Fidic User Guide Final (Romania) PDF
Fidic User Guide Final (Romania) PDF
Fidic User Guide Final (Romania) PDF
April 2007
April 2007
DISCLAIMER:
The content of this report is the sole responsibility of the Framework Contractor and can in
no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union.
Prepared LHM
Checked Andreea Toma/Alexis Gressier
Approved Lars H. Møller
.
Romania, Transposition of the FIDIC Clauses of Contract in the Romanian Language 1
Employer User Guide for Particular Conditions of Contract
Table of Contents
Table of Appendices
Appendix A - PC's for the FIDIC Red Book
Appendix B - PC's for the FIDIC Yellow Book
Appendix C - PC's for the FIDIC Green Book
Appendix D - Templates for Guarantees
Appendix E - Templates for Contractual Issues
Appendix F - DAB Agreements
Abbreviations
ANRMAP National Authority for Regulating and Monitoring Public Procurement
ARIC Romanian Association of Consulting Engineers
BCEOM French consulting company
CFCU Central Finance and Contracts Unit
CN ADNR SA National Company for Motorways and National Roads
CONS Conditions of Contract for Construction
COWI Danish consulting company
CV Curriculum Vitae
DAB Dispute Adjudication Board
EC European Commission
EPC Engineering, Procurement, Construction
EPCT Conditions of Contract for EPC/Turnkey Projects
ERDF European Regional Development Fund
EU European Union
EUR Euro
FIDIC Fédération International des Ingénieurs-Conseils
GD Government Decision
GEO Government Emergency Ordinance
GO Government Ordinance
ICC International Chamber of Commerce
ISC State Inspectorate in Construction
ISPA Instrument for Structural Policies for Pre-Accession
MA Infra Managing Authority for Infrastructure, MPF
MEI Ministry of European Integration
MPF Ministry of Public Finance
MTCT Ministry of Transport, Construction and Tourism
OGR Official Gazette of Romania
P&DB Conditions of Contract for Design-Build
RBA Romanian Bank Association
RCC Romanian Chamber of Commerce
RON Romanian Leu
TOR Terms of Reference
UNCITRAL United Nations Commission on International Trade Law
VAT Value added tax
1.1 Introduction
This Employer User Guide for Particular Conditions of Contract is prepared by
BCEOM, a member of the COWI Consortium, under the EuropeAid Benefici-
ary Framework Contract - Lot 2 - Transport and Infrastructure.
The Guide was prepared in response to the Terms of Reference under Letter of
Contract No. Rosu-13-ter dated 21st June 2006, signed by the CFCU on 13th
June 2006 and by the COWI Consortium on 12th July 2006.
Translation
A translation into the Romanian language was carried out - as Task 1 of above
Services Contract - during the period of August to December 2006. The transla-
tion included the General Conditions of Contract for the first 3 of the above 4
FIDIC documents, i.e. the FIDIC red, yellow, and green books.
The approved translations will be issued by the MPF for use on infrastructure
projects in Romania, after the publication in the Official Gazette of Romania.
The General Conditions of Contract will in due course be published in the Offi-
cial Gazette of Romania for use on infrastructure projects in Romania.
Templates
This Employer User Guide for Particular Conditions of Contract provides guid-
ance for Romanian employers for the preparation of particular conditions of
contract and for the Appendix to Tender.
The Guide provides:
• Clause-by-clause guidance for particular conditions of contract
• Templates for guarantees
• Templates for selected contractual documents.
The remaining parts of the standard tender documents shall not be covered by
this Employer User Guide on Particular Conditions of Contract.
1.5 Acknowledgements
The Consultants acknowledge the comprehensive assistance provided by the
Coordination Committee as well as the Working Group and the counterparts set
up by the MA Infra of the MPF.
The draft mandatory and additional particular conditions were discussed in de-
tail with the MA Infra counterparts and the Working Group, and later presented
for the Coordination Committee. A one-day workshop with all the stakeholders
took place on 6th December 2006 in Bucharest.
The above mentioned GEO No. 34/2006 transposes into Romanian legislation
the relevant provisions of the European Directive No. 18/2004/CE defining the
overall procurement rules and procedures for the entire European Union.
Furthermore, the tender dossier and the Contractor’s proposal have no value
after the signature of the Contract, unless they are explicitly incorporated as
part of the Contract documents. It is therefore recommended to seriously con-
sider which documents should form part of the Contract.
It should also be noted that a particular tender procedure ends after the signa-
ture of the related contract (or after the cancellation of the procedure). There-
fore, in case a contract is terminated, it is not legally possible to revert to the
second ranked tenderer of the original procedure.
The Forms of Contract are recommended by FIDIC for general use, where the
tenders are invited on an international basis. Modifications may be required in
some jurisdictions, particularly if the Conditions are to be used on domestic
contracts. FIDIC considers the official and authentic texts to be the versions in
the English language.
If the price for the contract is relatively small (say under EUR 500,000) or the
construction time is short (say less than 6 months), or the work involved is rela-
tively simple or repetitive (dredging work might be a good example), then con-
sider using the Short Form of Contract, irrespective of whether the design is
provided by the Employer or the Contractor, and of whether the project in-
volves construction, electrical, mechanical, or other engineering work.
4.1 Introduction
This chapter provides guidance for the preparation of the Particular Conditions
of Contract and the Appendix to Tender for Works Contracts using the FIDIC
Conditions of Contract for Construction, 1st Edition 1999, i.e. the FIDIC Red
Book.
The FIDIC General Conditions of Contract were translated into Romanian lan-
guage in August to November 2006, and was submitted to the MPF in Decem-
ber 2006.
Mandatory and additional particular conditions of contract for the FIDIC Red
Book, necessary as to harmonise the contract provisions with the current Ro-
manian legislation, were prepared in October 2006 to January 2007, and was
submitted to the MPF in January 2007.
The Romanian language version of the General Conditions of Contract and the
proposed mandatory and additional particular conditions will, after approval by
the MPF, be published in the Official Gazette of Romania for use on infrastruc-
ture projects in Romania.
This Guide comprises guidance and proposals for the proposed mandatory and
additional particular conditions of contract.
The General Conditions and the Particular Conditions will together comprise the
Conditions of Contract governing the rights and obligations of the parties. It will
be necessary to prepare the Particular Conditions for each individual contract,
and to take account of those sub-clauses in the General Conditions which men-
tion the Particular Conditions.
For this publication, the General Conditions of Contract were prepared on the
following basis:
• Interim and final payments will be determined by measurement, applying
the rates and prices in a Bill of Quantities
• If the wording in the General Conditions necessitates further data, then
(unless it is so descriptive that it would have to be detailed in the Specification)
the sub-clause makes reference to this data being contained in the Appendix to
Tender, the data either being prescribed by the Employer or being inserted
by the Tenderer
• Where a sub-clause in the General Conditions deals with a matter on which
different contract terms are likely to be applicable for different contracts, the
principles applied in writing the sub-clause were:
a) Users would find it more convenient if any provisions which they did
not wish to apply could simply be deleted or not invoked, than if addi-
tional text had to be written (in the Particular Conditions) because the
General Conditions did not cover their requirements; or
b) In other cases, where the application of (a) was thought to be inappro-
priate, the sub-clause contains the provisions which were considered
applicable to most contracts.
Where example wording is amended, and in all cases where other amendments or
additions are made, care must be taken to ensure that no ambiguity is created,
either with the General Conditions or between the clauses in the Particular
Conditions. It is essential that all these drafting tasks, and the entire preparation
of the tender documents, are entrusted to personnel with the relevant expertise,
including the contractual, technical and procurement aspects.
This publication concludes with example forms for the Letter of Tender, the Ap-
pendix to Tender (providing a check-list of the sub-clauses which refer to it), the
Contract Agreement, and alternatives for the Dispute Adjudication Agreement.
This Dispute Adjudication Agreement provides text for the agreement between
the Employer, the Contractor and the person appointed to act either as sole ad-
judicator or as a member of a three-person dispute adjudication board; and in-
corporates (by reference) the terms in the Appendix to the General Conditions.
In addition, FIDIC has published a contracts guide to the use of its Conditions
of Contract for Construction, for Plant and Design-Build, and for EPC/Turnkey
Projects.
4.2.1 Introduction
The Conditions of Contract for Construction - the FIDIC Red Book - have been
prepared by FIDIC and are recommended for general use for the purpose of the
construction (excluding most design) of building or engineering works where
tenders are invited on an international basis.
Under the usual arrangements for this type of contract, the Contractor con-
structs the works in accordance with design details provided by the Employer
or his representative, the Engineer. Although these Conditions allow for the
possibility that the Contractor may be required to design parts of the permanent
works, they are not intended for use where most of the works are designed by
the Contractor. For these Works, it would be more appropriate to utilise
FIDIC's Conditions of Contract for Plant and Design-Build or Conditions of
Contract for EPC/Turnkey Projects.
Where example wording is amended, and in all cases where other amendments
or additions are made, care must be taken to ensure that no ambiguity is cre-
ated, either with the General Conditions or between the clauses in the Particular
Conditions.
The tender documents issued to tenderers will consist of the Conditions of Con-
tract, the Specification, the Drawings, and the Letter of Tender and Schedules
for completion by the Tenderer.
For this type of contract, where works are valued by measurement, the Bill of
Quantities will usually be the most important Schedule. A Daywork Schedule
may also be necessary, to cover minor works to be evaluated at cost.
In addition, each of the Tenderers should receive the data referred to in Sub-
Clause 4.10, and the Instructions to Tenderers to advise them of any special
matters which the Employer wishes them to take into account when pricing the
Bill of Quantities but which are not to form part of the Contract.
When the Employer accepts the Letter of Tender, the Contract includes these
completed Schedules.
The Specification
The Specification may include the matters referred to in some or all of the fol-
lowing sub-clauses:
- 1.8 Requirements for Contractor's Documents
- 1.13 Permissions being obtained by the Employer
- 2.1 Phased possession of foundations, structures, plant or means of access
- 4.1 Contractor's designs
- 4.6 Other contractors (and others) on the Site
- 4.7 Setting-out points, lines and levels of reference
- 4.14 Third parties
- 4.18 Environmental constraints
- 4.19 Electricity, water, gas and other services available on the Site
- 4.20 Employer's Equipment and free-issue material
- 5.1 Nominated Subcontractors
- 6.6 Facilities for Personnel
- 7.2 Samples
- 7.4 Testing during manufacture and/or construction
- 9.1 Tests on Completion
- 13.5 Provisional Sums.
The Employer may require other data from Tenderers, and include a question-
naire in the Schedules.
dence and work permits, permits for radio communication, permits to relo-
cate public utilities, etc.
The Employer will wish the leader of the joint venture to be appointed at an
early stage, providing a single point of contact thereafter, and will not wish to
be involved in a dispute between the members of a joint venture. The Employer
should scrutinise the joint venture agreement carefully, and it may have to be
approved by the project's financing institutions.
“The Contractor shall treat the details of the Contract Agreement as private
and confidential, except to the extent necessary to carry out his obligations
there under or to comply with applicable Laws. The Contractor shall not pub-
lish, permit to be published, or disclose any particulars of the Works in any
trade or technical paper or elsewhere without the prior written agreement of
the Employer.”
In case right of access and possession will be granted only for limited sections
and/or for limited duration (such as in the case of rail rehabilitation works), the
Employer should state this and define the procedure that will be applied as well
as the main constraint/parameters.
The Site does not include additional working areas that the Contractor might
require, as defined under Sub-Clause 4.23. However, in the particular case of
temporary diversions specifically required by the Employer (for example in the
case of bridge works), the required land should be made available by the same
Employer.
The work to be carried out by these other contractors should be described in the
tender documents, and aspects such as co-ordination and safety may need to be
specified.
It has to be noted that this Sub-Clause plays its role mainly when large costs
overruns are occurring (including due to Contractor’s claims), as Employers are
generally expected to have secured funding corresponding to the Accepted
Contract Amount before the signature of the contract.
It is clear that the Engineer has the role defined in very general terms in Article
21 paragraph d) of Law No. 10/1995. However, the Conditions of Contract
provide for several additional duties and authority.
Employers might wish to limit the authority of the Engineer, in order to main-
tain control on some of the main features. Such limitations should (i) be spe-
cifically detailed in the Particular Conditions and (ii) truly correspond to those
mentioned in the Engineer’s contract.
Attention of the Employers is drawn on the fact that such prior approval trans-
fer responsibility from the Engineer to the Employer.
Therefore, under the Contract, the designer or other entities are not to issue in-
structions directly to the Contractor.
“The Engineer or the Contractor’s Representative may require the other to at-
tend a management meeting in order to review the arrangements for future
work. Such meetings shall take place on a monthly basis. The Engineer shall
record the business of management meetings and supply copies of the record to
those attending the meeting and to the Employer, within two working days from
the meeting. In the record, responsibilities for any actions to be taken shall be
in accordance with the Contract.
The agenda for such meetings shall cover a review of progress attained, a re-
view of schedules and plants for future activities, the status of staffing, engi-
neering, safety, equipment, material supply, payments, current and anticipated
difficulties, interface with other Contractors, claims for extras, and other perti-
nent topics. Time and place of these meetings shall be mutually agreed taking
into consideration the subject to be discussed.”
count of the type of this item of Temporary Works, and of the extent of the
Employer's responsibility.
In case the Contractor is required to provide design of part of the Works, this
should be clearly stated, normally in the Specifications. It is important to state
the extent of such design work and whether it is relating to full design of a spe-
cific part (including Temporary Works, relocation or protection of utilities, etc)
or to an increased level of detail (for example production of working drawings
for the Permanent Works). In both cases, Employers should specify:
- Whether and to what extent the Engineer’s consent on the name and
qualifications of the designer (individuals, sub-contractor, etc) and de-
sign checkers shall be obtained. This might also include definition of
possible conflict of interest (with the Employer’s Personnel, including
the Engineer’s personnel)
- Whether, to what extent and in which time period and according to
which sequence, design shall be submitted by the Contractor and ap-
proved or reviewed by the Engineer and / or the Employer. Attention
is drawn to cases where the Employer’s Technical-Economic Commit-
tee’s approval would be required
- Whether and to what extent authorisations and permits are required
and which Party is responsible to obtain them.
