fm3-100 4 PDF

FM 3-100.
4
MCRP 4-11B
Environmental
Considerations in
Military Operations
DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

FM 3-100.4
C1
Change 1 Headquarters
Department of the Army
Washington, DC, 11 May 2001
Environmental Considerations in
Military Operations
1. Change FM 3-100.4, 15 June 2000, as follows:
Remove old pages Insert new pages
iii through vi iii through vi
2. A bar star (¶) marks new or changed material.
3. File this transmittal sheet in front of the publication.
DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
By Order of the Secretary of the Army:
ERIC K. SHINSEKI
General, United States Army
Chief of Staff
Official:
JOEL B. HUDSON
Administrative Assistant to the
Secretary of the Army
0110913
DISTRIBUTION:
Active Army, Army National Guard, and US Army Reserve: Electronic Means Only.
*FM 3-100.4
MCRP 4-11B
Field Manual Headquarters

No. 3-100.4 Washington, DC
Marine Corps Reference Publication Headquarters

No. 4-11B United States Marine Corps
Washington, DC
15 June 2000
Environmental Considerations in Military Operations

CONTENTS
Page
PREFACE .................................................................................................................................. iv
INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... vi
CHAPTER 1 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND MILITARY OPERATIONS ............... 1-1
Background.................................................................................................................. 1-1
Context of Environmental Protection ............................................................................ 1-1
The Army and Marine Corps Environmental Strategies ............................................... 1-5
Environmental Responsibilities .................................................................................... 1-9
Summary ................................................................................................................... 1-18
CHAPTER 2 PLANNING: INTEGRATING ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS.......... 2-0
The Military Decision -Making Process.......................................................................... 2-0
Environmental-Specific Planning ............................................................................... 2-10
The Risk Management Process ................................................................................... 2-15
Summary ................................................................................................................... 2-25
CHAPTER 3 TRAINING: INTEGRATING ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION S ........... 3-0
Battle Focused Training ............................................................................................... 3-0
Environmental Specific Training and Resources ........................................................... 3-5
Summary ..................................................................................................................... 3-6
CHAPTER 4 OPERATIONS: INTEGRATING ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS...... 4-0
Implications for Military Forces.................................................................................... 4-0
Environmental Protection During Military Operations ................................................. 4-2
Environmental Protection Operational Principles......................................................... 4-4
Summary ..................................................................................................................... 4-6
CHAPTER 5 BASE SUPPORT OPERATIONS ....................................................................... 5-0
Environmental Program Areas ..................................................................................... 5-1
Installation and Facility Responsibilities...................................................................... 5-3
* Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.
i
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
Page
Support Planning and Execution ......................................................................................... 5-8
Unit and Installation Environmental Assistance ............................................................. 5-13
Summary ............................................................................................................................. 5-14
CHAPTER 6 ESTABLISHING AND ASSESSING A UNIT PROGRAM..................................... 6-1
Environmental Compliance.................................................................................................. 6-1
Establishing a Unit-Level Program ..................................................................................... 6-3
Program Assessment .......................................................................................................... 6-11
Unit Self-Assessment.......................................................................................................... 6-12
Summary ............................................................................................................................. 6-17
CHAPTER 7 HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT.................................................................... 7-0
Background ........................................................................................................................... 7-0
Environmental and Occupational Health Hazards ............................................................ 7-1
Risk Management ................................................................................................................. 7-3
Summary ............................................................................................................................... 7-5
APPENDIX A Environmental Regulations, Laws, and Treaties ................................................. A-0
Sources of Environmental Laws and Regulations ............................................................. A-0
Army/Marine Corps Regulations, Orders, and Pamphlets................................................ A-1
Federal Laws ....................................................................................................................... A-4
Executive Orders................................................................................................................ A-17
State Laws .......................................................................................................................... A-19
Local Laws .......................................................................................................................... A-19
Host Nation Law/Final Governing Standards ................................................................. A-19
International Laws and Treaties ...................................................................................... A-20
Environmental Compliance Enforcement ........................................................................ A-21
APPENDIX B Environmental Appendix to the Engineer Annex ................................................ B-0
APPENDIX C Unit Environmental Standing Operating Procedure (SOP) ................................ C-0
APPENDIX D Sources of Environmental Assistance.................................................................... D-0
BASOPS/Supporting Installation Staff Assistance............................................................ D-0
Sources of Assistance During Tactical Operations ............................................................ D-2
Other Sources of Assistance ................................................................................................ D-3
APPENDIX E Environmental Planning Guidelines ..................................................................... E-1
Pre-Operations Guidelines .................................................................................................. E-1
Guidelines During Operations ............................................................................................ E-3
Post-Operations Guidelines................................................................................................. E-6
APPENDIX F Risk Management Worksheet .................................................................................F-1
APPENDIX G Practical Application of Assessing Environmental-Related Risk ........................ G-0
Step 1 – Identify (Environmental) Hazards ....................................................................... G-0
Step 2 – Assess (Environmental) Hazards ......................................................................... G-1
Step 3 – Develop Controls and Make a Decision................................................................ G-1
Step 4 – Implement Controls............................................................................................... G-2
Step 5 – Supervise and Evaluate ........................................................................................ G-2
Summary .............................................................................................................................. G-2
ii
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
APPENDIX H Unit Environmental Self-Assessment....................................................................H-1

GLOSSARY. ........................................................................................................................... Glossary-1
REFERENCES .................................................................................................................. References-0
INDEX......................................................................................................................................... Index-0
iii
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
PREFACE
PURPOSE
This field manual (FM) guides the United States (US) Army and the US
Marine Corps (USMC) in applying appropriate environmental protection
procedures during all types of operations. It also provides basic techniques
and procedures for units at the company, battalion, and brigade/regiment
levels. This manual states the purposes of military environmental protection,
a description of legal requirements, and a summary of current military
programs. It also describes the growing strategic significance of
environmental factors in the twenty-first century. As a unit procedures
manual, it describes how to apply risk management methods to identify
actions that may harm the environment and appropriate steps to prevent or
mitigate damage. Appendixes provide references, formats, practical
applications, checklists for self-assessment, and sources of assistance.
SCOPE AND APPLICABILITY
This doctrine applies to all Army and Marine Corps commanders and staffs
(and other Department of Defense (DOD) units/staffs operating under their
command authority) responsible for planning and executing operations. It
applies to all soldiers and Marines as well-disciplined stewards of the natural
resources of this country and protects, within mission requirements, the
environment in every area of operations (AOs). For overseas theaters, this
doctrine applies to US unilateral operations and US forces in multinational
operations, subject to applicable host nation (HN) laws and agreements.
Finally, it applies to support provided by the Logistics Civil Augmentation
Program (LOGCAP).
¶USER INFORMATION
Unless this publication states otherwise, masculine pronouns do not refer

exclusively to men.
The short synopses of laws and regulations contained herein are meant to
provide only a thumbnail sketch of the laws and regulations described and
are not inclusive of all requirements.
This publication is intended only to improve internal management of the

Army and USMC and is not intended to create any right or benefit,
substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by any party against the US, its
agencies, its officers, or any person.
The proponent of this publication is HQTRADOC. Send comments and

recommendations on Department of the Army (DA) Form 2028
(Recommended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms) and forward it
iv
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
directly to Commandant, US Army Engineer School, ATTN: ATSE-DOT-DI,

320 MANCEN Loop, Suite 370, Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri 65473-8926.
v
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
INTRODUCTION
The military’s primary mission is to win this nation’s wars through the
application of overwhelming combat power. Warfare, by its very nature, is
destructive to humans and their natural environment. Environmental damage is
a consequence of combat. However, the commander in the field is often required
to restrict the application of force. He must conform to the law of land warfare:
those written and unwritten conventions and customs that protect against
unnecessary suffering and facilitate the restoration of peace. He is, with
increasing frequency, constrained by mission requirements that may restrict the
use of much of the combat power inherent in his organization.
The US military has historically exercised restraint, even in general war. For
example, during World War II in Europe, the military was ordered to limit
damage to works of art, churches, monuments, archives and libraries, whenever
possible, without endangering troops or mission. Field commanders incorporated
this information into their standard decision-making process and made
judgments based on military necessity. As the military looks into the next
century, and even today, military units should try to avoid unnecessary
environmental damage, not only in training, but also across the spectrum of
operational missions. A mission’s success may be determined by political or
socio-economic stability, both of which are affected by environmental factors and
resources. The Army and USMC must be able to identify ways to protect the
natural environment while executing the full range of their missions by doing the
following:
• Considering the environment in planning and decision-making in

conjunction with other essential considerations of national policy.
• Protecting the environment of home stations and training areas as a

means of retaining resources for mission purposes.
• Using environmental risk assessment and environmental management

principles to integrate environmental considerations into mission
performance.
• Instilling an environmental ethic in soldiers and Marines.
• Understanding the linkages between environmental protection issues and

their associated impact on safety, force protection, and force health
protection.
Military environmental protection is the application and integration of all aspects

of natural environmental considerations, as they apply to the conduct of military
operations.
vi
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
The above actions identify environmental protection as an important undertaking

to be considered in conjunction with mission planning and execution. Through
planning and execution, the Army and Marine Corps include environmental
considerations and address them appropriately across the entire spectrum of
operations.
FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE
Military actions, at the dawn of the twenty-first century, are undergoing

revolutionary changes in methods, weapons, and even strategic objectives.
Extraordinary advances in technology accompanied by a historically
unprecedented growth in global population have dramatically altered the
characteristics and demands of the battlefield. Soldiers and Marines must be
prepared to respond across the “entire operational spectrum, from
humanitarian to combat” and the four operational categories (offense,
defense, stability, and support operations), sometimes within the same
operation. Deployed forces must be able to conform to the environmental
protection requirements of the theater commander without impairing combat
effectiveness.
This requirement is new and fundamentally different from the traditional,

organized application of violence that is the core of military capability. It
stems from mankind’s capacity to cause irreparable harm to vital natural
resource systems and our growing understanding of the consequences of such
damage. The environmental resources of these natural systems, such as
clean air, water, land, forests, and wildlife, were once considered limitless.
Today, it is clear that these resources are limited and require protection.
Where they are scarce, they are increasingly significant to economic well-
being and human health.
In regions where increasing numbers of people occupy a finite and densely

crowded area, urbanization, migration, public health, and refugees are factors
of growing strategic importance. In these circumstances, environmental
resources may assume a substantial role in conflict origin and resolution. US
land forces will increasingly operate in, or near, urban environments. For
example, US forces may conduct stability operations and support operations
(FM 100-5) to establish order in the aftermath of an insurgency or civil war, a
failed government, or lawlessness. Shortages of basic resources such as clean
water, food, and fuel will complicate the mission. Thus, environmental
resources can be operational, as well as strategic, factors.
United States land forces must be versatile and capable of rapid deployment
to perform the full range of missions from humanitarian to total war. Recent
operations have shown that they must also be flexible within the strategic or
operational mission. For example, units may execute combat operations,
limited in time or space, within the context of larger stability operations.
They must also be able to apply environmental protection measures
appropriate to the situation.
National recognition of environmental threats to the population’s safety and

well-being has inspired laws, regulations, and international agreements.
vii
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
American citizens value and demand a clean and healthy environment. US

military forces do not function independently of political policy and the
desires of the people; they reflect national values and obey the laws.
Therefore, the US military have developed skills and programs for
environmental protection.
Integration between civilian and military application of environmental

protection is essential. This manual devotes itself to demonstrating how this
integration can be relatively seamless as it melds into the existing processes
within the Army and Marine Corps. Integration of military environmental
protection is an evolutionary, rather than a revolutionary adaptation of our
current military processes. The concept must become second nature for each
soldier and Marine. Linking good environmental actions to sound tactical
doctrine and tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTP) can and should be the
standard. Environmental considerations will, in many cases, reinforce or
amplify sound tactical principles and issues of force protection that the
military already accepts as doctrine or TTP for other reasons. Military
environmental protection is tied directly to risk management and the safety of
soldiers and Marines. It is an enabling element for the commander, and as
such, an essential part of military planning, training, and operations.
HOW TO USE THIS MANUAL
The sequence of chapters in the manual are set up to help you understand
what military environmental protection is and how to apply it by providing:
• General knowledge.
• Planning guidance.
• Training guidance.
• Operations guidance.
• Guidance on how to interface with the installation and respective

staff positions.
• Guidance on establishing and assessing a unit program.
• Guidance on the impact of environmental conditions on the health of

service members.
The appendixes provide a more in-depth look at information that supports

the chapters. In general, they are designed to provide a starting point or
template for the products that soldiers and Marines will require as they build
their unit program and operate during planning, training, and all operations
across the spectrum of conflict.
viii
Chapter 1
Environmental Protection and Military Operations

“An emerging class of transnational environmental issues are increasingly
affecting international stability and consequently will present new
challenges to US strategy.”
National Security Strategy, July 1994
The US military’s primary mission is to defend the US—its people, its

land, and its heritage. National security strategy now includes specific
environmental security concerns. Strategic and operational end states
support lasting victories. End states include environmental components.
Additionally, the American people expect the Army and Marine Corps to
manage the financial, human, and natural resources entrusted to them in
a responsible manner. The policy and vision of the Army and Marine
Corps on these issues, as well as your responsibilities as leaders, are
critical to understanding how to address military environmental
protection.
BACKGROUND
1-1. Strategic factors influencing international security and stability have

dramatically changed. Global population and industrial activity have grown
geometrically, and technological advancement has accelerated. These
phenomena have begun to shift the foundations of strategic analysis,
fundamentally altering the relationships between the human population and the
supporting natural resources. Operational Terms and Graphics (FM 101-5-
1/MCRP 5-2A) defines the natural environment as “the human ecosystem,
including both the physical and biological systems that provide resources (i.e.,
clean air, clean water, healthy surroundings, sufficient food) necessary to sustain
productive human life. Included in the natural environment are manmade
structures, such as water and waste water treatment facilities and
natural/cultural resources”.
CONTEXT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
1-2. Conflict caused or aggravated by resource scarcity is not new. What was
once a local or regional problem may now extend globally. Resource scarcity
could reduce the ability of governments to respond to the basic needs of their
people. The resulting instability can threaten regional security and lead to
armed interventions.
1-1
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES AS A CAUSE OF CONFLICT
1-3. Strategic resources (i.e., minerals, oil, or coal) have often been catalysts of
conflict. The widespread distribution and product substitution associated with a
global economy tend to mitigate scarcity. Renewable or “sustainable” resources—
such as clean air, water, croplands, or forests—are more difficult to replace and
can be a regional catalyst of instability.
1-4. Environmental degradation, natural disasters, famines, health epidemics,

and changes in climate can threaten a nation’s economy and send populations
across borders as refugees. For example, construction of a series of dams on the
Senegal River made river-bottom farmland suitable for high intensity
agriculture. Mauritian Moors abandoned cattle production in their degraded
grazing areas to migrate to the river valley where a struggle ensued over the
farmland. In a similar situation, soil degradation and population growth in
Chiapas, Mexico generated peasant migrations to upland hillsides. Population
overload, combined with the lack of capital to protect the local ecosystem, caused
severe environmental resource scarcity.
1-5. In both examples, environmental resource scarcity, caused by degradation

or depletion of renewable resources, encouraged groups to capture these
resources or migrate to find adequate resources. Environmental resources can
contribute to the potential for conflict when they become environmental threats
or strategic goals.
Environmental Threats
1-6. Environmental threats intensify regional instability. In Haiti, dwindling

resources were central to the social collapse of the island nation. Almost totally
deforested, its poor croplands were divided into smaller and less productive
parcels with each generation. Haiti’s population of seven million, already
unsustainable by every measure, is expected to double in the next 18 years.
1-7. Environmental threats to stability and security might result from acts of
war or terrorism (i.e., the destruction of infrastructure facilities providing water
or fuel). The threats (i.e., polluting the rivers or air that flow into another
country) may also result from the routine activities of an industrial society.
1-8. The actions associated with developing a national infrastructure, such as

building a dam, which cuts off water to downstream neighbors, may contribute to
regional instability and conflict. Regional environmental threats can trigger
events leading to conflict or deepening poverty. These types of situations
encourage citizens to seek violent solutions.
1-9. Security from these environmental threats includes protective measures for
natural resources; safety measures for soldiers/Marines whether at home station
or deployed; and offensive, defensive, and support actions when required to meet
national security goals. Environmental threats will confront theater commanders
in the form of natural resource issues as strategic and operational factors before,
during, and after future conflicts.
1-2
National Strategic and Security Interests
1-10. Resources such as minerals, oil, and water often possess strategic
significance. Access to sufficient energy supplies is of vital national interest to a
nation when it becomes industrialized. The importance of resources was
certainly demonstrated in the actions that the US and other nations took to form
a coalition and conduct the actions associated with Desert Shield and,
subsequently, Desert Storm.
1-11. Water has been a strategic resource since the beginning of recorded history.
In the Middle East, three or more countries share all of the major river basins.
Each of these countries now faces the possibility of severe water scarcity during
the next decade and beyond.
1-12. In the West Bank, population growth in the Jordan River basin increased
demand for the scarce supply of freshwater. Overpumping the aquifers depleted
the water supply and degraded some aquifers by causing saltwater intrusion
from the Mediterranean. Because 40 percent of Israel’s groundwater originates
in the former occupied territories, Israel sought to protect its water supply by
limiting water use during the occupation of the West Bank. The stringent
restrictions on water use imposed upon Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon became
another point of tension in the conflict during the 1960s to 1970s. Although the
intensity of that issue has been moderated, it continues to be a major concern.
1-13. Countries rely on natural resources to achieve political ends. A country

overexploiting its own resources by deforestation or polluting a neighboring
country’s air or water may cause corresponding increases in regional tensions.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AS A NATIONAL ETHOS
1-14. As outlined in FM 100-1, the nation’s ethos translates into national policy,
national security strategy, and military strategy. The US has often been the first
nation to search for solutions to environmental problems. Americans believe
continued environmental degradation presents a potential short- and long-term
threat to their safety and well-being. They have demanded and supported
national and international environmental protection efforts.
1-15. As environmental protection becomes increasingly important to Americans,

it assumes a growing significance to operational readiness. US military forces
must maximize environmental compliance and restoration efficiency to preserve
funds for force structure, modernization, and training.
1-16. Operational readiness depends on sufficient land for training individuals

and units. The Army and the Marine Corps manage large training and testing
areas, which are increasingly valuable as part of a diminishing inventory of
undeveloped land. Often, the health of the surrounding natural ecosystem also
depends on the natural habitat of these training or testing areas. Fortunately,
protecting and preserving these undeveloped spaces serves the interests of both
operational readiness and the natural habitat. Good conservation techniques
preserve training areas for future military use and reduce compliance and
restoration costs.
1-3
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AS AN IMPACT ON SAFETY, FORCE PROTECTION, AND

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
1-17. Environmental protection tends to be viewed according to its effect on the

natural environment. While this focus is appropriate, it is essential to
understand the linkages between the effect on the environment and their
associated impacts on safety, force protection, and force health protection as
these effect soldiers and Marines. These linkages are identified in FM 100-10,
FM 100-14, medical doctrine (FM 8-10, FM 8-55, FM 21-10, FM 21-10-1, see
Chapter 7), and an increasing number of other doctrinal manuals. The term
military environmental protection includes the understanding of this linkage.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AS A REGULATORY REQUIREMENT
1-18. Heightened environmental concern has led all federal agencies, including
the DOD, to consider the environmental consequences of proposed actions to
avoid costly litigation and remediation requirements. Compliance with
environmental laws and regulations is now a necessary cost of doing business.
The Army and the Marine Corps comply with all environmental laws and
regulations applying to installations or theaters of operation (TOs).
1-19. The sources of environmental laws influencing the actions of US military

forces include federal, state, local, and HN laws, as well as international treaties.
Appendix A provides an overview of the key environmental laws, regulations and
treaties applicable to unit level operations. These come from a variety of sources
to include federal, state, local host nation, executive order, Department of
Defense policies and directives, and international agreements.
ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS AS A FUNCTION OF ARMY VALUES
1-20. From every philosophical or moral perspective, environmental stewardship

is the right thing to do. As more demands are made on the shrinking resource
base, the ethical issues become clearer. The US military has always accepted and
internalized its role as a moral, as well as a physical force. Senior leaders must
create ethical climates in which subordinate leaders recognize that the natural
resources of the earth are not inexhaustible, and they must take responsibility to
protect the environment. FM 22-100 defines ethics as principles or standards
that guide professionals to do the moral or right thing. To help subordinates live
according to Army values, leaders enforce rules, policies, and regulations. This
ethical climate is the same climate that guides the decisions to be made in areas
such as the law of land warfare. Ethical behavior is not restricted to merely
following the letter of the law when it comes to specific written laws, regulations,
and treaties. It captures the ethos that caused those laws to be generated in the
first place. By educating subordinates and setting the example, leaders enable
their subordinates to make ethical decisions that, in turn, contribute to
excellence.
1-21. Considering the environmental effects of training, operations, and logistics

activities reduces environmental damage and costs. Habitually protecting the
environment ensures that land will continue to be available to conduct realistic
training and that environmental problems will not disrupt operations.
Environmental protection must be recognized in material acquisition procedures,
1-4
training, and facilities operations. In short, it must be an institutional and

personal ethic. To be successful, soldiers and Marines must practice pollution
prevention as a proactive measure rather than just a mere compliance or reaction
to laws and regulations. “Doing the right thing is good. Doing the right thing for
the right reason and with the right intention is even better” (FM 22-100).
“Everyone must protect and conserve the natural environment as an

individual responsibility. Seemingly minor infractions by individuals,
particularly in cumulative effect, can have major effects on human health
and natural habitat—or upon operating budgets. Leaders must set the
example as well as to strictly enforce environmental policy and
regulations. Environmental responsibility involves all of us. The
environmental ethic must be part of how we live and how we train.”
General Dennis Reimer, 1995, Chief of Staff, US Army
THE ARMY AND MARINE CORPS ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES
1-22. Governmental rules and regulations do in fact influence the strategies of

the Army and Marine Corps. Therefore it is important for subordinate
commanders to understand the commander’s guidance from his respective chain
of command. Success will be achieved through the commitment of the chain of
command, as well as organizing for success, spreading the environmental ethic,
training and educating the force, prioritizing resources, and harnessing market
forces by purchasing environmentally benign materials whenever possible. A
discussion of the rules and regulations is provided in Appendix A.
MISSION STATEMENTS
1-23. “The Army will develop and implement cost-effective measures to protect
and sustain the environment in support of military operations, installation
management, and materiel development.”
1-24. “The two most important national functions of the Marine Corps are to
make Marines and win battles. Training is integral to the performance of these
functions. By respecting and maintaining the natural resources entrusted to the
Marine Corps, the training opportunities enjoyed by today’s Marines will be
available to future generations of Marines.”
VISION STATEMENTS
1-25. “The Army will integrate environmental values into its mission to sustain
readiness, improve the soldier’s quality of life, strengthen community
relationships, and provide sound stewardship of resources.”
1-26. “Marine Corps environmental programs enhance military readiness, protect

the health of military and civilian personnel living and working abroad Marine
corps installations, and protect the environmental quality of the installation and
adjacent communities to support future activities.”
1-5
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
“The Marine Corps shall actively protect and enhance the quality of the
environment through strict compliance with all applicable regulatory
requirements.”
MCO P5090.2A
“The Army is committed to environmental stewardship in all actions as

an integral part of the Army mission.”
AR 200-1
ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP GOALS
1-27. Environmental protection is no longer the province of a few technical

experts. It requires soldiers and Marines to prevent environmental problems by
caring for those resources entrusted to them by the American people. This
responsibility includes financial, material, and environmental stewardship.
Environmental stewardship, the wise use and management of environmental
resources, is a natural outgrowth of the military’s role as protector of US national
security. The following are goals for responsible environmental stewardship:
• Demonstrating leadership in environmental protection and improvement,

including pollution prevention.
• Ensuring that consideration of the natural and cultural environment is

an integral part of decision-making.
• Minimizing adverse natural environment and human health impacts

while maximizing readiness and strategic preparedness.
• Initiating aggressive action to comply with all applicable federal, state,

local, and HN environmental laws.
• Supporting pollution prevention programs, which includes periodically

reassessing products and processes that generate pollution, reusing and
recycling materials, and avoiding hazardous waste (HW) generation.
• Managing all military controlled lands, natural and cultural resources,

and remediate areas contaminated by past activities.
• Enhancing outreach activities with local communities by openly

addressing environmental quality issues.
1-28. Everyone, from the commander in chief to the newest recruit and every
civilian employee, must apply stewardship to his area of responsibility. However,
implementing service-wide stewardship requires an environmental protection
strategy. The strategy’s goals and objectives focus on four pillars:
• Compliance - Give immediate priority to sustained compliance with

environmental laws.
• Prevention - Focus efforts on pollution prevention to reduce or eliminate

pollution at the source.
1-6
• Conservation - Conserve and protect natural and cultural resources so

they will be available for present and future generations to use.
• Restoration - Simultaneously continue to restore previously contaminated

sites as quickly as funds permit.
ENVIRONMENTAL PILLARS
1-29. The principal duty of soldiers and Marines is not protecting the
environment. However, they accomplish this requirement as part of their other
duties. In those rare instances where real or perceived conflict exists between
environmental protection and mission accomplishment, commanders and
individuals must make informed decisions. Unit commanders, leaders at all
levels, and individual soldiers/Marines must understand the pillars for
ARMY
MISSION
ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP
CONSERVATION
RESTORATION
COMPLIANCE
PREVENTION
LEADERSHIP
PEOPLE RESOURCES COMMUNICATION
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
SHARED VALUES
Compliance: Taking Care of Today’s Problems
1-30. The essence of compliance is obeying the law. Compliance includes all
activities that ensure operations and activities meet federal, state, local, and
applicable HN environmental requirements. These requirements include laws
and regulations for waste water discharge, noise abatement, air quality
attainment, and solid waste and HW management.
Prevention: Minimizing Problems for Tomorrow
1-31. Eliminating pollution at the source is usually much easier and less costly
than dealing with hazardous materials (HM) or their aftermath. Pollution is a
liability, and clean up is an overhead cost that must be controlled. Avoiding or
reducing pollution saves the military resources that will enhance readiness.
Pollution prevention includes all phases of the material management life cycle
from concept development to final disposition. Prevention is generally achieved
through the following:
• Reducing the amount of waste produced. This may include using smaller
amounts of toxic materials or replacing them with less toxic substitutes.
On a larger scale, it may include changing operating methods by
1-7
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
increasing efficiency or preventing accidents that generate waste and

residue.
• Reusing materials whenever possible. Reusing items is more cost

efficient than recycling. Reuse entails using an item in its current form.
Refilling containers, filtering solvents, or reusing subassemblies reduces
the amount of waste that must be treated and disposed.
• Recycling products. This entails changing the physical composition of the

item by melting it down or shredding it for use in other processes.
Recycling, while less efficient than reuse, may be the only alternative for
several types of waste. Many installations sponsor recycling programs to
support morale, welfare, and recreation activities.
Conservation: Sustaining Resources for the Next Generation
1-32. Conservation includes two types of resource management: controlled use

and preservation. Controlled use focuses on managing military land to ensure
long-term natural resource productivity. Preservation focuses on protecting
natural and cultural resources (to include endangered species) by maintaining
them in their current state. Renewable resources, such as timber or training
land, require controlled use. Nonrenewable resources, such as historic
monuments or endangered species, require preservation. The military must
balance these demands in a responsible effort to conserve natural resources and
still maintain readiness.
Restoration: Taking Care of Yesterday’s Problems
1-33. Restoration includes all activities necessary to clean up contaminated

military sites. Most military units do not perform restoration; normally,
environmental staffs and contractors perform this function. However, to make
installations safer and healthier places for soldiers, Marines, and their families,
the services are cleaning up contaminated sites. By following the principles of
the other three environmental strategies, soldiers and Marines help minimize the
need for restoration.
“Preventing environmental problems is always more cost-effective (in
dollars) than trying to clean them up after the fact. During the
deployment to Desert Shield, one installation spent $1,000,000 to clean up
HW improperly left behind by individuals in deploying units.
Environmental protection is the smart thing to do, and it is the right thing
to do.”
After-Action Report, Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm
Program Area Integration
1-34. The four environmental program areas—compliance, prevention,

conservation, and restoration—apply to all military activities. During
peacetime, they ensure that military lands are available for mission training;
during contingency operations or combat, they support strategic goals and
desired endstates. At all times, these program areas protect the safety and
health of soldiers/Marines, and their families.
1-8
ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES
1-35. Commanders, staffs, subordinate leaders, and soldiers/Marines must

understand their individual duties and responsibilities for environmental
protection and become environmental stewards. To practice stewardship, US
military personnel must understand the basic environmental management
responsibilities that apply to their work area or assigned duties.
UNIT RESPONSIBILITIES
1-36. Installation regulations or operational directives, such as operation plans

