Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68 (2017) 316–332

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/rser

Comprehensive overview of grid interfaced solar photovoltaic systems

⁎
crossmark
Om Prakash Mahela , Abdul Gafoor Shaik
Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Jodhpur 342011, India

A R T I C L E I N F O A BS T RAC T

Keywords: Grid-connected solar photovoltaic (PV) systems are increasingly attracting the attention of industry and
DC-DC converter academia mainly motivated by potential to provide an alternative to the conventional fossil fuel generation. This
Grid integration helps to meet out the increasing energy demands and to limit the pollution of environment caused by fossil
Inverter emissions. This paper presents a comprehensive overview of the grid-connected solar PV systems. The intention
Maximum power point tracking
of this review is to provide a wide spectrum on architecture of grid-connected solar PV system and its
PV array
Solar photovoltaic system
constituent components such as solar cell, PV array, maximum power point tracking, filters, DC-DC converters,
single-phase inverters, and three-phase inverters to the researchers, designers, and engineers working on solar
energy and its integration into the utility grid. Brief overview of control techniques for the single and three-
phase inverters has also been presented. More than 100 research publications on the topologies, configurations,
and control techniques of grid-connected solar PV systems and their major constituent components have been
thoroughly reviewed and classified for quick reference.

1. Introduction energy generated by a PV generator into the utility grid. High efficiency
of these converters is a major requirement [7]. The solution to control
Renewable energy (RE) sources are very good solution to provide the power injected into the grid are essential for effectiveness of the
alternative energy to overcome the global energy problem. Further, the system. In the real and reactive power control system, the real power
development in grid integration technologies, for these resources output reference is a function of the incident solar irradiance and the
during the last decade, has increased the use of RE sources [1]. Solar temperature of the pn diode junction. The reactive power output
photovoltaic (PV) system has become a promising RE source due to its reference is selected based on the system rating and adopted voltage
capability of generating electricity in a very clean, quiet, and reliable regulation scheme [8].
way. The PV systems are solar energy supply systems, which either This paper aims at presenting a comprehensive overview on the
supply power directly to an electrical gazette in its stand alone mode or topic of grid-connected solar PV systems. Over 100 research publica-
feed energy into the utility electricity grid in its grid-connected mode tions [1–133] are critically reviewed and classified broadly into six
[2]. As the cost of PV panels production is continuously decreasing due categories. The first category [1–8] is based on general concepts of
to advances in the material and PV array fabrication technology, it is grid-connected solar PV systems. The second category [9–34] is on
expected that the solar bulk power generation will be competitive with architecture of grid-connected solar PV system, which is sub classified
other forms of RE sources [3]. However, solar power generation has the into solar cell [11–17], PV array [18–23], MPPT [24–30], and filters
problem of low conversion efficiency of the solar cells, and the output [31–34]. Third category [35–56] includes DC-DC converters which is
power of PV array is dependent on irradiation and temperature. further sub classified into buck [41–43], boost [44–51], buck-boost
Therefore, maximum power point tracking (MPPT) circuitry should [52,53], and cuk [54–56] converters. Fourth category [57–116] is on
be used for utilization of the PV array at full efficiency [4]. inverters used for grid integration of solar PV systems which is further
The solar PV systems have relatively low voltage output character- sub classified in to structure topologies [61–65], single-phase [66–102]
istics and demand high step-up voltage gain for grid integration. This is and three-phase [103–116] inverters. The fifth category [117–128]
achieved by the use of high efficiency DC-DC converters for such includes the control techniques for the grid-connected PV inverters.
practical applications [5]. These converters are able to interface The sixth and final category [129–133] is related to the overall
different level inputs and combine their advantages to feed the different performance and cost estimation of grid connected solar PV systems.
level of outputs for solar PV applications [6]. The inverter converts DC However, some publications include more than one category and have
power to AC power through a solid state switching action used to feed been classified based on their dominant field.

⁎
Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: opmahela@gmail.com (O.P. Mahela), saadgafoor@iitj.ac.in (A.G. Shaik).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.096
Received 7 July 2015; Received in revised form 3 March 2016; Accepted 22 September 2016
1364-0321/ © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
O.P. Mahela, A.G. Shaik Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68 (2017) 316–332

This paper is divided into seven sections. Starting with an intro-

duction in Sections 1, 2 covers the basic architecture of grid-connected
solar PV system, solar cell, PV array, MPPT, and filters. The DC-DC
converters such as buck, boost, buck-boost, and cuk used for the grid-
connected solar PV applications have been demonstrated under the
Section 3. The single and three-phase inverter topologies used for the
grid-connected solar PV applications are presented in Section 4.
Section 5 relates to the control techniques of single and three-phase
inverters. The overall performance of solar PV system, cost estimation Fig. 2. Single-diode equivalent circuit of a solar cell.
and future scope are detailed in the Section 6. Finally, the conclusions
are drawn in the Section 7.
2.2. PV array

The output power from a single PV cell is relatively small. The

2. Grid-connected photovoltaic system required voltage and power is produced by grouping the PV cells in
series and parallel forming the modules. Modules are combined to form
Grid-connected solar PV (GCPV) systems include building inte- PV panels. These panels are connected together to build up the entire
grated PV (BIPV) systems and terrestrial PV (TPV) systems. TPV PV array and any desired current-voltage characteristics could be
systems include plants in desert, tide, and saline-alkali land [9]. The generated [18,19]. Different connection topologies of solar PV array
major elements of a grid-connected solar PV system are shown in are detailed in Fig. 3. These connection topologies of solar PV arrays
Fig. 1. Analysis of optimal photovoltaic (PV) array and inverter sizes for have been utilized in both grid-connected BIPV and TPV systems.
a grid-connected PV system in Saudi Arabia is presented in [10]. The However, the PV inverter topologies may differ depending on the
inverters and DC-DC converters are discussed in separate sections, rooftop area available for the installation of BIPV systems. The grid
whereas all other components are detailed in the following subsec- connected large scale BIPV systems are gaining momentum due the
tions.. introduction of net-metering concept by the utilities for the electricity
users..
The value of Rsh can be assumed to be infinite at short circuit
2.1. Solar cell conditions, where slope of the I-V characteristics is almost zero [15]. In
this case, Iph is equal to the short circuit current (Isc) and Eq. (1) for
Solar cell consists of a p-n junction fabricated in a thin layer of solar cell reduces to the following relation [11]
semiconductor like a p-n diode. Its operational characteristics are also
⎧ ⎡ q (V + I . Rs ) ⎤ ⎫
same as p-n diode and depend on the solar radiations as well as surface I = Isc − I0 ⎨exp ⎢ ⎥ − 1⎬
temperature [11]. An electrical equivalent circuit of a solar cell can be ⎩ ⎣ AkT ⎦ ⎭ (2)
represented by a single or double diode model [12]. Although the
For a PV array arranged in Np parallel and Ns series connected solar
double-diode model is more accurate under certain operating condi-
cells, the Eq. (2) reduces to [17]
tions, the single diode equivalent model has simplicity with sufficient
accuracy [13], and allows for the development of explicit models [14]. ⎧ ⎡ q (V + I (Ns / Np ) Rs ) ⎤ ⎫
I = Np Isc − Np I0 ⎨exp ⎢ ⎥ − 1⎬
Single diode equivalent circuit with parallel and series resistances is ⎩ ⎣ Ns AkT ⎦ ⎭ (3)
shown in Fig. 2..
The relationship between output voltage (V) and output current (I) An extended model of a PV module based on single exponential
for the single-diode equivalent circuit of a solar cell can be described by representation of the PV cell taking into account the ground coupling
the following relation [15,16] effect, leakage inductive and stray capacitive parameters is proposed in
[20]. All parameters of the proposed model are characterized on the
⎧ ⎡ q (V + IRs ) ⎤ ⎫ ⎛ V + IRs ⎞ basis of experimental results obtained in real conditions. Castellano
I = Iph − I0 ⎨exp ⎢ ⎥ − 1⎬ − ⎜ ⎟
⎩ ⎣ AkT ⎦ ⎭ ⎝ Rsh ⎠ (1) et al. [21], proposed a shading model that optimizes the minimization
of distance between the rows of fixed photovoltaic panels. Proposed
where Iph is the PV cell photo-current; I0 is the PV cell saturation method is based on the exact calculation of shadows of panels for
current; A is the curve fitting factor of a solar cell; Rsh is the PV cell different positions of the sun. The shadow depends on the latitude of
shunt resistance; Rs is the PV cell series resistance; q is the electron facility, throughout course of the day and for all planned hours of the
charge (1.602×10−19 C); and k is the Boltzmann constant solar gain. Effects of vortex shedding in arrays of long inclined flat
(1.38×10−23 J/K). An explicit double-diode modelling method based plates and ramifications for ground mounted photovoltaic arrays is
on Lambert W-function for solar cells and PV arrays with bypass diodes presented in [22]. Importance of cleaning concentrated photovoltaic
is proposed by the authors in [12]. Psarros et al. [14], presented single- arrays, in a desert environment, is presented by the authors in [23].
diode model of solar PV cell with negative diode breakdown operation.
Detailed survey on the solar PV cell characteristics and mathematical 2.3. Maximum power point tracking
formulations is presented in [17].
The basic principle of maximum power point tracking (MPPT)
algorithm depends on the exploitation of voltage and current variations
caused due to pulsations of instantaneous power. Analysing these
variations allows us to obtain power gradient and evaluate, if the solar
PV system operates close to the maximum power point [24]. The
maximum power delivered by the solar PV array is given by the relation
Pmax = Vmpp Impp (4)
where Vmpp and Impp are respectively the optimal operating voltage
and current of PV array at the condition of maximum power output.
Fig. 1. Grid-connected solar PV system. The solar cell exhibits non-linear V-I characteristics, therefore a MPPT

317
O.P. Mahela, A.G. Shaik Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68 (2017) 316–332

Fig. 3. Topologies of solar PV array (a) series (b) parallel (c) series-parallel (d) total-cross tied (e) bridge-link, and (f) honey-comb.