In case the Contractor is to fully design a part of the Works, Employers might
consider integrating additional provisions, similar to those of Clause 5 of the
conditions of contract for plant and design-build, providing a better definition
of the design procedure.
“The design by the Contractor shall form a coherent technical project together
with the Specifications and Drawings provided by the Employer in the Con-
tract. In case the Contractor’s design proposes substantial changes to the Em-
ployer’s design (including but not limited to changes of technical solutions),
such proposal shall be deemed to have been made by the Contractor under
Sub-Clause 13.2 [Value Engineering].”
The value of the Performance Security is normally based on the Accepted Con-
tract Amount. As per the provisions of Article 89 paragraph (2) of GD No.
925/2006, it cannot exceed 10% of the Contract Price VAT excluded. For large
projects with possibly important cost-overruns, it is recommendable to add the
following text at the end of this Sub-Clause.
“Whenever the Engineer determines that the Contract Price exceeds the Ac-
cepted Contract Amount or the Contract Price previously determined for the
purposes of this Sub-Clause, by more than ten (10%) percent, the Contractor,
at the Engineer’s written request, shall promptly increase the value of the Per-
formance Security by an equal percentage.”
In case the Employer is not prepared to accept another form of security than the
one annexed to the Particular Conditions, it should amend the second sentence
of the second paragraph of Sub-Clause 4.2 as follows:
“The Performance Security shall be issued by an entity and from within a coun-
try (or other jurisdiction) approved by the Employer, and shall be in the form
annexed to the Particular Conditions.”
The role of the Contractor’s Representative should be highlighted. Not only his
nomination, but also his revocation has to receive the prior consent of the Engi-
neer.
Please also note that, according to the same Article 96(2) of GD No. 925/2006,
replacement of Subcontractors nominated in the Tender must not lead to modi-
fication of the initial technical or financial offer of the Contractor.
“The Contractor shall not subcontract a larger value of the Works than the
maximum specified in the Appendix to Tender.”
“Such prior consent shall not be required if the value of the subcontract is less
than one percent (1%) of the Contract Price.”
The traffic management plan shall indicate what measures will be implemented
to manage the traffic while Works are underway. Such plan shall describe, in
the form of a sketch accompanied by narrative details, the sequence of signs,
deviations, lighting, fence, etc, to be applied to each section of road with differ-
ent cross profile characteristics (2, 3 or 4 lanes), so that road users and ripar-
ian be protected. The traffic management plan shall be approved by the Engi-
neer before the start of the Works on any part of the Site.”
Approval by the Engineer will be granted only further to the approval by the
Road Police and by the Employer’s specialised services.
the Contractor of the Cost of remedy measures or any higher amount depending
on actual damages.
“The Contractor shall use for the execution of the Works Equipment of not
lower quality and capacity than the Equipment proposed in the Tender and
listed in Schedule xx to the Contract.”
“In case of default on the part of the Contractor in meeting the requirements of
the present Sub-Clause, the Employer shall be entitled, subject to Sub-Clause
2.5, to payment by the Contractor of the Cost of remedy measures or any
higher amount depending on actual damages.”
In case Employers intend to use this Sub-Clause, for use of Employer’s Equip-
ment or of free issue materials, they should be very careful so as to ensure fair
and transparent conditions of competition. The exact conditions and prices for
Equipment should be detailed and disclosed to all tenderers, while detailed in-
formation regarding the quality and quantity of free issue materials, as well as
the time and place where they will be made available should be defined. It is
advisable to have those materials surveyed as part of the tender, so as to define
their condition and suitability for use.
In case the condition of free issue materials is not known before the execution
of the Works (for example when some materials are to be re-used), Employers
should ensure that all tenderers base their prices on the same assumptions and
that the mechanism for incorporation of such materials does not distort compe-
tition.
The provisions of the present Sub-Clause should be adapted from one project to
another in function of the configuration of the Site.
At the Engineer’s request, the Contractor has to provide all necessary informa-
tion for the daily completion of the works diary and attachments.
The information provided is noted in the works diary and attachments, signed
by the Contractor’s Representative and countersigned by the Engineer or his
representative. The Contractor shall be responsible to ensure that adequate
back-up of this information is provided.
The Employer should require Tenderers to indicate in the Tender the fact that
obligations related to labour conditions and labour safety were taken into con-
sideration in the preparation of the Tender.
In some cases, requests of the Contractor to work outside the normal working
hours will have an impact on the activity of and required inputs from the Engi-
neer. This can be limited with:
“The personnel of the Contractor will not be allowed to perform the Works in
more than one shift, except for those activities requiring continuous presence
on Site, such as traffic management.”
“The Contractor shall also be liable for all payments or compensation, if any,
levied in relation to the dumping of part or all of such materials, waste piles,
debris and hazardous waste.”
“The design, the Contractor's Documents, the execution and the completed
Works shall comply with the Country's technical standards, building, construc-
tion and environmental Laws, Laws applicable to the product being produced
from the Works, and other standards specified in the Specifications, applicable
to the Works, or defined by the applicable Laws.
All these Laws shall, in respect of the Works and each Section, be those pre-
vailing when the Works or Section are taken over by the Employer under
Clause 10 [Employer's Taking Over]. References in the Contract to published
standards shall be understood to be references to the edition applicable on the
Base Date, unless stated otherwise.
If changed or new applicable standards come into force in the Country after the
Base Date, the Contractor shall give notice to the Engineer and (if appropriate)
submit proposals for compliance. In the event that:
a) the Engineer determines that compliance is required, and
b) the proposals for compliance constitute a variation,
Failure of the Employer to provide access to and possession of the Site in due
time might delay the Commencement Date and have serious consequences. It is
highly recommended not to sign any contract before compliance with Sub-
Clause 2.1 and Sub-Clause 8.1 is ensured.
In case Employers know that the Commencement Date for a part of the Works
will be delayed, it is advisable to define this part as a Section (in the Appendix
to Tender) and to define under the present Sub-Clauses different Commence-
ment Dates by Sections.
On the other hand, the last sentence defines strong obligations for the Contrac-
tor. For example, the Contractor should not stop the Works if it is able to work
on part of the Works.
“Such revised programme shall be submitted within 21 days from the date of
the Engineer’s notice. Failure to comply with this provision shall entitle the
Employer, subject to Sub-Clause 2.5, to payment of damages by the Contrac-
tor.”
In case the Contractor incurs delays in the achievement of a milestone, the Em-
ployer will be entitled, subject to Clause 2.5, to withhold from the Interim Pay-
ment Certificates an amount equal to 0.05% of the Accepted Contract Amount
per day of delay, up to a maximum of 10% of the Accepted Contract Amount.
The amount so withheld shall be paid to the Contractor, if and when the mile-
stone is reached. Any remaining monies so withheld shall be paid upon the is-
sue of the Taking-Over Certificate for the Works.
It is also mentioned that these delay damages are the only damages due for such
default (late completion), except in the event of termination by the Employer.
This tends to restrict the constitution of “black lists” or other similar instru-
ments.
The usual practice is to limit the total amount of delay damages at a maximum
of 15% of the final Contract Price. For contracts where completion of the
Works by a certain date is of paramount importance, it might be envisaged to
(i) introduce a higher amount of delay damages, but also (ii) introduce a bonus
for acceleration.
It should also be noted that Employers might, in duly justified cases, waive
their rights to delay damages, or suspend the actual payment of such damages
by the Contractor until the completion of the Works, for example in case pay-
ment of such damages would create strong pressures on the Contractor’s cash
flow and would jeopardize the actual completion of the Works.
The role of the Engineer in the taking-over commission is not defined. Unless
expressly forbidden by the Law, it might be recommendable that the Engineer
be nominated as representative of the Employer.
It remains for Employers and Engineers to agree on what exactly means “minor
outstanding work and defects which will not substantially affect the use of the
Works or Section for their intended purpose”.
The last sentence of this Sub-Clause is of importance and introduces the princi-
ple of “non-retroactivity”.
A new paragraph needs to be added at the end of this Sub-Clause reflecting the
obligation for the Contractor to comply with Romanian public procurement
regulations when purchasing Plant, Materials or services other than from a
nominated Subcontractor. The relevant wording is included in the mandatory
particular conditions in Appendix A1.
“The Tender and subsequently the Contract Amount shall have been based on
the Contractor’s projections for inflation over the implementation period. Thus
the Contract Price shall not be subject to any adjustment due to inflation, rise
or fall in the cost of labour, materials or any other matters affecting the execu-
tion of the Contract. Cases provided by Clause 13.7 are not subject to this re-
striction.”
It should be noted that the proposed formula applies only for works performed
after the changes occurred (so it applies for what “remains to be executed” in
accordance with provisions of GD No. 925/2006). Actually the multiplier is
calculated for the works performed during month n.
Cost-plus contracts, under which the actual Costs are determined and paid, are
unusual and only used when (for reasons of urgency or otherwise) the Em-
ployer is willing to accept the risks involved. If the Contractor is to be paid ac-
tual Costs, Clause 12 should be replaced by provisions describing the method
of determining the Costs and Contract Price. As a result, the provisions in the
General Conditions which entitle the Contractor to payment of additional Costs
will generally be of no effect.
Lump sum contracts may be suitable if the tender documents include details
which are sufficiently complete for construction and for Variations to be
unlikely. From the information supplied in the tender documents, the Contrac-
tor can prepare any other details necessary, and construct the Works, without
having to refer back to the Engineer for clarification or further information.
forms may be more appropriate: see FIDIC's Conditions of Contract for Plant
and Design-Build or Conditions of Contract for EPC/Turnkey Projects.
For a lump sum contract, the tender documents should include a schedule of
payments (see Sub-Clause 14.4), and any drawings required for construction
may be specified as being Contractor's Documents. The Specification should
describe the procedures under which the Contractor submits these Documents
for the Engineer to approve.
“Any Statement under this Sub-Clause shall be signed by the Contractor’s Rep-
resentative duly appointed in accordance with Sub-Clause 4.3. In case a State-
ment is not signed by the duly appointed Contractor’s Representative, such
Statement shall be void and ineffective.”
tenderers would have to price each object. It is however preferable that the
“weight” of each sub-phase be defined in the tender documents.
It has to be noted that the Employer is not entitled to modify any Payment Cer-
tificate, but in case of arithmetical mistakes. Any other claim of the Employer
has to be made in accordance with the procedure defined in Sub-Clause 2.5. It
also has to be noted that, in case the Employer considers that an undue payment
has been made, he can also include in his claim the related financing costs. The
scope of those provisions is to ensure that an adequate flow of cash is main-
tained.
The financing charges for amount/s receivable not paid on the due date shall be
the interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its principal refi-
nancing operations, as published in the C series of the Official Journal of the
European Communities, in force on the first calendar day of the month in
which the due date falls, increased by three and a half percentage points.
“The Contractor may request the payment of retention money against the sub-
mission to the Employer of a bank guarantee. In such case, the Engineer shall
certify and the Employer shall make payment to the Contractor of the amounts
related to Retention Money, after he obtains such guarantee, in a form and pro-
vided by an entity approved by the Employer, in amounts and currencies equal
to the payments to be made. The Contractor may gradually increase the amount
of the bank guarantee, in accordance with the estimates submitted under Sub-
Clause 14.4 [Schedule of Payments]. The amount of the bank guarantee shall
however be equal to the limit of Retention Money stated in the Appendix to
Tender when the total of all certified interim payments (excluding the advance
payment and deductions and repayments of retention) exceeds seventy per cent
(70%) of the Accepted Contract Amount less Provisional Sums.
The Contractor shall ensure that the guarantee is valid and enforceable until
the Contractor has executed and completed the Works and remedied any de-
fects, as specified for the Performance Security in Sub-Clause 4.2. The release
of the guarantee shall be in lieu of the release of the second half of the Reten-
tion Money under the second paragraph of Sub-Clause 14.9, while the Contrac-
tor shall be entitled, when the Taking-Over Certificate has been issued for the
Works, to a reduction of the amount of the bank guarantee corresponding with
the first half of the Retention Money."
on the first day of the month in which the time-limit expired, plus three and a
half percentage points. The default interest shall be incurred over the time
which elapses between that date of the payment deadline set by the Employer
(exclusive), and the date on which payment is actually made (inclusive). Any
partial payments shall first cover the interest thus established.
Financing Arrangements
For major contracts in some markets, there may be a need to secure finance
from entities such as aid agencies, development banks, export credit agencies,
or other international financing institutions. If financing is to be procured from
any of these sources, the Particular Conditions may need to incorporate its spe-
cial requirements. The exact wording will depend on the relevant institution, so
reference will need to be made to them to ascertain their requirements, and to
seek approval of the draft tender documents.
The following examples indicate some of the topics which the institution's re-
quirements may cover:
a) Prohibition from discrimination against the shipping companies of any one
country;
b) Ensuring that the Contract is subject to a widely-accepted neutral law;
c) Provision for arbitration under recognised international rules and at a neu-
tral location;
d) Giving the Contractor the right to suspend/terminate in the event of default
under the financing arrangements;
e) Restricting the right to reject Plant;
f) Specifying the payments due in the event of termination;
g) Specifying that the Contract does not become effective until certain condi-
tions precedent have been satisfied, including pre-disbursement conditions
for the financing arrangements; and
h) Obliging the Employer to make payments from his own resources if, for
any reason, the funds under the financing arrangements are insufficient to
meet the payments due to the Contractor, whether due to a default under the
financing arrangements or otherwise.
In addition, the financing institution or bank may wish the Contract to include
references to the financing arrangements, especially if funding from more than
one source is to be arranged to finance different elements of supply. It is not
unusual for the Particular Conditions to include special provisions identifying
different categories of Plant and specifying the documents to be presented to
the relevant financing institution to obtain payment. If the financing institution's
requirements are not met, it may be difficult (or even impossible) to secure
suitable financing for the project, and/or the institution may decline to provide
finance for part or all of the Contract.
