Rigidity K : East-West North-South
Rigidity K : East-West North-South
Rigidity K : East-West North-South
ACI SP-17(14)
The Reinforced Concrete Design Handbook
1st printing
Seismic Load:
Importance, Ie = 1.0
Site class = D
SS = 0.15, SDS = 0.16
S1 = 0.08, SD1 = 0.13
Seismic design category = B
Equivalent lateral force procedure
Building frame system; ordinary reinforced concrete shear walls in the east-west north-south direction
o R=5
o Cs = 0.046
Moment-resting frame system; ordinary reinforced concrete moment frame in the north-south east-west direction
40,000
s 15 2.5cc
fs
40,000
s 12
fs
40, 000
s 15 2.5cc
fs
40, 000
s 12
fs
Volume 1: Page 293, Rigid Diaphragm Example 1, Step 5, table and equations revised as:
1
(24 in.)(24 in.)3
kc 165 in.3
12(14 ft)(12 in./ft)
12 Ec 1
ki 0.743Ec
1 in.
((14 ft)(12 in./ft)) 2
(7)(165 in.3 ) (6)(99 in.3 )
12 Ec 1
ki 1.122 Ec
1 in.
((12 ft)(12 in./ft)) 2
(7)(192 in.3 ) (6)(99 in.3 )
(1.0)(39 ft)
Fu , MF ,max (1036 ft-kip) 0.2 kip
2[(1.0)(39 ft) 2 (8.1)(109 ft) 2 ]
(1.0)(39 ft)
Fu ,MF ,max (1036 ft-kip) 0.2 kip
2[(1.0)(39 ft) 2 (6.7)(109 ft) 2 ]
(8.1)(218 ft/2)
Fu , wall ,max (546 ft-kip) 2.5 kip
2[(1.0)(39 ft) 2 (8.1)(109 ft) 2 ]
(6.7)(218 ft/2)
Fu ,wall ,max (546 ft-kip) 2.5 kip
2[(1.0)(39 ft) 2 (6.7)(109 ft) 2 ]
The difference due to eccentricity in the E-W direction is small. Therefore, use 70 kip.
(1.0)(78 ft/2)
Fu , MF (883 ft-kip) 0.2 kip
(2)[(1.0)(39 ft)2 (8.1)(109 ft)2 ]
3
(1.0)(78 ft/2)
Fu, MF (883 ft-kip) 0.2 kip
(2)[(1.0)(39 ft)2 (10.5)(109 ft)2 ]
(8.1)(109 ft)
Fu , wall (592 ft-kip) 2.7 kip
(2)[(1.0)(39 ft)2 +(8.1)(109 ft)2 ]
(10.5)(109 ft)
Fu, wall (592 ft-kip) 2.7 kip
(2)[(1.0)(39 ft)2 +(10.5)(109 ft)2 ]
(8.1)(218 ft/2)
Fu , wall (313 ft-kip) 1.4 kip
(2)[(1.0)(39 ft)2 (8.1)(109 ft)2 ]
4
(10.5)(218 ft/2)
Fu, wall (313 ft-kip) 1.4 kip
(2)[(1.0)(39 ft)2 (10.5)(109 ft)2 ]
The force distribution in the E-W direction for both calculated eccentricities is small. Therefore, use 58.0 kip.
Volume 1: Page 363, Columns Example 1, Step 2, 6.6.4.3(b) Calculation Column 3, equation revised as:
Pu
Q o
Vus c
Pu o
Q
Vus c
Volume 1: Page 372, Columns Example 2, Step 5, Calculation Column 3, equation revised as:
28.1 2.5
s 3 0.003 0.0914
28.1
28.1 2.5
s 3 0.003 0.00273
28.1
Volume 1: Page 404, Shear Wall Example 1, Step 7, 11.6.2, Calculation Column 3, equation revised as:
l 0.0025 0.5(2.5 90 ft / 28 ft )
0.62 in.2
( 0.0025)
(12 in.)(12 in.)
