1 Ml11229a721

Shielding Radiation
Alphas,
p Betas, Gammas and Neutrons
7/05/2011 1
Contents
General
General
Shielding Alpha Emitters

Shielding
Shi ldi B Beta
t PParticles
ti l
General
Beta Particle Range
Bremsstrahlung
Example Calculation
Shielding Positrons
Shielding Positrons 2
Contents
Shielding Gamma Rays
General
Basic Equation First Example Calculation
Basic Equation Second Example Calculation
Relaxation Length
Calculating the Required Shielding Thickness
Calculating the Required Shielding Thickness Example
Shielding Multiple Gamma Ray Energies
Shielding Multiple Gamma Ray Energies Example
Layered (Compound) Shielding
Layered (Compound) Shielding Example
Half Value Layers
3
Half Value layers Example
Contents
Shielding Neutrons continued
Multipurpose Materials for neutron Shields
Possible Neutron Shield Options
Neutron Shielding Calculations Fast Neutrons
Neutron Shielding Calculations Alpha-Beryllium Sources
Neutron Shielding Calculations
Gamma and Neutron Shields General

General
Radiation energy
Shielding Material
Shielding Material - Lead
4
Contents
Shielding Gamma Rays continued
Tenth Value layers
Buildup
Buildup Factor
Buildup Factor Example
Determining the Required shield Thickness with Buildup
Shielding Neutrons
The Three Steps
1. Slow the Neutrons
2. Absorb the Neutrons
3. Absorb the Gamma rays
5
Contents
Gamma and Neutron Shields General continued
Shielding Material Water
Shielding Material Concrete
Streaming
Streaming Door Design
Streaming Labyrinth
Shine
Appendices
Appendix A Densities of Common Materials
Appendix B How to do a Linear Interpolation
Appendix C Range and Energy of Beta particles
Appendix D Transmission Curves
6
Appendix F Buildup Factors
General
August 25, 2009 7

General
Shielding calculations done by hand are often ballpark
approximations
The most accurate shielding calculations are performed by

computers
Shi
Shields
ld are often
ft over-designed
d i d so that
th t th
they can h
handle
dl
more intense sources of radiation that might be used in the
future
The photon shielding calculations in this handout only

apply to monoenergetic photons (e.g., gamma rays).
Shielding x-rays, which have a continuous range of
energies, is a specialized topic not considered here
8
General
The required shield thickness depends on three things:
1. Radiation Energy. The greater the energy of the

radiation (e.g., beta particles, gamma rays, neutrons) the
thicker the shield must be.
2. The shield material. For photons (x-rays, gamma rays)

the lower the atomic number of the shield, the thicker it
must be. For neutrons, the general rule is that the lower
the hydrogen content, the thicker the shield must be.
3. Radiation intensity. The higher the radiation intensity,

and the more it must be reduced, the thicker the shield.
9
August 25, 2009 10

For external alpha emitting sources, the alpha particles

themselves are not a radiation hazard. However, we must
consider the possibility that other types of radiation might
be present. This possibility must always be considered
when shielding any type of radiation!
While we might assume that an alpha emitter doesnt emit

gamma rays, it might actually do so. Pu-239 for example
emits a large number of gamma rays. Nevertheless, we
often consider Pu-239 a pure alpha emitter because the
gamma intensity is low .
11
Alpha emitters might also emit conversion electrons and

low energy x-rays.
Furthermore, alpha sources often contain trace quantities

of impurities some of which might emit beta particles.
These kinds of issues are primarily a concern when large

quantities of alpha emitters are handled, e.g., in glove
box facilities where curie and megacurie quantities might
be encountered.
12
Shielding Beta Particles
August 25, 2009 13

General
The dose from an external source of beta particles is

primarily to the skin. The penetrating power of betas is low
- approximately a few mm in tissue.
Beta particles, like alpha particles, can be completely

stopped by a shield. It rarely requires more than 5- 10 mm
of material to do so.
The material the shield is made of is not very important in

terms of its ability to stop the beta particles.
14
Beta Particle Range
Beta ranges are often expressed as a density thickness

which has units of g/cm2. These ranges can be
converted to centimeters as follows:
The easy way to estimate the range (in mg/cm2) of beta

particles is to obtain it from the graph on page 162 of the
PTP Radiological Health Handbook. The energy specified
on the graph is the maximum beta energy.
15
Beta Particle Range
Several equations approximate the range of betas, i.e., the

thickness of the shield required to stop all the betas.
The equation below (Feather's Rule) applies to betas with