However, where the financing is not tied to the export of goods and services
from any particular country but is simply provided by commercial banks lend-
ing to the Employer, those banks may be concerned to ensure that the Contrac-
tor's rights are very restricted. These banks may wish the Contract to exclude
any reference to the financing arrangements, and/or to restrict the Contractor's
rights under Clause 16.
14.4), with the Instructions to Tenderers specifying the criteria with which the
Tenderer should comply. Since the Contractor would then have to arrange his
own financing to cover the shortfall between the payments and his outgoings,
he (and his financing bank) would probably require some form of security,
guaranteeing payment when due.
It may be appropriate for the Employer, when preparing the tender documents,
to anticipate the latter requirement by undertaking to provide a guarantee for
the element of payment which the Contractor is to receive when the Works are
complete. The acceptable form(s) of guarantee should be included in the tender
documents, annexed to the Particular Conditions: an example form is annexed
in Appendix D2.
It should be noted, in the first place, that termination of the Contract is a failure,
both for the Contractor and for the Employer. In real terms, Employers would
often lose considerable time (including valuation, organisation of a new tender,
etc.) and might support significant additional costs in order to complete the
Works. Therefore, termination under this Sub-Clause should be used as a last
resort. Moreover, the notice period should be used to initiate negotiations and
remedy measures. In such cases, the Employer may postpone the termination
notice, so as to allow such negotiations to develop. “Rushing into termination”
would in any case be a mistake. In particular, the fact that the Contractor is in
one of the situations described in this Sub-Clause as causes for termination
should not be understood as necessarily triggering termination.
It is possible to insert the following text within the last paragraph after the sec-
ond sentence:
“If the Contractor fails to remove his Equipment and Temporary Works within
21 days after receiving the notice, the Employer will be entitled to use so much
of the Contractor’s Equipment and Temporary Works which have been deemed
to be reserved exclusively for the execution of the Works, under the provisions
of the Contract, as he may consider proper, up to the completion of the respec-
tive Works.”
“The Contractor shall take full responsibility for the care of the items detailed
below, from the respective dates of use or occupation by the Contractor, up to
the respective dates of hand-over or cessation of occupation (where hand-over
or cessation of occupation may take place after the date stated in the Taking-
Over Certificate for the Works):
[Insert details]
If any loss or damage happens to any of the above items while the Contractor is
responsible for their care, arising from any cause whatsoever other than those
for which the Employer is liable, the Contractor shall, at his own cost, rectify
the Loss or damage to the satisfaction of the Engineer.”
The wording in the General Conditions describes the insurances which are to be
arranged by the "insuring Party", who is to be the Contractor unless otherwise
stated in the Particular Conditions. Insurances so provided by the Contractor
are to be consistent with the general terms agreed with the Employer. The In-
structions to Tenderers may therefore require tenderers to provide details of the
proposed terms.
If the Employer is to arrange any of the insurances under this Clause, the tender
documents should include details as an annex to the Particular Conditions (so
that tenderers can estimate what other insurances they wish to have for their
own protection), including the conditions, limits, exceptions and deductibles;
preferably in the form of a copy of each policy. The Employer may find it diffi-
cult to effect the insurances described in the third paragraph of Sub-Clause 18.2
(for Contractor's Equipment, which includes Subcontractor's equipment), be-
cause the Employer may not know the amount or value of these items of
equipment.
The Engineer shall, in turn, respond within 42 days after receiving a claim or
further particulars.
Although Sub-Clause 20.1 appears to say that any claim notified more than 28
days after the event can be dismissed without consideration, this is not the way
that many DABs are interpreting the clause. Most DAB decisions have allowed
a number of claims rejected for late notice to proceed. DABs have in mind that
the object of Clause 20.1 is to prevent ambushes and minimise delays to pro-
jects, not to bar meritorious claims. The result is that Employers have been sig-
nificantly disadvantaged in the DAB process by the fact that Engineers, acting
in all good faith, have not ensured that the necessary records are kept, have not
advised on the merits and have not prepared considered determinations. Guid-
ance as to how the notice provisions should be applied in the best interests of
Employers, good project administration and fairness under the contracts.
1. Where the Engineer considers that the 28-day notice provision of Clause
20.1 may not have been complied with, he should consider the following
before rejecting the claim:
i. Is the event one which, leaving aside Clause 20, is capable of being the
basis for a valid claim?
ii. Did the Employer or the Engineer in fact know about the event giving
rise to the claim within 28 days of the event?
iii. Is the event giving rise to the claim an action or inaction by the Em-
ployer or the Engineer?
iv. Was the Employer or the Engineer aware within 28 days that a claim
was probable, or should they have been so aware?
v. Is it possible that the Contractor only considered himself entitled to
make a claim – as distinct from knowing about the event – within the 4
weeks prior to the notice?
vi. Has the timing of the notice caused the Employer or the Engineer any
significant prejudice in terms of the ability to mitigate or record the ef-
fects of the event?
vii. Has the timing of the notice benefited the Contractor or does it seem as
if it was intended to benefit the Contractor?
viii. Was there communication, whether at meetings or otherwise, about the
problem, other than by way of formal notice?
ix. Is it fair and reasonable, taking into account all of the above, to reject
the claim without consideration of the merits?
2. If the answer to item (i) is that the event is not capable of being a valid
claim, the Engineer should consider rejecting the claim on its lack of valid
basis.
3. If the answer to item (i) is yes, Engineers should consider items (ii) to (iv).
If the answer to any of these items is yes, then DABs are likely to be sym-
pathetic to the Contractor.
4. Next, consider item (v). DABs are taking notice of the first sentence of
Clause 20.1: it has been argued and accepted that if the Contractor has not
in fact considered himself entitled to claim, then the obligation to notify has
not arisen. Some events might require some investigation and advice before
a contractor decides that he has a claim. One DAB decided that the “cir-
cumstance” had not arisen until after a reasonable time for investigation. If
it is probable that the Contractor would have considered himself entitled to
claim more than 4 weeks before the notice, then rejection for lack of notice
should be considered.
5. Consider items (vi) and (vii). If there appears to have been a failure to no-
tify, has there been prejudice to the Employer or benefit to the Contractor?
In other words, would the cost or delay claimed have been reduced if earlier
notice had been given?
6. Consider item (viii). DABs do not insist that the notice is formal. If the is-
sue is raised at meetings or in general correspondence in due time, then this
is likely to be treated as adequate notice.
7. Finally, consider point (ix) and, in particular, whether any prejudice to the
Employer could be evaluated in financial terms under Clause 2.5 or in time
and deducted from any cost or time determined.
8. Promptly upon receipt of a claim and before rejecting a claim on notice
grounds, the Engineer should report to the Employer on its proposed action,
setting out its responses to the above questions. Advise whether:
a) The claim may reasonably be rejected for lack of notice;
b) The claim may reasonably be rejected for lack of notice but the Em-
ployer should nevertheless examine the merits due to the risk that the
DAB might disagree; or
c) Whether the claim should be dealt with on its merits.
It has to be noted that appointment of the DAB might not be opportune for all
contracts. There are two basic possibilities:
- Appointment of a DAB from the beginning of the Contract
- Pre-arbitral decision by the Engineer.
Unless the Engineer (although appointed by the Employer) is to make the pre-
arbitral decisions under this Clause 20, in accordance with the alternative op-
tion described below, the Contract should include the provisions under Clause
20 which, whilst not discouraging the Parties from reaching agreement on dis-
putes as the works proceed, allow them to refer contentious matters to an im-
partial dispute adjudication board.
The adjudication procedure depends for its success on, amongst other things,
the Parties' confidence in the agreed individual(s) who will serve on the DAB.
Therefore, it is essential that candidates for this position are not imposed by
either Party on the other Party; and that, if the individual is selected under Sub-
Clause 20.3, the selection is made by a wholly impartial entity. FIDIC is pre-
pared to perform this role, if this authority has been delegated in accordance
with the example wording in the Appendix to Tender.
It is preferable, but not essential, for the individual(s) to be agreed before the
Contract Agreement is concluded, and for the DAB to visit the Site on a regular
basis. Under the example text in the Appendix to Tender, the Parties may either
so agree before the Contract Agreement is concluded or agree the appointment
within the specified period thereafter. Alternatively, the Parties may prefer to
defer the appointment until a dispute has arisen, in which case Sub-Clause 20.2
plus the Appendix - General Conditions of Dispute Adjudication Agreement
with its Annex (Procedural Rules) and the Dispute Adjudication Agreement
should be amended to comply with the wording contained in the corresponding
sections of FIDIC’s Conditions of Contract for Plant and Design-Build.
Sub-Clause 20.2 provides for two alternative arrangements for the DAB:
a) One person, who acts as the sole member of the DAB, having entered
into a tripartite agreement with both Parties; or
b) A DAB of three persons, each of whom has entered into a tripartite
agreement with both Parties
The form of this tripartite agreement could be one of the two alternatives shown
in Appendix D2, as appropriate to the arrangement adopted. Both of these
forms incorporate (by reference) the General Conditions of Dispute Adjudica-
tion Agreement, which are included as Appendix to the General Conditions be-
cause they are also referred to in Sub-Clause 20.2. Under either of these forms
of Dispute Adjudication Agreement, each individual person is referred to as a
Member.
Typically, DAB is recommended for contracts of more than 5 million Euro and
DAB of 3 members for contracts of more than 100 million Euro.
For a one-person DAB to be mutually agreed, the Employer (or the tenderer)
could propose the names and curriculum vitae of suitable persons, for the ten-
derer (or the Employer) to accept. It may be advisable to propose alternates in
case some subsequently decline the appointment, assuming that they have not
previously indicated their willingness to accept. Each Party may be reluctant to
choose names from a list of people who have already been contacted by the
other Party.
For a three-person DAB, the Employer and the tenderer may each propose one
member, similar to the above procedure, for the tenderer and the Employer re-
spectively to accept. For the chairman, the Employer (or the tenderer) could
similarly propose suitable persons for the tenderer (or the Employer) to accept.
It may be appropriate for the chairman's retainer fee to be more than that of the
other two members, reflecting the additional administrative tasks which a
chairman will have to perform.
The appointment of the DAB may be facilitated, especially if the members are
not to be appointed at the commencement of the Contract, by including an
agreed list of potential members in the Contract: in a Schedule.
Alternatively, the Engineer may make these pre-arbitral decisions. This alterna-
tive, which has been the Engineer's traditional role in common law countries,
may be appropriate if the Engineer is an independent professional consulting
engineer with the experience and resources required for the administration of
all aspects of the contract. The Employer should recognise that, although the
Engineer generally acts for the Employer as specified in Sub-Clause 3.1(a), the
Engineer will make these pre-arbitral decisions impartially and the Employer
must not prejudice this impartiality. If this alternative is considered appropriate,
Sub-Clauses 20.2 and 20.3 should be deleted and Sub-Clause 20.4 should be
modified accordingly by deleting the second paragraph of Sub-Clause 20.4 and
substituting with:
“The Engineer shall act as the DAB in accordance with this Sub-Clause 20.4,
acting fairly, impartially and at the cost of the Employer. In the event that the
Employer intends to replace the Engineer, the Employer's notice under Sub-
Clause 3.4 shall include detailed proposals for the appointment of a replace-
ment DAB.”
“Unless settled amicably or through a DAB decision, any dispute arising out of
or in connection with the Contract, including without limitation any dispute
regarding its breach, termination or invalidity, shall be finally settled by inter-
national arbitration.”
Furthermore, Employers should carefully check the coherence between the ar-
bitral institution, the location, language and procedure of arbitration. For exam-
ple, the International Commercial Arbitral Court near the Romanian Chamber
of Commerce and Industry uses its own procedural rules. Employers are ad-
vised to link with the relevant arbitral institutions before defining such condi-
tions.
The Contract should include provisions for the resolution by international arbi-
tration of any disputes which are not resolved amicably. In international con-
tracts, international commercial arbitration has numerous advantages over liti-
gation in national courts, and may be more acceptable to the Parties.
If the UNCITRAL (or other non-ICC) arbitration rules are preferred, it may be
necessary to designate, in the Appendix to Tender, an institution to appoint the
arbitrators or to administer the arbitration, unless the institution is named (and
their role specified) in the arbitration rules. It may also be necessary to ensure,
before so designating an institution in the Appendix to Tender, that it is pre-
pared to appoint or administer.
For major projects tendered internationally, it is desirable that the place of arbi-
tration be situated in a country other than that of the Employer or Contractor.
This country should have a modern and liberal arbitration law and should have
ratified a bilateral or multilateral convention (such as the 1958 New York Con-
vention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards), or
both, that would facilitate the enforcement of an arbitral award in the states of
the Parties.
It may be considered desirable in some cases for other Parties to be joined into
any arbitration between the Parties, thereby creating a multi-party arbitration.
While this may be feasible, multi- party arbitration clauses require skilful draft-
ing, and usually need to be prepared on a case-by-case basis. No satisfactory
standard form of multi-party arbitration clause for international use has yet
been developed.
“The Contractor will allow the Romanian Audit Authority, the Romanian Anti-
Fraud Office, the European Commission, the European Anti-Fraud Office and
the European Court of Auditors to verify, by examining the documents or by
means of on-the-spot checks, the implementation of the project and conduct a
full audit, if necessary, on the basis of supporting documents for the accounts,
accounting documents and any other document relevant to the financing of the
project. These inspections may take place up to 7 years after the final payment.
Furthermore, the Contractor will allow the Romanian and European Anti-
Fraud Offices to carry out checks and verifications on-the-spot in accordance
with the procedures set out in the European Community legislation for the pro-
tection of the financial interests of the European Communities against fraud
and other irregularities.
The Contractor guarantees that the rights of the bodies mentioned under the
first paragraph of the present Clause to carry out audits, checks and verifica-
tion will be equally applicable, under the same conditions and according to the
same rules as those set out in this Clause, to any sub-contractor or any other
party benefiting from European Commission funds.”
Clause 6 Payment
Replace letter (c) of first paragraph by:
“a fixed per diem for expenses incurred in connection with the Member's du-
ties, for each overnight away from the Member’s home and covering the cost of
hotel, subsistence costs, local travel and other miscellaneous costs”
5.1 Introduction
This chapter provides guidance for the preparation of the Particular Conditions
of Contract and the Appendix to Tender for works contracts using the FIDIC
Conditions of Contract for Plant and Design-Build, 1st Edition 1999, i.e. the
FIDIC Yellow Book.
