Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 20 views

    Opposition To Nullity of Marriage

    Uploaded by

    bobbyricky
    This document is an opposition filed by respondent Chris Galang to petitioner Arman Galang's petition for nullification of their marriage. It states that Arman and Chris were married on April 30, 2007 and have a six-month-old daughter named Amanda. It argues that the marriage license used was still valid on their wedding date under the 120-day rule, so the marriage is valid. The opposition asks the court to deny the petition for nullification.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Opposition To Nullity of Marriage

    Uploaded by

    bobbyricky
    20 views3 pages
    This document is an opposition filed by respondent Chris Galang to petitioner Arman Galang's petition for nullification of their marriage. It states that Arman and Chris were married on April 30, 2007 and have a six-month-old daughter named Amanda. It argues that the marriage license used was still valid on their wedding date under the 120-day rule, so the marriage is valid. The opposition asks the court to deny the petition for nullification.

    Original Title

    Opposition to Nullity of Marriage.doc

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document is an opposition filed by respondent Chris Galang to petitioner Arman Galang's petition for nullification of their marriage. It states that Arman and Chris were married on April 30, 2007 and have a six-month-old daughter named Amanda. It argues that the marriage license used was still valid on their wedding date under the 120-day rule, so the marriage is valid. The opposition asks the court to deny the petition for nullification.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    20 views3 pages

    Opposition To Nullity of Marriage

    Uploaded by

    bobbyricky
    This document is an opposition filed by respondent Chris Galang to petitioner Arman Galang's petition for nullification of their marriage. It states that Arman and Chris were married on April 30, 2007 and have a six-month-old daughter named Amanda. It argues that the marriage license used was still valid on their wedding date under the 120-day rule, so the marriage is valid. The opposition asks the court to deny the petition for nullification.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    Maria Christina E.

    Gaviola, 3B

    Republic of the Philippines


    REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
    National Capital Judicial Region
    Makati-Branch 143

    SP No. 341143
    ARMAN GALANG,
    Petitioner.

    - versus -

    CHRIS GALANG,
    Respondent.
    x ---------------------------------------- x

    OPPOSITION
    [TO THE PETITION FOR THE DECLARATION OF NULLITY OF MARRIAGE ]

    RESPONDENT, by counsel, respectfully opposes the motion of plaintiff for

    declaration of nullity of marriage, and in support of such opposition do hereby states:

    1. Respondent is a Filipino citizen, of legal age, currently employed at

    married to petitioner. She may be served with summons and other pertinent orders

    and processes of this Court at 44 Rockwell Village, Makati City.

    2. Petitioner is a Filipino citizen, of legal age and married to respondent.

    For purposes of this petition, he may be served with notices and other pertinent

    processes through counsel at 501 OMG Building, Jupiter Street, Makati City.

    3. Petitioner and respondent were married on 30 April 2007 and out of

    this marriage, they have one (1) child, Amanda Galang who is six (6) months old. A

    copy of the Marriage Contract executed by petitioner and respondent is attached as

    ANNEX A, while a copy of Amanda’s birth certificate is attached as ANNEX B.


    4. The marriage license used when they were married was issued on 1

    January 2007 and is valid only for one hundred twenty (120) days.

    5. Petitioner’s application of the one-hundred-twenty-day rule is

    erroneous. The correct application of the Rule is to exclude the first day and include

    the last day. Therefore, as of 30 April 2007, the 30 th day from the date of the

    marriage license issuance, the said license was still valid. Thus, the marriage of

    petitioner and respondent is likewise valid.

    PRAYER

    WHEREFORE, it is respectfully prayed that Petitioner ARMAN

    GALANG’s petition for Declaration of Nullity of Marriage be denied.

    Other just and equitable reliefs are also prayed for.

    Makati City, 18 February 2008.

    ALLAN SHORE
    Counsel for Respondent
    Makati City Hall,
    Makati City

    COPY FURNISHED:

    DODONG PAWIKAN
    Counsel for Defendant
    15th Floor Sagittarius Building
    H.V. dela Costa Street, Salcedo Village
    Makati City

    2
    JUSTIFICATION ON SERVICE BY MAIL

    Pursuant to Sec. 11, Rule 13 of the Rules of Court, defendants Orion I, Felipe
    U. Yap, David C. Go, Yuen Po Seng, Daisy Parker and Ronald P. Sugapong
    respectfully manifest that a copy of this Opposition was served by registered mail in
    lieu of personal service because of the distances involved unavailability of
    messengers and for reasons of economy.

    ALLAN SHORE

    You might also like