a maximum energy above 0.6 MeV:
Range (g/cm2) = 0.542 E 0.133
E is the maximum energy (MeV)
The following equation applies to betas with a maximum

energy below 0.8 MeV:
Range (g/cm2) = 0.407 E1.38 16

Bremsstrahlung
While it is easy to completely stop beta particles, the very

act of doing so produces bremsstrahlung, a more
penetrating type of radiation. Shielding bremsstrahlung can
be more of a problem than shielding gammas.
A good
d shielding
hi ldi material
t i l ffor b
betas
t minimizes
i i i
bremsstrahlung i.e., low Z material such as plastic.
Like beta particles, bremsstrahlung photons have a range of

energies up to a maximum. The maximum energy of the
bremsstrahlung photons is the same as the maximum
energy of the betas. When shielding bremsstrahlung, we
can take the very conservative approach that all the
bremsstrahlung photons have this maximum energy. 17
Example calculation
A 1 Ci P-32 source (50 mls aqueous) is in a polyethylene
bottle (0.93 g/cm3). The effective atomic numbers of the
solution and vial wall are assumed to be 7.5.
a. How thick should the vial be?
b. What is the exposure rate at 1 meter due to

bremsstrahlung?
18
Example calculation
a. How thick should the vial be?
The maximum beta energy for P-32 is 1.71 MeV. From the
curve (p 162) in the PTP Radiological Health Handbook, the
maximum range of the P-32 betas is 800 mg/cm2 (0.8 g/cm2).
Essentially the same result is obtained using the equation:

Range (g/cm2) = 0.542 E 0.133
= 0.542 x 1.71 0.133
= 0.79 g/cm2
As such, the vial should be at least 0.86 cm thick ( 0.8 g/cm2

divided by 0.93 g/cm3).
19
Example calculation

bremsstrahlung?
The fraction of the beta energy released in the form of

bremsstrahlung g from interactions in the solution ((and to a
lesser extent in the vial wall) is calculated as follows:
20
Example calculation
bremsstrahlung? - continued
The beta energy emission rate from the 1 Ci P-32 source is:
= 3.7
3 7 x 1010 dps
d x 00.7
7MMeV
V per d
decay
= 2.59 x 1010 MeV/s
The bremsstrahlung energy emission rate is therefore:
= 0.0043 x 2.59 x 1010 MeV/s

= 1.11 x 108 MeV/s
21
Example calculation
The energy fluence rate (R) through a 1 cm2 area at 1 meter

is:
22
Example calculation

The dose rate to air is the energy fluence rate (MeV, cm-2, s-1)
times the mass energy absorption coefficient for air (cm2/g).
Absorbed dose rate = R x uen/D
Mass energy absorption coefficients apply to single photon

energies but bremsstrahlung photons have a range of
energies. A conservative assumption is that they all have an
energy of 1.71 MeV (the maximum energy for P-32).
The mass energy absorption coefficient for 1.71 MeV photons

23
in air is approximately 0.025 cm2/g.
Example calculation
Absorbed dose rate = R x u/D

= 883 ((MeV cm-2 s-1) x 0.025 cm2/g
g
= 22.1 MeV g-1 s-1
= 22.1 x 106 eV g-1 s-1
Since one ion pair is produced for every 34 eV absorbed by

the air, the ion pair production rate is:
= 22.1 x 106 (eV, g-1, s-1) / 34 (eV/ion pair)
= 0.65 x 10 6 ion pairs per gram per second
24
Example calculation
Since the charge produced in air for one member of each

ion pair is 1
1.6
6 x 10-19 C,
C the rate of charge production is :
= 0.65 x 10 6 (ion pairs g-1 s-1) x 1.6 x 10-19 C

= 1.23 x 10-13 C g-1 s-1
= 1.23 x 10-10 C kg-1 s-1
= 4.44 x 10-7 C kg-1 hr-1
25
Example calculation
Finally, the answer:
Since 2.58 x 10-4 C/kg equals 1 roentgen, the exposure rate

in R/hr is
= 4.44 x 10-7 (C kg-1 hr-1)/2.58 x 10-4 (C/kg)
= 1.72 x 10-3 R/hr

26
Shielding Positrons
August 25, 2009 27

Shielding Positrons
In general, positron energies (and the bremsstrahlung they
produce) tend to be higher than beta energies. Even so, the
positrons themselves are easy to stop. It requires at most a
cm or so of plastic.
The most important positron emitter, F-18, emits positrons

th t are off ffairly
that i l llow energy: maximum
i 633
633.5
5 kkeV,
V average
249.8 keV.
What we dont want to forget is that each emitted positron

will produce two 511 keV annihilation photons that must be
shielded. These annihilation photons are not always
mentioned in tables of decay data.
28
August 25, 2009 29

