EPOXY INTUMESCENT COATING SYSTEMS FOR FIRE

PROTECTION
Introduction
The first epoxy intumescent coatings for passive fire protection were developed over 30
years ago. They have become more accepted and more commonly used in recent years due
to continued improvement in formulation, application and performance. These coatings are
used extensively in the petrochemical, off-shore and marine markets.
Epoxy intumescent coatings have been shown to be suitable by testing and independent
third party approval for fire protection and offer a variety of versatile, durable, attractive, low
thickness and low weight coatings for a wide variety of structures.
This article discusses the use of this type of product, how it is tested and factors to consider
where it is to be used in fire protection.
The use of epoxy intumescents.
When used to provide passive fire protection, the main function of the coating system is to
provide an insulating barrier in the event of a fire. Under normal circumstances the coatings
are inert but when subjected to elevated temperatures the coating develops a thick char that
provides a higher level of insulation than the coating system in its un-reacted state.
The level of protection required from a coating is dependent on the system being protected.
For structural steel members, the systems may be specified to ensure steel temperatures
remain below the temperature at which structural failure may occur. This can give time for
the evacuation of personnel and fire fighting measures to be implemented.
In the offshore and petrochemical industries epoxy intumescent coatings have been used to
provide fire protection to steel structures for example on liquid natural gas carriers, oil drilling
ships, floating oil and gas production vessels, oil tankers and naval vessels. In such
applications, fires resulting from the ignition of hydrocarbons can be substantially more
severe in terms of temperature rise and incidental heat flux when compared with fires
involving traditional, cellulosic, building materials.
Epoxy coatings have been used successfully for decades to provide corrosion protection in
challenging environmental conditions, typically off-shore applications and the petrochemical
industry on shore. In terms of expected durability, claims are made (i.e. life to first
maintenance) that up to 25 years or more can be achieved with careful specification and
application controls.
Such coatings, combining durability, corrosion resistance and fire protection have led to
these type of product being used extensively for fire protection in the petrochemical, offshore
and marine industry.
Fire Testing of Epoxy Intumescent coating systems.

The fire resistance of a system is determined using specially designed and constructed
furnaces using specified heating conditions and performance criteria.
One critical aspect of the fire resistance testing is the controlled rate of temperature rise in
the furnace. Systems normally used in land-based buildings are tested employing the
cellulosic fire test curve which is considered to be representative of a building fire fuelled by
the typical contents of a building, traditionally regarded as being timber based the cellulosic
curve. The fire testing curve reaches a temperature of around 900 0C after 60 minutes.
However, when considering a fire resulting from the ignition of hydrocarbon based fuels, the
cellulosic curve is not considered to be representative of this type of fire.
To assess the performance of a passive fire protection system when subjected to a
hydrocarbon fire, the systems are tested under more sever conditions, for example
employing the Department of Energy hydrocarbon curve where the furnace temperature
rises rapidly at the start reaching approximately 900 0C in 3 minutes and approximately
1033 0C in 10 minutes. Other high temperature rise curves are also used, for example in the
standard UL1709 Standard for Safety Rapid Rise Fire Tests of Protection Materials for
Structural Steel.
Typical elements submitted for testing include structural steelwork, steel bulkheads and
decks.
The standard sizes of test specimens are typically 3m x 3m for bulkheads and 3m x 2.4m for
decks. There might be a structural loadbearing aspect associated with the bulkhead or deck
which would require the steel temperature to remain below critical levels in a fire to maintain
structural stability. As the test specimens are generally not tested under load, a conservative
limit is specified. For both decks and bulkheads the element provides a barrier which
prevents the spread of fire from one area to another (compartmentation). The test assesses
the ability of the barrier to prevent fire penetrating the barrier and ensures that temperatures
on the non-fire side surface do not exceed specified limits.
Tests on structural steel for use in offshore applications might include loaded steel beams
and columns, nominally 4m and 3m long respectively, together with a number of shorter
unloaded sections. Programmes for assessing the performance of protection systems for
structural steelwork are well established covering standard steel beam and column section
sizes. Columns are tested with four-sided exposure and beams generally with three-sided
exposure attached to the furnace roof.
For testing, the steel surface is prepared in accordance with manufacturers instructions.
This might include grit-blasting and priming of the steel surface before application of the
main protection layer and any protective top coat. Thermocouples are attached to the
structural steel sections to record steel temperatures and to determine when critical
temperatures are reached for evaluation of loadbearing capacity in fire conditions. Using the
data generated from the fire resistance tests, mathematical models are employed to
evaluate the overall performance of the protection system for a range of steel section sizes
and fire resistance periods.
Based on the test results, fire-protected bulkheads and decks are classified in the following
groups
Hydrocarbon fires (H0, H60 and H120), corresponding to insulation levels 0, 60 and 120
minutes insulation respectively and in all cases 120 minutes integrity and loadbearing
capacity (if appropriate).

