DRAFT COPY UNDER REVISION (11 Jan.

2012)

The Experimental Life Energy Meter:

History, Operational Procedures
and Suggested Experiments

by James DeMeo, PhD

Orgone Biophysical Research Lab (OBRL)

Introduction and History

The Heliognosis Experimental Life Energy Meter, or LEM, is a solid-

state reproduction of the original Orgone Energy Field Meter, or OEFM,
as developed in the 1940s by the late Dr. Wilhelm Reich. Reich
described its construction and use in his book The Cancer Biopathy,
(page 147-150 of the Farrar, Straus & Giroux 1973 reprint edition*) as
part of a longer discussion on the objective measurement of an unusual
new energy which he discovered in both the atmosphere, and as
radiating from living organisms and some other materials. His early
device used large sheet metal plates in a special parallel capacitor-type
of arrangement, excited by an induction coil, with a light bulb and
photometer providing an indication of the measured field strength of
whatever was being measured.
* http://www.orgonelab.org/cart/xReich.htm

Using the OEFM and other methods, Reich was able to demonstrate
variable life-energy charge or energy-field readings for both humans and
other living creatures. This included the recording of the progressive
loss of energy readings with the death of a small fish. His findings were
suggestive of the later work of Semyon and Valentina Kirlian, who used
photographic films to make images of the human energy field using a
similar metal plate and induction-coil for exciting the life-energy field
into a visible glow, or what has been termed a bio-plasma discharge.
Reich’s OEFM can be considered as an early analog apparatus for
measuring what the Kirlian method revealed graphically on films.
My own early reproductions of Reich’s original design, for the OEFM,
basically validated his observations. Reich’s OEFM, as I reconstructed
it, operated quite exactly as he described it, and provided clear readings
of the human energy field. It also reacted to metals and to water, as well
as to other living creatures. My first reproduction of the OEFM was a
primitive and heavy table-top design using a Tesla-type induction coil,
and so did not allow determinations of variable field-strengths, as from
one person to another. Later designs were more portable, hand-held
varieties, and suggested the potentials of this device to eventually
become a serious instrument for scientific and diagnostic health
research. However, the Tesla induction coil which lay at the heart of the
instrument, as we reconstructed it, always created irritating sparks and
ozone, pushing the background life-energy field of my laboratory into a
mild and temporary oranur effect (See the chapter on The Oranur
Experiment in Reich’s book Selected Writings* for details). Our OEFM
reproduction additionally was prone to giving both the test subject and
the instrument operator the occasional jolting shock. As I was not
skilled in electronic design, that is as far as my own efforts went, and
other research dominated my attention.
* http://www.orgonelab.org/cart/xReich.htm

Approximately in 1990, I learned of the work done by the Canadian

electronics engineer, Mr. Dave Marett of the Heliognosis* company,
who had developed a similar type of life-energy meter, which used an
electromagnetic oscillator of exceedingly low power for its excitation,
and hence was silent in operation, did not create any ozone or shocks.
This new Life Energy Meter, or the LEM, went through a variety of
evaluations and improvements over the years, to arrive at the present-
day design which is currently being sold commercially as an
experimental meter. Neither Reich’s original OEFM or the newer LEM
reacted to standard electrostatic charge or to other electromagnetic
fields, as would a millivoltmeter or an EMF meter.
* http://www.heliognosis.com
Experiences with millivoltmeters can reveal the life-energy field, as
shown by scientists such as Harold Burr,* but these require instruments
with direct electrode contact, and under exacting laboratory conditions
where the subject must lie very still. Anyone walking about in the room
will disturb the readings, which typically are at only a few hundred
millivolts. One can also attach a metal plate to the positive pole of a
typical millivoltmeter, and show the reaction when you approach it with
your body, or just your hand. But in such a case, the readings will rise
as you approach the metal plate, and then quickly fall off to zero. If you
then move away from the metal plate, the voltmeter will again react, in
the opposing polarity, and again fall back to zero. These types of
readings with millivoltmeters have certain uses, and do also demonstrate
the existence of the life-energy field, but only when it is in motion.
Only the Reich-type of OEFM, as now reproduced by Marett of
Heliognosis, will show a constant sustained reading of the life-energy
field, showing it is not merely some kind of electrostatics.
* http://www.orgonelab.org/cart/xlifenergy.htm

The LEM detects, as Reich argued, a completely new parameter of our

existence.
Preparing for Experiments with the LEM

Use the Supplied Power Source: The LEM can be used both indoors or
outdoors, wherever a suitable connection to the power mains can be
found. Experiments have shown it cannot be used with batteries, due to
the necessity for a good earth grounding. Experiments have shown, it
can be powered by an automobile battery, where the negative terminal
also has a separate grounding rod into the earth. The voltage is not the
issue here, so much as the grounding. We therefore suggest, especially
for your first experiments, to use it only with the supplied power source.

