Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Diaphragm Walls and Stractures 55

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

GROUND WATER LOWERING - CUT-OFFS

2.3. Defining the Dewatering Project

From the technical options available, the choice will be These choices must take into account the risks described
made by reference to the following factors: in Paragraph 3 and be used to determine the require-
- the hydrology, ments in terms of:
- the geometry of the works, - possible cut-offs: walls, grouting,
- the external environment, - pumping installation (wells, wellpoints, etc.) and
- the contractual framework (e.g. maximum discharge monitoring devices (piezometers),
rate). (Refer to the tables at end of Paragraph 4, indicating the
scope of the different methods).

2.4. Examples of approaches for deep, retained excavations

We give below options that can be adopted to control ground water during bulk excavation in different ground
conditions for deep retained excavations:
- in sandy soils,
- in rocky-like conditions,
- in competent soil with a more permeable soil stratum at depth.

2.4.1. Excavation in sandy soils

Solution 1 Solution 2
Short wall and pumping Extending the wall downwards

This solution is possible: The deepening of the wall increases the head loss:
- if the discharge rate is environmentally acceptable, Q2 < Q1
- if the ground water can be effectively extracted
(extremely difficult for silts and very fine sands), Note: this deepening of the wall can be replaced by a
- if the external drawdown, Re, is permissible. grouted cut-off.

67

You might also like