Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Quiz

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 18

Quiz 2 - due 7pm May 22

ISB

5/19/16, 9:22 PM

" My Dashboard

# My Courses

You are logged in as Mark Finn (Log out)

Home / My courses / ISB Mohali Campus / Post Graduate Programme in Management /


Academic Year 2016-17 / Term 1 / FADM_171_Moh / Topic 12 / Quiz 2 - due 7pm May 22 / Preview

Quiz navigation
1

9 10

11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30

Question

Mill Valley Analytics, Inc. is a marketing analytics

Not yet

company based in northern California that recently

answered

listed its common stock on NASDAQ in an initial

Marked out of

public offering (IPO). The registration documents for


the IPO provided a balance sheet constructed as of

6.00

December 31, 2015. This balance sheet included two

Flag

customer lists, each with a value of $2 million. Which

question

of the following is least likely to be a correct

Edit question

statement about these intangible assets?

31 32 33

Select one:

Finish attempt ...

a. One of the aforementioned customer lists was

Start a new preview

acquired directly from another company.


b. One of the aforementioned customer lists was
acquired as part of the acquisition of another

Navigation

company.
c. One of the aforementioned customer lists was

! Current course

assembled by employees of Mill Valley's

! FADM_171_Moh
Participants

marketing department.

! General

d. As of 31 December 2015, Mill Valley Analytics

! Class Project

may have possessed other customer lists that

- due May 27 at

weren't included in the 2014 year-end balance

5pm

sheet.

! SESSION-1
! SESSION-2
! SESSION-3

Question

! SESSION-4

Not yet

Capitan operating system (the successor to Yosemite)

! SESSION-5

answered

was far enough along in its technical development

! SESSION-6
! SESSION-7
! SESSION-8
! SESSION-9
! SESSION-10
! Topic 12

Marked out of
1.00
Flag
question
Edit question

On April 1st, 2015, Apple announced that its new El

that the company would begin capitalizing the


systems development costs in the third and fourth
quarters of 2015. (Apples fiscal year ended on
September 30, 2015.) Assume for simplicity that El
Capitan began shipping on October 1st and that no
further development work is needed after that date.

http://lms2.exchange.isb.edu/mod/quiz/attempt.php?attempt=31887&category=589%2C70531&lastchanged=9826#q3

Page 1 of 18

Quiz 2 - due 7pm May 22

5/19/16, 9:22 PM

Quiz 2 - due

The amortization horizon for capitalized software

7pm May

costs is three years. Which of the following

22

statements incorrectly describes the accounting


effects of Apples decision to capitalize development

! My courses

costs in the third and fourth quarters of the 2015


fiscal year?

Administration

Select one:

% Quiz

a. The decision to capitalize El Capitans

administration

development costs in Q3 and Q4 increases

Edit settings

reported assets in the balance sheet dated

Group

September 30, 2015.

overrides

b. The decision to capitalize El

User

Capitan's development costs in Q3 and Q4 will

overrides

increase reported assets in the balance sheet

Edit quiz

dated September 30, 2016.

Preview

c. The decision to capitalize El Capitans

! Results

development costs in Q3 and Q4 lowers reported

Locally

net income in the income statement for the fiscal

assigned roles

year ending September 30, 2015.

Permissions
Check
permissions

Question

Filters

Not yet

treatment of Research and Development

Logs

answered

expenditures. Under the company's current policies,

Backup

Marked out of

all research and development expenditures are

Restore

8.00

expensed. Dr. Reddys Laboratories Ltd. report the

! Question
bank
! Course
administration
! Switch role
to...
! My profile
settings

Flag
question
Edit question

The next two questions pertain to Dr.Reddys

following information on their income statement.


in Rs. millions

2013

2014

2015

Research and

3552

2462

4232

1629

9327

4678

Development Expense
Net Profit

The following information is extracted from the


balance sheet
in Rs. millions

2014

2015

Total Assets

85,919

85,445

Total Stockholders Equity

41,578

47,067

Suppose the company is considering capitalizing (as


opposed to expensing) research and development
costs. G. V. Prasad, the CEO, has asked you to
evaluate the financial statement implications of this
alternative accounting treatment.
http://lms2.exchange.isb.edu/mod/quiz/attempt.php?attempt=31887&category=589%2C70531&lastchanged=9826#q3