Allow the LEM to Warm Up: When turning on the meter, allow it
approximately 30 minutes to warm up, especially for more detailed
readings. It will show typical reactions immediately after being turned
on, but will be difficult to zero until it is warmed.

Keep Your Hands Away! If you bring your hand close to the LEM, it
will react. This is fine if you are measuring your hands, but not good if
you are measuring something else. So don’t hold items in your hand as
you measure them. Place them on the SMALL PLATE ELECTRODE
or otherwise secure them with a holding system and move them closer or
farther from the LEM using the VACUUM TUBE ELECTRODE.

Be Gentle! Every LEM is hand-constructed without mass-production

methods. Don’t force anything. Gently push the electrodes into the
banana-plug outlets, and remove them gently. Do Not Drop!
The Easy Demonstrations: Human and Plant Life Energy Fields.

Experiment 1: Revealing and Measuring the Human Energy Field

1. Find a clear space on a desk or table-top where the LEM can sit all by
itself, without nearby objects.

2. Attach either the vacuum-tube electrode or the flat-plate electrode, to

the UPPER RED PROBE outlet on the back side. Set the toggle switch
to the SMALL position.

3. With the meter OFF, plug in the power supply to the instrument and
to the wall power outlet.

4. Turn the sensitivity RANGE to 1x. This will automatically turn on

the LEM. Allow the LEM to warm up for a modest period.

5. After warming, set the FINE ZERO knob to half-way, at 3. With

nothing touching or close to the electrode, slowly adjust the COARSE
ZERO up and down until you observe the analog needle move. Set it to
the zero position, using the FINE ZERO as necessary.

6. With these settings, the meter will now readily react to the movement
of your hand towards the meter. You can touch the electrodes to get a
maximal reading, which should not drive it above the 100% mark.

7. Re-zero the instrument as needed.

8. The Handedness Parameter: Using the Small Plate Electrode, on the

wood support, compare the readings between your left versus right hand.
It should show a slight difference, with a slightly higher reading for your
dominant hand.
9. The Vitality Parameter: Compare the readings between different
people. Those who do more outdoors manual work should give higher
readings on their hands than those who work primarily indoors. We had
one clear example of this in a seminar where about 30 people in
attendance took turns measuring the field-strength of their hands. The
strongest reading came from a man who was a bee-keeper. He had a
good suntan, a relaxed posture with good respiration and open clear
eyes, and overall radiated vitality and health. The lowest reading came
from a man who worked indoors with computers all day, and who
emphasized his “spirituality” and vegan diet to others in the room. He
was very upset when the LEM showed his readings to be so low.

10. Increase the sensitivity RANGE to the 10x or 100x positions. With
these settings, the LEM will now react, and probably be driven off-scale
above the 100x, if you try and touch the electrodes. However, it will
then reveal more dramatically the life-energy field at a distance.

Experiment 2: Scanning the Human Energy Field:

1. With the power supply and electrodes removed, examine the bottom
of the LEM. Note the small hole in the middle. This is for attaching to a
camera tripod or hand-grip with standard quarter-inch screw.

2. With the LEM secured to a camera hand-grip, attach the VACUUM

TUBE ELECTRODE. This electrode is interesting because it
demonstrates how the life-energy field can pass through the rarified
vacuum.

3. As before, warm and zero the instrument with a RANGE setting of

100x. Once it is warmed up, and while holding the LEM by the hand-
grip at the bottom, with nobody else standing nearby, zero the
instrument.

4. When zeroed, you can now move the LEM near to another person
who must stand still and relaxed. You can scan their body from top to
bottom, on front and back sides, and note there are variations in the field
strength unrelated to only distance. Re-zero as necessary. It may be
necessary to use an extension cable such that the power-supply wires are
of sufficient length.

