Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 145 views

    Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Jesse James Olac Pigon
    This rubric evaluates journal writing across 5 criteria on a scale of 1 to 4: 1) Retelling of experience - detailed and objective vs. biased retelling 2) Reflections/personal response - provides examples and reflects on own work vs. minimal reflection 3) Relevance to classroom concepts - relates observations to class concepts vs. minimal references 4) Analysis of experience - comprehends deeper meanings and shows critical thinking vs. surface level understanding 5) Effort on assignment - obvious detailed effort vs. minimal effort with readable handwriting

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Jesse James Olac Pigon
    145 views2 pages
    This rubric evaluates journal writing across 5 criteria on a scale of 1 to 4: 1) Retelling of experience - detailed and objective vs. biased retelling 2) Reflections/personal response - provides examples and reflects on own work vs. minimal reflection 3) Relevance to classroom concepts - relates observations to class concepts vs. minimal references 4) Analysis of experience - comprehends deeper meanings and shows critical thinking vs. surface level understanding 5) Effort on assignment - obvious detailed effort vs. minimal effort with readable handwriting

    Original Description:

    Rubrics

    Original Title

    RUBRICS

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This rubric evaluates journal writing across 5 criteria on a scale of 1 to 4: 1) Retelling of experience - detailed and objective vs. biased retelling 2) Reflections/personal response - provides examples and reflects on own work vs. minimal reflection 3) Relevance to classroom concepts - relates observations to class concepts vs. minimal references 4) Analysis of experience - comprehends deeper meanings and shows critical thinking vs. surface level understanding 5) Effort on assignment - obvious detailed effort vs. minimal effort with readable handwriting

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    145 views2 pages

    Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Jesse James Olac Pigon
    This rubric evaluates journal writing across 5 criteria on a scale of 1 to 4: 1) Retelling of experience - detailed and objective vs. biased retelling 2) Reflections/personal response - provides examples and reflects on own work vs. minimal reflection 3) Relevance to classroom concepts - relates observations to class concepts vs. minimal references 4) Analysis of experience - comprehends deeper meanings and shows critical thinking vs. surface level understanding 5) Effort on assignment - obvious detailed effort vs. minimal effort with readable handwriting

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    HOLISTIC CRITICAL THINKING SCORING RUBRIC

    4
    Consistently does all or almost all of the following: Accurately interprets evidence,
    statements, graphics, questions, etc. Identifies the salient arguments (reasons and
    claims) pro and con. Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major alternative points of
    view. Draws warranted, judicious, non-fallacious conclusions. Justifies key results
    and procedures, explains assumptions and reasons. Fair-mindedly follows where
    evidence and reasons lead.

    3
    Does most or many of the following: Accurately interprets evidence, statements,
    graphics, questions, etc.Identifies relevant arguments (reasons and claims) pro and
    con.Offers analyses and evaluations of obvious alternative points of view. Draws
    warranted, non-fallacious conclusions. Justifies some results or procedures, explains
    reasons. Fair-mindedly follows where evidence and reasons lead.

    2
    Does most or many of the following: Misinterprets evidence, statements, graphics,
    questions, etc.Fails to identify strong, relevant counter-arguments. Ignores or
    superficially evaluates obvious alternative points of view. Draws unwarranted or
    fallacious conclusions. Justifies few results or procedures, seldom explains reasons.
    Regardless of the evidence or reasons, maintains or defends views based on self-
    interest or preconceptions.

    1
    Consistently does all or almost all of the following: Offers biased interpretations of
    evidence, statements, graphics, questions, information, or the points of view of
    others. Fails to identify or hastily dismisses strong, relevant counter-arguments.
    Ignores or superficially evaluates obvious alternative points of view. Argues using
    fallacious or irrelevant reasons, and unwarranted claims. Does not justify results or
    procedures, nor explain reasons. Regardless of the evidence or reasons, maintains
    or defends views based on self-interest or preconceptions. Exhibits close-
    mindedness or hostility to reason.
    ANALYTIC RUBRIC FOR JOURNAL WRITING

    Task Description: (Teacher may explain specific assignment in this space.)

    ht weig Exemplary Accomplished Developing


    Criteria
    Yes Yes, but No, but
    Detailed explanation Clear explanation of Somewhat clear
    of experience experience explanation of
    Specific descriptors of Objective experience
    Retelling of observations during observation of Somewhat objective
    20%
    Experience experience experience observation of
    Writing is highly Organization is experience
    organized with clear and easy to Minimal organization
    logical sequence follow
    Reflections/ Reflects well on own Reflects on own Some reflection on
    Personal 20% work work own work
    Response Provides many Provides examples Provides few
    examples examples
    Relevance to Student listens well in Student listens in Makes minimal
    Classroom different contexts; class; relates some reference to what is
    Concepts or 20% relates observations observations to heard in class or to
    Personal to classroom classroom concepts personal experience
    Experience concepts and/or and/or personal
    personal experiences experiences
    Makes many Makes inferences Some inferences are
    inferences most of the time made
    Analysis of Comprehends deeper Usually Comprehends surface
    20% meanings comprehends level meaning
    Experience
    High level of critical deeper meanings Minimal critical
    thinking expressed Some critical thinking expressed
    thinking expressed
    Obvious, detailed Acceptable effort on Some effort on
    Effort on effort on assignment all parts of the assignment
    20%
    Assignment Neat, legible assignment Readable handwriting
    handwriting Legible handwriting
    Assignment Score ______________ + Bonus ______________ = Final Score
    ________________

    You might also like