(OPLANs), operation orders (OPORDs), or contingency plans (CONPLANs),
generally define a unit’s environmental program. (See Appendix B for an
example of the Environmental Considerations Appendix to an Army plan).
Standing operating procedures (SOPs) usually establish a unit’s environmental
plan. (See Appendix C for an example SOP). These documents integrate
installation and operational requirements into daily routines. Unit-level
environmental management always includes guidance for commanders, staffs,
subordinate leaders, soldiers, and Marines.
Commanders
1-37. The commander’s role in environmental stewardship centers on instilling

an environmental ethic in their soldiers, Marines, and civilians under their
control. Commanders train their subordinate leaders on stewardship, counsel
them on doing what is right, lead by example, and enforce compliance with laws
and regulations. Sources of environmental assistance available to commanders
are identified in Appendix D.
1-38. Commanders will meet with key installation environmental personnel to

obtain information on and assistance with environmental protection issues to
include setting up a unit program. Commanders should also turn to these
personnel for detailed guidance on regulatory compliance, environmental
assessments, and to review environmental problems common to other
commanders on the installation or in the unit.
1-39. The primary point of contact should be located at the installation’s

environmental office. This office is normally part of the Directorate of Public
Works (DPW) at Army installations, the facilities or base engineer office on
Marine Corps installations, or the State Area Command (STARC) for the
National Guard.
“All Marine commanders should emphasize environmental awareness and

incorporate environmental compliance into every aspect of how they conduct
business, taking affirmative steps to make compliance happen.”
General J.L. Jones, Commandant, 1999
White Letter 03-99
1-9
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
“In my Commandant’s Planning Guidance (CPG), I presented a road map

that describes where I am leading the Marine Corps…
These Marine Corps principles are basic to our nature and critical to our
existence. These realities are not relative or subject to compromise. They
are inalterable and universally applicable.
Expressions of these principles may be found in the way we maintain our

installations, utilize our resources, and comply with our Nation’s laws
concerning the environment. Instituting good management practices,
conserving resources, and obeying the law have always been a part of our
moral character. Marines are good neighbors. Marines are efficient.
Marines are informed. Marines take care of their own. Marines are
disciplined.
In these days of public concern for the environment and diminishing

resources, we are afforded new opportunities to apply our Marine Corps
principles to new avenues of excellence. We will meet our responsibilities
by being exemplary world citizens as we maintain and improve our
position as the world’s premiere fighting force. That’s what’s expected of
us – we’re Marines.”
General C. C. Krulak, Commandant of the Marine Corps, 1997
1-40. The Directorate of Logistics (DOL) (Army) or the G-4 (Marine Corps), the
safety office, and the supporting Defense Reutilization and Marketing Office
(DRMO) may also provide commanders with environmental information.
1-41. When deployed, commanders will often deal with the phenomenon known
as the base camp. Base camps, while not installations, are comparable to small
towns and require many of the considerations applied to installations. A mayor
(often the headquarters, headquarters company [HHC] commander) assists the
base camp commander with control of base operations. A Base Camp
Coordination Agency (BCCA) will provide expertise and support to the
commander, largely through its subordinate Base Camp Assistance/Assessment
Team (BCAT). Environmental expertise is resident or aligned with this team
and available to support the base camp commander and the designated mayor of
the base camp, provide technical recommendations, and maintain appropriate
standards. More information about this phenomenon is provided in the recently
published Center for Army Lessons Learned (CALL) Newsletter 99-9, Integrating
Military Environmental Protection.
1-42. Army Regulation (AR) 200-1, Marine Corps Order (MCO) P5090.2A, the
Army’s Commander’s Guide to Environmental Management, and the Marine
Corp’s Commander’s Guide to Environmental Compliance and Protection specify
commanders’ environmental responsibilities. To carry out these responsibilities,
commanders do the following:
• Comply with an installation’s environmental policies and legally

applicable and appropriate federal, state, and local laws and regulations
or country-specific final governing standards (FGS) if outside the
continental United States (OCONUS).
1-10
• Demonstrate a positive and proactive commitment to environmental

stewardship and protection.
• Provide environmental training required by law, regulation, or command

policy.
• Ensure that all personnel can perform their duties in compliance with
environmental laws and regulations, and can respond properly to
emergencies.
• Promote proactive environmental measures and pollution prevention.
• Supervise compliance with environmental laws and regulations during

operational, training, and administrative activities.
• Include environmental considerations in mission planning, briefings,

meetings, execution, and after-action reviews (AARs). (See Appendix E.)
• Understand the requirements of Army/Marine Corps environmental

programs. (See Chapter 5.)
• Identify and assess the environmental risks of proposed programs and

activities. (See Chapter 2 and Appendixes F and G.)
• Coordinate unit activities with higher headquarters’ (HQs) environmental

elements.
• Appoint and train an environmental compliance officer (ECO) and an HW

coordinator for the unit.
• Ensure that SOPs contain all environmental considerations and

regulatory requirements appropriate for the level of command. (See
Appendix C.)
• Conduct environmental self-assessment or internal environmental

compliance assessments. (See Chapter 5 and Appendix H.)
• Understand the linkages between environmental considerations and their

associated impact on safety, force protection, and force health protection.
(See Chapter 7.)
Unit Staffs
1-43. Whether developing the staff estimate, protection levels, or environmental

baseline survey (EBS), environmental protection requires active participation
from each staff member. Environmental factors may affect or influence a wide
range of activities or require a significant expenditure of resources. A single
point of contact (POC) for all environmental considerations is neither effective or
efficient.
1-44. Unit staffs have inherent responsibilities within their areas of expertise
that require environmental actions. While some of these responsibilities may
1-11
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
depend on the command or commander, all staffs undertake many of them. Unit
SOPs at battalion and company levels incorporate specific responsibilities. Of
particular importance at the unit level is the Army ECO, and the Marine Corps
military occupational specialties (MOS) 9631 and 9954, addressed on page 1-16.
1-45. The unit staff also integrates environmental considerations into the
planning and execution processes. These staff officers have specific
environmental protection responsibilities. Common staff duties provide the basis
for some environmental responsibilities, while FM 101-5 provides a basis for
others. Additional staff officer environmental responsibilities are as follow:
Chief of Staff (CofS), Executive Officer (XO)
1-46. As the commander’s principal staff officer, the Chief of Staff (CofS) directs
staff tasks, conducts staff coordination, and ensures efficient and prompt staff
response. The CofS is responsible for supervising the staff’s integration of risk
management for all planning and the execution of operations. As a supervisor,
the CofS ensures all staff members analyze operational effects on the
environment and assess the environmental status as the G3 integrates
environmental planning and execution into operations in the same manner as
safety is integrated.
Coordinating Staff
1-47. Military services historically integrate planning factors into multiple staff
agencies to ensure operational coordination. With environmental considerations,
as with the protection of noncombatants, the command is best served when the
functional staff includes them in planning and execution. Coordinating staff
officers each have specific environmental protection responsibilities derived from
common staff duties, specific responsibilities of the position as described in FM
101-5, the coordinating responsibility of special staff officers. The following are
the principal environmental responsibilities of coordinating staff officers:
Assistant Chief of Staff, G1 (S1), Personnel
1-48. As the principal staff officer for all matters concerning human resources
and personnel, the G1 ensures that the command has the requisite expertise to
fulfill environmental requirements. Depending on the level of the command,
experts may include both military and civilian personnel. As the coordinating
staff officer for the surgeon, the staff judge advocate (SJA), and the public affairs
officer (PAO), the G1 coordinates environmental issues between them and across
the staff.
Assistant Chief of Staff, G2 (S2), Intelligence
1-49. As the staff officer responsible for conducting intelligence preparation of the
battlefield (IPB) and defining and characterizing the area of operation (AO), the
G2 is responsible for incorporating significant environmental factors. These
environmental factors are provided by the engineer coordinator (ENCOORD) and
other staff elements.
1-12
Assistant Chief of Staff, G3 (S3), Operations
1-50. The G3 is the principal staff officer for all matters concerning training,
operations, and plans. It the G3’s responsibility to ensure that any significant
collateral environmental damage caused by command directed operations is
understood and approved by the commander in the military decision-making
process (MDMP).
1-51. The G3 establishes and supervises the command training programs. These
programs include environmental skill and awareness training that support the
unit mission. He also ensures that the unit protects and maintains training
areas. As the overall ground manager and planner of troop movements,
bivouacking, and quartering, the G3 understands and considers environmental
vulnerabilities during operations.
1-52. The G3 may assign special missions to tactical units to secure and
safeguard critical environmental resources, such as wastewater treatment plants
in urban areas. When appropriate, the G3 prepares counterterrorism and
security plans to combat possible environmental sabotage. The G3 exercises
coordination staff responsibility over the ENCOORD, the leading special staff
officer for many environmental protection actions.
Assistant Chief of Staff, G4 (S4), Logistics
1-53. As the principal staff officer for coordinating the logistic integration of
supply, maintenance, and services for the command, the G4 oversees many
functions with a potential for generating HW. The G4 establishes procedures for
reducing and controlling HM. He recommends command policies for solid waste
and HW/HM disposal. The G4 also recommends command policies for pollution
prevention and, in coordination with the G3, oversees the preparation of spill
prevention and response plans.
1-54. In the exercise of staff planning and supervision of food, bath, and laundry
services, the G4 ensures that the staff exercises and implements appropriate
controls over wastes and effluents. The G4 is responsible for constructing
facilities and installations and for controlling real property, including EBSs, upon
occupation and redeployment.
1-55. The G4 coordinates property disposal actions such as disposal of HM and

HW (to include medical waste). The G4’s office tracks disposal actions on the
unit’s document register, prepares appropriate turn-in documentation, and
maintains turn-in receipts. To perform these actions, the G4 coordinates with
appropriate DOD activities—defense reutilization and marketing office (DRMO),
defense logistics agency (DLA), or the LOGCAP.
Assistant Chief of Staff, G5 (S5), Civil-Military Operations
1-56. As the principal staff officer for all matters concerning civil affairs, the G5
is familiar with the relationships between the local populace and their
environment. These relationships include elements of the underlying causes of
the conflict, threats to public health, and critical vulnerabilities to disruption of
environmental services such as clean water or useable croplands.
1-13
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
1-57. In conjunction with the SJA, the G5 advises the commander on his legal
obligations concerning the local populace. In many areas of the world, these
obligations include protecting critical environmental resources. He is responsible
(along with the SJA) for being familiar with local environmental laws, especially
in overseas deployment areas. The G5 may also supervise civil affairs units
assisting local governments with environmental protection services. He also
serves as the focus of coordination for HN support and indigenous labor and
coordinates with the SJA on civilian claims against the US government for
environmental damage.
Special Staff
1-58. Special staff officers have functional environmental responsibilities. The

following are the key special staff officers with environmental protection
expertise and responsibilities:
Surgeon
1-59. The surgeon advises the commander and the staff on regional health
matters within the commander’s area of interest. He advises on the effects of the
health threat, including environmental, endemic, and epidemic diseases. The
surgeon also has direct access to environmental, preventive medicine, and public
health services. He provides health risk assessment guidance to support the
commander’s risk management decision-making process. The surgeon relates the
effects of environmental hazards to the environmental health of soldiers and
Marines. In more demanding situations, he can rely on the capabilities of the
Theater Army Medical Laboratory (TAML) and the US Army Center for Health
Promotion and Preventive Medicine (USACHPPM) to assist him in providing
recommendations to the commander. The commander and the unit staff may call
on the surgeon to assist in determining the public health implications of damage
to critical environmental resources. See Chapter 7 for additional information on
health and the environment.
Chemical Officer
1-60. The chemical officer (CHEMO) is the special staff officer responsible for the
use of and requirement for chemical assets, NBC defense, and smoke operations.
A chemical officer is at every echelon of command. The CHEMO integrates
chemical reconnaissance assets to assist in performing site assessments. In
conjunction with the surgeon, the CHEMO advises the commander on possible
hazards (such as low-level radiation and toxic industrial material) and their
effects on personnel and equipment.
Engineer Coordinator
1-61. The ENCOORD is the special staff officer for coordinating engineer assets
and operations for the command. As the senior engineer officer in the force, the
ENCOORD advises the commander on environmental issues. Working with
other staff officers he determines the impact of operations on the environment
and integrating environmental considerations into the decision-making process.
The ENCOORD works with the G4 in performing site assessments for
installations and facilities. He and the SJA advise the commander on the
1-14
necessity for environmental assessments to meet HN or executive order (EO)

12114 requirements. The ENCOORD is also responsible for advising the G2/S2 of
significant environmental factors and ensuring these impacts are integrated into
the IPB process.
Transportation Officer
1-62. The transportation officer plans and supervises administrative movements.

When these movements contain HM or HW, he ensures that unit personnel
follow applicable laws and regulations. These requirements include: manifesting
cargo, inspecting loads, segregating loads, marking vehicles, and arranging for
hazardous cargo routes (as necessary).
Maintenance Officer
1-63. The maintenance officer plans and supervises maintenance and repair
activities. In many instances, these activities use significant quantities of HM
and generate HW. The maintenance officer ensures safe use, storage, and
disposal of these materials, that often includes operating temporary storage areas
for products such as used oils, contaminated fuels, paint residues, spill cleanup
residues, and solvents. Since maintenance personnel work with hazardous
chemicals, the maintenance officer must ensure that all personnel comply with
hazardous communications (HAZCOM) requirements.
Personal Staff
1-64. Some staffs have personal officers who work under the immediate control of
the commander and therefore have direct access to him. The commander
establishes guidelines or gives specific guidance to the personal staff officer who
informs, or coordinates with, the chief of staff or other members of the staff.
Staff Judge Advocate
1-65. The SJA advises the commander on compliance with environmental laws,
regulations, treaties, and conventions. He also writes or interprets status of
forces agreements (SOFAs). The SJA helps determine environmental assessment
requirements and manages civilian claims resulting from environmental damage.
He helps other staff officers to understand the legal aspects involved in their
respective specialties.
Public Affairs Officer
1-66. Public perceptions of environmental threats may be more significant to

mission accomplishment than the threat itself. The PAO advises the commander
on methods of conveying information to and responding to information from the
public. When deployed overseas, the PAO coordinates with appropriate staff and
commanders to plan and execute public relations efforts in support of mission
objectives. In the continental United States (CONUS), various environmental
laws require public involvement. The PAO identifies and prepares plans for
meeting these requirements.
1-15
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
Additional Duties
Environmental Compliance Officer (Army)
1-67. The key to fulfilling environmental requirements successfully at the unit

level is the ECO. AR 200-1 directs all Army unit commanders to “appoint and
train ECOs at appropriate levels to ensure compliance actions take place.” In
units where there is a staff officer with similar responsibilities, he will usually be
given this additional duty. In company-sized units, this duty will generally
translate into an extra duty. The ECO manages environmental issues within the
unit level and ensures environmental compliance. He also coordinates through
the respective chain of command with the supporting installation environmental
staff to clarify requirements and obtain assistance.
1-68. The ECO accomplishes environmental compliance requirements on behalf

of the commander. He also coordinates with supporting installation
environmental staff to clarify requirements and obtain assistance. While this
position of responsibility is not a formal staff position, the ECO is critical to the
commander’s environmental program. The ECO does the following:
• Advises the unit on environmental compliance during training,

operations, and logistics functions.
• Serves as the commander's eyes and ears for environmental matters.
• Coordinates between the unit and higher/installation headquarters’

environmental staffs.
• Manages information concerning the unit’s environmental training and

certification requirements.
• Performs unit environmental self-assessment inspections.
• Performs environmental risk assessments.
Environmental Engineer/Management Officer (Marine MOS 9631)
1-69. The 9631 MOS is assigned duties at many of the Corps’ major installations
and Major Subordinate Commands (MSCs). As a trained environmental
professional, the 9631 provides linkage between Commanding Generals/ Officers
and the civilian regulatory community. The 9631 can be a valuable asset in
planning operations and exercises by providing an environmental perspective
while maintaining mission awareness.
HW/HM Marine (MOS 9954)
1-70. The HW/HM Marine is the Marine Corps equivalent of the Army ECO.
Marines holding the MOS 9954 provide unit-level expertise regarding the safe
use of HMs and the environmentally compliant disposal of HW. Unit TOs reflect
the MOS as a “required additional” for designated line numbers. These Marines
have received formal training that meets federal requirements for HW handlers
and have the following general responsibilities:
1-16
• Coordinating and conducting unit-level environmental awareness

training in concert with the installation comprehensive environmental
training and education (CETEP) coordinator.
• Ensuring unit compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws
and regulations regarding HW/HM.
• Providing a link between unit commanders and installation-level

environmental staff.
• Providing advice to unit commanders regarding HW/HM.
1-71. Specific duties for both Marine Corps MOSs are fully outlined in the
current version of MCO P1200.7.
Subordinate Leaders
1-72. The role of leaders in environmental stewardship centers on building an

environmental ethic in their soldiers and Marines by training and counseling
subordinates on environmental stewardship, leading by example, and enforcing
compliance with laws and regulations. Leaders do the following:
• Communicate the Army/USMC environmental ethic to soldiers and

Marines while training them to be good environmental stewards.
• Develop and sustain a positive and proactive commitment to

• Identify environmental risks associated with individual, collective, and

mission essential task list (METL) task performance. (See Chapter 2.)
• Plan and conduct environmentally sustainable actions and training.
• Protect the environment during training and other activities.
• Analyze the influence of environmental factors on mission

accomplishment.
• Integrate environmental considerations into unit activities.
• Train peers and subordinates to identify the environmental effects of

plans, actions, and missions.
• Counsel soldiers and Marines on the importance of protecting the

environment and the possible consequences of not complying with
environmental laws and regulations.
• Ensure that soldiers and Marines are familiar with the unit SOPs, and
supervise their compliance with laws and regulations.
1-17
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
• Incorporate environmental considerations into AARs.
• Understand the linkages between environmental considerations and their

associated impact on safety, force protection, and force health protection.
(See Chapter 7.)
Soldiers and Marines
1-73. Soldiers and Marines have the inherent professional and personal
responsibility to understand and support their service’s environmental program.
They must do the following:
• Comply with environmental requirements in unit and installation SOPs.
• Maintain environmental awareness throughout daily activities.
• Provide recommendations to the chain of command on techniques to

ensure compliance with environmental regulatory requirements.
• Identify the environmental risks associated with individual and team

tasks.
• Support recycling programs.
• Report HM and HW spills immediately.
• Make sound environmental decisions based on guidance from the chain of

command, training, and personal concepts of right and wrong.
SUMMARY
1-74. National security strategy now includes specific environmental security

concerns. Environmental resources can and do contribute to the potential for
conflict when they become environmental threats or strategic goals.
Environmental protection and military operations go hand in hand. Strategic and
operational end states support lasting victories. End states include
environmental components. While locations and conditions will vary, the guiding
principles remain constant.
1-75. The Army environmental vision states, “The Army will develop and
implement cost effective measures to protect and sustain the environment in
support of military operations, installation management, and materiel
development.” The American people expect the Army and Marine Corps to
manage the financial, human, and natural resources entrusted to them in a
responsible manner. Compliance with environmental laws and regulations is
now critical to the future availability of environmental and training resources.
The Army and the Marine Corps comply with all environmental laws, regulations
and policies, and commander’s guidance applying to installations or TOs.
Considering the environmental effects of training, operations, and logistics
activities reduces environmental damage and costs. Commanders, staffs,
1-18
subordinate leaders, and soldiers/Marines must understand their individual

duties and responsibilities for environmental protection and become
environmental stewards. They must also understand the linkages between
environmental considerations and their associated impact on safety, force
protection, and force health protection.
1-76. With the conditions now established to allow us to look at integrating

environmental considerations into planning, we will apply this information to the
planning process for the MDMP and the associated application of risk
management as discussed in Chapter 2.
1-19
Chapter 2
Planning: Integrating Environmental Considerations
“The American people will continue to expect us to win in any

engagement, but they will also expect us to be more efficient in protecting
lives and resources while accomplishing the mission successfully.
Commanders will be expected to reduce the costs and adverse effects of
military operations, from environmental disruption in training to
collateral damage in combat.”
Joint Vision 2010

The integration of environmental considerations into planning is very
similar to the integration of safety and force protection issues. Whether
using the MDMP, or building a training plan, the requirement to integrate
environmental considerations into the planning process is critical. This
chapter discusses environmental planning and focuses on how and where
the Army integrates environmental considerations into the MDMP, as
specified in FM 101-5. While this process is Army specific, it is similar to
the process employed by the USMC. Each day leaders make decisions
affecting the environment. These decisions effect natural and cultural
resources entrusted to the Army and the USMC. These decisions also have
serious environmental and legal consequences for decision-makers. The
military’s inherent responsibility to the nation is to protect and preserve its
environmental resources—a responsibility that resides at all levels. Risk
management is an effective process to assist in preserving these resources.
Unit leaders identify actions that may negatively impact the environment
and take appropriate steps to prevent or mitigate damage. This chapter
illustrates how to use the risk management process to assess and manage
environmental-related risk during planning, training, and operations.
THE MILITARY DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
2-1. The MDMP (see Figure 2-1, page 2-2) is defined in FM 101-5. It
relies on doctrine, especially the terms and symbols (graphics) found in
Operational Terms and Graphics. The MDMP helps the commander and his
staff examine the battlespace and reach logical decisions. The process helps
them apply thoroughness, focus, sound judgment, logic, and professional
knowledge to reach a decision. From start to finish, the commander’s
personal role is central. His participation in the process provides focus and
guidance to the staff. The commander uses the entire staff during the MDMP
to explore the full range of probable and likely enemy and friendly courses of
action (COAs), and analyze and compare his own organization’s capabilities
2-0
with the enemy’s. This staff effort has one objective—to integrate
information collectively with sound doctrine and technical competence to
assist the commander in his decisions, ultimately leading to effective plans.
The selected COA and its implementing OPORD are directly linked to how
well both the commander and staff accomplish each phase of the MDMP.
NOTE 1: Commander may RECEIPT OF MISSION NOTE 2: Staff coordination

conduct phases independently or ✧ Issue cdr’s initial guidance is continual up and down.
in conjunction with staff. Warning
Order
MISSION ANALYSIS
✧
Approve restated mission
✧ cdr’s intent
State
✧ cdr’s guidance
Issue
✧
Approve CCIR Warning
Order
COA DEVELOPMENT
Commander’s Staff’s Estimates
Estimate (continual process)
COA ANALYSIS
(continual process) (War game)
COA COMPARISION
COA APPROVAL
✧ Approve COA
✧ Refine commander’s intent
✧ Specify type of rehearsal
✧ Specify type of order Warning
Order
✧ Commander’s
Responsibility ORDERS PRODUCTION
✧
Approve order
NOTE 3: For a discussion of NOTE 4: At any time during
rehearsals, execution, and REHEARSAL execution and assessment,
assessment, see Chapter 6 and situation may require the
Appendix G (FM 101-5). EXECUTION & ASSESSMENT process to start again.
Figure 2-1. The MDMP

2-2. This manual does not attempt to teach this process, but rather uses the
framework provided in FM 101-5 to discuss the application of environmental
considerations throughout the MDMP and highlight the critical steps for
environmental input. Environmental considerations are generally addressed
as functions of risk, much like the application of safety considerations. Risk
is expected. As with all other types of risk, leaders can effectively minimize
environmental-related risk while optimizing the unit’s capacity to remain
responsive and agile. When the command and control (C2) system places
timely, comprehensive, quality information in front of the decision-
maker, leaders are able to mitigate risk and maximize performance. The
MDMP model contains seven steps (see Figure 2-2, page 2-3), each of which
incorporate environmental considerations.
2-1
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
Step 1. Receipt of Mission.

Step 2. Mission Analysis.
Step 3. COA Development.
Step 4. COA Analysis.
Step 5. COA Comparison.
Step 6. COA Approval.
Step 7. Orders Production.
Figure 2-2. Steps in the MDMP
RECEIPT OF MISSION
2-3. Receipt of mission focuses on the proactive requirements for

environmental consideration. To be successful, input regarding environmental
considerations must be both early and integrated. It must also be presented in
a format (unit of measure) that is readily useful to the commander and one that
allows him to formulate his initial guidance and his intent rapidly. The
preparation for mission analysis focuses on gathering the necessary tools for
the analysis. These tools include:
• The environmental appendix or annex from the higher headquarters’

order or plan (see Appendix B). The commander can also find
environmental guidance in the coordinating instructions of paragraph
3, the service support annex, or in guidance from the surgeon or other
special staff officers.
• Maps of the area to help the commander assess likely areas for
significant environmental consideration.
• The commander’s or higher headquarters’ SOPs (see Appendix C).
• Appropriate documents and references (such as this field manual),

applicable HN agreements, DOD overseas environmental baseline
guidance document (OEBGD), or similar instructions or guidance.
• Any existing staff estimates as well as applicable lessons learned or

AAR materials. The commander should not be content with simply
seeking out the higher headquarters’ staff estimate.
2-4. All staff officers should develop a generic list of environmental

considerations and associated requirements in their respective area(s) to add to
the general guidelines given in FM 101-5, Appendix A. Staff inputs and
outputs during the MDMP are highlighted in Figure 2-3, page 2-4.
2-2
Input Output
l Mission received from ✧ Cdr’s initial guidance
RECEIPT OF MISSION l Warning order 1
higher HQ or deduced by the
commander/staff
l Higher HQ order/plan/IPB l Initial IPB products
l Staff estimates ✧ Restated mission
l Facts and assumptions Cdr’s intent✧
MISSION ANALYSIS ✧ Cdr’s guidance
l Warning order 2
l Staff products
l Battlefield framework
l Preliminary movement
l Restated mission l COA statements and sketches

l Cdr’s guidance
l Cdr’s intent COA DEVELOPMENT
l Staff estimates and products
l Enemy COAs
l l War game results

Enemy COA
l COA statements and sketches COA ANALYSIS l Task organization
(War game) l Mission to subordinate units
l CCIR
l Staff COA
l Decision matrix
l COA COMPARISON
War game results
l Establish criteria
✧ Approved COA
✧ Refined cdr’s intent
l Decision matrix COA APPROVAL ✧ Specified type of order
✧ Specified type of rehearsal
✧ High pay-off target list
l Approved COA ORDERS PRODUCTION ✧ OPLAN/OPORD
NOTE 1: ✧ Denotes commander’s responsibility.

NOTE 2: Underlying the entire process are continuing
commander and staff estimates.
Figure 2-3. Staff inputs and outputs
MISSION ANALYSIS
2-5. Mission analysis has 17 subordinate steps. While this process results in
the staff formally briefing the commander, there may be items of such
importance to the commander and the formulation of his commander’s
guidance that they need to be brought to the commander immediately rather
than waiting until the formal briefing. If a staff officer has developed good
tools to facilitate mission analysis, he dramatically increase his ability to be
effective.
2-6. The 17 subordinate steps of mission analysis provide the framework for
success in the MDMP. It is essential to perform effective work at this point in
the process. Some steps will prove to be more vital than others in the
application of environmental considerations. The steps in mission analysis are
included in Figure 2-4, page 2-5.
2-3
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
Step 1. Analyze the higher headquarters’ order.

Step 2. Conduct initial IPB.
Step 3. Determine specified, implied, and essential tasks.
Step 4. Review available assets.
Step 5. Determine constraints.
Step 6. Identify critical facts and assumptions.
Step 7. Conduct risk assessment.
Step 8. Determine initial commander’s critical information requirements
(CCIR).
Step 9. Determine the initial reconnaissance annex.
Step 10. Plan use of available time.
Step 11. Write the restated mission.
Step 12. Conduct a mission analysis briefing.
Step 13. Approve the restated mission.
Step 14. Develop the initial commander’s intent.
Step 15. Issue the commander’s guidance.
Step 16. Issue a warning order (W0).
Step 17. Review facts and assumptions.
Figure 2-4. Steps in the mission analysis
Step 1. Analyze the Higher Headquarters’ Order
2-7. The commander and his staff thoroughly analyze the higher
headquarters’ order and identify guidance on environmental consideration.
The level of the CINC is the logical echelon for civil-military interface, and is
the echelon that typically initiates military environmental guidance. If
confused by the higher headquarters’ order or guidance, the staff must
immediately seek clarification. While there is generally a specific annex or
appendix on environmental considerations in the higher headquarters’ order, it
is not the only source of guidance. Coordinating instructions or guidance from
the G4 and others may also contain information critical to environmental
considerations.
Step 2. Conduct Initial IPB
2-8. The IPB is a systematic, continuous process of analyzing the threat and
the effects of the environment on the unit. It identifies facts and assumptions
that determine likely threat COAs. The IPB supports the commander and staff
and is essential to developing estimates and performing decision-making. It is
a dynamic, commander driven, staff process, that continually integrates new
information.
2-9. The IPB is the commander’s and each staff officer’s responsibility; the G2
does not conduct the entire IPB himself. Staff officers must assist the G2 in
developing the situation template (SITTEMP) within their own areas of
expertise. Environmental considerations may make it prudent to focus some of
the IPB support to assist in site selection for units moving into an operational
area. Environmentally sensitive areas are defined in FM 101-5-1 as
environmental areas of interest. Environmental areas of interest include
natural and manmade structures such as waste treatment plants and dams.
2-4
Step 3. Determine Specified, Implied, and Essential Tasks
2-10. The staff analyzes higher headquarters’ orders to determine which

environmental considerations should be specified, implied, and essential tasks.
The mission determines if environmental considerations are essential tasks. If,
for example, the mission is focused on response to a natural or manmade
emergency, it is more likely that environmental considerations will be
important.
Step 4. Review Available Assets
2-11. The commander and staff examine additions to and deletions from the
current task organization, support relationships, and status (current
capabilities and limitations) of all units. They consider the relationship
between specified and implied tasks and available assets. From this
information, they determine whether they have the assets to perform all
specified and implied tasks. If there are shortages, they identify additional
resources needed for mission success. The staff pays particular attention to
deviations from what the commander considers to be his normal task
organization. Subordinate unit current capabilities and limitations to deal with
environmental considerations may be limited. If environmental considerations
require expertise that is not organic to the commander’s unit or his subordinate
units, it is critical that those issues are raised. As an example, a unit may
require specialized assistance (to include corps real estate support teams
[CREST], environmental law expertise, and engineer command [ENCOM]
support) to perform effective EBSs of support locations or areas within the
deployment location itself.
Step 5. Determine Constraints
2-12. A higher commander normally places some constraints on his subordinate

commanders that restrict their freedom of action. Environmental
considerations may also cause constraints on an operation. The commander
and his staff must identify and understand these constraints. These will
normally be found in the scheme of maneuver, concept of operations, and the
coordinating instructions. The commander ensures that critical environmental
constraints are up front in the body of the order and not merely relegated to an
annex or appendix.
Step 6. Identify Critical Facts and Assumptions
2-13. The staff gathers two categories of information concerning assigned

tasks: facts and assumptions. Facts are statements of known data concerning
the situation, including enemy and friendly dispositions, available troops, unit
strengths, and material readiness. Assumptions are suppositions about the
current or future situation that are assumed to be true in the absence of facts.
They take the place of necessary, but unavailable, facts and fill the gaps in
what the commander and staff know about a situation. An assumption is
appropriate if it meets the tests of validity and necessity. Validity means the
assumption is likely to be true. “Assuming away” potential problems, such as
weather, environmental considerations, or likely enemy options, would result
in an invalid assumption. Necessity is whether or not the assumption is
2-5
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
essential for planning. If planning can continue without the assumption, it is

not necessary and should be discarded. When possible, assumptions are
cleared with the higher HQs to ensure they are consistent with the higher
headquarters’ plan. Assumptions are replaced with facts as soon as possible.
2-14. The mission may require significant environmental considerations. In

