The History of Feminism and Doing Gender in India
The History of Feminism and Doing Gender in India
The History of Feminism and Doing Gender in India
1590/1806-9584-2018v26n358567
Special Section
Rekha Pande1
1
University of Hyderabad, School of Social Sciences, Department of History and
Centre for Women’s Studies, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
The Histor
Historyy of FFeminism
eminism and Doing
Gender in India
Abstract: The present paper looks at the historical background of the rise of feminism and
women’s movement and doing gender in India. Not only in India but all over the world there has
been a close link between feminism and the women’s movement, each inspiring and enriching
the other. In the Indian context, while the women’s movement is a much earlier phenomenon, the
term Feminism is a modern one. Feminism comprises a number of social, cultural and political
movements, theories and moral philosophies concerned with gender inequalities and equal
rights for women. In the pre-independence era, the women’s movement began as a social reform
movement in the 19th century. At this time, the western idea of liberty, equality and fraternity was
being imbibed by our educated elite through the study of English and the contact with west. This
western liberalism was extended to the women’s question and was translated into a social reform
movement. In the post-Independence period during the first few decades, the major concern was
for overall economic growth. This was immediately followed by another decade, which witnessed
an increased concern for equity and poverty alleviation. Gender issues were subsumed in poverty
related concerns and there were no such specific programs, which aimed at women. In the post-
independence period, the women’s movement has concerned itself with a large number of
issues such as dowry, women’s work, price rise, land rights, political participation of women, Dalit
women and marginalized women’s right, growing fundamentalism, women’s representation in the
media etc. and a large number of Non-Government organizations have taken up this issue.
Women’s studies and now Gender studies is also an off shoot of the long history of women’s
movement in India. Various women’s studies Centres have been set up and today again these are
at the brink of disappearing from the radar and there is a struggle which is now going on. Though
a lot needs to be achieved and there are various impediments in making this reality available to
a large section of women, the women’s movement has brought women’s issues center stage and
made them more visible.
Keywords: Women’s Movement; Feminism; Subordination; Freedom Struggle; Non-Government
Organization
The present paper looks at the historical background of the rise of feminism and
women’s movement and what doing gender has entailed in the Indian context. Not only in
India but all over the world there has been a close link between these three, each inspiring
and enriching the other. In the Indian context, while the women’s movement is a much earlier
phenomenon, the term Feminism is a modern one. Feminism comprises a number of social,
cultural and political movements, theories and moral philosophies concerned with gender
inequalities and equal rights for women. Any basic definition of Feminism or Feminisms can
start with the assertion that at the center of feminism is the concerns for women’s subordinate
status in society and with the discrimination encountered by women because of their sex.
Furthermore, feminists call for changes in the social, economic, political or cultural order to
reduce and eventually overcome this discrimination against women and creation of an
equitable society in which gender justice is achieved. This has been achieved throughout
the world through movements and the establishment of Institutions. India has had both.
While the women’s movement is a much earlier phenomenon, the term Feminism is a
modern one. This term seems to have been first used in 1871 in a French medical text to
describe a cessation in development of the sexual organs and characteristics in male patients
who are perceived as suffering from “feminization” of their bodies (Geneviève FRAISSE, 2002
[1995]). The term was then picked up by Alexander Dumas, a French writer, republican and
anti-Feminist to describe women who behaved in a supposedly masculine way. The term
became widely used in the mid 19th century when the Women’s right movement emerged in
the United States of America with the Seneca Falls Convention of 1848. This was followed by
the writings of Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Mary Wollstonecraft, who questioned many
injustices met out to women. Hence the term Feminism emerged long after the women started
questioning their inferior status and demanding an amelioration of their social position.
