PMTCT
PMTCT
PMTCT
In high income countries MTCT has been virtually eliminated thanks to effective
voluntary testing and counseling, access to antiretroviral therapy, safe delivery
practices, and the widespread availability and safe use of breast-milk substitutes. If
these interventions were used worldwide, they could save the lives of thousands of
children each year.
The last of these can be achieved by the use of antiretroviral drugs, safer infant
feeding practices and other interventions.
Antiretroviral drugs
Pregnant women who do not yet need treatment for their own HIV infection can
take a short course of drugs to help protect their unborn babies. The main options
are outlined below, in order of complexity and effectiveness.
Among babies infected with HIV and exposed to single-dose nevirapine, around half
have drug resistance at 6-8 weeks old.12 other infants may become infected with
drug resistant HIV through breastfeeding.13
Because of concerns about drug resistance and relatively low effectiveness, there is
now general agreement that single dose nevirapine should be used only when no
alternative PMTCT drug regimen is available. Whenever possible, women should
receive a combination of drugs to prevent HIV resistance problems and to decrease
MTCT rates even further.
Nevirapine, however, is still the only single dose drug available to prevent MTCT.
Other "short course" treatments require women to take drugs during and after
pregnancy as well as during labour and delivery. This means they are much more
expensive and more difficult to implement in resource poor settings than nevirapine,
which can be used with little or no medical supervision at all. So, for now, single
dose nevirapine remains the only practical choice for PMTCT of HIV in areas with
minimal medical resources.
Under the 2009 guidelines, all HIV positive mothers, identified during pregnancy,
should receive an extensive course of antiretroviral drugs to prevent mother to child
transmission. For more information about the 2009 recommendations, please see
AVERT's 2009 WHO Guidelines page. If these extensive drugs are not available,
then the 2006 recommended course might be an option and a woman should begin
taking AZT after 28 weeks of pregnancy (or as soon as possible thereafter). During
labour she should take AZT and 3TC, as well as a single dose of nevirapine. Her
baby should receive a single dose of nevirapine immediately after birth, followed by
a seven-day course of AZT. The mother should continue taking AZT and 3TC for
seven days after delivery, to cut the risk of drug resistance still further.
The WHO says that PMTCT programmes are "strongly encouraged" to implement
the 2009 recommendations but acknowledges that this might not be possible for all
countries. In this situation, there are previous regimens that have been used and
might be implemented, these options are shown in the table below.
Under the 2006 recommendations, if a woman receives at least four weeks of AZT
during pregnancy, doctors may choose to omit her dose of nevirapine from the
recommended regimen. In this case she will not have to take 3TC during labour, or
to take any drugs after birth. However, her baby must still receive nevirapine, and
should also receive AZT for four weeks instead of one.
If the woman receives less than four weeks of AZT during pregnancy then her baby
should receive AZT for four weeks instead of one.
Triple combinations
The most effective PMTCT therapy involves a combination of three antiretroviral
drugs taken during the later stages of pregnancy and during labour. This therapy is
essentially identical to the treatment taken by HIV-positive people for their own
health, except that it is taken only for a few months, and the choice of drugs may be
slightly different. Triple therapy is usually recommended to women in developed
countries, and is becoming more widespread in the rest of the world and the WHO
2009 Guidelines, reflects this. AVERT.org has more information about HIV and
pregnancy, including a discussion of these more sophisticated regimens.
By the time this news story appeared, a committee from the US Institute of
Medicine was already engaged in a major independent review of the design,
conduct, results and validity of the HIVNET 012 study. After evaluating extensive
material from a variety of sources and reviewing primary source documents from
Uganda, the investigation reported its findings in April 2005.
The committee found that the original report on the HIVNET 012 study was
"sound, presented in a balanced manner, and can be relied upon for scientific and
policy-making purposes." The allegations about unreported deaths were found to be
completely untrue. Of the 306 mothers who received nevirapine, 16 experienced
serious adverse events, and only one was thought possibly to be due to nevirapine.14
The safety and effectiveness of single dose nevirapine has been confirmed by many
other clinical trails. Although long-term use of nevirapine has been linked to liver
damage, there is no evidence of any significant safety risk from a single dose to
prevent MTCT. The December 2004 press story (which seems to have arisen from a
personal feud between US officials) has been thoroughly discredited.14, 15, 16, 17
Numerous subsequent studies, including a large clinical trial in Thailand, have
reaffirmed that nevirapine is safe and effective at preventing MTCT.15
HIV and safer infant feeding
Mothers with HIV are advised not to breastfeed whenever the use of breast milk
substitutes (formula) is acceptable, feasible, affordable, sustainable and safe.
