Literature Review
Literature Review
Literature Review
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 GENERAL
In residential systems where land cost is at a premium, any savings in floor area
will be of considerable advantage both in terms of cost of the construction of floor and
better utilization of materials. With this in view, some of the innovations which are
prevalent in the basement floors for parking purpose in order to overcome land / space
scarcity, are use of steel in columns for reduction in area compared to concrete and
use of steel-concrete composites offsetting some of the costs in using steel completely.
Generally columns in high rise buildings are larger in size when concrete is used and
occupy more space cutting into the floor / carpet area of the apartment resulting in
more cost. Concrete Filled Steel Tubular (CFST) composite columns represent a class
of structural systems, where the best properties of steel and concrete are used to their
maximum advantage. When employed under favourable conditions the steel casing
confines the core tri-axially creating a confinement for better seismic resistance and
the in-filled concrete inhibits the local buckling of the tubular shell. Tubular columns
have an advantage over spirally reinforced concrete columns in which the core and the
cover behave as two different layers. In reinforced concrete columns, the cover is
inferior to the core and the spiral reinforcement come into action until the cover spalls.
Whereas in the concrete filled steel tubular columns the core forms one continuous
homogeneous medium. Also in slender tubular columns, where buckling occurs before
the concrete is confined, the shell adds to the strength. Tubular columns, when
considered as reinforced concrete columns, represent columns with a well dispersed
reinforcement. Ties and spirals could be avoided and tubes themselves form the
shuttering.
2
The compressive strength per unit cost of concrete is higher than that of structural
steel and so, it seemed to be the most suitable material for use in columns. Until the
1950s, it was normal practice to use a wet mix of low strength concrete and to neglect
the contribution of the good quality concrete to the strength of the column. Tests by
Faber (1956), Stevens (1959) and others then showed that savings could be made by
using better-quality concrete and designing the column as a composite member. This
empirical method was developed by stages from earlier design procedures for steel
columns, and is not based on fundamental research on composite columns. In the mid
1980s several buildings constructed at Seattle in USA became well known for their
use of concrete filled steel tubes. Many developed countries like USA, Japan,
Germany, Singapore, Australia, Canada, Belgium etc., adopt this kind of composite
sections to facilitate speedy construction. Because of the increased use of composite
columns, many experimental and theoretical research works have been carried out to
study the strength and behaviour of the CFST columns. Rational methods of designing
CFST columns have also been developed.
1.2 OBJECTIVES
1.3 SCOPES
CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
Lin-Hai Han, Wei Li, and Reidar Bjorhovde (2014) summarized and
discussed the research development on CFST structural members in most recent years,
particularly in China. The characteristic of these concrete-filled steel tubular members
is that the structural properties can be improved due to the “composite action” between
steel tube and filled concrete. Basic design approaches from various countries and
some typical applications of concrete-filled steel tubular members in buildings,
bridges and other structures are presented and compared. The concrete-filled steel
tubular structure can be treated as an alternative system to the steel or the reinforced
concrete system. Some questions on the feasibility of the CFST system should also be
fully evaluated for its widely expanded application. The thorough comparison of
advantages and disadvantages of the CFST system with the steel and RC system, the
space truss structural system, the connection system, the hybrid systemusing high
performance and sustainable materials aswell as the life-cycle performance evaluation
should be conducted in the future.
concluded that in today‟s scenario, when green buildings have become the focus of
designers, CFST structures can be a better alternative to traditional structures of
concrete and steel structures due to their abundant advantages.
specimens was 6%, for double-layered 12%. This increase in strength is explained by
appearance of additional interaction between neighboring concrete layers under
loading conditions.
Lanhui Guoa et al (2007) studied the occurrence of local buckling in bare steel
and concrete-filled tubes and how different depth-to-thickness ratios affect the
response of the steel component. Specimens with values of depth-to-thickness ratios
in the range of 50–125 have been considered. The experiments were conducted using
a 1000kN capacity compression machine. They observed that the initial stiffness is
nearly identical for both bare and concrete-filled steel tubes, and the grease has well
eliminated the bond and load transfer between the steel and concrete components. For
the same column size, the peak load reached by a concrete-filled section is
significantly greater than that observed for the corresponding steel one. These
differences become particularly evident for specimens with high depth-to-thickness
ratio. In fact, for specimens with a depth-to-thickness ratio of 50, the bearing capacity
observed for concrete-filled tubes is 23% higher than the one measured for bare hollow
steel tube. For larger depth-to-thickness ratios, an enhancement of 75% was observed.
Tao et al. (2005) tested nineteen specimens, including thirteen square CFT stub
columns, two rectangular CFT stub columns and four empty square steel stub columns
for reference. They were tested to failure under concentric compression. All tubes
were manufactured from mild steel sheet with a measured thickness of 2.5 mm. A
5000 kN capacity testing machine was used for the compression tests of all specimens.