General
X0 is the exposure rate in the absence of shielding.
X0
Source
30
General
We want an equation that gives the exposure rate (X) when
shielding of a given thickness (x) is present.
X
Source
x
d
31
Basic Equation
The following basic equation assumes a narrow beam of

radiation penetrating a thin shield (a situation referred to as
"good geometry").
X is the exposure rate with the shield in place (e.g., R/hr)

Xo is the exposure rate without the shield (e.g., R/hr)
x is the thickness of the shield (e.g., cm)
u is the linear attenuation coefficient (e.g., cm-1).
The linear attenuation coefficient (u) is the probability of any

type of interaction (PE, CS, PP) per unit path length. 32
Basic Equation
Listings of the linear attenuation coefficient (u) are hard to

find. However, listings of a related quantity, the mass
attenuation coefficient (u/D), are easy to find.
The classic
Th l i listing
li ti off mass attenuation
tt ti coefficients
ffi i t iis th
thatt off
Hubbell. Hubbells tables can be found in the PTP
Radiological Health Handbook beginning on page 90.
The mass attenuation coefficient (u/D) is the probability of an

interaction (PE, CS, PP) per unit density thickness. Its units
are cm2/g. In other words, u/D is the probability of
interactions per g/cm2 travelled by the photon.
33
Basic Equation
The value of the mass attenuation coefficient depends on the

shielding material and the energy of the photons.
Nevertheless, mass attenuation coefficients for different

materials are very similar. For example, the following table
li t some mass attenuation
lists tt ti coefficients
ffi i t ffor 1 M
MeV
V photons.
h t
Shield Material u/D (cm2/g)
water 0.0707
concrete 0.0637
air 0.0636
iron 0.0599
The mass attenuation coefficient is the linear attenuation

34
divided by the density of the material.
Basic Equation
When using the mass attenuation coefficient instead of the

linear attenuation coefficient, the basic shielding equation is:
/ is the mass attenuation coefficient (cm2/g)

is the density of the shielding material (g/cm3)
Note, the units in the exponent must cancel out:

cm2/g x g/cm3 x cm
35
Basic Equation First example calculation
The exposure rate at a particular point is 100 R/hr due to

1332 keV gamma rays from Co-60. What would be the
resulting exposure rate if a 1 cm lead shield were employed
between the source and the point?
Warning!
In this example, we will use the basic equation which
assumes we have good geometry, i.e., a narrow beam and
thin shield. As we will see later, in the real world we rarely
have good geometry and this equation would result in an
underestimate of the exposure rate.
36
Basic Equation First example calculation
u/ is approximately 0.057 cm2/g (I eyeballed this)
actual is assumed to be the same as the theoretical density,

11.35 g/cm3
37
Basic Equation Second example calculation
The exposure rate at a particular point is 100 R/hr due to 662

keV gamma rays from Cs-137. What would be the resulting
exposure rate if a 1 cm lead shield were employed?
u/
is approximately
pp y 0.11 cm2/g
g ((I eyeballed
y this))
38
Relaxation Length
The relaxation length is the thickness of a shielding material

that will reduce the intensity of the radiation to 1/e (37%) of
its original intensity.
Relaxation length (cm) = 1/u
u is the linear attenuation coefficient (cm-1)
39
Calculating the required shielding thickness
The preceding equation can be rewritten as follows so as to

calculate the shielding thickness (x) necessary to achieve the
desired reduction in the exposure rate:
40
Calculating the required shielding thickness - Example
What thickness of a lead shield would be required to reduce

the exposure rate due to Cs-137 from 100 R/hr to 1 R/hr?
41
Shielding multiple gamma ray energies
Since the mass attenuation coefficient (u/D) depends on the

energy of the photons, the preceding shielding calculations
only work if the exposure rate is due to a single gamma ray
energy.
This works fine for Cs-137 which has a single gamma ray.
How do we handle the situation where the exposure rate is

due to more than one gamma ray energy, e.g., the two
gamma rays of Co-60 at 1173 keV and 1332 keV?
42
We could take a conservative approach and do the

calculation only using the highest of the gamma ray energies.
This overestimates the exposure rate and the required
shielding.
This approach might be reasonable for something like Co-60

where the two gamma rays are of similar energy and
contribute nearly equally to the exposure rate.
On the other hand, this approach could be a disaster for the

