Copy First Phase Report MS
Copy First Phase Report MS
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
The beam column joint is the crucial zone in a reinforced concrete moment
resisting frame. It is subjected to large forces during severe ground shaking and
its behaviour has a significant influence on the response of the structure.
Over the years, various methods for resisting the seismic load have been
explored with regards to materials, geometry and design. In the recent years, a
new branch has been observed to have caught the attention of various
researchers, which is “Concrete filled steel tubes”, under this category,
experimentation with shear studs has shown a lot of promise with respect to
load carrying capacity and ductility.
Although this research has a progressive trend, it has been focused on being used
as columns and beams. It has been proven by plenty researchers that these
members successfully increase the ultimate load carrying capacity and ductility as
compared to the traditional RCC members thus confirming the fact that, these
members can be effectively used in cyclic loading conditions. As it is known that
the „Beam Column joint‟ is the most critical portion and likely to fail during a
seismic loading of the structure, thus in this study we combine these two concepts
and explore the combined effect of steel encased beam column joints.
Here, in this study the spacing of shear connectors is varied and the changes in
the results for the same load increments were observed and compared for each
specimen. Furthermore, the same models were constructed in ANSYS and were
given the same loads. The results from the analytical study and experimental
observations were compared and results were drawn.
2
CHAPTER 2
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
In this paper six square hollow steel specimen of 2mm thickness and dimension
of 400x100x100mm were filled with M25 grade and tested. The effect of shear
connectors distribution and behavior of thin walled short concrete-filled steel
tube (CFT) columns were subjected to axial load and studied. Graphs for 6
specimens were plotted and maximum load carrying capacity and deformation
were studied and compared with specimen with different specimen of shear
connectors. Based on experimental analysis and theoretical study on the
checkered steel-encased concrete composite beam it was found that checkered
pattern substantially improve the bonding effect between steel beam and
concrete and prevents buckling, confinement of steel to concrete enhances the
core concrete strength and closer the shear connectors higher will be the
strength capacity.
used in this paper have potential to improve the ductility of the stiffened stub
columns to some extent.
This paper aims to investigate the flexural behavior of concrete filled tubes
(CFSTs) made of seamless steel which can handle more pressure than welded
steel. In this paper 9 specimens were tested, of which 6 were CFST & 3 were
hollow tubes, of diameter/thickness ratio 7.82, 13.5, 17.5. All CFST beam
specimens failed in a ductile mode and no local buckling was observed in any of
the specimens. The moment capacity of the CFST beam specimens increased as
5
compared to empty beams (STs). However, this increase was more significant
for higher D/t ratios. CFST section with low D/t ratio behaves more like a bare
steel section and the contribution of the concrete in fill to the flexural capacity
would be very small or negligible. The moment results obtained from the
experimental program were also compared with well-known international
design codes such as the AIJ, AISC, BS540 and the Eurocode4 as well as with
the theoretical values predicted by Han's equation.
Summary:
As evident from the literature survey, CFSTs with shear studs have higher load
carrying capacity and better ductility. Furthermore, it is observed that there is a
research gap in the field of CFST beam column joint.
7
CHAPTER 3
OBJECTIVES
This project focuses on the application of steel encased concrete frame with
shear connectors at different spacing. It is expected that the ductile properties
observed in steel encased frames would also be applicable to the joints.
Since, during the literature survey it was found that, there was no previous
research on steel encased beam column joint and frames, this study focuses on
the same to fill the research gap that was observed. It is also predicted that this
type of construction will enhance the safety of the structure during an
earthquake while evacuation, thus making this arrangement advantageous for
seismic prone areas. These objectives can be summarised as follows,
CHAPTER 4
MATERIALS USED
C = 394kg/m3
= 0.125m3
10
Volume of water = x
=197m3
Zone II for M-sand (As per IS Code 383:1971 Table 4 page 11)
= 1152 kg
For column,
m2 For beam,
؞Total length of rod required combined for all the specimens = 19.71m
13
CHAPTER 5
EXPERIMENTAL METHODOLOGY
As mentioned above, the variable parameters in this study were the spacing of
shear connectors, which was 75mm, 100mm and 125mm. These spacing were
decided based on the Eurocode – 4 which specifies the minimum spacing of 6D
and maximum spacing of 25D (where D is the diameter of the shear connector).
All the steel used for this study was mild steel. The steel plate was 1.2mm thick;
this was done to reduce the percentage of steel used and make the specimen as a
„Thin walled structure’. Fig 5.1 shows the general geometry of all the three
specimens.
