Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 308 views

    How To Evaluate For PAUT

    Uploaded by

    phan hoang diep
    This document contains information about linear interpolation formulas used to calculate thickness to length (a/t) and height to thickness (h/t) ratios for flaws when the direct ratios are not listed in reference tables. It provides the specific dimensions and ratios calculated for two example components using the interpolation formulas. Both examples compare the calculated ratios to acceptance criteria in ASME VIII Div 2 2015 and Code Case 181 to determine if the flaws would be accepted or rejected.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    How To Evaluate For PAUT

    Uploaded by

    phan hoang diep
    308 views6 pages
    This document contains information about linear interpolation formulas used to calculate thickness to length (a/t) and height to thickness (h/t) ratios for flaws when the direct ratios are not listed in reference tables. It provides the specific dimensions and ratios calculated for two example components using the interpolation formulas. Both examples compare the calculated ratios to acceptance criteria in ASME VIII Div 2 2015 and Code Case 181 to determine if the flaws would be accepted or rejected.

    Original Title

    how to evaluate for PAUT.xlsx

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains information about linear interpolation formulas used to calculate thickness to length (a/t) and height to thickness (h/t) ratios for flaws when the direct ratios are not listed in reference tables. It provides the specific dimensions and ratios calculated for two example components using the interpolation formulas. Both examples compare the calculated ratios to acceptance criteria in ASME VIII Div 2 2015 and Code Case 181 to determine if the flaws would be accepted or rejected.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    308 views6 pages

    How To Evaluate For PAUT

    Uploaded by

    phan hoang diep
    This document contains information about linear interpolation formulas used to calculate thickness to length (a/t) and height to thickness (h/t) ratios for flaws when the direct ratios are not listed in reference tables. It provides the specific dimensions and ratios calculated for two example components using the interpolation formulas. Both examples compare the calculated ratios to acceptance criteria in ASME VIII Div 2 2015 and Code Case 181 to determine if the flaws would be accepted or rejected.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 6

    a/t=a1/t1+(a/l-a1/l1)/(a2/l2-a1/l1)*(a2/t2-a1/t1)

    (Linear interpolation formula)

    Thick. 56
    Heigth
    Depth (d) Length (l) (a or 2a) Sur/Sub a/l (sizing)
    29 26 4.7 SUBSURFACE 0.09
    0

    a/l (table) a/t (table)


    Linear interpolation a/t when a/l not already in table
    1st 0.05 0.038
    2nd 0.10 0.043
    a/t (table interpolation)= 0.042

    h/t=h1/t1+(h/l-h1/l1)/(h2/l2-h1/l1)*(h2/t2-h1/t1)
    (Linear interpolation formula)

    Thick. 63.5
    Depth (d) Length (l) Heigth (h) Sur/Sub h/l (sizing)
    19 200 5 SUBSURFACE 0.03

    h/l (table) h/t (table)


    Linear interpolation h/t when h/l not already in table 51.00
    1st 0.00 0.068
    2nd 0.10 0.076
    h/t (table interpolation)= 0.070
    ASME VIII DIV. 2 2015
    CREATED BY: PHAN HOANG DIEP

    Thickness Between 25 mm and


    less than or equal to 64 mm

    Flaw Flaw
    a/t (Actual sizing) ACC/REJ Aspec Ratio SURFACE Aspec Ratio
    0.042 ACC a/l a/t a/l
    0.00 0.031 0.00
    0.05 0.033 0.05
    0.10 0.036 0.10
    0.15 0.041 0.15
    0.20 0.047 0.20
    0.25 0.055 0.25
    0.30 0.064 0.30
    0.35 0.074 0.35
    0.40 0.083 0.40
    0.45 0.085 0.45
    0.50 0.087 0.50

    t2-h1/t1) CODE CASE 181. 2012


    SURFACE FLAW SUBSURFACE FLAW
    25<=t<=64 25<=t<=64

    Flaw Flaw
    Aspec Ratio SURFACE Aspec Ratio SUBSURFACE
    h/l h/t h/l h/t
    h/t (Actual sizing) ACC/REJ 0.00 0.031 0.00 0.068
    0.079 REJ 0.05 0.033 0.10 0.076
    0.10 0.036 0.20 0.086
    0.15 0.041 0.30 0.098
    0.20 0.047 0.40 0.114
    0.25 0.055 0.50 0.132
    0.30 0.064 0.60 0.156
    0.35 0.074 0.70 0.180
    0.40 0.083 0.80 0.210
    0.45 0.085 0.90 0.246
    0.50 0.087 1.00 0.286
    2 2015

    25 mm and
    to 64 mm

    SUBSURFACE
    a/t
    0.034
    0.038
    0.043
    0.054
    0.066
    0.078
    0.090
    0.103
    0.116
    0.129
    0.143

    You might also like