large indoor cabinet macro base station. The

BTS3900L LTE is a compact indoor macro eNodeB. It applies to
the scenarios of centralized installation and replacement of
traditional macro base stations.
The BTS3900L LTE has the following features:
o The BBU3900 and RFUs are installed in the BTS3900L
o The BTS3900L LTE provides compact size, low weight,
large space, and excellent scalability, and it supports
combined installation of two BTS3900Ls.
- 15 -
o The BTS3900L LTE, BTS3900L GSM, and BTS3900

UMTS can share one indoor macro cabinet. This saves
installation space and facilitates smooth evolution.
1.4.
TOE Description
1.4.1. Logical Scope

34
This section will define the logical scope of the TOE. The software
architecture of the TOE is indicated in the following figure:
Figure 4 Software architecture

35
An explanation of each identified part is described below.

- 16 -
36
From the Logical point of view, the following figure includes the TOE
Logical Scope, where all the connections to the TOE are indicated, and
also the way the TOE is deployed in the different boards of the product.
FTP
Server
WebLMT
SSL
M2000
BIN
MML
FTP
WebLMT
OM(Operation and
Maintenance)
X2
eNB
S1
Product Service
MME/
S-GW
HERT Platform
VxWorks OS
Hardware
LMPT
OM(Operation
and Maintenance)
Product
Service
BaseBand
Service
UU
UE
HERT Platform
VxWorks OS
Hardware
LBBI
Product Service
VxWorks OS
Hardware
RRU
Figure 5 TOE Logical Scope

37
The TOE is pure software. OS and other software provided by

particular products is TOE environment. In the above diagrams, the
content of the blue areas (excluding the grey boxes) are parts of the
- 17 -
TOE. The TOE includes Operation and Maintenance (OM), Product

Service, and HERT platform.
38
The TOE security functionality, as stated in the section 1.3 TOE

Overview is:
Authentication.
Access control.
Auditing.
Communications security.
UU Interface encryption
S1 Interface encryption
X2 Interface encryption
Resource management.
Security functionality management.
Digital signature.
39
As shown in Figure 4 Software Architecture, the TOE is entirely

composed by software. The Operating System, and other software
provided by particular products belong to the TOE environment. The
TOE itself includes OM, Product Service, Transport Management,
TRAN, CPBSP and Dopra SSP.
40
For each of the identified parts of the TOE, a correspondence between

them and the TOE security functionality can be achieved. That way, for
each part, the appropriate security associated functionality is indicated
in the following table:
Element
Part
Associated security
functionality
Security
Function
Interface
All the interfaces
Resource
management
UU: interface with the User Equipment
UU Interface
encryption
S1: Interface with the MME/S-GW
S1 Interface
encryption
X2: Interface with other eNodeBs.
X2 Interface
encryption
Communications through the following
Communications
- 18 -
protocols:
security
BIN: Huaweis private binary message

protocol.
MML: Man-Machine Language.
FTP: File transmission Protocol
Operation and
Maintenance
(OM)
HERT Platform
Transport
Management
(TM)
NMI: network management interface:

which is the interface for external
element
NA
CFG: Configuration Management,

responsible for the managed element
configuration.
Security functionality
management
PM: Performance management,

responsible for the calculation of
performance data and the storage of it.
NA
FM: Fault management, which include

fault and alarm monitoring.
NA
SWM: Software management,

responsible for software upgrade and
rollback.
Digital signature
LOG: Responsible for the audit and

storage of security log and operational
log.
Auditing
TRACE: Responsible for the trace

messages which show the state of the
eNodeB and UE within the LTE
network.
NA
VPP: Voice Protocol Platform, which is

composed of voice and signal
processing component, such as XML
Parser, Stream Control Transmission
Protocol (SCTP) and Signaling ATM
Adaptation Layer (SAAL).
Communication
Security
VISP: Versatile IP and Security

Platform, which provides TCP / IP
protocol stack management interface.
HERT Platform
TRAN
HERT Platform
Dopra SSP
(Runtime
Environment)
Huawei's wireless transmission

platform, which provide hardware driver
management interface.
Communication
Security
Provide Operating System mid-ware

layer. It function includes: Operation
System Adapter, Memory management,
Timer management, etc.
NA
- 19 -
41
CPBSP
Provide a standard API interface for the

hardware.
NA
Product Service
Radio resource management (RRM):

Responsible for the management of all
wireless resources, such as site, sector,
carrier frequency, etc., including the
establishment, monitoring, modify, and
delete
NA
User entity management (UEM): Deal

with the user call control management
and signal processes in control plane,
such as network entrance signal flow,
traffic and connection management,
security, end-state machine, etc.
NA
System control and security management are performed on LMPT

board via a secure channel enforcing SSL. The management of the
functionality of the TOE can be done through different interfaces:
BIN/MML through an M2000 server providing management

functions to the TOE (in the TOE environment).
WebLMT used by users to connect to the TOE for access through

LMPT via a secure channel enforcing SSL.
1.4.2. Physical Scope

42
The release packages for LTE eNodeB are composed of software and
documents. The LTE eNodeB software packages are in the form of
binary compressed files.
43
The LTE eNodeB software packages can be downloaded and stored in

the LMPT board, and then, they will be checked up, unpacked, and
then distributed to each board module.
44
The list of the files and documents required for the products is the
following:
Software and
Documents
Description
Remark
Software.csp
Board software package
The software packages

which are the TOE will be
digitally signed to ensure
their legitimacy and
integrity.
(In the form of binary

compressed files)
Firmware.csp
BootROM package
(In the form of binary
compressed files)
- 20 -
Software and
Documents
Description
Remark
LTE eNodeB Software

documents
Release notes, MML

command reference, and
alarm reference.
The guidance documents of

LTE eNodeB Software
Table 1 Physical Scope
- 21 -
2.
Conformance claim
45
This ST is CC Part 2 conformant [CC] and CC Part 3 conformant [CC].

The CC version of [CC] is 3.1R3.
46
This ST is EAL3 conformant as defined in [CC] Part 3, with the

assurance level of EAL3 Augmented with ALC_CMC.4, ALC_CMS.4.
47
The methodology to be used for evaluation is CEM3.1 R3
48
No conformance to a Protection Profile is claimed.
- 22 -
3.
Security Problem Definition
3.1.
TOE Assets
49
The following table includes the assets that have been considered for
the TOE:
Asset
A1.Software and
patches
A2.Stored configuration
data
Description
The integrity and confidentiality of the
system software and the patches when
in transit across the management
network should be protected from
modification and disclosure.
stored configuration data should be
protected.
Configuration data includes the security
related parameters under the control of
the TOE (such as user account
information and passwords, audit
records, etc).
Asset value
Integrity
Confidentiality
Integrity
Confidentiality
A3. In transit
configuration data

configuration data when travelling in the
management network.
Integrity
Confidentiality
A4. Service
Recoverability in terms of the capacity of

recovery in case of denial of service.
Recoverability
Table 2 TOE assets
3.2.
Threats
50
This section of the security problem definition shows the threats to be

countered by the TOE, its operational environment, or a combination of
both. The threat agents can be categorized as either:
Agent
Eavesdropper
Internal attacker
Restricted authorized
user
Description
An eavesdropper from the management network served by
the TOE is able to intercept, and potentially modify or reuse the data that is being sent to the TOE.
An unauthorized agent who is connected to the
management network.
An authorized user of the TOE who has been granted
authority to access certain information and perform certain
actions.
Table 3 Threats agents
51
In the first and second cases, the users are assumed to be potentially
hostile with a clear motivation to get access to the data. In the last
- 23 -
case, all authorized users of the TOE are entrusted with performing
certain administrative or management activities with regard to the
managed device. Consequently, organizational means are expected to
be in place to establish a certain amount of trust into these users.
However, accidental or casual attempts to perform actions or access
data outside of their authorization are expected. The assumed security
threats are listed below.
3.2.1. Threats by Eavesdropper