The FIDIC General Conditions of Contract were translated into Romanian lan-
guage in August to November 2006, and was submitted to the MPF in Decem-
ber 2006.
Mandatory and additional particular conditions of contract for the FIDIC Yel-
low Book, necessary so as to harmonise the contract provisions with the current
Romanian legislation, were prepared in October 2006 to January 2007 and was
submitted to the MPF in January 2007.
The Romanian language version of the General Conditions of Contract and the
proposed mandatory and additional particular conditions will, after approval by
the MPF, be published in the Official Gazette of Romania for use on infrastruc-
ture projects in Romania.
This Guide comprises guidance and proposals for the proposed mandatory and
additional particular conditions of contract.
The General Conditions and the Particular Conditions will together comprise the
Conditions of Contract governing the rights and obligations of the parties. It will
be necessary to prepare the Particular Conditions for each individual contract,
and to take account of those sub-clauses in the General Conditions which men-
tion the Particular Conditions.
For this publication, the General Conditions were prepared on the following
basis:
i. Interim payments, in respect of the lump sum Contract Price, will be
made as work proceeds, and will typically be based on instalments speci-
fied in a schedule
ii. If the wording in the General Conditions necessitates further data, then
(unless it is so descriptive that it would have to be detailed in the Em-
ployer's Requirements) the sub-clause makes reference to this data being
contained in the Appendix to Tender, the data either being prescribed by
the Employer or being inserted by the Tenderer
iii. Where a sub-clause in the General Conditions deals with a matter on
which different contract terms are likely to be applicable for different con-
tracts, the principles applied in writing the sub-clause were:
(a) Users would find it more convenient if any provisions which they
did not wish to apply could simply be deleted or not invoked, than if
additional text had to be written (in the Particular Conditions) because
the General Conditions did not cover their requirements; or
(b) In other cases, where the application of (a) was thought to be inap-
propriate, the sub-clause contains the provisions which were consid-
ered applicable to most contracts.
Where example wording is amended, and in all cases where other amendments
or additions are made, care must be taken to ensure that no ambiguity is cre-
ated, either with the General Conditions or between the clauses in the Particular
Conditions. It is essential that all these drafting tasks, and the entire preparation
of the tender documents, are entrusted to personnel with the relevant expertise,
including the contractual, technical and procurement aspects.
This publication concludes with example forms for the Letter of Tender, the Ap-
pendix to Tender (providing a checklist of the sub-clauses which refer to it), the
Contract Agreement, and alternatives for the Dispute Adjudication Agreement.
This Dispute Adjudication Agreement provides text for the agreement between
the Employer, the Contractor and the person appointed to act either as sole adjudi-
cator or as a member of a three-person dispute adjudication board; and incorpo-
rates (by reference) the terms in the Appendix to the General Conditions.
In addition, FIDIC has published a contracts guide to the use of its Conditions
of Contract for Construction, for Plant and Design-Build, and for EPC/Turnkey
Projects.
5.2.1 Introduction
The Conditions of Contract for Plant and Design-Build - the FIDIC Yellow
Book - have been prepared by the FIDIC and are recommended for general use
for the procurement (including design, manufacture, delivery and installation)
of plant, and for the design and execution of building or engineering works,
where tenders are invited on an international basis.
Under the usual arrangements for these types of contract, the Contractor is re-
sponsible for the design and provision, in accordance with the Employer's re-
quirements, of plant and/or building and/or engineering works.
Where example wording is amended, and in all cases where other amendments
or additions are made, care must be taken to ensure that no ambiguity is cre-
ated, either with the General Conditions or between the clauses in the Particular
Conditions.
The tender documents issued to tenderers will consist of the Conditions of Con-
tract, the Employer's Requirements, and the Letter of Tender and Schedules for
completion by the Tenderer.
In addition, each of the Tenderers should receive the data referred to in Sub-
Clause 4.10, and the Instructions to Tenderers to advise them of any matters
which the Employer wishes them to include in their Proposal but which do not
form part of the Employer's Requirements for the Works. The Contract will
then include the accepted Proposal and completed Schedules.
The Employer may require other data from Tenderers, and include a question-
naire in the Schedules.
Understandably, the tenderers are often reluctant, in the face of intense compe-
tition, to incur great expense in preparation of tender designs. When preparing
the Instructions to Tenderers, thought should be given as to the extent of detail
which tenderers can realistically be expected to prepare and include in their
tenders. The extent of detail required should be described in the Instructions to
Tenderers. Note that there can be no description in the documents which will
constitute the Contract.
“In these Conditions, provisions including the expression “Cost plus reason-
able profit” require this profit to be one-twentieth (5%) of the respective Cost.”
The Employer will wish the leader of the joint venture to be appointed at an
early stage, providing a single point of contact thereafter, and will not wish to
be involved in a dispute between the members of a joint venture. The Employer
should scrutinise the joint venture agreement carefully, and it may have to be
approved by the project's financing institutions.
“The Contractor shall treat the details of the Contract Agreement as private
and confidential, except to the extent necessary to carry out his obligations
there under or to comply with applicable Laws. The Contractor shall not pub-
lish, permit to be published, or disclose any particulars of the Works in any
trade or technical paper or elsewhere without the prior written agreement of
the Employer.”
In case right of access and possession will be granted only for limited sections
and/or for limited duration (such as in the case of rail rehabilitation works), the
Employer should state this and define the procedure that will be applied as well
as the main constraints / parameters.
The Site does not include additional working areas that the Contractor might
require, as defined under sub-clause 4.23. However, in the particular case of
temporary diversions specifically required by the Employer (for example in the
case of bridge works), the required land should be made available by the same
Employer.
The work to be carried out by these other contractors should be described in the
tender documents, and aspects such as co-ordination and safety may need to be
specified.
It has to be noted that this Sub-Clause plays its role mainly when large costs
overruns are occurring (including due to Contractor’s claims), as Employers are
generally expected to have secured funding corresponding to the Accepted
Contract Amount before the signature of the contract.
It is clear that the Engineer has the role defined in very general terms in Article
21 paragraph d) of Law No. 10/1995. However, the Conditions of Contract
provide for several additional duties and authority.
Employers might want to limit the authority of the Engineer, in order to main-
tain control on some of the main features. Such limitations should (i) be spe-
cifically detailed in the Particular Conditions and (ii) truly correspond to those
mentioned in the Engineer’s contract.
Attention of the Employers is drawn on the fact that such prior approval trans-
fers responsibility from the Engineer to the Employer.
“Notwithstanding the obligation, as set out above, to obtain approval, if, in the
opinion of the Engineer, an emergency occurs affecting the safety of life or of
the Works or of adjoining property, he may, without relieving the Contractor of
any of his duties and responsibilities under the Contract, instruct the Contrac-
tor to execute all such work or to do all such things as may, in the opinion of
the Engineer, be necessary to abate or reduce the risk. The Contractor shall
forthwith comply with any such instruction of the Engineer. The Engineer shall
determine an addition to the Contract Price, in respect of such instruction, in
accordance with Clause 13.1 and shall notify the Contractor accordingly, with
a copy to the Employer.”
“The Contractor shall only take instructions from the Engineer, or from an as-
sistant to whom the appropriate authority has been delegated under this
Clause.”
Therefore, under the Contract, other entities are not to issue instructions di-
rectly to the Contractor.
“The Engineer or the Contractor’s Representative may require the other to at-
tend a management meeting in order to review the arrangements for future
work. Such meetings shall take place on a monthly basis. The Engineer shall
record the business of management meetings and supply copies of the record to
those attending the meeting and to the Employer, within two working days from
the meeting. In the record, responsibilities for any actions to be taken shall be
in accordance with the Contract.
The agenda for such meetings shall cover a review of progress attained, a re-
view of schedules and plants for future activities, the status of staffing, engi-
neering, safety, equipment, material supply, payments, current and anticipated
difficulties, interface with other Contractors, claims for extras, and other perti-
nent topics. Time and place of these meetings shall be mutually agreed taking
into consideration the subject to be discussed.”
In order to avoid the risk of termination for failure by the Contractor to submit
the Performance Security, it is recommended to request submission of the Per-
formance Security at the signature of the Contract Agreement.
The value of the Performance Security is normally based on the Accepted Con-
tract Amount. As per the provisions of Article 89 paragraph (2) of GD No.
925/2006, it cannot exceed 10% of the Contract Price VAT excluded. For large
projects with possibly important cost-overruns, it is recommendable to add the
following text at the end of this Sub-Clause:
“Whenever the Engineer determines that the Contract Price exceeds the Ac-
cepted Contract Amount or the Contract Price previously determined for the
purposes of this Sub-Clause, by more than ten (10%) percent, the Contractor,
at the Engineer’s written request, shall promptly increase the value of the Per-
formance Security by an equal percentage.”
In case the Employer is not prepared to accept another form of security than the
one annexed to the Particular Conditions, it should amend the second sentence
of the second paragraph of Sub-Clause 4.2 as follows:
“The Performance Security shall be issued by an entity and from within a coun-
try (or other jurisdiction) approved by the Employer, and shall be in the form
annexed to the Particular Conditions.”
The role of the Contractor’s Representative should be highlighted. Not only his
nomination, but also his revocation has to receive the prior consent of the Engi-
neer.
Please also note that, according to the same Article 96 (2) of GD No. 925/2006,
replacement of Subcontractors nominated in the Tender must not lead to modi-
fication of the initial technical or financial offer of the Contractor.
“The Contractor shall not subcontract a larger value of the Works than the
maximum specified in the Appendix to Tender.”
“Such prior consent shall not be required if the value of the subcontract is less
than one percent (1%) of the Contract Price.”
As regards the second sentence of this Sub-Clause 4.5, details may be given as
to what would be considered as a reasonable objection.
The traffic management plan shall indicate what measures will be implemented
to manage the traffic while Works are underway. Such plan shall describe, in
the form of a sketch accompanied by narrative details, the sequence of signs,
deviations, lighting, fence, etc, to be applied to each section of road with differ-
ent cross profile characteristics (2, 3 or 4 lanes), so that road users and ripar-
ian be protected. The traffic management plan shall be approved by the Engi-
neer before the start of the Works on any part of the Site.”
Approval by the Engineer will be granted only further to the approval by the
Road Police and by the Employer’s specialised services.
“(b) Payment for any such Cost, per cent (….%) of which shall be included in
the Contract Price (the balance percent of the Cost shall be borne by the
Contractor).”
“The Contractor shall use for the execution of the Works Equipment of not
lower quality and capacity than the Equipment proposed in the Tender and
listed in Schedule xx to the Contract.”
“In case of default on the part of the Contractor in meeting the requirements of
the present Sub-Clause, the Employer shall be entitled, subject to Sub-Clause
2.5, to payment by the Contractor of the Cost of remedy measures or any
higher amount depending on actual damages.”
In case Employers intend to use this Sub-Clause, for use of Employer’s Equip-
ment or of free issue materials, they should be very careful so as to ensure fair
and transparent conditions of competition. The exact conditions and prices for
Equipment should be detailed and disclosed to all tenderers, while detailed in-
formation regarding the quality and quantity of free issue materials, as well as
the time and place where they will be made available should be defined. It is
advisable to have those materials surveyed as part of the tender, so as to define
their condition and suitability for use.
In case the condition of free issue materials is not known before the execution
of the Works (for example when some materials are to be re-used), Employers
should ensure that all tenderers base their prices on the same assumptions and
that the mechanism for incorporation of such materials does not distort compe-
tition.
The provisions of the present Sub-Clause should be adapted from one project to
another in function of the configuration of the Site.
“For the purposes of this Sub-Clause, the road users and riparian shall not be
considered as unauthorised persons in the normal use of the road and access to
riparian properties. Such use and access shall be regulated as part of the Con-
tractor’s traffic management plan.”
At the Engineer’s request, the Contractor has to provide all necessary informa-
tion for the daily completion of the works diary and attachments.
The information provided is noted in the works diary and attachments, signed
by the Contractor’s Representative and countersigned by the Engineer or his
representative. The Contractor shall be responsible to ensure that adequate
back-up of this information is provided.
The first paragraph of this Sub-Clause should be amended for the purposes of
compliance with Article 13 of Law No. 10/1995 related to the verification of
design by duly certified design checker; refer to the mandatory particular condi-
tions in Appendix B1.
Different "review periods" may be specified, taking account of the time neces-
sary to review the different types of drawing, and/or of the possibility of sub-
stantial submissions at particular stages of the design-build process.
“The Contractor shall employ key personnel as proposed in the Tender and
listed in Schedule xx to the Contract. Any replacement personnel shall be at
least of equivalent qualification and experience.”
The Employer should require Tenderers to indicate in the Tender the fact that
obligations related to labour conditions and labour safety were taken into con-
sideration in the preparation of the Tender.
In some cases, requests of the Contractor to work outside the normal working
hours will have an impact on the activity of and required inputs from the Engi-
neer. This can be limited with:
“The personnel of the Contractor will not be allowed to perform the Works in
more than one shift, except for those activities requiring continuous presence
on Site, such as traffic management.”
of this and of all other contracts which he may have entered into with the
Employer and also the payment of any loss or damage resulting from such
cancellation. Any amount paid shall be deducted from the Contractor's
payment due.”
“The Contractor shall also be liable for all payments or compensation, if any,
levied in relation to the dumping of part or all of such materials, waste piles,
debris and hazardous waste.”
Failure of the Employer to provide access to and possession of the Site in due
time might delay the Commencement Date and have serious consequences. It is
highly recommended not to sign any contract before compliance with Sub-
Clause 2.1 and Sub-Clause 8.1 is ensured.
In case Employers know that the Commencement Date for a part of the Works
will be delayed, it is advisable to define this part as a Section (in the Appendix
to Tender) and to define under the present Sub-Clauses different Commence-
ment Dates by Sections.
On the other hand, the last sentence defines strong obligations for the Contrac-
tor. For example, the Contractor should not stop the Works if it is able to work
on part of the Works.
