Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 60 views

    Presentation of Device Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Ren Rubio Gallemit
    The rubric assesses presentations on criteria such as presentation, framing responses, mastery, development, and content. A score of 16-20 equates to a grade of 91-100% and is considered "very good". It requires delivering clear information free from errors, answering all questions, formulating a clear point of view, and demonstrating a mastery of content with examples. Scores of 11-15 and 6-10 equate to grades of 86-90% and 81-85%, considered "good" and "fair". Lower scores equate to grades of 75-80% or less, considered "needs improvement".

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Presentation of Device Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Ren Rubio Gallemit
    60 views5 pages
    The rubric assesses presentations on criteria such as presentation, framing responses, mastery, development, and content. A score of 16-20 equates to a grade of 91-100% and is considered "very good". It requires delivering clear information free from errors, answering all questions, formulating a clear point of view, and demonstrating a mastery of content with examples. Scores of 11-15 and 6-10 equate to grades of 86-90% and 81-85%, considered "good" and "fair". Lower scores equate to grades of 75-80% or less, considered "needs improvement".

    Original Description:

    For ed tech

    Original Title

    Rubrics

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The rubric assesses presentations on criteria such as presentation, framing responses, mastery, development, and content. A score of 16-20 equates to a grade of 91-100% and is considered "very good". It requires delivering clear information free from errors, answering all questions, formulating a clear point of view, and demonstrating a mastery of content with examples. Scores of 11-15 and 6-10 equate to grades of 86-90% and 81-85%, considered "good" and "fair". Lower scores equate to grades of 75-80% or less, considered "needs improvement".

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    60 views5 pages

    Presentation of Device Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Ren Rubio Gallemit
    The rubric assesses presentations on criteria such as presentation, framing responses, mastery, development, and content. A score of 16-20 equates to a grade of 91-100% and is considered "very good". It requires delivering clear information free from errors, answering all questions, formulating a clear point of view, and demonstrating a mastery of content with examples. Scores of 11-15 and 6-10 equate to grades of 86-90% and 81-85%, considered "good" and "fair". Lower scores equate to grades of 75-80% or less, considered "needs improvement".

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 5

    PRESENTATION OF DEVICE RUBRIC

    Criteria Value

    4 3 2 1

    Presentation Delivers the Delivers the Delivers the Delivers the


    information clearly information clearly information clearly information vaguely and
    and free from and free from and free from with spotted
    grammatical errors. grammatical errors. grammatical errors. grammatical errors.

    Presenter’s answers Presenter’s could Presenter could Presenter cannot


    to the judges’ answers the answer a few answer any question.
    questions indicated questions to the questions.
    indicated an satisfaction of the
    exceptional judges.
    understanding of the
    research subject.

    Frames Personal Formulates a clear Formulates a clear Formulates a vague Fails to formulate point
    Responses and and precise point of and precise point of and indecisive point of view and fails to
    Acknowledges view, acknowledges view, acknowledges of view, and anticipate in the
    Others’ raised queries and raised queries but anticipates only in objection and queries
    Perspectives provides convincing seriously discuses its minor objections. raised.
    replies. strengths and
    weaknesses rather
    than providing
    convincing replies.

    Mastery and The scope of the The scope of the The scope of the The scope of the
    Preparedness presentation was presentation was presentation was presentation was
    excellent, appropriate, limited, considering inappropriate.
    considering both considering both both topic and time
    topic and time topic and time allowed.
    allowed. allowed.

    The presenter showed


    The presenter
    lacked depth of
    The presenter The presenter showed limited depth
    understanding of
    showed excellent showed proficient of understanding of
    relevant Mathematical
    depth of depth of relevant
    concepts and principles.
    understanding of understanding of Mathematical
    relevant relevant concepts and
    Mathematical Mathematical principles.
    concepts and concepts and
    principles. principles.

    Development There was unity, There was generally The lack of sequential There was no logical
    coherence and logical sequence to flow seriously sequence to the flow of
    inherent logic in the the presentation. interfered with the ideas.
    sequence of ideas. objective of the
    presentation.
    The presenter The presenter did not
    The presenter showed some show examples or
    showed sufficient examples and The presenter counter-examples.
    examples and counter-examples. showed a very limited
    counter-examples. number of examples
    and
    counter-examples.

    Content The presentation had The presentation The presentation had The presentation had
    substantial, specific had sufficient limited illustrative an absence of relevant
    and illustrative content. content. content.
    content.

    The presenter makes The presenter is The presenter is


    The presenter reference to unaware of practical unaware of practical
    includes complete, practical application application or application or
    specific examples of or correlation with correlation with correlation with other
    practical application other disciplines and other disciplines and disciplines and
    or correlation with used appropriate made notational correlation with other
    other disciplines and mathematical errors. disciplines and made
    used appropriate notations with minor notational errors.
    mathematical errors.
    notations and used it The project
    correctly. contained multiple The project contained
    The project minor and major substantial
    contained limited Mathematical errors. Mathematical errors.
    The project minor Mathematical
    contained no errors.
    Mathematical errors.

    Total

    Points Earned Equivalent Description

    16-20 91-100 Very Good

    11-15 86-90 Good

    6-10 81-85 Fair


    1-5 75-80 Needs Improvement

    You might also like