Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Convergence Criteria

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4
At a glance
Powered by AI
The key takeaways are convergence criteria and stopping criteria used in finite element analysis to determine when a solution has converged during the iterative solution process.

The different convergence criteria used in finite element analysis are reducing the load imbalance, decreasing displacement increments with continued iterations, and satisfying an energy balance criterion.

The two options for stopping criteria allowed in Phase2 are the absolute energy criterion and square root energy criterion, both of which are based on the energy imbalance between iterations.

Convergence Criteria

Convergence Criteria
Finite Element Analysis of Static Problems
For static finite element analysis, the equation representing equilibrium can be
written in the following matrix form:

KU = P F ,
where P represents the vector of applied loads, F the vector of internal forces, and
U the vector of current nodal displacements. In non-linear analysis the load P is
applied in a series of load steps P(1) , P(2) , P(3) ,
Finite element analysis involves solving the equation above for U . For the n-th
load step, the equation is often solved through iterations of the form:

KU ( i +1) = P( n ) F( i ) for iterations i = 0, 1, 2,

The Solution Process, Convergence and Stopping Criterion


The finite element solution process and the definition of convergence are best
explained with the simple case of a single force applied to a non-linear spring. In
this case, the relationship between the applied load P and displacement U is:

KU = P ,
where K = K (U ) is the non-linear stiffness of the spring, which is a function of
displacement. The non-linear response of the spring to loads is shown in Figure 1.
Let us assume that we already have the solution (displacement U ( n ) ) after
application of load step P( n ) to the spring, and the task now is to determine the
spring response the displacement increment U illustrated in Figure 1 below
with application of load step P( n +1) . Prior to applying the new load step, the resisting
(internal) force F(0) in the spring due to its current deformed state is in equilibrium
with the applied (external) load P( n ) .
First, we evaluate the tangent stiffness, K (0) , at the origin of the displacement-load
curve. Since Phase2 generally uses the initial stiffness method, this stiffness will be
used throughout all iterations for the new load step. Next, we calculate the current
displacement increment and update the solution:

Phase2 Theory

Convergence Criteria

K (0) U (1) = P( n +1) F(0)


1
U (1) = K (0)
( P( n +1) F(0) )

U ( n +1) = U ( n ) + U (1)
From the current displacement state we can calculate the internal force, F(1) , in the
spring (see Figure 1). At this stage, the current force error or load imbalance
P( n +1) F(1) is quite large. From Figure 1 it is evident that a key aim of the iterations
is to reduce the load imbalance to zero, or at least a very small number.
For the next iteration, we start at the new, more accurate estimate of the
displacement U ( n +1) and apply the same load step P( n +1) . This time we obtain a
displacement increment, U (2) which is smaller than the increment U (1) of the
previous iteration. Following the procedures described previously, we calculate an
updated internal force, F(2) , that is closer to equilibrating the applied load.

Figure 1: The non-linear response of a spring to applied loads. This problem has a
single degree of freedom. The figure also illustrates the iterative finite element
procedure for determining the springs behaviour under applied loads.
Typically, with continued iterations, not only does the load imbalance P( n +1) F( i )
grow smaller and smaller, the displacement increments U ( i ) also approach zero,
and updates of U ( n +1) approach the true solution. In order not to iterate
unnecessarily long, we can decide to terminate calculations when the results are
sufficiently close according to some stopping criterion or criteria.

Phase2 Theory

Convergence Criteria

Phase2 allows you to choose one of the following two options for stopping criteria:

Absolute Energy

Square Root Energy

as defined by the following equations. Although the equations below are written in
vector notation, they can be readily applied to our simple, scalar special case.
Absolute Energy Criterion
Energy convergence is satisfied when:

UT(i ) ( P(n ) F(i ) )

UT(0) ( P( n ) F(0) )

< ( specified energy tolerance)

Square Root Energy Criterion


Energy convergence is satisfied when:

Nj=1
Nj=1

(( p
(( p

( n ), j

f ( i ), j ) u( i ), j

( n ), j

f (0), j ) u(0), j

)
)

< ( specified energy tolerance)

where p( n ), j , f ( i ), j , f (0), j , u( i ), j and u(0), j are the components (N in total) of P(n ) ,

F( i ) , F(0) , U ( i ) and U (0) , respectively.


These criteria simply mean that, for a given load step, we cease iterations when the
energy imbalance of a current state becomes a small fraction of the initial energy
imbalance (energy imbalance on the first iteration). If this condition is not satisfied
during a specified maximum number of iterations, the solution process is deemed
not to have converged.

Other Stopping Criteria


Literature on finite element analysis describes other stopping criteria. Two of the
most commonly used are Force and Displacement.
Force Criterion
Stop iterations when the current force imbalance becomes a small fraction of the
total applied force (current load level).

Phase2 Theory

Convergence Criteria

Displacement Criterion
Stop iterations when the current displacement increment becomes a small fraction
of the initial displacement.
Sometimes combinations of all these criteria are used. In our experience, for the
range of problems solved with Phase2, the energy criteria have been the most
consistent and reliable.

Phase2 Theory

You might also like