Influence of Plasticizer Molecular Weight On Plasticizer Retention in PVC Geomembranes
Influence of Plasticizer Molecular Weight On Plasticizer Retention in PVC Geomembranes
FS
OO
ABSTRACT: Plasticizers are used to make PVC flexible so it can be used as a geomembrane.
Plasticizers can migrate from PVC geomembranes over time because of contact with air, liquid,
and/or an absorbent solid material. Plasticizer migration can reduce the flexibility of PVC
geomembranes, resulting in brittle behavior. This paper discusses the three mechanisms of
plasticizer migration and the factors influencing these mechanisms, such as plasticizer molecular
weight and linearity of the plasticizer. Field case histories are used to show how these mechanisms
influence plasticizer retention in PVC geomembranes. Finally, it is recommended that a minimum
average plasticizer molecular weight of 400 be used to ensure long-term plasticizer retention and
adequate field performance of PVC geomembranes. The weighted-average method for calculating
the average molecular weight is recommended when two or more plasticizers are used in the PVC
geomembrane formulation.
KEYWORDS: Geosynthetics, PVC, Geomembrane, Plasticizer, Retention, Loss, Migration, Volatility,
Molecular weight, Linearity, Branchness
PR
REFERENCE: Stark, T. D., Choi, H. & Diebel, P. W. (2005). Influence of plasticizer molecular
weight on plasticizer retention in PVC geomembrane. Geosynthetics International, 12, No. 2, 000000.
1. INTRODUCTION
2. FUNDAMENTALS OF PVC
GEOMEMBRANE
2.1. PVC geomembrane formulation
A polymer is a large molecule built up by a series of small
and simple repeating chemical units. These repeating units
are called monomers. In PVC, the repeating unit is the
vinyl chloride monomer. The chemical and structural
1
Stark et al.
FS
2.2. Plasticization
3. MECHANISMS AFFECTING
PLASTICIZER RETENTION
OO
PR
CH2 O
CO
CH2 CH2
CH2
Mirror image
32
CH2
(a)
CH3
CH2
CO
CH2 CH
CO
CH2 CH
CH2
CH3
(b)
O
O
CH
CH3
CH3
(c)
OO
FS
PR
4
Table 1. Properties of commonly used plasticizers (from Stepek and Daoust 1983)
Plasticizers
MW
Volatility plasticizer
loss (%)
312
282
278
334
363
391
391
390
418
446
326
337
368
362
258
346
314
426
398
314
286
7.7
16.7
44
9.5
11.5
4.3
4.6
4.5
3.5
1.8
3.6
1
1.13
0.09
1.72
0.25
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.08
0.01
0.03
0.02
0.04
0.03
0.02
63
36.9
3.34
1.22
4.2
5.4
5.5
23.7
0.015
0.55
0.28
2.83
OO
Miscellaneous plasticizers
FS
Group
PR
13
Stark et al.
Water extraction
(% loss)
4. FIELD OBSERVATIONS OF
PLASTICIZER RETENTION
Many researchers (Morrison and Starbuck 1984; Levin
and Hammond 1990; Fayoux et al. 1993; Giroud and
Tisinger 1993; Hammond et al. 1993; Morrison and
Comer 1995; Young and Kovach 1995) have investigated
the mechanism, rate, and factors influencing plasticizer
retention in PVC geomembranes. The following paragraphs present a summary of these studies.
Giroud and Tisinger (1993) summarize plasticizer retention in PVC geomembranes in the following three cases:
canal liners in the Western USA (Morrison and Starbuck
1984), a landfill cover in Florida (Levin and Hammond
1990; Hammond et al. 1993), and evaporation ponds in
the Sahara Desert (Giroud and Tisinger 1993). The case
histories are used to develop a relationship between
plasticizer loss ratio and exposure time for these three
cases. Figure 2 presents trend lines for each site, relating
0.25 mm
0.5 m
1 mm
50
40
6
30
20
0.