Many groups were not comfortable with the use of the term feminist and did not identify their
struggle for women’s right with this term. Many believed that Feminism betrayed its anti-
capitalist roots in favor of identity politics: it failed when the focus shifted “from society to the
individual.” It was argued that what was once collective action and a shared vision for how
women might work and live in the world gave way to a focus on individual history and
achievement, and an unwillingness to share space with people with different opinions,
worldviews, and histories (Jessa CRISPIN, 2017). The same kind of arguments against the use
of the term feminism was made in India too (Madhu KISHWAR, 1999). Today feminist as a term
is understood to denote the political stance of someone committed to changing the social
position of women.
Feminism comprises a number of social, cultural and political movements, theories
and moral philosophies concerned with gender inequalities and equal rights for women.
One can clearly see the history of feminism as consisting of three waves. The apparent
pattern of rise and fall of feminism over time has led to the wave analogy, the peaks and
troughs of the feminist movement are characterized as following the motion of tidal waters,
with its ongoing cycle of gradual swelling, eventual cresting and final subsiding (Jane
PILCHER; Imelda WHELEHAN, 2004, p. 52). The first wave was in the mid nineteenth and early
twentieth centuries, primarily concerned with gaining equal rights for women, particularly
the rights to suffrage. In Britain the Suffragettes campaigned for the women’s vote. In 1918 the
Representation of the People Act 1918 was passed granting the vote to women over the age
of 30 who owned houses. In 1928 this was extended to all women over eighteen (Melanie
PHILLIPS, 2004). The second wave was in the 1960s and 1970s when protests were centered
around women’s inequality not only in the context of women’s political rights but in the areas
of family, sexuality and work. Second-wave Feminism has existed continuously since then,
and continues to coexist with what is termed third-wave Feminism.
meant to equip them to be self-sufficient, independent and emancipated and train them to
follow some profession but to be good housewives, the mistress of the home and the hearth
(PANDE; J. KAMESHWARI, 1987).
The social reform movement had its own paradox: on the one hand there was a
preoccupation with western ideas to emulate, assimilate or reject; on the other hand there
was also the element of revivalism or a need to reassert and reinforce a cultural identity
distinct from the British colonizers. Besides seeking reforms through legislation, education was
seen as an important means of changing women’s situation (Geraldine FORBES, 1981).
Women’s education, which saw its beginnings, now was visualized for creating appropriate
wives for the men of the newly emerging westernized elite (Vina MAZUMDAR,1972). Women
also joined in struggle against colonialism, but while they were encouraged to participate
by leaders like Gandhi, their work in the struggles was just an extension of their domestic
work. Very few women were allowed to join the front ranks with men, and the ones that did
spoke of the isolation they felt at times (Radha KUMAR, 1993, p. 4). As a form of backlash to
these new ideas that colonialism brought to India, women’s roles were being pushed to a
more traditional way of life. Women traditionally became emblematic of tradition, and the
reworking of tradition is largely conducted through debating the rights and status of women
in society (Kumkum SANGARI; Vaid SURESH,1989, p. 90). On account of this common view on
women, whenever culture is being threatened an immediate response is an enforcement of
women to remain in roles that are more traditional.
One is certainly not belittling the contributions of the social reform movement. In spite
of its limitations, it cannot be denied that the social reform movement did help in removing
prejudices against women’s education and provided a secular space for women in the
public realm. The only space available to a woman earlier was in the religious sphere and
in the ancient period, Buddhism and Jainism provided this space, but women had to choose
between this and the family and if they chose religion they had to move out of the families by
becoming a part of the Sangha. In medieval period the bhakti movement declaring that
God dwells in each individual and one could attain God through faith and many of the
bhakti saints brought religion to the downtrodden and henceforth marginalized sections of
society and women. Bhakti provides women a space and to move out of the daily life of
patriarchal control and in the process they get their independence. For all these women
bhaktas the rejection of the power of the male figurewhom they were tied to in subordinate
relationship became the terrain for struggle, self assertion and alternative seeking. Yet the
women saints had to choose between marriage and a life of domesticity and their love of the
supreme God (PANDE, 2005a, p. 281-282).
