Boom (1985) Dynamic Behaviour of Mooring Lines PDF
Boom (1985) Dynamic Behaviour of Mooring Lines PDF
Boom (1985) Dynamic Behaviour of Mooring Lines PDF
l
Moreover no d a t a on f l u i d r e a c t i v e f o r c e s A mooring l i n e connected t o a s t r u c t u r e
were a v a i l a b l e and no v a l i d a t i o n o f t h e a l - f l o a t i n g i n i r r e g u l a r waves, w i n d and c u r -
g o r i t h m was g i v e n . The e x p l i c i t c e n t r a l d i f - r e n t i s s u b j e c t e d t o l i n e - e n d loads, weight,
f e r e n c e method was p r o v e n t o p r o v i d e c o n d i - buoyancy, sea f l o o r r e a c t i o n f o r c e s , l i n e j
t i o n a l l y stable solutions f o r the given i n e r t i a and f l u i d l o a d i n g . B e a r i n g i n mind I
[A .]
nJ
=
I:: s i nL7
-sinF cos7
-sinT
cos27
j
j
cos7
. . (5)
Line springs
(mass points)
1
X
Fig. 1. D i s c r e t i z a t i o n o f mooring l i n e by a
lumped mass method
X . ( ~ + A T=)- 1 {zx(r+Ar) - ~ x . ( T ) +
J A r2 - -J
+ ~ x . ( T - A T ) - x.(r-ZAr)}
-3 -J
or:
X . ( T + A T=) 5I L ~ ( T- ) 2 x . ( r - A T ) +
where: -J -J
fD. = drag force in local CO-.ordinates 1
+ - x.(T- AT) + - 1 2..
Ar x . ( r + A r )
- J = r e l a t i v e f l u i d velocity in local 2 -J 2 -J
U.
-J
CO-ordinates . . . . . . . (17)
c . = c u r r e n t vector in global co-ordinates The segment tension T.(r+Ar) i s derived
-JP = f l u i d s p e c i f i c density from the node positions & a Newton-Raphson
D = c h a r a c t e r i s t i c segment diameter i t e r a t i o n using the additional c o n s t r a i n t
a = segment length equation f o r t h e c o n s t i t u t i v e s t r e s s - s t r a i n
CD,, = normal drag c o e f f i c i e n t relation.
tangential drag c o e f f i c i e n t . 2 Tj ( T )
CDtTLe d i r e c t i o n a l matrices IT-] and [ Q . ] Qj ( r ) = a . { A X . ( T ) - (1 .+. -) }
J -J EA.
a r e used t o transform the globs;/ v e l o c i t i g s J
i n t o local v e l o c i t i e s (11) and the local
drag force components i n t o global forces ( 8 )
respectively.
where:
9 = segment length e r r o r vector
S . . , $.,
.T k -- t e n t a t i v e sJgment tension vector a t the
S . . ,
. . . . . . . . . . . (22)
BOUNDARY
CONDITION
C, = EA 6,la 2
UPPER-END P O S I T I O N
l FzE-2 VELOCITIES
DRAG F O R C E S
For t h e usual types of mooring l i n e s
SIMULATION
ACCELERATIONS resonant response of separate masses in t h e
lumped parameter model will not provide
s i g n i f i c a n t p a r a s i t i c a l motions. This even
holds t r u e f o r c l u s t e r s of masses. The oc-
currence of such may be prevented by in-,
creasing t h e number of nodes thus reducing
l
, ,
the nodal mass and element length.
CORRECTION OF TENSION
I
N O D E MOTIONS
3. VALIDATION STUDY
e F I .l
,P .i-N-A
STATISTICAL
;
\y.;M l N d R Y
3.1 Harmonic o s c i l l a t i o n t e s t s
Model t e s t s u t i l i z i n g harmonic upper-end
forced o s c i l l a t i o n s of the l i n e a t f i v e f r e -
quencies f o r eleven combinations. The water
depths ranged from 75 m t o 608 m. Chains,
s t e e l wires and chain-wire combi-l i n e s were
i n v e s t i g a t e d . For these t e s t s , which were
l c a r r i e d out according t o Froude's law of
i
Fig. 3 . DYNLINE flow diagram s i m i l i t u d e , use was made of s t e e l s t u d l e s s
chain and wire. The scale r a t i o s ranged from
19 to 76. I t should be noted t h a t t h e chain
On the basis of t h e known l i n e angles t h e l i n k s of the 1.0 and 2.0 mm chain were c u t
f l u i d i n e r t i a matrix i s found from equation a t one side. The EA-values were derived from
( 2 ) . Line v e l o c i t i e s a r e obtained from equa- tension-elongation t e s t s .
