Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Riprap Slope and Outlet Protection

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 10

Riprap Slope and Outlet Protection BMP 30

Description Riprap slope and outlet protection is created by an arranged layer or pile of
rock placed over the soil surface on slopes and at or below storm drain outfalls
or temporary dikes. Riprap used as slope protection protects against erosion
and dissipates the energy of runoff or surface water flow. Outlet protection
reduces the speed of concentrated stormwater flows, thereby reducing erosion
or scouring at stormwater outlets. In addition, outlet protection lowers the
potential for downstream erosion. This type of protection can be achieved
through a variety of techniques, including stone or riprap outlet structures and
armored scour holes installed below the storm drain outlet.

Applications For slope protection, use riprap or blanketed slopes. Outlet protection should
be installed at the outlets of all pipes, culverts, catch basins, sediment basins,
ponds, interceptor dikes, and swales or channel sections where the velocity of
flow may cause erosion in the receiving channel. Outlet protection should also
be used at outlets where the velocity of flow at the design capacity may result
in plunge pools (small, permanent pools located at an inlet or outfall).
Outlet protection should be installed early during construction activities, but
may be added at any time, as necessary.

Limitations Drainage area – 5 ac. Maximum slope – 40%


Minimum bedrock depth - N/A Minimum water table - N/A
NRCS soil type - ABCD Freeze/thaw – good
Drainage/flood control – no

The minimum particle size of the rock should be sized for the maximum
expected velocity of flow out of the outlet and the soil conditions where the
outlet will be located.

Targeted Sediment
Pollutants
Design The design of rock outlet protection depends entirely on the location. Pipe
Parameters outlets at the top of cuts or on slopes steeper than 10%, cannot be protected by
rock aprons or riprap sections due to reconcentration of flows and high
velocities encountered after the flow leaves the apron.

Tailwater depth: Tailwater depth immediately below the pipe outlet should be
determined for the design capacity of the pipe. If the tailwater depth is less
than half the diameter of the outlet pipe and the receiving stream is wide
enough to accept divergence of the flow, it should be classified as a minimum
tailwater condition. If the tailwater depth is greater than half the pipe diameter
and the receiving stream will continue to confine the flow, it should be
classified as a maximum tailwater condition. Pipes which outlet onto flat areas
with no defined channel may be assumed to have a minimum tailwater
condition.

IDEQ Storm Water Best Management Practices Catalog 97


September 2005
Apron Size: The apron length and width should be determined according to
the tailwater condition. If the pipe discharges directly into a well-defined
channel, the apron should extend across the channel bottom and up the channel
banks to an elevation 1 ft above the maximum tailwater depth or to the top of
the bank, whichever is less. The upstream end of the apron, adjacent to the
pipe should have a width two (2) times the diameter of the outlet pipe, or
conform to pipe end section if used.

Bottom Grade: The outlet protection apron should be constructed with no


slope along its length. There should be no overfall at the end of the apron. The
elevation of the downstream end of the apron should be equal to the elevation
of the receiving channel or adjacent ground.

Alignment: The outlet protection apron should be located so that there are no
bends in the horizontal alignment.

Materials: The outlet protection may be done using rock riprap, grouted riprap
or gabions (BMP 29-Gabions). Riprap size should be based on calculated shear
stress. It should be composed of a well-graded mixture of stone size so that
50% of the pieces, by weight, should be larger than the d50 size determined by
using the charts. A well-graded mixture as used herein is defined as a mixture
composed primarily of larger stone sizes but with a sufficient mixture of other
sizes to fill the smaller voids between the stones. The diameter of the largest
stone size in such a mixture should be 1.5 times the d50 size. Gabions to be
installed in stream banks should be designed and installed according to Rule
#9.3 of the Stream Channel Alterations, Rules and Regulations and Minimum
Standards, Idaho Department of Water Resources, 1978.

Thickness: The minimum thickness of the riprap layer should be 1.5 times the
maximum tone diameter for d50 of 15 in. or less; and 1.2 times the maximum
tone size for d50 greater than 15 in. Table 30 lists some examples.

Stone Quality: Stone for riprap should consist of field stone or rough unhewn
quarry stone. The stone should be hard and angular and of a quality that will
not disintegrate on exposure to water or weathering. The specific gravity of the
individual stones should be at least 2.5.

Recycled concrete equivalent may be used provided it has a density of at least


150 pounds per cubic ft and does not have any exposed steel or reinforcing
bars.

Filter: A filter is a layer of material placed between the riprap and the
underlying soil surface to prevent soil movement into and through the riprap.
Riprap should have a filter placed under it in all cases.

A filter can be of two general forms: A gravel layer or a plastic filter cloth. The
plastic filter cloth can be woven or non-woven monofilament yarns and should
meet these base requirements: thickness 10-60 mils, grab strength 90-120 lbs;
and should conform to ASTM D-1777 and ASTM D-1682.
IDEQ Storm Water Best Management Practices Catalog 98
September 2005
Gravel filter blanket, when used, should be designed by comparing particle
sizes of the overlying material and the base material. Design criteria are
available in any soils or civil engineering reference or from the National
Resources Conservation Service.