5. ISSUES: Sometimes the material composition of the hand-grip will

allow troubling reactions with the instrument operator’s own life-energy
field. In this case, you can try using a long wood table leg, as found in
most hardware stores, and which also have a ¼ inch screw thread.
Wood is a poor conductor of the life-energy, and a longer table leg will
allow a greater distance for the operator’s hands during measurements.
Also be aware, at higher sensitivity ranges, the power-supply cable may
become reactive, and require to keep away from both the operator and
test subject, as well as off the floor, depending upon composition. Since
every house and room will have different material compositions, good
experimental method requires to test out the environment fully as a
control procedure.

6. Helignosis has developed a special scanning carriage, which

automatically holds the LEM and moves it at a constant speed up and
down. When attached to a computer for data-recording, using the
LEM’s output jack, one can generate recordings of variations in a
person’s life-energy field. This is a more complicated procedure which
will not be described here, and requires technical skills with a computer
and DAQ system, as well as purchase of the carriage accessory. But for
most experimental determinations, this simple scanning method using a
camera-hand grip (or wood table-leg) will be suitable.

Experiment 3: Scanning the Energy Fields of Plants and Leaves:

1. Using the LEM configuration as described in Experiment 2, above,

with hand-grip and Vacuum Tube Electrode, we now move outdoors to
study the energy fields of plants.
2. Obtain an extension cord for the power supply to give suitable access
to wherever you will make your measurements. Plug in and warm up
the instrument, setting to 10x.

3. After warming and zeroing, move the vacuum tube electrode close to
the leaves of a living plant. It will show a reaction which is roughly in
keeping with the vigor of plant growth. The tips of growing plant
branches, or the top-most growing tip, will give higher readings than
older growth on the sides of branches, or along the trunk. At least, this
is our experience using the LEM for small conifers and larger trees in
the Pacific Northwest USA, as well as for a few deciduous varieties and
potted plants.

4. Marett has demonstrated a “dying leaf” experiment* with the LEM

which mirrors the “dying fish” experiment of Reich. Even when
moisture content is stabilized, the LEM shows a progressive
deterioration of the field strength readings of a leaf after it is plucked
from a tree. This is similar also to the loss of Kirlian bioplasma field
from a dying leaf, as demonstrated by Krippner and Rubin in their book
The Kirlian Aura (page 197, Figure 84 of the 1974 Anchor Books
edition).
* http://www.orgonelab.org/lemeter.htm

Experiment 4: Measuring the Human Energy Field with the Large Plate
Electrode:

The Large Plate Electrode accessory allows for some interesting

experimentation. Be sure to adjust the toggle switch on the rear of the
instrument to the LARGE position.

One can lay the Large Plate Electrode flat on a smooth floor and have
people stand on it with the bare feet, or with socks, to make additional
comparisons. Or, it can be taped to a wall, where people can stand close
to it – again, the distance from the electrodes will change the readings,
so if you want to make meaningful comparisons, keep the distances
identical.

Using the Large Plate Electrode as taped to a wall, or carefully secured

in the vertical position in open air (suspending it from the ceiling with
string works well) one can then crank up the sensitivity to the 1000x or
2000x ranges. It will then pick up the human energy field from a much
greater distance, of around two meters (yards)!

Experiment 5: Variable Strengths of Orgone Energy Blankets

This experiment will demonstrate how a stronger charge is developed

from an orgone energy accumulating structure, the orgone blanket in this
instance, by increasing it’s layers or “plys”. For more information on
this subject, see The Orgone Accumulator Handbook (2010 edition is
best). http://www.orgonelab.org/cart/xdemeo#ORACBOOK

1. Obtain several yards of sheep’s wool felt or similar wool-cotton mix

blanket material (no synthetics), and cut 16 pieces measuring
approximately 4 inches (or 12 cm) square, about the same size as the
wood base of the Small Plate Electrode.

2. Obtain a quantity of steel wool of moderate to fine grade.

3. Set up the LEM as previously, using the 1x scale and wood Small
Plate Electrode, allowing to warm, and then zero.

4. Lay one layer of the wool felt on the small plate electrode. You will
note it hardly reacts. Then lay down a square swatch of steel wool
which is just a bit smaller size as the wool felt piece, and then another
layer of wool felt, to complete the creation of a primitive 1-ply orgone
blanket. The reading will now be up to around 8%.
5. Now lay down another series of sandwiched steel wool swatches and
wool felt swatches, one after another, until you have four layers of steel
wool sandwiched in between five layers of sheep’s wool felt. The
bottom and top-most layers will be composed of sheep’s wool felt. You
can compress them down with your hand. The readings, when your
hand is removed, will now be up to around 12%, for this primitive 4-ply
orgone blanket.

