Reducing The Risk of High Temperature Hydrogen Attack (HTHA) Failures
Reducing The Risk of High Temperature Hydrogen Attack (HTHA) Failures
Reducing The Risk of High Temperature Hydrogen Attack (HTHA) Failures
(2012) 12:624–627
DOI 10.1007/s11668-012-9605-x
LESSONS LEARNED
123
J Fail. Anal. and Preven. (2012) 12:624–627 625
123
626 J Fail. Anal. and Preven. (2012) 12:624–627
carbon steel curve, or chromium alloyed steel should be 7. Providing definite safe operating limits with necessary
considered for use instead. The selection of a 1 Cr– Mo process alarms and a response plan when those limits
material would be the preferred choice. are exceeded.
Using API 941, the following practices should be
considered:
1. Selecting the proper material for the operating condi- Lined Equipment
tions, and for increased temperatures, considering the
use of alloys with higher weight percents of chromium For corrosion purposes, sometimes vessels are clad, lined,
and molybdenum. or weld overlaid to protect the vessel surface. This can
2. Using actual operating temperatures for assessing provide initial protection, provided hydrogen does not
HTHA susceptibility and validating that the actual diffuse through the liner or migrate behind the lining or
operating temperatures and pressures are below API cladding. If that occurs, then the vessel wall may be sus-
941 curve by a defined amount. ceptible to HTHA.
3. Employing experienced individuals who understand the Refractory lining is often used to insulate a pipe or
HTHA phenomenon as well as the API 941 recom- vessel to lower the metal wall temperature and is an
mended practices. effective way to reduce the effects of HTHA. However, the
refractory can degrade, crack, or deteriorate due to oper-
ating conditions or even flexure of the refractory, allowing
hot spots to form, which would elevate the metal wall
Operating Conditions
temperature and possibly result in exceeding the HTHA
operating limits of the equipment. Figure 4 illustrates
To perform an adequate assessment of HTHA suscepti-
how a degraded refractory and hot spot could result in
bility, the operating conditions of the equipment must be
exceeding the operating temperature limit for a carbon steel
known. Typical or possible design limits are not suffi-
line.
cient. A good HTHA assessment requires validation of
One way to monitor the condition of the refractory is to
data with process engineering involvement and actual
perform regular infrared imaging of the equipment. (An
field data. The key parameter is that the actual conditions
example is illustrated in Fig. 5.)
to which the metal wall has been exposed must be
For clad, lined, or overlaid equipment the following
known.
practices should be considered:
In determining the actual conditions, the placements of
temperature and pressure indicators are important, as well 1. Ensuring that proper foundation support for refractory-
as knowing whether excursions and process creep condi- lined equipment is in place to reduce flexure of the
tions have occurred over a period of time. Once the HTHA refractory.
limits are determined, safe operating limits with necessary 2. Performing regular infrared inspections, especially on
process alarms should be established, and a response plan refractory-lined equipment.
should be implemented for safe operations when those 3. Ensuring that the operating limit is understood, and
limits are exceeded. Plant operations should consider the appropriate actions are taken if the limit is exceeded.
following practices:
1. Performing regular process hazard assessment of the
operating conditions including changes in pressure,
temperatures or partial pressure of hydrogen.
2. Verifying the actual operating conditions that
the equipment experiences through good field data.
3. Installing pressure and temperature indicators at loca-
tions that measure the actual operating conditions of
equipment that could be susceptible to HTHA.
4. Determining whether process creep that may affect the
metal has occurred.
5. Evaluating material or operating changes using a
management of change (MOC) process. Fig. 4 Illustration of API 941 (Nelson) curve—damaged refractory
6. Evaluating whether temperature excursions and regener- can result in an increase in the metal wall temperature which if above
ation operations have an effect on HTHA susceptibility. the recommended limits could result in HTHA failure
123
J Fail. Anal. and Preven. (2012) 12:624–627 627
123
http://www.springer.com/journal/11668