Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 400 views

    Anova

    Uploaded by

    Dewi Hardianti
    This document contains statistical analysis of test scores from 4 different formulas. The mean scores were: formula 1 (29.33), formula 2 (28), formula 3 (25), and formula 4 (26.67). An ANOVA test found a significant difference in scores between the formulas with p=<0.001. Post hoc tests revealed formula 3 had significantly lower scores than formulas 1 and 2, and formula 1 had significantly higher scores than formula 4.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Anova

    Uploaded by

    Dewi Hardianti
    400 views2 pages
    This document contains statistical analysis of test scores from 4 different formulas. The mean scores were: formula 1 (29.33), formula 2 (28), formula 3 (25), and formula 4 (26.67). An ANOVA test found a significant difference in scores between the formulas with p=<0.001. Post hoc tests revealed formula 3 had significantly lower scores than formulas 1 and 2, and formula 1 had significantly higher scores than formula 4.

    Original Description:

    Analisis of Variance

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains statistical analysis of test scores from 4 different formulas. The mean scores were: formula 1 (29.33), formula 2 (28), formula 3 (25), and formula 4 (26.67). An ANOVA test found a significant difference in scores between the formulas with p=<0.001. Post hoc tests revealed formula 3 had significantly lower scores than formulas 1 and 2, and formula 1 had significantly higher scores than formula 4.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    400 views2 pages

    Anova

    Uploaded by

    Dewi Hardianti
    This document contains statistical analysis of test scores from 4 different formulas. The mean scores were: formula 1 (29.33), formula 2 (28), formula 3 (25), and formula 4 (26.67). An ANOVA test found a significant difference in scores between the formulas with p=<0.001. Post hoc tests revealed formula 3 had significantly lower scores than formulas 1 and 2, and formula 1 had significantly higher scores than formula 4.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 2

    Oneway

    Descriptives

    ulangan

    95% Confidence Interval for Mean

    N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound Minimum Maximum

    formula 1 3 29.33 1.155 .667 26.46 32.20 28 30

    formula 2 3 28.00 .000 .000 28.00 28.00 28 28

    formula 3 3 25.00 .000 .000 25.00 25.00 25 25

    formula 4 3 26.67 .577 .333 25.23 28.10 26 27

    Total 12 27.25 1.765 .509 26.13 28.37 25 30

    Test of Homogeneity of Variances

    ulangan

    Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.

    11.733 3 8 .003

    ANOVA

    ulangan

    Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

    Between Groups 30.917 3 10.306 24.733 .000

    Within Groups 3.333 8 .417

    Total 34.250 11

    Post Hoc Tests


    Multiple Comparisons

    ulangan
    Bonferroni

    95% Confidence Interval


    (I) (J) Mean Difference
    perlakuan perlakuan (I-J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound

    formula 1 formula 2 1.333 .527 .212 -.50 3.17

    formula 3 4.333* .527 .000 2.50 6.17

    formula 4 2.667* .527 .006 .83 4.50

    formula 2 formula 1 -1.333 .527 .212 -3.17 .50

    formula 3 3.000* .527 .003 1.17 4.83

    formula 4 1.333 .527 .212 -.50 3.17

    formula 3 formula 1 -4.333* .527 .000 -6.17 -2.50

    formula 2 -3.000* .527 .003 -4.83 -1.17

    formula 4 -1.667 .527 .080 -3.50 .17

    formula 4 formula 1 -2.667* .527 .006 -4.50 -.83

    formula 2 -1.333 .527 .212 -3.17 .50

    formula 3 1.667 .527 .080 -.17 3.50

    *. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.

    You might also like