The social reform movement provided a secular space for women in other areas by
looking at various issues which were culturally imposed on women by society and making
them crippled. Raja Ram Mohan Roy argued that sati was not supported by shastras and
was nothing less than female murder. He argued against polygamy and for property rights for
women. Ravindra Nath Tagore submitted a memorandum to the Legislative council for the
removal of legal disabilities of remarried Hindu widows and the establishment of girl’s schools
in every suburb of Calcutta. Keshav Chandra Sen was instrumental in getting the Native
Marriage Act passed in 1872, which forbade early marriage between boys under 18 and
girls under 14; it also forbade polygamy and encouraged widow marriage. It allowed inter-
caste marriages for those who declared that they did not belong to any recongnized faith.
Ishwar Chandra VidyaSagar also was very critical of the system of early marriage and
supported literacy for women; many women’s organizations also took up these reforms.
Pandita Rama Bai’s Sharda Sadan (1892) in Poona, Shri
Mahipatramrupramanathashram in Ahmedabad (1892), Shri Zorastrian Mandal in Bombay
(1903), maternity and child welfare league in Baroda (1914), BhaginiSamaj in Poona (1916)
all were established and worked with the particular objective of improving the lot of women
and removing the various ills in society. These regional organizations were followed by
national organizations like Women’s Indian Association (1917), the National Council of Women
in India (1920), All India Women’s Conference (1926) which went on to organize 12 women’s
conferences till 1937 and Federation of University Women in India (1920), with the sole
objective of stimulating the interests of women in civic and public life and the removal of
disabilities of women whether legal, economic or social and the promotion of social; civil,
moral and educational welfare of women and children (FORBES, 2000).
came to the front and took charge of the struggle. Women had always been there of course,
but now there was an upsurge of them, which took not only the British government but their
own men folk by surprise. Here were these women, of the upper or middle classes, leading
sheltered lives in their homes, peasant women, working women pouring out in tens and
thousands in defiance of government order and police lathi. It was not only their display of
courage and daring but what was even more surprising was the organizational power they
showed. This was also the first time in Indian history when a large mass of women were
mobilized for political purposes in a mass organization. Many of the women felt that their
struggle was two pronged. They were fighting not only the British overlords but they had to
fight against patriarchy in their homes too.
education for women’s equality. A national perspective plan for women was released in
October 1988. The SAARC decade plan of action focused on the girl child (2000).
The Report pointed that the deep foundation of inequality is built in the minds through
a socialization process, which continues to be extremely powerful. If education was to promote
equality it must make a deliberate, planned and sustained effort. The educational system
had not even attempted to undertake this responsibility. UGC (University Grants Commission),
which was the nodal authority of higher education then, sent letters suggesting the starting of
a program of Women’s Studies and incorporating them in the curricula of Social Sciences for
teaching and research. Many conferences, workshops and discussion groups took place to
formulate clear guidelines, in order to help Universities, faculties, colleges and other institutions
of higher learning to start such units.
The Towards Equality Report also raised the question of the Uniform Civil Code,
appealing to earlier arguments but also squarely in the context of gender equity and justice.
“The absence of the Uniform Civil Code, in the last quarter of the twentieth century, twenty-
seven years after independence, is an incongruity that cannot be justified with all the emphasis
that is placed on secularism, science and modernism. The continuance of various personal
laws which accept discrimination between men and women violates the fundamental rights”
(GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, 1975, p. 142). In India, we have a criminal code that is equally
applicable to all, irrespective of religion, caste, gender and domicile. However, a similar
code does not exist especially with respect to divorce and succession and we are still
governed by the personal laws. These personal laws are varied in their sources, philosophy
and application. Thus, a major constraint arises while bringing people governed by different
religions under one roof.
