MOST An Advance Prof S S Patil PDF
MOST An Advance Prof S S Patil PDF
MOST An Advance Prof S S Patil PDF
ABSTRACT
The paper is with the intention to provide awareness of particular work measurement technique called
'Maynard Operation Sequence Technique' essential for planning and controlling operation. The objective ot
any work measurement technique is to reduce the work content and thereby improve the productivity of the
process. The disadvantages of the other work measurement methods over Mo.S. T is that in each
technique like MTM, PMTS the recording of the data is classified into a number of intangit:...Jranges, .,.!'Ihich
are not user-friendly. Mo.S. T has the data manipulation during operation. They has almost eliminated the
online worker unconfortability.
1) INTRODUCTION
H.B.Maynard and Company had nuruduccd M.O.ST system after they found the applicauou (If PMTS./l.ITM detailed
in data collection .This new system was brought into practice in the u.s. 1975. There are malty reasons for wanting to
know the amount of time a particular task should take to accomplish .It may simply be for rcaSO:1S of curiosity. But,
r,iislically , it is for any of three reasons: to accomplish planning. determine performance. and establish C(IStS.
;"IOST is il sysrcn, 10 IIle,I'W,: \.(lrh:. therefore it conccrur.ncs on [he .noveme.u of \lb;L'c', , Ltficicnt. smooth. productive
wor']; is performed \\ hc;! Ih.: I,,i( motion pallCrtlS arc tact ically arranged and '!l;"";hly choreographed (method
cn~i nccri ng ). It \\ .1\ 11<'\1,c',: II!;U tl: movcrncu I, or the object <, fo 110vv ccrt.ii n COIl\I-tcn i Iv repeat ing pnucru: such itS
reach. gr,asp', II!(I\C. IHhlll<'". illc (lbjccl. etc. To ilH"'C an object ,l universe s:XjUCIlCL'111<',:-':1 in-rend of random dctui lcd
b.is, motions dC~CI d\~ ... ru. ''. ..:I.!t .:II!.
~ ~.C;lt"('1 /)('/'dll',,\'/l.'I'; /'".1::':1:,.[11111 Cl1giJ/c{'ri/l.~'. ht;orori \,iti\"(JjJ('c//;'s C'II//c.!..,'('o(F; :..: '.-..(":ill::":. I'rut c
-.l.ccturcr. 1)('/1(11[11:. ,-: ", i', '/illl!{l1! l;:ngillc('ri;!,-: '\'!l1hgod C',I/cg('o,' F.i':...:nl'CI"JII.t.:. P:.
. ,-\SSf. /'rolc'.\"\(I. 1),,:,.,, .. ;: '0'; f'lI/dllctioll rJI~:llr(nllr..:. SJJJlIt:Or/ Colt c-; 01 EI1~lIICl'l; ..
.' l 'ur),
I Senior rl'CfIIlCI. I) :'" .. " (I,: \1", il{l!licfI/ l:'I1!.:/J.'('(T'lig. N{l/{Iroll!iJt:/"1 ":di!llfC i:! 'L (. ;'/0'.:,\. Sul/ul!tiic
--I. !:::
--:.-~.
"';:i':- ._,
"
Nation::! Conference on Recent Trends in CAD/CAMiCAE (NCRTC-2004). 21-23 June 2C04. R.1.T.. Rajararnnagar
!n general. objects call be moved in only two ways, either they are picked and moved freely through space. or they are
moved while maintaining contact with another surface. For example, a box can be picked up and carried from one end
of a workbench to another or it can be pushed across the top of the workbench. For each type of move, a different
sequence of CVCIII~ occurs, therefore. a separate MOST activity model applies. The use of tools analyzed through a
i separate activity sequence model.
Consequently. (llih three basic MOST activity sequences are -ieeded for describing manual work. plus a fourth for
measuring the movements of objects with manual cranes:
i
I
The General Move Sequence (for the movements of an objects fr.:e1y through air)
The controlled MI)\C Sequence (for the movements of an objects when it remain in contact with a surface or is attached
to another object dl1rtng thc movement)
The Tool Use )C4L1eIlLC(fur the use of common hand tools) . Refer Table 1.
These subacuviuc-, .1.--:arranged in a sequence model (Fig. I ). consisting of a series of parameters organized in a logical
sequence. The ~e4l!e'~,c model defines the events or actions that always take place in a prescribed order when an object
is being moved r"r,,::: OIIC location to another. The General Move Sequence Model, which is the most commonly used
sequence u.odc}. ,...1..1..:;"; ncd ..J~ follows:
These subacu v iuc , .'1 ~e411C:1Cemodel parameters, are then assigned time related index numbers based on the motion
content of tile ':ul'.lc'i\-::\,. This approach provides complete analysis flex ibility within the overall control of the
sequence mods: i,r "id'~object moved. any combination of motions might occur, and using MOST. any cornbinarior,
m y he analyzed : ,- II:.: General Move Sequence. these index values arc easily memorized from a brief datu card .. -\
!'uily indexed G-:::- i .. \ I .vc Sequence, for example. might appear as fo!lows:
Gel , Put
i
I
.-\6 36 ("', , "~ ! BO P3
II
II
P3 = Place .IP,i .., ,::,1 "t'ject
AO = No re'IU:i,
6 + 6 + I + ! . .\ 10 = 170 TMU
II
:I
This c x amplc CUll:
arise. and place 11;,'
'
'.
