Case 5-32&33
Case 5-32&33
Case 5-32&33
= 440000 $ \ 805000 $
= 0.5466
= 400000 $ \ 0.5466
= 732000 $ ( rounded )
b.
1. When the income before taxes is zero, income taxes will also be zero and net
income will be zero. Therefore, the break-even calculations can be based on the
income before taxes.
3. To determine volume of sales at which net income would be equal under either the
20% commission plan or the company sales force plan, we find the volume of sales
where costs before income taxes under the two plans are equal
X = Total sales revenue
0.65X +4800000$ = 0.525X + 7125000$
0.125X = 2325000$
X = 2325000$ \ 0.125
X = 18600000$
Thus, at a sales level of 18600000$ either plan would yield the some income before
taxes and net income. Below this sales level, the commission plan would yield the
largest net income: above this sales level, the sales force plan yiled the largest net
income.
4. A,B and C
5. We would continue to use the sales agents for at least one more year, and possibly
for two more years. The reasons are as follows:
First, use of the sales agents would have a less dramatic effect on net income.
Second, use of the sales agents for at least one more year would give the company
more time to hire competent people and get the sales group organized.
Third, the sales force plan doesn’t become more desirable than the use of sales
agents until the company reaches sales of 1860000$ a year. This level probably
won't be reached for at least one more year, and possibly two years.
Fourth, the sales force plan will be highly leveraged since it will increase fixed costs
and decrease variable costs. One or two years from now, when sales have reached
the 18600000 level, the company can benefit greatly from this leverage. For the
moment, profits will be greater and risk will be less by staying with the agents, even
at the higher 20% commission rate.