“Such revised programme shall be submitted within 21 days from the date of
the Engineer’s notice. Failure to comply with this provision shall entitle the
Employer, subject to Sub-Clause 2.5, to payment of damages by the Contrac-
tor.”
In case the Contractor incurs delays in the achievement of a milestone, the Em-
ployer will be entitled, subject to Sub-Clause 2.5, to withhold from the Interim
Payment Certificates an amount equal to 0.05% of the Accepted Contract
Amount per day of delay, up to a maximum of 10% of the Accepted Contract
Amount. The amount so withheld shall be paid to the Contractor, if and when
the milestone is reached. Any remaining monies so withheld shall be paid upon
the issue of the Taking-Over Certificate for the Works.
It is also mentioned that these delay damages are the only damages due for such
default (late completion, except in the event of termination by the Employer.
This tends to restrict the constitution of “black lists” or other similar instru-
ments.
The usual practice is to limit the total amount of delay damages at a maximum
of 15% of the final Contract Price. For contracts where completion of the
Works by a certain date is of paramount importance, it might be envisaged to
(i) introduce a higher amount of delay damages, but also (ii) introduce a bonus
for acceleration.
It should also be noted that Employers might, in duly justified cases, waive
their rights to delay damages, or suspend the actual payment of such damages
by the Contractor until the completion of the Works, for example in case pay-
ment of such damages would create strong pressures on the Contractor’s cash
flow and would jeopardize the actual completion of the Works.
New Sub-Clause
Incentives for early completion may be included in the tender documents (al-
though Sub-Clause 13.2 refers to accelerated completion).
The wording in the sub-paragraphs includes the conditions which are typically
applicable for a plant contract, but otherwise may require amendment. In par-
ticular, sub-paragraph (c) refers to trial operation, during which any product
produced by the Works becomes the property of the Employer. He thus be-
comes responsible for disposing of it, and entitled to retain the proceeds from
selling it. If the product is to be retained by the Contractor, the Sub-Clause
should be amended accordingly.
The role of the Engineer in the taking over commission is not defined. Unless
expressly forbidden by the Law, it might be recommendable that the Engineer
be nominated as representative of the Employer.
It remains for Employers and Engineers to agree on what exactly means “minor
outstanding work and defects which will not substantially affect the use of the
Works or Section for their intended purpose”.
structure subsists during the lifetime of the Works (Article 29 of Law No.
10/1995). Such statutory periods of liability are acknowledged in the mandatory
particular conditions in Appendix B1.
With many types of Works, it may be essential to define the physical inputs,
and/or for tenderers to prescribe (in a Schedule of Guarantees, probably) the
performance criteria which their Plant will achieve.
The provisions in the General Conditions are based upon the Tests after Com-
pletion being carried out by the Employer and his operating personnel, with
guidance from the Contractor's staff. If other arrangements are envisaged, they
should be specified in the Employer's Requirements, and the Sub-Clause should
be amended accordingly. For example, the provisions in FIDIC's Conditions of
Contract for EPC/Turnkey Projects are based upon these Tests being carried out
by the Contractor, with the Employer providing consumables, personnel and
power.
c) The Engineer may request a proposal under Sub-Clause 13.3, seeking prior
agreement so as to minimise dispute.
“The Contractor shall be fully responsible for any proposal made under this
Sub-Clause, including for the period required for its review and approval. The
Contractor shall not be entitled to any extension of time, Cost or profit related
to such period of review and approval.”
A new paragraph needs to be added at the end of this Sub-Clause reflecting the
obligation for the Contractor to comply with Romanian public procurement
regulations when purchasing Plant, Materials or services other than from a
“The Tender and subsequently the Contract Amount shall have been based on
the Contractor’s projections for inflation over the implementation period. Thus
the Contract Price shall not be subject to any adjustment due to inflation, rise
or fall in the cost of labour, materials or any other matters affecting the execu-
tion of the Contract. Cases provided by clause 13.7 are not subject to this re-
striction.”
It should be noted that the proposed formula applies only for works performed
after the changes occurred (so it applies for what “remains to be executed” in
accordance with provisions of GD No. 925/2006). Actually the multiplier is
calculated for the works performed during month n.
Normally, this type of contract is based on a lump sum price, with little or no
remeasurement. The Contractor thus takes the risk of changes in cost arising
from his design. The lump sum price may consist of two or more amounts,
quoted in the currencies of payment (which may, but need not, include the Lo-
cal Currency).
“Any Statement under this Sub-Clause shall be signed by the Contractor’s Rep-
resentative duly appointed in accordance with Sub-Clause 4.3. In case a State-
ment is not signed by the duly appointed Contractor’s Representative, such
Statement shall be void and ineffective.”
The figures inserted by the Tenderer in the Schedule of Payments may be com-
pared with his tender programme (if any), in order to assess whether they are
reasonably consistent with each other.
In most cases, this Sub-Clause would apply only for the conditions of contract
for plant and design-build, and the Schedule would actually make reference to
actual progress. It is important to define such progress by reference to non-
ambiguous milestones. Situations in which payments depend on a rate of
achievement estimated by the Engineer without proper substantiation should be
avoided. It is therefore recommended to elaborate a Schedule that takes into
account the main steps of the Contract and the main “objects” in the design and
execution. Some objects might also be divided into sub-phases. In some cases,
tenderers would have to price each object. It is however preferable that the
“weight” of each sub-phase be defined in the tender documents.
It has to be noted that the Employer is not entitled to modify any Payment Cer-
tificate, but in case of arithmetical mistakes. Any other claim of the Employer
has to be made in accordance with the procedure defined in Sub-Clause 2.5. It
also has to be noted that, in case the Employer considers that an undue payment
has been made, he can also include in his claim the related financing costs. The
scope of those provisions is to ensure that an adequate flow of cash is main-
tained.
The financing charges for amount/s receivable not paid on the due date shall be
the interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its principal refi-
nancing operations, as published in the C series of the Official Journal of the
European Communities, in force on the first calendar day of the month in
which the due date falls, increased by three and a half percentage points.
“The Contractor may request the payment of retention money against the sub-
mission to the Employer of a bank guarantee. In such case, the Engineer shall
certify and the Employer shall make payment to the Contractor of the amounts
related to Retention Money, after he obtains such guarantee, in a form and pro-
vided by an entity approved by the Employer, in amounts and currencies equal
to the payments to be made. The Contractor may gradually increase the amount
of the bank guarantee, in accordance with the estimates submitted under Sub-
Clause 14.4 [Schedule of Payments]. The amount of the bank guarantee shall
however be equal to the limit of Retention Money stated in the Appendix to
Tender when the total of all certified interim payments (excluding the advance
payment and deductions and repayments of retention) exceeds seventy per cent
(70%) of the Accepted Contract Amount less Provisional Sums.
The Contractor shall ensure that the guarantee is valid and enforceable until
the Contractor has executed and completed the Works and remedied any de-
fects, as specified for the Performance Security in Sub-Clause 4.2. The release
of the guarantee shall be in lieu of the release of the second half of the Reten-
tion Money under the second paragraph of Sub-Clause 14.9, while the Contrac-
tor shall be entitled, when the Taking-Over Certificate has been issued for the
Works, to a reduction of the amount of the bank guarantee corresponding with
the first half of the Retention Money.”
“The Contractor undertakes to repay to the Employer any amounts paid in ex-
cess of the final amount due within 45 days of receiving a request to do so.
Should the Contractor fail to make repayment within the deadline set by the
Employer, the Employer may increase the amounts due by adding interest:
- At the discount rate applied by the central bank of the country of the
Employer if payments are in the currency of that country;
- At the rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinanc-
ing transactions in euro where payments are in euro,
on the first day of the month in which the time-limit expired, plus three and a
half percentage points. The default interest shall be incurred over the time
which elapses between that date of the payment deadline set by the Employer
(exclusive), and the date on which payment is actually made (inclusive). Any
partial payments shall first cover the interest thus established.
Financing Arrangements
For major contracts in some markets, there may be a need to secure finance
from entities such as aid agencies, development banks, export credit agencies,
or other international financing institutions. If financing is to be procured from
any of these sources, the Particular Conditions may need to incorporate its spe-
cial requirements. The exact wording will depend on the relevant institution, so
reference will need to be made to them to ascertain their requirements, and to
seek approval of the draft tender documents.
The financing institution or bank may wish the Contract to include references
to the financing arrangements, especially if funding from more than one source
is to be arranged to finance different elements of supply. It is not unusual for
the Particular Conditions to include special provisions identifying different
categories of Plant and specifying the documents to be presented to the relevant
financing institution to obtain payment. If the financing institution's require-
ments are not met, it may be difficult (or even impossible) to secure suitable
financing for the project, and/or the institution may decline to provide finance
for part or all of the Contract.
However, where the financing is not tied to the export of goods and services
from any particular country but is simply provided by commercial banks lend-
ing to the Employer, those banks may be concerned to ensure that the Contrac-
tor's rights are very restricted. These banks may prefer the Contract to be based
upon FIDIC's Conditions of Contract for EPC/Turnkey Projects.
It may be appropriate for the Employer, when preparing the tender documents,
to anticipate the latter requirement by undertaking to provide a guarantee for
the element of payment which the Contractor is to receive when the Works are
complete. The acceptable form(s) of guarantee should be included in the tender
documents, annexed to the Particular Conditions: an example form is annexed
to this document, as Annex G. The following Sub-Clause may be added.
It should be noted, in the first place, that termination of the Contract is a failure,
both for the Contractor and for the Employer. In real terms, Employers would
often lose considerable time (including valuation, organisation of a new tender,
etc.) and might support significant additional costs in order to complete the
Works. Therefore, termination under this Sub-Clause should be used as a last
resort. Moreover, the notice period should be used to initiate negotiations and
remedy measures. In such cases, the Employer may postpone the termination
notice, so as to allow such negotiations to develop. “Rushing into termination”
would in any case be a mistake. In particular, the fact that the Contractor is in
It is possible to insert the following text within the last paragraph after the sec-
ond sentence:
“If the Contractor fails to remove his Equipment and Temporary Works within
21 days after receiving the notice, the Employer will be entitled to use so much
of the Contractor’s Equipment and Temporary Works which have been deemed
to be reserved exclusively for the execution of the Works, under the provisions
of the Contract, as he may consider proper, up to the completion of the respec-
tive Works.”
(i) damage to components of the Employer’s property on the Site and dam-
age done to the Works resulting from any accident involving road users
while the public use of the Works is authorised by the Employer, where it
can be demonstrated by the Contractor that the accident cannot be partly
or wholly attributed to any deficiency in the Contractor’s Traffic Man-
agement Plan.
“In Sub-Clause 17.6, the sum referred to in the penultimate sentence shall be -
……".
“The Contractor shall take full responsibility for the care of the items detailed
below, from the respective dates of use or occupation by the Contractor, up to
the respective dates of hand-over or cessation of occupation (where hand-over
or cessation of occupation may take place after the date stated in the Taking-
Over Certificate for the Works):
[Insert details]
If any loss or damage happens to any of the above items while the Contractor is
responsible for their care, arising from any cause whatsoever other than those
for which the Employer is liable, the Contractor shall, at his own cost, rectify
the Loss or damage to the satisfaction of the Engineer.”
If the Employer is to arrange any of the insurances under this Clause, the tender
documents should include details as an annex to the Particular Conditions (so
that tenderers can estimate what other insurances they wish to have for their
own protection), including the conditions, limits, exceptions and deductibles;
preferably in the form of a copy of each policy. The Employer may find it diffi-
cult to effect the insurances described in the third paragraph of Sub-Clause 18.2
(for Contractor's Equipment, which includes Subcontractor's equipment), be-
cause the Employer may not know the amount or value of these items of
equipment. The following sentence may be included in the Particular Condi-
tions.
“It shall be the responsibility of the insuring Party to notify the insurance com-
pany of any change in the nature, extent or programme for the execution of the
Works and to ensure adequacy of the insurance coverage at all times during the
period of the Contract.”
New Sub-Clause
If the Employer requires the additional protection of design insurance, an addi-
tional sub-clause may be added.
The Engineer shall, in turn, respond within 42 days after receiving a claim or
further particulars.
Although Sub-Clause 20.1 appears to say that any claim notified more than 28
days after the event can be dismissed without consideration, this is not the way
that many DABs are interpreting the clause. Most DAB decisions have allowed
a number of claims rejected for late notice to proceed. DABs have in mind that
the object of Sub-Clause 20.1 is to prevent ambushes and minimise delays to
projects, not to bar meritorious claims. The result is that Employers have been
significantly disadvantaged in the DAB process by the fact that Engineers, act-
ing in all good faith, have not ensured that the necessary records are kept, have
not advised on the merits and have not prepared considered determinations.
Guidance as to how the notice provisions should be applied in the best interests
of Employers, good project administration and fairness under the contracts.
1. Where the Engineer considers that the 28-day notice provision of Sub-
Clause 20.1 may not have been complied with, he should consider the fol-
lowing before rejecting the claim:-
(i) Is the event one which, leaving aside Clause 20, is capable of being
the basis for a valid claim?
(ii) Did the Employer or the Engineer in fact know about the event giv-
ing rise to the claim within 28 days of the event?
(iii) Is the event giving rise to the claim an action or inaction by the
Employer or the Engineer?
(iv) Was the Employer or the Engineer aware within 28 days that a
claim was probable, or should they have been so aware?
(v) Is it possible that the Contractor only considered himself entitled to
make a claim – as distinct from knowing about the event – within
the 4 weeks prior to the notice?
(vi) Has the timing of the notice caused the Employer or the Engineer
any significant prejudice in terms of the ability to mitigate or re-
cord the effects of the event?
(vii) Has the timing of the notice benefited the Contractor or does it
seem as if it was intended to benefit the Contractor?
(viii) Was there communication, whether at meetings or otherwise, about
the problem, other than by way of formal notice?
(ix) Is it fair and reasonable, taking into account all of the above, to re-
ject the claim without consideration of the merits?
2. If the answer to item (i) is that the event is not capable of being a valid
claim, the Engineer should consider rejecting the claim on its lack of valid
basis.