Page 2 of 18

Quiz 2 - due 7pm May 22

5/19/16, 9:22 PM

In particular, Mr. Prasad is interested in knowing how


the financial statements for 2015 would have looked
had the company ALWAYS (i.e., from the beginning of
time) used this alternative capitalizing treatment.
For the purpose of answering the following questions,
you may assume that
i) capitalized research and development expenses
would be amortized (depreciated) over 2 years;
ii) research and development expenses occur at the
end of the year;
iii) there are no tax effects.
Under the accounting alternative that Dr.Reddys Labs
had ALWAYS capitalized research and development
expenses, net profit for fiscal 2015 would have been:
Select one:
a. Higher by 3,532
b. Lower by 3,532
c. Higher by 1,225
d. Higher by 5,480
e. Lower by 1,225
f. None of the above

Question

Under the accounting alternative that Dr.Reddys Labs

Not yet

had ALWAYS capitalized research and development

answered

expenditures, the Total Assets at the end of fiscal

Marked out of
5.00
Flag
question
Edit question

2015 would have been:


Select one:
a. Higher by 3,532
b. Lower by 3,532
c. Higher by 4,763
d. Lower by 4,763
e. Higher by 5,463
f. None of the above

http://lms2.exchange.isb.edu/mod/quiz/attempt.php?attempt=31887&category=589%2C70531&lastchanged=9826#q3

Page 3 of 18

Quiz 2 - due 7pm May 22

5/19/16, 9:22 PM

Question

An adjacent link provides the most recently published

Not yet

annual report for Jaguar Land Rover Automotive plc

answered

(JLR). Tata Motors purchased JLR from Ford in 2008.

Marked out of

It remains a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tata Motors.


JLRs accounting policies footnote reports that the

1.00

company capitalizes product development costs

Flag

incurred on new vehicle platforms, engines,

question

transmissions, and new products. (p.112) What was

Edit question

the net book value of JLRs product development


costs, both in-progress and capitalized, as of March
31, 2015?
Select one:
a. Less than 2 billion
b. Between 2 billion and Less than 3 billion
c. Between 3 billion and Less than 4 billion
d. Greater than or equal to 4 billion

Question

What percent was the combined amount of in-

Not yet

progress and capitalized development costs (net of

answered

accumulated amortization) of JLRs total balance

Marked out of
1.00

sheet assets as of March 31, 2015?


Select one:

Flag

a. Less than 5%

question
Edit question

b. Greater than or equal to 5% but less than


10%
c. Greater than or equal to 10% but less than
15%
d. Greater than or equal to 15% but less than
20%
e. Greater than or equal to 20%

Question

JLR reported pre-tax income of 2,614 million in

Not yet

Fiscal 2014-15. Assuming that JLR had always

answered

expensed development costs rather than capitalized

Marked out of
1.00

them, would pre-tax income have been higher or


lower in Fiscal 2014-15?

Flag

http://lms2.exchange.isb.edu/mod/quiz/attempt.php?attempt=31887&category=589%2C70531&lastchanged=9826#q3

Page 4 of 18

Quiz 2 - due 7pm May 22

5/19/16, 9:22 PM

True or False: FY2014-15 pre-tax income would have

question
Edit question

been higher under expensing.


Select one:
True
False

Question

Compute magnitude by which pre-tax income would

Not yet

have differed between capitalizing and expensing

answered

considering only two effects: The amount of

Marked out of

development costs capitalized in FY2014-15


(Footnote 9) and the amount of amortization of

1.00

development costs in 2014-15 (Footnote 16). There

Flag

are second order effects connected to interest

question

capitalization and taxation that you should not

Edit question

consider in making your computation. Select the


interval below that contains the magnitude of the
difference.
Select one:
a. Had JLR expensed development costs, pre-tax
income would differ by less than 125 million
b. Had JLR expensed development costs, pre-tax
income would differ by between 125 million and
250 million
c. Had JLR expensed development costs, pre-tax
income would differ by between 250 million and
375 million
d. Had JLR expensed development costs, pre-tax
income would differ by between 375 million and
500 million
e. Had JLR expensed development costs, pre-tax
income would differ by more than 500 million

