Check List CRS

Proposed closing of L-Xing. Gate No. 38/B at Km.
151/0-1 by providing limited height subway as per

CEs Drg. No. Y-235-2014(ALT-1).
Check of signalling work applications.

(To be filled as per application)
Sl. Name of work By Rly. Remarks CRSs

No. case remarks
work/OS
remarks
1). Whether all copies of application are singed by NA
authority signalling the Engineering Officers (as the
case may be)
2). Whether the signalling plan is counter signed by NA
CSTE/Con for construction works and COM for COM.
Whether the reference of signaling and P.Way (yard)
plan is indicated in the application.
3). Whether others drawings and diagrams are signed by NA
Dy. CSTE/Con. (with name and designation) for
CSTE/Con. for construction works.
4). Whether others drawings and diagrams are NA
countersigned by CSE for open line works.
5). There should not be any hand written corrections in No hand
drawings and diagrams. written
correction
in the Drg.
6). There should not be any hand written corrections in N.A.
SWR.
7). The name of work should correspond with each other NA
between the application and deviation from GES
proposed.
8). Whether application and deviations from GRS NA
proposed are checked and recommended by Dy.
CRS/S & T/MB.
9). Whether his observations are complied with. NA
10). Whether all pages are SWR are signed by authorized NA

officers.
11). Whether list of deviations from GRS is signed by Dy. NA
CSTE/Con. and COM in all copies.
12). All drawings and diagrams should be signed on Yes
originals and prints sent.
13). Whether P.Way details like rail, sleeper, ballast, NA
details of turn out are mentioned in the yard plan in
case of the work of yard arrangements with signalling
arrangements. Whether rail fencing is shown between
running line and new loop line etc. with details of
cross section without causing any infringements.
Whether track spacing is shown.
14). Whether delaied drawing of new bridge, if any the NA
propose yard submitted in including CRS sanction
(Ref, Yelahanko case). Whether the bridges as per
drawing no. RDSO/B-1609 R I discontinued in view of
RDSOS withdrawal of the same.
DEN/IV/HWH Sr. DEN/Co-Ordn./HWH

15). In case of interlocking/provision of lifting barriers for NA
level crossings, whether the level crossings continues
to Annexure 9/1 para 904 of IRPWM in all respects and
which lever locking arrangements of lifting barriers is
provided. The provisions of safety circular no.8 (for
non-interlocked gates) and clause for no of gateman
should be included in the gate working rules. Whether
height gauges are shown in electrified section.
16). In case of proposed level crossing in the proposed yard NA
it should be built as per annexure 9/1 para 904 of
IRPWM in all respects with winch lever locking
arrangements of lifting barriers and the interlocking of
the gates is done. CRS sanction reference should be
called for.
17). Whether sand humps are provided in the new yards NA
with standard III interlocking in the absence of over
run line.
18). In two/multiply line stations without sand hump/sand NA
dead end on single line without a steep approach
falling gradient, a note should be given to the effect
that sand humps/sand dead ends should be provided
in near future.
19). (a) in terms of note (under item 2 chapter 2 of NA
BGSOD-04). At stations with grades sleeper than I in
40 beyond 50 metrs of outermost points, trains should
not be drawn upto the last stop signal and held up on
the steep gradient in outer to clear the reception line
for giving permission to approach to the following
train. No shunting beyond outer most point on the
steep gradient sight should be allowed unless a
locomotive is attached at the lower end of the load
from the point of view of gradient. SWR should
embody the CRS/S & T/MB before recommending.
b) The compliance of other notes under item (2)

chapter (2) of DGSOD-2004 should be ensured in the NA
yard plan particularly the item about no change of
grade takes place within 30 Mtrs. of turn out. A note
about this should this should be given in the sanction.
20). For yard arrangement or any other work requiring NA

speed restriction as per rules, the necessary speed
restriction should be shown in the application form.
S.R.diagram should be shown in the yard plan with the
location of Engineering indicator, CE-191 should be
sent. A note about gradual release of sped restriction
as per para 238 (g) of IRPWM should be given. For
works in station area a note about checking of the
caution order and following of the same by the drivers
by officers to be given.
DEN/IV/HWH Sr. DEN/Co-Ordn./HWH

Check List CRS

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Check List CRS

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Check List CRS

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Proposed closing of L-Xing. Gate No. 38/B at Km.

151/0-1 by providing limited height subway as per

Check of signalling work applications.

Sl. Name of work By Rly. Remarks CRSs

10). Whether all pages are SWR are signed by authorized NA

DEN/IV/HWH Sr. DEN/Co-Ordn./HWH

b) The compliance of other notes under item (2)

20). For yard arrangement or any other work requiring NA

DEN/IV/HWH Sr. DEN/Co-Ordn./HWH

You might also like