Threat: T1.InTransitConfiguration
An eavesdropper in the management network succeeds in
Attack
accessing the content of the BS file while transferring, violating its
confidentiality or integrity.
Asset
A3.In transit configuration data
Agent
Eavesdropper
Threat: T2. InTransitSoftware
An eavesdropper in the management network succeeds in
Attack
accessing the content of the BS software/patches while
transferring, violating its confidentiality or integrity.
Asset
A1.Software and patches;
Agent
Eavesdropper
3.2.2. Threats by Internal Attacker

Threat: T3.UnwantedNetworkTraffic
Unwanted network traffic sent to the TOE will cause the TOEs
processing capacity for incoming network traffic to be consumed
thus failing to process legitimate traffic.
Attack
This may further causes the TOE fails to respond to system control
and security management operations.
The TOE will be able to recover from this kind of situations.
Asset
A4. Service
Agent
Internal Attacker
Threat: T4.UnauthenticatedAccess
An attacker in the management network gains access to the TOE
Attack
disclosing or modifying the configuration date stored in the TOE in
a way that is not detected.
Asset
A2.Stored configuration data
Agent
Internal Attacker
3.2.3. Threats by restricted authorized user

Threat: T5.UnauthorizedAccess
A user of the TOE authorized to perform certain actions and access
Attack
certain information gains access to commands or information he is
not authorized for.
Asset
A2.Stored configuration data
- 24 -
Agent
3.3.
Restricted authorized user
Organizational Policies
3.3.1. P1.Audit
52
The TOE shall provide audit functionality:
Generation of audit information.
Storage of audit log.
Review of audit records.
3.3.2. P2.S1_Encryption
53
The TOE shall encrypt/decrypt of the data exchanged over the S1

interface.
3.3.3. P3.X2_Encryption
54
The TOE shall encrypt/decrypt of the data exchanged over the X2

interface.
3.3.4. P4.UU_Encryption
55
The TOE shall encrypt/decrypt of the data exchanged over the UU

interface.
3.4.
Assumptions
3.4.1. Physical
A.PhysicalProtection
56
It is assumed that the TOE is protected against unauthorized physical

access.
3.4.2. Personnel
A.TrustworthyUsers
57
It is assumed that the organization responsible for the TOE and its
operational environment has measures in place to establish trust into
and train users of the TOE commensurate with the extent of
authorization that these users are given on the TOE. (For example,
super users and users that are assigned similar privileges are assumed
to be fully trustworthy and capable of operating the TOE in a secure
manner abiding by the guidance provided to them.)
- 25 -
3.4.3. Connectivity
A.NetworkSegregation
58
It is assumed that the network interfaces that allow access to the TOEs
user interfaces are in a management network that is separated from the
UU, S1 and X2 interface networks.
3.4.4. Support
A.Support
59
The operational environment must provide the following supporting

mechanisms to the TOE: Reliable time stamps for the generation of
audit records.
3.4.5. SecurePKI
A.SecurePKI
60
There exists a well managed protected public key infrastructure. The

certificates used by the TOE and its client are managed by the PKI.
- 26 -
4.
Security Objectives
4.1.
Security Objectives for the TOE
61
The following objectives must be met by the TOE:

O.Authentication
62
The TOE must

establishment.
authenticate
users
and
control
the
session
O.Authorization
63
The TOE shall implement different authorization levels that can be

assigned to administrators in order to restrict the functionality that is
available to individual local users.
O.SecureCommunication
64
The TOE shall provide a secure remote communication channel for

remote administration of the TOE via SSL.
O. SoftwareIntegrity
65
The TOE must provide functionality to verify the integrity of the received
software patches.
O.Resources
66
The TOE must implement VLAN separation and IP based ACLs to

avoid resource overhead.
O.Audit
67
The TOE shall provide audit functionality:
Generation of audit information.
Storage of audit log.
Review of audit records.
O.S1_Encryption
68
The TOE shall encrypt/decrypt of the data exchanged over the S1

interface.
O.X2_Encryption
69
The TOE shall encrypt/decrypt of the data exchanged over the X2

interface.
O.UU_Encryption
70
The TOE shall encrypt/decrypt of the data exchanged over the UU

interface.
- 27 -
4.2.
Security Objectives for the Operational Environment

OE. PhysicalProtection
71
The TOE (i.e., the complete system including attached interfaces) shall
be protected against unauthorized physical access.
OE.NetworkSegregation
72
The TOE environment shall assure that the network interfaces that
allow access to the TOEs user interfaces are in a management
network that is separated from the networks that the TOE serves over
the UU and S1 and X2 interfaces.
OE.TrustworthyUsers
73
Those responsible for the operation of the TOE and its operational
environment must be trustworthy, and trained such that they are
capable of securely managing the TOE and following the provided
guidance.
OE.Support
74
Those responsible for the operation of the TOE and its operational
environment must ensure that the operational environment provides the
following supporting mechanisms to the TOE: Reliable time stamps for
the generation of audit records.
OE. SecurePKI
75
There exists a well managed protected public key infrastructure. The

certificates used by the TOE and its client are managed by the PKI.
4.3.
Security Objectives rationale
4.3.1. Coverage
76
The following tables provide a mapping of security objectives to the

environment defined by the threats, policies and assumptions,
illustrating that each security objective covers at least one threat and
that each threat is countered by at least one objective, assumption or
policy.
- 28 -
O.Authentication
O.Authorization
O.SoftwareIntegrity
O.Resources
O.Audit
O.S1_Encryption
O.X2_Encryption
O.UU_Encryption
OE.PhysicalProtection
OE.TrustworthyUsers
OE.NetworkSegregation
OE.Support
OE.SecurePKI
X
X
X
X
P4.UU_Encryption
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Table 4 Mapping of security objectives
4.3.2. Sufficiency
77
P3.X2_Encryption
P2.S1_Encryption
P1.Audit
A. SecurePKI
A.Support
A.TrustworthyUsers
T5.UnauthorizedAccess
T4.UnauthenticatedAccess
T3.UnwantedNetworkTraffic
T2.InTransitSoftware
T1.InTransitConfiguration
The following rationale provides justification that the security objectives

are suitable to counter each individual threat and that each security
objective tracing back to a threat, when achieved, actually contributes
to the removal, diminishing or mitigation of that threat:
Threat
T1.InTransitConfiguration
T2. InTransitSoftware
Rationale for security objectives