situation where the highest gamma ray energy contributes
only a little to the exposure rate (e.g., a high activity Am-241
source combined with a low activity Cs-137 source.) 43
The correct approach is to determine the exposure rate for

each gamma ray energy. Then we determine the attenuation
of each gamma ray energy as an independent calculation.
Here is an example problem of how this can be done

done.
The exposure rate at a particular point is 100 R/hr due to the

1173 and 1332 keV Co-60 gamma rays. What would be the
resulting exposure rate if a 1 cm lead shield were employed
between the source and the point? Once again, we assume
good geometry, i.e., a narrow beam and thin shield.
44
Shielding multiple gamma ray energies - Example
The 100 R/hr is the sum of the 1173 keV gamma ray (X1173)
and 1332 keV gamma ray (X1332 ) exposure rates.
X1173 and
d X1332 can be
b d
determined
t i d ffrom th
their
i specific
ifi gamma
ray constants: '1173 and '1332
The specific gamma ray constant for Co-60 (1.3 R m2 hr-1 Ci-1 )
is the sum of the specific gamma ray constants for the 1173
and 1332 keV gamma rays:
45
The specific gamma ray constant for a given gamma ray

energy can be calculated with the equation:
' is the specific gamma ray constant in R hr-1 m2 Ci-1

E is the gamma ray energy in MeV,
I is the gamma ray intensity (abundance)
uen/p is the mass energy absorption coefficient
46
The specific gamma ray constants for the two gammas are:
47
48
First we calculate the effect of 1 cm of lead on the 47 R/hr

due to the 1173 keV photons. The mass attenuation
coefficient is estimated to be 0.0625 cm2/g
49
Second we calculate the effect of 1 cm of lead on the 53 R/hr

due to the 1332 keV photons. The mass attenuation
coefficient is estimated to be 0.057 cm2/g
50
Finally we add the exposure rates for the 1173 and 1332 keV
gamma rays:
As expected, the exposure rate (51 R/hr) is not much

different from what we calculated when we assumed the
exposure rate was only due to the 1332 keV gamma ray (52
R/hr).
51
Layered (compound) Shielding
It is often the case that the shielding material consists of

several layers
X
Source
x1 x2
52
Layered (compound) Shielding
X
Source
x1 x2
53
Layered (compound) Shielding Example
The exposure rate at a particular point is 100 R/hr due to 662

keV gamma rays. Estimate the resulting exposure rate if a
shield consisting of 1 cm of lead and 2 cm of iron were
employed between the source and the point? Assume
good
good geometry,
geometry ii.e.,
e a narrow beam and thin shield
shield.
u/ is approximately 0.11 cm2/g for lead

u/ is approximately 0.075 cm2/g for iron
for the lead is assumed to be the same as its

theoretical density of 11.35 g/cm3
for the iron is assumed to be the same as its
theoretical density of 7.86 g/cm3 54
Layered (compound) Shielding Example
55
Half Value Layers
Instead of using attenuation coefficients to perform shielding

calculations, we can use half (or tenth) value layers. A half
value layer is the thickness of material that reduces the
radiation intensity by one-half.
The following equation using HVL's looks very similar to the

radioactive decay equation:
56
Half Value Layers
A mathematically equivalent form of this equation is:
Half value and tenth value layers for some materials can be
found in PTPs Radiological Health Handbook on page 79.
Dont be surprised if you see slightly different values in the

literature for the half value layers of different nuclides, e.g.,
0.6 cm or 0.65 cm for Cs-137 in lead.
57
Half Value Layers
The following table gives an idea as to the approximate half

value layer thicknesses for several shielding materials.
Energy Approximate Half Value Layers in cm (TVL in parentheses)

(MeV) Uranium Tungsten
g Lead Iron Concrete Water
0.5 0.51 1.0 3.30 7.62
1.0 0.76 1.52 4.57 9.91
1.5 1.27 1.78 5.84 12.19
2.0 1.52 2.03 6.60 13.97
Ir-192 0.28 0.33 0.48 1.27 4.5
Cs-137 0.65 (2.16) 1.6 (5.3) 4.8 (15.7)
Co-60 0.69 0.79 1.2 (4.0) 2.1 (6.9) 6.2 (20.6)
Ra-226 1.66 (5.5) 2.2 (7.4) 6.9 (23.4) 58
Half Value Layers - Example
The exposure rate is 100 R/hr due to a Cs-137 source. What

would the exposure rate be if the source were shielded with 2
cm of lead?
59
Tenth Value Layers
In a similar manner, a tenth value layer (TVL) is defined as