As shown in the figures 5.2(a & b), the steel casing was made into a C-shape
first such that one face of the specimen is open, this was done for the ease to
weld the internal shear rods, once the shear rods were welded in place, a rod
14
was placed in the beam with development length of it going into the columns.
Then the open face was closed by welding a steel plate. This steel plate was also
connected with inner shear rods via welding as well. The steel plate was welded
fully along the edges to ensure maximum strength as well as to avoid concrete
slurry spillage while filling.
Fig 5.2 (a): Bent mild steel sheets Fig 5.2 (b): Welded shear connectors
As shown in Fig 5.2(c), the specimen was open only on the bottom surface of
the columns; this opening was used for the filling of concrete and curing of
concrete too.
15
Once the steel mould was ready, a high workability M25 concrete confirming to
IS-10262:2009 and IS-456:2000 was poured from the column openings into the
steel encasement. The maximum aggregate size was 12mm, this size was used
to avoid blocking of the concrete due to aggregates getting stuck in spaces.
As shown in Fig 5.3 (a & b), the specimen was kept upside down and the
concrete was poured and the casing was tilted and manually shaken to help the
concrete to compact properly along with regular tamping with a 16mm rod.
16
These specimens were also provided with 16mm holes which were 50mm above
the opening on both the columns. These holes were later used to connect them
to the base plate for providing fixed support when the lateral load was given to
the specimen.
17
Two baseplates of mild steel was designed in accordance with IS-800:2007, the
loading frame and fabricated as per the design shown in Fig 5.6 ( a & b).
Fig 5.6 (a): Portal frames along with their control specimen
These baseplates had 20mm clearance in both the axes, to account for any
possible errors which could’ve been present in the specimen. Also, holes of
16mm diameter were made at 50mm from the base such that they coincide with
the holes in the columns.
18
Fig 5.7(a):Modified Front base plate Fig 5.7(b):Modified Rear base plate
The holes on the ‘cup’ had to be expanded to a diameter of 31mm to account for
the clearance for the specimen’s holes (Fig 5.7). This allowed for a better and
easier setting of the lateral bolts.
19
CHAPTER 6
The experiment was assembled in such (Fig 6.1) a way that the deflection could
be measured at the top surface of the specimen column and at the middle
surface of the specimen column.
LVDT-2
Clamp Deflection
indicator
A total of 3 specimens and their control specimens were cast and subsequently
tested.
20
No. of No. of
Spacing of studs Assigned Name
Specimens Control
75mm SP-75 1 1
100mm SP-100 1 1
125mm SP-125 1 1
The nature of loading which was static, since the loads were not given based on
time intervals. The test was carried out in a load control condition, i.e. the
deflection was observed for a given load. The rate of loading for each specimen
was at the increment of ±0.1 tonnes per cycle, where the loading capacity of the
loading frame was 50tonnes. All the connections were fixed at the beginning of
the experiment and the specimen was fastened to the baseplate and all the uplift
was arrested.
21
This was the first specimen to be tested; it had the shear connector’s spacing of
75mm. It encountered quite a few problems including uplifting of the specimen,
thus causing rotation. Also as it had lower spacing of shear connectors and due
to experimental difficulties, it could not be tested till its ultimate load capacity.
The hysteresis curve and the backbone curve for the loading cycles were plotted
as shown in Fig 6.3 and 6.4 (a).
22
As it can be seen from the Fig 6.3, that the graph gradually slips towards the x-
axis and it tested till the load of 2.7 tonnes with a corresponding deflection of
39.9mm.
23
The slipping of the hysteresis curve shows that the specimen was gradually
dissipating the energy via deformation. Similarly, the failure can be seen in Fig
6.4 (b).
This specimen was the second to be tested; and it had the shear connector’s
spacing of 100mm. This specimen was tested till the failure point, i.e. ultimate
load capacity of the specimen. Here, it was ensured that there would be no
uplift, thus it was possible to take better readings.
The hysteresis curve and the backbone curve for the loading cycles were plotted
as shown in Fig 6.6 and 6.7 (a).
25
As it can be seen from the Fig 6.6, that the graph gradually slips towards the x-
axis and it tested till the load of 1.4 tonnes with a corresponding deflection of
46.6mm.
26
The slipping of the hysteresis curve shows that the specimen was gradually
dissipating the energy via deformation. Similarly, the failures can be seen in Fig
6.7 (b & c).
This specimen was the second to be tested; and it had the shear connector’s
spacing of 125mm. This specimen was tested beyond the failure point, i.e.
beyond ultimate load capacity of the specimen. Due to testing beyond failure
point it was possible to see the degradation behaviour.
