Assignment 2
Assignment 2
Title:
New and Renewable Energy Systems
LAB GROUP: -
LECTURERS NAME: -
I confirm that this is all my own work (if submitted electronically, submission will
be taken as confirmation that this is your own work, and will also act as student
signature)
Signed:
MECHM020
New & Renewable Energy Systems
Assignment 2
Hashim Dangra
20th November 2015
Hashim Dangra
Figure 2: Map showing location of farm (Left) and farm field (Right).
Hashim Dangra
Efficiency Calculations
Using the e-commerce website Alibaba.com [5], various MS cell manufacturers were explored and 3
main options were compared to find the most suitable manufacturer to supply the photovoltaic cells,
with performance, availability, and cost being the main criteria of comparison.
Table 1: Efficiency calculations for photovoltaic cell options.
Manufacturer
height
(mm)
Quoted
Power
Output
(W)
Power/Area Calculated
(W/m2)
Efficiency
(%)
18
1956
1650
1580
1650
300
260
190
275
154.61
158.85
148.83
168.01
16.8
992
992
808
992
15.46
15.88
14.88
16.80
From the findings in Table 1, it was decided that the Canadian Solar monocrystalline silicon solar cell,
model Quartech CS6K-270275M, would be chosen for the solar power plant, as this would give the
highest calculated efficiency, and presented the most reliable information in the data sheet [6]. The
cost of this solar cell will be discussed in later sections.
Hashim Dangra
the electricity production over the year by positioning the modules in a North-facing manner. This is
typical of solar plants in the southern hemisphere. The calculations can be seen in Table 2.
Results
Table 2: Results of no of unit calculations.
Array Type
Total
AC
En- No. of units 150
Energy
ergy/(KWh/Year)
(GWh)
(kWh/m2/day)
5.48
5.4
6.63
6.67
7.15
369
363
451
452
484
40650.41
41322.31
33259.42
33185.84
30991.74
406504.1
413223.1
332594.2
331858.4
309917.4
350 (GWh)
948509.5
964187.3
776053.2
774336.3
723140.5
The option of having half of the modules arranged south facing (ideal for summer months) and the
other half arranged north facing (ideal for winter months), can be seen in the fixed array type with
2 tilt angles. This option yields a lower output than having all of the modules arranged with 1 tilt
angle, and this is due to the fact that at any given moment, half of the PV cells are not producing
their maximum potential. This leads to an overall lower production, and therefore would not be the
best option for this investigation.
It can be seen from Table 2 that solar tracking systems offer significantly larger output yields as they
move to provide the best possible output on the day. 1-axis tracking systems have the ability rotate so
that they are able to point directly at the sun for a much longer period of time during the day. 2-axis
systems can rotate in such a way that they are able to do this throughout the whole year, as they have
the ability to change the azimuthal angle. From the calculations, the 2-axis tracking system provides
the highest AC energy per year, and therefore requires the least number of units.
Losses
The assumptions for the losses were used in the derate factor, which allowed the calculation of the
efficiency from DC to AC production, are summarised as follows and were taken into account in the
calculations:
Soiling - 2%: This occurs when solar radiation is prevented from reaching the solar cells due to dirt or
other substances on the surface of the PV module. The impact of this can be reduced by positioning
the module at tilt angles greater than 15 , which allow rain water to provide a cleaning effect on the
surface of the module. Proper maintenance of the modules, such as washing off any dirt that has
collected over time can also be employed to reduce this.
Shading - 0%: This is caused by the shade of nearby structures such as trees, buildings, as well
as self-shading where neighbouring modules shadows are cast onto the module, creating losses in
power production. For the purpose of this study, it was assumed that the distance between the
modules would be large enough so as to negate this effect completely. However, in reality limited space
and budget for projects such as this would mean that this loss would have to be incurred as a compromise.
Hashim Dangra
Snow - 0%: Due to the climate conditions in the region around Fortaleza, the losses due to snow
would be negligible, as no snow fall is reported throughout the year. The PV Modules are designed to
withstand a snow load of up to 5400Pa and wind loads of 2400Pa, which make it structurally sound.
Mismatch - 2%: This is caused by the manufacturing tolerances and imperfections, which cause the
module to have slightly different current-voltage characteristics. The value of 2% was chosen by the
calculator as a suitable default for the majority of PV systems [3].
Wiring - 2%: This is due to the resistive losses in the wires connecting the electronics, such as the
inverters, DC, and AC circuits.
Connections - 0.5%: These are caused by resistive losses in electrical connections within the system.
Light-Induced Degradation - 1.5%: This is due to the effect of reduction in the modules power during
the initial months of operation, causing light-induced degradation of the cells.