In the post Independence period during the first few decades, the major concern was
for overall economic growth. This was immediately followed by another decade, which
witnessed an increased concern for equity and poverty alleviation. Gender issues were
subsumed in poverty related concerns and there were no specific programs which aimed at
women (GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, 1985). Women during this period were involved in such
movements as the anti price, law and famine relief movement but did not start to pick up
issues involving their oppression as women until the 1970’s. Now increasingly there has been
an emphasis on the promotion of Non-Governmental, grassroots level organizations (NGO’s)
for women’s development. Some of these organizations have varied in their scope, objectives
and vision but they have nevertheless provided women avenues of collectively voicing their
concerns. These grass root organizations have questioned the welfare approach to women
whereas they are primarily seen as beneficiary or recipients of programs and instead
incorporated an empowerment participatory approach. While questions about the success
of these organizations are often raised, it is often seen that women exposed to some amount
of mobilization show great potentialities, receptiveness and defining capacities (Narayan
BANERJEE, 1992).
3. 1975 to Present
Since 1975, there has been a steady increase in the number of women’s welfare
organizations in India. There were various issues that the Women’s movement took up during
this period against Liquor (PANDE, 2005c; PANDE, 2002), missing girl children (PANDE, 2004b),
violence against women (PANDE et al., 2008), to name a few. Dalit women’s and marginalized
women’s rights, growing fundamentalism, women’s representation in the media have also
been taken up by the Women’s movement. From mid to late 1980s, women’s groups
concentrated on providing services to individual women to enable them to gain advantages
already given in law. This is significantly different from the welfare dispensed by earlier
women’s groups. The earlier groups sought amelioration; the new groups sought recognition
and realization of rights (Flavia AGNES, 1992). Some of the important women’s organizations
in this period included, SEWA, National Commission of Women (New Delhi), National Council
of Women (Pune), Joint Women’s Program (Delhi), Kali for Women (Delhi) and several others.
Self Employed Women’s Association (SEWA) was founded by the Civil Rights leader Ela
Bhatt. Its aim is to provide full employment and self-reliance to women. Its aim for its workers is
to be able to hold against tyranny from employers or the state and provide social security.
Social security includes basic services that provide protection to workers and promote their
wellbeing. It is the means through which workers can make their lives secure, safe and productive.
It is an economic support to them. In fact, it is an economic security, as with these services and
protection their economic situation is safeguarded. Once they have some social security, they
do not slip deeper and deeper into poverty. A National Commission for Women was also set up
on 31 January 1992. It hears complaints from women on refusal of rights, cruelties and other
atrocities and redresses their grievances. In the post-independence period, the women’s
movement has concerned itself with a large number of issues such as dowry, violence against
women, women’s work, price rise, land rights, political participation of women, etc.
In the post-independence period there has not been any dearth of documents as far
as women are concerned. We can see various shifts in position with regards to policy approach
to women. There has been a shift from welfare to development to integrating women in
development, of the earlier decades to empowerment in the present. The 73rd and 74th
amendments of 1993 to Indian constitution, providing for reservation of seats for women in
panchayats and municipalities, are a giant stride in the empowerment of women. With 33%
reservation for women in rural and urban local bodies, fifteen years down the line today we
have 1.2 million elected women representatives in the institutions of local governance in
rural India (GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, 2008). Yet we are also witness to the hurdles and obstacles
placed in passing the Bill providing for reservation in the Parliament. It is a well-known fact
that the Parliament is a policy making body and the panchayati only an implementing one
and hence the delay. The setting up of the National commission has also helped in creating
an environment for the realization of women’s equality.
There has been a progressive increase in the plan outlays over the last six decades of
planned development to meet the needs of women and children. The outlay of Rs.4 crores in
the First Plan (1951-56) has increased to Rs.7, 810.42 crores in the Ninth Five Year Plan, and
Rs.13, 780 crores in the Tenth Five Year Plan. There has been a shift from “welfare” oriented
approach in the First Five Year Plan to “development “and “empowerment” of women in the
consecutive Five Year Plan. The Central Social Welfare Board (CSWB) undertook a number of
welfare measures through the voluntary sector. The programs of women were implemented
through the National Extension Service Programs through Community Development Blocks.