3. If the answer to item (i) is yes, Engineers should consider items (ii) to (iv).
If the answer to any of these items is yes, then DABs are likely to be sym-
pathetic to the Contractor.
4. Next, consider item (v). DABs are taking notice of the first sentence of
Sub-Clause 20.1: it has been argued and accepted that if the Contractor has
not in fact considered himself entitled to claim, then the obligation to notify
has not arisen. Some events might require some investigation and advice
before a contractor decides that he has a claim. One DAB decided that the
“circumstance” had not arisen until after a reasonable time for investiga-
tion. If it is probable that the Contractor would have considered himself en-
titled to claim more than 4 weeks before the notice, then rejection for lack
of notice should be considered.
5. Consider items (vi) and (vii). If there appears to have been a failure to no-
tify, has there been prejudice to the Employer or benefit to the Contractor?
In other words, would the cost or delay claimed have been reduced if earlier
notice had been given?
6. Consider item (viii). DABs do not insist that the notice is formal. If the is-
sue is raised at meetings or in general correspondence in due time, then this
is likely to be treated as adequate notice.
7. Finally, consider point (ix) and, in particular, whether any prejudice to the
Employer could be evaluated in financial terms under Sub-Clause.2.5 or in
time and deducted from any cost or time determined.
8. Promptly upon receipt of a claim and before rejecting a claim on notice
grounds, the Engineer should report to the Employer on its proposed action,
setting out its responses to the above questions. Advise whether:
(a) The claim may reasonably be rejected for lack of notice;
(b) The claim may reasonably be rejected for lack of notice but the Em-
ployer should nevertheless examine the merits due to the risk that the
DAB might disagree; or
It has to be noted that appointment of the DAB might not be opportune for all
contracts. There are two basic possibilities:
- Appointment of an “ad-hoc” DAB pre-arbitral decision by the Engi-
neer.
Unless the Engineer (although appointed by the Employer) is to make the pre-
arbitral decisions under this Clause 20, in accordance with the alternative op-
tion described below, the Contract should include the provisions under Clause
20 which, whilst not discouraging the Parties from reaching agreement on dis-
putes as the works proceed, allow them to refer contentious matters to an im-
partial dispute adjudication board.
The adjudication procedure depends for its success on, amongst other things,
the Parties' confidence in the agreed individual(s) who will serve on the DAB.
Therefore, it is essential that candidates for this position are not imposed by
either Party on the other Party; and that, if the individual is selected under Sub-
Clause 20.3, the selection is made by a wholly impartial entity. FIDIC is pre-
pared to perform this role, if this authority has been delegated in accordance
with the example wording in the Appendix to Tender.
Sub-Clause 20.2 envisages appointment of the DAB after a Party gives notice
of its intention to refer a dispute to a DAB. However, for certain types of pro-
ject, particularly those involving extensive work on Site, where it would be ap-
propriate for the DAB to visit the Site on a regular basis, it may be decided to
retain the services of a permanent DAB. In this case Sub-Clauses 20.2 and 20.4
together with the Appendix and Annex to the General Conditions, and the Dis-
pute Adjudication Agreement, should be amended to comply with correspond-
ing wording contained in the FIDIC Conditions of Contract for Construction.
Sub-Clause 20.2 provides for two alternative arrangements for the DAB:
(a) One person, who acts as the sole member of the DAB, having entered into
a tripartite agreement with both Parties; or
(b) A DAB of three persons, each of whom has entered into a tripartite agree-
ment with both Parties.
The form of this tripartite agreement could be one of the two alternatives shown
at the end of this publication, as appropriate to the arrangement adopted. Both
of these forms incorporate (by reference) the General Conditions of Dispute
Adjudication Agreement, which are included as the Appendix to the General
Conditions because they are also referred to in Sub-Clause 20.2. Under either
of these alternative forms of Dispute Adjudication Agreement, each individual
person is referred to as a Member.
Typically, DAB is recommended for contracts of more than 5 Million Euro and
DAB of 3 members for contracts of more than 100 Million Euro.
Alternatively, the Engineer may make these pre-arbitral decisions. This alterna-
tive, which has been the Engineer's traditional role in common law countries,
may be appropriate if the Engineer is an independent professional consulting
engineer with the experience and resources required for the administration of
all aspects of the contract. The Employer should recognise that, although the
Engineer generally acts for the Employer as specified in Sub-Clause 3.1(a), the
Engineer will make these pre-arbitral decisions impartially and the Employer
must not prejudice this impartiality. If this alternative is considered appropriate,
Sub-Clauses 20.2 and 20.3 should be deleted and Sub-Clause 20.4 should be
modified accordingly by deleting the second paragraph of Sub-Clause 20.4 and
substituting with:
“The Engineer shall act as the DAB in accordance with this Sub-Clause 20.4,
acting fairly, impartially and at the cost of the Employer. In the event that the
Employer intends to replace the Engineer, the Employer's notice under Sub-
Clause 3.4 shall include detailed proposals for the appointment of a replace-
ment DAB.”
“Unless settled amicably or through a DAB decision, any dispute arising out of
or in connection with the Contract, including without limitation any dispute
regarding its breach, termination or invalidity, shall be finally settled by inter-
national arbitration.”
Furthermore, Employers should carefully check the coherence between the ar-
bitral institution, the location, language and procedure of arbitration. For exam-
ple, the International Commercial Arbitral Court near the Romanian Chamber
of Commerce and Industry uses its own procedural rules. Employers are ad-
vised to link with the relevant arbitral institutions before defining such condi-
tions.
The Contract should include provisions for the resolution by international arbi-
tration of any disputes which are not resolved amicably. In international con-
struction contracts, international commercial arbitration has numerous advan-
tages over litigation in national courts, and may be more acceptable to the Par-
ties.
If the UNCITRAL (or other non-ICC) arbitration rules are preferred, it may be
necessary to designate, in the Appendix to Tender, an institution to appoint the
arbitrators or to administer the arbitration, unless the institution is named (and
their role specified) in the arbitration rules. It may also be necessary to ensure,
before so designating an institution in the Appendix to Tender, that it is pre-
pared to appoint or administer.
For major projects tendered internationally, it is desirable that the place of arbi-
tration be situated in a country other than that of the Employer or Contractor.
This country should have a modern and liberal arbitration law and should have
ratified a bilateral or multilateral convention (such as the 1958 New York Con-
vention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards), or
both, that would facilitate the enforcement of an arbitral award in the states of
the Parties.
It may be considered desirable in some cases for other Parties to be joined into
any arbitration between the Parties, thereby creating a multi-party arbitration.
While this may be feasible, multi- party arbitration clauses require skilful draft-
ing, and usually need to be prepared on a case-by-case basis. No satisfactory
standard form of multi-party arbitration clause for international use has yet
been developed.
“The Contractor will allow the Romanian Audit Authority, the Romanian Anti-
Fraud Office, the European Commission, the European Anti-Fraud Office and
the European Court of Auditors to verify, by examining the documents or by
means of on-the-spot checks, the implementation of the project and conduct a
full audit, if necessary, on the basis of supporting documents for the accounts,
accounting documents and any other document relevant to the financing of the
project. These inspections may take place up to 7 years after the final payment.
Furthermore, the Contractor will allow the Romanian and European Anti-
Fraud Offices to carry out checks and verifications on-the-spot in accordance
with the procedures set out in the European Community legislation for the pro-
tection of the financial interests of the European Communities against fraud
and other irregularities.
The Contractor guarantees that the rights of the bodies mentioned under the
first paragraph of the present Clause to carry out audits, checks and verifica-
tion will be equally applicable, under the same conditions and according to the
same rules as those set out in this Clause, to any sub-contractor or any other
party benefiting from European Commission funds.”
Clause 6 Payment
Replace letter (b) of first paragraph by:
(b) “a fixed per diem for expenses incurred in connection with the Member's
duties, for each overnight away from the Member’s home and covering the cost
of hotel, subsistence costs, local travel and other miscellaneous costs”;
(d) “other reasonable expenses incurred in connection with the Member's du-
ties, such as the cost of telephone calls, courier charges, faxes and telexes, in-
ternational travel expenses, facilities and venues for meetings and hearings: a
receipt shall be required for each item. Any air travel must be by economy class
while train travel may be by 1st class.”
“The daily fee, as well as the per diem rate, shall be as specified in the Dispute
Adjudication Agreement.”
“The Member shall submit to the Contractor, with a copy to the Employer, in-
voices for his/her daily fees and expenses monthly. All invoices shall be accom-
panied by a brief description of activities performed during the relevant period.
The Contractor shall pay each of the Member's invoices in full within 28 calen-
dar days after receiving each invoice and shall apply to the Employer (in the
Statements under the Contract) for reimbursement of one-half of the amounts of
these invoices. The Employer shall then pay the Contractor in accordance with
the Contract".
6.1 Introduction
This chapter provides guidance for the preparation of the Particular Conditions
of Contract and the Appendix for Works Contracts using the FIDIC Short Form
of Contract, 1st Edition 1999, i.e. the FIDIC Green Book.
The FIDIC General Conditions of Contract were translated into Romanian lan-
guage in August to November 2006, and was submitted to the MPF in Decem-
ber 2006.
Mandatory particular conditions of contract for the FIDIC Green Book, neces-
sary so as to harmonise the contract provisions with the current Romanian leg-
islation, were prepared in October 2006 to January 2007 and was submitted to
the MPF in January 2007.
The Romanian language version of the General Conditions of Contract and the
proposed mandatory particular conditions of contract will, after the approval by
the MPF, be published in the Official Gazette of Romania for use on infrastruc-
ture projects in Romania.
The main aim has been to produce a straightforward flexible document which in-
cludes all essential commercial provisions and which may be used for all types of
engineering and building work with a variety of administrative arrangements.
Under the usual arrangements for this type of contract, the Contractor constructs
the Works in accordance with design provided by the Employer or by his repre-
sentative (if any). However, this form may also be suitable for contracts which
include, or wholly comprise, contractor-designed civil, mechanical and/or elec-
trical works.
The form is recommended for general use, though modifications are required so
as to adapt the form to the current Romanian legislation.
The intention is that all necessary information should be provided in the Ap-
pendix to the Agreement, the latter incorporating the tenderer's offer and its ac-
ceptance in one simple document. The General Conditions are expected to cover
the majority of contracts. Nevertheless, users are able to introduce Particular
Conditions if they wish, to cater for special cases or circumstances. The General
Conditions and the Particular Conditions will together comprise the Conditions
governing the rights and obligations of the parties.
A single document is proposed for the form of tender and the agreement. This re-
flects the simple projects envisaged.
One result of the simple form of Contract is that there is an increased burden on
the Employer to set out in the Specification and Drawings the full scope of
works, including the extent of any design to be done by the Contractor.
Agreement
The printed form envisages a simple procedure of offer and acceptance. In or-
der to avoid the traps and uncertainties that surround "letters of acceptance" and
"letters of intent", it was thought preferable to promote a clear and unambiguous
practice.
It is intended that the Employer will write in the Employer's name in the
Agreement and fill in the Appendix where appropriate and send two copies to
tenderers together with the Specification, Drawings etc forming the tender
package. In respect of both copies, the Contractor is to complete, sign and date
the Offer section and complete any remaining spaces in the Appendix. Having
decided which tender to accept, the Employer signs the Acceptance section of
both copies and returns one copy to the Contractor. The Contract comes into ef-
fect upon receipt by the Contractor of his copy.
As the Contract comes into effect upon receipt of the signed Acceptance by the
Contractor, the Employer should take steps to establish when receipt occurs, for
example by requiring the Contractor to collect and sign for the Agreement.
When the applicable law imposes any form of tax such as VAT on the Works, the
Employer should make clear whether tenderers should include such taxes in their
prices. Similarly, if payment is to be made in whole or in part in a currency other
than the currency of the Country, the Employer should make this clear to tender-
ers. See Sub-Clause 11.7.
Appendix
The Employer should complete the Appendix as indicated prior to inviting ten-
ders. Tenderers may be asked to insert a Time for Completion at 1.1.9 if none is
specified. Where tenderers are required to submit design with their tenders, the
documents containing the tendered design should be identified by the tenderer
against item 1.1.1(f) of the Appendix.
A number of suggestions have been made in the Appendix, such as the time for
submission of the Contractor's programme under Sub-Clause 7.2 and the amount
of retention under Sub-Clause 11.3. If these suggestions are adopted by the Em-
ployer, no action is required. Otherwise, they should be deleted and replaced.
1.1.1 "Contract". The list of documents serves two purposes: firstly, to identify
which documents form part of the Contract; and secondly, to provide an order
of priority in the event of conflict between them.
Document identification is necessary to avoid any possible doubt, for example be-
cause specifications have been subject to revisions. A complete list of Draw-
ings is always desirable and could be attached on a separate sheet.
The Specification should set out in clear terms any design that the Contractor is
required to undertake, including the extent to which any design proposals are to
be submitted with the tender. If none, the reference to the Contractor's tendered
design should be deleted.
If there are additional documents which are required to form part of the Con-
tract, such as schedules of information provided by the Contractor, these should
be added by the Employer. Consideration should be given in each case to the
required priority.
1.1.7 "Commencement Date". The starting date for the Contract is 14 days after the
date when the Contractor receives the Agreement signed by the Employer,
unless the Parties agree otherwise.
1.1.14 "Force Majeure" may include, but is not limited to, exceptional events or
circumstances of the kind listed below, so long as all of the four conditions stated
in the definition have been satisfied:
a) War, hostilities (whether war be declared or not), invasion, act of foreign
enemies
b) Rebellion, terrorism, revolution, insurrection, military or usurped power, or
civil war
c) Riot, commotion, disorder, strike or lockout by persons other than the Con-
tractor's personnel and other employees
d) Munitions of war, explosive materials, ionising radiation or contamination
by radioactivity, except as may be attributable to the Contractor's use of such
munitions, explosives, radiation or radioactivity, and
e) Natural catastrophes such as earthquake, hurricane, typhoon or volcanic ac-
tivity.
1.1.19 “Works”. The term "Works" is intended to cover all the obligations of the
Contractor, including any design and the remedying of defects.