Question

JLRs accounting policies footnote states that these

Not yet

costs are amortized over between 2 and 10 years.

answered

Estimate the average useful life of product

Marked out of
1.00
Flag

development costs by dividing average capitalized


product development costs by the amortization
expense for fiscal 2014-15. Compute average
capitalized product development costs as a simple

http://lms2.exchange.isb.edu/mod/quiz/attempt.php?attempt=31887&category=589%2C70531&lastchanged=9826#q3

Page 5 of 18

Quiz 2 - due 7pm May 22

5/19/16, 9:22 PM

average of balances at the beginning and end of the

question
Edit question

fiscal year. Round your answer to a whole number of


years (e.g., 4 years, 5 years, etc.) All of the
information you need for these calculations is
provided in Footnote 16.
Select one:
a. 3 years
b. 4 years
c. 5 years
d. 6 years
e. greater than 6 years

Question

10

Siam Cement PCL bought a welding machine on

Not yet

January 1, 2011 for 4 million Thai baht and

answered

immediately put it into service. At that time, the

Marked out of
1.00
Flag
question
Edit question

company estimated that the useful life and salvage


value of all of its welding machines were 8 years and
10% of acquisition cost, respectively. On January 1,
2015, the company reassessed its depreciation
estimates for welding machines, increasing the useful
to 9 years and reducing the salvage value to 5% of
acquisition cost. Siam Cement applied these changes
of estimate all of its welding machines. By how much
did the change in depreciation policy increase or
decrease annual depreciation on the welding machine
purchased for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2015?
Select one:
a. The change in estimate decreased annual
depreciation for the machine in question by more
than 500,000 baht per year.
b. The change in estimate increased annual
depreciation for the machine in question by more
than 500,000 baht per year.
c. The change in estimate increased annual
depreciation for the machine in question, but by
less than or equal to 500,000 baht per year.
d. The change in estimate decreased annual
depreciation for the machine in question, but by

http://lms2.exchange.isb.edu/mod/quiz/attempt.php?attempt=31887&category=589%2C70531&lastchanged=9826#q3

Page 6 of 18

Quiz 2 - due 7pm May 22

5/19/16, 9:22 PM

less than or equal to 500,000 baht per year.


e. The change in estimate left annual
depreciation for the machine unchanged.

Question

11

Hitachi Zosen purchased a boiler for 7,000,000. The

Not yet

boiler was expected to last eight years, with an

answered

estimated residual value of 600,000. After five

Marked out of

years, the company made improvements to the boiler


at a cost of 1,500,000. The improvements improved

5.00

the boilers thermal efficiency and reduced carbon

Flag

emissions. The improvements also extended the

question

useful life by two years. What was annual

Edit question

depreciation expense after the improvements were


carried out?
Select one:
a. 660,000
b. 720,000
c. 780,000
d. 900,000
e. None of the above

Question

12

For questions 12 through 14, refer to the following

Not yet

info:

answered

Aditya Mills Ltd. is an Indian company that adopted

Marked out of

IFRS in 2009. In May of 2016, the company sold its

1.00

stock in H.L.L. for Rs.27 lakhs. The investment was

Flag
question
Edit question

purchased in October 2015 and was accounted for as


Available for Sale. Aditya Mills Ltd, recorded the
following journal entry at the time of the sale.
Cash (+A)

27,00,000

Unrealized Gains on
Marketable Securities

9,00,000

(-SE)
Marketable
Securities

23,00,000

(-A)
Realized
Gains on
Marketable
http://lms2.exchange.isb.edu/mod/quiz/attempt.php?attempt=31887&category=589%2C70531&lastchanged=9826#q3

13,00,000
Page 7 of 18

Quiz 2 - due 7pm May 22

5/19/16, 9:22 PM

Securities
(+R,+SE)

What was the original acquisition cost of the


investment in H.L.L.?
Select one:
a. Rs.10,00,000
b. Rs.13,00,000
c. Rs.14,00,000
d. Rs.21,00,000
e. None of the above.