Nameplate Rating - 1%: This is the loss of accuracy in the manufacturers nameplate rating, i.e.
empirical measurements of the PV module are different to those rated by the manufacturer. This is
often caused by different operating conditions for different projects, however it can be assumed to be
within 1%, as the companies offer reliable data sheets for their products.
Age - 13.33%: This was calculated based on the fact that the solar plant will need to produce its target
energy outputs over the next 15 years. The effect of weathering over time will mean that the overall
efficiency of the solar cell will gradually reduce over time. From the CanadianSolar data sheet [3], as
part of the warranty, it is stated that the power output after 10 year will not fall under 90%, and after
25 year years will not fall under 80%. Interpolating for 15 years gives a value of 86.66%, and therefore
the losses caused by age are 13.33%. This means, however, that when the modules are first installed
they will be exceeding their target electrical output, as they will not have incurred 13.33% losses due
to ageing. For the age derate factor, based on 0.9 being used for the 11th year of operation, 0.87 was
assumed to be representative of 15 years of operation.
Availability - 3%: This is the reduced system output due to either scheduled or unscheduled system
shut-downs or maintenance works. From the manufacturer data [6], the maintenance required for
these modules are regular cleaning and inspection of electrical component integrity. Therefore, it was
assumed that the losses caused by availability would be very low, with the system possible being
switched off for rare severe weather occurrences.
Derate Factor
The PVWatts Derate Factor Calculator was used to determine the DC to AC Derate Factor, and
the assumptions are shown in Table 3. The inverter selected to be used with the CanadianSolar PV
module was the Zhejiang Xintuo New Energy 300W inverter, which has an efficiency of 96%. The
overall derate factor is the product of all fo the component derate factors, and it was accounted for in
the PCWatts Solar calculator through input fields of percentage losses that have been stated above.
Hashim Dangra
0.95
0.96
0.98
0.995
0.98
0.99
0.98
0.97
1
1
0.85
0.674
H
D1 + D2
Min. Spacing
Min. Area
1.65
20
87
69.5
1.51
4.39
4.89
4.851985
Using this value of 4.39m, which is the calculated minimum spacing, 0.5m were added to allow enough
space for the effects of shading to become negligible. The total area that 1 module would require was
calculated by multiplying with the width, giving, 4.89m2 . Assuming that modules in each row were
arranged side by side, and the final plant would occupy a square piece of land, the total area was
calculated and is shown in Table 5.
Table 5: Total Area Covered by Solar Modules
Array Type
Fixed (Open Rack)
No. of units
Acres
40650.41
41322.31
33259.42
33185.84
30991.74
197235.2
200495.3
161374.2
161017.2
150371.4
48.74
49.54
39.88
39.79
37.16
1 Tilt Angle
2 Tilt Angles
1-Axis Tracking
1-Axis Backtracking
2-Axis Tracking
Hashim Dangra
Cost Analysis
Table 6: Cost Breakdown
Item
Quantity
PV Module
Inverter
Other Electronics
Mounting (fixed) [8]
Mounting (1-axis) [9]
Mounting (2-Axis) [10]
Installation
Land
Maintenance
165
50
20
500
1050
2500
250000
250000
40000
40650
40650
40650
2236
5543
3409
1
1
15
6707317
2032520
813008.1
1117886
5820399
8522727
250000
250000
600000
4359756
1321138
528455.3
726626
3783259
5539773
162500
162500
390000
Fixed
1-Axis
2-Axis
11770732
16473245
19175573
7650976
10707609
12464122
Fixed
1-Axis
2-Axis
0.05
0.07
0.09
0.03
0.05
0.06
Total Cost
Cost/KWh
Over 15 Years
The costs for the PV modules were taken from the manufacturer website, and the Inverter and
Mountings were from Alibaba.com. The prices listed were ranges, and the highest range was assumed
in order to overestimate the costs. This will account for specific costs that have not been included
in Table 6, as it is a high-level cost breakdown. Other electronics, such as wiring, cables, connectors,
and control systems, were assumed to average to 20 dollars per unit. The quantity of mountings were
calculated from the results in Table 2, and the prices were estimated from the suppliers range of prices
for the specific mounting; the links to these mountings can be found in the References Section.
Installation of the solar power plant was assumed to be carried out by a contracting company, such as
Energy Team Brasil [11], who specialise in the installation of household and commercial solar plants
on the grid. As no price was available, a nominal contract price of 250,000 dollars was assumed to
be the cost of installing the fixed solar panels, assuming 100 dollars per module unit mounting, as
well as other electronics assemblies. The land is currently listed on BrazilPrime [12] with a list price
of 250,000 dollars, and a maintenance cost of 40,000 dollars was assumed which includes the cost of
maintenance staff and equipment, multiplied by 15 years of operation.