controller must track the maximum power and match the current 2.4. Filter
environmental changes [11]. The MPPT is achieved by using DC-DC
converter between PV array and inverter. From the measured voltage A filter consisting of inductance and capacitance is used between
and current, the MPPT algorithm generates the optimal duty ratio (D) inverter and the grid. The filter is designed to reduce higher-order
in order to maintain the electrical quantities at values corresponding to harmonics introduced due to PWM modulation of the DC/AC converter
the maximum power point [17]. The most widely used MPPT techni- [31]. The LCL filter design has inverter side inductance (L i ), the grid
ques include perturbation and observation (P & O), incremental con- side inductance (Lg ) and capacitance (Cf ). The (Lg Cf ) is considered as
ductance, open circuit voltage, short circuit current, Fuzzy logic, and second order low pass filter. The ratio of grid side inductance and
neural network based methods. converter side inductance depends upon the ripple current attenuation
Lian et al. [25] proposed a hybrid MPPT method which combines [32]. The simplified design equations for LCL filter are given as follows
the P & O and particle swarm optimization (PSO) methods with [33]
advantage that search space for the PSO is reduced, and hence, the Vg
time required for convergence can be greatly improved. In [26], Li =
2 6 fs Iripple, peak (5)
authors proposed a single-stage three-phase PV system that features
an enhanced MPPT capability, and an improved energy yield under 0.05
partial shading conditions. A MPPT method based on controlling an Cf =
ωn Zbase (6)
AC/DC converter connected at the PV array output, such that it
behaves as a constant input-power load is proposed in [18]. An one 2
VgLL
dimensional Newton-Raphson method based calculation for evaluation Zbase =
Pn (7)
of MPP of PV array is proposed in [13]. Chaos search theory [27], self-
synchronization error dynamics formulation [11], and ripple correla- where Vg is the grid r.m.s. phase voltage; fs is the inverter switching
tion control [24] based MPPT methods have been reported in frequency; Iripple, peak is the peak value of ripple current; Pn is the
literature. A comparison of multiple MPPT techniques is presented inverter rated power; VgLL is the grid line voltage; ωn is the operating
by authors in [28]. Performance comparison of various MPPT techni- frequency. A single-stage solar inverter using hybrid active filter with
ques applied to a single-phase, single-stage, grid-connected photovol- power quality improvement is proposed in [34]. A control structure
taic systems are presented in [29]. A comparative study of MPPT based on proportional resonant (PR) controller for grid-connected PV
techniques for PV systems available until January 2012, is presented by using LCL filter with zero steady-state error and selective harmonic
authors in [30]. compensation is proposed by authors in [33].
A comparative study of commonly used MPPT algorithms is carried
out based on critical reviews of publications [24–30] and all other 3. DC-DC converter
publications cited in this subsection. The comparison based on
different performance indices is provided in Table 1. A DC-DC converter is a power electronic circuit, which converts
direct current of source from one voltage level to the required voltage

318
O.P. Mahela, A.G. Shaik Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68 (2017) 316–332

Table 1
Comparison of MPPT techniques.

MPPT technique Performance indices

PV array dependency Cost Convergence speed Implementation complexity Efficiency Sensed parameters Analog/ digital

Incremental conductance Independent Low Varies Medium Medium Voltage, current Digital
P&O Independent Low Varies Low Low Voltage, current Both
Fuzzy logic Dependent High Fast High High Varies Digital
Neural network Dependent High Fast High High Varies Digital
Short-circuit current Dependent Low Medium Medium Medium Current Both
Open-circuit voltage Dependent Low Medium Low Low Voltage Both
Current sweep Dependent High Slow High High Voltage, current Digital
DC-link capacitor droop control Independent Low Medium Low Medium Voltage Both

Fig. 4. Block diagram of grid-connected solar PV system. Fig. 5. Basic circuit diagram of buck-converter.

level. DC-DC converter is the heart of MPPT hardware for solar PV [38]. The basic circuit diagram of buck converter is shown in Fig. 5..
applications [35]. The operation of DC-DC converter forms the basis Performance parameters of the buck converter are provided in
for the detection of MPP, according to the proposed global MPPT Table 2, from which it can be depicted that the value of D is in the
control algorithm [18]. Practically, the output voltage of one PV string interval [0,1]. Therefore, a buck converter can not achieve the values
is very low despite the use of MPPT. This requires the use of front end that are near the short circuit current (Isc ) and it operates only with
DC-DC converter to be equipped with a step-up capability for grid Rload > = Rmpp [41]. The I-V characteristic of solar PV with DC-DC buck
connection [36]. Arrangements of DC-DC and DC-AC converters in the converter is provided in the Fig. 6, from which it is seen that buck
block scheme of grid connected PV system are shown in Fig. 4.. converter does not follow points near the short circuit current and the
Many topologies have been reported in literature for DC-DC MPP will be tracked as if it is restricted within operation region. An
converters, which can be classified into two categories: isolated and efficient zero-voltage and current switching full bridge phase-shift
non-isolated topologies. Non-isolated topologies do not have output PWM buck converter for PV cell applications in telecommunication is
transformers and commonly used where the voltage step-up regulation proposed by authors in [42]. Cascaded connection of buck converter for
is low. In grid tied PV applications, isolated topologies are used where grid integration of PV modules is proposed by the authors in [43]..
electrical isolation is preferred for safety reasons [37]. The commonly
used topologies of DC-DC converters in solar PV systems are step-down 3.2. Boost converter
(buck converter), step-up (boost converter), and single unit of step-
down and step-up (buck-boost and cuk converters) [38]. The perfor- DC-DC boost converter is step-up converter and widely used for
mance of each topology can be described by the following parameters integrating the low voltage PV modules to the utility grid. It also
[39]: performs the function of MPPT under the nominal utility conditions
[44]. In boost converter, the voltage is stepped up by increasing the
• Current gain (Ai ) duty cycle. The boost converter has the disadvantage of high voltage
• Voltage gain (Av ) stress across the switching device, higher on state resistance leading to
• Input impedance (Ri ) more conduction losses in the switch, reverse recovery problem of
• Minimum filter capacitance (Cmin ) output diode, losses in the leakage inductance, and parasitic capaci-
• Boundary filter inductance (Lb ) tance [45]. The basic circuit diagram of boost converter is shown in
Fig. 7..
The converters may operate in two distinct modes, continuous Performance parameters of the boost converter are tabulated in
conduction mode (CCM) and discontinuous conduction mode (DCM). Table 2. The boost converter operates only if Rload < = Rmpp . The
The CCM is preferred for solar PV applications [40]. The DC-DC operational and non-operational regions of the boost converter on
converter topologies used for solar PV applications are described in the the I-V characteristics of PV modules are shown in Fig. 8, from which it
following subsections. is seen that boost converter does not follow the points near the open
circuit voltage. Balathandayuthapani et al. [46], presented an analysis
3.1. Buck converter and control of a photovoltaic system interfaced with utility grid with
boost converter to a high-penetration case study. A feed-back feed-
In buck converter, the output voltage magnitude is always lower forward loop based digital control to a PWM boost converter used for
than the input voltage magnitude. Therefore, the buck converter is solar PV systems is proposed in [47]. Dadouche et al. [48], proposed a
widely used in PV applications, such as front end step-down applica- silicon thin-film technology based series and parallel combination of
tions, battery charging, and maximum power point tracker. Buck boost converter to provide an economic alternative way to improve
converter has the disadvantage of generating a lot of electromagnetic photovoltaic system efficiencies for grid integration. Control and
interference noise on account of pulsating source current waveform configuration of a boost converter that allows for high voltage and

319
O.P. Mahela, A.G. Shaik Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68 (2017) 316–332

large scale grid-integration of PV systems is proposed in [49]. Hu et al.

[36], proposed multi-stage hysteresis control of a boost converter in
both CCM and DCM modes for integrating PV systems into a single
phase power grid. In [50], authors proposed a series connection of a
module integrated boost converter output with a PV panel for high
conversion efficiency and low cost PV modules. A PV system using
multilevel boost converter and line commutated inverter, operating in
both grid-connected and stand-alone mode has been proposed by
authors in [51]. Cascaded connection of boost converter for direct
connection of PV systems to the utility grid is proposed by the authors
in [43]. In [39], authors investigated the effects of changing cell
temperature and solar irradiance on the choice and design of different
topologies of DC-DC converters used in PV systems in Egypt..
Fig. 6. Operational and non-operational regions of I-V curve of buck-converter.
3.3. Buck-boost converter

In buck-boost converter, the output voltage magnitude may be

lower or higher than the input voltage magnitude. Buck-boost topology
can be achieved through cascade connection of buck and boost
converters. In buck-boost converter the input current is always
discontinuous [40]. The main disadvantages of this topology are high
input-voltage ripple and high-electrical stresses to the switch [39]. The
basic circuit diagram of the buck-boost converter for solar PV applica-
tions is shown in Fig. 9..
Fig. 10 shows operational and non-operational regions of PV
Fig. 7. Basic circuit diagram of boost-converter.
module on I-V curve for buck-boost converter. The performance
parameters of the buck-boost converter are provided in Table 2, from
which it is depicted that increasing D, decreases the input impedance
thus the PV operating voltage moves to the left region of I-V curve and
that decreasing the D, increases the input impedance thus operating
voltage moves to the right of I-V curve. Buck-boost converter does not
have non-operational region. In [52], authors presented the use of high
efficiency structure of four switch buck-boost converter for PV applica-
tions with advantages that it has few electrical components, output
voltage can be higher or lower than input voltage, and presents non-
inverted output voltage. Dual-mode current-fed semi-quadratic buck-
boost converter for transformer less modular photovoltaic applications
is proposed in [53]. Cascaded connection of buck-boost converter for
grid integration of PV modules is proposed in [43]..

3.4. Cuck converter

Fig. 8. Operational and non-operational regions of I-V curve of boost-converter.

Cuk converter is capable of stepping up or down input voltage like

the Cuk converter are the same as the buck-boost converter shown in
buck-boost converter with reverse polarity through the common
Fig. 10. There is not any non-operational region, so changing the duty
terminal of input voltage. The main difference between Cuk converter
cycle enables to operate the converter through short-circuit current to
and buck-boost converter is the addition of a capacitor and an inductor
the open-circuit voltage of the PV modules. The performance para-
[39]. The basic circuit diagram of the Cuk converter is shown in Fig. 11.
meters of the Cuk converter are tabulated in the Table 2..
Inductor L1 filters the DC input and capacitor C1 is the energy transfer
Darwish et al. [54], proposed a three-phase inverter using Cuk
device. Operational and non-operational regions on the I-V curve for

Table 2
Performance parameters for DC-DC converters.

Converter Performance parameter

Ai =
I0
Av =
V0
Ri =
Vs Lb Cmin
Is Vs Is

Buck 1 D RL (1 − D )
RL
(1 − D )
V0
D D2 2f 8Vr Lf 2

Boost 1−D 1 (1 − D )2RL (1 − D )2 D

V
1−D DRL Vr RL f 0
2f

Buck-boost 1−D 1 (1 − D )2 (1 − D )2 D
V
D 1−D RL RL Vr RL f 0
D2 2f
Cuk 1−D D (1 − D )2 L1 =
(1 − D )
RL ; L2 =
(1 − D )
RL Cmin =
(1 − D )
V0 ; C1 =
D
V
D 1−D RL 2Df 2f 8Vr L2 f 2 Vr RL f 0
D2

Ri: converter input impedance; D: duty cycle; f: switching frequency; RL: load impedance; V0: output voltage; Vr: peak to peak output ripple voltage

320
O.P. Mahela, A.G. Shaik Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68 (2017) 316–332

Table 3
Comparison of DC-DC converters.

Attribute DC-DC Converter

Buck Boost Buck-Boost Cuk

Cost Low Low Medium Medium

Efficiency High Low Low Medium
Input current Non- Non- Pulsating Non-
pulsating pulsating pulsating
Output voltage Non-invert Non-invert Invert Invert
polarity
Switch drive Floated Floated Floated Floated
Fig. 9. Basic circuit diagram of buck-boost converter.

power to AC utility system with reasonable cost. To meet these

requirements, power electronics devices using high frequency switch-
ing with PWM are used [59]. The IEEE 1547 requirements for grid
integration of solar PV inverters is tabulated in Table 5. The grid-
connected PV inverters can be classified based on the type of ac supply,
structure topologies, bridge topologies, multilevel topologies, type of
DC-DC converter etc.

