Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Case 5-32&33

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Majde Qasem (120192712) CASE 5–32&33

1- The overall break-even sales can be determined using


the CM ratio.

Velcro Metal Nylon Total


Sales 165000 $ 300000 $ 340000 $ 805000 $
Variable expenses 125000 $ 140000 $ 100000 $ 365000 $
Contribution Margin
Fixed expenses 400000
Net operating income 40000 $

CM ratio = Contribution margin \ Sales

= 440000 $ \ 805000 $

= 0.5466

Dollar sales to break-even = Fixed expenses \ CM ratio

= 400000 $ \ 0.5466

= 732000 $ ( rounded )

2- The issue is what to do with the common fixed cost when


computing the break-even for the individual products .
The correct approach is to ignore the common fixed costs.
If the common fixed costs are included in computations ,
the break-even points will be overstated for individual
products and managers may drop products in fact are
profitable.
Majde Qasem (120192712) CASE 5–32&33

a. The break-even points can be computed using the


contribution margin approach as follows :

Velcro Metal Nylon


Unit selling price 1.65 $ 1.50 $ 0.85 $
Variable cost per unit 1.25 0.70 $ 0.25 $
Unit contribution margin (a) 0.40 $ 0.80 $ 0.60 $

Product fixed expenses (b) 20000 $ 80000 $ 60000 $


Unit sales to break even (b)\(a) 50000 100000 10000

b.

Velcro Metal Nylon Total


Unit Sales 50000 100000 100000
Sales 82500 $ 150000 $ 85000 $ 317500 $
Variable expenses 62500 70000 25000 157500
Contribution margin 20000 $ 80000 $ 60000 $ 160000
Fixed expenses 40000 $
Net operating loss 240000 $

hence, the overall loss of the company is 240000$

In the case the company sales the break-even quantity of each


product, each product will show zero segments net income and
the common fixed expense will remain as a net operating loss
Majde Qasem (120192712) CASE 5–32&33

15% commission 15% commission Own Sales Force


Sales 16000 $ 100% 16000$ 100% 160000$ 100%
Variable expenses
Manufacturing 7200 7200 720000
Commission 2400 3200 120000
Total variable expenses 9600 60% 10400 65% 840000 52.5%
Contribution margin 6400 40% 5600 35% 760000 47.5%
Fixed expenses
Manufacturing overhead 2340 2340 234000
Marketing 120 120 252000**
Administrative 1800 1800 172500***
Interest 540 540 54000
Total fixed expenses 4800 4800 712500
Income before income 1600 800 47500
taxes
Income taxes(30%) 480 240 14250
Net income 1120$ 560$ 332.50$
** 120000$ + 2400000$ = 2520000$

***1800000$ - 75000$ = 1725000$

1. When the income before taxes is zero, income taxes will also be zero and net
income will be zero. Therefore, the break-even calculations can be based on the
income before taxes.

a. Break-even point in dollar sales if the commission remains 15%


Dollar sales to break-even = fixed expenses \ CM ratio
= 4800000$ \ 0.40
= 12000000$
b. Break-even point in dollar sales if the commission remains 20%
Dollar sales to break-even = fixed expenses \ CM ratio
= 4800000$ \ 0.35
= 13714286$
c. Break-even point in dollar sales if the company employs its own sales force
Dollar sales to break-even = fixed expenses \ CM ratio
= 7125000$ \ 0.475
= 15000000$

2. In order to generate a 1120000$ net income, the company must generate


1600000$ in income before taxes. Therefore
Dollar sales to attain target = target income before taxes + fixed expenses \ CM ratio
= 1600000$ + 4800000$ \ 0.35
= 6400000$ \ 0.35 = 18285741$
Majde Qasem (120192712) CASE 5–32&33

3. To determine volume of sales at which net income would be equal under either the
20% commission plan or the company sales force plan, we find the volume of sales
where costs before income taxes under the two plans are equal
X = Total sales revenue
0.65X +4800000$ = 0.525X + 7125000$
0.125X = 2325000$
X = 2325000$ \ 0.125
X = 18600000$
Thus, at a sales level of 18600000$ either plan would yield the some income before
taxes and net income. Below this sales level, the commission plan would yield the
largest net income: above this sales level, the sales force plan yiled the largest net
income.

4. A,B and C

15% 20% Own


Commission Commission Sales Force
Contribution margin (a) 6400000$ 5600000$ 7600000$
Income before taxes (b) 1600000$ 800000$ 475000$
Degree of operating leverage 4 7 16
(a)\(b)

5. We would continue to use the sales agents for at least one more year, and possibly
for two more years. The reasons are as follows:

First, use of the sales agents would have a less dramatic effect on net income.

Second, use of the sales agents for at least one more year would give the company
more time to hire competent people and get the sales group organized.

Third, the sales force plan doesn’t become more desirable than the use of sales
agents until the company reaches sales of 1860000$ a year. This level probably
won't be reached for at least one more year, and possibly two years.

Fourth, the sales force plan will be highly leveraged since it will increase fixed costs
and decrease variable costs. One or two years from now, when sales have reached
the 18600000 level, the company can benefit greatly from this leverage. For the
moment, profits will be greater and risk will be less by staying with the agents, even
at the higher 20% commission rate.

You might also like