Since the Second Five Year Plan (1956-61), efforts were geared to organize Mahila Mandals
(women’s groups) at grass roots levels to ensure better implementation of welfare schemes.
Third, Fourth, Fifth and other interim Plans (1961-74) accorded high priority to women’s
education. Measures to improve maternal and child health services, and supplementary
feeding for children, nursing and expectant mothers were also introduced. But it is the Sixth
Five Year Plan (1980-85) which adopted a multidisciplinary approach with a three-pronged
thrust on health, education and employment of women. In the Seventh Five Year Plan (1985-
90), the developmental programs for women were continued, with the objective of raising
their economic and social status and to bring them in to the mainstream of national
development. A very significant step therein was to identify and promote “beneficiary-oriented
Programs”, which extended direct benefits to women.
It was the Eighth Five Year Plan (1992-97) which brought about a shift from ‘development’
to ‘empowerment’ by introducing special programs. The flow of benefits to women in the
three core sectors of education, health and employment were monitored vigorously. Women
were enabled to function as equal partners and participants in the developmental process
with reservation in the membership of local bodies. Some major initiatives undertaken during
the Eighth Plan for women included the setting up of the National Commission for Women to
work towards safeguarding the rights and interest of women, and of Rashtriya Mahila Kosh to
meet the micro credit needs of poor and assetless women. Other initiatives included the
adoption of a National Nutrition Policy in conformity with the Constitutional commitment to
ensure an adequate nutritional standard for the people, the launching of the Mahila Samridhi
Yojana to promote thrift activities amongst women and of Indira MahilaYojana basically for
awareness generation and the economic empowerment through self-help groups. The Ninth
Five Year Plan (1997-2002) envisaged: the empowerment of women and socially
disadvantaged groups such as Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward
Classes and Minorities as agents of socio-economic change and development. Promoting
and developing people’s participatory institutions like Panchayathi Raj institutions,
cooperatives and self-help groups was also taken up. The Tenth Five Year Plan (2002-2007)
was formulated to ensure requisite access of women to information, resources and services,
and advance gender equality goals. It spoke of the need for gender Budgeting. The Eleventh
Five Year Plan (2007-2012) proposed to undertake special measures for gender empowerment
and equity. The Ministry of Women and Child Development would make synergistic use of
gender budget and gender mainstreaming process. The Twelfth Five Year Plan (2012-2017)
focused on four key aspects, viz., health, education, urbanization and governance. It also
focused on single women, particularly those who are single by choice, and provided
assistance under various government schemes. It also emphasized that special provisions
be made with regard to education, for there are multiple factor that hinder women and girls
from developing their full potentials such as lack of income, unsafe environment in the
schools, curriculum not attuned to women’s needs etc. It also emphasized that Gender Studies
should be incorporated into the academic curriculum.
The introduction of Women’s Studies into the university system has been a path breaking
event for social scientists and other scholars who want to see a comprehensive and balanced
presentation of our social reality. Women’s Studies is viewed as an instrument for social and
academic development that will help the university community and the society at large
acquirea better understanding of the multi-dimensional roles played by women and look
into the causes for gender disparity (PANDE, 2004a, p. 54). For the past few decades, the
world community is focusing on the issues concerning gender disparity leading to serious
social imbalances. The education system all over has responded by establishing Women’s
Studies to develop new scholarship and a body of studies from the perspective of women.
