Astm C 1260 PDF
Astm C 1260 PDF
Astm C 1260 PDF
granulated blast-furnace slag should be evaluated (see last should always be used. These should include full-face shields,
sentence of 4.1). rubber aprons, and gloves impervious to NaOH. Gloves should
be checked periodically for pin holes.
5. Apparatus
5.1 The apparatus shall conform to Specification C 490, 7. Conditioning
except as follows: 7.1 Maintain the temperature of the molding room and dry
5.2 Sieves—Square hole, woven-wire cloth sieves, shall materials at not less than 20 °C (68 °F) and not more than 27.5
conform to Specification E 11. °C (81.5 °F). The temperature of the mixing water, and of the
5.3 Mixer, Paddle, and Mixing Bowl—Mixer, paddle, and moist closet or moist room, shall not vary from 23 °C (73.4 °F)
mixing bowl shall conform to the requirements of Practice by more than 1.7 °C (3 °F).
C 305, except that the clearance between the lower end of the 7.2 Maintain the relative humidity of the molding room at
paddle and the bottom of the bowl shall be 5.1 6 0.3 mm (0.20 not less than 50 %. The moist closet or room shall conform to
6 0.01 in.). Specification C 511.
5.4 Tamper and Trowel—The tamper and trowel shall con- 7.3 Maintain the storage oven or water bath in which the
form to Test Method C 109/C 109M. specimens are stored in the containers at a temperature of 80.0
5.5 Containers—The containers shall be of such a nature 6 2.0 °C (176 6 3.6 °F).
that the bars can be totally immersed in either the water or 1N
NaOH solution. The containers shall be made of material that 8. Sampling and Preparation of Test Specimens
can withstand prolonged exposure to 80 °C (176 °F) and must 8.1 Selection of Aggregate—Process materials proposed for
be resistant to a 1N NaOH solution (see Note 1). The use as fine aggregate in concrete as described in the section on
containers must be so constructed that when used for storing Preparation of Aggregate with a minimum of crushing. Process
specimens, the loss or gain of moisture is prevented by materials proposed for use as coarse aggregate in concrete by
tight-fitting covers, by sealing, or both (see Note 2). The bars crushing to produce as nearly as practical a graded product
in the solution must be placed and supported so that the from which a sample can be obtained. Grade the sample as
solution has access to the entire surface of the bar; therefore, it prescribed in Table 1. The sample shall represent the compo-
should be ensured that the specimens do not touch the sides of sition of the coarse aggregate as proposed for use.
the container or each other. The specimens, if stood upright in 8.1.1 When a given quarried material is proposed for use
the solution, shall not be supported by the metal gauge stud. both as coarse and as fine aggregate, test it only by selection of
an appropriate sample crushed to the fine aggregates sizes,
NOTE 1—The NaOH solution will corrode glass or metal containers.
NOTE 2—Some microwave-proof food storage containers made of unless there is reason to expect that the coarser size fractions
polypropylene or high-density polythylene have been found to be accept- have a different composition that the finer sizes and that these
able. differences might significantly affect expansion due to reaction
5.6 Oven, or Water Bath—A convection oven or water bath with the alkalies in cement or from the environment of service.
with temperature control maintaining 80.0 6 2.0 °C (176 6 3.6 In this case test the coarser size fractions in a manner similar
°F). to that employed in testing the fine aggregate sizes.
8.2 Preparation of Aggregate—Grade all aggregates to
6. Reagents which this test method is applied in accordance with the
requirements given in Table 1. Crush aggregates in which
6.1 Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH)—USP or technical grade sufficient quantities of the sizes specified in Table 1 do not exist
may be used, provided the Na+ and OH− concentrations are
shown by chemical analysis to lie between 0.99N and 1.01N.
6.2 Purity of Water—Unless otherwise indicated, references TABLE 1 Grading Requirements
to water shall be understood to mean reagent water conforming Sieve Size
Mass, %
to Type IV of Specification D 1193. Passing Retained on
6.3 Sodium Hydroxide Solution—Each litre of solution shall 4.75 mm (No. 4) 2.36 mm (No. 8) 10
contain 40.0 g of NaOH dissolved in 900 mL of water, and 2.36 mm (No. 8) 1.18 mm (No. 16) 25
shall be diluted with additional distilled or deionized water to 1.18 mm (No. 16) 600 µm (No. 30) 25
600 µm (No. 30) 300 µm (No. 50) 25
obtain 1.0 L of solution. The volume proportion of sodium 300 µm (No. 50) 150 µm (No. 100) 15
hydroxide solution to mortar bars in a storage container shall
APPENDIX
(Nonmandatory Information)
X1.1 There is good agreement in the published literature innocuous and deleterious in field performance. For these
(1,2,7-10) for the following expansion limits: aggregates, it is particularly important to develop supplemental
X1.1.1 Expansions of less than 0.10 % at 16 days after information as described in 4.3. In such a situation, it may also
casting are indicative of innocuous behavior in most cases (see be useful to take comparator readings until 28 days (8,10).