The threat T1.InTransitConfiguration is countered by
requiring communications security via SSL for
network communication between entities in the
management network and the TOE
(O.SecureCommunication). A secure PKI will be
needed to assure the validity of the used certificates.
(OE.SecurePKI)
The threat T2.InTransitSoftware is countered by
O.SecureCommunication which establishes a secure
communication channel between the TOE and
external entities in the management network. A
secure PKI will be needed to assure the validity of the
used certificates. (OE.SecurePKI)
This threat is also countered by O.SoftwareIntegrity:
when a software package is loaded, its message
digest and signature are verified.
- 29 -
T3.UnwantedNetworkTraffic
The threat T3.UnwantedNetworkTraffic is directly

counteracted by the security objective for the TOE
O.Resources.
T4.UnauthenticatedAccess
The threat T4.UnauthenticatedAccess is countered by

the security objective for the TOE O.Authentication
which requires the TOE to implement an
authentication mechanism for the local users.
The security objective for the operational environment
OE.PhysicalProtection contributes to the mitigation of
the threat assuring that the software and configuration
files stored in the TOE will not be modified.
The threat T5.UnauthorizedAccess is countered by
the security objective for the TOE O.Authentication
which requires the TOE to implement an
authentication mechanism for the local users.
It is also countered by requiring the TOE to implement
an access control mechanism (O.Authorization).
It is also countered by requiring the TOE to implement
secure communications between TOE and its users
(O.SecureCommunication). A secure PKI will be
needed to assure the validity of the used certificates.
(OE.SecurePKI).
OE.TrustworthyUsers contributes to the mitigation of
this threat requiring the users to be responsible with
their passwords.
OE.PhysicalProtection contributes to the mitigation of
the threat assuring that the software and configuration
files stored in the TOE, will not be modified
T5.UnauthorizedAccess
Table 5 Sufficiency analysis for threats

Assumption

This assumption is directly implemented by the
security objective for the environment
OE.PhysicalProtection.
A.TrustworthyUsers

OE.TrustworthyUsers.

OE.NetworkSegregation.
A.Support

security objective for the environment OE.Support.
A. SecurePKI

security objective for the environment. OE. SecurePKI
Table 6 Sufficiency analysis for assumptions
Policy
P1.Audit

This policy is directly implemented by the security
objective for the TOE O.Audit
- 30 -
P2.S1_Encryption
P3.X2_Encryption
P4.UU_Encryption

objective for the TOE O.S1_Encryption
objective for the TOE O.X2_Encryption
objective for the TOE O.UU_Encryption
Table 7 Sufficiency analysis for organizational security policy
- 31 -
5.
Security Requirements for the TOE
5.1.
Security Requirements
5.1.1. Security Audit (FAU)

5.1.1.1. FAU_GEN.1 Audit data generation
FAU_GEN.1.1 The TSF shall be able to generate an audit record of the following
auditable events:
a)
b)
c)
Start-up and shutdown of the audit functions;

All auditable events for the [selection: not specified] level of audit; and
[assignment: The following auditable events:
i. user activity
1. login, logout (SEC)
2. operation requests (OPE)
ii. user management
1. add, delete, modify (SEC & OPE)
2. password change (OPE)
3. authorization modification (SEC & OPE)
iii. locking, unlocking (manual or automatic) (SEC & OPE)
iv. command group management
1. add, delete, modify (OPE)
]
FAU_GEN.1.2 The TSF shall record within each audit record at least the
following information:
a)
b)
Date and time of the event, type of event, subject identity (if applicable),
and the outcome (success or failure) of the event; and
For each audit event type, based on the auditable event definitions of the
functional components included in the PP/ST. [assignment: workstation IP
(if applicable), user (if applicable), and command name (if applicable).]
Application note: There are two kinds of log files, security log file and operation log
file.
5.1.1.2. FAU_GEN.2 User identity association

FAU_GEN.2.1 For audit events resulting from actions of identified users, the
TSF shall be able to associate each auditable event with the identity of the user
that caused the event.
- 32 -
5.1.1.3. FAU_SAR.1 Audit review

FAU_SAR.1.1 The TSF shall provide [assignment: users with audit review
rights] with the capability to read [assignment: all information] from the audit
records.
FAU_SAR.1.2 The TSF shall provide the audit records in a manner suitable for
the user to interpret the information.
5.1.1.4. FAU_SAR.3 Selectable Audit review

FAU_SAR.3.1 The TSF shall provide the ability to apply [assignment: selection]
of audit data based on [assignment: date and time range, user name, terminal
type, and/or result.]
5.1.1.5. FAU_STG.1 Protected audit trail storage

FAU_STG.1.1 The TSF shall protect the stored audit records in the audit trail
from unauthorized deletion.
FAU_STG.1.2 The TSF shall be able to [selection: prevent] unauthorized
modifications to the stored audit records in the audit trail.
5.1.1.6. FAU_STG.3 Action in case of possible audit data loss

FAU_STG.3.1 The TSF shall [assignment: delete the oldest files] if the audit trail
exceeds [assignment: the pre-defined limited size of 1Mbyte].
Application note: For each kind of log file, there are two audit files, when the new file
is full, the old one is deleted.
5.1.2. Cryptographic Support (FCS)

5.1.2.1. FCS_COP.1/Sign Cryptographic operation
FCS_COP.1.1 The TSF shall perform [assignment: digital signature verification]
in accordance with a specified cryptographic algorithm [assignment: RSA with
underlying SHA-256] and cryptographic key sizes [assignment: 1024bits] that
meet the following: [assignment: none]
Application note: This requirement addresses the digital signature verification of the
remote loaded software packages.
- 33 -
5.1.2.2. FCS_COP.1/SSL Cryptographic operation

FCS_COP.1.1 The TSF shall perform [assignment: cipher and decipher of TOE
access channels] in accordance with a specified cryptographic algorithm
[assignment: algorithms supported by SSL/TLS] and cryptographic key sizes
[assignment: key sizes supported by SSL/TLS] that meet the following:
[assignment: none]
Application note: This requirement addresses the encryption of the communication

through the WebLMT , the integrated port, or with the FTP servers.
5.1.2.3. FCS_COP.1/UU Cryptographic operation

communication with the UE] in accordance with a specified cryptographic
algorithm [assignment: AES/SNOW 3G] and cryptographic key sizes
[assignment: 128 bits] that meet the following: [assignment: none]
Application note: This requirement addresses the encryption of the channel with the
UE.
5.1.2.4. FCS_COP.1/S1 Cryptographic operation

communication with the MME/S-GW] in accordance with a specified
cryptographic algorithm [assignment: algorithms supported by IPSec/IKE] and
cryptographic key sizes [assignment: key sizes supported by IPSec/IKE] that
Application note: This requirement addresses the encryption of the channel with the
MME/S-GW.
5.1.2.5. FCS_COP.1/X2 Cryptographic operation

communication with other LTE eNodeB] in accordance with a specified
cryptographic algorithm [assignment: algorithms supported by IPSec/IKE] and
cryptographic key sizes [assignment: key sizes supported by IPSec/IKE] that
- 34 -
Application note: This requirement addresses the encryption of the channel with
other LTE eNodeB.
5.1.2.6. FCS_CKM.1/SSL Cryptographic key generation

FCS_CKM.1.1 The TSF shall generate cryptographic keys in accordance with a
specified cryptographic key generation algorithm [assignment: cryptographic
key generation methods supported by SSL/TLS] and cryptographic key sizes
[assignment: key sizes supported by SSL/TLS] that meet the following:
[assignment: none]
5.1.2.7. FCS_CKM.1/UU Cryptographic key generation

specified cryptographic key generation algorithm [assignment: AKA protocol]
and cryptographic key sizes [assignment: 128 bits] that meet the following:
[assignment: none]
5.1.2.8. FCS_CKM.1/S1 Cryptographic key generation

key generation methods supported by IPSec/IKE] and cryptographic key sizes
[assignment: key sizes supported by IPSec/IKE] that meet the following:
[assignment: none]
5.1.2.9. FCS_CKM.1/X2 Cryptographic key generation

key generation methods supported by IPSec/IKE] and cryptographic key sizes
[assignment: key sizes supported by IPSec/IKE] that meet the following:
[assignment: none]
5.1.3. User Data Protection (FDP)