4.1. Structure topologies of grid-connected PV inverters

Grid-connected PV systems have four possible structure topologies

of the inverters: (a) module, (b) string, (c) multi-string, and (d) central
inverter [58]. Structure topologies with the type of supply system are
shown in Fig. 12. The brief description of each topology is outlined in
Fig. 10. Operational and non-operational regions of I-V curve of buck-boost and cuk the following subsections..
converter.

4.1.1. Central inverter

A centralized inverter topology shown in Fig. 12 (a) is based on a
central inverter that interfaced a large PV array to the utility grid. The
array consists of PV modules divided into series connections known as
strings to generate high voltage. These strings are connected in parallel,
through string diodes, to generate high powers of 10–250 kW [61]. In
[62], authors proposed the cascaded H-bridge inverter topology as PV
power conversion solution for large-scale PV power plants of central
inverter topology.

Fig. 11. Basic circuit diagram of cuck converter. 4.1.2. String inverter
Fig. 12 (b) describes the string inverter system, where a single PV
converter with main feature that the energy storage elements such as string is coupled to an inverter. The input voltage may be high enough
inductors and capacitors, can be reduced in order to improve the to avoid voltage amplification. This topology has the minimum losses
reliability, reduce size and total cost. A technique based on Cuk due to which it has the advantage of increased energy yield and
converter for efficiently extracting the maximum output power from enhance the supply reliability [60].
a solar panel under varying meteorological conditions is presented in
[55]. The modelling and control of PV plant based on Cuk converter is 4.1.3. Multi-string inverter
presented in [56]. The multi-string inverter shown in Fig. 12 (c) is the further
A comparative study of DC-DC converters used for solar PV development of the string inverter. In this type of topology, several
applications is carried out based on critical reviews of publications strings are interfaced with their own DC-DC converter to a common
[35–56]. The mathematical formulation of performance parameters DC-AC inverter. Every string can be controlled individually. The
are provided in Table 2, and the comparative study is provided in application area of the multi-string inverter covers PV plants of 3–
Table 3. Typical values of inductance and capacitances used in the 10 kW [63].
design of DC-DC converters are provided in Table 4.
4.1.4. Module inverter
4. Inverter The module integrated inverter system is shown in Fig. 12 (d),
where an AC module consisting of single solar PV panel and its own
An inverter converts the DC power from solar PV array output into inverter is connected to the utility grid. It removes the mismatch losses
50 or 60 Hz AC power. Inverters can be transformer based or high between PV modules, as well as supports optimal adjustment between
frequency switching types. Inverters can be the utility connected, stand the PV module and the inverter. The present topologies use self
alone or a combination of both [57]. The Grid-connected PV config- commutated DC-AC converters [64]. A control design for the module
urations are gaining interest due to consistent growth in the solar integrated PV and converter units under partial shading conditions is
market by 20–25% per annum over the last 20 years [58]. Inverter proposed in [65].
technology is the key to have reliable and safety grid interconnection A comparative study of structure topologies of grid-connected solar
operation of PV systems. It is also required to generate high quality PV inverters is carried out based on critical reviews of publications

321
O.P. Mahela, A.G. Shaik Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68 (2017) 316–332

Table 4
Typical values of inductance and capacitance.

Attribute DC-DC Converter

Buck Boost Buck-Boost Cuk

Inductor (s) 100 μH 200 μH 2 ∥ 100 μH 2100 μH

Input capacitance 2 ∥ 2200 μF 220 μF 2 ∥ 2200 μF 220 μF

Output capacitance 220 μF 2 ∥ 2200 μF 2 ∥ 2200 μF 220 μF

Transfer capacitance – – – 4 ∥ 2200 μF
Fig. 13. Half H-bridge topology.

Table 5 [61–65]. Advantages and disadvantages of each topology are provided

IEEE 1547 requirements for grid connection of PV inverters [60]. in Table 6.

Parameter IEEE 1547 requirement 4.2. Single-phase transformerless inverter topologies

Nominal power 30 kW
Harmonic currents h2-h10: 4.0%; h11-h16: 2.0%; h17-h22: 1.5%; Here, only the transformer less single-phase inverter topologies are
h23-h34: 0.6%; > h35: 0.3% discussed. The important widely used topologies are described in the
Maximum current THD 5.0% following subsections.
DC current injection <0.5% of rated output current
Voltage range for normal 88–110%
operation 4.2.1. Half H-bridge topology
Frequency range for normal 59.3–60.5 Hz Half H-bridge topology of the PV inverter is formed by using two
operation switches and a capacitive divider as shown in the Fig. 13. The middle
point of the capacitive divider is grounded to ensure an almost constant
common mode voltage and prevents leakage current through parasitic
capacitance of the PV modules [66]. This topology has the advantage of
low cost and disadvantage of only two levels in output voltage wave-
form, switches has to support high voltage, the output current is highly
distorted and causes high electromagnetic inference emission [67].
Calais et al. [68], proposed the multilevel half H-bridge inverter
topologies for single-phase grid-connected PV systems and investigated
the issues such as component count and stress, system power rating,
and the influence of the PV array earth resistance. Cascaded five level
half H-bridge topology implemented for grid-connected PV systems
has been proposed in [69]..

4.2.2. Full H-bridge topology

The full H-bridge inverter topology for single-phase grid tied PV
system uses four switches as shown in Fig. 14. Low pass LC filter, dc-
link capacitor, common mode inductor (LCM ), differential mode in-
ductor (LDM ), common mode capacitor (CCM ), and differential mode
inductor (CDM ) are also shown in the figure. Unipolar PWM modulation
is widely used for PV applications and in this technique a high
frequency common mode voltage of Vdc /2 is applied to the PV panels.
However, this technique has the disadvantage of appearance of non-
Fig. 12. Types of grid-tied PV inverters (a) central, (b) string, (c) multi-string, and (d)
negligible leakage current because of the PV panel parasitic capacitance
module inverter.
[70]. To solve the problem of leakage current, the bipolar PWM
modulation has been used [71]..

Table 6
Advantages and disadvantages of structure based topologies of grid-connected solar PV inverters.

Structure topology Advantages Disadvantages

of inverter

Central inverter Use of high voltage and high power applications Use of high voltage DC cables, high power losses due to common MPPTs,
module mismatch, non flexible design, losses in the string diodes,
expensive, failure of central inverter leads to shut down of whole PV plant
String inverter No string diode losses, low cost as compared to central inverter topology, The necessary high voltage-amplification may reduce the overall efficiency
overall higher efficiency, individual MPPTs can be applied for every string and increase the cost per kW of power produced
Multi-string inverter Every string can be controlled separately, allows the integration of strings of The use of both DC-DC and DC-AC converters increases the cost per kW of
different technologies and of various orientations, small DC-link capacitor, this inverter
high energy reveal due to local MPPT and optimum monitoring of the PV
system
Module inverter Low manufacturing and retail costs, minimum power loss, maximum power Reduced overall efficiency, higher amplification, higher installation cost,
extraction from the PV module, easy expanding of the system due to the main challenge for the designers is to develop an inverter that can amplify
modular structure the very small voltage

322
O.P. Mahela, A.G. Shaik Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68 (2017) 316–332

magnitude of free-wheeling path potential above or below the DC link

voltage. The removal of leakage current depends on the turn on speed
of clamping diodes [79]. The unipolar PWM and double frequency
PWM modulation techniques are used in this topology. The main
disadvantage of this topology is high conduction losses due to the
inductor current flowing through four active switches [80]. H6 topology
using MOSFET in place of low effective IGBTs is proposed by the
authors in [81]..

4.2.6. NPC topology

The neutral point clamped (NPC) topology is the single-phase
Fig. 14. Full H-bridge topology.
application of multi-level topology used in the high power motor
drives. The NPC half bridge topology of three-level voltage source
inverter is shown in Fig. 18, and has been reported in [82]. It has one
leg consisting of four switches S1–S4 and two diodes D1–D2 used to
clamp the voltage of middle point. These diodes are known as clamping
diodes used to provide the free-wheeling path to the output current in
the free-wheeling period and results in zero output voltage state [83].
This topology has the advantages of high efficiency, low ripple current,
and minimum leakage current. However, this topology has the
disadvantages of necessity of higher input voltage compared with the
FB topology and requirement of capacitor bank of high capacity [84].
Fig. 15. HERIC topology. Bharatiraja et al. [85], presented the field programmable gate array
based capacitor balancing control scheme of NPC multi-level inverter
4.2.3. HERIC topology for PV system using space vector PWM scheme..
HERIC stands for Highly Efficient and Reliable Inverter Concept
topology. This topology consists of a full-bridge inverter along with AC 4.2.7. Active NPC topology
bypass (FB-ACBP) topology as shown in Fig. 15, and reported in [72]. NPC topology of the inverter is modified by replacing the clamping
In HERIC topology a couple of branches are connected in parallel with diodes with power switches to obtain active neutral point clamped
the output filter and have the advantages of reduced leakage current, a (ANPC) topology as shown in Fig. 19 [86]. The additional switches S5
high efficiency and three-level output voltage by employing unipolar and S6 provide the several different ways to clamp the mid-point
PWM with low-ripple across the output filter [73]. Parallel operation of voltage. The upper clamping path is established by turning on the
HERIC topology based single-phase transformer less grid-tied PV switches S2 and S5, whereas lower clamping path is established by
inverter with common DC bus and AC bus in order to enhance the turning on the switches S3 and S6 [87]. This topology has the
efficiency and reliability of DC module type PV generation systems has advantages of low power loss and high efficiency of converter [88].
been reported in [74]. Low-voltage ride-through capability of HERIC An ANPC topology having inner voltage boosting capability for solar PV
topology based PV inverter under grid faults and grid support services applications has been proposed by the authors in [89]..
of PV systems has been investigated in [75]..
4.2.8. Flying capacitor topology
4.2.4. H5 topology The clamping diodes in NPC topology have been replaced with a
This topology uses one additional DC-bypass switch compared to capacitor to obtain the flying capacitor topology as shown in Fig. 20.
the full-bridge topology as shown in Fig. 16, and reported in [74]. The The capacitor floats with respect to the dc source reference and helps to
switches S1 and S2 are operated at grid-frequency, whereas switches achieve additional levels and voltage clamping [90]. The features of this
S3, S4 and S5 are operated at high frequency. During current free- topology are similar to the diode clamped topology and it provides
wheeling period, switch S5 is open disconnecting the PV panels from redundant switch states that can be used to control the capacitor
inverter full H-bridge [70]. The H5 topology is patented by SMA, which charge even under loads with DC level [68]. This topology has the
is one of the world-wide leading manufactures of PV inverters. It has disadvantages of high voltage due to imbalance may destroy inverter,
the advantages of almost constant common mode voltage, high requirement of special circuit for pre-charging of flying capacitor
efficiency particularly at partial load, and low conduction losses. increases the complexity of control circuit, and requirement of high
However, the conduction losses may increase if the semiconductor number of capacitors for higher levels of topology [64]. However, this
choice is not optimum [76]. In [77], authors presented a design topology has capability of fault tolerant operation with higher number
technique for optimizing the switching frequency and structure of the of levels. This operation allows the inverter to continue working even if
output filter in H5 topology of PV inverter, which employ SiC-type a transistor or a floating capacitor is damaged [91]. Analysis and
power devices. The design results demonstrate the superiority of implementation of an inverter with flying capacitor for photovoltaic ac
optimized SiC-based H5 topology, in terms of energy production, module applications have been reported in [92]..
compared to their non-optimized and silicon (Si)-based counterparts..
4.2.9. Coenergy NPC topology
4.2.5. H6 topology The coenergy topology is an alternative of the NPC topology
H6 topology of PV inverter is derived from H5 topology by adding obtained by using two bidirectional switches S3 and S4 as shown in
an additional switch (S6) as shown in Fig. 17, and reported in [78]. The Fig. 21. This topology is patented by co-energy [63]. The AC switches
clamping branch constitutes a capacitive divider and two diodes that used in this topology are obtained by back to back connecting two
can clamp the common mode voltage to half of the DC input voltage. power devices. In this topology the output voltage clamped to the
Depending on the state of grid voltage in the positive and negative half neutral point using bi-directional switches S3 and S4 to achieve the
cycle periods, the switches S1 and S4 are commutated with line zero voltage state [93]. This topology has the advantages such a
frequency and in anti-parallel to the switches S2 and S3. Diodes D1 configuration relies on lower power losses, as only one power device
and D2 can conduct during the free-wheeling period based on the is turned on at a time during active states [89]. The comparative study