that thickness which will reduce the radiation intensity to one-
tenth of its original value. The equations for using TVL's are
as follows:
60
Buildup
When the exposure rate at a given distance from a point

source is calculated using the standard equation, we assume
scattered radiation doesnt contribute to the exposure rate.
Only those gamma rays originally directed to the point of
interest contribute.
contribute
Source
X
61
Buildup
Similarly, the shielding equations considered so far

assume no contribution from radiation scattered by the
shield towards the point of interest. This is the so-called
good geometry only possible with a narrow (collimated
beam) and a thin shield.
Collimated X
Source Shield 62
Buildup
For a broad beam or thick shield situation like that below,

radiation scattered in the shield contributes to the exposure
rate. This is the real world (bad geometry). Scattering of
radiation towards the point of interest is referred to as
buildup.
Source X
Shield 63
Buildup
To account for buildup, we can

incorporate a fudge factor known as
the buildup factor into our equations.
Source X
Shield
64
Buildup Factor
The buildup factor is a unitless

number greater than 1.
The value we assign to the buildup factor depends on three

things:
Shield material
Energy of the photons
Value of the equations exponent (:/D) D x (i.e., :x)
Buildup factors can be found on page 88 of PTPs

Radiological Health Handbook.
65
Buildup Factor
The equations exponent, the product ux , is sometimes

referred to as the number of mean free paths.
The mean free path (mfp) is the average distance a photon

travels before an interaction takes place. It is the reciprocal
off the
th linear
li attenuation
tt ti coefficient
ffi i t (u).
( )
66
Buildup Factor - Example
The exposure rate at a particular point is 100 R/hr due to

1332 keV gamma rays. What would be the resulting
exposure rate if a 1 cm lead shield were employed between
the source and the point? Assume poor geometry, i.e., a
broad beam and thick shield.
u/ is approximately 0.057 cm2/g
actual is assumed to be 11.35 g/cm3
B is estimated to be 1.2, based on an energy of 1332, and

a value of 0.647 for ux (number of mean free paths)
67
Buildup Factor - Example
68
Determining the Required Shield Thickness with Buildup
The following equation gives the shield thickness (x)

necessary to reduce the exposure rate from X0 to X:
A problem with this equation is that the buildup factor (B)

depends on the thickness of the shield (x), which is exactly
what we are trying to determine.
In other words, we cant determine B before we know x. 69

First approach - iteration
We could estimate B by guessing what x is likely to be.

Then we could plug B and x into the following equation, and
see how close we g
get to the required
q exposure
p rate X.
If X is too high, increase the shield thickness and redo the

calculation. Keep doing this until we find the shield thickness
that achieves the desired exposure rate. This approach is
referred to as iteration. An unsavory sledgehammer 70
approach to be sure, but it works.

Second approach energy absorption coefficient
We could eliminate the buildup factor in our equations by

substituting the mass energy absorption coefficient (:en/D) for
the mass attenuation coefficient (:/D) . Then we use the
following equation for x:
71
Although not technically correct, this approach is simple .
Third approach- computers
Swallow our pride and use a computer.
Computer
p calculations can p
produce very
y accurate results for
complicated shield and source geometries.
Computer modeling typically uses the Discrete Ordinates

Technique (DOT for short) or the Monte Carlo Technique.
The DOT is a numerical integration technique used to derive

solutions of the Boltzmann Transport equation in certain
simplified cases. 72
Third approach - computers
The Monte Carlo method uses extensive data tables and a

random number generator to mathematically "track"
thousands of simulated emissions of radiation through a
shield.
Perhaps the best known shielding code is Microshield
73
Fourth approach transmission curves
One way to determining the required shielding thickness (or

reduction in exposure rate due to a given shield thickness) is
to use a transmission curve that accounts for buildup.
Transmission curves are plots of transmission (X/Xo) versus

shield thickness for various radionuclides. Examples curves
are on page 82 of PTPs Radiological Health Handbook.
Alas, transmission graphs are only available for a limited

number of radionuclides and shield materials and therefore
have somewhat limited applicability. 74
Fourth approach transmission curves example
What thickness of lead shielding is required to reduce the

exposure rate due to Co-60 from 100 R/hr to 22 mR/hr?
75
Fourth approach transmission curves example
From the curve on page 83 of PTPs Radiological Health