this case, the facts and assumptions regarding environmental considerations
may assume a preeminent position in the planning process.
Step 7. Conduct Risk Assessment
2-15. The commander and his staff identify accident risk hazards and make an
initial assessment of the risk level for each hazard. The commander also makes
an initial assessment of where he might take tactical risk. (See the risk section
of this chapter and FM 101-5, Annex J.) While the focus of risk assessment is
on tactical risk, significant issues for accident risk, with respect to the
environment, are also considered.
Step 8. Determine Initial Commander’s Critical Information Requirements (CCIR)
2-16. The CCIR identify information that the commander needs to support his
battlespace visualization and to make critical decisions, especially to determine
or validate courses of action. They help the commander filter information by
defining what is important to mission accomplishment. They also focus the
efforts of subordinates in the allocation of resources, and assist staff officers in
making recommendations. Environmental considerations that may be part of
the CCIR include protection of cultural/historical sites, water sources,
HW/polluted industrial sites, or other significant safety considerations. The
commander alone decides critical information based on his experience, the
mission, the higher commander’s intent, and input from the staff.
2-17. The CCIR directly effect the success or failure of the mission and are time
sensitive, driving decisions at decision points.
Step 9. Determine the Initial Reconnaissance Annex
2-18. Based on the IPB and CCIR, the staff, primarily the G2, identifies gaps in
the intelligence and develops an initial reconnaissance and surveillance plan to
acquire information based on available reconnaissance assets. The G3/S3 turns
this reconnaissance plan into an initial reconnaissance annex to launch
reconnaissance assets as soon as possible to begin the collection effort.
2-19. This may include acquiring the support of outside agencies and higher
headquarters. Special requests for environmental information on
environmental considerations critical to the operation are included in the initial
IPB and CCIR. Environmental reconnaissance, as defined in FM 101-5-1,
includes “the systematic observation and recording of site or area data collected
by visual or physical means, dealing specifically with environmental conditions
as they exist, and identifying areas that are environmentally sensitive or of
relative environmental concern, for information and decision-making
purposes.” Reconnaissance of sites that may become base camps, deployment
sites, marshalling areas, logistical sites, or other critical areas with significant
environmental considerations may be included.
2-6
Step 10. Plan Use of Available Time
2-20. The commander and his staff refine their initial plan for the use of
available time. They compare the time needed to accomplish essential tasks to
the higher headquarters’ timeline to ensure mission accomplishment in the
allotted time. Whether or not time is available to conduct an EBS of the area(s)
of deployment or support for an operation is of critical importance during this
step.
Step 11. Write the Restated Mission
2-21. The CofS/XO or G3/S3 prepares a restated mission for the unit based on
the mission analysis. The restated mission includes on-order missions; be-
prepared missions are in the concept of operations. Environmental
considerations may be addressed in the restated mission, especially if the unit
mission is to respond to a forest fire, flood, or some other natural or man-made
disaster.
Step 12. Conduct a Mission Analysis Briefing
2-22. Time permitting, the staff briefs the commander on its mission analysis.
This briefing is often the only time the entire staff is present and the only time
to ensure that all staff members are starting from a common reference point.
The relevant conclusions about environmental considerations, drawn from the
mission analysis, help the commander and staff develop a shared vision of the
requirements for the upcoming operation.
Step 13. Approve the Restated Mission
2-23. Immediately after the mission analysis briefing, the commander approves
a restated mission. This mission can be the staff’s recommended restated
mission, a modified version of the staff’s recommendation, or one that the
commander has developed. Once approved, the restated mission becomes the
unit’s mission. If environmental considerations are crucial to the mission, they
may become a part of the restated mission.
Step 14. Develop the Initial Commander’s Intent
2-24. The commander’s intent is a clear, concise statement of what the force
must do to succeed with respect to the enemy and terrain and to achieve the
desired end state. It provides the link between the mission and the concept of
the operation by stating the key tasks that, along with the mission, are the
basis for subordinates to exercise initiative when unanticipated opportunities
arise or when the original concept of operations no longer applies. If the
commander wishes to explain a broader purpose beyond that of the mission
statement, he may do so. The commander’s intent may contain guidance on
environmental considerations especially when mission success hinges on socio-
economic, political, cultural, or similar goals that effect the end state.
2-7
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
Step 15. Issue the Commander’s Guidance
2-25. After the commander approves the restated mission and states his intent,
he provides the staff with enough additional guidance (preliminary decisions)
to focus staff activities while planning the operation. This guidance is essential
for timely COA development and analysis. By stating his intent and the
planning options he wants them to consider, he can save staff members’ time
and effort by allowing them to concentrate on developing COAs that meet his
intent. His guidance may be written or oral and is perhaps the most likely
location for guidance to be given on environmental considerations, especially
when involved in combat operations. In the case of combat operations, most
environmental considerations will take a relative back seat to other
considerations, as greater environmental risk is likely to be taken.
Step 16. Issue a Warning Order (WO)
2-26. Immediately after the commander provides his guidance, the staff sends
subordinate and supporting units a WO. The staff ensures that risk guidance
includes pertinent environmental considerations.
Step 17. Review Facts and Assumptions
2-27. Ideally, initial mission analysis will identify and quantify most of the
likely environmental considerations. During the rest of the decision-making
process, the commander and staff periodically review available facts and
assumptions. New facts may alter requirements and analysis of the mission.
Assumptions may have become facts or may have become invalid. Whenever
the facts or assumptions change, the commander and staff assess the impact of
these changes on the plan and make the necessary adjustments. The discovery
of additional environmental considerations are likely as the planning
progresses and reconnaissance information is forthcoming.
COA DEVELOPMENT
2-28. After receiving guidance, the staff develops COAs for analysis and
comparison. The commander must involve the entire staff in COA
development. His guidance and intent focus the staff’s creativity to produce a
comprehensive, flexible plan within time constraints. During COA
development, the commander and staff continue the risk management process
(see the risk discussion in this chapter and FM 101-5, Appendix J).
2-29. Environmental considerations will usually be most prominent in meeting

the criteria of suitability and acceptability. The staff develops the COAs to
accomplish the mission and meet the commander’s guidance with respect to
environmental considerations. Provided that the staff has informed the
commander about significant environmental considerations, the commander
will have incorporated these into his initial guidance.
2-8
COA ANALYSIS
2-30. The war game helps the commander and his staff to focus on each stage
of the operation in a logical sequence. Every staff member must determine the
force requirements for external support, risks, and each COA’s strengths and
weaknesses. Determining evaluation criteria (step 5) is probably the most
important step of war gaming for environmental considerations. If
environmental considerations are prominent enough, they are included in the
commander’s guidance and intent, as well as the specified criteria for the level
of residual risk for accident hazards in the COA. Step 5 is where criteria are
assigned for the COA comparison. War gaming the battle and assessing the
results (step 8) is also important in the evaluation of environmental
considerations. It is a requirement for staff officers to conduct risk
management for each COA. Every COA must clearly identify the level of risk
that the commander is willing to accept to include those associated with
environmental considerations.
COA COMPARISON
2-31. Environmental considerations will normally be included in the general

criterion of “residual risk,” or if significant enough, may even be a separate
criterion. Remember that criteria are assigned in step 5 of the war gaming
process. If any environmental consideration was important enough to be in the
commander’s guidance or intent, it will be listed here as well.
COMMANDER’S DECISION BRIEFING
2-32. After completing its analysis and comparison, the staff identifies its
preferred COA and makes a recommendation. If the staff cannot reach a
decision, the CofS (XO) decides which COA to recommend at the commander’s
decision briefing. The staff then briefs the commander. Critical environmental
considerations have become one of the criteria in the decision matrix.
COA APPROVAL
2-33. Again, critical environmental considerations listed in the commander’s

guidance or intent, will be a factor in the commander’s approval of a particular
COA.
ORDERS PRODUCTION
2-34. Environmental concerns are addressed by every staff officer, as

applicable, in respective annexes and appendixes. In the context of an order
following the format in FM 101-5, the specified appendix is Appendix 2 to
Annex F (Engineer). The specified annex to address environmental
considerations for a Joint Operation Planning and Execution System (JOPES)
format is Annex L. The ENCOORD, functioning in this role for the G3 (or
potentially the G4) has the integrating responsibility for this appendix or annex
in the same general fashion that the G2 is responsible for the integration of
IPB. An example appendix is found in Appendix B of this manual.
2-9
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
ENVIRONMENTAL-SPECIFIC PLANNING
2-35. Environmental-specific planning focuses on providing units with the

additional environmental related resources and information necessary to
accomplish their missions. Operational and support planning also includes
environmental protection objectives. In operational situations (discussed in
depth in Chapter 4), whether for training, contingency operations, or combat,
environmental planning focuses on the mission requirements of a military unit.
This planning includes identifying environmental risks posed by an operation
and considering ways to reduce those risks during long-, short-, and near-term
planning. Units require facilities, training areas, and support systems that
must be managed to secure long-term availability. Environmental support
planning is, by nature, long-term. The elements of environmental planning are
included in Figure 2-5. Additional considerations must include medical waste
and unexploded ordnance.
Joint Doctrine for Civil Engineering Support

Joint Publication 4-04
• Policies and responsibilities to protect and preserve the environment
during the deployment.
• Certification of local water sources by appropriate medical field units.
• Solid and liquid management:
- Open dumping.
- Open burning.
- Disposal of gray water.
- Disposal of pesticides.
- Disposal of human waste.
- Disposal of HW.
• HM management, including the potential use of pesticides.
• Flora and fauna protection.
• Archaeological and historical preservation.
• Base field spill plan.
Figure 2-5. Elements of environmental-specific planning
OPERATIONAL PLANNING
2-36. Operational planning usually begins with a formal staff estimate as a

part of the MDMP. However, operational planning may entail a separate study
on the characteristics of the AO or an informal review of the environmental
considerations and issues contained in the higher headquarters’ OPLAN or
OPORD. In either situation, operational planning provides unit leaders with
information they require for unit planning. If your operation will require the
use of base camps, it is critical to begin the planning for them at this point.
2-37. Operational or tactical Army or Marine Corps units may operate in the
theater or as part of a joint task force and be required to interface with the
actions of a temporary board that the joint commander or his designated
commander, joint task force (CJTF) may activate. This is called the joint
environmental management board (JEMB). See Appendix D for more
information on the JEMB.
2-10
STAFF PLANNING
2-38. Staffs conduct environmental planning within the context of the mission.
Their efforts produce information that helps units understand the mission’s
environmental requirements. Most often, staffs develop this information in the
form of staff estimates, environmental protection levels, and an EBS.
Staff Estimates
2-39. Each staff officer incorporates environmental considerations into his staff
estimate (Paragraph 2 – Staff Estimate Format). The staff estimate may
include the following:
• Significant environmental weaknesses and sensitivities in the AO.
• Potential enemy environmental targets.
• Critical or unique resources to the area.
• Environmental conditions related to the situation.
• Applicable laws and regulations.
2-40. Staffs identify environmental weaknesses and critical terrain that may be
a factor to be avoided, actively protected, or exploited temporarily to accomplish
the mission. They identify potential enemy environmental targets and plan
contingency responses. The following environmental factors normally require
consideration during staff estimates:
• Topography and soils.
• Vegetation, including crops.
• Air quality.
• Wildlife and livestock.
• Archaeological and historical sites.
• Safety and public health.
• Land and facility use, occupation, and return.
• Water quality, including surface water, groundwater, storm water, and

wetlands.
• HM and HW disposal and potential cleanup requirements.
• Socioeconomic and political condition sensitivities and desired end

states pertaining to or functions of environmental conditions.
2-11
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
Protection Levels
2-41. The staff develops an OPORD, OPLAN, or CONPLAN. The staff may
publish a full environmental annex/appendix only once. To facilitate changes
in environmental requirements, the command may produce an environmental
protection-level matrix similar to the example in Figure 2-6. This matrix ties
directly into risk assessment, discussed later in this chapter and is applied in
the MDMP during mission analysis (step 7).
Environmental Protection Level

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
1. Waste Management
a. Human Unit SOP Slit trench Burnout latrine Sanitary sewer
waste
b. Solid waste Unit SOP Unit incineration Incineration Landfill
or burial
c. Medical Unit SOP Field collection, US or host nation Same
waste consolidate (HN) approved
disposal disposal methods
d. Hazardous Unit SOP Field collection, Unit collection Resource
waste battalion disposal point, classify, Conservation
label, DLA contract and Recovery
Act (RCRA) or
HN procedures
2. Hazardous Materials
Unit SOP Spill response, HM tracking, spill Spill prevention
report any water response, report plans, response
contamination spills over 50 teams
gallons
3. Natural Resources
a. Water Unit SOP Unit SOP Erosion control No degradation
of water due to
erosion or
effluent
b. Vegetation Unit SOP Restriction on Clearing in excess Clearing requires
camouflage of 100 acres environmental
requires joint task assessment
force (JTF)
approval
c. Air Unit SOP Dust suppression Control open fires, Controls on
nonhazardous fugitive dust incineration and
only traffic
d. Wildlife Unit SOP Unit SOP Note and avoid Taking of

specific habitats species
prohibited
4. Cultural and Historical Resources
Unit SOP Minimize Division-level JTF approval
damage if approval required required for
possible for operations in operations in
area area
Figure 2-6. Notional environmental protection matrix
2-12
2-42. Standard levels of environmental protection facilitate planning,

communications, and flexibility. The notional array of protection levels in
Figure 2-6 ranges from Level 1 to Level 4. Level 1 is less restrictive and more
appropriate for tactical units in combat. Level 4 is very restrictive and more
appropriate for units in garrisons, fixed installations, on major training
exercises, or while performing humanitarian missions in relatively secure and
developed areas. Levels 2 and 3 are merely intermediate steps between the
baseline and optimum levels. Foreign nations or regions in which US forces
operate may have additional environmental protection requirements.
2-43. Staffs may use a matrix to designate protection requirements for specific
missions or areas, to clearly identify and quickly notify units of changes, or to
notify newly arriving units of the rules in the AO.
Environmental Baseline Survey (EBS)
2-44. Many operations require fixed facilities, structures, or other real property
as logistics, command and control, administration, communications, billeting,
base camp, or other mission purposes. If the tactical situation permits,
commanders conduct or direct an initial EBS before occupying the AO. An EBS
is typically performed by or with support from, installations, corps, divisions, or
higher HQs. However, brigades and even task forces may need to perform an
initial EBS without much assistance from higher HQs. This situation would
typically arise as a result of the initial reconnaissance of a proposed site. See
Appendix B for additional EBS guidance and an example. See Chapter 5 for a
discussion of base operations (BASOPS)-related information.
2-45. The initial EBS serves as a tool to assist in determining whether a parcel
of land is acceptable for military use. The initial question should always be
whether the site is healthy for soldiers and Marines. It documents the
proposed site’s existing environmental conditions and the likelihood of past or
ongoing activities that may have created environmental, safety, or health
problems. These problems include contamination of air, soil, groundwater, and
surface water by toxic substances or POL.
2-46. Units conducting an initial EBS concern themselves with locating and
documenting the presence or likely presence of any HM/HW or petroleum
products on the property. An initial EBS will be focused on conditions
indicating existing or past release, or possible release of toxic substances into
structures, or the air, ground, groundwater, or surface water.
2-47. The person conducting the initial EBS will frequently be the unit’s
environmental officer, but the surveyor could be a member of a service’s real
estate team, preventive medicine personnel, a government or contract
environmental engineer, quartering party personnel, or even a unit’s
reconnaissance element. Regardless, environmental knowledge and training
will be key to the surveyor’s success. He conducts and documents the initial
EBS according to the tactical situation, mission, intended use of the facility,
and time and personnel available.
2-13
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
2-48. EBS documentation becomes extremely important at the end of the

mission or upon closure of a facility. See Figure 2-7. At that time, a closure
EBS is done. The initial EBS and the closure EBS bracket the timeframe of use
of the particular site/area.
An EBS should address the following areas:

• Property description and condition. • Adjacent land use.
• Soil type and land cover. • Topographic, hydrologic, and
geologic features.
• Water supply and source.
• Sanitary waste disposal.
• Air quality.
• Solid waste and HW presence.
• Signs of contamination.
• Presence of storage tanks.
• Presence of drums or containers.
• Heating and ventilation.
• Biological and biomedical hazards
(medical wastes). • Electrical-associated hazards.
• Lead-based paint. • Fire-protection systems.
• Unexploded ordnance. • Presence of asbestos-containing
materials.
• Other environmental and health
hazards. • Radiological hazards.
Figure 2-7. Areas addressed in an EBS

2-49. As soon as time and conditions permit, service real estate personnel may
complete a more formal (or updated) EBS and site assessment. However, the
initial assessment, conducted before occupation, is an important document that
conducting units should safeguard. The surveying unit should retain a copy of
the initial EBS and forward the original to higher HQs. The periodic use of
environmental conditions reports (ECR) (see Appendix B) will assist the unit in
both maintaining environmental standards and documenting their stay at a
site/area. The electronic format report is also included in FM 101-5-2 and will
prove helpful in writing the closure EBS.
UNIT PLANNING
2.50. Staffs integrate environmental protection into planning for larger units.
Unit leaders integrate environmental protection into unit planning for
battalion- and company-level units. Unit planning includes:
• SOPs.
• OPORDs.
• Risk management plan (discussed later in this chapter).
• Training plans (see Chapter 3).
2-14
Standing Operating Procedures
2-51. Unit leaders develop SOPs reflecting environmental protection

considerations for routine tasks and activities. SOPs provide information to
soldiers and Marines on how to accomplish routine tasks in an environmentally
sound manner. SOPs incorporate local requirements. As local requirements
change, unit leaders update their SOPs. SOPs also help define environmental
protection requirements for all unit activities—facility operations, field
operations, deployment, and combat. (See Appendix C for an example of a unit
SOP.) Unit leaders ensure that SOPs comply with local requirements by
coordinating with the higher headquarters’ staff—usually the environmental
office, the surgeon and his staff, preventive medicine personnel, and the SJA or
ENCOORD.
2-52. Unit leaders conduct environmental risk assessments (see discussion

later in this chapter and Appendixes F and G) when planning operations or
activities. Risk assessment is a standard element of the MDMP. Unit leaders
perform environmental risk assessments for activities not addressed in the
SOP or when conditions differ significantly from those described in the SOP. A
maintenance unit does not perform a risk assessment every time it performs a
lubrication or service. Rather, the SOP describes the correct manner to
perform these actions. Risk assessments apply to garrison operations as well
as field operations.
Orders/Plans
2-53. Unit leaders address environmental protection in their plans and orders
including: WOs, OPORDs, OPLANs, CONPLANs, and fragmentary orders
(FRAGOs). The higher headquarters’ staff develops an environmental
appendix/annex, to its OPORD/OPLAN/CONPLAN. Subordinate unit leaders
draw environmental information from the environmental appendix (Appendix
B of this manual) to the OPORD/OPLAN/CONPLAN, or from Annex L in a
JOPES document. FM 101-5 directs the inclusion of Appendix 2
(Environmental Considerations) to Annex F (Engineer) of the OPLAN/OPORD/
CONPLAN and specifies that lower-level unit leaders/staffs include
environmental information in the coordinating instructions and service and
support paragraphs.
THE RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS
2-54. FM 101-5 describes risk management as the process of detecting,

assessing, and controlling risk arising from operational factors and balancing
risk with mission benefits. Risk management is an integral part of the MDMP.
FM 100-14 outlines the risk management process and provides the framework
for making risk management a routine part of planning, preparing, and
executing operational missions and everyday tasks. Assessing environmental-
related risks is part of the total risk management process.
2-55. Knowledge of environmental factors is key to planning and decision-

making. With this knowledge, leaders quantify risks, detect problem areas,
reduce risk of injury or death, reduce property damage, and ensure compliance
2-15
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
with environmental laws and regulations. Unit leaders should conduct risk
assessments before conducting any training, operations, or logistical activities.
TACTICAL RISK AND ACCIDENT RISK
2-56. When assessing the risk of hazards in operations, the commander and
staff must look at two types of risk:
• Tactical risk is risk concerned with hazards that exist because of the
presence of either the enemy or an adversary, thus involving the
considerations of force protection. It applies to all levels of war and
across the spectrum of operations. For example, during the Gulf War,
the enemy’s demolition of oil fields created a significant health and
environmental hazard to the surrounding countryside and to those
units maneuvering through the area. (See Chapter 7.)
• Accident risk includes all operational risk considerations other than

tactical risk. It includes risk to friendly forces and risk posed to
civilians by an operation, as well as the impact of operations on the
environment. It can include activities associated with hazards
concerning friendly personnel, civilians, equipment readiness, and
environmental conditions. Examples of environmental-related
accident risk are improper disposal of HW, personnel that are not
properly trained to clean up a spill, and units maneuvering in
ecologically sensitive terrain. Preventive medicine considerations also
fall into this area of risk.
2-57. Tactical risk and accident risk may be diametrically opposed. The
commander may choose to accept a high level of environmental-related accident
risk to reduce the overall tactical risk. For example, a commander may decide
to destroy an enemy’s petroleum storage area to reduce his overall tactical risk.
LEGAL AND REGULATORY RESPONSIBILITIES
2-58. Risk management does not convey authority to deliberately disobey local,
state, national, or HN laws and regulations. It neither justifies ignoring
regulatory restrictions and applicable standards nor bypassing risk controls
required by law. Examples of risk controls include the provisions applicable to
the transportation of HM and HW, life safety and fire protection codes, or the
storage of classified material and physical security.
2-59. As described in AR 200-2 and MCO P5090.2A, the National

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires federal agencies, including the
military, to consider the environmental consequences of their proposed actions
before making decisions. The level of environmental consideration exercised
depends on the scope of the action, the extent of public interest, and the
potential for environmental impacts. NEPA requirements are discussed in
Chapter 5 and Appendix A. Leaders should consult installation and
operational staff on NEPA-related issues. NEPA concerns are generally
installation or operational level unit considerations. For most unit-level
(tactical) environmental decisions, leaders will conduct a risk assessment and
identify environmental-related hazards as part of the process.
2-16
ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS OF RISK MANAGEMENT
2-60. Risk management assists commanders in complying with environmental

regulatory and legal requirements, and operating within the higher
commander’s intent. Risk management provides leaders a tool to do the
following:
• Identify applicable environmental standards, laws, and rules of

engagement (ROE) that effect the mission.
• Identify alternate COAs or alternate standards that meet the intent of

the law and the operational requirements.
• Identify feasible and effective control measures where specific

standards do not exist.
• Ensure better use of limited resources, such as training areas and

ranges.
• Ensure the health and welfare of soldiers/Marines and other effected

personnel. (See Chapter 7).
• Minimize or eliminate damage to natural and cultural resources.
RISK MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES
2-61. To guide environmental risk decision-making, commanders use the three

risk management principles, described in FM 100-14:
• Integrate risk management into mission planning, preparation, and

execution.
• Make risk decisions at the appropriate level in the chain of command.
• Accept no unnecessary risk.
THE FIVE STEP PROCESS
2-62. FM 100-14 describes the five risk management steps. Leaders may use
the document worksheets found in Appendix F to assist them in tracking these
steps. Figure 2-8, page 2-18, shows the relationship of environmental hazards
to the total risk management process.
2-63. The following steps identify specific environmental considerations that

the commander and his staff must consider:
• Step 1. Identify (environmental) hazards.
• Step 2. Assess (environmental) hazards to determine risk.
• Step 3. Develop controls and make risk decisions.
2-17
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
• Step 4. Implement controls.
• Step 5. Supervise and evaluate.
1 Identify
hazard
METT-T Environmental
hazard hazards
Tactical and accident risks
Assess Implement
2 hazard 4 control
Develop Supervise
controls and
3 make 5 and
evaluate
decisions
Figure 2-8. Environmental hazard relationship to the risk management process
Identify (Environmental) Hazards
2-64. Commanders and staffs identify environmental hazards during mission

analysis. FM 100-14 defines hazards as any actual or potential condition that
can cause injury, or illness to, or the death of personnel; damage to or loss of
equipment or property; or mission degradation. Environmental hazards
include all activities that may pollute, create negative noise-related effects,
degrade archaeological/cultural resources, or negatively affect threatened or
endangered species’ habitats. They also include environmental health-related
hazards as further defined in Chapter 7. Figure 2-9, page 2-19 provides
common environmental hazards identified by environmental media areas.
Assess (Environmental) Hazards to Determine Risk
2-65. Risk assessment is a three-stage process to determine the risk of

potential harm to the environment:
• Stage 1. Assess the probability of each hazard.
2-18
• Stage 2. Assess the severity of each hazard.
• Stage 3. Determine the risk level of each hazard.
2-66. Assessments include two factors: probability and severity. Probability is

how often a hazard (environmental) is likely to occur. Severity is the effect a
hazard will have expressed in terms of the degree of injury or illness, loss of or
damage to equipment or property, environmental damage, and other mission-
impairing factors, such as loss of combat power.
2-67. Probability and severity are estimates that require individual judgment
and a working knowledge of the risk management process and its terminology.
Figure 2-10, page 2-21, defines the four degrees of severity, and Figure 2-11,
pages 2-21 to 2-22, the five degrees of probability for a hazard. Refer to
Chapter 2 of FM 100-14 for a more in-depth discussion of these substeps as
they relate to assessing environmental hazards to determine risk.
2-68. Leaders must assess the probability and the potential severity of
environmental damage. Commanders use common sense, past evaluations,
higher commander guidance, historical data, lessons learned, and any other
useful sources to determine the probability of an event occurring. Severity,
however, attempts to quantify the amount of potential damage created by an
event. For example, the probability of a fuel spill occurring during an exercise
might be remote. However, if the spill occurs in a body of water where the fuel
will spread quickly, the potential severity could be catastrophic. In this
example, the unit commander may choose to limit the potential severity by
locating the fuels away from the body of water. While leaders must assess the
probability of environmental damage, they must also determine how much
damage the event would cause, regardless of the probability.
Media Area Common Environmental Hazards

Air Equipment exhaust
Convoy dust
Range fires
Open air burning
Pyrotechnics/smoke pots/smoke grenades
Part-washer emissions
Paint emissions (to include CARC considerations)
Air conditioner/refrigeration chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs)
HM/HW release
Pesticides
Other toxic industrial chemicals/material
Archaeolog- Maneuvering in sensitive areas
ical/cultural Digging in sensitive areas
Disturbing or removing artifacts
Demolition/munitions effects
HM/HW spills
Sonic booms/prop wash
Figure 2-9. Common environmental hazards
2-19
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
Noise Low flying aircraft (helicopters)

Night operations
Operations near post/camp boundaries and civilian populace
Vehicle convoys/maneuvers
Large scale exercises
Threatened/ Maneuvering in sensitive areas
endangered Demolition/munitions effects, especially during breeding seasons
species Disturbing habitat or individual species
HM/HW spills or releases
Poor field sanitation
Improper cutting of vegetation
Damage to coral reefs
Soil (terrain) Over-use of maneuver areas
Munitions and munitions related wastes
Range fires
Poor maneuver-damage control
Erosion
Troop construction effects
Refueling operations
HM/HW spills
Maneuver in ecologically sensitive areas such as wetlands and tundra
Industrial waste runoff
Pesticide accumulation in soil, vegetation, and terrestrial organisms
Water Refueling operations near water sources
HM/HW spills
Erosion and unchecked drainage
Amphibious/water crossing operations
Troop construction effects
Washing vehicles at unapproved sites
Figure 2-9. Common environmental hazards (continued)
2-69. It is usually easier to determine probability than severity. Definitions for

the degrees of severity are not absolutes; they are more conditional and related
to mission, enemy, terrain, troops, time available, and civilian considerations
(METT-TC). Leaders must use their experience, judgment, lessons learned, and
subject matter experts to assist them in determining degrees of severity. The
following examples of severity for archaeological, historical, or cultural sites
provide leaders a frame of reference for what may be included when estimating
degrees of severity.
• Catastrophic - irreparable damage, total loss of the site, complete

destruction, irreplaceable, and anticipate widespread public concern.
Will require notification of higher HQs, public affairs, and outside
agencies.
• Critical - major physical damage to historical/cultural structure.

Restoration is difficult, long-term, costly, and will require assistance
and notification of higher HQs, public affairs, and outside agencies.
2-20
• Marginal - minor physical damage to historical/cultural structures

which can be restored with outside assistance. Unit must report
damage to higher HQs.
• Negligible - surrounding site damage from individual and vehicular

activities easily repaired or restored by the unit; no physical damage to
structures; unit must report damage to higher HQs.
Severity Rating Definition
Catastrophic (I) Loss of ability to accomplish the mission or near

mission failure, death or permanent total disability
(accident risk), loss of major or mission-critical system
or equipment, major property (facility) damage, severe
(strategic) environmental damage, mission-critical
security failure, unacceptable collateral damage
Critical (II) Significantly (severely) degraded mission capability or

unit readiness, permanent partial disability, temporary
total disability exceeding 3 months time (accident risk),
extensive (major) damage to equipment or systems,
significant damage to property or the environment,
security failure, significant collateral damage
Marginal (III) Degraded mission capability or unit readiness, minor

damage to equipment or systems, property, or the
environment; lost days due to injury or illness not
exceeding 3 months (accident risk); minor damage to
property or the environment
Negligible (IV) Little or no adverse impact on mission capability, first

aid or minor medical treatment (accident risk), slight
equipment or system damage but fully functional and
serviceable, little or no property or environmental
damage
Figure 2-10. Hazard severity
Frequent (A) occurs very often, continuously experienced

Single item Occurs very often in service life, expected to occur
several times over duration of a specific mission or
operation, always occurs
Fleet or inventory of items Occurs continuously during a specific mission or
operation or over a service life
Individual soldier Occurs very often in career, expected to occur several
times during mission or operation, always occurs
All soldiers exposed Occurs continuously during a specific mission or
operation
Likely (B) occurs several times
Single item Occurs several times in service life, expected to occur
during a specific mission or operation
Fleet or inventory of items Occurs at a high rate, but experienced intermittently
(regular intervals, generally often)
Individual soldier Occurs several times in career, expected to occur
during a specific mission or operation
All soldiers exposed Occurs at a high rate, but experienced intermittently
2-21
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
Figure 2-11. Hazard probability
2-22
Occasional (C) occurs sporadically

Single item Occurs some time in service life, may occur about as
often not during a specific mission or operation
Fleet or inventory of items Occurs several times in service life
Individual soldier Occurs some time in career, may occur during a
specific mission or operation, but not often
All soldiers exposed Occurs sporadically (irregularly, sparsely, or
sometimes)
Seldom (D) remotely possible; could occur at sometime
Single item Occurs in service life but only remotely possible, not
expected to occur during a specific mission or
operation
Fleet or inventory of items Occurs as isolated incidents, possible to occur some
time in service life but rarely, usually does not occur
Individual soldier Occurs as isolated incident during a career, remotely
possible, but not expected to occur during a specific
mission or operation
All soldiers exposed Occurs rarely within exposed population as isolated
incidents
Unlikely (E) can assume will not occur, but not impossible
Single item Occurrence not impossible, but may assume will
almost never occur in service life, may assume will not
occur during a specific mission or operation
Fleet or inventory of items Occurs very rarely (almost never or improbable),
incidents may occur over service life
Individual soldier Occurrence not impossible, but may assume will not
occur in career or during a specific mission or
operation
All soldiers exposed Occurs very rarely, but not impossible
Figure 2-11. Hazard probability (continued)
2-70. Using the defined degrees of probability and severity, an individual can
determine the overall environmental-related risk level from the intersection of
the two in the risk assessment matrix shown in Figure 2-12.
Risk Assessment Matrix
Probability
SEVERITY Frequent Likely Occasional Seldom Unlikely

(A) (B) (C) (D) (E)
Catastrophic (I) E E H H M
Critical (II) E H H M L
Marginal (III) H M M L L
Negligible (IV) M L L L L
Figure 2-12. Risk assessment matrix
2-23
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
Risk Category
Extremely High (E)

Mission failure if hazardous incidents occur during mission. A frequent or likely
probability of catastrophic loss (IA or IB) or frequent probability of critical loss (IIA)
occurs.
High (H)
Significantly degraded mission capabilities in terms of required mission standard or not
accomplishing all parts of the mission, not completing the mission to standard (if hazards
occur during mission). Occasional to seldom probability of catastrophic loss (IC or ID). A
likely to occasional probability of a critical loss occurring (IIB or IIC) with material and
soldier system. Frequent probability of marginal (IIIA) losses.
Moderate (M)
Expected degraded mission capabilities in terms of required mission standard. Will have
reduced mission capability (if hazards occur during mission). Unlikely probability of
catastrophic loss (IE). The probability of a critical loss occurring is seldom (IID).
Marginal losses occur with a probability of no more often than likely (IIIB or IIIC).
Frequent probability of negligible (IVA) losses.
Low (L)
Expected losses have little or no impact on accomplishing the mission. The probability of
critical loss is unlikely (IIE), while that of marginal loss is no more often than seldom (IIIB
through IIIE).
Figure 2-12. Risk assessment matrix (continued)
2-71. A practical example of assessing environmental-related risk is provided

in Appendix G.
Develop Controls and Make a Decision
2-72. Develop controls to eliminate or reduce the probability or severity of each

hazard, to lower the overall risk. Controls include of one of the following
categories:
• Educational.
• Physical.
• Avoidance.
2-73. Figure 2-13, page 2-24, provides environmental-related control examples.