0.2
5m
10
0
6
8
10 12 14 16
Duration of exposure (years)
18
20
22
OO
(2)
PR
CP0 CP
CP0 1 CP
1 mm
60
FS
70
80
60
40
20
10
15
Duration of exposure (years)
20
25
Stark et al.
80
60
40
20
10
15
Duration of exposure (years)
20
25
OO
FS
100
PR
mm
60
0.5
70
50
0.25 mm
0.25 mm
40
30
m
0.5 m 3
20
10
0
8 10 12 14 16 18
Duration of exposure (years)
20
22
24
OO
installed without an overlying soil cover, and was maintained under water while in service. The physical property
and chemical tests indicate that the liner remained functional for the 15-year service life. Young and Kovach (1995)
conclude that it is beneficial to maintain the PVC geomembrane under water to reduce the amount of UV light reaching
the geomembrane. Of course, UV degradation is not an issue
if the PVC is covered with a protective soil layer.
Fayoux et al. (1993) investigate a 1 mm thick PVC
geomembrane excavated from a pond liner subjected to
domestic landfill leachate in France after 10 years service.
The initial plasticizer content is 33.6%, and the plasticizer
retention was assessed for different field conditions.
Fayoux et al. (1993) show that plasticizer loss from a
sample immersed in leachate for 10 years is much less
than the samples exposed to air for 10 years. Thus
exposure to air causes more volatile loss and UV degradation than the samples immersed in leachate for the same
period. The exposure to leachate did not result in a high
loss of plasticizer. The plasticizer loss ratio of 37% while
exposed to air was much greater than the plasticizer loss
ratio of 16% while exposed to the leachate.
Stark et al. (2002) investigate a 0.5 mm thick fish-grade
PVC geomembrane exhumed from aquaculture ponds. The
ponds were constructed in 1971 for the W. K. Kellogg
Biological Research Station in Hickory Corner, Michigan.
After nearly 30 years service in an aquatic environment,
laboratory tensile testing shows that the tensile behavior is
well within current specifications for 0.5 mm thick PVC
geomembranes, and this PVC geomembrane retains flexibility and strength, enabling it to perform as a successful
water barrier. This indicates that plasticizer retention in an
aquatic environment is not a problem, even in a 0.5 mm
thick PVC geomembrane.
Once a PVC geomembrane manufactured with compatible plasticizers is buried and protected by a soil layer,
plasticizer loss due to volatility is not significant because
there is not enough free air to cause the plasticizer to
evaporate, and the soil temperature is lower and more
constant than in air. For this reason, open gravel is not a
suitable cover material. However, there is usually a
geotextile between the gravel and the PVC geomembrane.
FS
80
PR
5. FACTORS CONTROLLING
PLASTICIZER RETENTION
External or environmental factors that influence plasticizer
retention include temperature, chemicals, microorganisms,
and the characteristic of the contact material, such as air,
liquid, or a solid (Nass and Heiberger 1986; Giroud and
Tisinger 1993; Wilson 1995). Internal or intrinsic factors
controlling plasticizer retention are related to the molecular properties of the plasticizer. Presuming the mutual
compatibility between the plasticizers and PVC resin is
satisfied, there are three relevant molecular properties of a
plasticizer that control plasticizer retention (Wilson 1995):
1.
2.
3.
molecular weight;
linearity; and
polarity.
Stark et al.
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
250
300
350
400
Plasticizer molecular weight
450
0
250
300
350
400
Plasticizer molecular weight
450
0.5
PR
OO
FS
0.4
0.3
0.2
BBP
DOP
0.1
DIDP
TOTM
0
250
300
350
400
450
500
Plasticizer molecular weight
550
600
6. DESIGN SPECIFICATION
OO
PR
FS
390 3 30 446 3 20
412
50
(4)
10
Stark et al.
FS
8. CONCLUSIONS
OO
PR
1.
2.
3.