323
O.P. Mahela, A.G. Shaik Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68 (2017) 316–332

Fig. 21. Conergy NPC topology.

Fig. 16. H5 topology.

of co-energy NPC topology and one switch reduced NPC topology has
been reported in [94]..

4.3. Miscellaneous topologies

The advanced versions of basic topologies presented in Sections

4.2.1–4.2.9 have played a significant role in the grid-connected solar
PV applications. Rampinelli et al. [95], presented the mathematical
models that characterize the inverters used in the grid-connected solar
PV systems and their applications in the experimental tests as well as
Fig. 17. H6 inverter topology. computer simulations software. A grid-connected micro-inverter with
phase-shift power modulation, a reduced number of power conversion
stages, and fewer passive components is proposed in [96]. In [97],
authors proposed a design of multilevel H-bridge inverter topology
with increased DC to AC conversion efficiency and battery energy
storage to enable 24/7 operations. A 9 level grid connected inverter
topology to generate high voltage AC using low voltage PV modules has
been proposed in [98]. In [99], authors proposed a 27-level inverter
topology for implementing the static var compensator (SVC) and active
power filters with power injection capability for solar PV applications.
Barbosa et al. [100], proposed a boost current multilevel inverter for
single-phase grid connected solar PV systems. The inverter topologies
such as NPC half-bridge with a capacitor divider, half H-bridge with
generation control circuit, H6-type MOSFET inverter topology, im-
proved H6 topology, high reliable and efficient (HRE) topology, H-
Fig. 18. NPC topology. bridge zero voltage rectifier (HB-ZVR) topology, optimized H5 (oH5)
topology, virtual DC bus topology, multifunctional grid connected
inverter topologies, buck converter, boost converter and buck-boost
converter based topologies for grid connected solar PV applications
have been reported in literature [101,102].
A comparative study of single-phase transformer less inverter
topologies used for the grid integration of solar photovoltaic systems
is carried out based on critical reviews of publications [66–102] and all
other articles cited in the Section 4.2. The comparison of these
topologies is provided in the Table 7. A brief comparison between
NPC, flying capacitor, and cascaded H-bridge single-phase multilevel
inverter (MLI) topologies to investigate the derivation of higher level
topologies from basic inverter topologies is provided in Table 8, .

Fig. 19. Active NPC topology.

4.4. Three-phase inverter topologies

For solar parks, where higher electric power capacity of grid-

connected solar PV systems is installed, three-phase supply systems
are always desired. To integrate such plants with the grid, the three-
phase inverters are preferred due to good performance, suitability for
grid-connection, low harmonics level, and high efficiency [103]. The
three-phase inverter topologies are derived from the single-phase
inverter topologies by using the similar structure in all the three-
phases. To limit the length of paper, only the NPC topology is discussed
in detail. Transformerless three-phase 3-level NPC inverter system for
solar PV applications is shown in Fig. 22. It consists of a PV array, DC/
DC converter, 3-level NPC inverter, LC filter, and utility grid. Each of
the three legs of the inverter consists of four power switches, four free-
Fig. 20. Flying capacitor topology.
wheeling diodes and two clamping diodes. The 3-level NPC topology

324
O.P. Mahela, A.G. Shaik Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68 (2017) 316–332

Table 7
Comparison of single-phase transformerless inverter topologies.

Inverter topology Performance indices Cost

Input Switches Diodes Output voltage Number of Leakage Maximum Transistor Input
capacitors levels MPPTs current efficiency (%) voltage (V) capacitance

Half H-bridge 2 2 0 2 1 Very low – 800 High Low

topology
Full H-bridge 1 4 0 3 1 High – 400 Low Medium
topology
HERIC topology 1 6 2 3 1 Very low – 400 Low High
H5 topology 1 5 0 3 1 Very low 98.5 400 Low High
H6 topology 2 6 2 3 1 Very low 97.4 600 High High
NPC topology 2 4 2 3 1 Very low 98.16 400 High Medium
Active NPC 2 6 0 3 1 Very low 97.34 400 High High
topology
Flying capacitor 3 4 0 3 1 Very low – 400 High Medium
topology
Conergy NPC 2 4 0 3 1 Very low 97.67 400 High Medium
topology

can produce five voltage levels on the utility grid: Vdc, +Vdc /2 , 0, −Vdc /2 , control with combined vector and bipolar operation. Ghoddami et al.
and −Vdc depending on the switching frequency [104].. [26], proposed a single-stage three-phase PV system using voltage
The synchronized pulse width modulation (PWM) for control of source converter that features enhanced MPPT capability, and an
dual NPC has 27 different switching states for the switching of 12 improved energy yield under partial shading conditions. A design of
switches of the inverter [85]. The switching states correspond to three-phase transformerless grid connected Quasi Z-source inverter
nineteen vectors shown by the large and small arrows shown in with minimal leakage current for solar PV applications is reported in
Fig. 23. Each of the two hexagons represent six switching states, and [111]. Chen et al. [112], proposed a high efficiency three-phase grid-
six small vectors have position in the middle of the corresponding large connected module integrated converter with two-stage zero-voltage
vectors. Three different switching states can be defined by the ternary switching and verified through experimental results. Generating me-
switching variables (+,0,−) for the switches of each of the three phase chanism of circulating currents for each phase and each converter is
as given below [105]: . proposed by the authors in [113]. Darwish et al. [54], proposed a three-
phase inverter based on Cuk converter for solar PV applications. This
+ if S1, S2 are ON and S3, S4 are OFF topology has the reduced number of the energy storage elements, such
0 if S2, S3 are ON and S1, S4 are OFF as inductors and capacitors in order to improve the reliability, reduced
− if S3, S4 are ON and S1, S2 are OFF size and total cost. A comparative study of the FC, NPC, and cascaded
H-bridge multi-level three-phase inverter topologies for solar PV
. applications is presented in [114]. A three-phase modular cascaded
The use of only seven vectors V1-V7, can provide the elimination of H-bridge multilevel inverter for grid-connected solar PV system with
common mode voltages. Switching state sequences for these vectors improved efficiency and current balanced has been proposed by the
can be given as: V1 (+0 − ); V2 (0 + −); V3 (−+0); V4 (−0 + ); authors in [115]. In [116], authors investigated the comparison of
V5 (0 − +); V6 (+−0); V7 (000) . A space vector PWM technique for efficiency, leakage current, and mechanical volume for the voltage
the control of three-phase grid connected inverter based radial basis source inverter, three-level NPC inverter, and the Z-source inverter
function (RBF) neural network is presented by the authors in [106]. topologies of three-phase grid-connected solar PV systems. A control
This technique uses eight switching states. Deadbeat decoupling scheme of the three-phase modular cascaded H-bridge multilevel
control strategy according to the characteristics of three-phase photo- inverter for a grid-connected PV systems has been presented in
voltaic grid-connected inverters is proposed by the authors in [107]. [115]. The topologies and control strategies of multi-functional grid-
The three-level-stacked NPC structure having the advantages such connected inverters have been reported in [101].
as a double switching frequency, and parallel load paths with the
analysis of power loss distribution is proposed by the authors in [87]. 5. Control techniques for grid-connected solar PV inverters
Chen et al. [108], presented the one cycle control method and PWM
method for a three-phase boost-type grid-connected inverter. Analysis The control of a grid-connected photovoltaic system can be divided
of the monopolar three-phase grid-connected current source inverter into two important parts: (1) MPPT controller to extract the maximum
has been reported in [109]. In [110], authors presented the study on power from the PV modules, and (2) Inverter controller, which ensures
current sharing and circulating current among paralleled inverter the control of active and reactive powers injected into the utility grid
modules and proposed a parallel operation method based on one cycle and the control of DC-link voltage. The MPPT control has been

Table 8
Comparison between single-phase MLI topologies.

Type of topology Switches Diodes Capacitor Source Balancing capacitors Voltage unbalancing Cost Applications

Diode clamped 2(n − 1) (n2 − 1) (n − 1) 1 0 Average Low Motor drive system, STATCOM, PV
2 2
Flying capacitor 2(n − 1) 2(n − 1) (n − 1)2 1 (n − 1)(n − 2) High High Motor drive system, STATCOM, PV
4 2
Cascaded H-bridge 2(n − 1) 2(n − 1) (n − 1) (n − 1) 0 Very small Highest Motor drive system, PV, fuel cell, battery system
2 2

n: number of levels in the MLI

325
O.P. Mahela, A.G. Shaik Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68 (2017) 316–332

Fig. 22. Transformerless three-phase 3-level NPC inverter system.

The abc control structure with PI controller [118], dead-beat controller

[107], proportional resonant controller [119], and hysteresis controller
(HC) [120] have been reported in literature..

5.1.2. αβ -control
In this control technique, the grid currents are transformed into a
stationary reference frame using abc to αβ transformation as shown in
Fig. 25. This controller has the advantages of very high current gain
around the resonant frequency, high dynamic characteristics, and
minimum steady-state error between the controlled signal and its
reference [121]. High dynamic characteristics of the proportional
resonant controller have been reported in different works [120].