The checklist in Appendix E provides additional means for addressing and
reducing environmental risk through the use of effective controls.
2-24
Control
Environmental-Related Examples
Type
Educational • Conducting unit environmental awareness training
• Conducting an environmental briefing before deployment
• Performing tasks to environmental standards
• Reviewing environmental considerations in AARs
• Reading unit’s environmental SOPs and policies
• Conducting spill prevention training
• Publishing an environmental annex/appendix to the
OPORD/OPLAN
Physical • Providing spill prevention equipment
• Establishing field trash collection point and procedures
• Establishing field satellite accumulation site and procedures
• Policing field locations
• Practicing good field sanitation
• Filling in fighting positions
• Posting signs and warnings for off-limit areas
Avoidance • Maneuvering around historical/cultural sites
• Establishing refueling and maintenance areas away from wetlands
and drainage areas
• Crossing streams at approved sites
• Preventing pollution
• Limiting noise in endangered and threatened species habitats
• Avoiding refueling over water sources
• Curtailing live vegetation use for camouflage
Figure 2-13. Environmental-related controls
2-74. Many environmental risk controls are simply extensions of good

management, housekeeping, operations security (OPSEC), and leadership
practices. Risk reduction controls include conducting rehearsals, changing
locations, establishing procedures, and increasing supervision.
2-75. Once all feasible risk control measures are in place, some risk will always
remain. This residual risk requires leaders’ attention. Unit leaders inform
their chain of command of the residual risk and its implications on the
operation. Unit leaders also inform their subordinates and focus C2 efforts on
those portions of the operation. The commander alone decides whether or not
to accept the level of risk. He may also direct his staff to consider additional
controls or a change in the COA based on environmental risk.
Implement Controls
2-76. Inform subordinates, down to individual soldiers/Marines, of risk control

measures. State how each control will be implemented, and assign
responsibility. For example, if the control measures for a fuel spill hazard are
to ensure that operators are properly trained to dispense fuel and appropriate
spill equipment is available, then leaders must ensure that these controls are in
2-25
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
place before the operation begins. This preparation requires leaders to

anticipate environmental requirements and incorporate them into long-, short-,
and near-term planning as described in Chapter 3. The key to success is
identifying the “who, what, where, when, and how” aspects of each control.
Supervise and Evaluate
2-77. Leaders and staffs continuously monitor controls throughout the

operation to ensure their effectiveness and to modify controls as required. They
also make on-the-spot corrections, evaluate individual and collective
performance, hold those in charge accountable, and require that all tasks be
performed to applicable environmental standards. Leaders ensure that the
AAR process includes an evaluation of environmental-related hazards, controls,
soldier/Marine performance, and leader supervision. Finally they ensure the
development of environmental lessons learned for use in future operations.
SUMMARY
2-78. It is essential to include environmental considerations early and

throughout the planning cycle. The integration of environmental
considerations is an easy fit and causes no functional change in the MDMP
process. Like safety, it is another consideration to apply during these
processes. Many leaders and soldiers/Marines have already been performing
in a manner that takes environmental considerations into account. Leaders
may build on this existing environmental awareness as they responsibly
integrate environmental considerations into all military planning, training, and
operations. Chapter 6 and Appendix E describe how to both establish and
assess an environmental program.
2-79. Unit leaders use risk assessment to estimate the impact of their unit
activities on the natural environment and to identify environmentally-related
safety issues for their soldiers or Marines. Environmental-related risk is part
of the risk management process as detailed in FM 100-14. Knowledge of
environmental factors is key to planning and decision-making. Risk
management does not convey authority to deliberately disobey local, state,
national, HN laws and regulations, or the environmental laws of war (ELOW).
Risk management assists commanders in complying with environmental
regulatory and legal requirements, and operating within the higher
commanders’ intent. Unit leaders should complete risk assessments before
conducting training, operations, or logistical activities. Risk assessments assist
leaders and their staffs in identifying potential environmental hazards, develop
controls, make risk decisions, implement those controls, and ensure proper
supervision and evaluation. Unit staffs consolidate environmental risks, as
well as all other risk, into the overall unit risk management plan for an
operation.
2-26
Chapter 3
Training: Integrating Environmental Considerations

“Environmental protection must be treated as you would any other
mission. Make environmental considerations integral to all operations
and decisions. Commit sound stewardship of Army lands and protect the
environment.”
General William Hartzog
The integration of environmental considerations into training is very

similar to the integration of safety and force protection issues. Training
is the key to accomplishing the mission. Environmental considerations
should meld into the planning and implementation of the training
process. The discussion of battle-focused training highlights the
integration of environmental considerations throughout the training
cycle, as specified in FM 25-101. While this process is Army-specific, it is
similar to the process employed by the Marine Corps.
In addition to general environmental awareness training, specialized

training is required based on certain duties and responsibilities. Some of
this specialized environmental training and much of the awareness
training can be addressed through integrated instruction or supplemental
material as part of the ongoing unit training programs.
BATTLE-FOCUSED TRAINING
3-1. Battle-focused training is addressed in FM 25-101. Training is the

cornerstone of readiness and the basis for credible deterrence and capable
defense. It is essential to “train as you fight”, but in the case of environmental
considerations, it is also true that the closer the military is to fighting, the less
preeminent environmental considerations are likely to be. This shift in
emphasis does not imply that environmental considerations go away! In fact,
they are applicable in every situation—it’s their level of immediate importance
that varies. Despite the fact that the military trains for combat, most of the
missions performed as a unit will not occur during combat. Units must plan for
environmental considerations prior to conducting training. A good leader will
not take his soldiers or Marines into a training situation without providing
them the essential preparation for success. Soldier/Marine welfare is based on
the training and application of sound environmental considerations, so it is well
worth the effort and attention. Just as failure to apply considerations of supply
accountability or other legal matters, failure to pay attention to environmental
considerations can hinder mission success and increase personal liability.
3-0
3-2. This section focuses on how environmental considerations fit into the
planning cycle as discussed in FM 25-101. The discussion of a particular
environmental program assessment is covered in Chapter 6. The planning
cycle helps identify where specific actions take place. Figure 3-1 below
highlights the parallel environmental protection actions that unit leaders must
integrate into the planning, execution, and evaluation portions of a unit
training cycle.
• Recon site (as appriopriate)

Mission • Assess environmental risk
• Ensure environmental • Coordinate with
accountability environmental staffs
• Ensure HM/HW accountability • Review plans and SOPs
• Include environmental issues in • Obtain clearance and land use
AARs permits
• Develop environmental lessons ASSESS
• Conduct environmental skills
SITUATION
learned training
Conduct Unit • Request special equipment
Assessment Prepare Long-
Range Plan
Evaluate Feedback
Prepare Short-
Range Plan • Brief commander and staff
• Recon site
• Coordinate with EMO
Execution • Plan for HM/HW storage and
Prepare Near- transport
Term Plan • Review spill prevention
measures
• Supervise high-risk operations • Modify plans as necessary
• Conduct periodic environmental
assessments
• Correct problems on the spot
• Avoid off-limits areas • Brief unit personnel
• Report damage • Conduct rehearsals
• Prevent spills • Check equipment
• Remove HM/HW • Modify plans as necessary
Figure 3-1. Integrating environmental considerations into unit planning/training
ASSESSMENT
3-3. The planning process begins with assessment. In-depth assessment

determines a strategy to improve training proficiency on specific weaknesses
and plan sustainment training on demonstrated strengths. Assessment links
the evaluation of completed training to the planning of upcoming training.
Commanders must assess the unit’s internal and overall status of
environmental training program and unit proficiency. Before effective
planning can occur, it is essential to perform an assessment of the current
status of a unit.
LONG-RANGE PLANNING
3-4. At the battalion level, long-range planning starts with unit assessment
and is the basis for the long-range calendar. Resources, such as major training
3-1
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
areas, ammunition, and fuel, are allocated, and shortfalls are identified. The
long-range plan synchronizes supporting units and agencies so that effective
training events can be properly executed. This generally translates into annual
training guidance.
3-5. Leaders use risk management, review SOPs, and ensure that personnel
receive the correct tools to avoid/prevent/mitigate environmental damage.
They address environmental considerations and develop methods to overcome
them so that effective training can be accomplished. Items that have an
environmental focus during this phase include the following:
• Conducting reconnaissance of the training site (as appropriate).
• Assessing the environmental risk.
• Coordinating with installation environmental staffs.
• Reviewing plans and SOPs.
• Obtaining clearance and land use permits.
• Conducting environmental skills training.
• Requesting special equipment or support.
• Coordinating with preventive medicine personnel.
SHORT-RANGE PLANNING
3-6. Short-range planning refines the long-range calendar. It defines in

greater detail the broad guidance on training events and other activities in
long-range planning calendar and command training guidance. This generally
translates into quarterly training guidance.
3-7. During short-range planning leaders review existing procedures, issue

specific environmental guidance, update risk assessment matrices and unit
SOPs, and train their soldiers/Marines on new environmental protection
procedures. They determine specific methods to incorporate environmental
considerations into the training mission to protect the environment without
lowering standards or readiness. Activities that have an environmental focus
during this phase include:
• Briefing the commander and staff.
• Conducting reconnaissance of the training site.
• Obtaining maps or overlays indicating environmentally sensitive

areas.
• Coordinating with the environmental management office to identify

recent changes in environmental conditions.
3-2
• Planning for HM/HW storage and transport.
• Reviewing spill prevention measures.
• Modifying plans as necessary.
NEAR-TERM PLANNING
3-8. Near-term planning defines specific actions required to execute the short-
range-plan. It is the final phase of planning before the execution of training.
Near-term planning covers a six- to eight-week period before the execution of
training for active component (AC) units and a four-month period before
execution of training for reserve component (RC) units.
3-9. Key leaders inspect equipment and ensure that soldiers/Marines perform
maintenance and preventive maintenance checks and services (PMCS) before
the field exercise. Leaders brief their soldiers/Marines on the environmental
and safety considerations of the exercise. The checklists in Appendix E help
leaders plan and conduct mission activities that minimize adverse impacts on
the environment. During this phase, leaders exercise an environmental focus
through:
• Briefing unit personnel on environmental constraints and issues.
• Conducting rehearsals that include environmental considerations.
• Conducting final reconnaissance of training sites to confirm

environmental conditions prior to the execution of training.
• Checking equipment.
• Ensuring unit SOPs are up-to-date and meet the requirements for the
specific training sites where the training will be performed.
• Checking spill response equipment.
• Modifying plans as necessary.
Preexecution Checks
3-10. Preexecution checks are developed, and responsibility for them is fixed
during the short-range planning phase. These checks become increasingly
detailed during the near-term phase. Preexecution checks provide the
attention to detail needed to use resources efficiently. The three major
environmental considerations are:
• Has a risk assessment (environmental) been completed and safety

considerations incorporated?
• Has reconnaissance of the training ranges, sites, or facilities been

conducted?
3-3
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
• Have leaders been briefed on environmental considerations?
PREPARATION FOR THE EXECUTION OF TRAINING
3-11. Formal planning for training culminates with the publication of the
training schedule. Informal planning and coordination (preexecution checks)
continue until the training is performed. During rehearsals, leaders ensure all
safety and environmental considerations are met.
3-12. To conduct effective, meaningful training for soldiers, leaders, and units,
thorough preparation is essential. Well prepared trainers, soldiers, and
support personnel are ready to participate, and their facilities, equipment, and
materials are ready to use.
EXECUTION
3-13. A unit executes training the same way it executes a combat mission. The
chain of command is present, in charge, and responsible. During operations,
leaders ensure environmental practices and preventive measures are being
employed. Once soldiers/Marines understand what is expected of them, these
practices become merely another measure of unit proficiency and the level of
unit discipline.
Precombat Checks
3-14. Preexecution and precombat checks are key to ensuring that trainers and
soldiers/Marines are adequately prepared to execute training to Army/Marine
Corps standards. Precombat checks are the bridge between preexecution
checks and execution of training. Leaders ensure the execute of precombat
checks by:
• Briefing environmental considerations in the OPORD. Leaders and

soldiers/Marines know what is expected of them.
• Including environmental considerations in the safety checks and

briefings.
• Verifying completion of precombat (before operations) PMCS

completed on vehicles, weapons, communications, and nuclear,
biological, and chemical (NBC) equipment to include environmental
considerations.
• Checking and confirming vehicle load plans, and securing cargo

(especially HM).
Presentation of Training
3-15. Through the presentation of training, leaders provide soldiers/Marines

with the specific training objectives (tasks, conditions, standards), and the
evaluation methods to be used. Environmental constraints may alter the
conditions under which the task is performed, but should never alter the task
standards. Leaders ensure an environmental focus during this phase by:
3-4
• Conducting environmental awareness training.
• Supervising high risk operations.
• Conducting periodic environmental assessments.
• Correcting problems on the spot.
• Avoiding off-limits areas.
• Preventing spills.
• Reporting damage accurately and in a timely manner.
• Removing HM/HW in a timely and appropriate manner.
EVALUATION
3-16. The evaluation process is continuous and integral to training

management. Leaders at every level conduct training evaluation. Discussing
both the environmentally correct and incorrect actions enhances environmental
stewardship in unit personnel and helps soldiers/Marines learn from each
other. The AAR process includes environmental performance and should
address all environmental considerations listed in the training evaluation plan
as well as any others discovered during the course of the training. The
evaluation and AAR should cover the following:
• Ensuring environmental accountability.
• Ensuring HM/HW accountability.
• Including environmental issues in AARs.
• Developing environmental lessons learned.
UNIT ASSESSMENT
3-17. Leaders use evaluations and other feedback measures to assess

soldier/Marine, leader, and unit proficiency. Commanders use the analysis of
the information provided through evaluations for their assessment. Based on
evaluations, commanders adjust priorities and resources as necessary to
synchronize all unit functions. Leaders can also use portions of the self-
assessment guide in Appendix H to assist in their unit assessment.
ENVIRONMENTAL-SPECIFIC TRAINING AND RESOURCES
ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIFIC TRAINING REQUIREMENTS
3-18. All personnel require environmental awareness training. Such training

provides basic information on installation and unit environmental practices.
This training leads to safer performance and establishes an environmental
ethic among soldiers/Marines. Awareness training occurs as early as possible
3-5
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
following assignment to a unit, and ECOs reinforce environmental awareness

training annually.
3-19. In addition to general environmental awareness training, individuals

with certain duties and responsibilities require specialized training. As part of
the unit’s ongoing technical skills training, units provide some specialized
environmental training through integrated instruction or supplemental
material.
3-20. Unit leaders address HM/HW training separately from routine

environmental training requirements. Federal law may require 40 hours of
HW handler training for soldiers and Marines who handle specific HW. Units
schedule this training as soon as possible following the assignment of personnel
to positions dealing with HM. Those who handle HM/HW may also require
eight-hour refresher courses annually. Additionally, federal law, in the RCRA,
mandates HW training for personnel who handle, manage, or transport HW.
The DOD directs that HM training be completed according to Department of
Transportation (DOT) standards/guidance. ECOs should check with the
installation’s environmental office to determine training requirements and
availability.
SUMMARY
3-21. It is essential to include environmental considerations early and

throughout the training cycle. The integration of environmental considerations
is an easy fit that causes no functional change in battle-focused training. Like
safety, it is another important consideration to apply during training planning
and execution. Many of us have already been performing in a manner that
takes some environmental considerations into account. Use that as a
foundation on which to build as we accept the responsibility to integrate
environmental considerations into everything we do. Review Chapter 2 for a
more in-depth discussion of risk management as it applies to environmental
considerations.
3-22. Unit commanders are required to implement environmental-specific

training to include environmental awareness, spill prevention and response,
HM/HW transportation, storage and turn-in procedures/accountability/
management. Commanders must address these requirements in accordance
with their installation environmental management office.
3-23. Read Chapter 6 for a discussion of how to both establish and assess a unit
environmental program. The unit self-assessment in Appendix H provides a
generic checklist for units to assess compliance with environmental laws and
regulations in their daily operations and activities. Unit leaders should
supplement the checklist with applicable state, local, or HN environmental
requirements. Although this checklist serves as a primary tool for unit
environmental self-assessments, the self-assessment is only a guide and does
not provide a final determination of compliance and should be supplemented
based on local requirements. Environmental compliance assessment system
(ECAS) or environmental compliance evaluation (ECE) checklists provide more
comprehensive assessments.
3-6
3-24. The Army and Marine Corps train as they fight. Incorporating the
environmental considerations into training should not change the standard
procedures or considerations that a unit and its leaders apply to an operation.
Chapter 4 shows how including environmental considerations in training
occurs in a nearly seamless fashion.
3-7
Chapter 4
Operations: Integrating Environmental Considerations
“The Army faces a unique set of challenges as it adapts to a world that has
changed more broadly and fundamentally than any time since the end of
WW II. The Army must continue to adapt to ensure success in a rapidly
changing strategic environment. Now more than ever, it serves as a
strategic Army, a land force on which the United States and its allies rely
to meet global challenges.”
FM 100-5, Army Operations
Integrating environmental considerations into operations is the logical

progression after having effectively integrated environmental
considerations in both planning (Chapter 2) and training (Chapter 3). The
commander is, with increasing frequency, constrained by mission
requirements that may restrict the use of much of the combat power
inherent in his organization. Both commanders and staffs must
understand and analyze the implications. These implications can have a
significant effect on operations across the spectrum of conflict. As the
commander prioritizes and analyzes the risks associated with an
operation he may rank some environmental considerations as less
important or more critical than other considerations. Protection of the
environment may very well have to take a backseat to other tactical
considerations as the commander weighs matters of force protection.
However, protecting soldiers and Marines will always be high on the
commander’s list and environmental considerations that impact force
protection and the health and safety of his personnel will cause them to
become one of his highest priorities.
IMPLICATIONS FOR MILITARY FORCES
4-1. Environmental protection has several implications for military operations

that affect all levels of war. When a commander orders an action that will cause
environmental damage, he must determine that the military gain from the action
is justifiable and in some reasonable proportion to the damage to be inflicted.
This “proportionality” judgment for actions, which produce severe environmental
or public health effects, requires some understanding of the impact of the effects.
A commander considering a military action that would have the effect of polluting
the drinking water of a region, for example, must estimate the effect of the
pollution to make a judgment on the proportionality of the action to the damage it
may cause. Additionally, the effects of environmental factors on the strategic end
state or mission success must be identified and assessed. The law of war
4-0
specifically forbids poisoning of water sources. Commanders and their staffs

must understand the strategic, operational, tactical, and ethical implications of
STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS
4-2. The world’s geopolitical framework will continue to undergo dramatic

restructuring, accompanied by a wide array of economic, technical, societal,
religious, cultural, and physical alterations. US military forces must understand
these new environmental and demographic dynamics, which are becoming
increasingly significant in global affairs. Strategic analysis includes
environmental factors as important elements in national security considerations.
4-3. The US National Security Strategy has identified environmental threats as

a primary security interest, and the public has been remarkably consistent
during the last 25 years in its concern for global and local environmental
degradation.
4-4. Commanders and staff officers must understand the role of these new
dynamics as strategic factors that underpin the theater situation and the desired
strategic end state of the operation/conflict. The theater commander may require
that a strategic end state reduce environmental threats or minimize the adverse
environmental impact of the military mission. This concern for the
environmental end state may be particularly true for stability operations or
support operations and is always a consideration as a post-hostilities cost.
4-5. The implications of large-scale environmental warfare became apparent on

January 19, 1991. On this date, the Iraqis opened the valves on Kuwait’s largest
offshore oil terminal, threatening the main water desalinization plant in Saudi
Arabia as well as the ecosystem of the Persian Gulf. This action presented the
theater commander with a requirement for a tactical response. The allied
response to this spill started about ten days later, but the oil continued to
discharge into the Gulf until late May.
4-6. It is critical to articulate the appropriate level(s) of military environmental

protection given the particular nature of any operation. This will not be a
constant. Application of environmental protection in a given contingency will
almost certainly differ from its application in the midst of close combat during a
war. The higher commander’s guidance is essential and is rarely initiated by
commanders at the operational or tactical levels without initial guidance from the
strategic level. Given the linkage between political and military considerations
at the commander in chief (CINC) level, this will likely be the vital echelon for
initiating and defining the driving guidance on military environmental protection
for any given operation.
OPERATIONAL AND TACTICAL IMPLICATIONS
4-7. Environmental protection skills and procedures are required for all military
operations. As environmental factors become more important during the next
century, the military services and the unified commands will develop additional
intelligence and operational capabilities and specific environmental procedures to
match mission categories and constraints. In addition to practicing routine
4-1
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
environmental protection measures, commanders and their staffs face new

environmental challenges and responsibilities including:
• Conducting humanitarian (stability or support) operations after

environmental disasters.
• Integrating force health protection considerations in densely populated

areas that lack operational public health measures.
• Responding to environmental terrorism or sabotage.
• Working within the limitations brought about by environmental

considerations.
• Remedying adverse environmental impacts as a part of the exit strategy.
4-8. The MDMP integrates environmental considerations into mission

accomplishment. Staffs, at the appropriate echelons, must identify and analyze
environmental effects of military actions, as well as characteristics of the
environment influencing friendly or threat operations. Staff consideration of
environmental impact starts with the mission analysis and the initial IPB and
continues through the orders production process.
4-9. During missions, environmental protection should be, to the extent

possible, a matter of standard procedures. Both the Army and the Marine Corps
have established policies on environmental protection. Basic environmental
protection policy is contained in service regulations and special publications.
Joint doctrine for environmental annexes to OPORDs and OPLANs is a part of
the JOPES. Under JOPES, Annex L is the environmental considerations annex
to the OPORD or OPLAN. When not using JOPES, Army forces conform to the
guidance in FM 101-5, which directs that OPLANs/OPORDs will contain an
Appendix 2 (Environmental Considerations) to Annex F (Engineer). Both
formats contain similar information. Appendix B contains an example of what
the FM 101-5 directed environmental considerations appendix will look like. The
information contained in a JOPES document is very similar, although the format
is not exactly the same.
4-10. None of the methods for decision-making in a time-constrained situation,

discussed in FM 101-5, suggest that a commander leave out steps or
considerations. The shortening of the process still requires the performance of all
steps in the process, but in an abbreviated fashion. Commanders must always
make assessments that include environmental considerations and their
associated risks. Anticipation, organization, and prior preparation are the keys
to success in a time-constrained situation.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DURING MILITARY OPERATIONS
4-11. Protecting the environment is always difficult, and protecting the

environment while conducting operations against a hostile force is not always
possible. Military forces must deploy and operate with a minimal environmental
4-2
damage. They must initiate environmental control measures and establish

appropriate protection levels without detracting from mission accomplishment.
4-12. Operations do not typically occur on an installation. As a result, leaders

will need to rely on the guidance in higher headquarters orders to define the
standards for environmental considerations. We have developed initial concepts
base camps that have become the norm for many operations in which US forces
are currently involved. Base camps are not installations, even though they may
employ many of the standards and methods used on installations/bases. They are
in fact, small towns that have the same need to protect their occupants (soldiers
and Marines) from environmental hazards. CALL Newsletter 99-9, Integrating
Military Environmental Considerations, provides insights on the emerging
doctrine for base camp operations.
4-13. Environmental damage is an inescapable consequence of combat

operations, however, the revolution in military technology has made it possible to
minimize the collateral damage from legitimate military operations. It is no
longer necessary to obliterate terrain to achieve the desired military effect.
Wanton employment of military weaponry can produce three primary
environmental effects:
UNNECESSARY IMPACTS
4-14. Unnecessary impacts are environmental damage(s) that military necessity

cannot justify. These impacts are either wanton, intentional acts or negligent,
unintentional acts. Iraqi forces may have committed wanton acts during the
Persian Gulf War when they set Kuwaiti oil fields ablaze and fouled the Persian
Gulf by releasing millions of barrels of crude oil from tanker loading facilities.
These activities may have violated the Hague Convention which requires
belligerents to safeguard real property and forbids its destruction unless
absolutely necessary for military purposes. Some legal commentators have
argued that Iraq had military reasons for these actions (oil fires to provide
smoke/mask retreat and oil release to deter amphibious landings) but that the
advantage gained was not proportional to the environmental damage caused.
COLLATERAL DAMAGE
4-15. Collateral damage results from military actions used to achieve strategic,
operational, or tactical objectives during armed conflict. Concentration of fire or
maneuver can have serious environmental consequences.
4-16. Damaging enemy targets (such as ammunition stockpiles or wastewater

treatment plants) can release hazardous substances that cause unintended
casualties long after the battlefield/area of operations is secured. Practicing
environmental concern or restraint, should not result in decisions that increase
the human cost of victory, the probability of a prolonged conflict, or the
probability of an unfavorable outcome. Commanders must weigh the military
value of the operation against collateral damage. They must continue to assess
the risks and make informed, professional judgments. However, they must now
give heightened consideration to the environmental consequences of their actions.
See Chapter 2.
4-3
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
MODIFICATION OF THE ENVIRONMENT
4-17. This environmental effect includes using environmental modification

(ENMOD) techniques on the atmosphere, oceans, or land masses and associated
water systems to cause widespread, long-lasting, or severe damage to human life,
natural or economic resources, or other assets.
4-18. Environmental modification (ENMOD) may include river diversion,

destruction of oil wells on the sea bed, weather modification, or large-scale
burning or defoliation of vegetation. The 1977 ENMOD Convention was the first
international agreement to explicitly restrict using the natural environment as a
tool of warfare. It prohibits military or hostile use of ENMOD techniques to
damage or injure another country. See Appendix A.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION OPERATIONAL PRINCIPLES
4-19. The notional curve, Figure 4-1, depicts the significance/priority afforded
environmental protection for given missions.
100
80
Percent 60
Capability
40
20
0
Humanitarian Peacekeeping Peace Enforcement Theater Combat
Figure 4-1. Environmental protection considerations relative to mission type
4-20. During combat, commanders will generally weigh concerns such as desired
strategic end state and force protection more heavily than environmental
considerations/concerns. For example, the commander measures the military
value of destroying an enemy’s POL distribution facility, against the potential for
polluting his force’s future water supplies.
4-21. However, even in combat, unit actions should not unnecessarily complicate
the post- conflict outcome by creating unnecessary environmental problems. In
keeping with Clausewitz’s dictum that war is a political instrument, the desired
strategic and operational end state should support a lasting victory. Increasingly,
this end state includes environmental components.
4-22. Commanders must balance environmental protection and mission

requirements. Mission parameters for the operational area, identify and quantify
the time and resources devoted to environmental protection.
4-23. Environmental protection principles do not necessarily override other

operational factors. They are a standard part of the MDMP, in which a
4-4
commander makes decisions based on the facts and recommendations presented

by the staff in the context of mission priorities. These decisions include the three
operational environmental protection principles. The sequence in which they are
discussed does not reflect an order of significance or priority. The operational
environmental protection principles are:
• Avoid unnecessary environmental impact, and limit collateral damage.
• Analyze environmental considerations and impacts in concert with

mission requirements and force protection.
• Incorporate environmental considerations into planning procedures.
AVOID UNNECESSARY ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
4-24. The first principle of environmental protection in a theater of operation is

to avoid unnecessary damage and limit collateral damage. This principle is
essential to meet the provisions of the requirements of Articles 54 and 55 of the
Geneva Convention of 12 August 1949, which protected objects indispensable for
the survival of the civilian population and the natural environment, respectively.
Following this principle helps avoid political, economic, and human suffering,
which complicate the desired operational end state. Adhering to this first
principle requires commanders and staffs to assess regional and local
environmental strengths and vulnerabilities. It also requires that units be
equipped and trained to minimize adverse environmental impacts.
ANALYZE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS AND IMPACTS
4-25. US forces must be capable of decisive victory, employing all means

available within the laws of war to accomplish the mission in full dimensional
operations. The second principle is to analyze environmental
considerations/impacts in concert with mission requirements and force protection.
Protecting natural and cultural resources, as with other constraints, is neither
cost nor risk free, and requires judgment. The considerations NEPA and the
related EO 12114, discussed in Chapter 5, are especially critical. Commanders
make judgments in the context of METT-TC and moral imperatives; the long-
term costs of the potential damage; and the political purposes of the conflict or
mission. To exercise sound judgement, the commander must understand the
application of risk management in the MDMP, as discussed in Chapter 2.
Remember that most environmental considerations directly enhance the health
and safety of soldiers and Marines. (See Chapter 7.)
INCORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION INTO OPERATIONAL PLANNING
4-26. The third principle is to incorporate environmental protection

considerations into operational planning procedures. The notional curve depicted
in Figure 4-2, page 4-7, approximates a deploying unit’s level of environmental
protection management during various phases of an operation. Although all
missions require environmental planning and protection as a part of the MDMP,
different missions require different levels of environmental planning. During
training, environmental considerations typically receive higher priority than
4-5
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
during operations. The integration of environmental considerations into the

planning process is covered in Chapter 2.
100
80
60
Level of
Protection
40
20
0
Training Deployment Post-Operation Training
Mobilization Operational Redeployment
Figure 4-2. Levels of environmental consideration
4-27. During World War II, General Dwight D. Eisenhower struggled with the
issue of balance as it applied to ancient monuments and priceless historical
structures.
“If we have to choose between destroying a famous building and

sacrificing our own men, then our men’s lives count infinitely more, and
buildings must go. But the choice is not always so clear-cut as that. In
many cases, the monuments can be spared without detriment to
operational needs. Nothing can stand against the argument of military
necessity. That is an accepted principle. But the phrase 'military
necessity' is sometimes used where it would be more truthful to speak of
military convenience or even of personal convenience. I do not want it to
cloak slackness or indifference.”
General Dwight D. Eisenhower
SUMMARY
4-28. Integrating environmental considerations into operations is a requirement

that commanders have accepted. As with other considerations, the importance of
environmental considerations should be clearly articulated in the higher
commander’s guidance. Integrating environmental considerations into planning
and training will increase the success of the unit during operations. Restrictions
on the use of combat power for reasons of environmental protection are likely to
be included in many operations.
4-6
4-29. The Army and Marine Corps have procedures that enable units to function
effectively while minimizing environmental damage. These generic procedures
are valid for all operations. The environmental protection principles assist the
commander in weighing the importance of various environmental considerations
and ensuring their soldiers and Marines are protected.
4-7
Chapter 5
Base Support Operations