Handbook, approximately 15 cm of lead correspond to a
transmission factor of 2.2 x 10-4
76
Shielding Neutrons
77
Neutron Shielding
The Three Steps
Shielding neutrons involves three steps:
1. Slow the neutrons
2. Absorb the neutrons
3. Absorb the gamma rays
78
Neutron Shielding
1. Slow the neutrons
Neutrons are slowed to thermal energies with
hydrogenous material: water, paraffin, plastic.
Water can evaporate or leak, paraffin is flammable and

plastic
l ti iis expensive.
i
To slow down very fast neutrons, iron or lead might be

used in front of the hydrogenous material.
79
Neutron Shielding
2. Absorb the neutrons
Hydrogenous materials are also very effective at
absorbing neutrons - the cross section for neutron
capture by H-1 is 0.33 barns.
Unfortunately, a difficult to shield 2.2

Unfortunately 2 2 MeV gamma ray is
emitted when H-1 absorbs a neutron.
Boron might be incorporated into the shield because it

has a large cross section for neutron absorption and only
emits a low energy capture gamma ray.
To slow down very fast neutrons, iron or lead might be

used in front of the hydrogenous material.
80
Neutron Shielding
3. Absorb the gamma rays
Gamma rays are produced in the neutron shield by

neutron (radiative) capture, inelastic scattering, and the
decay of activation products.
81
Neutron Shielding
Multipurpose Materials for Neutron Shields

Concrete, especially with barium mixed in, can slow and
absorb the neutrons, and shield the gamma rays.
Plastic with boron is also a g

good multipurpose
p p shielding
g
material.
82
Neutron Shielding
Possible Neutron Shield Options
Hydrogenous Gamma n
material shield
Combination material e.g.,

borated plastic or concrete
n
with barium
Hi Z moderator for fast

83
neutrons
Neutron Shielding
Neutron Shielding Calculations fast neutrons
Neutron shielding calculations are best done by computers.
Nevertheless, in some limited situations, it is possible to
employ a simplistic exponential equation similar to that used
for monoenergetic photons.
The following equation (Schaeffer 1973) describes the effect

of a given shielding material (e.g., steel) on fast neutron dose
rate. It only works if the there is at least 50 cm of water (or
equivalent hydrogenous material) behind the shield.
84
Neutron Shielding
Neutron Shielding Calculations fast neutrons
t H2O D
D is the dose rate with shield
D0 is the dose rate without shield

t is the shield thickness (e.g., cm)
ER is the neutron removal cross section (e.g., cm-1) 85
Neutron Shielding
alpha-beryllium sources
The following equation (modified from one in from NBS

Handbook 63) describes the effect of shield thickness on
the neutron dose rate associated with a radioactive neutron
source (e.g., AmBe).
B is a buildup factor usually assumed to be 5
86
Neutron Shielding
The following values for removal cross sections are from
NBS Handbook 63.
Removal Cross Section
Material
ER (cm-1)
water 0 103
0.103
iron 0.1576
ordinary concrete 0.0942
barytes concrete 0.0945
graphite 0.0785
For what it is worth, the removal cross section is

approximately 2/3 to 3/4 of the total cross section. 87
Neutron Shielding
In neutron shielding calculations, we might also use the
mass attenuation coefficient symbolized ER/D
According to Schaeffer (1973), the mass attenuation

coefficient (ER/D) for fast neutrons can be approximated with
your choice of one of the following:
ER/D = 0.19 Z-0.743 cm2/g (Z 8)

= 0.125 Z-0.565 cm2/g (Z > 8)
ER/D = 0.206 A-1/3 Z-0.294 ~ 0.206 (A Z)-1/3
ER/D = 0.21 A-0.58 88

Neutron Shielding
When the neutron mass attenuation coefficient (ER/D) is

employed instead of the neutron removal cross section, the
previous equation becomes:
89
Neutron Shielding
Another simple approach that might be possible is to

employ the neutron transmission/attenuation curves of
Allen and Futterer which can be found beginning on page
12 of PTPs Radiological Health Handbook.
These graphs provide dose reduction factors for neutrons

of specified energies as a function of shield thickness. The
shield is indicated to be polyethylene, but the graphs
provide conversion factors for water, concrete and soil
(NTS).
90
Gamma and Neutron Shields -
General
91
Gamma and Neutron Shields - General
General
Consider the possible use of temporary shielding (mobile or

fixed) rather than, or in addition to, permanent shielding.
Consider the consequences of the shield becoming

contaminated or
or, if neutrons are present
present, activated
activated.
If permanent shielding is used, consider the cost and ease

associated with dismantling it this might be necessary
when the facility is decommissioned. Concrete shields are
sometimes built with an inner (closest to the source) layer
that is intended to be removed at the end of the facilitys life.
92
General
If a source emits gamma rays at a variety of energies, the

