Audit of Receivable
Audit of Receivable
Audit of Receivable
Applied Auditing
Audit of Receivables
(1) Lapping . Lapping is an embezzlement scheme in which cash collections from customers are
stolen and the shortage is concealed by delaying the recording of subsequent cash receipts.
Lapping most frequently occurs when one individual has responsibility for both recordkeeping and
custody of cash. Although the best way to control lapping is to segregate duties and thereby make its
occurrence difficult, it may be detected by using the following procedures:
(a) Analytical procedures—calculate age of receivables and turnover of receivables (lapping increases
the age and decreases turnover)
(b) Confirm receivables—investigate all exceptions noted, emphasize accounts that have been written
off and old accounts. For all accounts watch for postings of cash receipts which have taken an
unusually long time. For example, when a reply to a confirmation suggests that the account was paid
on December 29, investigate when the posting occurred.
Receivable confirmations primarily test the existence assertion, and only to a limited extent the
completeness and valuation assertions. Know the difference between the positive and negative
forms of confirmation request.
The positive form requests a reply from debtors. Some positive forms request the recipient to
indicate either agreement or disagreement with the information stated on the request. Other positive
forms, “blank forms,” do not state the amount (or other information), but request the respondent to
fill in the balance or furnish other information, and when used, often result in lower response rates.
The negative form requests the recipient to respond only if he or she disagrees with the information
stated on the request. Negative confirmation requests may be used when
(a) The combined assessed level of inherent risk and control risk is low,
(b) A large number of small balances is involved, and
(c) The auditor has no reason to believe that recipients are unlikely to give them adequate
Note that when no reply is received to the negative form, the assumption is made that the debtor
agrees with the amount and that evidence as to the existence assertion has been collected.
When no reply is received to a positive confirmation, a second request is normally mailed to the
debtor; if no reply to the second request is received, the auditor normally performs alternative
procedures (e.g., examination of shipping documents, subsequent cash receipts, sales agreements).
However, the auditor may consider not performing alternative procedures when (1) no unusual
qualitative factors or systematic characteristics related to responses have been identified, and (2) the
nonresponses in total, when projected as 100% misstatements to the population, are immaterial.
7. Generally accepted accounting principles require that material sales returns and allowances be:
a. recorded in the period when the merchandise is returned.
b. recorded in the period when the credit memo is issued.
c. matched with related sales.
d. recorded as a debit to the sales account.
8. Communication addressed to the debtor requesting him or her to confirm whether the balance as
stated on the communication is correct or incorrect is a:
a. representation letter.
b. negative confirmation.
c. bank confirmation.
d. positive confirmation.
9. Which of the following is likely to be determined first when performing tests of details for accounts
receivable?
a. Recorded accounts receivable exist.
b. Accounts receivable in the aged trial balance agree with related master file amounts, and the
total is correctly added and agrees with the general ledger.
c. Accounts receivable are owned.
d. Existing accounts receivable are included.
10. Analytical procedures are substantive tests and, if the results of the analytical procedures are
favorable, the auditor will:
a. reduce the extent of tests of details of balances.
b. reduce the extent of tests of controls.
c. reduce the tests of transactions.
d. reduce all of the other tests.
11. The most effective test of details of accounts receivable is the:
a. detail tie-in of the records.
4. Which of the following might be detected by an auditor's review of the client's sales cut-off?
A. Excessive goods returned for credit
B. Unrecorded sales discount
C. Lapping of year-ends accounts receivable
D. Inflated sales for the year
5. An auditor most likely would review an entity's periodic accounting for numerical sequence of
shipping documents and invoices to support management's financial statement assertion of
A. Existence or occurrence
B. Valuation
9. An auditor who has confirmed accounts receivable may discover that the sales journal was held
open past year-end if
A. Positive confirmations sent to debtor are not returned
B. Negative confirmations sent to debtors are not returned
C. Most of the returned negative confirmations indicate that the debtor owes larger balance that the
amount being confirmed
D. Most of the returned positve confirmations indicate that the debtor owes a smaller balance that the
amount being confirmed.
10. The auditor finds situation in which one person has the ability to collect receivables,make deposits,
issue credit memos and record receipt if payments. The auditor suspects the individual may be
stealing from cash receipts. Which of the following audit procedures would be most effective in
discovering fraud in this scenario?
A. Send positive confirmations to all random selection of customers
B. Send negative confirmations to all outstanding accounts receivable customers
C. Perform a detailed review of debits to customer discounts,sales returns, or other debit accounts
excluding cash posted to the cash receipts
D. Take a sample of bank deposits and trace the detail in each bank deposit back to the entry in the
cash receipts journal
11. The positive request form of accounts receivable confirmation may be used when the
12. The negative request form of accounts receivable confirmation may be used whan the
Combined Assessed Number of Small Consideration by the
Level of Inherent and Balances Is Recipient
Control Risks
A. Low Many Likely
B. Low Few Unlikely
C. High Few Likely
13. Which of the following is the greatest drawback of using the subsequent collections evidenced only
by a deposit slip as an alternative procedure when responses to positive accounts receivable
confirmation are not received?
A. Checking of subsequent collections can never be used as an alternative auditing procedure
B. By examining a deposit slip only, the auditor does not know whther the payment is for the
receivable at the balance sheet date or subsequent transaction
C. A depositor slip is not received directly by the auditor
D. A customer may not have made a payment in a timely basis.
14. Confirmation of accounts receivable is generally accepted auditing procedure. The presumption
that an auditor will confirm accounts receivable is not overcome if
A. Based on a prior year's audit experience response rates will be inadequate
15.Which of the following procedures would an auditor most likely perform for year-end accounts
receivable confirmations when the auditor did not receive replies to second request?