“The installation/Garrison Commander has enormous responsibilities as
he guides the installation to support the National Strategy and the
movement of our installations to power projection platforms. To execute
this successfully, the commander must understand the core installation
management functions and understand the responsibilities of an
installation commander.”
FM 100-22, Installation Management
This chapter focuses on explaining the environmental program areas and

introducing the BASOPS functions and their role in military
environmental protection. It explains how installations/bases support
units to allow them to meet installation/base specific programs. This
support is critical to units that are assigned to, or will train or mobilize at
an installation. Installation/base and garrison staffs provide services and
support to maneuver units. They are vital to the daily lives of units and in
the preparation to go to war or perform other assigned missions. The
support provided in the area of training is of tremendous importance.
Perhaps the most critical program in this arena from the standpoint of
military environmental protection is the ITAM program. The Army and
Marine Corps must both maintain an effective level of combat readiness
and promote good stewardship of the land on which it trains. Additionally,
installations/bases and BASOPS function as the platforms from which
both units and individuals go through mobilization, deployment,
redeployment and demobilization (MDRD). In exchange for the critical
support that installations/BASOPS provide, units must reciprocate by
exercising responsibility in their interface with the installation/base. This
chapter identifies the partnership and provides insights on how to make it
work for the commander and his unit. A great deal of help is available
from environmental personnel at the installation level, and it is here that
a person may find or gain access to many of the technical experts on
environmental matters. For insights into additional help available to the
commander see Appendix D.
5-0
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM AREAS
5-1. Environmental program areas provide the framework for all of the
programs that are in place on an installation to support military
FOCAL POINTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
5-2. The four broad areas to which environmental protection strategies

apply are: hazardous substance control, natural habitat and wildlife
protection, resource conservation, and cultural resource protection.
Hazardous Substance Control
5-3. The laws and policies that control hazardous substances protect water,
soil, and air from harmful levels of contamination. The military uses large
quantities of hazardous substances, such as fuels, paints, batteries, and
solvents. Often these compounds contain pesticides, acids, metals, and other
toxins. The military work environment, whether training or combat, is more
conducive to HM/HW spills than the normal workplace. Given these
conditions, US military forces must take extra precautions to ensure they
minimize environmental contamination by hazardous substances.
Natural Habitat and Wildlife Protection
5-4. The last 50 years of population and industrial growth have caused a
significant loss of natural habitat—forests, croplands, waterways, fisheries—
and a growing list of endangered and threatened species. Consequently, most
nations have laws protecting natural habitat and wildlife and have signed
international wildlife protection treaties. US laws and parallel international
treaties recognize that the loss of a single species can indicate damage to an
entire ecosystem’s health.
5-5. Many of these threatened or endangered species reside on installations

and training areas operated by the Army and the Marine Corps. Installation
commanders, their staffs, and tenant units assume responsibility for
safeguarding these species while performing their vital training missions.
Theater commanders must consider these species and their habitat when
they select bivouac areas, base camps, transportation corridors, harbors,
logistics support areas, and airfields.
Resource Conservation
5-6. Some resources, such as metal ores and petroleum products, are limited
in availability and are nonrenewable. However, many nonrenewable
resources can often be conserved or reused. Conserving these resources
reduces waste generation and associated disposal problems. Otherwise, these
wastes require incineration, treatment, or burial.
5-7. These options are costly and may contribute to pollution. Pollution
prevention efforts are focused on reducing the initial generation of such
wastes to avoid the need for treatment and disposal whenever possible.
5-1
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
Resource conservation efforts, such as energy efficiency and recycling, reduce

operating costs and the burden of waste disposal.
Cultural Resource Protection
5-8. Resources such as buildings, religious structures, monuments, and

archaeological sites represent a clear link to the past. Since they are
nonrenewable, US military forces respect and preserve them whenever
possible.
5-9. Many Army and Marine Corps facilities include historic monuments,
buildings, battlefields, archaeological sites, and cemeteries. Likewise, many
operational theaters contain similar resources, some of which have cultural or
religious significance. US military forces respect these resources by avoiding
cultural and religious centers whenever possible. However, when all other
options have been exhausted, US forces will act decisively when the enemy
uses cultural resources to gain a tactical/operational/strategic advantage. The
attacks on Monte Casino during World War II and at Hue in Vietnam are
examples of such uses of cultural resources.
5-10. On military installations, several environmental protection programs

support cultural preservation. Each program has a specific objective
intended to meet legal and strategic environmental requirements. The
requirements of these programs are simply extensions of good management
and leadership practices.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM AREAS
5-11. Military programs that protect the environment correspond to legal

requirements to protect air, land, water, human health, and natural and
cultural resources. Figure 5-1, page 5-3, summarizes program goals.
5-12. In general, at battalion level or below, these program requirements are

integrated into existing unit programs and procedures. They need not be
addressed as separate environmental programs. However, commanders
should coordinate with appropriate installation environmental staff to
determine whether unit-specific circumstances such as mission, active or
reserve status, or location dictate other requirements. Certain units, such as
explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) units, higher level maintenance activities,
or maritime units, may have additional environmental requirements. These
units should coordinate closely with their supporting installations and
proponent school.
5-2
Environmental Programs
Program Area Goal Military Impact
Air Control emissions POL storage, energy production, waste
disposal, smoke operations, fugitive
dust
Asbestos Minimize release of and Building acquisition, site demolition,
management exposure to asbestos vehicle repair parts
Cultural Protect historic and Training area restrictions, additional
resource cultural heritage costs for building renovations
management
Environmental Protect health and reduce Timing and location of training events,
noise community annoyance flight paths, firing points
management
HM Prevent pollution, comply Procurement, installation storage and
management with HM regulations inventory management, turn-in
programs for HM
HW and solid Minimize generation of Training in segregation, recycling, and
waste wastes substitution to minimize HM and
management medical waste
Natural Protect natural INRMP, ITAM, training area protection
resource environment and maintenance
management
Pollution Reduce pollution and Turn-in procedures for reusable items,
prevention waste generation energy efficiency programs, recycling
Spill prevention Prevent and respond to Installation and unit spill plans
and response spills
Water Conserve and protect Erosion control, storm water control,
resources water vehicle drip pans, wash racks
management
Figure 5-1. Typical environmental program areas and their goals/impact
INSTALLATION AND FACILITY RESPONSIBILITIES
5-13. Installations and other facilities provide industrial, acquisition, and

training area support to their assigned units. Installation facilities and
services support mission requirements for training, mobilization, and
deployment. Efficient operations in these areas minimize the environmental
impact of pollution and resource consumption. The primary resources
available to assist a unit with environmental problems and issues are the
chain of command and installation specialists (in the EMO). The chain of
command communicates environmental directives. The environmental
responsibilities of the installation/base staff is addressed in this chapter. By
understanding organizational relationships, unit leaders can work as a team
with those that support them and operate more efficiently and effectively.
Refer to FM 100-22 for a focused discussion of Army installation
management.
5-3
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
GARRISON/INSTALLATION ORGANIZATIONS AND STAFF
5-14. On a divisional installation/base, the division commander is also

typically the installation/base commander. As such, he will have a Garrison
Commander to perform the installation portion of his responsibilities. The
Garrison Commander’s role in environmental stewardship centers on
monitoring, coordinating, and ensuring that all staff and support personnel
meet the compliance guidance set forth by federal, state, and local agencies.
Additionally, he orchestrates environmental support to the units assigned to
or training on his installation/base. In some locations, such as Europe area
support group (ASG)/base support battalion (BSB) commanders tie together
the garrison/installation responsibilities for multiple sites.
5-15. The Army's environmental program identifies the offices available to

assist commanders and their chain of command in solving environmental
problems and making soldiers aware of environmental requirements. A basic
review of key installation POCs will help determine who can provide
assistance. Figure 5-2, shows a typical installation staff/offices that have
environmental responsibilities. The Marine Corps has a similar organization
shown in Figure 5-3, page 5-5. For more information see the latest version of
MCO 5090.2. Due to mission, magnitude of installation/base, environmental
responsibilities, and manning, not all installations/bases are organized as
depicted.
Commanding General
Deputy Commanding General
Garrison Commander
Directorate of Plans,
Directorate of Health Directorate of Public Provost Marshal Office
Training, and
Services Works
Mobilization
Preventive Medicine Environmental

Range Division Master Planner
Office Management Office
Environmental
Public Affairs Office Directorate of Logistics
Coordinator(s)
Fish & Wildlife

Safety Office Forester
Officer
Figure 5-2. Typical Army installation/garrison organization
5-4
Commanding General
Chief of Staff
AC/S G-3 AC/S G-4 Public Affairs PMO AC/S Legal

Environmental
Ranges/Training Facilities Planning
EOD Health Services Compliance/

Environmental Affairs
Base Safety
Env Inspectors
Fire Dept Natural & Cultural

Resources
Environmental
Training
Figure 5-3. Typical Marine Corps large installation organization
Directorate of Public Works (DPW)
5-16. The DPW usually manages the environmental program at the

installation level. It is responsible for overall program management and
provides input into budget planning, the annual work plan, compliance
monitoring, natural resources, hazardous waste documentation, and
processing notices of violations (NOVs) from the state and federal
government regulatory agencies to the major Army command (MACOM) to
which the installation reports.
• Environmental Management Office (EMO). This office/division is

sometimes separate but is generally a subordinate element of the
DPW. (When it is separate, it is usually referred to as the Directorate
of Environmental Quality [DEQ]). It exists to support the military
training mission and advises commanders and staff personnel on
environmental protection, compliance, and regulations. The office
also monitors environmental compliance and promotes stewardship
through education, customer assistance, and the environmental
compliance inspection program. Its activities require coordination
with federal, state, and local regulatory agencies on issues that
impact installation environmental management programs. The
environmental divisions, headed by environmental coordinator(s), are
located within this office.
− Installation Environmental Coordinator (EC). The EC monitors

activities to ensure they remain in compliance with
environmental laws and regulations. The EC works in the EMO/
Environmental and Natural Resources Division (ENRD) or the
DPW. The EC also develops management plans for
environmental control aspects of facilities and operations,
recommends appropriate training (including unit HW
5-5
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
coordinators), and provides in-house guidance to operators. The

coordinator may or may not have technical and support staff,
depending on the size of the installation and the magnitude of its
environmental problems.
− Forester and Fish and Wildlife Officer. These officers are

normally assigned to the environmental office. The installation
forester is responsible for the forestry program on the installation.
Most of an installation's forests are normally in training areas;
therefore, any training activities that effect the forestry program
and regulations are the concern of this office. The fish and
wildlife officer is responsible for the fish and wildlife management
programs on an installation.
• Master Planner. The installation master planner is responsible for

planning facilities for the installation according to missions, force
structures, and technological advancements for the next 20 years.
The master planner maintains maps, records, and reports for this
planning process. He has current information on the installation's
training areas and plans for their future development.
Directorate of Plans, Training, and Mobilization (DPTM)
5-17. The DPTM is the installation's operations and training office. It

coordinates all training activities, including budgeting, development and
maintenance of training areas, and mission priorities. It has primary
responsibility for ITAM on the installation/base.
5-18. The range officer is the chief of the range division and has overall
responsibility for developing and managing the installation's training ranges.
The range control officer is in charge of range operations, to include
maintaining and enforcing range regulations, coordinating and scheduling
daily range operations, and providing range data to using units. The range
manager is responsible for range maintenance and construction.
Directorate of Logistics (DOL)
5-19. The DOL is responsible for compliance and quality assurance (QA). The
DOL is also responsible for oversight of the Hazardous Materials Control
Center (HMCC), the used-solvent elimination (USE) program, POL
management, hazardous materials tracking (to include MSDSs), and
oversight for transportation, maintenance and ammunition storage. The
DOL works closely with the Safety Office and the Occupational Safety and
Health Administration (OSHA).
Defense Reutilization and Marketing Office (DRMO)
5-20. The DRMO program was established by a DOD directive. Typically,

DRMOs are located at all MACOMs as a tenant activity (not depicted in
Figure 5-2). They work closely with the installation's DOL and
environmental offices to store, sell, or dispose of excess real property (to
include HW). The DRMO is usually the designated storage facility for all HW
5-6
generated at the installation. Whether or not a DRMO is on an installation,

you must first coordinate your disposal requirements with your
environmental office.
Safety Office
5-21. This office is responsible for the HAZCOM program and training that
includes leaders’ and supervisors’ responsibility of hazards in the workplace,
notification of hazards, and necessary precautions to protect soldiers/Marines.
It interfaces with OSHA on safety-related issues and is responsible for
installation/base-wide OSHA compliance. It provides support for managing
HM, to include worker-protection guidance and inspection assistance.
Public Affairs Office (PAO)
5-22. The PAO is the official spokesperson for the installation and manages
public involvement activities and responses (particularly in public
controversy situations) in close coordination with key installation leaders.
The PAO advises the commander on methods of conveying information to the
public.
Directorate of Health Services/Preventive Medicine Office
5-23. This office is responsible for a variety of health-related areas such as

field sanitation, asbestos screening, health and safety inspections,
occupational health services and compliance with OSHA regulations. This
office provides required respiratory and protective support and conducts and
maintains baseline medical surveys. Preventive Medicine advises the
commander and staff on regional health matters within the commander’s
area of interest. It assists in determining the public health implications of
damages to critical environmental resources. (See Chapter 7.)
Provost Marshal Office (PMO)
5-24. The PMO personnel are responsible for evacuating and securing
designated hazardous sites. They are often involved in cases where
hazardous spills pose imminent health and safety problems. They may also
oversee the game warden.
Fire and Emergency Services
5-25. This department provides fire fighting support to the installation/base

and conducts and maintains safety surveys. The Fire Chief is generally the
designated Emergency Coordinator and maintains the Installation Spill
Contingency Plan (ISCP). He is also generally the Installation On-Scene
Coordinator (IOSC) who coordinates all types of emergency response efforts.
Normally organized under the DPW for the Army, or the G4 for the Marines.
5-7
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
Environmental Quality Control Committee (EQCC)
5-26. Each installation except satellite installations has an EQCC as directed

by AR 200-1. In oversea areas, the EQCC may be organized at the military
community level and includes major and satellite installations and tenant
activities. The EQCC advises the installation commander concerning
environmental issues and assists in formulating installation environmental
policy. It consists of the installation commander, who chairs the committee;
the DPW, who acts as the executive secretary; and representatives of each
directorate and staff section. Tenant units are encouraged to have
representatives attend the EQCC meetings.
SUPPORT PLANNING AND EXECUTION
5-27. Environmental support planning projects long-term requirements to

sustain and support a large concentration of military units within a specified
area for an indefinite period. This support necessitates extensive planning
for environmental impact assessment, natural and cultural resources
management, and restoration. Most often, this planning applies to
installations in the US; however, many bases in foreign countries have
similar requirements. This planning is conducted primarily though the lead
of the garrison staff in support of the installation commander and the units
assigned to or training at the installation.
NEPA/EO 12114 ANALYSIS
5-28. The NEPA defines a process of environmental analysis that presents an

opportunity for leaders to reduce environmental-related risk. However, given
the technical requirements for a NEPA analysis and documentation, it is
difficult to execute below division level. Deployments for actual military
operations do not require compliance with NEPA when these activities fall
under category number one, emergencies. However, deployments for
nonemergency operations, such as construction projects or major training
exercises within CONUS, may require a NEPA analysis. Deployments and
operations OCONUS may also require analysis under the provisions of EO
12114 (see Appendix A). The level of environmental consideration depends
on the scope of the action, the extent of public interest, and the potential for
environmental impacts. In the first phase of the NEPA process, the
commander reviews the proposed action to determine the significant
environmental impacts he can anticipate and the changes that may eliminate
these impacts.
5-29. AR 200-2 (MCO P5090.2A provides similar information) defines the five
categories of action as:
• Emergencies (these do not require NEPA analysis).
• Actions exempted from NEPA analysis by law.
• Actions categorically excluded from NEPA analysis.
• Actions requiring analysis.
5-8
• Actions requiring analysis and possible mitigation.
5-30. As described in AR 200-2 and MCO P5090.2A, a NEPA requires the

analysis of all federal agency actions, including military actions, to determine
potential environmental impacts. Commanders must know the results of this
analysis before they make a final decision to proceed with the action. In
other words, the analysis’ outcome becomes a factor in decision making.
Examples of actions requiring environmental analysis under NEPA include
the following: training exercises, maneuvers, and deployments in the air, on
land, and on the water; flight operations, overall operation of permanent or
temporary facilities; construction projects; and more.
5-31. An environmental review determines if the commander can exempt the

proposed action from the environmental analysis and documentation process
or if he must prepare an environmental assessment (EA) or environmental
impact statement (EIS). If the commander cannot exempt the action, it
requires an EA. This short analysis determines the extent of environmental
impacts in a proposed action. If the proposed action will result in significant
impacts, the commander prepares an EIS. (An EA is not always required
before preparing an EIS.) If the EA shows the proposed action will not result
in a significant impact, the commander prepares a finding of no significant
impact (FONSI) and has it distributes it for public comment.
5-32. Unit training exercises on installations may also require environmental

analysis. Units may obtain support from the installation/base facilities
engineer, DPW, or the Installation Environmental Coordinator or his staff to
determine if an EA is required.
5-33. The unit commander is the action proponent for NEPA requirements
and is responsible for completing of the NEPA analysis. If the action falls
within categories four and five, the analysis must also be published for public
review and comment. If significant impact is possible, the commander
prepares an EIS and forwards it for service HQ approval. After approval, the
service HQ distributes the draft EIS to appropriate regulatory agencies. The
draft EIS provides decision makers and the public with a complete and
objective evaluation of the significant environmental impacts—both beneficial
and adverse—resulting from the proposed action and all reasonable
alternatives.
5-34. Preparation is often time consuming and costly. After the commander
distributes the draft EIS for public and agency comment, he prepares the
final EIS and a concise public record of decision (ROD), which explains the
rationale for the decision. In any case, the commander must complete the
analysis before making a final determination as to whether or not to carry out
the action. Installation commanders should ensure that installation/base
facilities engineers, DPW, and the Installation Environmental Coordinator
have systems in place to expedite and simplify this process. These systems
should include baseline data to enable the unit commander to reach a
decision.
5-9
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
INTEGRATED NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLANNING (INRMP)
5-35. Federal law requires all installations within the US and its territories
to manage natural and cultural resources entrusted to them. Installations
must provide optimum public benefit and support the military mission.
Installation commanders accomplish this requirement through INRMP and
their Cultural Resources Management Plan (CRMP). Both INRMP and the
CRMP pertain to those installations located in the US or its overseas
possessions. The OEBGD and the final governing standards (FGS) include
the natural resource management requirements of installations located in
foreign countries.
5-36. The INRMP integrates natural resource planning in three ways. First,
it consolidates all natural resources management requirements into a single
planning document. Second, it integrates natural resources management
with the installation’s military mission. Finally, the INRMP coordinates
natural resources planning for installation ecosystem features consistent with
those of the surrounding area. INRMP addresses forestry, fish and wildlife,
wetlands, outdoor recreation, soil resources management, training and
testing requirements, and agricultural and grazing lease management. It
also incorporates aspects of the CRMP, the Army’s ITAM plan, the integrated
pest management plan (IPMP), storm water management plans, and other
plans that effect or are effected by natural resources management.
5-37. The CRMP is the installation’s framework for managing cultural

resources, including prehistoric sites, historic buildings, structures, and
districts, traditional cultural properties, and Native American sacred sites on
Army-controlled properties. It also outlines procedures for integrating
cultural resources management responsibilities with mission requirements.
5-38. Both of these plans specify how installations meet specific legal
requirements for natural and cultural resources management, including
requirements applicable to military units and soldiers.
INTEGRATED TRAINING AREA MANAGEMENT (ITAM)
5-39. Installations in the US and overseas manage ranges, training areas,

and facilities that are critical to unit training. DOD regulations require
installations to protect the forests, wildlife, wetlands, and shorelines
associated with these areas and facilities. Installations must also manage
these training areas to ensure their continued availability for training.
Without this ongoing effort, training opportunities would be rapidly decline
with a corresponding reduction in the ability to be properly trained to
perform our primary mission.
5-40. To manage these resources, installations use the ITAM program.

Within ITAM, the Land Rehabilitation and Maintenance (LRAM) program
conducts revegetation and erosion control to repair damaged lands and
prevent soil erosion, site degradation and water pollution. The Land
Condition Trend Analysis (LCTA) program conducts monitoring and
biological inventories. The focus of LCTA is to monitor the effects of training
on threatened and endangered species, soils, vegetation, wildlife and
5-10
wetlands. ITAM provides a management and decision-making process to

integrate military training and other mission requirements for land use with
sound natural resource management of land. For a more focused discussion
on ITAM, see AR 350-4. ITAM responsibility at installation/base level
generally resides with the DPTM. However, in USAREUR, these DPTM
functions may be located in the ASG or the BSB.
INSTALLATION RESTORATION PLANNING (IRP)
5-41. The IRP is a comprehensive program that identifies, investigates, and

cleans up contamination at Army installations within CONUS. The IRP
focuses on cleaning up contamination associated with past Army activities.
5-42. Restoration activities on an installation do not normally involve tenant

units unless the area requiring remediation is in the unit’s area. The unit is
responsible, however, for avoiding the creation of future HW contamination
sites by employing proper environmental protection practices.
MOBILIZATION, DEPLOYMENT, REDEPLOYMENT AND DEMOBILIZATION (MDRD) PLANNING
5-43. Industrial operations, acquisition services, and training area

management support the installation’s routine missions. They also provide
significant support to operations during mobilization/demobilization and
deployments/redeployments. Unanticipated costs and delays can be avoided
with proper environmental consideration and integrated planning functions.
Installation personnel responsible for environmental protection, should
inform force projection planners when coordination efforts reveal the
possibility of shortfalls and limiting factors such as:
• Exceeding the installation’s carrying capacity in billeting space,

utilities, and training areas. Large numbers of troop units may cause
an installation to exceed its air, wastewater, and HM permit levels.
• Requirements for additional natural resource or special use permits

as the operations tempo (OPTEMPO) in the training area increases.
• Establishing marshalling areas at aerial points of departure (APODs)

or railheads to relieve overcrowded transportation facilities. Units
establishing temporary motor pools in runoff areas may threaten
surface water or watersheds.
• Off-loading fuel from vehicles at APODs and railheads to reach

permissible fuel tank limits increases the likelihood of POL or
HM/HW spills. Off-loading fuel also places additional temporary
storage requirements on the installation’s industrial operations.
5-44. Many of these environmental issues can be resolved during the

planning stages of mobilization and demobilization. After a major
deployment/ redeployment, installations may have significant clean up
requirements. Since the first priority of the installation during mobilization/
demobilization and deployment/redeployment missions is to provide for
smooth deployment of active and reserve component units, installations must
5-11
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
consider these environmental costs as routine operating expenses. However,

installation planners should make every attempt to minimize environmental
damage to avoid costs and potential legal disruptions to the mission (as well
as preserving the environment).
5-45. Installation and unit planners incorporate environmental requirements

into mobilization/demobilization and deployment/redeployment plans. While
some federal laws have national emergency or national defense clauses that
provide relief from or alternative methods; many do not. State and local
regulations are less likely to contain such clauses. Planners must know
which regulations contain special clauses, as well as the procedures for
obtaining necessary variances or waivers.
5-46. Mobilization/demobilization plans list potential environmental

problems and provide procedures to minimize their cost and impact.
Additionally, units establish environmental protection measures as part of
their deployment/redeployment SOPs and as training objectives in readiness
exercises.
5-47. Personnel who perform cost-estimates for mobilization/demobilization

and deployment/redeployment consider the constantly changing set of
environmental regulations and permits. These personnel also recognize that
costs will be inversely proportional to the state of deployment/redeployment
training of the mobilization/demobilization units.
PLANNING FOR UNITS STATIONED OCONUS
5-48. Many units stationed in foreign countries (i.e., Germany, Korea, or

Japan) must meet similar planning requirements. Furthermore, the
planning guidelines of US environmental laws and requirements seldom
apply. Units stationed in foreign country follow the guidance provided in the
overseas environmental baseline guidance document (OEBGD) unless a FGS
is available for that specific HN; if available, takes precedence. Units
performing contingency operations or combat operations follow the
environmental guidance provided in the OPLAN. Early planning for base
camps and their environmental considerations are essential to ensure
success.
5-49. A unified command nominates service components to DOD for

appointment as environmental executive agents (EEA), and DOD appoints an
executive agent to prepare the FGS (may be a unified command). The
executive agent normally delegates that responsibility to a major command
who drafts the FGS by comparing HN environmental criteria to those
contained in the DOD OEBGD. This comparison includes a review of
applicable HN laws, base rights or status of forces agreements, other
international agreements, and current procedures.
5-50. In foreign countries where HN environmental standards do not exist,

are not applicable, or provide less protection to human health and the natural
environment than the baseline guidance, US military forces follow the
OEBGD standards.
5-12
5-51. Although NEPA does not apply overseas, units stationed in foreign
countries must still consider the environmental impacts of major actions. EO
12114 establishes internal procedures for federal agencies, including the
armed forces, to consider the significant environmental effects of their actions
OCONUS. (DOD guidance associated with EO 12114 is DOD Directive
[DODD] 6050.7, soon to be republished as DOD Instruction [DODI] 4715.xx).
Exemptions to this requirement include armed conflict, specified contingency
operations, intelligence activities, and arms transfers. Overseas theaters
have published regulations to guide units regarding specific procedures in
each of the countries or regions where US installations or forces are located.
UNIT AND INSTALLATION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANCE
5-52. Both the higher unit staff and the installation/garrison/base staff
provide expertise and assistance for environmental assistance. One of the
primary keys to a successful unit environmental program is to ask questions
and know where to go for help. A directory of key environmental topics and
corresponding POCs at both the unit and the installation/base is provided at
Figure 5-4. Environmental information hotlines are also provided in
Appendix G.
5-53. Refer to Chapter 6 for a discussion of how to establish a unit program

and understand how the installation/garrison/base organizations support the
commander in both establishing and assessing a unit program.
Topic Point of Contact

Air pollution EMO
Audits/ECAS EMO
Archeological and historic sites EMO, range control (DPTM)
Clean/safe water EMO
Command Environmental Issues Tactical Chain of
Command/EQCC/Environmental Compliance
Review Board (ECRB)
Environmental training G3/S3, EMO
HAZCOM training G3/S3, safety office, fire department
Hazardous materials G4/S4, DOL, safety office, fire department
Hazardous waste G4/S4, EMO, DRMO
Laws and regulations G1/S1, EMO, JAG/legal office
Noise pollution EMO, range control (DPTM)
Range clearances/restrictions Range control (DPTM)
Recycling program G4/S4, EMO
Standing operating procedures G3/S3 and G4/S4, EMO
Spill reporting/planning G3/S3 and G4/S4, EMO, fire department
Threatened/endangered species EMO
Water pollution EMO, G3/S3 and G4/S4
Wetland protection EMO, range control
Wildlife management EMO, range control, PMO
Figure 5-4.5-4.
Figure Environmental assistance
Environmental assistance
5-13
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
SUMMARY
5-54. BASOPS are critical to the success of the unit in its day-to-day
operations and especially in support of training on, or in the proximity of, the
installation. Whenever possible, leaders must actively seek and use this
expertise and assistance. Although the chain-of-command and unit staffs
also provide support in an installation setting, the garrison staff is
specifically designed to provide the required expertise to support units. When
deployed in an operational status, the assistance and assets of installations
may not be available to the unit. In these cases units may draw support from
the organization that supports their base camp or some similar site. The
higher unit staffs will increase their focus on their environmental
consideration roles given the absence of an installation/ garrison/base staff.
Base camps are operational facilities and not installations, although many of
the same environmental requirements will exist. Refer to Appendix D for
additional sources of environmental assistance.
5-55. This chapter provides the basic information, or references leaders will
need to establish and assess a unit environmental program as identified in
Chapter 6.
5-14
Chapter 6
Establishing and Assessing a Unit Program

“The unit does well what the commander checks.”
General Bruce C. Clarke
Chapter 5 introduced the installation/garrison/base organizations,

responsibilities and support to units stationed at, or performing training
on an installation/base. Chapter 6 illustrates how that structure
supports leaders in establishing and assessing a unit program. Unit-level
environmental programs require guidance and support from the chain of
command. Army major Army commands (MACOMs) and Marine Corps
higher HQs conduct environmental assistance visits to ensure that
installations comply with appropriate environmental laws. Unit leaders
coordinate with the installation’s environmental office and their higher
HQ for assistance visits and compliance audits within the unit area.
Additionally, unit leaders or their designated representatives, conduct
self-assessments to determine how well their unit is following
environmental protection measures at the unit level. Unit leaders
incorporate certain environmental protection measures into the unit’s
SOP to ensure their soldiers and Marines use appropriate environmental
protection measures.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
6-1. The Army and Marine Corps determine environmental compliance

status in two ways. Federal, state, and local regulatory agencies conduct
formal compliance audits and spot checks on installations and report their
findings to the military chain of command. Additionally, each service
provides installation inspections under the Army’s ECAS or Marine Corp’s
ECE. Installations conduct internal evaluations, while Army MACOMs or
Marine Corps higher HQs conduct external evaluations. Federal, state, or
local inspections may result in civil and criminal penalties for noncompliance
with environmental laws and regulations. Self-assessment can be conducted
using the installation status report software (Part II – Environmental).
When afloat or under Naval authority, commanders should become familiar
with Naval Warfare Publication (NWP) 4-11 for further guidance to
incorporate environmental considerations into naval force operations.
FEDERAL AND STATE REGULATORY INSPECTIONS
6-2. Regulatory agencies, such as the Environmental Protection Agency

(EPA), have the legal right and responsibility to inspect units and facilities to
6-1
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
ensure compliance with environmental laws and regulations. These agencies

usually coordinate inspections through the installation’s environmental office.
The agencies may, however, conduct inspections without notice.
6-3. The EPA and Federal Facilities Compliance Act (FFCA) set inspection
frequency guidelines. For example, inspections for HW facilities under the
RCRA generally occur annually.
6-4. Inspections in other programs may occur at different frequencies.