6. Repeat step 5, adding another four layers of steel wool and sheep’s
wool, to build up to an 8-ply orgone blanket. The reading will now
increase to around 15%.

7. Repeat step 5 again, building up to a 12-ply orgone blanket, which

will now increase the readings to around 18%.

These readings may vary depending upon weather or other factors, such
as how thick are the layers of fabric or steel wool layers you use. But if
you are consistent in the layerings, it should reproduce the basic effect,
which also shows that the number of layers or “plys” in construction of
an orgone blanket does not automatically yield a direct linear increase in
its charge. There is an increase in charge which suggests a plateau will
eventually be reached.

If you repeat this experiment using a 10-cm (4”) square of thin sheet
metal plate as the very first layer, and put that directly in contact with
the metal square of the Small Plate Electrode, the reactions are far
greater, showing around 25% right off. When the layerings of wool felt
and steel wool are now added, they show a proportionately greater
reading at the LEM, such that the 12-plys of fabric and steel wool
sandwiched together produces an overall additional 25% of reading,
pushing the total for the metal-plate plus 12-ply orgone blanket to a full
50% reading. These observations confirm the more general and
subjective observations of Reich and others, that
a) increasing the plys of an orgone blanket or accumulator does not
produce any simple arithmetic increase in the strength of its radiant
orgone field, or its bio-effects; and
b) the box-type orgone accumulator with an interior composed of
metal plate produces a stronger radiant field than an orgone blanket of
an equal number of layers or plys.
More Challenging Experiments: Quantitative Differences of
Life-Energy Charge in Liquids and Fruits, and Other Items.

We now turn to more experimental tests requiring greater care and

laboratory skills, to measure the life-energy fields of living and non-
living materials in a more quantitative manner. These should be
attempted only after one has mastered the more simple experiments, and
knows how and under what conditions the instrument will react.

To get meaningful results from the LEM, for comparisons of different

samples or objects, you have to standardize the volume and/or the mass,
and in some cases the moisture content of the material being evaluated.

General Notes on Higher-Sensitivity and Liquids Measuring

Liquids measuring is most challenging, so we recommend to study and

test out the following methods as a first step on this subject.

Using Higher Sensitivity Ranges and “zeroing at 50%”: If you

measure two objects at 10x and the differences are negligible, say 80%
versus 82%, you will observe that by increasing the sensitivity to 100x,
those same samples now cannot be measured at all by zeroing the meter
at the “zero” mark. But there is a work-around, by adjusting the meter
at 100x to the 50% mark with one of the samples on the Small Plate
Electrode, you can then compare the readings when the second sample is
measured. This gives the difference in readings, though it remains
somewhat “uncontrolled” for any larger kind of evaluations.

Zeroing with a “blank”: For higher sensitivities, at 100x, one can

prepare a “blank” object which gives a reaction somewhat similar to the
liquids or fruits one is measuring, but which itself will not change in
moisture or material composition over time. We have heard different
reports on what works best, so some experimentation will be necessary.
An empty glass vial is useful as a blank for zeroing against similar vials
containing liquids of different composition. The liquids will then drive
the LEM to read at a higher level, but you will have subtracted the
influence of the container. Or, a screw-top vial filled with distilled
water, and sealed, can be used as a zeroing blank against other liquid
samples of identical quantity in similar sealed vials, zeroing at 50% in
those cases. In a few cases, a small metal or ceramic object can be used
as a blank, allowing one to set the LEM to an excitation level which then
allows for good comparative results between two liquids.

Avoidance of Table-Top Effects: At 100x and above, the LEM becomes

highly reactive such that zeroing the instrument becomes problematic --
one cannot even use the fingers to adjust the zero knobs without the
instrument reacting. Leaning over the instrument will create a reaction.
And depending upon the material composition of the table-top, one can
often cause a reaction in the instrument merely by putting one’s hands
on the table even at a great distance. In these cases, some
experimentation is necessary to insulate the instrument and the Small
Plate Electrode from the table top. We have found that thick sheets of
cork insulation will do this, as will an ordinary closed-up and empty
cardboard box. Zeroing with the fingers may then become slightly
easier, but one may still have to adjust the LEM to something like 20%,
anticipating it will fall back to zero once the fingers are removed. Or, to
adjust at 70% with a fall-back to 50%.