Across the world today Women Studies have continued to critically engage with the
notion of power and to radically transform the intellectual landscape. There has been
recognition that knowledge is also a form of capital, to which some individuals and groups
have better access than others. This then becomes a source of power for exerting control. As
a result, social structural inequalities of race, nation, class, caste or gender correlate with
asymmetries in the production, reproduction and deployment of social scientific knowledge
(Patricia UBEROI, 1993, p. 244). Fundamental to feminism is the premise that women have
been left out of codified knowledge, where men have formulated explanations in relation to
themselves and have generally rendered women invisible or classified them as deviant. The
description and analysis of women as autonomous human being has been one of the most
significant contribution made by feminism (Cheris KRAMARAE; Dale SPENDER, 1993). The
emphasis on a feminist perspective meant a realization of power relations inherent in current
knowledge frameworks and practice in terms of who has access to that knowledge, how it
was distilled and eventually how meaning was encoded (SPENDER, 1981). Though feminism
has made critical use of past male theories despite their gender blindness, it was recognized
that it was necessary to develop feminist theories and concepts which saw women as primary
to theorizing. But it meant not being content with this but opening a new world.
Women’s Studies in the Indian context is a study of women. Does this mean that
women have not existed or been studied before? What is different here is that it is demarcated
as a scientific enquiry and this enquiry has an approach that has been much different from
all preceding ones because its purpose is different. This purpose has emerged from a particular
conjunction of events that pushed women’s concerns into public attention (Maithreyi
KRISHNARAJ, 1988).
and to grapple with measures for remedying it. One major field of activity that was identified
was education, both towards increasing women’s literacy and knowledge as well as
education on women’s concerns and social positions. The First National Conference of
Women’s Studies was held in Bombay and highlighted some of these concerns and tried to
define women’s studies. This meeting also led to the birth of the Indian Association of Women’s
Studies – a national organization that seeks to bring together academics, activists, policy
makers and administrators in the cause of women’s development. It has ever since sought to
focus the attention of the nation, particularly its educational agencies, on the need to promote
better understanding of women’s issues. The UNESCO Meeting of experts on women’s studies
and social sciences in Asia, held in New Delhi in 1982, defined Women’s Studies in terms of
the objectives that such studies sought to achieve. These included promoting a better and
balanced understanding of our societies and how they are responding to the process of
change. It aimed to contribute to the pursuit of human rights and to assist men and women
in understanding, recognizing and giving due importance to the roles actually played by
women and men. Such studies should also help in investigating the causes of disparity,
analyzing structural factors in addition to attitudinal and cultural factors. It also meant to
empower women in their struggle for equality and for an effective presence in all areas of
society and development. Finally these studies should attempt to make the invisible women
visible and in particular the women from the most unprivileged strata (UNESCO Report, Samya
Shakti, 1983).
poverty and discrimination. The current configuration of the centers is such that there are
differences among them in their age group, skills, location within the University in terms of the
universities own priorities as well as in leadership. Today these Centers’ primarily role is
knowledge assimilation and knowledge transmission through teaching, research, field action
and documentation. They fulfill several related and complimentary roles for the academic
community as well as for the activists, policy makers and policy implementers (PANDE, 2005b,
p. 126).
Today there are 163 Centres of Women’s Studies spread across the country. The UGC
has recognized the interventionist role played by these Centers by initiating gender
perspectives in many domains, in the generation of knowledge, in the field of policy design
and practice. These Centers were designed to act as catalysts for promoting and strengthening
women’s studies through teaching, research, action, field work and extension. It recognized
the role of these centers in contributing to the visibility of women’s issues, tried to combine
erudite knowledge with socially relevant theories and success in opening up a dialogue in
multi-disciplinary collaborations (PANDE, 2013, p. 6).
However, again today, as we write this article there have been some new developments.
There was a circular which stated that the Women’s Studies Centers will not be receiving any
funding after the end of the 12th Plan. Uncertainties regarding what would happen after the
end of the 12th Plan in March (along with the end of such plans in general) were temporarily
allayed when on the 29th of March the UGC issued a public notice stating that all existing
Plan schemes would continue for the fiscal year 2017-18. However, on the 16th of June, UGC
published a revised notice (dt 9th June) that ongoing schemes under the Plan Head would
continue and expenditures therein would be admitted only up to September 2017. By
September 2017 the UGC is planning to close these by withdrawing or suspending support.