high energy gamma rays sometimes determine the
shielding requirements. For example, even though the
1764 and 2204 keV gamma rays of radium sources
normally contribute very little to the exposure rate
rate, they
become the controlling radiation once the shield has
eliminated the more predominant low energy photons. The
HVL for Ra-226 is even larger than that for Co-60!
93
General
Consider the possible use of local shielding inside shielded

vaults/areas not normally occupied. For example shields
might be installed inside accelerator vaults near those
accelerator components most prone to activation. This
reduces doses during maintenance when the area is
temporarily occupied.
94
Radiation Energy
The lower the energy of the gamma rays or neutrons, the

easier it is to shield them (i.e., the thinner the shield needs
to be).
If a source emits gamma rays at a variety of energies, the

high energy gamma rays sometimes determine the
shielding requirements. For example, even though the
1764 and 2204 keV gamma rays of radium sources
normally contribute very little to the exposure rate, they
become the controlling radiation once the shield has
eliminated the more predominant low energy photons. The
HVL for Ra-226 is even larger than that for Co-60!
95
Shielding Material
For gamma rays, the higher the atomic number of the shield
material, the greater the attenuation of the radiation.
For neutrons, the lower the atomic number of the shielding

material,
t i l th
the greater
t ththe attenuation
tt ti off the
th radiation.
di ti
For both radiations, the greater the density of the shield

material the greater the attenuation of the radiation. Even
though water and air have essentially the same effective
atomic number, water is a better shield because it is
denser.
96
Shielding Material Lead
For attenuating photons
Advantages: C high atomic number (Z=82)
C moderately high density (11.34 g/cm3)
C easily machined and melted
C relatively inexpensive
Disadvantages:
lack of mechanical strength

chemical toxicity (some facilities require gloves for
handling) . Oxidized lead (white) is especially bad.
new lead can be naturally radioactive (Pb-210)
97
recycled lead is often contaminated
Lead is available in a variety of forms including:
standard bricks (4 x 8 x 2 approx 25-30 lbs)

interlocking bricks
sheets (typically 1/64 to 1/8
1/8 thick),
thick) including lead
backed drywall board and plywood
tape
wire
pipe
shot for filling voids
wool for filling voids
98
Leaded hardware/items of various types:
leaded louvers for vents

leaded hinges and handles for doors
lead covers for electrical switches and covers
lead-headed nails for installing lead sheets
lead plugs, caps for screw hole covers.
batten strips for joints and corners
lead glass for windows - it varies, but 4 mm of
typical lead glass is roughly equivalent to 1 mm of pure
lead
99
Shielding Material Tungsten Alloys
For attenuating photons. Tungsten alloys can contain

iron, copper, cobalt and nickel.
Advantages: C tungstens high atomic number (Z=74)

C veryy high
g density
y ((ca. 14 - 18 g
g/cm3)
C strong
C non-toxic
C thinner shields possible than with lead
Disadvantages:
very difficult to machine and fabricate

expensive 100
Shielding Material Depleted Uranium
For attenuating photons.
Advantages: C very high atomic number (Z= 92)

C very high density (19.1 g/cm3)
C good mechanical strength
C thinner shields possible than with lead
Disadvantages:
pyrophoric
expensive, but less so than tungsten
radioactive, hence there are regulatory issues with it
101
Shielding Material Water
For attenuating photons and neutrons
Advantages:
completely fills all voids unlike a solid shield
transparent
p
can manipulate source and equipment in water
inexpensive
source leaks can be detected by sampling water
Disadvantages: C it can leak

C it can evaporate
C a leaking source can contaminate large
102
volumes of the water
Shielding Material Concrete
For attenuating photons and neutrons
Advantages:
can also serve a structural role

can incorporate additives such as barium to improve
its characteristics
can be used to shield both neutrons and gamma rays
Disadvantages:
very thick walls can be needed

it can be difficult to modify and dismantle
103
Streaming
Cracks or voids in the shield can allow narrow beams

radiation to stream through the shield.
Such openings in a shield might be unavoidable, e.g.,

d
doors, penetrations
t ti for
f piping,
i i d
ducts,
t cables
bl ,etc.
t
Whenever possible, such openings should be curved or
angled so as to prevent the radiation from having a
straight shot through the shield. Even so, some gamma
rays and especially neutrons can scatter their way through
these openings.
Quantifying such streaming is best done with a computer.