The hysteresis curve and the backbone curve for the loading cycles were plotted
as shown in Fig 6.9 and 6.10(a).
28
As it can be seen from the Fig 6.6, that the graph gradually slips towards the x-
axis and it tested till the load of 1.4 tonnes with a corresponding deflection of
12.3mm.
The slipping of the hysteresis curve shows that the specimen was gradually
dissipating the energy via deformation. From the back-bone curve we can infer
that the ultimate load carrying capacity of the specimen is 3.8 tonnes.
Correspondingly, the failures can be seen in Fig 6.10 (b).
CHAPTER 7:
ANSYS MODELLING AND SIMULATION
7.1. MODELLING AND DEFINING PARAMETERS
Once assembly was completed, the file was saved as a „.step‟ file, which was
then imported into ANSYS 18.1. In ANSYS, the static structural model was
chosen and non-linear concrete properties and non-linear structural steel
properties were given. Then these properties were assigned to their respective
parts in the geometry.
For all the specimens, a face was made in the virtual topography to correspond
to the loading face of the experiment. All the loads were applied on this face;
similarly the bottom faces of both the columns were fixed, again to simulate the
experiment as closely as possible.
In all the cases, the loading increment was kept more than the experiment, i.e.
±0.2tonnes per cycle, this was done to reduce the processing time and obtain
results relatively quickly. For all these cases the total and directional
displacement as well as Von-Mises stress was plotted.
The displacement results were plotted for all the specimens, and it showed non-
linearity which closely resembled the experimental values.
75mm + cycle
Ansys
Load
Deflection
(kN)
(mm)
0 0
2 1.25
4 2.5
6 4.16
8 4.64
10 6.4
12 7
14 8.9
16 10.1
18 12.97
20 13.9
Fig 7.2(a): Deflection model of SP-75
Table 2: ANSYS
Load VS Deflection
data for SP-75
32
100mm + cycle
Ansys
Load
Deflection
(kN)
(mm)
0 0
2 1.1
4 2.1
6 3.7
8 3.8
10 7.4
12 8.4
14 31.1
16 109
125mm + cycle
Ansys
Load
Deflection
(kN)
(mm)
0 0
2 1.1
4 2.1
6 3.73
8 3.8
10 7.3
12 8.2
14 27
Fig 7.2(c): Deflection model of SP-125 Table 4: ANSYS Load VS
Deflection data for SP-125
33
Fig 7.3(a): Equivalent stress model of Fig 7.3(b): Equivalent stress model
SP-75 of SP-100
As seen in the Fig 7.3, when compared to actual failure, we can infer that the
analytical models provide a correct approximation.
34
CHAPTER 8:
COMPARISON OF RESULTS
All the three specimens were not tested till failure, thus we need to curtail at
certain load to have an accurate comparison. Here in Fig 8.1, we see a
comparison of the backbone curves of all the 3 specimens where the curtailment
is assumed to be at -2 tonnes.
In the above fig 8.1with respect to the negative loads we can observe that, the
area under each curve is in ascending order, which confirms the fact that lesser
shear connector spacing increases the ductility of the specimen. Thus it can also
be said that with increase in shear connector spacing the specimen gets more
brittle.
35
A sudden slip in experimental data is observed here, the reason for this is
attributed to the rotation during the loading, thus causing for this error. Once the
graph is corrected and shifted to its supposed position, the readings are
agreeable with the analytical results.
It was found that the corrected graph and the analytical graph had a difference
of approximately 8%.
36
Here, the readings were approximately similar with each other, and they follow
similar failure behaviour.
It was found that the experimental graph and the analytical graph had a
difference of approximately 8%.
37
Here, the readings are approximately similar with each other, and they follow
similar failure behaviour.
It was found that the experimental graph and the analytical graph had a
difference of approximately 10%.
38
CHAPTER 9:
CONCLUSIONS
5. The member takes load even after the concrete inside is crushed
which could be observed from the load cells and LVDTs.
APPENDIX I:
REFERENCES
[1] Li-hua Chen, Shu-ting Li, Hong-yang Zhang, Xiao-feng Wu, Experimental
study on mechanical performance of checkered steel-encased concrete
composite beam, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 143 (2018) 223 –232
[3] Zhong Tao, Lin-Hai Han, Dong-Ye Wang, Strength and ductility of
stiffened thin-walled hollow steel structural stub columns filled with concrete,
Thin-Walled Structures 46 (2008) 1113-1128
[4] Shuai Li, Lin-Hai Han, Chao Hou, Concrete-encased CFST columns under
combined compression and torsion: Analytical behaviour, Journal of
Constructional Steel Research 144 (2018) 236 –252