A. Review the cash receipts journal for the month prior to year-end
B. Intensify the study of internal control concerning revenue cycle
C. Increased the assessed level of detection risk for existence assertion
D. Inspect the shipping records documenting the merchandise sold to the debtors
16.An auditor should perform alternative procedures to substantiate the existence of accounts
receivable when
A. No reply to a positive confirmation request is received
B. No reply to a negative confirmation request is received
C. Collectibility of the receivables is in doubt
D. Pledging of the receivables is probable
17.An auditor's purpose in reviewing credit ratings of customers with deliquent accounts receivable
most likely is to obtain evidence concerning management's assertion about
A. Valuation or allocation
B. Presentation and disclosure
C. Existence and occurence
D. Rights and obligations
18. An aged trial balance of accounts receivable is usually used by the auditor to
A. Verify the validity of recorded receivables
B. Ensure that all accounts are promptly credited
C. Evaluate the results of compliance test
D. Evaluate type of provision for bad debt expense
19. In verifying a November 30, 2018 sales cut off date , an auditor would be most cincerned wuth
comparing records of
A. November 2018 cash receipts with December 2018 bank deposits
B. November 2018 purchases with December 2018 shipments
C. November 2018 accounts receivable with November2018 sales
D. November 2018 sales with November 2018 shipping documents
20. To conceal defalcation involving receivables, the auditor would expect an experienced bookkeeper
to charge which of the following accounts
A. Miscellaneous income
B. Petty cash
C. Miscellaneous expense
Problem 2 (Adapted)
Abad Company provided the following ledger summarizing the transactions affecting the accounts
receivable for the current year:
Accounts Receivable
customers 5,300,000
Charge sales 6,000,000 Write-off 35,000
Shareholders’ subscriptions 00,000
2 Merchandise returns
40,000
Deposit on contract 120,000 Allow. for cust. for shipping loss 25,000
Claims against shipper for loss 00,000
1 ollections on claims
C from shipper
40,000
IOUs from employees 10,000
Problem 3 (Adapted)
When examining the accounts of Abalunan Company, it is ascertained that balances relating to both
receivables and payables are included in a single controlling account called “receivable control” that
has a debit balance of P4,850,000.
Debit Credit
Accounts receivable – customers 7,800,000
Question:
1. Compute the amount that should be reported as trade and other receivables.
2. Prepare a compound entry to adjust the accounts receivable account.
Problem 4
KAREN COMPANY’s accounts receivable subsidiary ledger shows the following information:
Invoice
08/20/16 17,840
10/25/16 21,200
10/09/16 44,000
12/02/16 24,800
The estimated bad debt rates below are based on Karen Company’s receivable collection experience.
Questions
1. The adjusted Accounts Receivable balance of KAREN COMPANY at December 31, 2016 is:
2. The adjusted balance of Allowance for Bad Debts of KAREN COMPANY at December 31, 2016 is:
3. The adjusted balance of Bad Debts Expense of KAREN COMPANY at December 31, 2016 is:
4. The net realizable value of Accounts Receivable of KAREN COMPANY at December 31, 2016 is:
Problem 5
In the audit of Beatles Company, the auditor had an appreciation of the following schedule and
noted some comments for possible adjustments:
Beatles Company
Accounts Receivable Subsidiary Schedule
December 31, 2005
The external auditor submitted the following audit comments for possible adjustments:
3. This Boy Company Merchandise worth P160,000 was destroyed while in transit
on May 31, 2005, terms FOB Destination. The carrier was
billed on June 15, 2005. (See Ticket To Ride Corp. and
Yesterday Corp.)
6. Let It Be Corporation Paid in full on December 30, 2005 but not recorded.
Collections were deposited on January 2, 2006.
REQUIRED:
Problem 6
You sent out positive confirmation request to customers of Ernelly Corporation on December 31, 2018.
Replies disputing amounts shown on the statements are summarized below.
Confirmation
No. Customer’s Comments Audit findings
17 Check for P1, 200 was mailed on Check received 1/4/19 and
December 30, 2018 credited on that date
40 Goods should have been billed at Pricing policy confirmed by sales
80% of P5, 000 retail price since manager. The cost of consigned
we received them on goods amounts to P3,500.
consignment.
Required:
1. Prepare adjusting entries
2. If the unadjusted balance of accounts receivable is P250,000, how much is the correct balance
of the receivable after the following adjustments?
Problem 7 (Adapted)
In connection with your examination of the financial statements of Aguilar, Inc for the year ended
December 31, 2019, you were able to obtain certain information during your audit of the accounts
receivable and related accounts.
The December 31, 2019 balance in the Accounts Receivable control accounts is P788,000.
ompany B – P3,280
C
ompany C – P2,256
C P6,032 8,600
The ledger accounts have not been closed as of December 31, 2019. The Accounts Receivable control
account is not in agreement with the subsidiary ledger. The difference cannot be located, and you
decided to adjust the control account to the sum of the subsidiaries after corrections are made.
Questions:
Based on the above and the result of your audit, answer the following:
6. How much is the adjusted balance of Accounts Receivable as of December 31, 2019?
7. How much is the adjusted balance of the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts as of December 31,
2019?
8. How much is the net adjustment to the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts?
9. How much is the Doubtful Accounts expense for the year 2019?
10. How much is the net adjustment to the Doubtful Accounts expense account?
Problem 8 (ACQ)
Using the same information in the preceding problem, except the following:
An aging schedule of the accounts receivable as of December 31, 2019 is presented below:
0 to 1 month 380,960
P percent
1