However if they live in a country where safe water is not available then the risk of
life-threatening conditions from formula feeding may be higher than the risk from
breastfeeding. An HIV positive mother should be counseled on the risks and benefits
of different infant feeding options and should be helped to select the most suitable
option for her situation.18
A baby fed on infant formula does not receive the special vitamins, nutrients and
protective agents found in breast milk. And the cost of infant formula often puts it
beyond the reach of poor families in resource poor countries, even if the product is
widely available. Many women also lack access to the knowledge, potable water and
fuel needed to prepare replacement feeds safely, or simply have no time to prepare
them. If used incorrectly - mixed with unsafe water, for example, or over-diluted - a
breast milk substitute can cause infections, malnutrition and even death.
Furthermore, if a mother chooses not to breastfeed in settings where breastfeeding
is the norm then this may draw attention to her HIV status and invite
discrimination, violence or abandonment by her family and community. Another
factor worth noting is the contraceptive effect of breastfeeding, which can help to
lengthen the interval between pregnancies.
Caesarean sections
A caesarean section is an operation to deliver a baby through its mother’s
abdominal wall. When a mother is HIV positive a caesarean section may be done to
protect the baby from direct contact with her blood and other bodily fluids.
However, as with formula feeding, there is a need to weigh the risk of HIV
transmission against the risk of harm due to the intervention.
The original Initiative had the aim of reaching one million women with HIV testing
and counseling and providing preventive drugs to 80 per cent of HIV positive
delivering women by 2007. It aimed to reduce mother-to-child transmission by 40
percent in its fourteen focus countries, twelve of which are in Africa.
From fiscal year 2004 to FY 2007, PEPFAR has supported prevention of MTCT for
women during more than 10 million pregnancies with antiretroviral drugs being
provided in over 827,000 pregnancies. This has resulted in the prevention of an
estimated 157,000 infant HIV infections. 22
AVERT.org has more information about the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS
Relief in our PEPFAR page.
During the Task Team's pilot phase in Botswana and Rwanda, from April 1999 to
July 2001, counseling was provided to 220,000 pregnant women. Of these women,
138,000 were tested for HIV, and about 4,500 HIV positive women received
antiretroviral therapy to prevent MTCT. As of mid-2005, support was being
provided to 226 programme sites in sixteen countries, of which ten are in Africa.24
MTCT-Plus
The MTCT-Plus Initiative was established in 2002, and is coordinated by the
Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University. The Initiative aims to
move beyond interventions aimed only at preventing infant HIV infection. It does
this by supporting the provision of specialized care to HIV-infected women, their
partners and their children who are identified in MTCT programmes. Funding for
the initiative is provided by a group of private foundations, including the Gates
Foundation, the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation, as well
as by PEPFAR via USAID.
In 2008 the Global Fund announced that 271,000 HIV positive pregnant women had
been reached with prophylaxis for PMTCT through Global Fund money in 2007.26
HIV testing is critical because women who do not know they are HIV positive
cannot benefit from interventions. However some women refuse to be tested because
they fear learning that they have a life-threatening condition; because they distrust
HIV tests; or because they do not expect their results to remain confidential, and
fear stigma and discrimination following a positive result.
Some women who test HIV positive do not return to clinics for follow up visits, or
fail to take the drugs they have been given. This can happen because they have had
negative experiences interacting with clinic staff, or because they have been poorly
informed about HIV transmission and how it can be prevented. Some women
having tested negative early in pregnancy can become infected during pregnancy;
without returning to clinics for retesting treatment is not accessed27. Also, some
women choose not to attend clinics because by doing so they might disclose their
HIV positive status. In the words of a woman from Cote d'Ivoire:
"My husband might see me with the medicines, and he will want to know what they
are for. That way he will find out about my [HIV positive test] result. Even the
location bothers me, because everyone who comes to the clinic knows what goes on
[at the programme]. As soon as a pregnant woman is seen coming here, it's known
right away that she is seropositive."28