Installations and units with specific major problems can expect frequent
follow-up inspections that may include checks of training records and
documentation, permit reviews, and storage facilities.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM/ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE

EVALUATION
6-5. In the US, regulatory agencies (i.e., state agencies, the EPA, or the US
Fish and Wildlife Service [USFWS]) conclusively determine installation
compliance with environmental laws and regulations. However, many
environmental regulations require self-regulation in which case the
installation monitors its own programs and notifies the regulatory agency
when problems occur.
6-6. Military services conduct internal compliance assessments for their

installations. Units participate in these assessments, which review all
aspects of the installation’s environmental status to include the following:
• Training.
• Planning and programming.
• Resourcing.
• Correcting past deficiencies.
• Preventing pollution.
• Managing natural and cultural resources.
• Complying with emissions standards.
• Maintaining records and reports.
6-7. The Army established the ECAS, and the Marines established the ECE,
as a means of achieving, maintaining, and monitoring compliance with
applicable environmental laws. In addition, the Army and Marine Corps use
compliance assessments as a vehicle to attain environmental program goals.
6-8. Service regulations require units with HW and HM to conduct internal

inspections. HW coordinators for larger units can request a copy of the
ECAS/ECE protocol to assist in developing inspections and record-keeping
plans. The installation’s HW management plan should contain sufficient
6-2
information to develop an inspection plan for a unit’s HW generation points

and accumulation sites. Units should contact the environmental office for
ECAS/ECE protocol or for ECAS/ECE checklists to conduct an internal self-
assessment.
6-9. OCONUS MACOM commanders determine the scope of compliance

assessment within their commands based on the SOFA and FGS
requirements for the country in which they are located. In the absence of an
FGS, OCONUS MACOM commanders use the OEBGD. These requirements
govern the activities of the supporting installation, and installation
requirements direct unit assessment activities.
6-10. Unit leaders set the tone for environmental compliance within their
units. They bring focus, direction, and commitment to environmental
protection. Their role requires them to demonstrate commitment, organize
for success, train their units, resource the effort, and build the unit's
environmental ethic. The success of the unit-level environmental program
depends on: receiving adequate guidance and support from the chain of
command and installation environmental office, increasing communication at
all levels, and establishing an effective management structure.
Environmental protection must be incorporated into command policy and
guidance and enhanced through the chain of command.
6-11. Leadership direction and support are needed to implement

improvements in all facets of environmental stewardship. To that end, unit
leaders must ensure that units have active and strong environmental
programs that support the installation's environmental program. This
chapter addressed typical programs that the unit leader ensures are in place
or supported.
ESTABLISHING A UNIT-LEVEL PROGRAM
6-12. To establish an effective unit environmental program, the unit leader

should:
• Ensure all unit personnel have had environmental awareness

training. Environmental training sources are identified in Chapter 3.
Sources of assistance at the installation/garrison/ base are provided in
Chapter 5. Appendix D provides sources of environmental assistance
for all operations. Units should use sources that are closest to them
before they seek additional/ outside assistance.
• Designate an ECO or a HM/HW Marine who is properly trained and

qualified. This individual will interface with appropriate
environmental personnel and ensure that the unit is in compliance
with environmental laws and regulations.
• Meet with key higher unit staff counterparts (battalion S3/S4 for a
company-sized organization) and installation personnel who deal with
environmental issues. Find out what their requirements are
concerning environmental training, qualifications, and certification of
6-3
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
unit personnel, ECAS inspections that may effect the unit, and
common environmental problem areas and how to avoid them.
• Ensure the unit has a well-written SOP that addresses environmental

issues and procedures that apply to the unit (coordinate
environmental requirements with appropriate installation/chain of
command personnel). An example is provided at Appendix C.
6-13. The following are unit or installation environmental programs that

units develop or adopt:
• HM management.
• HW management.
• HAZCOM.
• Pollution prevention and hazardous waste minimization (HAZMIN).
• Recycling program.
• Spill prevention/response plan.
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
6-14. The Army's objective is to minimize health hazards and environmental

damage caused by the use and misuse of HM. A hazardous material is one
that, because of its quantity, concentration, physical, chemical, or infectious
characteristics, may do the following:
• Cause, or significantly contribute to, an increase in mortality or an

increase in serious, irreversible, or incapacitating reversible illness.
• Pose a substantial present or potential hazard to human health or the

environment when improperly treated, stored, transported, disposed
of, or otherwise managed.
6-15. If a unit deals with HM, leaders should do the following:
• Ensure the best management practices for all HM.
• Comply with all applicable regulations, policies, and procedures.
• Order and use only what is required; do not stockpile HM.
• Use nonhazardous substitutes to the maximum extent practicable.
• Conserve resources through recovery, recycling, and reuse.
• Establish procedures to identify and correct management deficiencies.
6-4
• Establish a training program and ensure that required personnel are

properly trained.
• Ensure adequate spill prevention and control equipment are on hand.
• Coordinate training requirements with the chain of command and the

installation EMO/safety officer.
• Comply with the chain of command and installation HM

requirements.
• Ensure compliance with special disposal/turn-in procedure for

batteries.
• Establish HM spill procedures.
• Establish HM fire/explosion procedures.
• Establish emergency first aid procedures.
• Ensure that adequate protective equipment is available.
• Refer to applicable HM references.
− AR 200-1.
− AR 700-141.
− Title 40, CFR, part 761.
− TM 38-410.
HAZARDOUS WASTE
6-16. The presence of HW is a cause for concern among installation personnel

and nearby residential populations. Yet, hazardous substances are an
unavoidable part of Army and Marine Corps activities and ultimately result
in some waste generation. The proper handling and disposal of these wastes
will minimize danger and ensure the safety of people and the environment. If
a unit deals with HW, leaders should do the following:
• Establish an HW management program to comply with HW

regulations.
• Ensure HW is properly identified. Label stored waste and the

containers that hold HW with the correct danger and warning signs.
• Ensure wastes do not accumulate beyond allowable quantity and time

limits.
• Maintain proper HW records, and report periodically, as required by

EPA.
6-5
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
• Employ waste minimization techniques as a part of pollution

prevention efforts.
• Ensure compliance with on-post HW transportation requirements.

Contact the installation DRMO or DOL for details.
• Ensure compliance with off-post HW transportation requirements.

Public road use increases transportation requirements. Contact
installation DOL/FMO for movement approval.
• Ensure drivers transporting HW are qualified. Transporters of HM

must be trained by law, according to DOT HM 181 and 126F.
• Establish an HW training program, and ensure proper personnel

training occurs. Most installations conduct HW train-the-trainer
programs.
• Maintain a liaison with key chain of command and installation

personnel.
• Appoint an ECO/(HW/HM) Marine to the unit.
• Ensure the unit ECO/(HM/HW) Marine has sufficient support to

carry out his duties.
• Ensure unit personnel use their PPE when handling HW.
• Ensure adequate spill prevention and control equipment is on hand.
• Establish HW fire/explosion procedures.
• Establish HW spill/leak procedures.
• Ensure that unauthorized storage or disposal of HW does not occur.

HW must be stored only in authorized containers and disposed of as
directed by the EMO/DRMO.
• Refer to applicable HW references.
− AR 200-1.
− AR 420-47.
− RCRA.
− Title 40, CFR, parts 259, 260-281, 300-302, 761.
− Title 49, CFR, parts 106-178.
6-6
− TM 38-410.
HAZARDOUS COMMUNICATIONS
6-17. An effective HAZCOM program will assist leaders to determine what

hazardous chemicals are present in their units, how to protect their soldiers
from hazards those chemicals present, and how to properly store and use
those chemicals. The installation safety officer is the POC for most HAZCOM
matters, the MSDS program, and the HAZCOM training program.
On 13 April 1994, 1SG Smith became the First Sergeant of Company C, 3/151st
Infantry, Fort Yukon. One of his first actions was to conduct a walk through the
unit area with the platoon sergeants. While in the 2nd platoon's area, the 1SG
found a locked room, which the platoon sergeant unlocked. Inside was a
collection of cans, bottles, and other containers filled with various solvents and
cleaning products. The 1SG told the platoon sergeant to clean up the room. The
platoon sergeant passed on the order to the squad leader responsible for the
room. The squad leader and his squad quickly removed the room's contents,
placing the various containers in the dumpster behind the dining facility. Shortly
thereafter, mess personnel placed lunch meal waste into the same dumpster.
Almost immediately, the dumpster began to burn and let off large amounts of
strange looking smoke. The Fort Yukon Fire Department was called. Upon
arrival, the fire chief noticed the smoke's strange color and odor, and determined
that it was a chemical fire. Subsequent inquiry determined that the unit's
personnel needed training on identifying, storing, and disposing of hazardous
material and hazardous waste. The unit's leaders learned that precise orders
needed to be given and that those receiving them should seek clarification for
unclear matters.
Would this incident have happened in the first place had this unit had effective
unit-level environmental programs?
6-18. In support of HAZCOM, unit leaders should do the following:
• Ensure their subordinates receive adequate training on HM to which

they are exposed, in accordance with the OSHA requirement.
• Maintain an up-to-date list of all HM/HW known to be present in

their area.
• Ensure containers of hazardous substances are labeled, tagged, or

otherwise marked to identify the material and warn soldiers of
hazards.
• Maintain a MSDS for every HM in their unit (see Appendix C).
• Ensure soldiers/Marines are trained to recognize, understand, and

use the MSDS and labels for the HM to which they are exposed.
• Ensure soldiers/Marines use proper procedures when working with

hazardous substances.
• Refer to applicable HAZCOM references.
6-7
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
− AR 40-5.
− AR 385-10.
− AR 700-141.
POLLUTION PREVENTION AND HAZARDOUS WASTE MINIMIZATION (HAZMIN)
6-19. This program compliments the HM/HW/HAZCOM programs. HAZMIN

means reducing the amount and toxicity of the HW generated or produced.
Pollution prevention means reducing the amount of material, whether it is
hazardous or not. For example, recycle to reduce the amount of trash that
goes into landfills.
6-20. Unit leaders should ensure their units conduct inventory control. A
unit should not stockpile HM. If a HM has an expired shelf life, it can cost
much more to dispose of the item than it did to obtain it, since the HM will
have to be handled as an HW.
6-21. Product substitution is an easy way to reduce HW generation. Unit

personnel should review the HM inventory in their areas and check if there
are nonhazardous or less hazardous substitutes available. Examples are
using solvents or replacing the sand used in sandblasting operations with
plastic beads, which last longer and can be recycled.
6-22. A process change can reduce the amount of HW generated. A vapor

degreaser could be replaced by a soap-and-hot-water parts cleaner. Changing
processes in painting operations can reduce overspray and pollution;
however, the waste water still needs to be treated as HW, since paint
particles can become waste material.
• Refer to applicable pollution prevention and HAZMIN references.
− AR 200-1.
− EPA/625/7-88/003.
− EO 12856.
− Title III, Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (PL101-549).
− Title 40, CFR, part 262.41.
− United States Army Environmental Hygiene Agency (USAEHA),

Trainer’s Guide (TG) No. 178.
− Environmental Product Guide.
6-8
RECYCLING PROGRAM
6-23. The Army and Marine Corps are promoting separating products,
substituting materials, and changing procedures to avoid the use of
hazardous substances (source reduction), and recycling to reduce the volume
of solid waste. Most installations have a recycling program. To support that
program, personnel should do the following:
• Recycle all recyclable materials. Recyclable materials include

computer printouts, corrugated cardboard, computer punch cards,
newspaper, high grade white paper, aluminum cans, plastics, oil,
solvents, glass, steel, and brass. Check with the installation
environmental office to verify the material being recycled locally.
• Separate the recycling material source is separated. Contaminated

material must be removed from recyclables.
• Refer to applicable recycling references.
− AR 200-1.
− EO 13101.
SPILL PREVENTION AND RESPONSE PLAN
6-24. It is Army and Marine Corps policy and a Clean Water Act requirement
to prevent oil and hazardous substance spills and to provide prompt response
to contain and clean up spills. The discharge of oil or hazardous substance
from installations, vehicles, aircraft, and watercraft into the environment
without a discharge permit is prohibited. Exceptions will be made in cases of
extreme emergency, in which where the discharge is:
• Considered essential to protect human life.
• Authorized by a discharge permit or installation on-scene coordinator

(IOSC) during a spill incident response.
6-25. Every reasonable precaution should be taken to prevent spills of oil and
hazardous substances. The unit leader should:
• Provide facilities to store, handle, or use oils and hazardous

substances and implement proper safety and security measures.
• Appoint a spill coordinator and members of the unit spill response

team; this designation should be in writing.
• Maintain an up-to-date spill response plan. This requirement is

generated by the installation.
• Conduct periodic spill response drills.
6-9
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
• Ensure sufficient equipment and supplies (absorbent materials) for

spill responses are on hand and pre-positioned in the unit. See
Appendix C for a sample list.
• Locate all drains, drainage ditches, streams, ponds, and other water
sources/outlets in the area, and plan how to prevent a spill from
reaching them.
• Coordinate with the installation safety office, preventive medicine

office, and EMO to determine the proper PPE. Know when to
attempt to clean up a spill and when to leave the area and contact the
installation spill response team for cleanup. This determination will
be made by the installation EMO and/or spill response team.
• Maintain a copy of the Installation Spill Contingency Plan (ISCP).

Critical/necessary information is contained in this plan, available
from the environmental management office.
• Maintain a current list of names and phone numbers of those who

may need to be contacted in case of an emergency (i.e., fire
department, safety office, provost marshal, and preventive medicine,
EMO).
• Maintain an up-to-date inventory of all HM/HW; provide a copy to the

post fire department for use in case of a chemical fire.
• Ensure pollutants are not discharged into storm or washrack drains

or poured on the ground.
• Ensure small spills are properly attended to, cleaned up, and
collected. Contaminated soil needs to be disposed of properly.
Contact the installation EMO for additional information.
• Strictly control the discharge of ballast water from watercraft.
• Ensure the treatment of waste oil complies with all applicable federal,
state, and local requirements.
• Ensure wastes produced during the cleaning of fuel storage tanks and
combustion engine components are collected and treated as required
before discharge.
• Monitor wastewater discharges containing oil or hazardous

substances to comply with permit limits.
• Report oil, fuel, or other hazardous pollutant spills are reported to the
EMO and higher headquarters. The S4/G4 and the post EMO can
provide information on reportable spill quantities.
• Establish HM/HW fire/explosion procedures.
6-10
• Refer to applicable spill prevention references.
− AR 200-1 (general).
− Title 40, CFR, part 110 (oil), 302 (hazardous substances), 355
(extremely hazardous substance).
PROGRAM ASSESSMENT
6-26. Environmental compliance status can be determined through a formal

inspection by a regulatory agency. It can also be determined through self
inspections using ECAS checklists as a guide. Non-Army or Marine Corps
regulatory agencies have the legal right and responsibility to inspect units
and individual facilities and actions to ensure compliance. Often the first
indication that federal, state, or other inspectors are on post is when they
visit the installation environmental coordinator's office, or the provost
marshal's office, asking for directions to a specific site on the installation.
6-27. Once a year, EPA inspectors conduct spot inspections of installations,

often without notice. Local and state inspectors also conduct frequent
inspections. Regulatory inspections often concentrate on a particular area,
such as HW management. Inspection frequency guidelines have been
established under the EPA Federal Facility Compliance Strategy. For
example, inspections for HW facilities under the RCRA generally occur
annually. Inspections in other programs may occur at different frequencies.
Installations and units with specific major problems can expect more frequent
follow-up inspections.
6-28. The Army established the ECAS as a means of achieving and

monitoring compliance with applicable federal, state, regional, and local
environmental laws and regulations. In addition, the Army uses compliance
assessment as a vehicle for attaining Army environmental program goals and
improving program visibility. If a unit deals with HW and HM, leaders are
required to conduct internal inspections. HW coordinators for larger units
can request a copy of the ECAS protocol to assist in developing inspections
and recordkeeping plans. However, the installation HW management plan
should normally contain information sufficient to develop an inspection plan
for HW generation points and accumulation sites at the unit level. Contact
the environmental office for an ECAS protocol to conduct an internal/self-
compliance assessment.
6-29. OCONUS commanders determine the scope for the ECAS within their
commands. They often implement procedures to ensure compliance with
applicable host nation, SOFA, and FGS requirements, as well as the
requirements of AR 200-1 and AR 200-2.
6-30. G3/S3 and G4/S4 personnel can help to ensure compliance. Appendix H
has a generic aid that can be used to assess unit environmental compliance
status. The battalion staff or installation environmental office may have
similar aids specific to a unit or location. Key installation and personnel for
compliance assistance are discussed in Chapter 5.
6-11
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
UNIT SELF-ASSESSMENT
6-31. Unit leaders use the general checklist in Appendix H to assess unit
environmental compliance status. Higher level staffs within the chain of
command or the installation’s environmental office may have similar aids
specific to a unit or location. Units also use ECAS/ECE checklists as a
supplement to the self-assessment guide in Appendix H. Unit leaders, with
the assistance of the installation’s environmental staff, determine the
frequency of self-assessment checks. The commander ensures that the unit’s
environmental program management system is effective through self-
assessment.
UNIT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
6-32. Many environmental requirements at the unit level are simply an

extension of existing unit management practices. The most basic is ordering
only enough supplies to do the job. The presence of HM makes this practice
even more important. HM disposal is expensive and carries with it a
significant administrative burden.
Hazardous Substance Management System (HSMS)
6-33. The Army’s HSMS is applys centralized management and strict

inventory control to reduce the use and disposal requirements for hazardous
substances by tracking HM.
Good Housekeeping
6-34. Good housekeeping is another basic management practice. It involves a

number of activities in areas such as maintenance, operations, and training.
For instance, preventing spills is a good housekeeping practice for both safety
and environmental reasons. Keeping noise to a minimum is good OPSEC,
and it also reduces noise pollution. Recycling diminishes solid waste and
helps eliminate unauthorized disposal of some types of HW.
SOP
6-35. Effective management practices require rules that soldiers and Marines
understand and follow. Unit leaders ensure that the unit has a well-written
SOP addressing environmental issues and procedures. (See Appendix C for a
sample of a unit environmental SOP.)
ECO and HW/HM Marine
6-36. Commanders, down to the company, troop, and battery levels, must
designate an ECO. AR 200-1 now requires Army unit commanders to appoint
the ECO in writing and provide training for the ECO. The ECO coordinates
with the installation’s environmental staff and ensures the unit complies with
environmental laws and regulations. MCO P1200.7S identifies the specific
duties for the Marine version of the ECO, the HW/HM (MOS 9954) Marine.
This MOS is assigned as a secondary MOS for a Marine.
6-12
6-37. Unit commanders must consider unit missions and environmental

requirements when designating the ECO and selecting appropriate training.
Once appointed and trained, the ECO becomes the commander’s “eyes and
ears” on environmental matters.
Training
6-38. Training is another important management practice. Commanders

ensure that all unit personnel complete environmental awareness training.
The environmental training resources addressed in Chapter 5 and Appendix
D provide information/POCs available for training support. Additionally,
commanders must identify those soldiers and Marines who require special
environmental training (RCRA- or OSHA-mandated training). Installation
environmental offices and environmental staffs assist subordinate
commanders to determine specific environmental training requirements.
Commanders check training records quarterly to ensure that environmental
training status is current. See Chapter 3 for a discussion of environmental-
specific training opportunities.
Container Labeling
6-39. Container labeling is a basic management practice often overlooked.

Installation or shipping environmental guidelines specify labeling
requirements. Labeling HM and HW is a legal requirement. Materials not
technically classified as hazardous—cleaning supplies, lubricants, and paints
must also be labeled. Labeling these materials with dates allows supply
personnel to rotate stocks and issue older items first, a procedure called
“first-in-first-out” (FIFO) rotation. FIFO rotation reduces the quantity of out-
of-date materials requiring disposal.
6-40. Finally, each unit must develop and enforce procedures to maintain
complete records of the environmental actions and activities they perform.
For example, DOD has requires each of the component services to record and
archive pesticide use during military applications. This information is
important to document potential risks to human health and the environment
from such practices (and to help establish or eliminate causes of unusual
incidents). An example of this is the continuing investigation to decipher the
causes of many of the ailments associated with Operations Desert
Shield/Desert Storm.
MAINTENANCE
6-41. Unit maintenance activities have significant potential for

environmental impact. Most Army and Marine Corps environmental
programs affect maintenance operations in some way. Some specific areas of
concern are as follow:
Spill Prevention and Response
6-42. Army and Marine Corps policy, as well as federal law, requires units to
prevent spills of oil and hazardous substances and to provide prompt
response to contain and clean up such spills. These laws, regulations, and
6-13
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
policies prohibit any discharge of oil or hazardous substance from

installations, vehicles, aircraft, and watercraft into the environment without
a discharge permit.
6-43. Installation requirements shape spill prevention and response plans for
units within their jurisdiction/command. During deployments, the
deployment order directs spill prevention and response procedures. During
contingency operations or combat, spill prevention and response procedures
are defined by HN or theater guidance and the unit SOP (see Tabs A and B,
Appendix C). Typical unit-level responsibilities include the following:
• Ensuring that the unit SOP complies with the Installation Spill
Contingency Plan (ISCP).
• Providing adequate facilities for storing and handling POL products

and hazardous substances.
• Implementing safety and security measures in areas where spills are

likely (i.e., maintenance areas, fuel points, supply facilities, and
accumulation points.
• Appointing a trained spill coordinator and spill response team.
• Conducting periodic spill response drills.
• Maintaining adequate equipment and supplies for spill response.
• Posting telephone numbers of the installation’s spill response

agencies.
HM/HW Storage and Handling
6-44. Motor pool personnel work with a variety of HM/HW. The unit’s
prescribed load list (PLL) section controls requisitions and receipts for HM
and prepares documentation for turn-in of HW. Mechanics generate HW by
lubricating, servicing, and repairing equipment. Motor pool personnel must:
• Requisition only the minimum amount of HM needed. When possible,

substitute nonhazardous materials.
• Practice inventory control of all HM/HW (to include monitoring HM

shelf life and HW accumulation dates).
• Store HM/HW in approved containers and locations.
• Maintain an MSDS for each HM used.
• Obtain any necessary/applicable permits.
6-14
Refueling
6-45. Refueling operations create significant potential for POL spills and fire
hazards. Units must ensure their SOP includes adequate procedures to
prevent and respond to spills. Fuel handlers require spill response training.
Unit leaders provide all fuel points and refueling vehicles with spill response
kits. Since small spills occur often, fuel handlers must remove contaminated
soil, absorbents, and rags from the refueling site and dispose of them
according to installation guidelines.
SUPPLY
6-46. Unit supply personnel account for all materials during HM/HW
requisition, transportation, storage, and disposal. Unit leaders ensure their
supply personnel observe stringent HM supply economy measures. Units
order only the very minimum amount of HM needed. When possible, supply
personnel order biodegradable, environmentally safe materials.
6-47. When storing products, supply personnel ensure first-in-first-out

(FIFO) stock rotation to minimize the turn-in of out-of-date material. They
also follow installation storage guidelines for marking materials, maintaining
MSDSs, and turning in excess materials to the installation’s “pharmacy”
points. Finally, unit leaders ensure that supply personnel turn-in or dispose
of HM/HW according to local regulations. Compliance includes coordinating
with the local environmental office and DRMO.
NUCLEAR, BIOLOGICAL, CHEMICAL
6-48. HM are used in NBC defense and training. Unit NBC specialists
exercise caution when storing these materials. As with other HM/HW, unit
NBC personnel dispose of materials according to local regulations. Unit
leaders ensure that the unit’s spill response program addresses NBC
activities. Unit NBC specialists also monitor turn-in procedures for:
• Batteries for NBC-related equipment.
• Expired NBC supplies.
• Decontaminants.
• Sampling kits.
• Used NBC filters.
• Decontamination solutions.
• Fog oil and its additives.
UNIT MISSION TRAINING
6-49. Unit mission training is a difficult environmental challenge. Unit

leaders must exercise caution with noise pollution, air pollution, waste
6-15
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
disposal, spill protection, water pollution, and cultural and natural resource
protection. Units check with the installation’s training staff concerning
training area restrictions. During training deployments, unit leaders and
ECOs coordinate, in advance, for environmental guidance due to differing
local, state, or HN regulations. Upon completion of the unit training, units
conduct police of training areas in compliance with installation SOPs.
COMMUNICATIONS
6-50. Modern communication systems use many types of batteries. Used

batteries are considered a HW in most states and therefore, unit personnel
ensure that SOPs specify storage and disposal procedures for each type of
battery in the unit.
OPERATIONS
6-51. Operations at any level of the spectrum of conflict do not automatically

suspend environmental considerations. Higher commanders’ guidance is
critical to determine the risk that will be applied to any operation. Decisions
on risk are a normal part of the MDMP. See Chapters 3, 4, and 5 for more
information about environmental considerations during planning, training,
and operations.
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS
6-52. In addition to meeting the previously stated requirements, some

military units, such as the National Guard (NG) and Reserve Component
(RC) units and units stationed in foreign countries, must follow additional
environmental guidelines.
NG and RC Component Considerations
6-53. Since NG and RC units are seldom co-located with their supporting
HQs, their requirements may differ. NG units routinely operate under
environmental regulations and laws of a particular state. NG units
coordinate through their STARC for environmental guidance when deploying
to installations in other states.
6-54. RC units’ where subordinate units may reside in different states and
comply with substantially different environmental laws. The supporting HQ
develops policies that account for differences in state and local laws and
regulations. Units separated from their supporting installation must ensure
that SOPs and contingency plans adequately address local laws and
regulations.
6-55. Given the distances between NG and RC units and their supporting
HQ, HM/HW turn-in may require alternative methods such as line haul or
contractor removal. The cost of HM/HW turn-in may warrant pollution
prevention initiatives to reduce, reuse, or recycle HM/HW on-site. Solvent
distillation, for example, may provide significant cost savings over
conventional disposal.
6-16
6-56. Disaster relief missions present units with challenging environmental

protection requirements. Units must not add their own HM/HW to the
existing environmental problem. ECOs in NG units coordinate with their
STARC HQ for HM/HW support. Unit ECOs also coordinate regularly with
disaster relief HQ to determine threats from HM/HW exposure—
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) from transformers, POL, or decaying
bodies. Unit leaders ensure their soldiers have appropriate PPE when
exposed to HM/HW in the disaster area.
Units Stationed in Foreign Countries
6-57. Since military units stationed in foreign countries must consider local
environmental policies, the FGS for each country incorporates, and thus
takes precedence over, US federal and state regulations. OCONUS
installations develop programs based on the FGS. Units continue to follow
installation guidelines but may find them very different from US
requirements.
SUMMARY
6-58. Unit commanders are responsible for building and implementing a unit
environmental program. They use the assistance that is available to them on
the installation/garrison/base staffs as well as from unit higher headquarters.
Items to assist that program include such tools as the sample SOP in
Appendix C and the unit self-assessment in Appendix H, which provides a
generic checklist for units to assess compliance with environmental laws and
regulations in their daily operations and activities. Unit leaders should
supplement the checklist with applicable state, local, or HN environmental
requirements. Once supplemented, this checklist serves as the primary tool
for unit environmental assessments. However, self-assessment is only a
guide and does not provide a final determination of compliance. ECAS or
ECE checklists provide a more comprehensive assessment.
6-17
Chapter 7
Health and the Environment
Threats from environmental hazards are not new to the military. To

some extent they have always existed in the work place and other areas
of operation. They may be man-made or occur naturally and may pose a
health threat to personnel. Historically, military preventive medicine
personnel have focused on reducing or eliminating the risks of food-,
water-, waste-, insect-, and rodent-borne illnesses, occupational and
environmental injuries, and heat and cold injuries. Recent deployments,
however, have demonstrated the need to reduce risks from occupational
and environmental exposures to toxic chemicals from industrial facilities,
discarded HM, and common military chemical compounds. This chapter
focuses on the impact environmental conditions have on the health of
service members, rather than how actions taken by service members
impact on the environment.
BACKGROUND
7-1. The medical disciplines that are concerned with preventing disease and
injury and maintaining service members health include:
• Preventive medicine (including environmental sciences and sanitary

engineering).
• Veterinary services.
• Medical laboratory services.
• Medical NBC defense.
Specialists in these disciplines provide commanders and leaders with advice

and develop programs to provide the techniques and procedures that can
protect service members from environmental hazards. These actions
conserve combat power and sustainment resources. The command surgeon
and/or supporting medical activity or command identify the potential
hazards, assess the risks, and recommend courses of action to the
commander. Commanders must decide how they will use this advice and
ensure their units take preventive measures. Medical personnel provide
ongoing support by:
7-0
• Monitoring the area of operations (AO) to determine whether the

hazards have changed.
• Identifying new hazards.
• Ensuring that personnel are applying the command-directed

countermeasures.
7-2. Commanders must ensure that they remain abreast of health hazard
changes in the operational environment. Medical personnel support this
responsibility by recommending medical threat considerations for inclusion
as CCIRs during the IPB process. At the national level, the Armed Forces
Medical Intelligence Center (AFMIC) produces medical intelligence regarding
operations in foreign areas.
CONCEPT OF OPERATIONS
7-3. Medical personnel obtain background information about the AO to

identify health hazards, assess health risks, develop courses of action, and
advise commanders of the risks. They provide the commanders/leaders with
critical information on the risks from identified health hazards. They then
assess these risks, and provide commanders/leaders with recommended
protective/preventive measures for consideration as part of the overall
operational risk management program. Medical personnel continue to
monitor the AO for changes in the level of risk or the identifications of new
hazards. When they detect increases in their risk levels or identify new
health hazards, medical personnel update databases and provide
commanders/leaders with the new information guidance regarding protective
and preventive measures. See DOD Directive (DODD) 6490.2, Joint Medical
Surveillance; DOD Instructions (DODI) 6490.3, Implementation and
Application of Joint Medical Surveillance for Deployments; and 6055.1, DOD
Safety and Occupational Health (SOH) Program; AR 40-3, Medical, Dental,
and Veterinary Care; AR 40-5, Preventive Medicine; and AR 40-216,
Neuropsychiatry and Mental Health; for information about preventive
medicine measures and policies.
7-4. Baseline health status is recorded in the individual health record for all
personnel when they enter military service and, at time of deployment, a field
health record is established. Following exposure to hazardous agents or
materials, individuals receive appropriate medical follow-up, and their health
records are updated. Health records are maintained for the term of
service/employment. See DODD 6490.2 and AR 40-66, Medical Record
Administration and Health Care Documentation.
ENVIRONMENTAL AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH HAZARDS
7-5. Environmental and occupational health hazards can be classified by the

methods of occurrence or origin and include:
• Occupational. Occupational health hazards occur in the duty area

and are caused by specific activities such as exposure to HM (i.e.,
spraying CARC paint without use of respiratory protection), or
7-1
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
dispensing fuels without proper gloves and eye protection. Exposure

may result when HM is used or produced in the duty area, or it may
be the result of accidental HM spillage. Exposure is typically
restricted to those personnel directly involved in the activity or
located closely to the activity site. Typical countermeasures include
substituting a less hazardous material for a more hazardous material;
improving ventilation at the duty site to reduce hazardous pollutant
levels; requiring personnel to use appropriate PPE such as
respiratory protection or safety glasses; or discontinuing the
operation until proper procedures can be used.
NOTE: Each chemical has a MSDS provided by the manufacturer to

the user that lists the characteristics of the chemicals and other
information needed to use the chemicals safely.
For information on protective/preventive measures, see FM 8-10-7,

Health Service Support in a Nuclear Biological and Chemical
Environment; FM 8-10-17, Preventive Medicine Services; FM 8-500,
Hazardous Materials Injuries, FM 21-10, Field Hygiene and
Sanitation; and FM 21-10-1, Unit Field Sanitation Team.
• Environmental. Environmental hazards are present in the

environment (from either naturally occurring or man-made sources)
prior to the arrival of US forces. They include endemic insect- or
rodent-borne diseases, such as malaria or dengue fever; polluted air,
water, or soil from local industrial, agricultural, or mining operations;
and climatic and topographic hazards such as extreme heat, cold, or
altitude. Environmental hazards may also arise from these sources
during the time forces are deployed in an area and military personnel
must respond appropriately. For example, if an insect infestation is
found in the bivouac area, it may be necessary to use pesticides to
eliminate the infestation. Preventive medicine personnel executing
the pest management program would be required to apply the
appropriate amount of pesticide in safe manner to ensure that service
members are not inadvertently exposed to the pesticide. For
protective/preventive measures see FM 8-33, Control of
Communicable Disease Manual; FM 8-10-17, FM 8-10-18, Veterinary
Services - Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures; FM 21-10, and FM 21-
10-1.
• Directed (imposed). Imposed health hazards comprise those used by

an adversary against US Forces. These hazards include traditional
threats such as NBC warfare agents, as well as toxic industrial
materials that are released into the atmosphere by enemy forces,
terrorists, or belligerents to cause injury or death. For information on
protective/preventive measures see FM 8-9/NAVMED P-
5059/AFJMAN 44-151, NATO Handbook on the Medical Aspects of
NBC Defensive Operations, AMED P-6 (B); FM 8-284/NAVMED P-
5042/AFMAN (I) 44-156/MCRP 4-11.1C, Treatment of Biological
Warfare Agent Casualties; FM 8-285/NAVMED P-5041/AFJMAN 44-
149/FMFM 11-11, Treatment of Chemical Agent Casualties and
7-2
Conventional Military Chemical Injuries; FM 8-10-7, FM 8-10-17, FM