5.1.3. dq-control
The grid voltage and currents are transformed into a rotating
reference system with the grid voltage, using the abc − dq transforma-
Fig. 23. Switching state vectors of three-phase grid-connected 3-level NPC inverter. tion in the synchronous reference frame. This transformation is used to
decouple the ac current into active (Id) and reactive (Iq) power
discussed in the Section 2. The inverter control for both the single- components. These current components are regulated to minimize
phase and three-phase grid-connected inverters has been described in the error between the reference and measured values of active and
this section. reactive powers [122]. The structure of this control strategy is shown in
the Fig. 26. The d − q control technique for three-phase grid-connected
5.1. Three-phase inverters PV inverters employed using synchronous PI controller [123], and
combination of Fuzzy logic with PID controller [124] have been
PWM strategy based on two cascaded control loops is employed for reported in literature..
the control of three-phase grid connected PV systems. The outer A comparative study of control techniques for three-phase grid-tied
voltage control loop is used to settle the PV array at the MPP [112]. solar PV inverters has been carried out based on critical reviews of
The inner current control loop is used to establish the duty ratio for the publications [117–124] and all other publications cited in this sub-
generation of a sinusoidal output current, which is in phase with the section. The advantages and disadvantages of each of the investigated
grid voltage. The controllers such as proportional-integral (PI), hyster- control strategy are tabulated in Table 9.
esis, proportional-resonant (PR), deadbeat are commonly used, which
provide satisfactory operation near the equilibrium point [110,117]. 5.2. Single-phase inverters
The commonly used control techniques for grid-tied three-phase
inverters are briefly detailed in the following subsections. The control structures for single-phase grid-connected inverters are
mainly categorized into three categories: (1) control structure for
5.1.1. abc-control single-phase inverter with DC-DC converter, (2) control structure for
In the abc control of the grid-tied PV inverter, an individual single-phase inverter without DC-DC converter, and (3) control
controller for each grid current is used as shown in Fig. 24. In the structure based on power control shifting phase (PCSP) [59].
structure of abc controller non-linear controllers like hysteresis and Hassaine et al. [125], proposed a digital control strategy based on
deadbeat controllers are preferred due to their high dynamics [106]. phase shifting of the inverter output voltage with respect to the grid

Fig. 24. Block diagram of abc control strategy.

326
O.P. Mahela, A.G. Shaik Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68 (2017) 316–332

Fig. 25. Block diagram of αβ -Control strategy.

Fig. 26. Block diagram of dq control strategy.

Table 9
Advantages and disadvantages of control techniques for three-phase grid-connected solar PV inverters.

Control technique Type of controller Advantages Disadvantages

abc-Control PI Simple in design and easy in implementation Transfer function is complex

PR Transfer function is simple More complex than dead-beat and hysteresis
Hysteresis Rapid development, high dynamic More complex than dead-beat and hysteresis
Dead-beat Rapid development, high dynamic, simple control for current Implementation in high frequency micro-controller
regulation

αβ -Control PR The steady-state error is eliminated, high dynamic, very high gain Complex hardware circuit, no full control of power factor
is achieved around the resonant frequency
dq0-Control PI Simplicity, controlling and filtering can be easily achieved The steady-state error is not eliminated, very poor compensation
capability of the low-order harmonics

voltage, in order to control the power factor for a wide range of the be evaluated in terms of three parameters such as final PV system yield,
inverter output current. In [126], authors proposed an input output reference yield, and performance ratio [129]. The final PV system yield
feedback linearisation control technique for control structure of single- Yf has been widely used for the evaluation of PV system performance. It
phase inverter without DC-DC converter. A digital control strategy is defined as the net energy output E divided by the rated d.c. output
based on the phase shift between the inverter output voltage and the power P0 of the installed PV array. It represents the number of hours
grid voltage, and the digital sinusoidal pulse width modulation that the PV array would need to operate at its rated power to provide
(DSPWM) has been proposed by the authors in [127]. Hysteresis the same energy. The mathematical relation for the same is given by the
PWM based control technique for the control of single-phase inverter relation in terms of kW h/kW.
without DC-DC converter has been proposed by the authors in [128]. E
A comparative study of control techniques for single-phase grid-tied Yf =
P0 (8)
solar PV inverters has been carried out based on critical reviews of
publications [125–128] and [59]. The advantages and disadvantages of Performance of grid connected PV systems operated by the Arizona
each of the investigated control strategy are tabulated in Table 10. Public Service Company has been detailed in the Table 11 in terms of
Yf values for a 12-month period. Moore et al. [130] presented the study
of performance of grid connected solar PV systems for a period of 5
6. Performance of grid-connected solar PV system and future
years. A comparative study on different photovoltaic array topologies
scope
under partial shading conditions has been reported in [131].

This section details the overall performance of grid-connected solar

6.2. Future cost estimation of PV system
PV system, approximate cost estimation upto the year 2050 and future
scope of research in the field of grid connected solar PV systems.
The price of PV modules has decreased substantially over the past
30 years. The price of PV inverters has also followed a similar price
6.1. Performance of grid-connected solar PV system trend as that of PV modules. Installation costs have decreased at
different rates depending on the maturity of the market and type of
As per IEC standard 61724 the overall PV system performance may application. However, the prices for some of the elements of PV

327
O.P. Mahela, A.G. Shaik Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68 (2017) 316–332

Table 10
Advantages and disadvantages of control techniques for grid-connected single-phase
solar PV inverters.

Topology Advantages Disadvantages

Topology with Fast dynamic response, Complex hardware circuit,

DC/DC instantaneous current control partial control of power
converter factor
Topology without Fast dynamic response, Complex hardware circuit,
DC/DC instantaneous current control, partial control of power
converter simple conversion system factor
Topology with Simple digital circuit, less Partial control of current,
PCSP circuit requirement, fast slow dynamic response
reactive power control

Table 11
Performance of arizona public service PV systems.

System name Type of system Location Rated DC power Yf

(P0) kW

Embry riddle Single-axis Prescott 228.50 1906

tracking
Gilbert Nature Single-axis Tempe 144.00 1682
tracking
Ocotillo 1 Single-axis Tempe 94.47 1806 Fig. 27. Evolution of prices of large PV systems (€/kW ).
tracking
Airport MTA7 Single-axis Prescott 151.20 1882
tracking
Water Tanks- Single-axis Scottsdale 153.60 1986
East tracking the topic of grid-connected PV system used to integrate the solar
Yucca Pwr. Plant Single-axis Yuma 121.00 2147 energy into the utility grid. The detailed study on the components of
tracking solar PV system such as solar cell, PV array, MPPT and filters is
Star Parking Non-tracking Tempe 5.04 1345
presented. Different types of DC-DC converters used to increase the
Challenger Non-tracking Peoria 2.28 1593
Desert Non-tracking Lake pleasant 2.28 1461 output voltage characteristics of the solar PV are analysed critically and
their comparative study is presented. Topologies of single-phase grid-
connected inverters have also been analysed critically and comparative
systems have not decreased with the same pace. Performance and study of these topologies is presented. The three-phase grid-connected
economic analysis of power electronic devices used in the solar PV inverters have also been outlined. The control techniques for the single
systems have been reported in [132]. A detailed study to provide a and three-phase grid-connected inverters are critically reviewed and
description of the current status of developing solar PV power presented. Finally, at the end of paper overall performance of PV
generation worldwide, and also of its untapped potentials and growth systems, cost estimation and future scope for further research in the
prospects in the coming years has been provided in [133]. An field of grid-integration of solar energy have been presented.
approximate estimation of the overall cost of the solar PV systems in According to the developed review, it can be concluded that grid-
terms of per kW power generation has been provided in the Fig. 27. connected solar PV system has been used to convert the sunlight into
The x-axis represent the years and y-axis represent the cost of solar PV electricity and integrate the same to the utility grid. The major
systems in €/ kW . The accelerated scenario estimates the costs slightly components of the system are solar cell, PV array, MPPT, filters, DC-
higher than the paradigm shift scenario. It is estimated that the cost of DC converter, inverter, control techniques for the DC-DC converters
solar PV systems would decrease approximately by 75% in the year and inverters. Perturbation and observation (P & O), incremental
2050. conductance, open circuit voltage, short circuit current, Fuzzy logic,
and neural network based methods are the most widely used MPPT
6.3. Future scope of research techniques. The commonly used DC-DC converters for the grid-
connected solar PV system are buck, boost, buck-boost, and cuk. The
The present thrust is to increase penetration level of RE sources boost converter has wide application, as the PV has low output voltage
into the utility grid to meet the future energy demand. The uncertain characteristics and the grid voltage are generally high. The most
nature of these sources are emerging as the main headache for the commonly used topologies of single-phase grid-connected inverters
utility in terms of reliability, system stability and system security. are half H-bridge, full H-bridge, HERIC, H5, H6, NPC, active NPC,
Therefore, there is need to investigate into the power electronics flying capacitor, and conergy NPC. The commonly used control
converters for integration of solar energy into the utility grid, with techniques for single-phase inverters are the techniques for topology
minimum harmonic injection and to meet out the requirement of grid with DC/DC converter, without DC/DC converter topology, and with
codes specified by the utility operators. Presently the efficiency of the PCSP. The control techniques used for the control of three-phase
solar PV array is also low, therefore it is also needed to investigate into inverters are abc-Control, αβ -Control, and dq0-Control. A comparative
the material for fabrication of the PV panels which has maximum study presented will help the users in selecting the particular topology
energy conversion efficiency. and control techniques of the constituent components of the grid-
connected PV system that suit for the plant according to the capacity,
7. Conclusion location and requirement for grid connection. The overall performance
of the grid-connected solar PV system will increase in the near future
A comprehensive literature review of the grid-connected photo- and cost will be reduced. It is hoped that this review will be beneficial to
voltaic systems is carried out. This paper presents a detailed survey on the users, designers, manufacturers, researchers, and engineers work-