5.1.3.1. FDP_ACC.1/Local Subset access control
FDP_ACC.1.1 The TSF shall enforce the [assignment: Local access control
policy] on [assignment: local users as subjects, commands as objects, and
execution of commands by local users].
- 35 -
5.1.3.2. FDP_ACF.1/Local Security attribute based access control

FDP_ACF.1.1 The TSF shall enforce the [assignment: Local access control
policy] to objects based on the following:
[assignment:
a)
b)
local users and their following security attributes:

i. user name
ii. user group (role)
commands and their following security attributes:
i. command name
ii. command groups.]
FDP_ACF.1.2 The TSF shall enforce the following rules to determine if an

operation among controlled subjects and controlled objects is allowed:
[assignment:
if the user belongs to a user group that is assigned to a command group that
includes the controlled command, then access is granted.
If the user belongs to the custom user group, and he is associated to the
command group that includes the controlled command, then access is granted]
FDP_ACF.1.3 The TSF shall explicitly authorise access of subjects to objects
based on the following additional rules: [assignment: If the user name is admin,
access is always granted]
FDP_ACF.1.4 The TSF shall explicitly deny access of subjects to objects based
on the following additional rules: [assignment: None]
5.1.3.3. FDP_ACC.1/Domain Subset access control

FDP_ACC.1.1 The TSF shall enforce the [assignment: Domain access control
policy] on [assignment: domain users as subjects, commands as objects, and
execution of commands by domain users].
5.1.3.4. FDP_ACF.1/Domain Security attribute based access control

FDP_ACF.1.1 The TSF shall enforce the [assignment: Domain access control
policy] to objects based on the following:
[assignment:
a)
b)
domain users and their following security attributes:

i. user name
ii. command name]

- 36 -
[assignment: if the user is assigned to the requested commands, then access is

granted.]
based on the following additional rules: [assignment: If the user group
assigned to the user in the M2000 is Administrators, access is always granted]
Application note: This requirement implements the domain users access control
policy. The users will login through the TOE but authentication is performed by an
external entity which will send the operational rights to the TOE so it can exercise the
access control policy.
5.1.3.5. FDP_ACC.1/EMSCOMM Subset access control

FDP_ACC.1.1 The TSF shall enforce the [assignment: EMSCOMM access
control policy ] on [assignment: EMSCOMM user as subject, commands as
objects, and execution of commands by the EMSCOMM user].
5.1.3.6. FDP_ACF.1/EMSCOMM
control
Security attribute
based
access
FDP_ACF.1.1 The TSF shall enforce the [assignment: EMSCOMM access

control policy] to objects based on the following:
[assignment:
a)
b)
EMSCOMM user and its following security attributes:

i. user name
ii. command name]

[assignment: the EMSCOMM user will always have execution permission of the
targeted command.]
based on the following additional rules: [assignment: None]
Application note: This requirement implements the M2000 access control policy.
- 37 -
5.1.4. Identification and Authentication (FIA)

5.1.4.1. FIA_AFL.1 Authentication failure handling
FIA_AFL.1.1 The TSF shall detect when [selection: an administrator
configurable positive integer within [assignment: 1 and 255] ] unsuccessful
authentication attempts occur related to [assignment: authentication of local
users since the last successful authentication of the user and before the
counter for these attempts is reset after an administrator configurable time
frame either between 1 and 60 minutes].
FIA_AFL.1.2 When the defined number of unsuccessful authentication attempts
has been [selection: surpassed], the TSF shall [assignment: lockout the
account for an administrator configurable duration either between 1 and 65535
minutes]
Application note: The EMSCOMM user is not considered in this requirement. The
EMSCOMM user is authenticated in the TOE by automatic method and not by user
and password. Domain users are authenticated in the M2000 element of the TOE
environment, so they are also not considered in this requirement neither by the TOE
authentication functionality.
5.1.4.2. FIA_ATD.1 User attribute definition

FIA_ATD.1.1 The TSF shall maintain the following list of security attributes
belonging to individual users:
[assignment:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
User name
User group
Password
Number of unsuccessful authentication attempts since last successful
authentication attempt
Login allowed start time
Login allowed end time
Lock status]
environment, so they are not considered in this requirement neither by the TOE
- 38 -
5.1.4.3. FIA_SOS.1 Verification of secrets

FIA_SOS.1.1 The TSF shall provide a mechanism to verify that secrets meet:
[assignment:
a)
b)
an administrator configurable minimum length between 6 and 32

characters,
an administrator configurable combination of the following:
i. at least one lower-case alphanumerical character,
ii. at least one upper-case alphanumerical character,
iii. at least one numerical character,
iv. at least one special character.
c)
that they are different from an administrator configurable number between

1 to 10 previous used passwords ]
5.1.4.4. FIA_UAU.1 Timing of authentication

FIA_UAU.1.1 the TSF shall allow [assignment:
a)
b)
c)
d)
Handshake command
Parameter negotiation
New web session ID request
CAPTCHA management]
On behalf of the user to be performed before the user is authenticated.
FIA_UAU.1.2 the TSF shall require each user to be successfully authenticated

before allowing any other TSF-mediated actions on behalf of that user.
5.1.4.5. FIA_UAU.5 Multiple authentication mechanisms

FIA_UAU.5.1 The TSF shall provide [assignment:
a) Authentication for Local Users
b) Authentication for Domain Users
c) Authentication for EMSCOMM user
] to support user authentication.
FIA_UAU.5.2 The TSF shall authenticate any users claimed identity according
to the [assignment:
a)
b)
c)
Local Users are authenticated in the TOE by user and password stored in
the TOE.
Domain users authentication is delegated in the M2000 management
element of the environment by user and password
EMSCOMM user applies a special arithmetic procedure common to both
parties, the TOE and the M2000 to proof the knowledge of the algorithm.
5.1.4.6. FIA_UID.1 Timing of identification

FIA_UID.1.1 The TSF shall allow [assignment:
a)
Handshake command
- 39 -
b)
c)
d)
Parameter negotiation
New web session ID request
CAPTCHA management ]
on behalf of the user to be performed before the user is identified.
FIA_UID.1.2 the TSF shall require each user to be successfully identified before
allowing any other TSF-mediated actions on behalf of that user.
5.1.5. Security Management (FMT)

5.1.5.1. FMT_MSA.1 Management of security attributes
FMT_MSA.1.1 The TSF shall enforce the [assignment: Local access control
policy] to restrict the ability to [selection: query and modify] the security
attributes [assignment:
a)
b)
Command groups
User groups]
to [assignment: users with the appropriate rights].
5.1.5.2. FMT_MSA.3 Static attribute initialization

FMT_MSA.3.1 The TSF shall enforce the [assignment: Local access control
policy] to provide [selection: permissive] default values for security attributes
that are used to enforce the SFP.
FMT_MSA.3.2 The TSF shall allow the [assignment: administrator defined roles
with the appropriate rights] to specify alternative initial values to override the
default values when an object or information is created.
5.1.5.3. FMT_SMF.1 Specification of Management Functions

FMT_SMF.1.1 The TSF shall be capable of performing the following
management functions: [assignment:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)
k)
Local User management

Command group management (creation, deletion, modification, commands
membership)
Local users authorization management (User group authorization on
Command groups)
Configuration of SSL (Certificates and auth mode )
Configuration of IPSec
Configuration of ACL
Configuration of VLAN
Configuration of UU interface
Enable/Disable software digital signature
FIA_SOS.1.1 configurable values (Password policy)
FIA_AFL.1.1 configurable values (Authentication failure handling)]
- 40 -
Application note: The TOE includes default users whose associated parameters (but
the password) cannot be modified. These users are admin and guest.
5.1.5.4. FMT_SMR.1 Security roles