104
Streaming
Penetrations in the shield should generally be at least

seven feet above the floor.
Consider filling any voids in such penetrations (e.g., with

lead shot).
Penetrations should not be directed toward occupied

areas or areas where there is traffic, e.g., stairways.
Determine if shields could be employed at ends of the

penetration.
105
Streaming Door design
Neutron streaming can be harder to minimize than gamma

streaming.
Wall Wall
Wall Wall
Door
Door
Overlap Overlap
106
Streaming Door design
It can be very difficult to prevent radiation from going

through the gap under a door.
Door
Scattered Radiation
Floor Insert
High atomic number inserts under a door can minimize
scattered gamma radiation. 107
Streaming - Labyrinth
A labyrinth (aka maze) might be employed at the entrance to

a shielded area.
This labyrinth prevents a line of site view of the source

while allowing equipment and material to be moved in or out
with relative ease.
It avoids the need for complicated door designs like those

shown in the previous slides.
The general rule is that the radiation must scatter at least

twice to reach the entrance.
108
Streaming - Labyrinth
SOURCE
LOCATION
Labyrinth/maze at
entrance to
minimize streaming
through door 109
Shine
Shine is a term that usually refers to radiation that has

penetrated a weak spot in the shielding and scattered.
One such weak spot is often the ceiling.
Sk shine
Sky hi
Shield
Source Ground shine
110
Shine
Radiation that goes over the shield and scatters in the air
towards the ground is known as sky shine.
Radiation that has gone through the floor and scattered

upwards in the ground is known as ground shine. The
latter is rarely a major concern.
The primary dose to the public near a nuclear facility (e.g.,

accelerator) is often due to sky shine. This is especially
true for neutrons.
111
Appendices
112

1 Ml11229a721

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1 Ml11229a721

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

1 Ml11229a721

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Shielding Radiation

Shielding Alpha Emitters

Gamma and Neutron Shields General

August 25, 2009 7

The most accurate shielding calculations are performed by

The photon shielding calculations in this handout only

1. Radiation Energy. The greater the energy of the

2. The shield material. For photons (x-rays, gamma rays)

3. Radiation intensity. The higher the radiation intensity,

August 25, 2009 10

For external alpha emitting sources, the alpha particles

While we might assume that an alpha emitter doesnt emit

Alpha emitters might also emit conversion electrons and

Furthermore, alpha sources often contain trace quantities

These kinds of issues are primarily a concern when large

August 25, 2009 13

The dose from an external source of beta particles is

Beta particles, like alpha particles, can be completely

The material the shield is made of is not very important in

Beta ranges are often expressed as a density thickness

The easy way to estimate the range (in mg/cm2) of beta

Several equations approximate the range of betas, i.e., the

The equation below (Feather's Rule) applies to betas with

Range (g/cm2) = 0.542 E 0.133

E is the maximum energy (MeV)

The following equation applies to betas with a maximum

Range (g/cm2) = 0.407 E1.38 16

While it is easy to completely stop beta particles, the very

Like beta particles, bremsstrahlung photons have a range of

a. How thick should the vial be?

b. What is the exposure rate at 1 meter due to

Essentially the same result is obtained using the equation:

As such, the vial should be at least 0.86 cm thick ( 0.8 g/cm2

b. What is the exposure rate at 1 meter due to

The fraction of the beta energy released in the form of

The bremsstrahlung energy emission rate is therefore:

= 0.0043 x 2.59 x 1010 MeV/s

The energy fluence rate (R) through a 1 cm2 area at 1 meter

b. What is the exposure rate at 1 meter due to

Absorbed dose rate = R x uen/D

Mass energy absorption coefficients apply to single photon

The mass energy absorption coefficient for 1.71 MeV photons

Absorbed dose rate = R x u/D

Since one ion pair is produced for every 34 eV absorbed by

Since the charge produced in air for one member of each

= 0.65 x 10 6 (ion pairs g-1 s-1) x 1.6 x 10-19 C

Finally, the answer:

Since 2.58 x 10-4 C/kg equals 1 roentgen, the exposure rate

= 4.44 x 10-7 (C kg-1 hr-1)/2.58 x 10-4 (C/kg)

= 1.72 x 10-3 R/hr

August 25, 2009 27

The most important positron emitter, F-18, emits positrons

What we dont want to forget is that each emitted positron

August 25, 2009 29

The following basic equation assumes a narrow beam of

X is the exposure rate with the shield in place (e.g., R/hr)

The linear attenuation coefficient (u) is the probability of any

Listings of the linear attenuation coefficient (u) are hard to