328
O.P. Mahela, A.G. Shaik Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68 (2017) 316–332

ing in the field of solar energy for increasing the harnessing of solar from the transient charge of an external capacitor. IEEE J Photovolt
2013;3(4):1325–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2271191.
energy and its grid integration. [21] Castellano NN, Parra JAG, Valls-Guirado J, Manzano-Agugliaro F. Optimal
displacement of photovoltaic arrays rows using a novel shading model. Appl
References Energy 2015;144(0):1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.060,
[URL 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261915000847〉].
[22] Strobel K, Banks D. Effects of vortex shedding in arrays of long inclined flat plates
[1] Tsengenes G, Adamidis G. Investigation of the behavior of a three phase grid- and ramifications for ground-mounted photovoltaic arrays. J Wind Eng Ind
connected photovoltaic system to control active and reactive power. Electr Power Aerodyn 2014;133(0):146–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2014.06.013,
Syst Res 2011;81(1):177–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2010.08.008, [URL 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610514001202〉].
[URL 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378779610002075〉]. [23] Khonkar H, Alyahya A, Aljuwaied M, Halawani M, Saferan AA, Al-khaldi F, et al.
[2] Libo W, Zhengming Z, Jianzheng L. A single-stage three-phase grid-connected Importance of cleaning concentrated photovoltaic arrays in a desert environment.
photovoltaic system with modified mppt method and reactive power compensa- Sol Energy 2014;110(0):268–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sol-
tion. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 2007;22(4):881–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ ener.2014.08.001, [URL 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/
TEC.2007.895461. S0038092×14003776〉].
[3] Mancilla-David F, Arancibia A, Riganti-Fulginei F, Muljadi E, Cerroni M. A [24] Casadei D, Grandi G, Rossi C. Single-phase single-stage photovoltaic generation
maximum power point tracker variable-dc-link three-phase inverter for grid- system based on a ripple correlation control maximum power point tracking. IEEE
connected pv panels. In: Proceedings of the 2012 3rd IEEE PES International Trans Energy Convers 2006;21(2):562–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/
Conference and Exhibition on Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT Europe), TEC.2005.853784.
2012, p. 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISGTEurope.2012.6465892. [25] Lian K, Jhang J, Tian I. A maximum power point tracking method based on
[4] Zhou T, Sun W. Study on maximum power point tracking of photovoltaic array in perturb-and-observe combined with particle swarm optimization. IEEE J
irregular shadow. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2015;66(0):227–34. http:// Photovolt 2014;4(2):626–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.10.030, [URL 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/ JPHOTOV.2013.2297513.
science/article/pii/S0142061514006334〉]. [26] Ghoddami H, Yazdani A. A single-stage three-phase photovoltaic system with
[5] Al-Saffar MA, Ismail EH. A high voltage ratio and low stress dcdc converter with enhanced maximum power point tracking capability and increased power rating.
reduced input current ripple for fuel cell source. Renewable Energy 82. In: IEEE Trans Power Deliv 2011;26(2):1017–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/
Proceedings of the International Conference on Renewable Energy: Generation TPWRD.2010.2055896.
and Applications (ICREGA 2014). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.08. [27] Zhou L, Chen Y, Guo K, Jia F. New approach for mppt control of photovoltaic
020. URL 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ system with mutative-scale dual-carrier chaotic search. IEEE Trans Power
S0960148114004790〉; 2015. p.35–43 Electron 2011;26(4):1038–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2010.2078519.
[6] Rehman Z, Al-Bahadly I, Mukhopadhyay S. Multiinput dcdc converters in [28] Romero-Cadaval E, Spagnuolo G, Garcia Franquelo L, Ramos-Paja C, Suntio T,
renewable energy applications an overview. Renew Sustain Energy Rev Xiao W. Grid-connected photovoltaic generation plants: components and opera-
2015;41(0):521–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.033, [URL 〈http:// tion. IEEE Ind Electron Mag 2013;7(3):6–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032114007096〉]. MIE.2013.2264540.
[7] Engel S, Rigbers K, De Doncker R. Digital repetitive control of a three-phase flat- [29] Jain S, Agarwal V. Comparison of the performance of maximum power point
top-modulated grid tie solar inverter. In: Proceedings of the 13th European tracking schemes applied to single-stage grid-connected photovoltaic systems.
Conference on Power Electronics and Applications 2009. EPE ’09; 2009, p. 1–10. Electr Power Appl IET 2007;1(5):753–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/iet-
[8] Ajala O, Sauer P. Stochastic processes in a grid-connected three-phase photo- epa:20060475.
voltaic system. In: Power and Energy Conference at Illinois (PECI), 2014; 2014, p. [30] Subudhi B, Pradhan R. A comparative study on maximum power point tracking
1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PECI.2014.6804543. techniques for photovoltaic power systems. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy
[9] Widn J, Wckelgrd E, Paatero J, Lund P. Impacts of distributed photovoltaics on 2013;4(1):89–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2012.2202294.
network voltages: stochastic simulations of three swedish low-voltage distribution [31] Zanasi R, Cuoghi S. Power control of grid-connected photovoltaic systems. In:
grids. Electr Power Syst Res 2010;80(12):1562–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics
j.epsr.2010.07.007, [URL 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ (ISIE); 2011, p. 1100–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISIE.2011.5984313.
S0378779610001707〉]. [32] Tripathi RN, Singh A, Hanamoto T. Design and control of {LCL} filter interfaced
[10] Ramli MA, Hiendro A, Sedraoui K, Twaha S. Optimal sizing of grid-connected grid connected solar photovoltaic (spv) system using power balance theory. Int J
photovoltaic energy system in saudi arabia. Renew Energy 2015;75(0):489–95. Electr Power Energy Syst 2015;69(0):264–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.028, [URL 〈http://www. j.ijepes.2015.01.018, [URL 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148114006557〉]. S014206151500037X〉].
[11] Kuo C-L, Lin C-H, Yau H-T, Chen J-L. Using self-synchronization error dynamics [33] Zue A, Chandra A. Simulation and stability analysis of a 100 kw grid connected lcl
formulation based controller for maximum photovoltaic power tracking in micro- photovoltaic inverter for industry. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Power Engineering
grid systems. IEEE J Emerg Sel Top Circuits Syst 2013;3(3):459–67. http:// Society General Meeting, 2006; 2006, p. 6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PES.2006.
dx.doi.org/10.1109/JETCAS.2013.2272839. 1709455.
[12] xian Lun S, Wang S, hong Yang G, ting Guo T. A new explicit double-diode [34] Mariappan B, Fernandes B, Ramamoorty M. A novel single-stage solar inverter
modeling method based on lambert w-function for photovoltaic arrays. Sol Energy using hybrid active filter with power quality improvement. In: Proceedings of the
2015;116(0):69–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.03.043, [URL 40th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, IECON 2014 ;
〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038092×1500170X〉]. 2014, p. 5443–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IECON.2014.7049332.
[13] Uoya M, Koizumi H. A calculation method of photovoltaic array's operating point [35] Gaikwad D, Chavan M, Gaikwad M. Hardware implementation of dc-dc converter
for mppt evaluation based on one-dimensional newton raphson method. IEEE for mppt in pv applications. In: Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Global Conference
Trans Ind Appl 2015;51(1):567–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ on Wireless Computing and Networking (GCWCN; 2014, p. 16–20. http://dx.doi.
TIA.2014.2326083. org/10.1109/GCWCN.2014.7030839.
[14] Psarros G, Batzelis E, Papathanassiou S. Partial shading analysis of multistring pv [36] Hu Y, Cao W, Ji B, Si J, Chen X. New multi-stage dcdc converters for grid-
arrays and derivation of simplified mpp expressions. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy connected photovoltaic systems. Renew Energy 2015;74(0):247–54. http://
2015;6(2):499–508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2015.2389715. dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.08.009, [URL 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/
[15] Ding K, Bian X, Liu H, Peng T. A matlab-simulink-based pv module model and its science/article/pii/S0960148114004686〉].
application under conditions of nonuniform irradiance. IEEE Trans Energy [37] Zeng J, Qiao W, Qu L. A single-switch isolated dc-dc converter for photovoltaic
Convers 2012;27(4):864–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TEC.2012.2216529. systems. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition
[16] Eldahab YEA, Saad NH, Zekry A. Enhancing the maximum power point tracking (ECCE), 2012; 2012, p. 3446–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ECCE.2012.
techniques for photovoltaic systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 6342495.
2014;40(0):505–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.202, [URL 〈http:// [38] veerachary M. Fourth-order buck converter for maximum power point tracking
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032114006625〉]. applications. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst 2011;47(2):896–911. http://
[17] Bendib B, Belmili H, Krim F. A survey of the most used {MPPT} methods: con- dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAES.2011.5751233.
ventional and advanced algorithms applied for photovoltaic systems. Renew [39] Farahat M, Metwally H, Mohamed AA-E. Optimal choice and design of different
Sustain Energy Rev 2015;45(0):637–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ topologies of dcdc converter used in {PV} systems, at different climatic conditions
j.rser.2015.02.009, [URL 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ in egypt. Renew Energy 2012;43(0):393–402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.re-
S1364032115000970〉]. nene.2011.10.021, [URL 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/
[18] Koutroulis E, Blaabjerg F. A new technique for tracking the global maximum S0960148111005970〉].
power point of pv arrays operating under partial-shading conditions. IEEE J [40] Durn E, Andjar J, Segura F, Barragn A. A high-flexibility {DC} load for fuel cell
Photovolt 2012;2(2):184–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ and solar arrays power sources based on dcdc converters. Appl Energy
JPHOTOV.2012.2183578. 2011;88(5):1690–702. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.11.002, [URL
[19] Manna DL, Vigni VL, Sanseverino ER, Dio VD, Romano P. Reconfigurable 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261910004654〉].
electrical interconnection strategies for photovoltaic arrays: a review. Renew [41] Taghvaee M, Radzi M, Moosavain S, Hizam H, Marhaban MH. A current and
Sustain Energy Rev 2014;33(0):412–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ future study on non-isolated dcdc converters for photovoltaic applications. Renew
j.rser.2014.01.070, [URL 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ Sustain Energy Rev 2013;17(0):216–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
S1364032114000926〉]. j.rser.2012.09.023, [URL 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/
[20] Spertino F, Sumaili J, Andrei H, Chicco G. Pv module parameter characterization S1364032112005242〉].