21-10, and FM 21-10-1.
RISK MANAGEMENT
7-6. Effective risk management always begins with the collection of baseline
information and threat reports. Using available data, commanders, with the
assistance of the surgeon, review and identify the hazards within the AO and
assess the risks from these hazards in accordance with risk management
guidance. The level of risk is based upon an assessment of the level or
severity of the hazard and the probability of occurrence. The effects of
available countermeasures upon the threat are incorporated into the
assessment. Command policies and directives establish acceptable risk
levels. For risk management guidance, see Chapter 2 of this manual and FM
100-14, Risk Management. For example, during Operation Desert Storm,
commanders had to determine what effect the emissions from the burning oil
wells had on the accomplishment of the mission and the risk posed to the
health of their soldiers. Limited health effect studies were conducted during
the Persian Gulf War with more extensive studies beginning in May 1991.
“The concentrations of VOCs (volatile organic compounds), PAHs

(polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons), metals, and criteria pollutants in the
Gulf region were much lower than initially presumed, considering the
magnitude of the fires. The measurements of the mean concentrations of
these pollutants are consistent across studies. The maximum
concentrations due to the oil well fire emissions measured in the Gulf
region are comparable to levels found in suburban locations in the US,
lower than those found in large urban centers in the US, and much lower
than the US-recommended occupational levels…Particulate matter,
however was found to be extremely high at all monitoring sites compared
with values in the US.”
Dalia M. Spektor
A Review of the Scientific Literature As It Pertains to Gulf War Illnesses,
Volume 6:Oil Well Fires
National Defense Research Institute
RAND 1998
CONTROL AND COUNTERMEASURES
7-7. Controls and countermeasures may include reconnaissance to

determine/confirm the quantity, quality, or confirmation of the hazard/threat;
employment avoidance techniques, providing protective materials/equipment
to personnel; providing decontamination capabilities for exposed personnel;
and publishing treatment protocols and provisioning medical treatment
personnel with appropriate medications, antidotes, and antitoxins
7-8. When deciding whether or not to employ controls/countermeasures, the

commander must consider the impact that these measures will have on the
health of personnel, the operation, and logistics support. The commander
must make risk acceptance decisions based upon the analyses.
7-3
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
Controls/countermeasures are then applied, based upon the commander’s

decisions.
7-9. Limitations and uncertainties impact on application of controls and

countermeasures. Leaders must consider operational requirements and
METT-TC trade-offs as part of applying controls and countermeasures
SURVEILLANCE
7-10. Medical surveillance is the routine, standardized tracking of disease

and injury rates, occupational and environmental exposures, and
countermeasure usage and effectiveness. Medical surveillance is incomplete
until these results are reported to commanders and decision-makers for use
in the overall command operational risk management effort. For specific
policy on medical surveillance, see DODD 6490.2 and DODI 6490.3.
7-11. Forward positioned medical units are limited in their medical

surveillance capabilities but can provide vital information, such as reporting
disease and non-battle injury (DNBI) cases. More robust medical elements
supporting in a reachback or technical chain manner perform more
sophisticated medical surveillance and analysis on the information provided.
At higher echelons, the medical capabilities and medical surveillance
capabilities also increase. See DODD 6490.2 and AR 40-5.
7-12. Regardless of the source of medical surveillance, important health

incidents or findings are recorded and reported. Within the operational area,
the command surgeon and preventive medicine staff advise the commander of
significant surveillance results. As the reports are transmitted to higher
headquarters, they are consolidated and reported to the next higher
headquarters. When the reports reach the repository agency (i.e., US Army
Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine for DNBI reports) they
are entered into the appropriate database. Statistical rates and reports are
then produced that are used to update assessments and policies and to
develop technical guides and doctrine for future operations. Commanders
and leaders should have access to this information to evaluate the health of
their force and to establish preventive/protective guidelines for countering
medical threats and maintaining the health of their command.
ADVICE TO THE COMMANDER ON ACCEPTANCE OF RISK
7-13. Medical personnel provide advice to the commander on possible

outcomes from acceptance of risk. The advice provides details on the level of
risk, protective/preventive measures, and the potential consequences when
these measures are not applied. For example, a unit moved into a field site to
conduct operations. Preventive medicine personnel conducted a survey of the
area and found that the soil in a small area was contaminated with a toxic
industrial chemical. The commander was advised to select an alternate
location for occupancy or only use areas of the site that were contamination
free by restricting access to hazardous areas. The commander opted to use
the recommended portion to establish operations but permitted one platoon to
setup their billeting immediately adjacent to the contaminated area. After a
few days, several personnel reported on sick call with severe skin irritation
7-4
from exposure to the toxic material; some personnel required hospitalization

for treatment. Had the commander enforced the recommended preventive
measures, these personnel would have been available for duty rather than
receiving treatment. Ultimately the commander’s decisions regarding the use
of medical advice will impact on the health of the force and on
accomplishment of the mission.
SUMMARY
7-14. To accomplish the mission of the US armed forces, it is essential that

military forces remain healthy and fit. Environmental and occupational
health hazards must be identified and measures taken to mitigate their
effects on the health of military personnel. Through command-sponsored
preventive medicine programs and continual surveillance of emerging
hazards, the commander can be better advised to more accurately assess the
risks to unit readiness.
7-5
Appendix A
Environmental Regulations, Laws, and Treaties

Environmental issues are a major concern for the Army and the Marine
Corps, and with emerging new laws and regulations, environmental
protection will continue to have a growing impact on Army and Marine
Corps operations. Violations of federal, state, or local environmental laws
can result in both civil and criminal penalties. Unit leaders must
understand the laws and respond accordingly. They must understand and
apply the respective Army or Marine Corps regulations, ensure that unit
personnel are properly trained and that all legal and regulatory guidance
and requirements (both military and civilian) are met.
This appendix provides a brief description of the primary Army and

Marine Corps environmental regulations and the principal environmental
laws applicable to military activities. Military facilities are subject to
federal, state, local and HN environmental laws; when the requirements
differ, the most stringent applies. Environmental laws affect almost every
military operation. Services do not expect commanders to be legal experts,
yet they must understand the requirements of environmental laws and
regulations. The installation’s environmental staff is the best source of
assistance to ensure unit compliance with environmental laws and
regulations. As discussed in Chapter 5 and in Appendix D, help is also
available to the subordinate unit commander by the higher headquarters’
staff, especially during an operation that takes the unit away from an
installation. Ignorance of environmental laws is not an excuse for
noncompliance, and it will not protect commanders, soldiers/Marines, or
the military services from civil and criminal liability.
These short synopses of laws and regulations provide only a brief sketch
and are not inclusive of all requirements.
SOURCES OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS
Federal, state, local, and host nation governments have established laws and
regulations to protect human health and natural and cultural resources from
environmental degradation. Heightened environmental awareness by the
public and the federal government has led agencies to develop policies to
support regulatory compliance and stewardship. The four primary sources of
environmental law that influence Army and Marine Corps actions are
federal, state, local, and host nation. The President also directs the federal
government through the use of EOs and the DOD complies with those
A-0
directives as it does with any other federal law. DOD/Army/Marine Corps

regulations, orders, and pamphlets, identified in this appendix, provide
additional guidance for commanders. The Army and Marine Corps will
comply with these laws and regulations as they pertain to individual
localities or installations, deployments, or operations.
Full compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations is a

necessary cost of doing business. To that end, the Army and Marine Corps
are committed to setting the standards for the DOD and other federal
agencies as the leaders in compliance with environmental laws, prevention of
environmental damage, and the protection and stewardship of natural
resources. In doing so, the Army and Marine Corps are making a concerted
effort to integrate environmental considerations into all Army and Marine
Corps activities.
At most locations, installation environmental support personnel are available

to help unit leaders understand the various laws and regulations. These
support personnel include the chain of command and key installation
personnel (DPW/environmental officer, SJA attorneys, range officers, and so
forth). Installation support personnel are addressed in more detail in
Chapter 5. Consult with installation environmental agencies on specific
requirements for each location. Given the state and local differences on
environmental laws, soldiers/Marines need to understand that what is
environmentally permissible on one installation may not be permissible on
another.
ARMY/MARINE CORPS REGULATIONS, ORDERS, AND PAMPHLETS
AR 200-1
AR 200-1 defines environmental program objectives and assigns management

responsibilities. This regulation lists duties and responsibilities for each level
of command from DA through the unit level. It also requires company,
battery, or troop commanders in the Army, Army NG, and Army RC to
appoint trained ECOs. AR 200-1 addresses the following major areas:
• Research and development.
• Water resources.
• Air pollution.
• HM/HW and solid waste.
• Noise.
• Environmental restoration.
• Asbestos.
• Radon reduction.
A-1
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
• Environmental training.
AR 200-2
AR 200-2 implements NEPA within the Army. This regulation sets forth
Army policies and responsibilities for the early integration of environmental
considerations into Army planning and decision-making. The NEPA process
described in this regulation applies to installations and units. This
regulation establishes criteria for determining if Army actions are covered
under categorical exclusion, or if an EA or EIS is required.
AR 200-3
AR 200-3 addresses land management and maintenance. This regulation

provides guidelines for installation staff members having land management
responsibilities (DPW, game management, range control, and the
environmental office). Land management regulation includes guidelines for
the following:
• Soil.
• Vegetation.
• Fish.
• Wildlife.
• Endangered species.
• Forests.
• Timber production.
• Agricultural leasing.
• Other land use purposes that are in the Army’s or public’s interest.
AR 200-4
AR 200-4 is the Army’s policy for managing cultural resources to meet legal
compliance requirements and support the military mission. It provides
guidance for the treatment of cultural resources, including prehistoric sites,
historic buildings and structures, traditional cultural properties, and Indian
sacred sites on Army-controlled properties.
This regulation replaces AR 420-40 and has been revised to update the
Army’s policy for managing cultural resources to meet legal compliance
requirements and to support the military mission. Cultural resources are:
historic properties as defined in the National Historic Preservation Act
(NHPA), cultural items as defined in the Native American Graves Protection
and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA); archaeological resources as defined in the
Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA), sacred sites as defined in
A-2
EO 13007 to which access is provided under the American Indian Religious

Freedom Act (AIRFA), and collections as defined in 36 Code of Federal
Regulation (CFR) 79 Curation of Federally Owned and Administered
Collections. Requirements set forth in NEPA, NHPA, ARPA, NAGPRA,
AIRFA, 36 CFR 79, EO 13007, and Presidential Memorandum on
Government to Government Relations with Native American Tribal
Governments define the basis of the Army’s compliance responsibilities for
managing cultural resources. Regulations applicable to the Army’s
management of cultural resources include those promulgated by the Advisory
Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) and the National Park Service
(NPS). It also requires that installations develop and integrate CRMP to
outline procedures for integrating cultural resources management
responsibilities and mission requirements.
AR 350-4
This regulation sets forth the objectives, responsibilities, and policies for the
ITAM Program. ITAM establishes procedures to achieve optimum,
sustainable use of training lands by implementing a uniform land
management program that includes inventorying and monitoring land
conditions, integrating training requirements with land carrying capacity,
educating land users to minimize adverse impacts, and providing for training
land rehabilitation and maintenance.
AR 420-49
This regulation rescinds AR 420-47. It specifies responsibilities, regulatory

requirements, and procedures for HW and solid waste management. The
current AR 200-1 incorporates most of these requirements. The solid waste
management policy and responsibilities that still apply address solid waste
collection procedures and operation of solid waste disposal facilities located
on installations.
AR 420-76
This regulation provides policies, standards, and procedures for pest control
activities on Army installations. It requires each installation's DPW to
prepare and annually update an IPMP. The IPMP lists all program
objectives in priority according to the potential or actual impact on health,
morale, structures, or property.
Generally, installations limit pest control to the least destructive means by

avoiding mass spraying, baiting, and poisoning where possible.
AR 420-76 will be replaced by AR 200-5, which is currently in draft format.

AR 200-5 will also incorporate the DOD’s 3 measures of merits (MOMs) for
pest management, as articulated in Department of Defense Instruction
(DODI) 4150.7.
A-3
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
DA PAM 200-1
This pamphlet is a companion to AR 200-2, designed to assist Army users in

the preparation and review of EAs and EISs that stem from NEPA.
DA PAM 200-4
This pamphlet is a companion to AR 200-4. It provides guidance for

implementing cultural resources management, and includes applicable
statutory and regulatory requirements for cultural resource and Native
American programs.
MCO P5090.2A
This regulation (currently dated July 1998) provides guidance and instruction
to Marine Corps forces to meet federal, state, and local environmental
legislative and regulatory requirements. It is focused on environmental
compliance and protection and identifies Marine Corps policy and
responsibilities. MCO P5090.2A addresses the following major areas:
• Program management.
• Environmental compliance and protection requirements.
• Environmental media areas.
• Education and training.
The regulation provides guidance to Marine Corps forces operating ashore

after disembarking. For guidance while afloat, see NWP 4-11 to incorporate
environmental considerations into naval doctrine and reference specific
Operational Naval Instruction (OPNAVINST) for guidance/regulations.
FEDERAL LAWS
These laws provide states and federal agencies a legal framework within
which to operate. These laws include acts and executive orders. For
example, the Federal Facilities Compliance Act (FFCA) allows regulatory
agencies to impose civil fines on other federal agencies, like the DA, for
violations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES PROTECTION ACT (ARPA) OF 1979
The ARPA stipulates that anyone excavating archaeological resources on

federal lands must have a permit or be subject to civil or criminal penalties.
Persons requesting an ARPA permit should be directed to the local US Army
Corps of Engineers (USACE), district engineer. Installation law enforcement
personnel should be aware of archaeological resources that need protection,
and such sites should be monitored regularly.
Unit leader actions include:
A-4
• Avoiding digging or conducting operations in or near cultural sites or

structures.
• Briefing soldiers/Marines on the importance of avoiding, protecting,

and safeguarding archaeological sites, to include not collecting any of
the artifacts.
• Reporting the discovery of any artifact and waiting for clearance to

resume training.
CLEAN AIR ACT (CAA) OF 1970
The CAA, with amendments, requires the prevention, control, and abatement
of air pollution from stationary sources (power plants) and mobile sources
(vehicles). It controls the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from fuel
storage and dispensing, spray painting, and solvent use. Additional impacts
include open burning, smoke obscurant generation, incineration of waste, and
fugitive emissions.
The CAA implementing regulations concerning emission requirements do not

apply to tactical vehicles. However, increasingly, stringent requirements for
civilian vehicles do apply to other military vehicles. The CAA also controls
open burning operations that result in nitrogen oxide (NOX). The inherent
CAA requirement to control air pollutants and fugitive dust effects military
activities. The CAA also regulates asbestos removal and disposal. Recent
amendments include provisions for control of air toxins (hazardous air
pollutants), acid rain, and ozone depleting compounds, such as CFC.
• Advising the chain of command of air pollution sources.
• Identifying and reducing sources of air pollution (dust control in

training areas, excessive emissions from poorly maintained vehicles,
parts washer emissions, and so forth).
• Using riot control and smoke agents only in approved training areas.
CLEAN WATER ACT (CWA) OF 1972
The CWA, amended in 1977, regulates point source discharges into US

waters. This law applies most often to industrial facilities, sewage treatment
facilities, and ships. Requirements for oil and HM spill reporting and
waterways clean up affect military operations, including river crossings and
amphibious actions. The CWA requires spill prevention plans for sites that
store significant quantities of petroleum products.
The CWA also regulates storm water runoff from certain industrial sources
and requires permits for activities that affect wetlands. There is also an
inherent requirement to prevent soil erosion during construction and earth
moving activities. Units must ensure that ground disturbed during tactical
operations and training is preserved from future soil erosion.
A-5
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
• Knowing the locations of surface water and groundwater in the

training areas or areas of operations.
• Planning and conducting training, operations, and logistics activities

to avoid surface and groundwater areas where possible.
• Crossing streams and ditches only at designated vehicle crossing

locations.
• Ensuring soldiers use designated vehicle wash areas and do not

perform maintenance or refuel vehicles or equipment where a spill
can easily contaminate surface water or groundwater.
• Ensuring released or spilled vehicle fluids do not contaminate surface

water or groundwater. Taking immediate corrective action should oil
or hazardous substance spills occur.
• Reporting all spills/releases as stated in the ISCP.
• Using proper preventive medicine and sanitation procedures to

prevent surface water and groundwater contamination.
• Disposing of liquid waste from kitchens, showers, and baths properly.
• Avoiding entering terrain drainage areas with vehicles unless the

area is dry and the ground will support such activities.
• Ensuring soldiers/Marines do not pour chemicals into sinks or storm

drains.
For wetland and coastal water areas unit leader actions include:
• Requesting a map of designated wetlands and coastal water areas

from the environmental office or range control.
• Ensuring soldiers/Marines are aware of wetland and coastal water

areas and the restrictions for each area.

without contaminating or causing unnecessary damage.
• Ensuring soldiers/Marines use designated vehicle wash areas and do

not perform maintenance or refuel vehicles/equipment in these areas.
• Crossing streams and ditches only at designated vehicle crossings.
• Ensuring permits are obtained before any operations resulting in

dredging or filling of wetlands.
A-6
For erosion control and its associated considerations, unit leader actions include:
• Verifying restrictions with range control.
• Briefing soldiers/Marines on environmental and safety considerations

before field training.
• Planning missions to reduce the possibility of erosion. Prohibiting the

use of live vegetation unless permitted; driving or parking vehicles
close to trees; and cutting trees without permission from range
control or the installation forester.
• Avoiding compaction of soil to the point that water can no longer

percolate through it.
• Avoiding tactical maneuvers in erosion-susceptible areas, and

refilling all fighting positions.
• Reducing maneuvers during periods of high rainfalls and saturated

soil conditions.
• Making maximum use of existing roads and trails.
COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION, AND LIABILITY ACT (CERCLA)

OF 1980
The CERCLA, known as Superfund since its enactment in 1980, regulates

past releases of HM into the environment. This act establishes personal
liability of the individual responsible for the release. The Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) amended the CERCLA in
1986. Together, these laws establish the "superfund" program to clean up
HW sites. The corresponding DOD program is the IRP. The IRP helps
identify, investigate, and clean up contamination on DOD property.
• Reporting any suspected contamination site to the chain of command.
• Ensuring soldiers/Marines understand the environmental ethic and

apply it to avoid any future liabilities.
• Disposing properly of all HM/HW.
EMERGENCY PLANNING AND COMMUNITY RIGHT TO KNOW ACT (EPCRA) OF 1986
The EPCRA provides a mechanism for informing local populations about

possible chemical hazards in the community. Also known as SARA Title III,
the EPCRA originally applied only to industry. EO 12856 now extends the
EPCRA to federal facilities, including DOD. EPCRA requires military
installations to plan for effective emergency procedures in the event of a spill
or other uncontrolled release of HMs.
A-7
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
The EPCRA also requires local governments to prepare for the emergency
release of HM by appointing a local emergency planning committee (LEPC).
Facilities with HM operations submit nonclassified inventories to the LEPC
and immediately notify the LEPC when any release of HM occurs in
quantities greater than permissible levels. Installations prepare annual
reports of HM released through accident and normal operations.
Unit leader actions with regard to EPCRA include:
• Training soldiers/Marines on spill prevention planning, reporting,

and cleanup IAW the ISCP.
• Maintaining a current HM inventory and an MSDS for every HM in

the unit. Providing a copy of the HM inventory to the fire department
or installation EMO.
• Complying with the ISCP.
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT (ESA) OF 1973
This act, as amended, protects threatened or endangered plants and animals

(to include fish, insects, and invertebrates). All federal agencies ensure their
actions do not jeopardize threatened or endangered species or their habitats.
The Secretary of the Interior publishes lists of endangered and threatened
species in the Federal Register.
The ESA prohibits anyone from “taking”, harassing or harming, a listed fish
and wildlife species unless permitted by the ESA. Additionally, the ESA
makes it unlawful to remove or to maliciously damage or destroy listed plants
in areas under federal jurisdiction.
The ESA prohibits the destruction, capture, trading, selling, or buying of

listed species. The DOD consults with the National Marine Fisheries and the
USFWS before taking any action that may effect, adversely or beneficially, a
listed species or designated critical habitat.
• Enforcing range control and installation environmental regulations.
• Avoiding actions that could harm protected plants and animals and
their habitats on the installation and any off-post training areas.
• Recognizing threatened and endangered species’ habitat and avoiding

it during training, operations, and logistics activities.
• Marking environmentally sensitive areas as restricted movement

areas during field training.
• Consulting the environmental office for other local requirements

relating to wildlife and natural vegetation.
A-8
• Avoiding cutting brush and trees for camouflage.
• Coordinating with Preventive Medicine.
• Avoiding damage to marked wildlife food plots and watering areas.
• Complying with the installation endangered species management

plan.
FEDERAL FACILITIES COMPLIANCE ACT (FFCA) OF 1992
The FFCA applies only to HW and solid waste requirements of the RCRA.
This act represents, however, a growing consensus that federal facilities
should comply with environmental laws in the same manner as private,
nongovernmental civilian agencies.
Originally passed in 1992, the FFCA subjects DOD employees at all levels to
personal criminal liability for environmental violations of any federal or state
solid waste or HW law. Criminal sanctions under the federal HW law
(RCRA) include a maximum fine of up to $250,000, a jail sentence of up to 15
years, or both. The FFCA also allows regulatory agencies to issue NOVs, and
impose civil fines and administrative action for solid waste and HW
violations.
• Cooperating with environmental inspectors.
• Performing assessments of the work areas of soldiers/Marines to

ensure compliance with environmental guidelines.
• Informing the chain of command when environmental problems are

discovered.
FEDERAL INSECTICIDE FUNGICIDE, AND RODENTICIDE ACT (FIFRA) OF 1972
The FIFRA requires licensing or registering pesticide products by the US

EPA. It also requires proper management of pesticide use, storage, and
disposal. Only certified personnel, or someone under the direct supervision of
a certified person, may use restricted use pesticides. IPM is the Army's
comprehensive approach to the prevention, elimination, and control of pests.
The IPM concept addresses pest problems in various ways and considers all
options for pest removal/control.
• Ensuring field sanitation teams are properly trained in the use of HM

in the field sanitation kit (i.e., pesticides, rodenticides, insecticides
[insect repellent], and fungicides [foot powder]).
• Employing procedures IAW FM 21-10 and FM 21-10-1.
A-9
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
• Notifying the installation DPW or G4 (Marines) concerning pest

control in unit billets and dining facilities.
FEDERAL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION LAW (FEDERAL HAZMAT LAW) OF 1988
Formerly known as the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act (HMTA),

this law authorizes the US DOT to issue interstate and intrastate regulations
related to transportation of HM. DOT oversight applies to; packing and
repacking; handling; labeling, marking, and placarding; routing.
In addition, the HMTA establishes record keeping requirements and a

registration program for shippers, carriers, and container manufacturers.
Units most commonly haul HM in the form of POL products and ordnance.
Units comply with these requirements during operations and deployments
that require vehicle movement or convoys on federal and state highways.
• Training soldiers/Marines on proper transportation procedures to

include vehicle placarding, material packaging, vehicle loading,
operator requirements, safety precautions, and spill procedures.
• Ensuring accountability for all HM.
• Applying the risk management process to each unit movement

requirement.
MARINE MAMMAL PROTECTION ACT (MMPA) OF 1972
The MMPA provides protection for marine mammals. The MMPA also
prohibits hunting or harvesting these animals except by permit. As defined
by the MMPA, marine mammals include the following:
• Whales.
• Dolphins (porpoises).
• Sea otters.
• Polar bears.
• Any mammal morphologically adapted to the marine environment.
• Ensuring soldiers/Marines understand they are not to harass,

capture, or injure marine mammals.
• Planning operations to avoid sensitive marine mammal habitats.
• Reporting suspected violations through the chain of command.
A-10
MILITARY MUNITIONS RULE OF 1997
This rule amends RCRA and identifies when conventional and chemical
munitions become HW under the RCRA. It is a minimum federal standard
for management of waste military munitions and provides new procedures for
the storage, transport, and disposal of such waste. The DOD, other federal
agencies, and government contractors who produce or use military munitions
for the DOD are affected by this rule. States may adopt military munitions
requirements more stringent than the federal rules.
Unused munitions become waste when abandoned (i.e., buried, landfill,

dumped at sea, etc.); detonated (except as a consequence of intended use);
burned, incinerated, or treated before disposal; removed from storage for
treatment/disposal; deteriorated or damaged beyond repair; recycled, or
reused; or declared a waste by an authorized military official.
Military munitions are not waste when used for their intended purpose, such
as for training or part of research, development, testing, and evaluation
activities, or during range clearance activities on active and inactive ranges.
This rule excludes unused munitions that are repaired, reused, recycled,
reclaimed, disassembled, reconfigured, or otherwise subject to materials
recovery activities. Assignment of a particular condition code or placement in
one of DOD’s demilitarization accounts is not dispositive of whether an item
is a waste because many of these materials are subjected to recovery, reuse,
and recycling activities. (See the actions associated with the Federal
Hazardous Materials Transportation Law of 1998.)
• Training soldiers/Marines on proper procedures for the

transportation, storage, handling, and turn-in of military munitions.
• Ensuring accountability for all munitions.
• Reporting all problems with damaged or malfunctioning munitions

through the chain of command and the issuing/turn-in facility.
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) OF 1969
The NEPA affects virtually every proposed action on military installations.

Installations pay particular attention to actions that may present a danger to
the health, safety, or welfare of civilian and military personnel, or may cause
irreparable harm to animal or plant life. The NEPA requires federal agencies
to consider the environmental impacts of their actions during planning and
decision making.
Installations document these considerations, while ensuring public

involvement in the planning process. Only those actions categorically
excluded from NEPA documentation requirements are exempt. (See Chapter
4 and AR 200-2 for a list of categorical exclusions.) EO 12114 extends the
application of the NEPA philosophy to major federal actions in foreign
nations.
A-11
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
• Identifying areas of environmental concern.
• Identifying mission-related environmental risks.
• Identifying potential effects of environmental factors on missions and

operations.
• Discussing environmental risk in training meetings and briefings.
• Identifying alternative training scenarios and techniques.
• Consulting installation environmental office personnel regarding

requirements for NEPA documentation.
NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT (NHPA) OF 1966
The NHPA requires federal agencies to consider the effects of their actions,
such as construction, leasing, land transactions, and base realignment and
closure (BRAC), on cultural and historic resources. The act seeks to
safeguard against the loss of irreplaceable historic properties, especially those
located on federal land. Many Army and Marine Corps facilities are located
on historic and archaeological sites, to include prehistoric settlements and
19th century cantonments.
• Identifying and recognizing possible archaeological and historical

artifacts, sites, and structures.

to avoid damage to archaeological or historic artifacts, sites, or
structures.
• Instructing soldiers/Marines to leave historic artifacts in place and

report newly discovered items to the chain-of-command.
• Reporting vandalism, theft, or damage to historic, cultural, or

archaeological sites.
NATIVE AMERICAN GRAVES REPARATION ACT (NAGPRA) OF 1990
The intent of this act is to ensure the protection and rightful disposition of
Native American cultural items, including human remains, from federal
lands. It establishes a consultation process for the intentional excavation or
inadvertent discovery of NAGPRA cultural items. Soldiers and Marines must
immediately report the discovery of Native American remains and artifacts.
A-12
• Identifying and recognizing possible Native American historic

artifacts, sites, and remains.

to avoid damage to Native American historic artifacts, sites, or
remains.
• Instructing soldiers/Marines to leave Native American historic

artifacts, sites, or remains in place and report newly discovered items
to the chain-of-command.
• Reporting vandalism, theft, or damage to Native American artifacts,

sites, or remains.
NOISE CONTROL ACT (NCA) OF 1972
The NCA establishes a national policy to promote an environment free from

noise that jeopardizes the public's health and welfare. It also regulates noise
emissions from commercial equipment, such as transportation and
construction equipment. The NCA exempts noise from military weapons or
combat equipment. However, the goal of the Army's environmental noise
abatement program is to achieve compliance with applicable noise
regulations in a manner consistent with mission accomplishment.
• Complying with local and installation noise restrictions.
• Maintaining equipment to perform to maintenance specifications.
• Checking with range control to confirm installation compatible use

zone (ICUZ) program requirements.
OIL POLLUTION ACT (OPA) OF 1990
The OPA is far more comprehensive and stringent than any previous US or
international oil pollution liability and prevention law. It is divided into nine
titles focused on oil spills by vessels and facilities. It is principally a response
to events like the grounding of the Exxon Valdez and several subsequent
accidents in 1989/1990. It establishes a standard for measuring natural
resource damage applicable to all actions for such damage.
Additionally, it emphasizes federal direction of public and private efforts both

of the response to avert the threat of an oil spill and of removal of oil that has
been spilled. The act specifies federal preeminence in undertaking and
directing response actions but preserves state authority over significant
aspects of removal activities.
A-13
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
• Training unit spill prevention/response teams.
• Reporting all known or suspected spills through the chain of

command and IAW your unit SOP.
• Complying with the ISCP.
• Applying the risk management process to each operation to reduce

the probability and severity of potential spills.
QUIET COMMUNITIES ACT OF (QCA) 1978
The QCA amended the NCA to allow local communities to develop ordinances
controlling unnecessarily loud noises. To minimize contention between
installations and surrounding communities, the DOD established the
installation compatible use zone (ICUZ) program. Following are the
program’s objectives:
• Assessing environmental impacts of the noise produced by proposed

actions and both on-post and off-post noise sources.
• Complying with federal regulations.
• Ensuring installation mission compatibility with local land use.
• Minimizing environmental noise impact through engineering,

operational controls, siting, and architecture.
• Protecting the health and welfare of all individuals adjacent to

installations.
• Complying with local and installation noise restrictions.
• Maintaining equipment to perform to maintenance specifications.
• Confirming installation compatible use zone (ICUZ) program

requirements with range control.
RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT (RCRA) OF 1976
The RCRA (originally the Solid Waste Disposal Act), with amendments,
establishes guidelines and standards for HW generation, transportation,
treatment, storage, and disposal. All states require RCRA operating permits
for HW treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (TSDF). The RCRA also
covers the laws surrounding the disposal of solid waste to include solid waste
management, landfill regulation, recycling, and affirmative procurement.
A-14
RCRA regulations require training for soldiers and Marines handling or

managing HM. It also requires management of underground storage tanks
(USTs) and clean up of hydrocarbon contamination.
• Complying with the installation HW management plan.
• Supporting the installation recycling program (ensuring soldiers/