In some applications the Reaction to Fire performance of the surface finish will need to be
considered. International Maritime Organisation (IMO) resolutions such as the SOLAS
(Safety of Life At Sea) regulations for commercial shipping or Mobile Offshore Drilling Units
(MODU) regulations for mobile offshore drilling units, contain requirements for materials to
show "low flame spread" and "not be capable of producing excessive quantities of smoke
and toxic products". In some applications, surfaces are required to be, not capable of
producing excessive quantities of smoke and toxic products. These are defined by test
requirements described in the IMO FTP Code (Fire Test Procedures). The tests ISO 1182
non-combustibility, Surface Flammability A.653(16) and Smoke & Toxicity test IMO FTP
Code Part 2, are carried out by IMO recognised laboratories such as BRE Globals reaction
to fire testing group. Normally epoxy coating systems would not satisfy all of these reactionto-fire requirements and so generally will be restricted to external locations.
Application of fire protective coatings
When preparing steelwork for the application of paint and subsequent fire testing, those
preparing for the testing will have considered how the final performance of the product will
be affected by the initial preparation and application.
Epoxy coatings are generally considered more tolerant of the condition of the substrate than
other surface finishes; however it is critical that the manufacturers are consulted on factors
such as:
-

Surface preparation and blast profile. For some products the condition of the
substrate is vital for the long term performance and/ or fire performance of the
product. If the substrate is not suitability prepared, coatings can detach leading to
early failure in a fire test.

The use and compatability of primers.The primer forms a vital function in ensuring
the protective layer is adequately adhered to the substrate. Manufacturers will
specify primers that are compatible with the protective layer and ensure that these
are used during the evaluation of the systems.

Target thickness and rate of application. The protective layer will also need to be at a
certain thickness to provide the required protection. There are cost implications as
material thickness increases - the systems may need multiple coats to build up the
required thickness which may impact on the post application inspection.

Environmental exposure. A topcoat may be necessary to ensure that the protective

layer is suitably protected in the environment in which it is installed - again this can
impact on post installation inspection programmes - the thickness of individual layers
needs to be known so that the thickness of the protective layer can be calculated.

When applying Epoxy Intumescent Coating Systems (EICS) for test, factors such as
sample temperature, air temperature and paint temperature are also often controlled.
How these parameters, usually defined by the manufacturer of the paint system, are
controlled on site can be critical to the overall performance of the system.

Third party certification of fire protection products & systems

It is recommended that any fire protection product or system is manufactured under a third
party certification scheme. BRE Global can offer some services in support of this (see
www.redbooklive.com). These schemes carry out regular audits on the factory production
control for the product and review the supporting test and assessment evidence for the
products and systems being marketed to ensure they continue to meet the appropriate

standards. In the absence of such a scheme there will be some doubt that the product tested
is the same as the product/system currently marketed.
Workmanship
No matter how extensively the coating system has been tested and assessed, it is important
that the systems are installed strictly in accordance with the manufacturers instructions, with
good quality workmanship. The manufacturers instructions must comply with the tested or
assessed methods. Therefore it is recommended that a specialist contractor who operates
under a third party certification scheme is employed to install fire protection systems. As part
of the certification scheme, regular office audits, checks on staff training and site surveillance
inspections are carried out. Therefore certification schemes such as those operated by BRE
Global will enhance confidence that the systems will be installed correctly.
Maintenance
It is important that all fire protection and corrosion protection systems are regularly inspected
for deterioration or damage and remedial work carried out promptly to ensure a continuous
level of fire protection is provided.
Conclusion
Epoxy coating systems play a vital role in protecting steel against corrosion and fire in
severe environments. Lives, property and business depend on such systems and therefore
the greatest of care must be taken to ensure their performance is adequately tested and
assessed and the quality of their manufacture and application carefully monitored. Once
applied, they must be subjected to regular inspections and maintenance to ensure than
adequate level of protection is maintained.