The adjustment was terminated until the difference between the measured strain and
the average value was not more than 5%. In addition, two displacement transducers
were used to measure the axial shortening during the tests. A load interval of less than
one tenth of the estimated load capacity was used. Each load interval was maintained
for about 2 to 3 minutes. They concluded that when compared with the steel columns,
the ultimate strength of the composite columns was greatly increased because of the
in-filled concrete. In the case of un-stiffened composite columns, the load carrying
capacity of specimen under estimates could be observed. The sectional capacity of the
composite stub columns could be increased when stiffeners were provided. And also,
no ductility improvement for stiffened CFT columns was observed in the current test.
The increment of moment of inertia of stiffeners did not significantly influence the
ductility of the stiffened CFT specimens.
curvature bending. All the columns were tested in a compressive testing machine with
a maximum load capacity of 10000 kN. A set of adapter end plates equipped with half-
spherical bearings were manufactured and fixed to both ends of each column to form
a simply supported column. The main parameters studied were the length of the
composite column and the concrete strength. The L/D ratio varied from 12.5 to 25.0.
The author concluded that the increase of the concrete core strength was effective for
shorter columns and decreased with the increase of the composite column length. All
axially loaded columns failed after having reached the steel yield strain with small
lateral mid-length deflections.
CHAPTER 3
METHODOLOGY
11
CHAPTER 4
COLUMN SPECIFICATION
4.1 GENERAL
The specification of the column specimen that is used in the project work is
given below.
CHAPTER 5
SOFTWARE ANALYSIS
5.1 GENERAL
The ANSYS Workbench environment is an intuitive up-front finite element
analysis tool that is used in conjunction with CAD systems and/or DesignModeler.
ANSYS Workbench is a software environment for performing structural, thermal, and
electromagnetic analyses. The class focuses on geometry creation and optimization,
attaching existing geometry, setting up the finite element model, solving, and
reviewing results. The class will describe how to use the code as well as basic finite
element simulation concepts and results interpretation.
ANSYS is a general purpose software, used to simulate interactions of all disciplines
of physics, structural, vibration, fluid dynamics, heat transfer and electromagnetic for
engineers.
ANSYS can import CAD data and also enables to build a geometry with its
"pre-processing" abilities. Similarly in the same pre-processor, finite element model
(a.k.a. mesh) which is required for computation is generated. After defining loadings
and carrying out analyses, results can be viewed as numerical and graphical.
ANSYS can carry out advanced engineering analyses quickly, safely and
practically by its variety of contact algorithms, time based loading features and
nonlinear material models.
Parts define the geometry of the individual components of your model and, therefore,
are the building blocks of an ANSYS model.
14
15
You define the properties of a part through sections. After you create a section, you
can use one of the following two methods to assign the section to the part in the current
viewport
• You can simply select the region from the part and assign the section to the selected
region.
• You can use the Set toolset to create a homogeneous set containing the region and
assign the section to the set.
5.3.4 SOLVING
19
After the application of load the model solved for the required results and the failure
mode of the model is obtained
CHAPTER 6
CONCLUSION
This study presents the construction friendly structural system Laced Steel
Concrete composite (LSCC) that possess high ductility, after analyzing the limitations
of other systems. The LSCC beams with lacings of vertical and inclined angle of
60degree are subjected to four point flexure loading using analytical software. The
finite element model with solid, plates and link elements representing the concrete,
cover plates and lacings respectively is generated and analysed for the calculated
ultimate load carrying capacity. The deformation and stress- strain characteristics were
obtained as results. It is shown that the cover plates and the lacing provided prevents
the concrete from spalling, which is major limitations of other existing systems.
22
REFERENCES
[1] Lin-Hai Han et. al (2014), Developments and advanced applications of concrete-
filled steel tubular (CFST) structures: Members, Journal of Constructional Steel
Research 100 (2014) 211–228
[2] Beena Kumari (2018), Concrete Filled Steel Tubular (CFST) Columns in
Composite Structures, IOSR Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering
(IOSR-JEEE), Volume 13, Issue 1 Ver. II (Jan. – Feb. 2018), PP 11-18
[3] Aizhu Zhu et. al (2017), Experimental study of concrete filled cold-formed steel
tubular stub columns, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 134 (2017) 17–27
[4] A.K.H. Kwan et. al. (2016), Axial and lateral stress–strain model for concrete-
filled steel tubes, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 122 (2016) 421–433
[5] Lucky Rebecca Joseph et. al. (2014), Structural Biomimicry – Evolving an
Efficient Column, International Journal of Advanced Research in Civil, Structural,
Environmental and Infrastructure Engineering and Developing, Volume: 1 Issue: 3
08-Apr-2014,ISSN_NO: 2320-723X
[7] Qing Quan Liang (2015), Analysis and Design of Steel and Composite
Structures, International Standard Book Number-13: 978-1-4822-6653-5 (eBook -
PDF)