Question

13

What was the effect of the investment in H.L.L,

Not yet

on the pre-tax income of Aditya Mills Ltd. for the

answered

2015-16 fiscal year? Aditya Mills Ltd closes its

Marked out of

books annually on March 31st. (Note: The fiscal


year is correct.)

1.00
Flag

Select one:

question

a. The sale had no effect on 2015-16 pre-tax

Edit question

income.
b. The sale increased 2015-16 pre-tax income by
Rs.4,00,000.
c. The sale increased 2015-16 pre-tax income by
Rs.9,00,000.
d. The sale increased 2015-16 pre-tax income by
Rs.13,00,000.
e. The sale increased 2015-16 pre-tax income by
Rs.14,00,000.

Question

14

Refer to the following portions of the 2017-16

Not yet

financial statements of Aditya Mills Ltd, as well as the

answered

information provided above. Apart from the

Marked out of
1.00
Flag

aforementioned sale of stock in H.L.L., Aditya MIlls


Ltd sold no other marketable equity securities in fiscal
2016-17.

question

http://lms2.exchange.isb.edu/mod/quiz/attempt.php?attempt=31887&category=589%2C70531&lastchanged=9826#q3

Page 8 of 18

Quiz 2 - due 7pm May 22

5/19/16, 9:22 PM

Edit question

BALANCE SHEET
Aditya Mills Ltd.
March 31, 2017
Rs lakhs

2017 2016

Assets
...
Marketable Equity
Securities
...

...

...

134

128

...

...

...

...

35

34

Shareholders' Equity
...
Unrealized Gain on
Marketable Equity
Securities

These are the only securities disposed during the


year. By how much were marketable equity securities
written up or down in value at the end of 2016-17?

Select one:
a. There was no write-up of marketable equity
securities in 2016-17
b. Marketable equity securities were written-up
by Rs.1,00,000 in 2016-17.
c. Marketable equity securities were written-up
by Rs.4,00,000 in 2016-17.
d. Marketable equity securities were written-up
by Rs.9,00,000 in 2016-17.
e. Marketable equity securities were written-up
by Rs.10,00,000 in 2016-17.

Question

15

For questions 15 & 16, refer to the following portions

Not yet

of the 2015-16 financial statements of Banzai Toys

answered

Ltd. Banzai Toys purchased 25% of Gundam

Marked out of
1.00
Flag
question
Edit question

Enterprises in 1999 and has maintained a constant


25% ownership stake in this affiliate since that date.
millions of Japanese
yen

2016 2015

Assets (as of March

http://lms2.exchange.isb.edu/mod/quiz/attempt.php?attempt=31887&category=589%2C70531&lastchanged=9826#q3

Page 9 of 18

Quiz 2 - due 7pm May 22

5/19/16, 9:22 PM

31)
...

...

Investment in Gundam
Enteprises

...

13,400 12,800

...

...

...

...

...

Income Statement
(for fiscal years
ending March 31)
...
Equity in Earnings of
Gundam Enterprises

3,500 1,500

Compute the total size of dividends paid by Gundam


Enterprises in 2015-16.

Select one:
a. Gundam Enterprises paid a dividend of 2,000
million in 2015-16.
b. Gundam Enterprises paid a dividend of 2,900
million in 2015-16.
c. Gundam Enterprises paid a dividend of 5,600
million in 2015-16.
d. Gundam Enterprises paid a dividend of 11,600
million in 2015-16.
e. None of the above.

Question

16

What was the net income of Gundam Enterprises


for 2015-16?

Not yet
answered
Marked out of

a. 14,000 million

1.00

b. 4,000 million

Flag
question

c. 3,500 million

Edit question

Question

Select one:

17

Not yet

d. None of the above.

