Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
151 views

Rak-43.3520 Fire Simulation: Simo Hostikka

The document provides an overview of a fire simulation course. It outlines the course contents and schedule, prerequisites, learning objectives, and an introduction to fire simulation using FDS. Key points include an overview of the weekly topics on fire dynamics concepts, an introduction to FDS interfaces and exercises, and a discussion of different fire simulation models from plume to CFD models like FDS. The document aims to prepare students for using performance-based fire simulation and risk analysis tools.

Uploaded by

marmoladyna
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
151 views

Rak-43.3520 Fire Simulation: Simo Hostikka

The document provides an overview of a fire simulation course. It outlines the course contents and schedule, prerequisites, learning objectives, and an introduction to fire simulation using FDS. Key points include an overview of the weekly topics on fire dynamics concepts, an introduction to FDS interfaces and exercises, and a discussion of different fire simulation models from plume to CFD models like FDS. The document aims to prepare students for using performance-based fire simulation and risk analysis tools.

Uploaded by

marmoladyna
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 23

Rak-43.

3520
Fire simulation
1. lecture 13.1.2016
Simo Hostikka
Lecture contents

• Course contents and schedule


• Prerequisites
• Course delivery, materials
• Learning outcomes
• Introduction to fire simulation
• ”Hands on FDS”

1/12/2016
2
Course schedule
Date Topic
1 13.1.2016 Introduction, Simulation models, CFD, FDS
2 20.1.2016 Heat transfer
3 27.1.2016 Combustion
4 3.2.2016 Smoke extraction
FDS user interfaces, simulation exercise
5 10.2.2016 Pressure and HVAC
6 24.3.2016 Evacuation, FDS+Evac (Timo Korhonen / VTT)
7 2.3.2016 Pyrolysis, flame spread
8 9.3.2016 Fire suppression systems (Jukka Vaari / VTT)
9 16.3.2016 Verification and validation
10 23.3.2016 Fire risk analysis

1/12/2016
3
Lectures and exercises

Both lectures and exercises in R002/266 (computer class) at


Wednesdays btw 9-12.
- 1-2 h for lecture
- 1-2 h for starting the weekly exercise
- Teacher available for advice and help

1/12/2016
4
Prerequisites

Fire dynamics
Computer skills
- Text editing (ascii-editor)
- Data management
- Recommendation is Matlab. Ready-made Matlab –scripts will be
made available for plotting the simulation results.
- Excel etc..
- Computing skills

1/12/2016
5
Course delivery

• Weekly exercise
• Returned to MyCourse by Tuesday midnight.
• Solution feedback in the beginning of the lecture.
• Weight: 50 % of course grading.
• Individual project work:
• Weight: 50 %.
• Topic: Evacuation safety assessment in building fire.
• Return by 13.4.2016.

1/12/2016
6
Materials

FDS-SMV documentation
http://firemodels.github.io/fds-smv/
Books:
SFPE handbook of Fire Protection Engineering
Drysdale, D.: An Introduction to Fire Dynamics. 3. tai 4. painos.
Karlsson & Quintiere: Enclosure Fire Dynamics
Others
INSTA 950: Fire Safety Engineering — Comparative method to
verify fire safety design in buildings.

1/12/2016
7
Learning objectives

After the course, you will


- Understand the priciples of computer fire simulation.
- Know the fire risk analysis principles
- Can calculate fire-driven flows
- Can estimate the heat exposure from a fire to the surrounding
structures.
- Can specify the boundary conditions for fire scenarios.
- Use the simulation for dimensioning smoke exhaust, evacuation
arrangements, and fire suppression.

1/12/2016
8
Performance-based fire safety design

• Finnish fire-regulations: ”Oletettuun palonkehitykseen perustuva


suunnittelu”, design based on assumed fire development.
• Assume a design fire, and assess the consequences.
• Problem: ”Design fire” is a completely artificial concept.
• Alternatives for design fire
• HRR prediction (very hard)
• Consideration of all possible fires (laborous)
• Equally acceptable means of designing as the traditional,
prescribtive method.
• Can be performed as absolute (risk-based) or comparative.

1/12/2016
9
Modelling methods from the
viewpoint of risk
Deterministic methods
- Consequences of a design fire
- Fire development
- Human behaviour
- Response of structures and systems
Probabilistic methods
- Ignition frequency
- Chains of events
- Success of responding activities
- Variation of initial and boundary conditions

1/12/2016
10
Fire simulation models in the
increasing order of complexity
1. Fire plume models
2. Zone models
3. Network models
4. Computational Fluid Dynamics, CFD (field models)

1/12/2016
11
Fire plume models

5 / 3 & 1/ 3
m(Q, z ) = 0.076 × z Q
&
Palopatsaan massavirta korkeuden funktiona
20
0.1 MW 1 MW

15

Korkeus (m)
5 MW

10

0
0 50 100 150 200
Massavirta (kg/s)
Heskestad 1986 (Drysdale)

1/12/2016
12
Zone models
• Smoke spreading in buildings
• Engineering tool of 1990’s Tu
• Strong assumptions
• Fast to run
• Programs: HOT
ZONE TL
• CFAST
• OZone Hi

COLD
ZONE

1/12/2016
13
Computational Fluid Dynamics

1/12/2016
14
Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS)

• Open source CFD-code for fire-driven flows.