.u st ancc, represent
'i :'1,1 hole.
the following activity: walk three: steps to pick up a bolt from floor level.
I
I
I
1
4. 13
l
Na;ional Conference en Recent Trends in CAD/CAM/CAE (NCRTC-2004)_ 21-23 June 2004. RJ.T . Rajaramnagar
I As many as one -third of the activities occurring in machine shop operations may involve controlled moves. In
assembly work. however. the fraction is usually much smallest. A Typical activity covered by the controlled move
f
I sequence is the engaging of the feed lever on the milling machine. The sequence model for this activity might be
I indexed s follows: r.
I
I Get Mot ,0;: Actuate
AI-BIJ GI II XIO 10
Retur~~
/
,r
i.
I
I
00
GI
MI
XIO
[0
No body motion
Get hold of the lever
Move lever up to 12 inches to engage feed
Process time of Approximately
=: No alignment
3.5 sec.
AO No return.
Example- From a position in front of the lathe, the operator takes two steps to the side, turns the handwheel two
revolution. and sets the cutting tool by aligning the handwheel dial to a scale mark
A3 80 G I M6 XO 16 AO
( 3 + I + 6 + 6 ) X 10 =: 16C TMU
The use of a wrench. for example. might be described by the following sequence:
Get
object
t001
aside
Put 1001 or
operator
Ur tool
Put 1001 ir Return or o~ect object In place
A I 130 GI AI BO P3 FIG AI 80 PI
AO I
Where: r\ I Reach to wrench
= No body motion
80
G I = Get hold of wrench
B(~ = Nc body motion
P' = Place wrench on fastener
F 10 = Tiglucn fastener with wrench
A I = Move wrench a distance with in reach
f3(l No body motion
PI = Lay wrench aside
.-\0 = No return
( I + I ;- I +.'
+ 10 + I + I ) X 10 = 180 TMU
-L 14
National Conference on Recent Trends in CAD/CAM/CAE (NCRTC-2004)_ 21-23 June 2004_ R.I.T .. Rajaramnagar
repetitiveness off the operations. cycie time of the operation being performed. type 'of operation etc. There
types of MOST systems which are-
Mini MOST ( used for repetitive operations)
Basic MOST ( used for general operations)
Maxi MOST ( used for Non-repetitive. operations)
i,
Clerical MOST ( used for clerical operation)
I Mini MOST
At the lowest level . Mini MOST provides the most de uled and precise
I methods analyze.In general , this level of detail an pr cision is required to analyze any operation likely to be re
I
I
mere than 1500 rimes per work .An operation in this c tegory may range from 2 to 10 seconds .There are only Set
models i.c the General and the Controlled Move. In contrast to Basic MOST. the index value total for a Set
j model IS 11Iulli;,licd by I and converted to minutes or seconds
Area of arrlic.t!ioll';: Light press operations. Manufacturing of PCB.etc
I
Basic \'IOST
At the I nrcrmcdiatc level, operations that are likely to be performed more than 150 but fewer than 1500 times per
should be analyvcd with Basic MOSi. An operation in this category may range from a few seconds to 10 rninu
length. (Opcrauons longer than 10 minutes may be analyzed with Basic MOST, with 0.5-3 minutes being typical
time for Busic !'-IOSD. The majority of operations in most industries fall into this category. Basic MOST index r:
:I readily accommodate the cycle-to-cycle variations typical at this level. The method descriptions that result from I
~.I MOST :tn."~ .'';' .irc sufficiently detailed for use as operator instructions.
~\ Areas ot application: General manual Work.
!\:iAXI _\lOST
At the hl:;he't level. Maxi MOST is used to analyze operations that are likely to be performe-d fewer than 150 time!
week. .-\n oper.':ltlll in this category may be less than 2 minutes to more than several hours in length. Maxi Mt
index r ..Jn~t::, .:L":;,;:\Ir.t:d::.te the wide cycle-to-cycle variations that are typical in such work as setups or heavy assern
Even ..!,
,hI.' J..-. ,.1. the method descriptions resulting from Maxi MOST are very practical for instructional purpc
Maxi :-'1(),,j u<, 'he same index values as Basic and Mini MOST. However the multiplier here is 100 instead of [
.n [h~k \l(.l\ I "ilLi then converted as required,
Areas ,_,j' ;Ii~pl;\ .uion. Maintenance work, S[l:P building, rail C3.i fabrications etc.
The till:_' .' '" TMU for each sequence mode! in calculated by adding the index numbers and multiplying the SUIll
I u. !l I- ., _,"l\c.:fted to hours, mins or sees. Total time for adding the computed sequence times arrives at I
complete . , . I x. r analysis. All time values established b~ \LO.5.T reflect the activity of an average skilled opcra
\\"orkin:; :r..:;c performance level or normal pace. This time represents pure work content at 1009', perforrnur
level.