For questions 17 through 19, refer to the following


info:

answered

http://lms2.exchange.isb.edu/mod/quiz/attempt.php?attempt=31887&category=589%2C70531&lastchanged=9826#q3

Page 10 of 18

Quiz 2 - due 7pm May 22

5/19/16, 9:22 PM

Marked out of

Ladakh Trekking Outfitters purchased a 100%

1.00

ownership interest in of the Indus Whitewater for 35


lakhs on May 1st. At the time of the purchase, Indus

Flag

Whitewater's assets and liabilities totaled 75 lakhs

question

and 50 lakhs, respectively. Appraisers determined

Edit question

that the fair values of all specifically identifiable


assets and liabilities equalled their book values in
Indus Whitewater's preacquisition balance sheet. How
much goodwill did Ladakh Trekking Outfitters record
as a result of the Indus Whitewater acquisition?
Select one:
a. 10 lakhs
b. 35 lakhs
c. Ladakh Trekking Outfitters recorded no
goodwill as a result of this acquisition
d. 5 lakhs

Question

18

Assume the same facts as above with one exception.

Not yet

Appraisers found a self-developed customer list that

answered

had not been recorded in Indus Whitewater's

Marked out of

preacquisition balance sheet. The appraisers


estimated the value of this list to be 5 lakhs. Under

1.00

this new scenario, how much goodwill did Ladakh

Flag

Trekking Outfitters record as a result of the Indus

question

Whitewater acquisition?

Edit question

Select one:
a. 5 lakhs
b. Ladakh Trekking Outfitters recorded no
goodwill as a result of this acquisition
c. 10 lakhs
d. 40 lakhs

Question

19

Assume the same facts as in Question 17 (above)

Not yet

with two modifications. Assume appraisers found a

answered

self-developed customer list that had not been

Marked out of
1.00
Flag

recorded in Indus Whitewater's preacquisition balance


sheet. The appraisers estimated the value of this list
to be 5 lakhs. Also assume that in connection with

http://lms2.exchange.isb.edu/mod/quiz/attempt.php?attempt=31887&category=589%2C70531&lastchanged=9826#q3

Page 11 of 18

Quiz 2 - due 7pm May 22

5/19/16, 9:22 PM

the acquisition, Ladakh Trekking Outfitters hired

question
Edit question

Plains Associates to prepare a valuation of Indus


Whitewater's human resources asset. Plains
Associates estimated that the human resources
asset's value to be 5 lakhs. Given these two
modifications, how much goodwill did Ladakh
Trekking Outfitters record as a result of the Indus
Whitewater acquisition?
Select one:
a. Ladakh Trekking Outfitters recorded no
goodwill as a result of this acquisition
b. 40 lakhs
c. 5 lakhs
d. 10 lakhs

Question

20

On 01 January 2015, Mendoza Company paid 16

Not yet

million pesos for 20,000 shares of Molina's voting

answered

common stock, a 20% interest in the company. The

Marked out of

stock purchase caused Mendoza to gain significant


influence over Molina operating decisions. Molina

1.00

distributed a dividend of 20 pesos per share during

Flag

the year and reported net income of 5.6 million pesos

question

for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015. The

Edit question

fair value of Mendoza's investment in Molina on this


date was 18 million pesos. How much income should
Mendoza recognize for its investment in Molina for
2015?
Select one:
a. 400,000
b. 720,000
c. 1,120,000
d. 2,000,000
e. 2,400,000
f. None of the above.

Question

21

Not yet

What was the carrying value of Mendoza's investment


in Molina on December 31, 2015?

answered

http://lms2.exchange.isb.edu/mod/quiz/attempt.php?attempt=31887&category=589%2C70531&lastchanged=9826#q3

Page 12 of 18

Quiz 2 - due 7pm May 22

5/19/16, 9:22 PM

Marked out of
1.00

Select one:
a. 16,000,000

Flag

b. 16,720,000

question

c. 17,120,000

Edit question

d. 18,000,000
e. None of the above.

Question

22

On 01 January 2013, SK Enterprises paid 16 million

Not yet

RMB (China's currency) for 20,000 shares of a special

answered

class of Wonder Automotive's common stock, a 20%

Marked out of

interest in the company. Due to restrictions on the


use of the stock, the purchase did not give SK

1.00

Enterprises significant influence over Wonder Auto;

Flag

SK Enterprises chose to account for the investment

question

as available-for-sale. Wonder Automotive distributed

Edit question

a dividend of 20 RMB per share during the year and


reported net income of 5.6 million RMB for the fiscal
year ending December 31, 2013. The fair value of SK
Enterprises' investment in Wonder Auto on this date
was 18 million RMB. How much income should SK
Enterprises recognize for its 'Investment in Wonder
Automotive' in it's 2013 income statement ?
Select one:
a. 400,000
b. 720,000
c. 1,120,000
d. 2,000,000
e. 2,400,000
f. None of the above.