Construction ƒ The subgrade for the filter, riprap, or gabion should be prepared to the
Guidelines required lines and grades. Any fill required in the subgrade should be
compacted to a density of approximately that of the surrounding
undisturbed material.
ƒ The rock or gravel should conform to the specified grading limits when
installed respectively in the riprap or filter.
ƒ Filter cloth should be protected from punching, cutting, or tearing. Any
damage other than an occasional small hole should be repaired by placing
another piece of cloth over the damaged part or by completely replacing
the cloth. All overlaps whether for repairs or for joining two pieces of
cloth should be a minimum of 1 ft.
ƒ Stone for the riprap or gabion outlets may be placed by equipment. Both
should be constructed to the full course thickness in one operation and in
such a manner as to avoid displacement of underlying materials. The
stone for riprap or gabion outlets should be delivered and placed in a
manner that will insure that it is reasonably homogenous with the smaller
stones and spalls filling the voids between the larger stones. Riprap
should be placed in a manner to prevent damage to the filter blanket or
filter cloth. Hand placement will be required to the extent necessary to
prevent damage to the permanent works.
ƒ Complete construction of the outlet protection before allowing erosive
flows to pass through the outlet.

Maintenance Once a riprap outlet has been installed, the maintenance needs are relatively
low. Inspect after heavy storms and high flows for scouring under the outlet
and dislodged stones, and repair damage promptly. For dikes, maintain the
area upstream of the outlet structure so that accumulated sediments can be
removed when they reach a depth of one-third the height of the dike, or 12 in.,
whichever is less.

IDEQ Storm Water Best Management Practices Catalog 99


September 2005
Table 30-1. Rock Riprap Sizes and Thickness
Unit shear D50 (in.) dmax (in.) Minimum blanket thickness (in.)
stress (lb/ft2)

0.67 2 4 6

2.00 6 9 14

3.00 9 14 20

4.00 12 18 27

5.00 15 22 32

6.00 18 27 32

7.80 21 32 38

8.00 24 36 43

Unit shear stress calculated as T = yds


where:
T = shear stress in lb/ft2
y = unit weight of water, 62.4 lb/ft3
d = flow depth in ft
s = channel gradient in ft/ft

Design Procedure and Examples

ƒ Investigate the downstream channel to assure that non-erosive velocities can be


maintained.
ƒ Determine the tailwater condition at the outlet to establish which curve to use.
ƒ Enter the appropriate chart with the depth of flow and discharge velocity to
determine the riprap size and apron length required. It is noted that references to
pipe diameter in the charts are based on full flow. For other than full pipe flow,
the parameters of depth of flow and velocity should be used.
ƒ Calculate apron width at the downstream end if a flared section is to be employed.

Example 1: Pipe Flow (full) with discharge to unconfined section


A circular conduit is flowing full:
Q = 280 cfs, diam. = 66 in., tailwater (surface) is 2 ft above pipe invert, (minimum
tailwater condition)
Read d50 = 1.2 ft, and apron length 38 ft
Apron width = diam. + La = 5.5 + 38 = 43.5 ft

IDEQ Storm Water Best Management Practices Catalog 100


September 2005
Example 2: Box Flow (partial) with high tailwater
A box conduit discharging under partial flow conditions. A concrete box 5.5 x 10 ft is
flowing 5.0 ft deep, Q = 600 cfs and tailwater surface is 5 ft above invert (Max. tailwater
condition).
V = Q = 600 = 12 fps
A 5x10
At the intersection of the curve d = 60 in. and V = 12 fps, read d50 = 0.4 ft
Then reading to the d = 60 in. curve, read apron length = 40 ft
Apron width, W = conduit width + 0.04 La = 10+(0.4) (40) = 26 ft

Example 3: Open Channel Flow with Discharge to Unconfined Section


A trapezoidal concrete channel 5 ft wide with 2:1 side slopes is flowing 2 ft deep, Q =
180 cfs (velocity = 10 fps) and the tailwater surface downstream is 0.8 ft (minimum
tailwater condition).
At intersection of the curve d-24 ft and V = 10 fps, read d50 = 0.7 ft
Then reading up to the d = 24 in. curve, read apron length = 22 ft
Apron width, W = bottom of width of channel + La = 5 + 22 = 27 ft

Example 4: Pipe flow (partial) with discharge to a confined section


A 48 in. pipe is discharging with a depth of 3 ft, Q = 100 cfs, and discharge velocity of 10
fps (established from partial flow analysis) to a confined trapezoidal channel with a 2 ft
bottom, 2:1 side slopes, n = .04, and grade of 0.6%.
Calculation of the downstream channel (by Manning’s Equation) indicates a normal
depth of 3.1 ft and normal velocity of 3.9 fps.
Since the receiving channel is confined, the maximum tailwater condition controls.
At the intersection of d = 36 in. and v = 10 fps, Read d50 = 0.3 ft
Reading up to the d = 36 in. curve, read apron length = 30 ft
Since the maximum flow depth in this reach is 3.1 ft that is the minimum depth of riprap
to be maintained for the entire length.

IDEQ Storm Water Best Management Practices Catalog 101


September 2005

You might also like