t i o n (16) r e s u l t i n g i n drag forces by use of The o s c i l l a t i o n t e s t s were c a r r i e d out i n
equations ( 8 ) through (11). Soil reaction t h e 220 m X 4 m X 4 m and the 240 m X 18 m X
forces are derived from equation (15). Know- 8 m basins of N.S.M.B. During the t e s t s t h e
ing t h e i n e r t i a matrices and the right-hand forced o s c i l l a t i o n , generated by means of a
s i d e of equation (1) t h e a c c e l e r a t i o n s f o r mechanical l a r g e stroke o s c i l l a t o r , was mea-
the new time s t e p a r e solved. Displacements sured by means of a potentiometer. The up-,
follow from equation ( 1 7 ) . A correction of per-end l i n e tension and v e r t i c a l angle were
tension i s predicted by equation (19) using measured by means of a two-component f o r c e
the segment length e r r o r from equation ( 1 8 ) . transducer while the tension a t t h e anchor
The whole procedure i s repeated u n t i l an point was measured by means of a ring-type
acceptable accuracy i n tension i S obtained. f o r c e transducer. The motions of t h e l i n e
In t h a t case t h e simulation i s proceeded were recorded by underwater video. The mea-
with the next time s t e p by applying t h e next sured tensions were d i r e c t l y compared w i t h
boundary condition ( 20). t h e DYNLINE resul t s . Moreover comparisons
were c a r r i e d out on t h e basis of t h e Dynamic
2.4 Discretization effects Tension Amp1 i f i c a t i o n (DTA) defined as am-
Geometric d i s c r e t i z a t i o n i s an important p1 i f i c a t i o n of the maximum t o t a l quasi-
aspect of t h e lumped mass modelling. The s t a t i c tension, i . e . the s t a t i c tension a t
number of nodes should be s u f f i c i e n t t o t h e maximum excursion. Fig. 4 shows t h e
describe t h e l i n e p o s i t i o n . Moreover para- s t a t i c l oad-excursi on c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s , t h e
s i t i c a l motions of the lumped masses may numerical d i s c r e t i z a t i o n and the dynamic
occur. The tangential s t i f f n e s s of a s i n g l e tension amplification f o r 152 mm chain a t
lumped mass i s l i n e a r l y dependent on t h e 150 m water depth. For a 76 mm chain-wire
re1 a t i ve tangential displacement: combi-line i n 608 m water depth t h e s e
r e s u l t s a r e presented in Fig. 5.
3.2 I r r e g u l a r wave t e s t s
Because of t h e non-l i n e a r phenomena
~ D Y N L I N E Measured Oscillation T, I involved, t h e ultimate val idation of the
developed computer program was c a r r i e d out
by means of model t e s t s in i r r e g u l a r waves.
A model of a f l o a t i n g s t r u c t u r e was moored
by means of two p a r a l l e l l i n e s and a ten-.
sioning weight as shown by Fig. 6.
Measured Oscillation
o S = 4..l m
-10
X 1 0
M
H
-5 W
H
X in m
Line discretization
-1000 J _I
I I I I 1
0 50 100 150 200
TIME
S
l0 - 300 ,
X1
WAVE
M
-10 E 200 -
l0
/'
- 100
X 1
M v
1000 2000
X in m
Line discretization
2500
T-NODE12
KN
"reduced O
dynamics"
-2500
2500
T-NODE12
KN
-2500 -)
I I I 1
0 50 ' 100 150 200
S TIME
S
T-.NODE17
r e s u l t s for w l
I I l I I
0 50 100 150 200
TIME
S