Question

23

What was the carrying value of SK Enterprises'

Not yet

investment in Wonder Automotive on December 31,

answered

2013?

Marked out of
5.00
Flag
question

Select one:
a. 16,000,000
b. 16,720,000

http://lms2.exchange.isb.edu/mod/quiz/attempt.php?attempt=31887&category=589%2C70531&lastchanged=9826#q3

Page 13 of 18

Quiz 2 - due 7pm May 22

5/19/16, 9:22 PM

Edit question

c. 17,120,000
d. 18,000,000
e. None of the above.

Question

24

On April 1st, 2015, the trading operation of Pramod

Not yet

Investments paid 16 million rupees for 20,000 shares

answered

of a special class of Ravi Corporation's common stock,

Marked out of

a 20% interest in the company. Due to the nature of

1.00

its business, Pramod is required to account for the


shares of Ravi using the trading method. Continue to

Flag

assume that Ravi distributed a dividend of 20 Rs. per

question

share during the year and reported net income of 5.6

Edit question

million Rs. for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2016.
The fair value of Pramod's investment in Ravi on this
date was 18 million Rs. How much income should
Pramod recognize for its investment in Ravi for the
2015-16 fiscal year?
Select one:
a. 400,000
b. 720,000
c. 1,120,000
d. 2,000,000
e. 2,400,000
f. None of the above

Question

25

Not yet

What was the carrying value of Pramod's 'Investment


in Ravi' on March 31, 2016?

answered
Marked out of
1.00
Flag
question
Edit question

Select one:
a. None of the above
b. 18,000,000
c. 16,00,000
d. 17,120,000
e. 16,720,000

http://lms2.exchange.isb.edu/mod/quiz/attempt.php?attempt=31887&category=589%2C70531&lastchanged=9826#q3

Page 14 of 18

Quiz 2 - due 7pm May 22

5/19/16, 9:22 PM

Question

26

On April 1, 2016, Preeti Ltd. acquired 100% of the

Not yet

common stock of Sunil Company for Rs.600 million

answered

cash. The balance sheet of Preeti Ltd. as of March 31,

Marked out of

2016 contained Rs.2.4 billion in total assets and


Rs.800 million in total liabilities. Shareholders' equity

1.00

of Sunil Company on March 31, 2016 equaled $350

Flag

million, composed of Rs.250 million in common stock

question

and Rs.100 million in retained earnings. Preeti

Edit question

Ltd. determined that the identifiable assets and


liabilities of Sunil Company were stated at fair value
on the date of acquisition, with the exception of the
following: The company's PPE had a fair value that is
60 million higher than its net book value in Sunil
Company's accounts. A customer list was not
recorded in Sunil Company's books but had a fair
value of 40 million. Sunil Company's estimate of
allowance for uncollectible accounts was determined
to be 10 million less than its fair value. How much
goodwill did Preeti Ltd. record for the Sunil
Company acquisition?
Select one:
a. No goodwill was recorded.
b. Rs.140 million
c. Rs.160 million
d. Rs.250 million
e. None of the above.

Question

27

Prospero Group owns 80% of the common shares of

Not yet

Sebastian Company. The other 20% of Sebastian's

answered

common shares trade on the London Stock Exchange

Marked out of
1.00
Flag
question
Edit question

and are held by ordinary retail investors. Prospero


Group published the following data in its 2014 annual
report regarding the stand-alone operations of
Prospero and Sebastian. (All figures are in millions.)
Data from Prospero Group's 2014 Annual Report
Prospero and Sebastian Corporations December 31,
2014
Prospero Sebastian
Stand-alone net profit

Corp.

Corp.