329
O.P. Mahela, A.G. Shaik Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68 (2017) 316–332

[42] Saha S, El Chaar L, Lamont L. Efficient zv-zcs phase shift pwm dc-dc converter [63] Islam M, Mekhilef S, Hasan M. Single phase transformerless inverter topologies
interfaced with pv cell for telecommunication applications. In: Energy Conference for grid-tied photovoltaic system: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev
and Exhibition (EnergyCon), 2010 IEEE International, 2010, p. 490–4. http://dx. 2015;45(0):69–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.009, [URL 〈http://
doi.org/10.1109/ENERGYCON.2010.5771731. www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032115000192〉].
[43] Walker G, Sernia P. Cascaded dc-dc converter connection of photovoltaic modules. [64] Latran MB, Teke A. Investigation of multilevel multifunctional grid connected
IEEE Trans Power Electron 2004;19(4):1130–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ inverter topologies and control strategies used in photovoltaic systems. Renew
TPEL.2004.830090. Sustain Energy Rev 2015;42(0):361–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
[44] Jou H-L, Chang Y-H, Wu J-C, Wu K-D. Operation strategy for a lab-scale grid- j.rser.2014.10.030, [URL 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/
connected photovoltaic generation system integrated with battery energy storage. S1364032114008478〉].
Energy Convers Manag 2015;89(0):197–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.en- [65] Chong B, Zhang L. Controller design for integrated pv converter modules under
conman.2014.09.069, [URL 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ partial shading conditions. Sol Energy 2013;92(0):123–38. http://dx.doi.org/
S019689041400870X〉]. 10.1016/j.solener.2013.01.025, [URL 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/
[45] Das M, Agarwal V. A novel, high efficiency, high gain, front end dc-dc converter for article/pii/S0038092×1300042X〉].
low input voltage solar photovoltaic applications. In: Proceedings of the IECON [66] Shen C-L, Peng S-T. A half-bridge pv system with bi-direction power flow
2012 - 38th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society; 2012, p. controlling and power quality improvement. In: Proceedings of the 7th
5744–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IECON.2012.6389046. International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems, 2007. PEDS
[46] Balathandayuthapani S, Edrington C, Henry S, Cao J. Analysis and control of a ’07; 2007, p. 725–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PEDS.2007.4487783.
photovoltaic system: application to a high-penetration case study. IEEE Syst J [67] Patrao I, Figueres E, Gonzlez-Espn F, Garcer G. Transformerless topologies for
2012;6(2):213–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2011.2162889. grid-connected single-phase photovoltaic inverters. Renew Sustain Energy Rev
[47] Tanouti J, Setti M, Aziz A, Aziz E. Application of feedback-feedforward loop digital 2011;15(7):3423–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.03.034, [URL
control to a pwm dc-dc boost converter used for solar photovoltaic systems. In: 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032111001936〉].
Proceedings of the 2014 internationalrenewable and sustainable energy confer- [68] Calais M, Agelidis V. Multilevel converters for single-phase grid connected
ence (IRSEC); 2014, p. 747–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IRSEC.2014.7059741. photovoltaic systems-an overview. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international
[48] Dadouche F, Bthoux O, Kleider J-P. New silicon thin-film technology associated symposium on industrial electronics, 1998. ISIE ’98;1998, vol.1, p. 224–9. http://
with original dcdc converter: an economic alternative way to improve photovoltaic dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISIE.1998.707781.
systems efficiencies. Energy 2011;36(3):1749–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ [69] Xue Y, Manjrekar M. A new class of single-phase multilevel inverters. In:
j.energy.2010.12.054, [URL 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ Proceedings of the 2010 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Power Electronics
S0360544210007607〉]. for Distributed Generation Systems (PEDG); 2010, p. 565–71. http://dx.doi.org/
[49] Moonem M, Krishnaswami H. Control and configuration of three-level dual-active 10.1109/PEDG.2010.5545742.
bridge dc-dc converter as a front-end interface for photovoltaic system. In: [70] Li W, Gu Y, Luo H, Cui W, He X, Xia C. Topology review and derivation
Proceedings of the 2014 twenty-ninth annual IEEE applied power electronics methodology of single-phase transformerless photovoltaic inverters for leakage
conference and exposition (APEC); 2014, p. 3017–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ current suppression. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2015;62(7):4537–51. http://
APEC.2014.6803734. dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2015.2399278.
[50] sung Kim H, Kim J-H, Min B-D, Yoo D-W, Kim H-J. A highly efficient {PV} system [71] Boonmee C, Kumsuwan Y. A phase-shifted carrier-based pwm technique for
using a series connection of dcdc converter output with a photovoltaic panel. cascaded h-bridge inverters application in standalone pv system. In: Proceedings
Renew Energy 2009;34(11):2432–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.re- of the 2012 15th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference
nene.2009.01.011, [URL 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ (EPE/PEMC); 2012, p. LS8c.3-1–LS8c.3-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/
S0960148109000500〉]. EPEPEMC.2012.6397528.
[51] Krithiga S, Gounden NA. Investigations of an improved {PV} system topology [72] Yang Y, Blaabjerg F, Wang H. Low-voltage ride-through of single-phase trans-
using multilevel boost converter and line commutated inverter with solutions to formerless photovoltaic inverters. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 2014;50(3):1942–52.
grid issues. Simul Model Pract Theory 2014;42(0):147–59. http://dx.doi.org/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2013.2282966.
10.1016/j.simpat.2013.12.014, [URL 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ [73] Dzung PQ, Dat DN, Anh NB, Hiep LC, Lee H-H. Design of heric inverter for pv
article/pii/S1569190×13001949〉]. systems by using hardware in the loop (hil) concept. In: Proceedings of the 2014
[52] Orellana M, Petibon S, Estibals B, Alonso C. Four switch buck-boost converter for IEEE 9th Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA); 2014, p.
photovoltaic dc-dc power applications. In: Proceedings of the IECON 2010 - 36th 2035–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICIEA.2014.6931504.
annual conference on IEEE industrial electronics society; 2010, p. 469–74. http:// [74] Zhang L, Sun K, Xing Y, Zhao J. Parallel operation of modular single-phase
dx.doi.org/10.1109/IECON.2010.5674983. transformerless grid-tied pv inverters with common dc bus and ac bus. IEEE J
[53] Nousiainen L, Suntio T. Dual-mode current-fed semi-quadratic buck-boost Emerg Sel Top Power Electron 2015;3(4):858–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/
converter for transformerless modular photovoltaic applications. In: Proceedings JESTPE.2015.2417196.
of the 2011-14th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications [75] Yang Y, Blaabjerg F, Wang H. Low voltage ride-through of single-phase trans-
(EPE 2011); 2011, p. 1–10. formerless photovoltaic inverters. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Energy Conversion
[54] Darwish A, Holliday D, Ahmed S, Massoud A, Williams B. A single-stage three- Congress and Exposition (ECCE), 2013; 2013, p. 4762–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.
phase inverter based on cuk converters for pv applications. IEEE J Emerg Sel Top 1109/ECCE.2013.6647340.
Power Electron 2014;2(4):797–807. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ [76] Xiao H, Xie S, Chen Y, Huang R. An optimized transformerless photovoltaic grid-
JESTPE.2014.2313185. connected inverter. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2011;58(5):1887–95. http://
[55] Chung H-H, Tse K, Hui S, Mok C, Ho M. A novel maximum power point tracking dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2010.2054056.
technique for solar panels using a sepic or cuk converter. IEEE Trans Power [77] Saridakis S, Koutroulis E, Blaabjerg F. Optimization of sic-based h5 and conergy-
Electron 2003;18(3):717–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2003.810841. npc transformerless pv inverters. IEEE J Emerg Sel Top Power Electron
[56] Hamadi A, Rahmani S, Al-Haddad K, Al-Turki Y. A three-phase three wire grid- 2015;3(2):555–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JESTPE.2014.2332253.
connect photovoltaic energy source with sepic converter to track the maximum [78] Gonzalez R, Lopez J, Sanchis P, Marroyo L. Transformerless inverter for single-
power point. In: Proceedings of the IECON 2011 - 37th Annual Conference on phase photovoltaic systems. IEEE Trans Power Electron 2007;22(2):693–7.
IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 2011, p. 3087–92. http://dx.doi.org/10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2007.892120.
1109/IECON.2011.6119803. [79] Zhang L, Sun K, Xing Y, Xing M. H6 transformerless full-bridge pv grid-tied
[57] Chinnaiyan VK, Jerome J, Karpagam J. An experimental investigation on a inverters. IEEE Trans Power Electron 2014;29(3):1229–38. http://dx.doi.org/
multilevel inverter for solar energy applications. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 10.1109/TPEL.2013.2260178.
2013;47(0):157–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.10.025, [URL [80] Islam M, Mekhilef S. H6-type transformerless single-phase inverter for grid-tied
〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142061512005881〉]. photovoltaic system. Power Electron, IET 2015;8(4):636–44. http://dx.doi.org/
[58] Xiao B, Hang L, Mei J, Riley C, Tolbert L, Ozpineci B. Modular cascaded h-bridge 10.1049/iet-pel.2014.0251.
multilevel pv inverter with distributed mppt for grid-connected applications. IEEE [81] Yu W, Lai J-S, Qian H, Hutchens C. High-efficiency mosfet inverter with h6-type
Trans Ind Appl 2015;51(2):1722–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ configuration for photovoltaic nonisolated ac-module applications. IEEE Trans
TIA.2014.2354396. Power Electron 2011;26(4):1253–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/
[59] Eltawil MA, Zhao Z. Grid-connected photovoltaic power systems: technical and TPEL.2010.2071402.
potential problems a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2010;14(1):112–29. [82] Roasto I, Vinnikov D, Vodovozov V. Simulation and evaluation of control methods
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.015, [URL 〈http://www.sciencedirect. for the rolling stock static auxiliary converter based on three-level npc inverter
com/science/article/pii/S1364032109001749〉]. topology. In: Proceedings of the international conference on power engineering,
[60] Kjaer S, Pedersen J, Blaabjerg F. A review of single-phase grid-connected inverters energy and electrical drives, 2009. POWERENG ’09; 2009, p. 593–8. http://dx.
for photovoltaic modules. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 2005;41(5):1292–306. http:// doi.org/10.1109/POWERENG.2009.4915176
dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2005.853371. [83] Oliveira K, Cavalcanti M, Afonso J, Farias A, Neves F. Transformerless photo-
[61] Chowdhury A, Razzak M. Single phase grid-connected photovoltaic inverter for voltaic systems using neutral point clamped multilevel inverters. In: Proceedings
residential application with maximum power point tracking. In: Proceedings of the of the 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE); 2010,
2013 International Conference on Informatics, Electronics Vision (ICIEV), 2013, p. 1131–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISIE.2010.5636559.
p. 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICIEV.2013.6572648. [84] latha R, Bharatiraja C, Palanisamy R, sudeepbanerji, Dash SS. Hysteresis current
[62] Sastry J, Bakas P, Kim H, Wang L, Marinopoulos A. Evaluation of cascaded h- controller based transformerless split inductor-npc - {MLI} for grid connected pv-
bridge inverter for utility-scale photovoltaic systems. Renew Energy system. Procedia Engineering 64 (0) (2013) p. 224–33, international Conference
2014;69(0):208–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.03.049, [URL on Design and Manufacturing (IConDM2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148114002134〉]. proeng.2013.09.094. URL 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/