FMT_SMR.1.1 The TSF shall maintain the roles: [assignment: Administrator,
User, Operator, Guest, Custom]
FMT_SMR.1.2 The TSF shall be able to associate users with roles.
Application note: These roles are only applicable to the local users. The domain
users are not maintained in the TOE, no role neither user group is assigned to a
domain user. Also, the EMSCOMM user can not be assigned to any role.
Application note: The custom user group means that the command groups are
directly assigned to the user. The domain users are not maintained by the TOE, no
role neither user group is assigned to a domain user.
5.1.6. TOE access (FTA)

5.1.6.1. FTA_TSE.1/SEP TOE session establishment
FTA_TSE.1.1 The TSF shall be able to deny session establishment based on
[assignment:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
Protocol type (IP, ICMP, TCP, UDP or SCTP)

Source IP address and mask
Source port range
Destination IP address and mask
Destination port range
DSCP value
VLAN id]
Application note: This requirement addresses the VLAN separation and IP based
ACLs to avoid resource overhead in the S1/X2 interface and in the management
network.
5.1.6.2. FTA_TSE.1/Local TOE session establishment

FTA_TSE.1.1 The TSF shall be able to deny session establishment based on
[assignment:
a)
b)
c)
Login allowed start time

Login allowed end time
Lock status.]
- 41 -
environment, so they are not considered in this requirement neither by the TOE
5.1.7. Trusted Path/Channels (FTP)

5.1.7.1. FTP_TRP.1/WebLMT Trusted path
FTP_TRP.1.1 The TSF shall provide a communication path between itself and
[selection : remote] users that is logically distinct from other communication
paths and provides assured identification of its end points and protection of the
communicated data from [selection: disclosure].
FTP_TRP.1.2 The TSF shall permit [selection: remote users] to initiate
communication via the trusted path.
FTP_TRP.1.3 The TSF shall require the use of the trusted path for [selection:
[assignment: execution of MML commands]]
Application note: Assured identification between both parties is achieved after the
user authentication has been performed.
5.1.7.2. FTP_ITC.1/IntegratedPort Inter-TSF trusted channel

FTP_ITC.1.1 The TSF shall provide a communication channel between itself and
another trusted IT product that is logically distinct from other communication
channels and provides assured identification of its end points and protection of
the channel data from modification or disclosure.
FTP_ITC.1.2 The TSF shall permit [selection: another trusted IT product] to
initiate communication via the trusted channel.
FTP_ITC.1.3 The TSF shall initiate communication via the trusted channel for
[assignment: execution of MML/BIN commands].
Application note: Assured identification between both parties is achieved thanks to
the SSL server and peer bi directional authentication.
5.2.
Security Functional Requirements Rationale
5.2.1. Coverage
78
The following table provides a mapping of SFR to the security

objectives, showing that each security functional requirement
addresses at least one security objective.
- 42 -
O.S1_Encryption
O.X2_Encryption
O.UU_Encryption
O.SoftwareIntegrity
O.Resources
O.Authorization
FAU_GEN.1
FAU_GEN.2
FAU_SAR.1
FAU_SAR.3
FAU_STG.1
FAU_STG.3
FDP_ACC.1/Local
FDP_ACF.1/Local
FDP_ACC.1/Domain
FDP_ACF.1/Domain
FDP_ACC.1/EMSCOMM
FDP_ACF.1/EMSCOMM
FIA_AFL.1
FIA_ATD.1
FIA_UAU.1
FIA_UAU.5
FIA_UID.1
FIA_SOS.1
FMT_MSA.1
FMT_MSA.3
FMT_SMF.1
FMT_SMR.1
FTA_TSE.1/SEP
FTA_TSE.1/Local
FCS_COP.1/SSL
FCS_CKM.1/SSL
FCS_COP.1/UU
FCS_CKM.1/UU
FCS_COP.1/S1
FCS_CKM.1/S1
FCS_COP.1/X2
FCS_CKM.1/X2
FCS_COP.1/Sign
FTP_TRP.1/WebLMT
FTP_ITC.1/IntegratedPort
O.Authentication
O.Audit
Table 8 Mapping SFRs to objectives
- 43 -
5.2.2. Sufficiency
79
The following rationale provides justification for each security objective

for the TOE, showing that the security functional requirements are
suitable.
Security objectives
Rationale
O.Audit
The generation of audit records is implemented

by FAU_GEN.1. Audit records are supposed to
include user identities (FAU_GEN.2) where
applicable, which are supplied by the
authentication mechanism (FIA_UID.1).
Functionality is provisioned to read these records
(FAU_SAR.1, FAU_SAR.3). The protection of the
stored audit records is implemented in
FAU_STG.1. Functionality to prevent audit data
loss is provided by FAU_STG.3.
O.Authentication
O.Authorization
User authentication is implemented by

FIA_UAU.1 and FIA_UAU.5 and supported by
individual user identification in FIA_UID.1. The
necessary user attributes are spelled out in
FIA_ATD.1. The authentication mechanism
supports authentication failure handling
(FIA_AFL.1), and a password policy (FIA_SOS.1),
restrictions as to the validity of accounts for logon
(FTA_TSE.1/Local).
Management functionality is provided in
FMT_SMF.1.
User authentication is implemented by
FIA_UAU.1 and FIA_UAU.5 and supported by
individual user identification in FIA_UID.1.
The requirements for the local users access
control policy are modelled in FDP_ACC.1/Local,
FDP_ACF.1/Local, FMT_MSA.1 and
FMT_MSA.3. This access control is based on the
definition of roles (FMT_SMR.1). Management
functionality for this access control policy is
provided in FMT_SMF.1.
The domain users access control policy is
modelled in FDP_ACC.1/Domain and
FDP_ACF.1/Domain.
The EMSCOMM access control policy is modelled
in FDP_ACC.1/EMSCOMM and FDP_ACF.1/
EMSCOMM.
Communications security is implemented using
encryption for the communication with WebLMT
users, with the M2000 through the integration port
interface and in the communication with the FTP
servers. The keys used for the channels are
generated as part of the SSL connection
establishment process. (FCS_COP.1/SSL,
FCS_CKM.1/SSL)
A trusted channel is provided for the use of the
TOE through the Integrated Port interface
(FTP_ITC.1/IntegratedPort)
A trusted path is provided for the use of the TOE
through the WebLMT (FTP_TRP.1/WebLMT)
Management functionality to enable these
- 44 -
mechanisms is provided in FMT_SMF.1.
O.UU_Encryption
O.S1_Encryption
O.X2_Encryption
O.Resource
O.SoftwareIntegrity
Encryption over the UU interface is addressed

ciphering the channel between the TOE and the
UE. The keys used for the channels are
generated using Diffie-Hellman (FCS_COP.1/UU,
FCS_CKM.1/UU)
Management functionality to configure the
channel is provided in FMT_SMF.1.
Encryption over the S1 interface is addressed
ciphering the channel between the TOE and the
MME/S-GW. The keys used for the channels are
generated as part of the IPSec connection
establishment process. (FCS_COP.1/S1,
FCS_CKM.1/S1)
Encryption over the X2 interface is addressed
ciphering the channel between the TOE and
others eNodeBs. The keys used for the channels
are generated as part of the IPSec connection
establishment process. (FCS_COP.1/X2,
FCS_CKM.1/X2)
FTA_TSE.1/SEP implements the separation of
traffic based on VLANs and the IP based ACL to
avoid resource overhead.
Management functionality to configure the ACL
and the VLANs is provided in FMT_SMF.1.
The software integrity objective is directly
implemented with FCS_COP.1/Sign so the TOE
performs digital signature verification over the
software patches.
Table 9 SFR sufficiency analysis
5.2.3. Security Requirements Dependency Rationale