Tip! In those cases where a person or sample drives the LEM off-scale
at the 1x or 10x, but then yields too little on the higher sensitivity
selections, you can decrease the sensitivity of the Small Plate Electrode
by putting down a layer of thin paper or cardboard. The Vacuum Tube
Electrode can also be decreased in sensitivity by making making a small
round tube of similar paper-cardboard material. This material does not
react significantly to the LEM, but provides a bit of “insulation” and
dead-air space which can help in making more difficult measures.
Experiment 6: Comparisons of Fruits and Vegetables

A large fruit or vegetable will yield a stronger reading than a small one
of identical species, in nearly all cases. When they are of nearly the
same size and species, and from the same tree or orchard, the readings
will be of generally the same magnitude but not exactly so. Given the
many variables involved, such as moisture content, different species, or
even the vitality of different trees which only the farmer could about,
special control procedures may become necessary to make accurate or
meaningful determinations.

1. Use the LEM on a flat table surface, turn on and warm using the
Small Plate Electrode and zero as usual.

2. Compare different fruits or vegetables, cutting them to appropriate

sizes so as to get good readings at the 10x or 100x settings. Note how
larger samples give higher readings than smaller ones, generally. Also
how fresh fruits of high moisture yield higher readings than dried fruits
or root vegetables of lower moisture content.

These variations in weight and moisture should be studied and known,

as a first step before attempting to control them out of the experiment,
after which the life-energy parameters could be studied. If one wishes to
test between different varieties of agricultural methods, for example bio-
organic fruits and vegetables as opposed to chemically fertilized and
pesticide-sprayed factory samples, then one must apply more demanding
and controlled experimental methods.

The Cut-Weight Method: Cut similarly shaped and size slices of the
fruit, and standardize their weight by use of a sensitive scale, cutting a
bit off the heavier of the samples until the weight readings are close to
identical. They can then be measured on the LEM more meaningfully.
Two samples alone may not suffice, however, so for good scientific
procedure, a group of ten samples from each of the two groups –
bioorganic versus chemical grown for example – should be used. Re-
zero the LEM after each reading, if necessary.

The Juicing Method: Because different samples may have different

moisture contents, the cut-weight method may not work in all cases.
Instead one can draw a sample of juice from the fruits or vegetables in
question. Be sure to use identical methods for extracting the juice, and
wash the juicer between the sample groups. Catch the juice in glass
containers only, and then portion off identical quantities of juice into
identical small containers for measuring at the LEM. Don't expect too
much here, maybe 5% to 15% difference for the same kind of juice or
liquid. Natural Energy Works sells special non-reactive glass-vials and
plastic beakers for such liquids experiments. Experiments are also
underway at Heliognosis towards development of a specific hybrid
electrode, for direct immersion into the sample, like a pH electrode. See
the notes also on Liquids Measuring, as given above.

Experiment 7: Comparisons of Different Water Samples

Much has been said about living water versus dead water, the subject of
water structure or activation chemistry. We have preliminary
indications this can be studied by use of the LEM, and that at least some
of this parameter is an expression of the life-energy as it charges up the
water. For this type of experiment, one must have a good laboratory
with other test equipment so as to make the most rigorous of control
procedures.

1. Set up the instrument on a table-top, warmed and using the Small

Plate Electrode at 100x. Zero at 50% using the methods described
above, using a distilled water blank filled to the top in sealed glass vials
of about 10ml volume – Natural Energy Works sells these as an
accessory to the meter.

2. At this setting different water samples of identical volume will

usually yield different readings. We have found that our good and
healthy mountain well water yields about a 5% to 10% higher reading
than distilled water purchased in plastic containers at the grocery store.
Re-zero the instrument frequently, and be aware of the role of your
hands in the measures!

3. One can rule out the role of electrical conductivity in the mineralized
water samples by adding a small bit of NaCl table salt into the distilled
water sample. Use a conductivity meter and add sufficient salt to the
distilled water so it has a conductivity identical to the well-water sample.
This particular salt control measure reduced the differences between the
well and distilled samples by a small amount, indicating that the LEM
readings can be influenced by conductivity parameters. However, a
difference of 3% to 8% persisted, in our experience. This demonstrated
the water drawn from the earth carried an innate charge, detected by the
LEM, which was not present in the distilled sample, even when the
parameter of conductivity was controlled out of the experiment.
Grounding the two water samples with a wire for some period, so as to
eliminate electrical potential differences, does not eliminate this factor.