500

150

http://lms2.exchange.isb.edu/mod/quiz/attempt.php?attempt=31887&category=589%2C70531&lastchanged=9826#q3

Page 15 of 18

Quiz 2 - due 7pm May 22

5/19/16, 9:22 PM

Common Shares outstanding


(constant during the year)

80

35*

* includes shares of Sebastian


owned by Prospero

Assume that Sebastian was Prospero's only subsidiary


in 2014. Also assume that neither company is
required to pay taxes and that there are no group
level revenues or expenses that are omitted from
stand-alone profit. What would Prospero Group report
as its consolidated income for 2014?
Select one:
a. 500
b. 600
c. 620
d. 650
e. None of the above.

Question

28

What would Prospero Group report as "Profit

Not yet

attributable to equity holders of Prospero Group" on

answered

its 2014 income statement?

Marked out of
1.00

Select one:
a. 500

Flag

b. 600

question
Edit question

c. 620
d. 650

Question

29

The adjacent link provides selections from the most

Not yet

recent 10-K of Medtronic, one of the world's largest

answered

developers of medical devices. Medtronic was

Marked out of
1.00
Flag
question
Edit question

founded in 1949 in Fridley, Minnesota and continues


to base its operations in the Minneapolis metropolitan
area. In its 2014 10-K, Medtronic listed its address
as 710 Medtronic Parkway, Minneapolis, Minnesota
55432. What city is currently the home of its principal
executive office?

http://lms2.exchange.isb.edu/mod/quiz/attempt.php?attempt=31887&category=589%2C70531&lastchanged=9826#q3

Page 16 of 18

Quiz 2 - due 7pm May 22

5/19/16, 9:22 PM

Select one:
a. Minneapolis
b. Zurich
c. London
d. Dublin
e. Nassau, Bahamas

Question

30

Medtronic completed its purchase of Covidien plc on

Not yet

January 26, 2015. What was the fair value of the

answered

purchased consideration (i.e., the purchase price)

Marked out of

paid or promised by Medtronic to Covidien's


shareholders to buy the company? (Note: Include the

1.00

fair value of all purchase consideration as measured

Flag

by GAAP, not just cash consideration.)

question
Edit question

Select one:
a. More than $50 billion
b. Less than or equal to $50 billion, but greater
than $45 billion
c. Less than or equal to $45 billion, but greater
than $40 billion
d. Less than or equal to $40 billion, but greater
than $35 billion
e. Less than or equal to $35 billion

Question

31

Which of the following asset classes on the balance

Not yet

sheet experienced the largest percentage increase

answered

due to the Covidien acquisition?

Marked out of
1.00
Flag
question
Edit question

Select one:
a. Accounts Receivable
b. Inventories
c. Property, Plant, and Equipment
d. Goodwill
e. Intangible Assets (other than Goodwill)

http://lms2.exchange.isb.edu/mod/quiz/attempt.php?attempt=31887&category=589%2C70531&lastchanged=9826#q3

Page 17 of 18

Quiz 2 - due 7pm May 22

5/19/16, 9:22 PM

Question

32

$26.3 billion of specifically identifiable intangible

Not yet

assets were added to Medtronic's balance sheet in the

answered

Covidien acquisition. Which of the following intangible

Marked out of
1.00

asset classes contributed the majority of this value?


Select one:

Flag

a. Customer-related intangibles

question
Edit question

b. Technology-based intangibles
c. Trade names
d. In-process R&D

Question

33

GAAP requires companies to track goodwill and test it

Not yet

for impairment at the business unit level. They are

answered

not required to track goodwill acquisition by

Marked out of

acquisition. Medtronic allocates goodwill to its four


segments and tests if for impairment at that level. To

1.00
Flag
question
Edit question

which segment did Medtronic allocate the most


goodwill from the Covidien acquisition?
Select one:
a. Cardiac and Vascular
b. Minimally Invasive Therapies
c. Restorative Therapies
d. Diabetes

Next

You are logged in as Mark Finn (Log out)

http://lms2.exchange.isb.edu/mod/quiz/attempt.php?attempt=31887&category=589%2C70531&lastchanged=9826#q3

Page 18 of 18

You might also like