On the other hand, if for any reason, permits etc may also be required from
places other than the Country, this Sub-Clause could be limited by the addition
at the end of the words: "... in the Country but not elsewhere."
Sub-Clause 3.2 should be entirely deleted and replaced with the wording pro-
vided in the mandatory particular conditions (Appendix C), so as to introduce
the requirements of Law No. 10/1995 related to the verification of the proper
performance of the Works through qualified persons appointed by the Em-
ployer.
Once appointed, the Employer's representative acts for and in the interests of
the Employer. There is no dual role or duty to be impartial. If an impartial Em-
ployer's Representative is required with a role similar to the traditional Engi-
neer, then the following words could be used in the Particular Conditions:
"Replace the final sentence of Sub-Clause 3.2 with the following: "The Em-
ployer's Representative shall exercise in a fair and impartial manner the pow-
ers of the Employer under or in connection with the following Sub-Clauses:
1.3, 2.3, 4.2, 4.3, 5.1, 7.3, 8.2, 9.1, 9.2, 10.1, 10.2, 10.5, 11.1 to 11.6, 11.8, 12.1,
13.2 and 14.1."
To the extent that the Employer has delegated powers to an Employer's repre-
sentative, he should be careful not to exercise such powers himself in order to
avoid the risk of conflicting instructions, decisions, etc.
Suggested forms of performance bond (surety bond) or bank guarantee have not
been provided. If it is felt that the scale of project warrants security by means of
a bond, then local commercial practice should dictate the form. Example forms
are included with FIDIC's Conditions of Contract for Construction. The amount
and a reference to the desired form of any required security should be set out in
the Appendix.
The Contractor will have an absolute obligation to ensure that the parts of the
Works designed by him are fit for their purpose, provided that the intended
purposes are defined in the Contract. The Employer must therefore make clear
in the parts of the Specification that impose design obligations, the intended pur-
poses of the part of the Works to be designed by the Contractor. This should be
done even where this seems obvious in order to avoid argument about whether an
intended purpose is defined or not.
If a party wishes to protect the intellectual property in his design, provision must
be made in the Particular Conditions.
In line with normal practice, it is not envisaged that the Works need be 100%
complete before the Employer may take over. Once the Works are ready to be
used for their intended purpose, the notice should be given. There is no provi-
sion for taking-over of only parts of the Works but if this is required, provision
should be made in the Particular Conditions.
There is no defined Defects Liability Period but during the period - normally 12
months - from the date of taking-over, the Employer may notify the Contractor
of defects. The Contractor must remedy such defects within a reasonable time.
If he fails to do so, the Employer may employ others for that purpose at the Con-
tractor's cost. The Employer may also notify defects at any time prior to taking-
over.
The liability of the Contractor for defects will not normally end with the expiry
of the period stated in the Appendix. Although he is then no longer obliged to
return to Site to remedy defects, the defect represents a breach of contract for
which the Contractor is liable in damages. This liability remains for as long as
Romanian law stipulates. It might therefore be provided that:
“The expiry of the period stated in the Appendix does not prejudice the Contrac-
tor’s liability for the latent defects of the Works during the periods of liability
imposed by the Applicable Laws.”
designed by the Contractor either as part of his tender or after the Contract was
awarded, then this is to be done by way of an addition to the Specification or
Drawings which by Sub-Clause 5.2 will prevail over Contractor's design.
Lump sum price A lump sum offer without any supporting details.
This would be used for very minor works where
Variations are not anticipated and the Works will be
completed in a short period requiring only one pay-
ment to the Contractor.
Lump sum price with A lump sum offer supported by schedules of rates
schedule of rates prepared by the tenderer. This would be a larger con-
tract where Variations and stage payments would be
required. If the Employer does not have the resources
to prepare his own bill of quantities then this alterna-
tive would be suitable.
Lump sum price with A lump sum offer based on bill of quantities pre-
bill of quantities pared by the Employer. This would be the same as
last but where the Employer has the resources to pre-
pare his own bill of quantities. A better contract
would result with an Employer’s bill of quantities.
However, if for some special reason, more than one option is selected, for ex-
ample there is a remeasureable element in a lump sum Contract, then the details
should be carefully defined.
The Foreword indicates that this Short Form of Contract is intended for works of
short duration. In the event of a contract for works of long duration, a new clause
could be inserted at Sub-Clause 11.1 to adjust for the rise and fall in the cost of
labour, materials and other imports to the Works. Such a clause could be
adapted from the other FIDIC Conditions of Contract.
cash flow forecast linked to a stage payment proposal for agreement. This
would be reviewed in the event of an extension of time made in accordance with
Sub-Clause 7.3.
An invoice may also be required, in which case it could be submitted with the
statement.
mination takes place, the Employer may take over and use the Contractor's
Equipment to complete the Works. Care should be taken, however, if the equip-
ment on Site is hired: no specific provision is made to cover this situation and the
Employer is unlikely to be able to retain such equipment.
If Contractor's Equipment is essential for the safety or stability of the Works, the
Employer will be obliged to agree terms with the Contractor for the retention of
such equipment.
Any requirements for insurance after the date of the Employer's notice under
Sub-Clause 8.2, or arising from taking-over parts of the Works, should be cov-
ered by Particular Conditions. See also Clause 13.
If the Employer wishes to take out the insurances instead of the Contractor, the
following should be used as a Particular Condition in place of Sub-Clause 14.1:
• "Replace the text of Sub-Clause 14.1 with the following: "The Employer
shall, prior to the Commencement Date, effect insurance in the joint names
of the Parties of the types, in the amounts and with the exclusions stipulated in
the Appendix. The Employer shall provide the Contractor with evidence that
any required policy is in force and that the premiums have been paid."
Sub-Clauses 14.2 and 14.3 should be deleted if the Employer takes out the in-
surance.
It should be noted that in the event of the Employer's failure to insure, the Con-
tractor may give notice under Sub-Clause 12.2.
Care should be taken about whether an adjudicator should be local or from a neu-
tral country. Although the adjudicator should be impartial, the costs of employing
someone from a third country could be disproportionate if it is necessary for the
adjudicator to visit or if a hearing became necessary. However, in view of the
costs involved in arbitration, even of minor disputes, any extra cost of a truly im-
partial adjudicator is a recommended investment.
It is intended that all decisions made by the Employer or his representative should
be capable of being reviewed by an adjudicator and, if required, by an arbitrator.
The Specification should set out in clear terms any design that the Contractor is
required to undertake, including the extent to which any design proposals are to
be submitted with the tender. If none, the reference to the Contractor's tendered
design should be deleted.
If there are additional documents which are required to form part of the Con-
tract, such as schedules of information provided by the Contractor (elements of
the Contractor proposal), these should be added by the Employer. Considera-
tion should be given in each case to the required priority.
Tender Security
This template is based on the template proposed by FIDIC, refer their Annex B,
and adjusted in compliance with the requirements of the Romanian legislation,
i.e. the provisions of GD No. 925/2006 on public procurement.
The templates are attached in Appendix E.1, Templates for Contractual Issues.
Letter of Tender
The Letter of Tender is based on the draft proposed by FIDIC, modified for
particular requirements of Romanian legislation.
Appendix to Tender
The Appendix to Tender is based on the draft proposed by FIDIC, modified for
particular requirements of Romanian legislation.
Contract Agreement
The Contract Agreement is based on the draft proposed by FIDIC, modified for
particular requirements of Romanian legislation.
The templates are attached in Appendix E.2, Templates for Contractual Issues.
Agreement
The Agreement is based on the draft proposed by FIDIC, modified for particu-
lar requirements of Romanian legislation.
Appendix
The Appendix is based on the draft proposed by FIDIC, modified for particular
requirements of Romanian legislation.
The templates are applicable for the FIDIC red, yellow and green books.
Name and address of Employer: <Insert name and address> (together with successors and assigns).
We have been informed that <Insert name of Tenderer> (hereinafter called the "Contractor") is submitting an
offer for such Contract in response to your invitation, and that the conditions of your invitation require his
offer to be supported by a parent company guarantee.
In consideration of you, the Employer, awarding the Contract to the Contractor, we <Insert name of parent
company> irrevocably and unconditionally guarantee to you, as a primary obligation, and waiving the
benefits of discussion and division, the due performance of all the Contractor's obligations and liabilities
under the Contract, including the Contractor's compliance with all its terms and conditions according to their
true intent and meaning.
If the Contractor fails to so perform his obligations and liabilities and comply with the Contract, we will
indemnify the Employer against and from all damages, losses and expenses (including legal fees and
expenses) which arise from any such failure for which the Contractor is liable to the Employer under the
Contract.
This guarantee shall come into full force and effect when the Contract comes into full force and effect. If the
Contract does not come into full force and effect within a year of the date of this guarantee, or if you
demonstrate that you do not intend to enter into the Contract with the Contractor, this guarantee shall be void
and ineffective. This guarantee shall continue in full force and effect until all the Contractor's obligations and
liabilities under the Contract have been discharged, when this guarantee shall expire and shall be returned to
us, and our liability hereunder shall be discharged absolutely.
This guarantee shall apply and be supplemental to the Contract as amended or varied by the Employer and
the Contractor from time to time. We hereby authorise them to agree any such amendment or variation, the
due performance of which and compliance with which by the Contractor are likewise guaranteed hereunder.
Our obligations and liabilities under this guarantee shall not be discharged by any allowance of time or other
indulgence whatsoever by the Employer to the Contractor, or by any variation or suspension of the works to
be executed under the Contract, or by any amendments to the Contract or to the constitution of the
Contractor or the Employer, or by any other matters, whether with or without our knowledge or consent.
This guarantee shall be governed by the law of the same country (or other jurisdiction) as that which governs
the Contract and any dispute under this guarantee shall be finally settled under the Rules of Arbitration of the
International Chamber of Commerce by one or more arbitrators appointed in accordance with such Rules.
We confirm that the benefit of this guarantee may be assigned subject only to the provisions for assignment
of the Contract.
TENDER SECURITY
Name and address of Beneficiary: <Insert name and address> (defined as the Employer).
We have been informed that <Insert name of Tenderer> (hereinafter called the "Principal") is submitting an
offer for such Contract in response to your invitation, and that the conditions of your invitation (the
"conditions of invitation", which are set out in a document entitled Instructions to Tenderers) require his offer
to be supported by a tender security.
At the request of the Principal, we <Insert name of bank> hereby irrevocably undertake to pay you, the
Beneficiary/Employer, any sum or sums not exceeding in total the amount of <Insert amount> (say: <Insert
amount in words>) upon receipt by us of your demand in writing and your written statement (in the demand)
stating that:
(a) The Principal has, without your agreement, withdrawn his offer after the latest time specified for its
submission and before the expiry of its period of validity, or
(b) You awarded the Contract to the Principal and he has refused to execute the Contract Agreement, or
(c) You awarded the Contract to the Principal and he has failed to comply with sub-clause 4.2 of the
conditions of the Contract.
Any demand for payment must contain your signature(s) which must be authenticated by your bankers or by
a notary public. The authenticated demand and statement must be received by us at this office on or before
<Insert date> (the date 35 days after the expiry of the validity of the Letter of Tender), when this guarantee
shall expire and shall be returned to us.
This guarantee is subject to the Uniform Rules for Demand Guarantees, published as number 458 by the
International Chamber of Commerce, except as stated above.
Name and address of Beneficiary: <Insert name and address> (whom the Contract defines as the
Employer).
We have been informed that <Insert name of contractor> (hereinafter called the "Principal") is your contractor
under such Contract, which requires him to obtain a performance security.
At the request of the Principal, we <Insert name of bank> hereby irrevocably undertake to pay you, the
Beneficiary/Employer, any sum or sums not exceeding in total the amount of <Insert amount> (the
"guaranteed amount", say: <Insert amount in words>) upon receipt by us of your demand in writing and your
written statement stating:
(a) That the Principal is in breach of his obligation(s) under the Contract, and
(b) The respect in which the Principal is in breach.
Following the receipt by us of an authenticated copy of the taking-over certificate for the whole of the works
under Clause 10 of the conditions of the Contract, such guaranteed amount shall be reduced by 70% and we
shall promptly notify you that we have received such certificate and have reduced the guaranteed amount
accordingly.1
Any demand for payment must contain your [minister's/director's] (1) signature(s) which must be
authenticated by your bankers or by a notary public. The authenticated demand and statement must be
received by us at this office on or before <Insert date> (the date 70 days after the expected expiry of the
Defects Notification Period for the Works) (the "expiry date"), when this guarantee shall expire and shall be
returned to us.
We have been informed that the Beneficiary may require the Principal to extend this guarantee if the
performance certificate under the Contract has not been issued by the date 28 days prior to such expiry
date. We undertake to pay you such guaranteed amount upon receipt by us, within such period of 28 days,
of your demand in writing and your written statement that the performance certificate has not been issued,
for reasons attributable to the Principal, and that this guarantee has not been extended.
[This guarantee is fully transferable in favour of [financing institution) its successors and assignees).]
This guarantee shall be governed by the laws of Romania and shall be subject to the Uniform Rules for
Demand Guarantees, published as number 458 by the International Chamber of Commerce, except as
stated above.
1
When writing the tender documents, the writer should ascertain whether to include the optional text, shown in
parentheses [ ]
Name and address of Beneficiary: <Insert name and address> (defined as the Employer).
We have been informed that <Insert name of Contractor> (hereinafter called the "Principal") is your
contractor under such Contract and wishes to receive an advance payment, for which the Contract requires
him to obtain a guarantee.
At the request of the Principal, we <Insert name of Bank> hereby irrevocably undertake to pay you, the
Beneficiary/Employer, any sum or sums not exceeding in total the amount of <Insert amount> (the
"guaranteed amount", say: <Insert amount in words>) upon receipt by us of your demand in writing and your
written statement stating:
(a) That the Principal has failed to repay the advance payment in accordance with the conditions of the
Contract, and
(b) The amount which the Principal has failed to repay.
This guarantee shall become effective upon receipt [of the first instalment] of the advance payment by the
Principal. Such guaranteed amount shall be reduced by the amounts of the advance payment repaid to you,
as evidenced by your notices issued under sub-clause 14.6 of the conditions of the Contract. Following
receipt (from the Principal) of a copy of each purported notice, we shall promptly notify you of the revised
guaranteed amount accordingly.