The vur: , .,:I..I;:tivities in the various sequences are based on detailed MT.M. backup analyses describing I
different .. !"' ,:, "h. The MT.M analyses are slotted into fixed time ranges represented by an index vall
c(Jrre.:s[l":: ... ~ i 'Illcdian. Time range~ arc calculated using statistical accuracy principle theory. The para me
van.uu-, .:: .: .',.1 till data cards for quick reference. Parameter indexing is the appl ication of time related index vall
to e;I.:I: .... .. .: n.odcl parameter base Oil the motion content. It is defined as the process of sclccung the appropr i.
par.uucr,': ::i Irom the reference table or date card and appiving the corresponding mdex value .
-L l:'i
National Conference on ~ecent Trends in CAD/CAM/CAE (NCRTC-2004). 21-23 June 2004. R.I.T . Rajaramnagar
Each chart covers one of the two levels of accuracy most often required by government and industry. With either chart.
if you know or can estimate the approximate length of the operation in minutes and the percentage of the standard
calculation period occupied. by repetitions of the operation. you can quickly determine which MOST version will be
suff:ciently accurate for the analysis. This provides a useful guideline for avoiding the extra work that would he
required to analyze operations with a version of MOST more detailed than necessary. ---
,
I
For example. using Fig. 2 if the operation is about one minute long and will be repeated enough times to occupy about
I 30 % of the pay period. a Basic MOST analysis will be sufficiently accurate. If repetitions of this same operation
I occupy 70 % of the period, however, then Mini MOST must be used for the analysis. A similar determination is made
I for each analysis. When all analyses of the operations that fill the calculation period fall within the charted limits.
overall accuracy within .::!:..-5% is assured. To maintain overall accuracy, when estimating the cycle time for the
operation, do not include the time for any step or sequence of steps that is repeatedvdentically jvithin the operation
j cycle. .
6)CONCLUSION
I
With the help of MOST method. its possible to achieve major times reduction in the manufacturing of the products .
. MOST nearly gives non-machining time reduction of 60 to 65 0/0. Which is measure achievement for MOST
application. MOST gives alternative to the Time Study method.
i With the help of this method its possible to get the production time of the products before its actual manufacturing
r> starts. This helps in the production planning of FOK (First of Its Kind) products.
.":" With the Most it's possible now to plan the production for one day before in the beginning of day itself Since its
provided with software support called as MDAT (MOST DATA) which eliminate the manual calculation and give ease
in the time measurement.
REFERANCE
I. Antis. William, Honeycutt, John M., J r. , and Koch, Edward N .. The Basic Moticns of MTM, The Maynard
Foundation. 1986
L.. Hodscn, William K., Editor-in-Chief, Maynard's Industrial Engineering Handbook, 4th Edition. MoGraw-Hill.
1992
3. Wcsterkarnp. Thomas A., Maintenance Manager's Standard Manual, 2nd Edition, Prentice-Halt, 1997
4. Zandin, Kjefl E., M05T Wo.k Measurement Systems, 2nd Edition. Marcel Dekker. 1990
5. SCl'111. P "MOST Work Measurement Systems" 200)
6. Vcnkat~sh.S" Thesis on MOST Study at Gear carrier assembly" ~OO2
4. 16
-:
"'
ft
",,:iollaJ Conference on Recent Trends in CAD/CAM/CAE (NCRTC-2004). 21-23 June 2004. R.I.T . Rajaramnagar
' . -. ;
/
.-... .
"-
$
*J!;
.- :~
~,
i 5
.S
[ <U 4.5
I .g "-I-
I t::
0
3.5
I
<;l
'-
<U
0- 1
-)
0
I '0
~ 25
C<l
E I
L!J -
')
1.5
~MiniMOST
---
05
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
I
I
I
Fig I. MOST <ystern selection guidelines for -5% accuracy
/
/1
at a 95 % confidence level
i
! UseMaxiMOS;!
il.l I S
E
l.I:
t::
o
1. Use Basic OST
I
I
!l '..
-,'." i
V
Ii
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Estimated Percentage of calculation Period
Fig '2 .\ 1( ",' ",(;;11 selection guidelines for J 09C accuracy at a 90 % confidence level
4. J
1
/
National Conference on Recent l rcnu> ~ ._. _ ...
.
Basic MOST work measurement Technique
I
ACITVITY SEQUENCE SUB-ACTIVITIES I
I
MODEL
I
I Action Distance, B- Body Motion
I General Move ABGABPA G- Gain Control , P- Placement
M- Move controlled, X - Process Time
I Controlled
Move
ABGMXIA
Alignment -
I Tool Use ABGASP
A
ASP F-Fasten,
Surface Treat
L- Loosen, C- Cut, S-
I M- Measure, R- Record, T- Thick
--
,
I Table 1 Sequence Models comprising the Basic MOST technique.