330
O.P. Mahela, A.G. Shaik Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68 (2017) 316–332

S1877705813016081〉 SPEEDAM.2010.5542118.
[85] Bharatiraja C, Jeevananthan S, Latha R. {FPGA} based practical implementation [106] Su Fen H, Ling-Zhi Y, Ju Cheng L, Zhe Zhi Y, Han Mei P. Design of three-phase
of npc-mli with {SVPWM} for an autonomous operation {PV} system with photovoltaic grid connected inverter based on rbf neural network. In: Proceedings
capacitor balancing. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2014;61(0):489–509. http:// of the International Conference on Sustainable Power Generation and Supply,
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.03.066, [URL 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/ 2009. SUPERGEN ’09; 2009, p. 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SUPERGEN.
science/article/pii/S0142061514001781〉]. 2009.5348129.
[86] Achilladelis N, Koutroulis E, Blaabjerg F. Optimized pulse width modulation for [107] Chunqing Q, Yong Y, Ji S. Deadbeat decoupling control of three-phase photo-
transformerless active-npc inverters. In: Proceedings of the 2014 16th European voltaic grid-connected inverters. In: Proceedings of the International Conference
Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE’14-ECCE Europe); 2014, on 2009 Mechatronics and Automation, 2009. ICMA; 2009, p. 3843–8. http://dx.
p. 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/EPE.2014.6910742. doi.org/10.1109/ICMA.2009.5244917.
[87] Wang Y, Wang F. Novel three-phase three-level-stacked neutral point clamped [108] Chen Y, Smedley K. Three-phase boost-type grid-connected inverter. IEEE Trans
grid-tied solar inverter with a split phase controller. IEEE Trans Power Electron Power Electron 2008;23(5):2301–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/
2013;28(6):2856–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2012.2226475. TPEL.2008.2003025.
[88] Taallah A, Mekhilef S. Active neutral point clamped converter for equal loss [109] Ming-hui S, Xiang-ji Z. Analysis on the monopolar three-phase solar grid-
distribution. Power Electron, IET 2014;7(7):1859–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ connected current source inverter. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Fourth
iet-pel.2013.0373. International Conference on Digital Manufacturing and Automation (ICDMA);
[89] De Caro S, Scimone T, Testa A, Cacciato M, Scarcella G. A npc transformerless 2013, p. 244–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICDMA.2013.58.
single phase inverter with inner voltage boosting capability. In: Proceedings of the [110] Chen Y, Smedley K. One-cycle-controlled three-phase grid-connected inverters
2014 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, and their parallel operation. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 2008;44(2):663–71. http://
Automation and Motion (SPEEDAM); 2014, p. 653–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2008.916718.
SPEEDAM.2014.6872072. [111] Siwakoti Y, Town G. Three-phase transformerless grid connected quasi z-source
[90] Daher S, Schmid J, Antunes F. Multilevel inverter topologies for stand-alone pv inverter for solar photovoltaic systems with minimal leakage current. In:
systems. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2008;55(7):2703–12. http://dx.doi.org/ Proceedings of the 2012 3rd IEEE international symposium on power electronics
10.1109/TIE.2008.922601. for distributed generation systems (PEDG); 2012, p. 368–73. http://dx.doi.org/
[91] Trabelsi M, Ghazi K, Al-Emadi N, Ben-Brahim L. A weighted real-time predictive 10.1109/PEDG.2012.6254028.
controller for a grid connected flying capacitors inverter. Int J Electr Power Energy [112] Chen L, Amirahmadi A, Zhang Q, Kutkut N, Batarseh I. Design and implemen-
Syst 2013;49(0):322–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.01.010, [URL tation of three-phase two-stage grid-connected module integrated converter. IEEE
〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142061513000380〉]. Trans Power Electron 2014;29(8):3881–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/
[92] Gao M, Chen M, Zhang C, Qian Z. Analysis and implementation of an improved TPEL.2013.2294933.
flyback inverter for photovoltaic ac module applications. IEEE Trans Power [113] Pan C-T, Chang J-Y, Lai C-M, Juan Y-L, Liao Y-H. Modeling of circulating
Electron 2014;29(7):3428–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2013.2279266. currents for grid-connected parallel three-phase inverters. In: Proceedings of the
[93] Yuan L, Cao Y, He F, Ma J, Chen Z, Lu T, Zhao Z. Design and implementation of SICE Annual Conference; 2008, p. 1319–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SICE.
three-phase two-bridge advanced neutral point clamped three-level photovoltaic 2008.4654862.
inverter. In: Proceedings of the 2014 17th International Conference on Electrical [114] Fri A, Bachtiri RE, Ghzizal AE. A comparative study of three topologies of three-
Machines and Systems (ICEMS); 2014, p. 816–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ phase (5l) inverter for a {PV} system, Energy Procedia 42 (0) (2013) p. 436–45,
ICEMS.2014.7013597. mediterranean Green Energy Forum 2013: Proceedings of an International
[94] Hasanzadeh A, Edrington C, Leonard J. Reduced switch npc-based transformer- Conference MGEF-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.11.044. URL
less pv inverter by developed switching pattern. In: Proceedings of the 2012 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876610213017463〉
Twenty-Seventh Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and [115] Xiao B, Tolbert L. Efficiency improved and current balanced three-phase modular
Exposition (APEC); 2012, p. 359–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/APEC.2012. cascaded h-bridge multilevel pv inverter for grid-connected applications. In:
6165844. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition
[95] Rampinelli G, Krenzinger A, Romero FC. Mathematical models for efficiency of (ECCE); 2014, p. 4661–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ECCE.2014.6954039.
inverters used in grid connected photovoltaic systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev [116] Franke W-T, Oestreich N, Fuchs F. Comparison of transformerless converter
2014;34(0):578–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.047, [URL 〈http:// topologies for photovoltaic application concerning efficiency and mechanical
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032114002081〉]. volume. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial
[96] Nayanasiri D, Vilathgamuwa D, Maskell D. Half-wave cycloconverter-based Electronics (ISIE); 2010, p. 724–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISIE.2010.
photovoltaic microinverter topology with phase-shift power modulation. IEEE 5637654.
Trans Power Electron 2013;28(6):2700–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ [117] Mahmud M, Pota H, Hossain M, Roy N. Robust partial feedback linearizing
TPEL.2012.2227502. stabilization scheme for three-phase grid-connected photovoltaic systems. IEEE J
[97] Bandara K, Sweet T, Ekanayake J. Photovoltaic applications for off-grid electri- Photovolt 2014;4(1):423–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/
fication using novel multi-level inverter technology with energy storage. Renew JPHOTOV.2013.2281721.
Energy 2012;37(1):82–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2011.05.036, [URL [118] Zmood D, Holmes D. Stationary frame current regulation of pwm inverters with
〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148111002898〉]. zero steady-state error. IEEE Trans Power Electron 2003;18(3):814–22. http://
[98] Phanikumar C, Agarwal V. Single phase 9 level grid connected inverter for dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2003.810852.
photovoltaic applications. In: Proceedings of the 2013 4th IEEE International [119] Teodorescu R, Blaabjerg F, Liserre M, Loh P. Proportional-resonant controllers
Symposium on Power Electronics for Distributed Generation Systems (PEDG); and filters for grid-connected voltage-source converters. Electr Power Appl, IEE
2013, p. 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PEDG.2013.6785631. Proc 2006;153(5):750–62.
[99] Flores P, Dixon J, Ortuzar M, Carmi R, Barriuso P, Moran L. Static var [120] Hassaine L, OLias E, Quintero J, Salas V. Overview of power inverter topologies
compensator and active power filter with power injection capability, using 27-level and control structures for grid connected photovoltaic systems. Renew Sustain
inverters and photovoltaic cells. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2009;56(1):130–8. Energy Rev 2014;30(0):796–807. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.005,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2008.927229. [URL 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032113007545〉].
[100] Barbosa P, Braga H, Teixeira E. Boost current multilevel inverter and its [121] Rey-Bou AB, Garca-Valverde R, de F, Ruz-Vila A, Torrelo-Ponce JM. An
application on single-phase grid-connected photovoltaic systems. IEEE Trans integrative approach to the design methodology for 3-phase power conditioners in
Power Electron 2006;21(4):1116–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ photovoltaic grid-connected systems. Energy Convers Manag 2012;56(0):80–95.
TPEL.2006.876784. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2011.11.012, [URL 〈http://www.
[101] Zeng Z, Yang H, Zhao R, Cheng C. Topologies and control strategies of multi- sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019689041100330X〉].
functional grid-connected inverters for power quality enhancement: a compre- [122] Schonardie M, Ruseler A, Coelho R, Martins D. Three-phase grid-connected pv
hensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2013;24(0):223–70. http:// system with active and reactive power control using dq0 transformation. In:
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.033, [URL 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/ Proceedings of the 2010 9th IEEE/IAS international conference on industry
science/article/pii/S1364032113001925〉]. applications (INDUSCON); 2010, p. 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/INDUSCON.
[102] Meneses D, Blaabjerg F, Garcia O, Cobos J. Review and comparison of step-up 2010.5740001.
transformerless topologies for photovoltaic ac-module application. IEEE Trans [123] Liang M, Zheng T. Synchronous pi control for three-phase grid-connected
Power Electron 2013;28(6):2649–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ photovoltaic inverter. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Chinese control and decision
TPEL.2012.2227820. conference (CCDC); 2010, p. 2302–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CCDC.2010.
[103] Yusof M, Othman M, Lee SS, Roslan M, Leong J. Three-phase multilevel inverter 5498813.
with reduced number of active power semiconductor switches for solar pv [124] Louzazni M, Aroudam E. Control and stabilization of three-phase grid connected
modules. In: Proceedings of the 2014 2nd international conference on electronic photovoltaics using pid-fuzzy logic. In: Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE
design (ICED); 2014, p. 329–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICED.2014.7015824. International Conference on Intelligent Energy and Power Systems (IEPS); 2014,
[104] Kim Y, Cha H, Song B-M, Lee K. Design and control of a grid-connected three- p. 279–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IEPS.2014.6874195.
phase 3-level npc inverter for building integrated photovoltaic systems. In: [125] Hassaine L, Olas E, Quintero J, Barrado A. Power control for grid connected
Proceedings of the innovative smart grid technologies (ISGT), 2012 IEEE PES; applications based on the phase shifting of the inverter output voltage with respect
2012, p. 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ISGT.2012.6175663. to the grid voltage. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2014;57(0):250–60. http://
[105] Griva G, Oleschuk V, Di Leo P, Spertino F. Synchronously modulated cascaded dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2013.12.009, [URL 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/
neutral-clamped converters for photovoltaic application. In: Proceedings of the science/article/pii/S0142061513005255〉].
2010 international symposium on power electronics electrical drives automation [126] Lalili D, Mellit A, Lourci N, Medjahed B, Berkouk E. Input output feedback
and motion (SPEEDAM); 2010, p. 809–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ linearization control and variable step size {MPPT} algorithm of a grid-connected

331
O.P. Mahela, A.G. Shaik Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68 (2017) 316–332

photovoltaic inverter. Renew Energy 2011;36(12):3282–91. http://dx.doi.org/ thirty-first IEEE photovoltaic specialists conference, 2005; 2005, p. 1601–6.
10.1016/j.renene.2011.04.027, [URL 〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2005.1488451.
article/pii/S0960148111001996〉]. [130] Moore L, Post H, Hayden H, Canada S, Narang D. Photovoltaic power plant
[127] Hassaine L, Olias E, Quintero J, Haddadi M. Digital power factor control and experience at arizona public service: a 5-year assessment. Prog Photovolt: Res
reactive power regulation for grid-connected photovoltaic inverter. Renew Energy Appl 2005;13(4):353–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pip.593.
2009;34(1):315–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.03.016, [URL [131] Jazayeri M, Uysal S, Jazayeri K. A comparative study on different photovoltaic
〈http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148108000967〉]. array topologies under partial shading conditions. In: Proceedings of the 2014
[128] Li X, Zhang D, Li Y, Xu Y. Multi-string photovoltaic grid-connected inverter based IEEE PES T D Conference and Exposition; 2014, p. 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.
on alternate single-phase pwm control. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Asia-Pacific 1109/TDC.2014.6863384.
Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC); 2012, p. 1–4. http://dx. [132] Deline C, Marion B. A performance and economic analysis of distributed power
doi.org/10.1109/APPEEC.2012.6306909. electronics in photovoltaic systems. Natl Renew Energy Lab NREL/TP-5200-
[129] Marion B, Adelstein J, Boyle K, Hayden H, Hammond B, Fletcher T, Canada B, 50003 2011:1–20.
Narang D, Kimber A, Mitchell L, Rich G, Townsend T. Performance parameters [133] Solar generation: Solar photovoltaic electricity empowering the world. European
for grid-connected pv systems. In: Proceedings of the conference record of the Photovoltaic Industry Association Solar Generation 6 (2011) p. 1–110.

332