l 0.0019
l 0.0025 0.5(2.5 92 ft / 28 ft )
0.62 in.2
( 0.0025)
(12 in.)(12 in.)
l 0.0018
5
Volume 1: Page 404, Shear Wall Example 1, Step 8, 11.7.4.1, Calculation Column 3, revised as:
The maximum factored axial load is 1015 kips or 1,015,000 lb and the maximum factored moment is 3718,
6300 ft-kip or 446,400,000223,200,000 in.-lb. The factored axial stress on the concrete due to the combined
loads is:
= 1,015,000 lb/{(12 in.)(28 ft)(12 in./ft)} + 446,400,000223,200,000 in.-lb*336 in./37,933,056 in.4 = 4206
2229 psi.
Volume 1: Page 412, Shear Wall Example 2, Step 5, 18.10.2.2, Calculation Column 3, equation revised as:
Volume 1: Page 414, Shear Wall Example 2, Step 5, 18.10.6.2, Calculation Column 3, equations revised as:
(2.4 in.)(5)
u / hw
(96 ft)(12 in./ft)
u / hw 0.0104
(2.4 in.)(5)
u / hw
(92 ft)(12 in./ft)
u / hw 0.0109
336 in.
c 36 in.
600(1.5*0.0104)
336 in.
c 34.25 in.
600(1.5*0.0109)
Because c of 67.85 in. is greater than 34.256 in., Section 18.10.6.2 does require a boundary element.
6
Volume 1: Page 417, Shear Wall Example 2, Step 5, 18.10.6.4(f), Discussion Column 2, equations revised as:
Table 18.10.6.4(f)(a):
Ag f'
0.3 1 c
Ach f yt
Table 18.10.6.4(ba):
Ash f'
0.09 c
sbc f yt
Ash Ag f'
0.3 1 c
sbc Ach f yt
Volume 1: Page 417, Shear Wall Example 2, Step 5, 18.10.6.4(f), Calculation Column 3, equations revised as:
488
0.3 1 0.085
380
476
0.3 1 0.176 0.09
300
Since this is less greater than the minimum required by equation (b), use Table 18.10.6.4(ba):
5000 psi
Ash 0.09 (4 in.)(12 in.)
60,000 psi
Ash 0.36 in.2
5000 psi
Ash 0.176 (4 in.)(12 in.)
60,000 psi
Ash 0.7 in.2
7
No. 4 ties at 34 in. vertically satisfy 18.10.6.4(f).
Volume 1: Page 418, Shear Wall Example 2, Fig. E2.5, replace with the following figure:
8
Volume 1: Page 418, Shear Wall Example 2, Fig. E2.6, replace with the following figure:
1 sin
Ca s
1 sin
1 sin
Ca
1 sin
Volume 2, Page 143, DEFLECTION 13.2, equation with graph, revised as:
b / bw
b b / bw
10
Volume 2, Page 144, DEFLECTION 13.3.1, equation with graph, revised as:
b / bw
b b / bw
K crt 1 ( b 1) h [ 4 6 h 2 ( b 1) h 3 ]
K crt 1 ( b 1) h [ 4 6 h 4 h 2 + ( b 1) h 3 ]
1 h 2 ( b 1)
11
Volume 2, Page 145, DEFLECTION 13.3.2, replace with the following figure:
Volume 2, Page 145, DEFLECTION 13.3.2, equation with graph, revised as:
b / bw
b b / bw
Volume 2, Page 147, DEFLECTION 13.5, equation at bottom of page revised as:
Volume 2, Page 155, DEFLECTION 13.8.2, add sentence following two equations and above graph:
where Ka3 and Mc are from Deflection 13.8.1, Ie, is from Deflection 13.7.1 or 13.7.2, and Ec is from Deflection
13.10.
Volume 2, Page 362, Anchorage Example 18, Step 10: Side-face blowout, 17.3.3c(ii), Discussion Column 2
and Calculation Column 3 revised as:
Check that design strength is greater than N sbg 104,300 lb < N ua,g = 116, 000 lb NG
required strength:
13