Note X1.1).
NOTE X1.1—Some granitic gneisses and metabasalts have been found
X1.1.2 Expansions of more than 0.20 % at 16 days after to be deleteriously expansive in field performance even though their
casting are indicative of potentially deleterious expansion (see expansion in this test was less than 0.10 % at 16 days after casting (10).
4.3). With such aggregate, it is recommended that prior field performance be
X1.1.3 Expansions between 0.10 and 0.20 % at 16 days investigated. In the absence of field performance data, mitigative measures
after casting include both aggregates that are known to be should be taken as discussed in 4.4.
(1) Oberholster, R. E., and Davies, G.,“ An Accelerated Method for (6) Hooton, R. D.,“ Interlaboratory Study of the NBRI Rapid Test Method
Testing the Potential Alkali Reactivity of Siliceous Aggregates.” and CSA Standardization Status,” Report EM-92, Ontario Ministry of
Cement and Concrete Research, Vol 16, 1986, pp. 181–189. Transport, March 1990, pp. 225–240.
(2) Davies, G., and Oberholster, R. E., “Use of the NBRI Accelerated Test (7) Hooton, R. D., and Rogers, C. A., “Evaluation of Rapid Test Methods
to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Mineral Admixtures in Preventing the for Detecting Alkali-Reactive Aggregates,” Proceedings, Eighth Inter-
Alkali-Silica Reaction,” Cement and Concrete Research, Vol 17, 1987, national Conference on Alkali-Aggregate Reaction, Kyoto, 1989, pp.
pp. 97–107. 439–444.
(3) Davies, G., and Oberholster, R. E., “An Interlaboratory Test Pro- (8) Hooton, R. D.,“ New Aggregate Alkali-Reactivity Test Methods,”
gramme on the NBRI Accelerated Test to Determine the Alkali- Report MAT-91-14, Ontario Ministry of Transportation, November
Reactivity of Aggregates,” National Building Research Institute, 1991.
CSIRO, Special Report BOU 92-1987, Pretoria, RSA, 1987, 16 pp. (9) Fournier, B., and Berube, M. A., “Application of the NBRI Accelerated
(4) Oberholster, R. E., “Alkali Reactivity of Siliceous Rock Aggregates: Mortar Bar Test to Siliceous Carbonate Aggregates Produced in the St.
Diagnosis of the Reaction, Testing of Cement and Aggregate and Lawrence Lowlands, Part 2: Proposed Limits, Rates of Expansion, and
Prescription of Preventative Measures,” Alkali in Concrete, Research Microstructure of Reaction Products,” Cement and Concrete Research,
and Practice, Copenhagen, 1983, Danish Concrete Association, pp. Vol 21, 1991, pp. 1069–1082.
419–433. (10) Hooton, R. D., and Rogers, C. A., “Development of the NBRI Rapid
(5) Rogers, C.A., “Multi-laboratory Study of the Accelerated Mortar Bar Mortar Bar Test Leading to its Use in North America,” Proceedings,
Test (ASTM Test Method C 1260) for Alkali-Silica Reaction,” Ninth International Conference on AAR in Concrete, London, 1992,
Cement, Concrete, and Aggregates, Vol 21, 1999, pp. 185–194. pp. 461–467.
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
Committee C09 has identified the location of selected changes to this test method since the last issue,
C 1260 – 05a, that may impact the use of this test method. (Approved June 1, 2007)
Committee C09 has identified the location of selected changes to this test method since the last issue,
C 1260 – 05, that may impact the use of this test method. (Approved December 15, 2005)
(1) Revised the Referenced Documents section. (3) Revised 8.4.3 and added new 8.4.3.1 and 8.4.3.2.
(2) Added a Terminology section.
ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned
in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk
of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards
and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the
responsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should
make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.
This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,
United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above
address or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or service@astm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website
(www.astm.org).
--```,`,```,`,,,`,`,,,,,``,```-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---