There has been a lot of activism around this issue. The Indian Association of Women’s Studies
(IAWS) is planning to take a mass delegation to the HRD Minister, lobbying with MPs from all
parties during the monsoon session of Parliament and build a movement against this step.
These centers need to be strengthened and supported in financial and intellectual terms,
rather than this summary withdrawal of support.
Hence, to conclude, it is the women’s movement in India that has been the force
behind the long struggle of women’s advancement from subordination to gender equality
and finally to women’s empowerment. The cause for women’s freedom was first espoused by
enlightened males who had imbibed liberal ideas. Up to the twenties of the last century the
struggle was carried on by men and women followed. It was only after Gandhiji’s entry into
politics, when the nationalist movement under his leadership was transformed from a middle
class movement into a mass movement, that women themselves for the first time raised their
voice against the disabilities from which they suffer and questioned and struggled against
not only the British rule but patriarchy itself. In the process, women secured many rights and
social freedom and realized many other rights as grants. Though a lot still needs to be
achieved and there are various impediments in making this reality available to a large
section of women, the women’s movement has brought women’s issues center stage and
made them more visible, contributing immensely towomen’s struggle for equality.
References
AGNES, Flavia. “Protecting Women Against Violence? Review of a Decade of Legislation,
1980-1989”. Economic and Political Weekly, v. 27, n. 17, 1992, p. 19-33.
BANERJEE, Narayan. Grassroots Empowerment. Center for Women’s Development Studies,
New Delhi, 1992. (Mimeographed)
BOLOTIN, Susan. “Voices of the Post-Feminist Generation”. New York Times Magazine, 1982.
CRISPIN, Jessa. Why I Am Not a Feminist: A feminist Manifesto. New York: Melville House, 2017.
DU BOIS, Ellen Carol. Harriot Stanton Blatch and the Winning of Woman Suffrage. New Haven:
Yale University Press, 1997. Also see http://scholar.alexanderstreet.com/pages/
viewpage.action?pageId=2259. Accessed on 27/03/2009.
FORBES, Geraldine. “The Indian Women’s Movement: A struggle for Women’s Rights or National
Liberation?”. In: MINAULT, Gail (Ed.). The Extended family. New Delhi: Chankya Publication,
1981. p. 49-82.
______. Women in Modern India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
FRAISSE, Geneviève. “As quoted”. In: FREEDMAN, Jane. Feminisms. New Delhi: Viva Books,
2002 [1995].
GILLIS, Stacy; HOWIE, Gillian; MUNFORD, Rebecca (Ed.). Third Wave Feminism: A Critical
Exploration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA. Ministry of Education and Social Welfare. Towards Equality. Report of
the Committee on the Status of Women in India. New Delhi, 1975.
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA. Ministry of Panchayati Raj. Study on Elected Women Representatives
in Panchayati Raj Institutions. New Delhi, 2008.
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA. Ministry of Social Welfare. Department of Women and Child
Development. Women in India – A Country Paper, 1985.
HANISCH, Carol. “The personal is political”. In: AGEL, Jerome. The radical therapist. New York:
Ballatine Books, 1971. p. 152-157.
ÍNDIA. Constituição. Artigo 15, número 3. “Nada neste artigo impedirá o Estado de fazer
qualquer provisão especial para as mulheres e crianças”, 1949. Disponível em: http://
www.estudos-biblicos.net/const-india.html.
KISHWAR, Madhu. Off the Beaten Track Rethinking Gender Justice for Indian Women. New
Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1999.
KRAMARAE, Cheris; SPENDER, Dale (Ed.). The Knowledge Explosion: Generation of Feminist
Scholarship. London: Harrvester Wheatsheaf, 1993.
KRISHNARAJ, Maithreyi. “How has Women’s Studies been Defined”. Workshop on definition of
Women’s Studies. Bombay: Tata Institute of Social Science, September, 1988.
(Mimeographed)
KUMAR, Radha. History of Doing. New Delhi: Kali for Women, 1993.