80
The security functional requirements in this Security Target do not

introduce dependencies on any security assurance requirement;
neither do the security assurance requirements in this Security Target
introduce dependencies on any security functional requirement.
81
The following table demonstrates the dependencies of SFRs modelled

in CC Part 2 and how the SFRs for the TOE resolve those
dependencies:
Security
Functional
Requirement
Dependencies
FAU_GEN.1
FPT_STM.1
FAU_GEN.2
FAU_GEN.1
FIA_UID.1
- 45 -
Resolution
Not resolved.
The system hardware or an external
time source using NTP protocol will
provide a reliable time.
FAU_GEN.1
FIA_UID.1
FAU_SAR.1
FAU_SAR.3
FAU_STG.1
FAU_STG.3
FAU_GEN.1
FAU_SAR.1
FAU_GEN.1
FAU_STG.1
[FDP_ITC.1 |
FDP_ITC.2 |
FCS_CKM.1]
FCS_COP.1/Sign
FCS_CKM.4
FDP_ACC.1/Local
FDP_ACF.1/Local
FDP_ACC.1/Domain
FDP_ACF.1
FDP_ACC.1
FMT_MSA.3
FDP_ACF.1
FDP_ACC.1
FDP_ACF.1/Domain
FDP_ACC.1/EMSCOMM
FMT_MSA.3
FDP_ACF.1
FDP_ACC.1
FDP_ACF.1/EMSCOMM
FIA_AFL.1
FIA_ATD.1
FIA_UAU.1
FIA_UAU.5
FIA_UID.1
FIA_SOS.1
FMT_MSA.1
FMT_MSA.3
FMT_SMF.1
FMT_SMR.1
FTA_TSE.1/SEP
FTA_TSE.1/Local
FCS_COP.1/SSL
FMT_MSA.3
FIA_UAU.1
None
FIA_UID.1
None
None
None
FAU_GEN.1
FAU_SAR.1
FAU_GEN.1
FAU_STG.1
Not resolved.
The digital certificate used for
signature verification is loaded as
part of the manufacture process.
Not resolved.
The digital certificate used for
signature verification is loaded as
part of the manufacture process and
are never destructed.
FDP_ACF.1/Local
FDP_ACC.1/Local
FMT_MSA.3
FDP_ACF.1/Domain
FDP_ACC.1/Domain
Not resolved.
The dependency with FMT_MSA.3 is
not resolved because the attributes of
the access control policy are not
under the control of the TOE.
FDP_ACF.1/ EMSCOMM
FDP_ACC.1/ EMSCOMM
Not resolved.
The dependency with FMT_MSA.3 is
not resolved because the attributes of
the access control policy are not
under the control of the TOE.
FIA_UAU.1
FIA_UID.1
[FDP_ACC.1 |
FDP_IFC.1]
FDP_ACC.1
FMT_SMR.1
FMT_SMR.1
FMT_SMF.1
FMT_MSA.1
FMT_SMR.1
None
FIA_UID.1
None
None
[FDP_ITC.1 |
FDP_ITC.2 |
FCS_CKM.1]
FMT_SMF.1
FMT_MSA.1
FMT_SMR.1
FCS_CKM.4
- 46 -
FIA_UID.1
FCS_CKM.1/SSL
Not resolved.
The generated keys are not
externally accessible so they do not
need to be securely removed.

[FCS_CKM.2 |
FCS_COP.1]
FCS_COP.1/SSL
FCS_CKM.4
Not resolved.
[FDP_ITC.1 |
FDP_ITC.2 |
FCS_CKM.1]
FCS_CKM.1/UU
FCS_CKM.4
Not resolved.
[FCS_CKM.2 |
FCS_COP.1]
FCS_COP.1/UU
FCS_CKM.4
Not resolved.
[FDP_ITC.1 |
FDP_ITC.2 |
FCS_CKM.1]
FCS_CKM.1/X2
FCS_CKM.4
Not resolved.
[FCS_CKM.2 |
FCS_COP.1]
FCS_COP.1/X2
FCS_CKM.4
Not resolved.
[FDP_ITC.1 |
FDP_ITC.2
|
FCS_CKM.1]
FCS_CKM.1/S1
FCS_CKM.4
Not resolved.
[FCS_CKM.2 |
FCS_COP.1]
FCS_COP.1/S1
FCS_CKM.4
Not resolved.
FCS_CKM.1/SSL
FCS_COP.1/UU
FCS_CKM.1/UU
FCS_COP.1/X2
FCS_CKM.1/X2
FCS_COP.1/S1
FCS_CKM.1/S1
FTP_TRP.1/WebLMT
None
FTP_ITC.1/IntegratedPort
None
Table 10 Dependencies between TOE Security Functional Requirements
5.3.
Security Assurance Requirements
82
The security assurance requirements for the TOE are the Evaluation
Assurance Level 3 components as specified in [CC] Part 3, augmented
with ALC_CMC.4 and ALC_CMS.4. No operations are applied to the
assurance components.
- 47 -
Assurance class
Development
Guidance documents
Life-cycle support
Security Target
evaluation
Tests
Vulnerability
assessment
Assurance
Family
ADV_ARC
ADV_FSP
ADV_IMP
ADV_INT
ADV_SPM
ADV_TDS
AGD_OPE
AGD_PRE
ALC_CMC
ALC_CMS
ALC_DEL
ALC_DVS
ALC_FLR
ALC_LCD
ALC_TAT
ASE_CCL
ASE_ECD
ASE_INT
ASE_OBJ
ASE_REQ
ASE_SPD
ASE_TSS
ATE_COV
ATE_DPT
ATE_FUN
ATE_IND
Assurance Components by Evaluation

Assurance Level
1
3
NA
NA
NA
2
1
1
4
4
1
1
NA
1
NA
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
AVA_VAN
Table 11 Security Assurance Requirements
5.4.
Security Assurance Requirements Rationale
83
The evaluation assurance level has been chosen commensurate with

the threat environment that is experienced by typical consumers of the
TOE.
- 48 -
6.
TOE Summary Specification
6.1.
TOE Security Functionality
6.1.1. Authentication
84
The TOE offers the enforcement of timer-based account lockouts:

administrators can specify after how many consecutive failed
authentication attempts an account will be temporarily locked, and
whether the counter for failed attempts will be reset automatically after
a certain amount of minutes. (FIA_AFL.1)
85
The TOE authenticates the local users based on individual user IDs
and passwords. User IDs are unique within the TOE and stored
together with associated passwords and other security attributes in the
TOEs configuration database. Those attributes can be configured by
users with the appropriate rights. (FIA_ATD.1, FMT_SMF.1)
86
The TOE can identify users in the management network by a unique ID

and enforces their authentication before granting them access to the
TSF management interfaces. Warning of error username or password
will be prompted when the user fails to provide a correct username or
password. Some not security related actions can be performed before
identification and authentication (FIA_UID.1,FIA_UAU.1)
87
Several authentication mechanisms are provided for the different

available users:
1. Local users
2. Domain users
3. EMSCOMM
88
This functionality implements FIA_UAU.5.
89
If applicable, i.e., if an administrator has specified values for these

parameters for a specific user, the TOE will deny authentication of the
user if the user tries to authenticate in a timeframe that lies outside of
the login start time and login end time specified for the user.
(FMT_SMF.1, FTA_TSE.1/Local)
90
The TOE also provide login time control mechanism: Each account can
be configured with the login time segment, including the valid date
range, time segment, and week restriction. Any login is prohibited
beyond the configured time segment. (FMT_SMF.1, FTA_TSE.1/Local)
6.1.2. Access control