Any demand for payment must contain your signature(s) which must be authenticated by your bankers or by
a notary public. The authenticated demand and statement must be received by us at this office on or before
<Insert date> (the "expiry date"), when this guarantee shall expire and shall be returned to us.
We have been informed that the Beneficiary may require the Principal to extend this guarantee if the
advance payment has not been repaid by the date 28 days prior to such expiry date. We undertake to pay
you such guaranteed amount upon receipt by us, within such period of 28 days, of your demand in writing
and your written statement that the advance payment has not been repaid and that this guarantee has not
been extended.
This guarantee shall be governed by the laws of Romania and shall be subject to the Uniform Rules for
Demand Guarantees, published as number 458 by the International Chamber of Commerce, except as
stated above.
Name and address of Beneficiary: <Insert name and address> (defined as the Employer).
We have been informed that <Insert name of Contractor> (hereinafter called the "Principal") is your
contractor under such Contract and wishes to receive early payment of [part of] the retention money, for
which the Contract requires him to obtain a guarantee.
At the request of the Principal, we <Insert name of Bank> hereby irrevocably undertake to pay you, the
Beneficiary/Employer, any sum or sums not exceeding in total the amount of <Insert amount> (the
"guaranteed amount", say: <Insert amount in Words>) upon receipt by us of your demand in writing and your
written statement stating:
(a) That the Principal has failed to carry out his obligation(s) to rectify certain defect(s) for which he is
responsible under the Contract, and
(b) The nature of such defect(s).
At any time, our liability under this guarantee shall not exceed the total amount of retention money released
to the Principal by you, as evidenced by your notices issued under sub-clause 14.6 of the conditions of the
Contract with a copy being passed to us.
Any demand for payment must contain your signature(s) which must be authenticated by your bankers or by
a notary public. The authenticated demand and statement must be received by us at this office on or before
<Insert date> (the date 70 days after the expected expiry of the Defects Notification Period for the Works)
(the "expiry date"), when this guarantee shall expire and shall be returned to us.
We have been informed that the Beneficiary may require the Principal to extend this guarantee if the
performance certificate under the Contract has not been issued by the date 28 days prior to such expiry
date. We undertake to pay you such guaranteed amount upon receipt by us, within such period of 28 days,
of your demand in writing and your written statement that the performance certificate has not been issued,
for reasons attributable to the Principal, and that this guarantee has not been extended.
This guarantee is fully transferable in favour of [financing institution] its successors and assignees.
This guarantee shall be governed by the laws of Romania and shall be subject to the Uniform Rules for
Demand Guarantees, published as number 458 by the International Chamber of Commerce, except as
stated above.
Name and address of Beneficiary: <Insert name and address> (defined as the Contractor).
We have been informed that <Insert name of Employer> (whom the Contract defines as the Employer and
who is hereinafter called the "Principal") is required to obtain a bank guarantee.
At the request of the Principal, we <Insert name of Bank> hereby irrevocably undertake to pay you, the
Beneficiary/Contractor, any sum or sums not exceeding in total the amount of <Insert amount> (say: <Insert
amount in words>) upon receipt by us of your demand in writing and your written statement stating:
(a) That, in respect of a payment due under the Contract, the Principal has failed to make payment in full
by the date fourteen days after the expiry of the period specified in the Contract as that within which
such payment should have been made, and
(b) The amount(s) which the Principal has failed to pay.
Any demand for payment must be accompanied by a copy of [list of documents evidencing entitlement to
payment], in respect of which the Principal has failed to make payment in full.
Any demand for payment must contain your signature(s) which must be authenticated by your bankers or by
a notary public. The authenticated demand and statement must be received by us at this office on or before
<Insert date> (the date six months after the expected expiry of the Defects Notification Period for the Works)
when this guarantee shall expire and shall be returned to us.
This guarantee shall be governed by the laws of Romania and shall be subject to the Uniform Rules for
Demand Guarantees, published as number 458 by the International Chamber of Commerce, except as
stated above.
LETTER OF TENDER
We have examined the Conditions of Contract, Specification, Drawings, Bill of Quantities, the other
Schedules, the attached Appendix and Addenda Nos. <Insert Nos.> for the execution of the above-named
Works. We offer to execute and complete the Works and remedy any defects therein in conformity with this
Tender which includes all these documents, for the sum of (in currencies of payment)
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
or such other sum as may be determined in accordance with the Conditions of Contract.
We accept your suggestions for the appointment of the DAB, as set out in Schedule <Insert no.>. [We have
completed the Schedule by adding our suggestions for the other Member of the DAB, but these suggestions
are not conditions of this offer].*
We agree to abide by this Tender until <Insert validity date> and it shall remain binding upon us and may be
accepted at any time before that date. We acknowledge that the Appendix forms part of this Letter of Tender.
If this offer is accepted, we will provide the specified Performance Security, commence the Works as soon as
is reasonably practicable after the Commencement Date, and complete the Works in accordance with the
above-named documents within the Time for Completion.
Unless and until a formal Agreement is prepared and executed this Letter of Tender, together with your
written acceptance thereof, shall constitute a binding contract between us.
We understand that you are not bound to accept the lowest or any tender you may receive.
Address: ___________________________________________________________________________
Date: ______________________________________________________________________________
* If the Tenderer does not accept, this paragraph may be deleted and replaced by:
We do not accept your suggestions for the appointment of the DAB. We have included our
suggestions in the Schedule, but these suggestions are not conditions of this offer. If these
suggestions are not acceptable to you, we propose that the DAB be jointly appointed in accordance
with Sub-Clause 20.2 of the Conditions of Contract.
APPENDIX TO TENDER
[Note: with the exception of the items for which the Employer's requirements have been inserted, the
following information must be completed before the Tender is submitted]
Contractor's name and address 1.1.2.3 & 1.3 <To be filled by the Contractor>
Engineer's name and address 1.1.2.4 & 1.3 <Insert name of the Engineer>
Time for access to the Site 2.1 21 days after Commencement Date
Delay damages for the Works 8.7 & 14.15(b) 0.1% of the final Contract Price per day, in
the currencies and proportions in which
the Contract Price is payable
Maximum amount of delay damages 8.7 15% of the final Contract Price
Sources of indices:
Index for adjustment (1) Published source of Index (2) Base value at
Base Date (3)
Labour L National Institute of Statistics. Monthly Bulletin
Table for: Average nominal salary, for the na-
tional economy, Construction Industry, Gross
average salary for the month in question
Bitumen B As above. Tables for indices of price for the
industrial production. Sector of crude oil ex-
traction
Fuel F As above. Tables for indices of market price
goods and services. Sector: liquid fuels
Aggregates A As above. Tables for indices of prices for the
industrial production. Sector: other non metallic
mineral products manufacturing
Energy E As above. Tables for indices of prices for the
industrial production. Sector: production,
transport and distribution of electricity, gas and
hot water
Equipment/Machinery M As above. Tables for indices of prices for the
industrial production. Sector: Outfits for mines,
quarries and construction manufacturing.
Steel S As above. Tables for indices of prices for the
industrial production. Sector: metallic construc-
tion and components manufacturing.
Cement C As above. Tables for indices of prices for the
industrial production. Sector: cement manufac-
turing.
Note: The tenderer shall quote in column (3) the value of the cost index at the Base Date.
Number and timing of instalments 14.2 In accordance with the provisions of Gov-
ernment Decision No. 264/2003 as further
modified and completed
Start repayment of advance payment 14.2(a) In accordance with the provisions of Gov-
ernment Decision No. 264/2003 as further
modified and completed
Minimum amount of third party insur- 18.3 500,000 EUR per occurrence with the
ance number of occurrences unlimited
Appointment (if not agreed) to be 20.3 The President of FIDIC or a person ap-
made by pointed by the President
Signature _____________________________________
Capacity _____________________________________
CONTRACT AGREEMENT
Between <Insert name of Employer> of Romania (hereinafter called "the Employer") of the one part, and
<Insert name and country of Contractor> (hereinafter called "the Contractor") of the other part.
Whereas the Employer desires that the Works known as <Insert project name> should be executed by the
Contractor, and has accepted a Tender by the Contractor for the execution and completion of these Works
and the remedying of any defects therein,
In Witness whereof the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and
for and on behalf of the Employer in the presence for and on behalf of the Contractor in the presence
of of
AGREEMENT
The Employer is
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. of
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
The Contractor is
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. of
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
The Employer desires the execution of certain Works known as
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
OFFER
The Contractor has examined the documents listed in the Appendix which forms part of this Agreement and
offers to execute the Works in conformity with the Contract for the sum, excluding value added tax (VAT), of
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… (in words)
……………………………………………………………………….…….….. (in figures) (…………………………..)
to which the following VAT amount will be added
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… (in words)
……………………………………………………………………….…….….. (in figures) (…………………………..)
or for such other sum as may be ascertained under the Contract.
This offer, of which the Contractor has submitted two signed originals, may be accepted by the Employer by
signing and returning one original of this document to the Contractor before…………………… (date).
The Contractor understands that the Employer is not bound to accept the lowest or any offer received for the
Works.
ACCEPTANCE
The Employer has by signing below, accepted the Contractor's offer and agrees that in consideration for the
execution of the Works by the Contractor, the Employer shall pay the Contractor in accordance with the
Contract. This Agreement comes into effect on the date when the Contractor receives one original of this
document signed by the Employer.
APPENDIX
This Appendix forms part of the Agreement.
[Note: with the exception of the items for which the Employer's requirements have been inserted, the
Contractor shall complete the following information before submitting his offer.]
Item Sub-Clause Data
Documents forming the Contract listed in 1.1.1
the order of priority
Document (delete if not applicable) Document Identification
(a) The Agreement…………………
(b) Particular Conditions…………...
(c) General Conditions……………..
(d) The Specification……………….
(e) The Drawings…………………..
(f) The Contractor's tendered design
(g) The bill of quantities……………
(h) ………………………………….
(i) …………………………………..
Requirements for Contractor's design (if 5.1 Refer Specification Clause No. ….
any)
Programme
Amount payable due to failure to com- 7.4 0.1% per day up to a maximum of 10% of sum
plete stated in the Agreement
Period for notifying defects 9.1 & 11.5 365 days calculated from the dated stated in
the notice under Sub-Clause 8.2
Variation procedure
Insurances 14.1
The Works, Materials, Plants and The sum stated in the Agree-
Fees ment plus 15%
Third Party injury to persons and 500 000 Euro per event. Unlim-
damage to property ited number of events
Other cover
Signature _____________________________________
Capacity _____________________________________
Whereas the Employer and the Contractor have entered into the Contract and desire jointly to appoint the
Member to act as sole adjudicator who is also called the "DAB".
1. The conditions of this Dispute Adjudication Agreement comprise the "General Conditions of Dispute
Adjudication Agreement", which is appended to the General Conditions of the "Conditions of Contract
for Construction" First Edition 1999 published by the Fédération Internationale des Ingénieurs-
Conseils (FIDIC), and the following provisions. In these provisions, which include amendments and
additions to the General Conditions of Dispute Adjudication Agreement, words and expressions shall
have the same meanings as are assigned to them in the General Conditions of Dispute Adjudication
Agreement.
2. [Details of amendments to the General Conditions of Dispute Adjudication Agreement, if any. For
example:
In the procedural rules annexed to the General Conditions of Dispute Adjudication Agreement, Rule _
is deleted and replaced by: ………]
3. In accordance with Clause 6 of the General Conditions of Dispute Adjudication Agreement, the
Member shall be paid as follows:
A retainer fee of <Insert amount> per calendar month, plus
A daily fee of <Insert amount> per day.
4. In consideration of these fees and other payments to be made by the Employer and the Contractor in
accordance with Clause 6 of the General Conditions of Dispute Adjudication Agreement, the Member
undertakes to act as the DAB (as adjudicator) in accordance with this Dispute Adjudication
Agreement.
5. The Employer and the Contractor jointly and severally undertake to pay the Member, in consideration
of the carrying out of these services, in accordance with Clause 6 of the General Conditions of Dispute
Adjudication Agreement.
6. This Dispute Adjudication Agreement shall be governed by the law of Romania.
for and on behalf of the Employer for and on behalf of the Contractor The Member in the presence of
in the presence of in the presence of in the presence of
Whereas the Employer and the Contractor have entered into the Contract and desire jointly to appoint the
Member to act as one of the three persons who are jointly called the "DAB" [and desire the Member to act as
chairman of the DAB].
1. The conditions of this Dispute Adjudication Agreement comprise the "General Conditions of Dispute
Adjudication Agreement", which is appended to the General Conditions of the "Conditions of Contract
for Construction" First Edition 1999 published by the Fédération Internationale des Ingénieurs-
Conseils (FIDIC), and the following provisions. In these provisions, which include amendments and
additions to the General Conditions of Dispute Adjudication Agreement, words and expressions shall
have the same meanings as are assigned to them in the General Conditions of Dispute Adjudication
Agreement.
2. [Details of amendments to the General Conditions of Dispute Adjudication Agreement, if any. For
example:
In the procedural rules annexed to the General Conditions of Dispute Adjudication Agreement, Rule _
is deleted and replaced by: " … "]
3. In accordance with Clause 6 of the General Conditions of Dispute Adjudication Agreement, the
Member shall be paid as follows:
A retainer fee of <Insert amount> per calendar month; plus
A daily fee of <Insert amount> per day.
4. In consideration of these fees and other payments to be made by the Employer and the Contractor in
accordance with Clause 6 of the General Conditions of Dispute Adjudication Agreement, the Member
undertakes to serve, as described in this Dispute Adjudication Agreement, as one of the three persons
who are jointly to act as the DAB.
5. The Employer and the Contractor jointly and severally undertake to pay the Member, in consideration
of the carrying out of these services, in accordance with Clause 6 of the General Conditions of Dispute
Adjudication Agreement.
6. This Dispute Adjudication Agreement shall be governed by the law of Romania.
for and on behalf of the Employer for and on behalf of the Contractor The Member in the presence of
in the presence of in the presence of in the presence of