• Main developer: National Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST).
• Other developers: VTT Ltd., Jensen Hughes Ltd, Aalto,…
• Efficient flow solver combined with FSE consepts and physical
models.
• Two parts:
• FDS –solver
• Smokeview (SMV): post-processing.
• Input data using text files.

1/12/2016
15
FDS history

1978: Small Mach Number Combustion Equations (Rehm & Baum)


1990 ~ Kevin McGrattan started at NIST
1990’s: LES3D, Industrial fire simulator, ALOFT
2000 FDS1
2001 FDS2
2002 FDS3
2004 FDS4
2007 FDS5
2013 FDS6

1/12/2016
16
FDS applicability

Applies for Does not apply for


• Flows • Explosions (detonations)
• Smoke transport • Molecular level phenomena
• Gas transport
• Fire spreading*
• Sprays and cooling
• Suppression *

• Human behaviour

*) with possibly great uncertainty

1/12/2016
17
Fluid dynamics calculations

• Solving time dependent Navier-Stokes equations (their numerical


form).
• Consists of
• Physics
• Boundary conditions
• Initial conditions
• Spatial discretization
• Time discretization
• Post processing

1/12/2016
18
My first FDS-simulation
&HEAD CHID='mycase'/

&TIME T_END=10.0 /

1. Create a new folder under Z:\Documents. &MESH ID='MESH',


IJK=10,10,20,
2. Create a new text file with ending .fds XB = 0,1,0,1,0,2 /
(e.g. mycase.fds).
&REAC FUEL = 'N-HEPTANE'
3. Open the file and write the text lines: SOOT_YIELD = 0.02 /
4. Open the command prompt (shell). &SURF ID = 'Fire'
5. CD to the simulation directory and run the COLOR = 'RED'
HRRPUA = 2000. /
simulation as
&VENT SURF_ID='Fire'
> fds mycase.fds XB = .3,.7,.3,.7,0,0
6. Open the result files mycase.smv and IOR = 3 /

mycase_hrr.csv &TAIL /

Congratulations for the first (fire) simulation!

1/12/2016
19
Assignment 1: Turbulent flow over
backward -facing step
Flow over a backward –facing step is a classical problem of fluid
dynamics. The task is to predict the region of flow separation,
reattachment point and the resulting speed distribution.
The difficulty depends on the inflow speed.

U0

1/12/2016
20
Assignment 1: Boundary conditions
L0 L1

U0 8H OPEN
z
H x

ReH = rU0H/m = 36000 Dx = H/10


Þ U0= 0.50 m/s H=1m
http://turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/backstep_val.html L0= 10H, L1= 15H
Driver, D. M. and Seegmiller, H. L., "Features of 2-dimensional case
Reattaching Turbulent Shear Layer in Divergent (1 cell in y-direction)
Channel Flow," AIAA Journal, Vol. 23, No. 2, Feb 1985,
pp. 163-171.

1/12/2016
21
Assignment 1: Input

Input file should contain at least the following files:


• Heading (&HEAD)
• Time range (&TIME)
• Domain and mesh definition (&MESH)
• Inflow boundary condition (&SURF and &VENT)
• Outflow boundary condition (&VENT SURF_ID=’OPEN’ …)
• Define the ’step’ using a physical obstruction (&OBST)
• Measurements for ouputs (&DEVC, use POINTS-feature)
• End-of-file statement (&TAIL)
For more advanced options, see section ’8.2 Backward Facing Step’
of FDS Validation Guide.
1/12/2016
22
Assignment 1: Tasks
FDS simulation Report
1. Carry out the 2D simulation untill a 1. CSV file with columns:
steady state is reached. 1. Z-coordinate at x/H=-4
2. Find out what is sufficiently long 2. U(z) at x/H=-4
time for steady conditions. 3. Z-coordinate at x/H=1
3. Record the x-direction velocity 4. U(z) at x/H=1
component (U) distribution at 5. U(z) at x/H=4
positions 6. U(z) at x/H=6
x/H = -4
x/H = 1 2. Comparison against measured
x/H = 4 non-dimensional velocities U/U0
x/H = 6 (data and matlab-script in
MyCourses)
3. Picture of instantaneous field of U-
velocity (SLCF) at final time.
4. FDS input file (*.fds)

1/12/2016
23

You might also like