91
The Local access control policy is enforced in the following way:
- 49 -
1. The system sorts users with the same operation rights into a
group to facilitate authorization and user management of the
administrator. The TOE supports five predefined user groups
(Administrator, Operator, User, Guest and Custom). The TOE
grants default command group rights to Administrator, Operator,
User and Guest which cant be modified. (FMT_SMR.1)
2. The TOE divides the system commands to different groups which
is called command groups according to different functions. LTE
eNodeB creates 22 default command groups in which the
commands are preconfigured and cant be modified by user. And
it provides 10 non-default command groups to which user adds or
removes commands. (FDP_ACF.1/Local)
3. User groups are allowed to access one or more command groups.
(FDP_ACF.1/Local)
4. The users that have a custom user group are directly related to
the command groups accessible by them.
5. Therefore, a user has access to a command if its user group is
associated with a command group that contains the command the
user wants to access. (FDP_ACC.1/Local)
6. This access control policy is used to restrict the ability to modify
the users and commands relationship. (FMT_MSA.1,
FMT_MSA.3)
7. If the user is the admin special user, access is always granted
regardless the command group.
92
To allow the customization of the product, ten configurable commands

groups and one configurable user group exist. (FMT_SMF.1)
93
The domain access control policy allows users managed by the M2000
to execute commands in the TOE. The management of the security
attributes of this access control policy is out of the scope of the TOE.
Each time a domain user logs in the TOE (through the integration port
or through the WebLMT), the TOE send the used user and password to
the M2000 which performs user authentication and return to the user
the commands that the user can execute. If the M2000 user belongs to
the Administrator group, access to all functionality is always granted.
(FDP_ACC.1/Domain, FDP_ACF.1/Domain).
94
The EMSCOMM user is a built-in user that is used by the M2000 to

operate the TOE. This user has permission to execute all the
commands of the TOE and cannot be modified neither deleted. This
user can only be implicitly accessed through the integration port.
(FDP_ACC.1/EMSCOMM, FDP_ACF.1/EMSCOMM).
95
Note that some MML commands can only be executed through the
appropriate interface, for example, is non sense using the MOD PWD
- 50 -
command to modify the password of the emscomm user because it

doesnt have password.
96
6.1.3. Auditing
97
Removing the logs is always forbidden (FAU_STG.1)
98
There exist two kinds of audit files, the operation log and the security
log.
1. Security log: Records user operations related to the system
security, including user behaviour and configuration commands,
for example, account locking due to consecutive login failure and
updating the security policy
2. Operation log: Records all MML commands run by users.
99
For each of these kinds there exist two files that are rotated in the
following way: if one exceeds 1MB the oldest file is deleted and a new
one is created. (FAU_STG.3)
100
The auditing functionality of the TOE cannot be started or stopped

independently from the operational TOE. The TOE generates audit
records for the start and shutdown of base station, and for several
auditable events, storing the audit data in the appropriate file
(FAU_GEN.1)
101
Where available, the data recorded with each audit record includes the
unique user ID associated with a subject during authentication.
(FAU_GEN.2)
102
Users with the appropriate rights can review the audit records available
in the database. The TOE offers search functionality based on time
intervals, user IDs, interface, and/or result. (FAU_SAR.1, FAU_SAR.3)
6.1.4. Communications security

103
The TOE provides communications security for network connections to

the MPT. This includes connections via the following interfaces:
Connections to the integrated port (MML/BIN/ALARM) using

SSL/TLS. The SSL connection must include client authentication,
this
way,
a
trusted
channel
is
established
(FTP_ITC.1/IntegratedPort)
The TOE includes a FTP client which can connect and

authenticate with a FTP server. The authentication parameters
include the username and password and the IP address of the
FTP server, which can be configured. SSL/TLS is used in this
connection.
- 51 -
104
The SSL/TLS cipher suites supported for SSL connections are:
105
This functionality is implemented through FCS_COP.1/SSL and

FCS_CKM.1/SSL.The connection with the WebLMT also uses
SSL/TLS and authentication based on user id and password, providing
a trusted path (FTP_TRP.1/WebLMT)
106
This functionality is configurable. (FMT_SMF.1)
6.1.5. UU Interface Encryption

107
LTE eNodeB air interface channel refers to and wireless channel

between the eNodeB and UE. It uses 128-bit AES/SNOW 3G
encryption to prevent unauthorized access to communications content.
These functions are performed in the PDCP layer and can be activated
by RRC message between UE and eNodeB. (FCS_COP.1/UU)
108
Keys are generated using the AKA protocol (FCS_CKM.1/UU)
109
6.1.6. S1 Interface Encryption

110
The TOE provides secure communication protocols for the S1 interface

using IPSec/IKE. (FCS_COP.1/S1)
111
The keys are generated according to the IPSec/IKEv2 protocol

(FCS_CKM.1/S1)
- 52 -
112
6.1.7. X2 Interface Encryption

113
The TOE provides secure communication protocols for the X2 interface

using IPSec/IKE. (FCS_COP.1/X2)
114
The keys are generated according to the IPSec/IKEv2 protocol

(FCS_CKM.1/X2)
115
6.1.8. Resource management

116
The TOE provides VLAN to separate the traffic from different flow
planes, which reduce traffic storms and avoid resource overhead.
- 53 -
117
The TOE support VLAN division based on flows such as signalling

flows, media flows, or management flows. In other words, different
VLAN tags are marked on the three types of flows passing the BS and
they are separate from each other.
118
The TOE supports IP-based Access Control List (ACL) to filter traffic
destined to TOE which might cause system overload and service
interruption.
119
The ACL provides a simple security policy that controls the incoming
and outgoing data of unauthorized users. The ACL determines what
data is allowed to enter the transmission port and what data is not
allowed to enter the transmission port. In this way, the ACL filters the
illegitimate data.
120
The ACL controls the network access, preventing the network attacks.
In addition, the ACL filters out illegitimate data flows, improving the
network performance.
121
The ACL consists of multiple rules. Each rule contains the following
filtering conditions:
1. Protocol type (IP, ICMP, TCP, UDP, and SCTP)
2. Source IP address and mask
3. Source port range
4. Destination IP address and mask
5. Destination port range
6. Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP) value
7. ACL Action (Deny, Permit)
122
The ACL rules can be preset in the S1/X2 network interfaces, and the
ACL Action can be designated in advance. In this way, the
communication flows can be permitted or denied, and the illegitimate
data can be filtered. This method effectively prevents illegitimate
intrusions and malicious packet attacks, ensuring the security of
network devices. (FMT_SMF.1, FTA_TSE.1/SEP).
6.1.9. Security function management