MAZUMDAR, Vina. Education and social change: three studies in 19th Century Bengal. Shimla:
Indian Institute of Advanced Studies, 1972.
PANDE, Rekha. “Centre for Women’s Studies – a Tool for Women’s Empowerment”. University
News, New Delhi, v. 43, n. 47, 2005b, p. 124-130.
PANDE, Rekha. “Engendering University Curricula and Teaching Women’s Studiesin India – a
Critical Evaluation”. In: The Indigenization of Women’s Studies Teaching – The Asian
Experience, Beijing, 2004a. p. 52-82.
PANDE, Rekha. “Mapping the Terrain of Activism in The Feminist and The Women’s Movement
in India”. Labrys, etudes féministes/Estudos Feministas, Special Issue on Indian Feminism,
2015.
PANDE, Rekha. “Solidarity, Patriarchy and Empowerment – Women’s Struggle against Arrack
in India”. In: RICCIUTELLI, Luciana; MILES, Angela; McFADDEN, Margaret M. (Ed.). Feminist
Politics, Activismand Vision, Local and Global Challenges. New York: Zed Publications,
2005c. p. 212-226.
PANDE, Rekha. “The Girl Child in India”. Review of Women’s Studies, v. XIV, n. 2, p. 149-173,
2004b.
PANDE, Rekha. “The public face of a private domestic violence”. International Feminist Journal
of Politics. U.K., Rutledge, v. 4, n. 3, 2002, p. 342-367.
PANDE, Rekha. “Women’s Studies: An Institutional Experiences.” Women’s Link, v. 19, n. 2, p. 2-
9, 2013.
PANDE, Rekha. “Feminism and the Women’s Movement in India: A Historical Perspective”.
Journal of Women’s Studies, Bangalore, v. 1, n. 1, 2009, p. 22-39.
PANDE, Rekha. Religious Movements in Medieval India. New Delhi: Gyan Publishing House,
2005a.
PANDE, Rekha et al. “Narratives of domestic violence, reconstructing Masculinities and
Feminities”. In: SINGH, Manjit; SINGH, D. P. (Ed.). Violence – impact and intervention. New
Delhi: Atlantic Publishers and Distributors, 2008. p. 121-140.
PANDE, Rekha; KAMESHWARI J. “Women’s Discourse on Education” (a preliminary reading of
the speeches delivered at the Annual Conferences of the Andhra Mahila Sabha in 1913
and 1914). Proceedings of Indian History Congress. Goa: PIHC, 1987. p. 390 396.
PANIKKAR, K. N. “Presidential Address” (Section III). Proceedings of the Indian History Congress,
v. 36. Aligarh: PIHC, 1975.
PHILLIPS, Melanie. The Ascent of Woman: A History of the Suffragette Movementand the Ideas
Behind It. London: Abacus, 2004.
PILCHER, Jane; WHELEHAN, Imelda. 50 Key Concepts in Gender Studies. New Delhi: Sage
Publications, 2004.
POLLITT, Katha. Reasonable Creatures: Essays on Women and Feminism. New York: Vintage
Books, 1995.
ROSEN, Ruth. The World Split Open: How the Modern Women’s Movement Changed America.
New York: Viking, 2000.
SANGARI, Kumkum; SURESH, Vaid (Ed.). Recasting Women: Essays in Colonial History. New
Delhi: Kali for Women, 1989.
SNDT WOMEN’S UNIVERSITY. Report of the First National Conference on Women’s Studies.
Bombay, 1981.
SPENDER, Dale. Men’s studies modified: the impact of feminism on the academic disciplines.
Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1981
UBEROI, Patricia. “Reciprocity in Social Science: Gender Issues”. The Indian Journal of Social
Science, v. 6, n. 3, 1993.
UNESCO Report. “Samya Shakti”. Women Studies and Social Sciences in Asia: Report of a
Meeting of Experts. New Delhi, 1983.
[Received on 08/08/2018
and accepted on 22/08/2018]