Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Research Matrix Sofia

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

RESEARCH MATRIX

TITLE PROBLEMS VARIABLES INDICATORS DATA RESOURCES RESEARCH METHODS HYPOTHESIS


The Effect Of 1. General problem a. Teaching speking  The use of simulation 1. Research subjects the 1. Research design: 1. Major Hypothesis
Simulation by is there any significant using simulation by by guessing a picture . students of SMPN 1 experimental research There is asignificant effect
Gussing a Picture effect of simulation by guessing a picture  Making a group Srono in the 2015/2016 (post test design) of simulation by guessing
On The Eighth Year gussing a picture on the  Showing the picture academic year. 2. Area determination a picture on the eight year
Students’ English eighth year students’  Action 2. Informant: method: students’ speaking ability
Speking ability Of english speking ability of The english teacher 3. Data analysis method : of SMPN 1 Srono in the
SMP 1 Srono In SMPN 1 srono in the 3. School documents T-test = 2015/2016 academic year
The 2015/2016 2015/2016 academic year? a. The name of 2. Minor Hypothesis
Academic Year 2. Specific problems b. Students’ speaking  Students’ scors of subjects a. There is a significant effect
a. Is there any significant ability speking test b. The students’ of simulation by guessing a
effect of simulation by 1. Fluency previous speaking picture on the eighth year
guessinga picture on the 2. Accuracy score students’ speaking fluency
𝑀𝑋 𝑀𝑌
eighth year students  Pronunciation of SMPN 1 Srono in the
speaking fluency of SMPN  Vocabulary ∑𝑋𝑋2+ ∑𝑋𝑌2 1 1 2015/2016 academic year
√( ) +
1 Srono in the 2015/2016 𝑁𝑋 + 𝑁𝑌 − 2 𝑁𝑋 𝑁𝑌 b. There is a significant effect
 Grammar
academic year? of simulation by guessing a
b. Is there any significant Where ; picture on the eighth year
effect of simulation by Mx = mean of the students’ speaking
guessinga picture on the Experimental group pronunciation of SMPN 1
eighth year students My = mean of the control Srono in the 2015/2016
speaking pronunciation of group academic year
SMPN 1 Srono in the ∑X2 = yhe total c. There is a significant effect
2015/2016 academic year? individual score deviation of simulation by guessing a
c. Is there any significant of Mx picture on the eighth year
effect of simulation by ∑Y2 = the total individual students’ speaking
guessinga picture on the score deviation of my vocabulary of SMPN 1
eighth year students Nx = the number of Srono in the 2015/2016
speaking vocabulary of subjects in group x academic year
SMPN 1 Srono in the Ny = the number of d. There is a significant effect
2015/2016 academic year? subjects in group y of simulation by guessing a
d. Is there any significant (Hadi,1990:443) picture on the eighth year
effect of simulation by students’ speaking
guessinga picture on the grammar of SMPN 1 Srono
eighth year students in the 2015/2016 academic
speaking grammar of year
SMPN 1 Srono in the
2015/2016 academic year?

Head of Research Institution, First Consultant, Second Consultant, Researcher,

drh. Arya Mahdi, M.Si. Murdiyanto, M.Pd. Wulan Wangi,M.Pd Ibnahul Sofia
NIK. 11.09.181 NIM. 12882030047

You might also like