123
The TOE offers management functionality for its security functions,

where appropriate. This is partially already addressed in more detail in
the previous sections of the TSS, but includes:
1. User management, including User Group memberships,
passwords, account lockout, validity periods for an account and/or
- 54 -
password, etc. Verification of the password policy is performed

when creating or modifying users (FIA_SOS.1).
2. Access control management, including the definition of Command
Groups, and the association of users and User Groups with
Command Groups.
3. Configuration of SSL for
WebLMT/M2000 and the TOE.
the
communication
between
4. Configuration of IPSec for the communication between MME/SGW and the TOE.
5. Configuration of IPSec for the communication between the TOE
and others LTE eNodeB.
6. Configuration of VLAN for the different plane between the TOE
environment and the TOE.
7. Configuration of ACL for the communication between the TOE
environment and the TOE.
8. Configuration of the Air interface.
9. Authorized administrators are able to configure a system-wide
password policy that is then enforced by the TOE. Besides the
minimum length of the password, which can be set to be between
6 and 32 characters, administrator has the option to enforce the
use of specific characters (numeric, alphanumeric low or capital,
and special characters).
124
All these management options are available. (FMT_SMF.1)
6.1.10. Digital Signature

125
To address security issues, digital signature mechanism to ensure the

legitimacy and integrity of the software packages are provided.
126
The TOE automatically checks the digital signature of the software

when the user runs the DLD SOFTWARE command to download the
software.
127
The CSP files will be the files downloaded from the FTP server to
update the TOE software and this way exercise the digital signature
mechanism implemented in the TOE.
128
In the following image the CSP structure is depicted:
- 55 -
129
This way, a directory structure is stored in the CSP file. This structure is
expected to contain some important files:
130
VERDES.SGN contains the signature of the VERDES.XML file. This

way, the TOE will verify the hash and CRC value of each of the files
using the VERDES.XML file, and that the file VERDES.XML has not
been tampered using the VERDES.SGN stored signature
(FCS_COP.1/SGN).
131
This way, the integrity chain is warrantee.
- 56 -
7.
Abbreviations, Terminology and References
7.1.
Abbreviations
Abbreviations
ACL
AKA
ASPF
BS
BIN
CC
CPBSP
CPRI
DSCP
EMS/M2000
ETH
FE
FTP
FTPs
SCTP
GE
GSM
ICMP
IKE
IP
HERT
HERT -BBU
IPSec
LTE
NE
NMS
NTP
MAC
MML
MPT
BBI
OAM (OM)
OSS
RRM
SEC
SFP
SFR
SSL
ST
SWM
TCP
Full Spelling
Access Control List
Authentication and Key Agreement
Application Specific Packet Filter
Base Station
Huaweis binary interface
Common Criteria
Common Platform Board Support Package
Common Public Radio Interface
Differentiated Services Code Point
Element Management System(M2000)
Ethernet
Fast Ethernet
File Transfer Protocol
FTP-over-SSL
Stream Control Transport Protocol
Gigabit Ethernet
Global System for Mobile Communications
Internet Control Message Protocol
Internet Key Exchange
Internet Protocol
Huawei Enhanced Radio Technology
Huawei Enhanced Radio Technology-Base Band
Unit
IP Security Protocol
Long term evolution
Network Element
Network Management System
The Network Time Protocol
Medium Access Control
Man-Machine Language
Main Processing&Transmission unit
Base-Band Interface board
Operation Administration and Maintenance
Operations Support System
Radio Resource Management
Operator Security management
Small form-factor pluggable
Security Functional Requirement
Security Socket Layer
Security Target
Software management
Transfer Control Protocol
- 57 -
TLS
TOE
TSF
TR
TRAN
UDP
UMTS
USB
VISP
VLAN
VPP
Transport Layer Security

Target of Evaluation
TOE Security Functions
Transfers Management
Transport of Radio Access Network
User Datagram Protocol
Universal Mobile Telecommunications System
Universal Serial BUS
Versatile IP and Security Platform
Virtual Local Area Network
Voice Protocol Platform
7.2.
Terminology
132
This section contains definitions of technical terms that are used with a
meaning specific to this document. Terms defined in the [CC] are not
reiterated here, unless stated otherwise.
133
Administrator: An administrator is a user of the TOE who may have

been assigned specific administrative privileges within the TOE. This
ST may use the term administrator occasionally in an informal context,
and not in order to refer to a specific role definition from the TOEs
point of view, an administrator is simply a user who is authorized to
perform certain administrative actions on the TOE and the objects
managed by the TOE.
134
Operator: See User.
135
User: A user is a human or a product/application using the TOE.
7.3.
References
136
[CC] Common Criteria for Information Technology Security Evaluation.

Part 1-3. July 2009. Version 3.1 Revision 3.
137
[CEM] Common Methodology for Information Technology Security

Evaluation. July 2009. Version 3.1 Revision 3.
- 58 -

HUAWEI 3900-LTE Security Target 2.6

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

HUAWEI 3900-LTE Security Target 2.6

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

HUAWEI 3900-LTE Security Target 2.6

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Security Target of

Huawei 3900 Series LTE eNodeB Software

Huawei 3900 Series LTE eNodeB Software Security Target

Huawei 3900 Series LTE eNodeB Software Security Target

Huawei 3900 Series LTE eNodeB Software Security Target

Huawei 3900 Series LTE eNodeB Software Security Target

Huawei 3900 Series LTE eNodeB Software Security Target

Huawei 3900 Series LTE eNodeB Software Security Target

Changes to previous version

Changed the word GRE into

Modify according to ORs

Modify according to ORs

Modify according to ORs

Huawei 3900 Series LTE eNodeB Software Security Target

This Security Target is for the CC evaluation of Huawei 3900 Series

Security Target of Huawei 3900 Series LTE

Huawei 3900 Series LTE eNodeB Software

The current generation of mobile telecommunication networks is

The ST contains a description of the security objectives and the

Huawei 3900 Series LTE eNodeB Software Security Target

1.3.1. TOE usage

The TOE possesses the following features:

The major security features implemented by the TOE and subject to

Operators using local access to the TOE in order to execute device

Authenticated access through the integrated port is enforced using SSL

The TOE implements role-based access control, limiting access to

Huawei 3900 Series LTE eNodeB Software Security Target

The TOE offers SSL/TLS channels for FTP, MML (man-machine

The IPSec protocol is used in the communication with the MME/S-GW.

The IPSec protocol is used in the communication with other LTE

VLAN (Virtual Local Area Network) are implemented to separate the

ACL (Access Control List) implements packet filtering features to

The TOE offers management functionality for its security functionality.

Security function management

In the production and distribution phases, the digital signature scheme,

1.3.2. TOE type

The TOE comprises management and control software that is deployed

It complies with 3GPP standards. A LTE/SAE system consists of the

Huawei 3900 Series LTE eNodeB Software Security Target

Figure 1 shows the position of the TOE in a LTE/SAE network.

Figure 1 LTE/SAE network

The UE/Terminal is the subscriber terminal in the LTE network. With

The NMS is Network Management System, which provides network

1.3.3. Non TOE Hardware and Software

Figure 2 BBU3900 subrack

The BBU3900 contains, at least, the following mandatory boards:

The LTE Baseband Processing and radio Interface Unit (LBBI),

Huawei 3900 Series LTE eNodeB Software Security Target

The LTE Main Processes and Transmission unit (LMPT), which is

The Universal Power and Environment Interface Unit (UPEU),

The TOE is LTE eNodeB software packages. It is deployed on the

Figure 3 Non TOE hardware and software environment

Huawei 3900 Series LTE eNodeB Software Security Target

The components of the TOE environment are the following:

Physical networks, such as Ethernet subnets, interconnecting

LTE eNodeB Operating System: Vxworks, version 5.5.1.

An M2000 server providing access to the management functions

M2000 Mediation Software: The M2000 server software consists

The physical structure of LTE eNodeB includes BBU3900 and