Diaphragm Walls and Stractures 55
Diaphragm Walls and Stractures 55
Diaphragm Walls and Stractures 55
From the technical options available, the choice will be These choices must take into account the risks described
made by reference to the following factors: in Paragraph 3 and be used to determine the require-
- the hydrology, ments in terms of:
- the geometry of the works, - possible cut-offs: walls, grouting,
- the external environment, - pumping installation (wells, wellpoints, etc.) and
- the contractual framework (e.g. maximum discharge monitoring devices (piezometers),
rate). (Refer to the tables at end of Paragraph 4, indicating the
scope of the different methods).
We give below options that can be adopted to control ground water during bulk excavation in different ground
conditions for deep retained excavations:
- in sandy soils,
- in rocky-like conditions,
- in competent soil with a more permeable soil stratum at depth.
Solution 1 Solution 2
Short wall and pumping Extending the wall downwards
This solution is possible: The deepening of the wall increases the head loss:
- if the discharge rate is environmentally acceptable, Q2 < Q1
- if the ground water can be effectively extracted
(extremely difficult for silts and very fine sands), Note: this deepening of the wall can be replaced by a
- if the external drawdown, Re, is permissible. grouted cut-off.
67