15
Certified properties
16
Thickness
ASTM
PVC 10
PVC 20
PVC 30
PVC 40
PVC 50
PVC 60
D5199
10 + 0.5 mil
0.25 + 0.013mm
20 + 1 mil
0.51 + 0.03 mm
30 + 1.5 mil
0.76 + 0.04 mm
40 + 2 mil
1.02 + 0.05 mm
50 + 2.5 mil
1.27 + 0.06 mm
60 + 3 mil
1.52 + 0.08 mm
Tensile properties3
D882d
Min
Strength at break
Elongation
Modulus at 100%
Tear strength
Dimensional stability
Low-temperature impact
Index propertiese
Specific gravity
Water extraction percent loss (max)
Volatile loss
Soil burial
Break strength
Elongation
Modulus at 100%
Hydrostatic resistance
Average plasticizer molecular weight
Seam strengths
Shear strength3
Peel strength3
17
18
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
D1004d
Min
D1204d
Max Chg
D1790d
Pass
D792
Typical
D1239d Max loss
D1203d
Max loss
G160d Max chg
D751d
Min
D2138 and D2124
D882d
Min
D882d Min
OO
/24 lbf/in
4.2 kN/m
250%
10 lbf/in
1.8 kN/m
2.5 lbf
11 N
4%
48 lbf/in
8.4 kN/m
360%
21 lbf/in
3.7 kN/m
6 lbf
27 N
4%
73 lbf/in
12.8 kN/m
380%
32 lbf/in
5.6 kN/m
8 lbf
35 N
3%
97 lbf/in
17.0 kN/m
430%
40 lbf/in
7.0 kN/m
10 lbf
44 N
3%
116 lbf/in
20.3 kN/m
430%
50 lbf/in
8.8 kN/m
13 lbf
58 N
3%
137 lbf/in
24.0 kN/m
450%
60 lbf/in
10.5 kN/m
15 lbf
67 N
3%
108F
238C
158F
268C
208F
298C
208F
298C
208F
298C
208F
298C
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
0.15%
1.5%
0.15%
0.9%
0.15%
0.7%
0.20%
0.5%
0.20%
0.5%
0.20%
0.5%
5%
20%
20%
42 lbf/in2
290 kPa
. 400
5%
20%
20%
68 lbf/in2
470 kPa
. 400
5%
20%
20%
100 lbf/in2
690 kPa
. 400
5%
20%
20%
120 lbf/in2
830 kPa
. 400
5%
20%
20%
150 lbf/in2
1030 kPa
. 400
5%
20%
20%
180 lbf/in2
1240 kPa
. 400
20 lbf/in
3.47 kN/m
10 lbf/in
1.8 kN/m
38.4 lbf/in
6.7 kN/m
12.5 lbf/in
2.2 kN/m
58.4 lbf/in
10 kN/m
15 lbf/in
2.6 kN/m
77.6 lbf/in
14 kN/m
15 lbf/in
2.6 kN/m
96 lbf/in
17 kN/m
15 lbf/in
2.6 kN/m
116 lbf/in
20kN/m
15 lbf/in
2.6 kN/m
FS
14
PR
Table 2. PGI-1104 material specification for flexible PVC geomembranes for containment
11
12
Stark et al.
NOTATIONS
Basic SI units are given in parentheses.
CDIDP
ABBREVIATIONS
dioctyl phthalate
diisodecyl phthalate
diisononyl phthalate
gas chromatograph
gas chromatograph mass spectrophotometer
high-density polyethylene
linear low-density polyethylene
molecular weight
PVC Geomembrane Institute
parts per hundred of resin
polyvinyl chloride
ultra-violet
PR
DOP
DIDP
DINP
GC
GCMS
HDPE
LLDPE
MW
PGI
phr
PVC
UV
OO
REFERENCES
5
FS
The Editors welcome discussion in all papers published in Geosynthetics International. Please email your contribution to
discussion@geosynthetics-international.com by ???.
7
8
10
11
12