From the Table 6, it can be seen that the cheapest cost of manufacturing electricity (kWh) was given
by installing fixed PV modules with the same tilt and azimuthal angles.
Hashim Dangra
Environmental Impact
Land Use
The use of large scale PV solar power plants leads to concerns over land degradation and habitat
loss. The solar panels occupy a large area of land and cannot share this land with other uses, such as
agriculture which can be shared by wind turbines, and therefore to reduce this impact, the sites on which
solar power plants are developed should be lower-quality. Examples of these can include brownfields,
transportation and transmission corridors, and abandoned mining land. These are sometimes logistically
unviable locations however, and a compromise must be made between cost of developing the site on
low-quality land and occupation of good-quality land.
Pressure Groups
Some pressure groups that may be interested in the development of solar power are global organisations
such as the Union of Concerned Scientists and Greenmatch. These groups may feel that, although solar
power is doing well to produce power from renewable sources, its production damages the environment
to releasing greenhouse gases from fossil fuel power plants. Having said this, the local community
may be more affected by the development of a solar power plant in their area. They will need to be
addressed to show the advantages of installing solar power in their constituency, and be provided with
assurances of the safety of having a solar power plant near their land. Another consideration may be
that locals dislike the aesthetics of solar panels on their natural land.
Hashim Dangra
Hashim Dangra
Executive Summary
A Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant is to be built in the city of Itapipoca, state of Ceara, in the NorthEastern region of Brazil. This location has been chosen for its solar potential, with favourable sunlight
conditions throughout the year, as well as the availability of required area of land near the city. The
plant will be built on a 140 acre farm, with a flat terrain and potential to install solar modules and
necessary structures.
Monocrystalline silicon solar cells will be used as they offer the highest efficiency and are the most
space-efficient module types, and will be provided by CanadianSolar. The output of the modules are
275W, with an efficiency of 16.8%. The inverter will by supplied by Zhejiang Xintuo New Energy and
purchased using Alibaba.com. Calculations were carried out for this setup, with derate factor losses
taken into account, to find the number of units required to meet the energy requirement of 5GWh per
year, over 15 years. The amount of land required to install the calculated number of units required
was also found and Table 7 summarises the data and calculations.
Table 7: Calculations of Options Summary
Array Type
AC Energy
No. of units
Total Area
Total Cost
Cost/KWh
(KWh/Year)
369
363
451
452
484
40650.41
41322.31
33259.42
33185.84
30991.74
Required (Acres)
48.74
49.54
39.88
39.79
37.16
(GBP)
7650976
15YEars
0.03
10707609
0.05
12464122
0.06
From the calculations, it was decided that fixed module mountings would be used, with all modules
having the same Tilt angle of 20 , as this offered superior energy output in the winter months, when
average monthly sunhours were higher than summer months.
The environmental impact of this project will mainly be the use of land, as this land cannot be shared
with agricultural activity. It will also degrade over time, due to soil compaction and water drainage
channels may be changed. However, the overall environmental impact will be relatively low, and can
be further minimised by ensuring that the solar panels are recycled when they reach the end of their
operational life.
The approvals that will be required consist of various licenses that are issued by the town hall,
government, and environmental agencies. These will require the project to meet the town legislation,
as well as Environmental Standards that will be assessed by independent environmental agencies. The
time-scale for these approvals is approximated to take 18 months, with the construction and installation
of the solar power plant requiring a further 2 years.
Hashim Dangra
References
[1] Martins, Pereira, Abreu and Colle, 2010. BRAZILIAN ATLAS FOR SOLAR ENERGY RESOURCE:
SWERA RESULTS [online]
Available at: <http://www.lepten.ufsc.br/publicacoes/solar/eventos/2007/ISES/martins enio.pdf> [Accessed: 1st November 2015]
[2] SolarGIS, 2015. Global Horizontal Irradiation (GHI) [online]
Available at: <http://solargis.info/doc/free-solar-radiation-maps-GHI#B> [Accessed: 1st November
2015]
[3] National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2015. Solar Calculator [online]
Available at: <http://pvwatts.nrel.gov/pvwatts.php> [Accessed: 1st November 2015]
[4] Energy Informative, 2015. Which Solar Panel Type is Best? Mono- vs. Polycrystalline vs. Thin Film [online]
Available at: <http://energyinformative.org/best-solar-panel-monocrystalline-polycrystalline-thin-film/>
[Accessed: 3rd November 2015]
[5] Ali-baba, 2015. Alibaba [online]
Available at: <http://www.alibaba.com/> [Accessed: 3rd November 2015]
[14] NuWire Investor, 2011. How to Understand Planning Permissions and Zoning in Brazil [online]
Available at: <http://www.nuwireinvestor.com/howtos/how-to-understand-planning-permissions-and-zoning-in-brazil
[Accessed: 19th November 2015]
10