These liquids measuring methods are still under experimental review, as

there is much unknown about how the contact of commercial water or
juices with metal or plastic containers and components might change its
character – just as we know from purchase of items in the grocery store,
which are never quite as good as getting them fresh from the farm. We
have seen some good indications, however, between for example organic
orange juice and non-organic orange juice of similar expiration dates.
But not always so. The number of variables involved is so great as to
require a great caution in interpretation of results.

This is why we emphasize the word “Experimental” in the descriptive

literature.
Experiments with the 1000x and 2000x Ranges

The higher sensitivity ranges of 1000x and 2000x are fully experimental
in nature. They have limited uses for most applications, but do provide
some interesting readings when set up with a computer and DAQ system
for long-term recording. For these experiments, it is advised to set up
the instrument and electrode in a location where it will not be perturbed
by people walking by. It should be monitored and adjusted for the initial
period to insure the zeroing is proper for changing environmental
parameters, and that it won’t be simply driven off-scale.
Summary and Comparisons to Other Measuring Devices

Taken together, all these kinds of readings with the LEM as discussed or
shown above, appear functionally identical to the life-energy charge of
the object or person.

Some generalized experiments with millivoltmeters, as noted above

using the method of Harold Burr* for "electrodynamic field" measures,
suggest similar variations, and highlight the changing nature of
creatures, tissues, and the background field of the Earth itself -- which
in turn affects all living and non-living objects. As a dynamical property
which varies by time of day, weather conditions and lunar cycle, as well
as the location where the instrument is placed and used, the demands for
control procedures with the LEM – particularly for more demanding
experiments -- are therefore greater than for the usual static laboratory
phenomenon.
* http://www.orgonelab.org/cart/xlifenergy.htm

Personally speaking, I consider the LEM to be somewhat analogous to

the very first pH meters. They were also reactive to the human field of
the operator, fussy about the location where they were used, and picked
up the dynamic field changes given how they have a millivoltmeter at
their core. Over the years, they became increasingly sensitive and useful
for a wide variety of purposes. At present, Marett is continuing research
with the instrument for a method to exclude or reduce the secondary
reactions of the LEM to metals and water alone. New versions of his
LEM will then be introduced commercially. The existing LEM is
nevertheless the only instrument which can demonstrate the presence of
the life-energy field with a constant measure and sustained reading,
without the usual fall-off back to zero, as seen in sensitive
millivoltmeters due to motional electrical fields alone. It is an analog
meter yielding quantitative results parallel to the Korotkov/Kirlian
energy-field imaging devices. It is not reactive to standard electricity --
static or EM -- and functions by creating its own very isolated resonant
field, which is affected by and measured when other objects or living
substance are placed within that field.

NOTE: Do not introduce electrostatic charges into the LEM electrodes!

This can damage the instrument.

Using classical electronics terminology, the LEM might be described as

amperage variations in the “displacement current” of the electrodes,
which is variable according to the "permittivity" of the objects which are
brought near to it. However, these classical electronics terms can hardly
be considered as meaningful, given how they merely provide a name --
“permittivity” and “displacement current” -- to phenomena and material
properties which otherwise are not well understood in any depth. Why
for example a healthy and vital working person has a stronger charge in
their hands as opposed to an intellectual person, or why one hand shows
more charge than the other in the same person, or why healthy life-
giving water and fruits are slightly higher charged than devitalized ones.

It is also not clear that the LEM readings are comparable to what
homeopathic physicians or radionics experimenters are observing.
Those kinds of readings appear more qualitative in nature, as opposed to
the quantitative parameter of energy charge. Much remains to be
clarified in this respect, and for these reasons we do not offer the LEM
as any kind of diagnostic instrument, even for such things as
comparative kinesiology testing. But we certainly do encourage
experimentation and good scientific research study of the LEM’s
possibilities.
For More Information:

We encourage people to review all the details as given at the Natural

Energy Works selling page for the LEM, as given here:
http://www.orgonelab.org/cart/ylemeter.htm
And here is another webpage providing details on some of the same
experiments given above, plus a few new ones:
http://www.orgonelab.org/lemeter.htm
Be sure to also read the Manual that comes with the meter.

Contact:

Natural Energy Works

Ashland, Oregon, USA
http://www.naturalenergyworks.net
http://www.orgonelab.org/cart/ylemeter.htm
http://www/orgonelab.org/lemeter.htm

Helignosis Canada
http://www.heliognosis.com