Marines understand its importance).
• Removing expended brass, communications wire, concertina, and trip

wires from waste (see the Military Munitions Rule).
• Conducting police calls to collect and dispose of solid waste (trash).
• Disposing of kitchen waste only as authorized; prohibiting garbage

burning/burying.
• Ensuring the unit SOP covers HW and HM, including spill

contingencies.
• Collecting and turn-in HW/HM according to local and installation

procedures, both in garrison and in the field.
• Properly cleaning up, reporting, and documenting any hazardous

spills.
• Transporting HW according to local and installation procedures.
• Conducting maintenance, and allowing the use of HM only after

soldiers/Marines have been properly trained.
• Ensuring the unit ECO is properly trained and that the training is
documented.
• Maintaining a current HM inventory and an MSDS for every HM in

the unit. Providing a copy of the HM inventory to the fire department
or installation EMO.
SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT (SDWA) OF 1974
The SDWA regulates drinking water quality. It bases assessments of water

quality on levels of pollutants present in the water. Water supply facility
managers analyze treated water regularly. If the water quality is below
standards, water supply providers notify their customers. The Army's
program objectives are to conserve water resources by implementing
conservation plans and to provide drinking water that meets regulatory
standards.
A-15
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
• Enforcing the installation water conservation plan.
• Briefing soldiers/Marines on the impact of polluting water sources.
• Employing pollution prevention practices.
• Reporting all concerns about water quality through the chain of

command.
SIKES ACT (SA) OF 1985
The SA, as amended in November 1989, allows each military department to

provide services for fish and wildlife management. The military also
prioritizes work with federal and state fish and wildlife conservation
agencies. An installation’s fish and wildlife management program operates
under a cooperative plan mutually agreed to by the installation commander,
the regional office of the USFWS, and the state agency designated by the host
state.
• Enforcing range control and installation environmental regulations.
• Avoiding actions that could harm protected animals and their habitat
on the installation and any off-post training areas.
• Recognizing threatened and endangered species’ habitat and avoiding

it during training, operations, and logistics activities.
• Marking environmentally sensitive areas as restricted movement

areas during field training.
• Consulting with the environmental office for other local requirements

relating to fish and wildlife.
• Avoiding damage to marked wildlife food plots and watering areas.
• Complying with the installation endangered species management

plan.
TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT (TSCA) OF 1976
The TSCA places restrictions on certain chemical substances. These

restrictions seek to limit human and environmental exposure to highly toxic
substances, including CFCs, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and asbestos.
TSCA requires chemical testing of substances entering the environment. It
also regulates the release of these chemicals.
A-16
• Reporting any suspected asbestos containing material or PCBs to the

installation EMO.
• Training all soldiers/Marines (mechanics) that perform maintenance

on any air conditioning system on proper procedures for the use,
recovery, recycling, or disposal of refrigerants.
EXECUTIVE ORDERS
EO 11987
Dated 24 May 1977, this order directs all federal agencies to prevent the
introduction of exotic species (all plants and animals not occurring, either
presently or historically, in any ecosystem of the US) into the natural
ecosystems of the US. (“US” means all of the fifty states, the District of
Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, American Samoa, the Virgin
Islands, Guam, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands.) This order is
of special importance when addressing redeployments to the US from areas
outside the US.
EO 11988
Dated 24 May 1977, this order (Floodplain Management) addresses the

actions federal agencies must take to identify and protect floodplains.
Additionally, it directs agencies to take into consideration the effects of
actions in a floodplain. The intent is to seek to preserve and enhance the
natural value of floodplains. This intent includes minimizing the risk of
losses from flooding.
EO 11990
Dated 24 May 1977, this order (Protection of Wetlands) addresses the actions
federal agencies must take to identify and protect wetlands. Additionally, it
directs agencies to take into consideration the effects of actions in wetlands.
The intent is to preserve and enhance the natural values of wetlands and to
minimize the risk of wetland destruction.
EO 12088
Dated 13 October 1978, this order (Federal Compliance with Pollution

Control Standards) links federal environmental regulations and federal
facilities. It directs all federal facilities to control and monitor environmental
pollution in compliance with federal environmental regulations.
This order also established the A-106 (1383) reporting process, now referred
to as environmental program requirements. In November 1988, the EPA
issued the Federal Facilities Compliance Strategy, also known as the EPA
Yellow Book, which establishes a comprehensive and proactive approach by
which federal facilities may comply with federal regulations.
A-17
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
EO 12114
Dated 4 January 1979, this order (Environmental Effects Abroad of Major

Federal Actions) addresses environmental effects of major federal actions
abroad. It establishes procedures for federal agencies in foreign countries
and global communities to consider the effects of their actions on the
environment. The Department of State supervises and coordinates these
efforts overseas. The objective of this program is to provide information to
decision-makers, increase awareness and interest in environmental concerns,
and encourage environmental cooperation with foreign nations.
EO 12580
Signed on 23 January 1987, this order (Superfund Implementation) amended

EO 12088, which delegates CERCLA duties and powers (as amended by the
SARA). It provides for a National Contingency Plan (NCP) to provide
national and regional response teams to plan and coordinate HM/HW
preparedness and response actions. The response teams may include
representatives from state and local governments.
EO 12856
Dated 6 August 1993, this order (Federal Compliance With Right-To-Know

Laws and Pollution Prevention Requirements) challenges the federal
government to publicly lead by example by applying source reduction in the
management of its facilities and in its acquisition practices. It commits
federal agencies to publicly report toxic wastes and emissions and to reduce
toxic releases by at least fifty percent by 1999. By preventing pollution, the
federal government not only protects the environment, but it also saves the
taxpayers money by reducing waste management costs and long-term
liability for expensive clean up. This order requires that all federal facilities
comply with the provisions of the EPCRA, which previously applied only to
industry.
EO 12898
Dated 11 February 1994, this order (Federal Actions to Address

Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low Income Populations)
directs each federal agency to conduct its programs, policies, and activities
that substantially effect human health or environment in an appropriate
manner. This manner ensures that such programs, policies, and activities do
not exclude persons (including populations) from participating, denying
persons (including populations) the benefits of, or subjecting persons
(including populations) to discrimination under such programs, policies, and
activities because of their race, color, or national origin.
EO 13007
Dated 24 May 1996, this order (Indian Sacred Sites), provides direction to
federal agencies on managing Native American sacred sites. It requires that
federal agencies allow Native Americans reasonable access to lands that
contain sacred sites. Further, federal agencies must avoid adversely effecting
A-18
the “physical integrity” of sacred sites and ensure reasonable notice is

provided to Indian tribes when land management policies may restrict future
access or adversely effect sacred sites.
EO 13101
Dated 14 September 1998, this order (Greening the Government Through

Waste Prevention, Recycling, and Federal Acquisition) replaces EO 12995
and EO 12873. It requires federal agencies to incorporate waste prevention
and recycling into their daily operations and implement cost effective
procurement preference programs for recycled and environmentally
preferable products and services. It is the national policy to prefer pollution
prevention, whenever feasible. Pollution that cannot be prevented should be
recycled; pollution that cannot be prevented or recycled should be treated in
an environmentally safe manner. Disposal should be employed only as a last
resort. Federal agencies shall comply with executive branch policies for the
acquisition and use of environmentally preferable products and services and
implement cost-effective procurement preference programs favoring the
purchase of these products and services.
OTHER EO INFORMATION
For information on other environmentally related EOs, or the exact text of a

particular EO, you may want to refer to the web site address at
http://www.denix.osd.mil/denix/Public/Legislation/EO/toc.html or the web site
at http://128.174.5.51/.
STATE LAWS
Each state has its own regulatory organization charged with developing and
implementing environmental regulations. Many of the state regulations
parallel federal environmental regulations and are often more stringent.
LOCAL LAWS
Local laws and ordinances address the concerns of the local communities.
Generally, they are based on federal and state laws. However, each
municipality or community may place more stringent restrictions on certain
activities (noise restrictions during certain hours of the day).
HOST NATION LAW/FINAL GOVERNING STANDARDS
The Army and Marine Corps are committed to actively addressing

environmental quality issues in relations with neighboring communities and
assuring that consideration of the environment is an integral part of all
decisions. Installations and units OCONUS that are not subject to federal
environmental regulations promulgated by EPA will, in areas where a HN
has minimal or no environmental laws and regulations, comply with AR 200-
1 and 200-2. In countries where there are HN laws, the FGS will be used
according to the executive agent of that country.
A-19
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
INTERNATIONAL LAWS AND TREATIES
• Biological Diversity Convention.
• International Tropical Timber Agreement.
• International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships.
• Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species.
• Basel Convention (HW).
• NOX Protocol (air pollution).
• London Dumping Convention (marine pollution from ships dumping

wastes generated on land).
• Montreal Protocol (ozone depleting substances).
• Kyoto Accord (greenhouse gases).
US armed forces are obligated to abide by the provisions of treaties and

conventions to which the US is bound. These treaties can impact military
operations in several ways. The Basel Convention on the Control of
Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal, for
example, could limit HW disposal options available to a deployed force. While
this treaty has not been ratified by the Senate at this time, the US is still a
signatory to it. Whether bound by a treaty or not, its mere existence may
affect operations. Recent examples from Bosnia-Herzegovina have confirmed
this situation. See CALL Newsletter 99-9 for more information on this recent
example.
Another body of laws that effect US military forces are international treaties
that govern armed conflict, known collectively as Environmental Laws of War
(ELOW). One such treaty is the Convention on the Prohibition of Military or
any Other Hostile Use of ENMOD. This treaty prohibits any military use of
ENMOD, any technique for changing, through the deliberate manipulation of
natural processes, the dynamics, composition, or structure of the
environment. The terms in the ENMOD Convention are broadly defined and
subject to interpretation by each nation.
The 1977 Protocol I addition to the 1949 Geneva Convention also places
restrictions on environmental warfare—using terms similar to those in the
ENMOD Convention. This convention requires combatants to “...protect the
natural environment against widespread, long-term, and severe damage”
during war. This protection includes a prohibition of the use of methods or
means of warfare that could cause extensive damage to the natural
environment and endanger the health or survival of the population. This
convention also prohibits attacks against the natural environment as a means
of reprisal. Although the United States has not ratified all of the provisions
of Protocol I, the provisions, as applied by other nations, may still affect
A-20
operations. Commanders must consult the SJA for specific advice on

international laws or conventions.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE ENFORCEMENT
Under the FFCA, federal and state environmental regulatory agencies can
impose civil fines on federal agencies, including the Army and Marine Corps,
for RCRA violations. For the Army and Marine Corps, penalties can be fines,
damage awards, and intervention from the EPA and other federal, state, and
regional agencies. An additional consequence is an increase in monitoring by
these agencies.
Unit leaders and their subordinates are required to comply with all federal,
state, and local laws designed to protect the environment. Violators can be
held personally liable for clean up costs and civil or criminal penalties.
Violators include the actual person who causes contamination and the
commanders, supervisors, and leaders who allowed the contamination to
occur and did not take immediate action to prevent or correct the occurrence.
The penalty can be up to $50,000 for each day of violation and/or up to two
years in jail.
A-21
Appendix B
Environmental Appendix to the Engineer Annex

The following annex format lists typical environmental considerations for
OPLAN, CONPLAN, OPORD and execution. For small units (battalions
and companies), the format will provide a guide for finding necessary
information for developing their own orders. For larger units (brigade
and divisional), the format should provide an example for developing a
similar appendix. This format conforms to FM 101-5 and is an example of
Appendix 2 (Environmental Considerations) to Annex F (Engineer). FM
101-5 directs that OPLANs/OPORDs/CONPLANs will contain an
appendix to address environmental considerations. Each service uses its
own format for similar appendixes/annexes. Annex L (Environmental
Considerations) to a JOPES OPLAN/OPORD/CONPLAN is the parallel
document for a joint staff.
The considerations and level of detail in this format are appropriate for
corps, divisions, and, on some occasions, regiments/brigades. Unit
planning at the regiment or brigade level and below will normally include
only those elements required by the higher HQ order or plan and not
included in a unit SOP.
Unit orders and plans follow individual service formatting conventions.

Army orders normally include environmental considerations in the
coordinating instructions (paragraph 3, Execution) if not in a separate
appendix. When specific command procedures dictate, staff officers
include some environmental considerations in logistics and medical
annexes.
All operations comply with federal law to the extent possible. This
example assumes an overseas deployment in which the vast majority of
federal environmental law is not applicable. Plans for training or
operations in the US must conform to federal and state laws.
Tab A of this example appendix implements the requirement of EO 12114

to conduct environmental assessments before taking actions that
significantly harm the environment of a foreign nation or the global
commons. It is applicable during certain support operations and stability
operations. Actions taken during combat are excluded. DODD 6050.7,
which implements EO 12114, defines the EIS, ES, and ER directed in this
tab.
B-0
CLASSIFICATION
Copy ___ of ___ copies

Issuing Headquarters
Place of Issue
Date-Time Group of Signature
Message Reference Number
APPENDIX 2 (ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS) TO ANNEX F (ENGINEER) TO 54th

MECH DIV OPLAN 99-7 (U)
References:
a. JP 3-34, “Engineer Doctrine for Joint Operations,” November 1997.
b. JP 4-04, “Joint Doctrine for Civil Engineer Support,” 26 September 1995.
c. JSI 3820.01A, “Environmental Engineering Effects of DODA,” 16 January 1996.
d. DODI 4715.5, “Management of Environmental Compliance at Overseas Installations,” 22

April 1996.
e. DODI 4715.8, “Environmental Remediation Policy for DOD Activities Overseas.”
f. Applicable country-specific FGS.
g. DOD OEBGD, or in-theater equivalent, October 1992.
h. HN agreements, local operating standards if different from FGS, command special

instructions, SOPs, policies, guidance for environmental considerations, or references pertaining
to significant environmental factors in the AO.
i. Unit SOPs.
Time Zone Used Throughout the Order:
1. SITUATION.
a. Enemy forces. Refer to an OPORD or to an environmental annex/appendix to an
OPORD. State any environmental factors or conditions which could adversely affect the
successful completion of the mission, and/or the health or welfare of friendly forces and the
indigenous population. Environmental threats can be natural, collateral, accidental, or caused by
actions of the population or enemy forces. (This operation depends upon our ability to provide
water for both our forces and the indigenous population through desalinization plants drawing
water from the Gulf…the enemy has large amounts of chemical munitions. Special care must be
taken when destroying enemy munition dumps to ensure chemical munitions are not being
detonated…due to the extremely high water table in the area, special care and considerations
must be taken in the siting of landfills and the collection of all waste products…)
CLASSIFICATION
Figure B-1. Appendix 2 (Environmental Considerations) to Annex F (Engineer)
B-1
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
CLASSIFICATION
(1) Terrain. List all critical terrain aspects that impact functional areas operations.
(2) Weather. List all critical weather aspects that impact functional areas operations.
(3) Enemy functional area capability and/or activity:
(a) List known and templated significant environmental hazards. If the

information is large and specific enough, this list may become an overlay.
(b) List significant enemy capabilities to use environmental manipulation as a

means to impede friendly forces or jeopardize long-term objectives. (Enemy may release oil
directly into the Gulf…Enemy may set oil wells afire to cover their retreat…)
(c) State the expected employment of enemy functional area assets based on
the most probable course of action. (Enemy will not be effected by international opinion…they will
use all means at their disposal to include releasing oil directly into the gulf and setting oil wells
afire in an orgy of destruction…)
(4) Limiting factors. Outline limitations that are due to lack of foreign access, time,
operations security (OPSEC), HN rules or sensitivities, public affairs (foreign and domestic), legal
th
considerations, and resources. (Operations by 54 MECH DIV will inherently have an
environmental impact. Environmental considerations require early integration in the planning
process and will be accomplished in conjunction with other planning and the risk management
process. The environmental protection level will vary as levels of risk are anticipated to be lower
and the correspondingly environmental efforts more comprehensive in proportion to the distance
from the combat zone [CZ]. This appendix does not address munitions storage/disposal,
chemical, biological, and radiological [CBR] activities, or activities on naval ships at sea.)
b. Friendly forces. Refer to an OPORD or to an annex to an OPORD. State the concept of

environmental operations for the higher headquarters. This concept covers relationships between
environmental considerations and the supported OPORD, OPLAN, CONPLAN, or support plan.
c. Attachments and detachments. Refer to an OPORD or an annex to an OPORD (Annex L
if it is a JOPES OPORD). Identify special environmental teams or personnel.
2. MISSION. State the commander’s concept for environmental actions. This concept answers
the who, what, when where, how, and why of the relationship between environmental
considerations and the supported OPORD, OPLAN, CONPLAN, or functional plan. Normally, the
mission will be to protect, as much as practicable, the health and welfare of US personnel and the
indigenous population from environmental threats during the conduct of the operation; to reduce
long-term, adverse impact on the economy and public health; and to reduce US costs and
liabilities at the completion of the operation.
CLASSIFICATION
Figure B-1. Appendix 2 (Environmental Considerations) to Annex F (Engineer) (continued)
B-2
CLASSIFICATION
3. EXECUTION.
a. Scheme of Environmental Operations. Summarize the commander’s concept of environmental

actions required to support the OPLAN, OPORD, or CONPLAN. Identify issues and actions that
should be addressed during all phases of the operation. Identify the desired environmental endstate.
(1) Operational effect on the environment. List critical resources that should be protected
during the operation such as forests, croplands, or water- and sewage-treatment facilities. Describe
factors to be considered by subordinate unit commanders when making collateral damage decisions.
(2) Environmental resource effect on the operation. List any environmental conditions or
factors that could impede successful completion of the operational mission or jeopardize the desired
endstate. Identify possible targets of environmental sabotage or terrorism.
(3) Compliance requirements. State regulatory, legal, and HN compliance requirements that
will apply and under what conditions they may be applicable (combat versus nonhostile, stability
operation or support operation; geographical differences; or event-triggered changes).
(4) Phased compliance. Describe in general terms the major environmental concerns and
requirements during different phases of the operation. Specify transition tasks and measures and the
appropriate initiating control measures.
b. Tasks to subordinate units. It will be unusual to have an entry here. If it is important enough
to task a given maneuver element to accomplish an environmental task, this tasking must be
identified in paragraph 3b of the base order. An example is the tasking of specific units (in
conjunction with the surgeon or chemical officer) to perform environmental reconnaissance missions.
If only placed here it is likely to be overlooked by the tasked unit. If including tasks to subordinate
units:
(1) List functional area tasks that specific maneuver elements must accomplish and that the
base OPORD does not contain.
(2) List functional area tasks the functional area units supporting maneuver elements must
accomplish only as necessary to ensure unity of effort.
c. Coordinating Instructions. Outline key coordination that must be accomplished by two our
more units and not routinely covered in unit SOPs. Pay particular attention to coordination
requirements with higher HQs, Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), and other federal agencies.
Unit responsibilities and requirements may vary according to location, activity, or phase of the
operation; attach a matrix that specifies various levels of environmental protection. Environmental
responsibilities of the surgeon and the logistics officer may be included here if not incorporated in
their respective annexes.
CLASSIFICATION
B-3
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
CLASSIFICATION
(1) Environmental reconnaissance. Identify general responsibilities here.
(2) Environmental vulnerabilities. Specify general responsibilities for intelligence collection,

identification, and response planning for environmental threats to mission success.
(3) Environmental assessments. List conditions under which environmental assessments

may be required, conditions when assessments may be sensible even when not required by law or
order, and responsibilities for conducting and approving assessments (See Tab A and B).
(4) Occupation of base camps and rear assembly areas. (Occupation of base camps or rear
assembly areas, and subsequent operations, will be accomplished incorporating environmental
considerations whenever feasible and commensurate with the operational situation.)
(a) An initial EBS (see Tab A) will be conducted to determine the preexisting condition of
the site and its ecological resources. Direct the conduct of ECRs based on the duration of stay at a
given site (to give interim snapshot condition reports) and in response to environmental incidents.
(b) Before departure or abandonment, units will perform a final EBS (see Tab A) to
document the condition of the site to include water sources, soil, flora, archaeological/historical
facilities, air quality, and other environmental conditions. Document the location of latrines,
hazardous waste sites, landfills, hospitals, maintenance activities, POL storage, and any other
environmentally-sensitive activities.
(5) Facilities.
(a) Environmental baseline surveys. Specify conditions, formats, responsibilities, and

reporting of initial EBS, final EBS, and any interim ECRs (see Enclosures 1 and 2 and Tab C).
(b) Operating procedures. Provide guidance for environmental considerations and

services in established facilities.
(c) Closure. Specify closure activities such as documentation of the location of latrines,
HW sites, landfills, hospitals, maintenance activities, POL storage, and other environmentally-
sensitive activities. Publication of these procedures may be delayed until a more appropriate phase
of the operation.
(6) Construction. When planning and conducting general engineering operations, military
designers should consider the project’s effect on the environment as well as the applicable US and
HN agreements, and applicable environmental laws and regulations. (Soil erosion/runoff control
procedures and other common sense procedures will be applied to the maximum extent possible in
any case.)
(7) Claims. (Under the provisions of Article XXIII of the United States – Republic of Korea
[US-ROK] SOFA, claims by local national individuals or organizations for damages arising from spills
will be handled through established claims procedures.)
CLASSIFICATION
B-4
CLASSIFICATION
4. SERVICE SUPPORT.
a. Identify those environmental planning factors which, although not mandated as law or
regulation, will support successful execution of the OPLAN, OPORD, CONPLAN, or functional plan
in all phases and protect the health and safety of US, allied forces, and noncombatants. As a
minimum, address certification of local water sources by medical field units, solid and liquid waste
management, HM management, flora and fauna protection, archaeological and historical
preservation, and spill response. Disposal of solid and liquid waste will depend upon the location
and surrounding environment of the disposal area. The intent is to minimize the environmental
impact and to limit potential contamination to the holding site.
(1) Development, use, and protection of potable water sources. Certification of water
sources includes: special considerations for the protection of surface water, groundwater, and
water in distribution systems; location and special protection requirements for water and
wastewater (gray water, see below) treatment facilities; disposal of effluents from showers and
laundry facilities; disposal of brine water (or wastewater) from reverse osmosis water purification
unit (ROWPU) operations. In CONUS, training exercises require a permit to discharge ROWPU
brine into a water source. Returning brine (or wastewater) directly to the source, untreated, also
violates the OEBGD. (Water will be obtained or processed from approved sources. Water quality
th
certifications will be accomplished according with procedures outlined in the 54 MECH DIV field
standing operating procedures (FSOP). Operational and support elements will not contaminate
potable water resources.)
(2) Solid and liquid waste management. (Disposal of solid and liquid wastes will be
dependent on location and surrounding environment of the disposal area. The intent is to
minimize the environmental impact and to limit potential contamination to the holding site.)
(a) Solid waste. Requirements include: Disposal of solid waste (includes sludge);
approval process for the use of landfills or incinerators; and protection of solid waste
transportation, transfer, and disposal facilities. (Solid waste will be removed and disposed of at
ministry of environment approved facilities via wartime HN support agreements. In the absence of
HN support, solid waste should be incinerated as the preferred method of disposal. Alternatively,
burial of waste is acceptable and will employ the characteristics of landfill operations. Trenches
will be perpendicular to the prevailing winds, deep enough to contain the long-term waste stream
expected and to execute a daily cover of not less than 6 inches of earth, with a final cover of not
less than 30 inches. Any trench will be properly marked when closed.)
(b) Human waste. Handle storage and disposal of human waste in a way that best
supports the mission and is most protective of human health. This factor is a particularly
significant in densely populated areas where basic public health services may be disrupted, and
standard field sanitation procedures are inadequate. (Existing sanitary latrines, sewers, and
treatment plants should be used to the maximum extent possible. If such facilities have exceeded
their capacity or do not exist, human waste will be disposed of according to the operation and the
situation encountered. The preferred methods of disposal in order of precedence are sanitary
wastewater disposal systems, portable latrines, and slit trenches. Expeditionary sewage collection
and disposal will be sited and operated to minimize environmental impact according to unit field
sanitation procedures. If possible, do not conduct open burning upwind of populated areas. As a
minimum, all slit trenches will be covered with not less than 24 inches of earth fill [12 inches of
compacted fill level to the ground surface, and 12 inches of mound fill] before departure from the
CLASSIFICATION
B-5
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
CLASSIFICATION
site. A sign showing the date of closure and the words “Closed Latrine” will be posted at each closed
site.)
(c) Gray water. (At locations that lack sewage treatment facilities, the preferred method of
handling gray water will be by collection and proper disposal via wartime HN support. In the event these
preferred options are not achievable during contingency operations or wartime, effluents from showers/
bathing facilities will be located downstream of water sources, both civilian and military. Most rivers in the
Republic of Korea supply water to Korean populations, and gray water discharges into central waters are
prohibited. Construction of temporary drainage facilities must ensure proper drainage of gray water runoff
that precludes pooling. Measures will be taken to prevent creation of pest breeding sites.)
(3) Medical waste. This section includes procedures and locations for storage and disposal of
medical waste under normal and emergency conditions, as well as the responsibilities and procedures for
approval of disposal methods. (Disposal of medical waste will be according to guidelines established by
the XX [US] Corps Surgeon. Should facilities be unavailable for permanent disposal, suitable temporary
disposal should be accomplished through the use of a suitably labeled, segregated containment area.
Wastes will be held in sealed containers or another appropriate manner that minimizes the release of
biological contamination into the environment. A record will be made of the type, quantity, and location of
the containment area. A copy of the report will be forwarded to the XX (US) Corps Staff Engineer Section
and the Surgeon.)
(4) HM/HW management.
(a) HW management. This section includes procedures and locations for the storage and
disposal of HW under normal and emergency conditions, operations of the DRMO or approved contractor
facilities, and the recording of abandoned HW sites. (HW will be collected, packaged, and transferred to
the DLA/DRMO when feasible according to guidelines established by the XX [US] Corps G4.) (If the
operational situation dictates abandonment of HM/HW, consolidate, contain, and record the location of the
items, type of items, and any other information that will facilitate future recovery operations. Forward a
copy of the report to both the XX [US] Corps Staff Engineer Section and G4.)
(b) HM management. (HMs will be stored, transported, and used according to established
procedures and in a manner that precludes improper human or ecological exposure. To the extent
practical, consolidation and reutilization will be applied to reduce the amount of HM expended and waste
generated.)
(c) Abandonment. (If the operational situation dictates abandonment of hazardous
material/waste; consolidate, contain, and record the location of the items, type of items, and any other
information that will assist future recovery operations. Forward a copy of the report to both the XX [US]
Corps Staff Engineer Section and G4.)
(d) Spill prevention/control procedures. (Commanders will maintain spill-prevention/control

th
plans with battalion level spill response teams, according to the 54 MECH DIV FSOP. Units will take
immediate action to contain the spill, clean up the site to the limit of their capability, mark the site, and
report the spill through their chain of command to the XX [US] Corps Staff Engineer Section, PAO, and
G4. The spill report should be in basic ECR format [see Tab B] and at a minimum contain the location,
type and quantity of contaminant[s], status of the clean up, and an estimate of additional resources
required to complete the clean up.)
CLASSIFICATION
B-6
CLASSIFICATION
(5) Ecosystem protection. Protect special flora and fauna, wetlands, forests, and
croplands, and seek approval for the clearing of large areas and approved methods and
chemicals, if any, for clearing. (The requirement to clear fields of fire [as well as limited clearance
for health, safety, and troop welfare] may cause the destruction of ecosystems. Destruction and
clearing of areas in excess of 100 acres requires the approval of Commander, XX [US] Corps.)
(6) Air and noise emissions. Give special consideration to preventing air and noise
emissions—normally confined to theater rear areas or to security, support, or humanitarian
missions. (Generators will be operated only in the reduced sound signature mode as defined in
th
54 MECH DIV FSOP…Movement of tracked vehicles outside of designated assembly areas,
from 0001-2400 on Sundays during this exercise, is prohibited without permission of Commander,
XX [US] Corps.)
(7) Archaeological and historical preservation. State the requirements to minimize

damage to historical sites and buildings, monuments, and works of art. A separate overlay may
be required. (Operational activities that adversely impact on archaeological and historic sites and
buildings are to be minimized. If damage occurs, a report of circumstances will be made through
operational channels to XX [US] Corps Civil Affairs and the PAO.)
b. Logistics. Address any necessary guidance for administering the environmental effort by
the commander. Provide guidance for logistic support to environmental support and compliance.
(1) HM management. Specify unique control measures used in supply, storage,

transportation, and retrograde to reduce and regulate the use of HM.
(2) Environmental considerations and services locations. Provide, when appropriate, the
location of landfills, incinerators, HW collection facilities, water and wastewater treatment plants,
watershed protection areas, ecologically-sensitive areas, contaminated areas, potentially
dangerous industrial facilities, and other points of environmental sensitivity or interest to the
command. Include cultural resources if not noted elsewhere.
5. COMMAND AND SIGNAL.
a. Command. Identify the executive agent for environmental functions in the command and
CP location. Specify responsibilities and levels for issuing guidance and waivers.
b. Signal. List environmental reporting instructions not specified in unit SOPs; identify the
required reports, formats, times and distribution lists.
NAME (An appendix can be

signed by either the commander or
primary staff officer.)
RANK
CLASSIFICATION
B-7
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
CLASSIFICATION
Tabs:
A. Environmental Assessments
B. Environmental Assessment Exemptions
C. Environmental Baseline Survey
D. Base Camp Closure Standards (TBP)
E. Electronic Environmental Report Message Formats
CLASSIFICATION
B-8
CLASSIFICATION
TAB A (ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS) TO APPENDIX 2 (ENVIRONMENTAL

CONSIDERATIONS) TO ANNEX F (ENGINEER) TO 54TH MECH DIV OPLAN 99-7 (U)
References:
a. DODD 6050.7, “Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Department of Defense Actions,” 31

March 1979.
b. JSI 3820.01, “Environmental Engineering Effects of DOD Actions,” 28 September1993.
c. JCS Pub 4-04, “Joint Doctrine for Civil Engineering Support,” 26 September 1995.
d. DODD 6050.16, “Policy for Establishing and Implementing Environmental Standards at

Overseas Installations,” 20 September 1991.
e. Applicable country-specific FGS.
f. DOD OEBGD, or in-theater equivalent, October 1992.
g. Civil Engineering Support Plan (CESP), in AOR.
1. Purpose. State the regulatory, legal, troop protection, financial, or other reason for conducting an
environmental assessment in conjunction with the supported operation.
2. Background. State the purpose and concept of the operation and a brief explanation of the
relationship of environmental assessments to the successful completion of the operational mission.
3. Description of the Actions. State the types of assessments and the conditions under which actions
are required. When “major actions” (defined in Reference A) are included in the operation, indicate
whether an exemption applies (Tab B of this appendix). If no exemption is being invoked, state the
type of assessment(s) to be prepared: environmental impact statement (EIS), environmental statement
(ES), or environmental report (ER) (see Reference A). Indicate requirements for a facility EBS.
4. Exemption or Exclusion. Describe the basis for exemption (Tab B of this appendix). Finally,
determine and document the applicability to the operation. Seek approval from a higher authority
according to Reference A if applicability is not clearly stated.
5. Analysis of Options or Alternatives. If an ER, ES, or EIS is required, document the actions and
alternatives that were considered in planning the supported operation to minimize environmental
impact.
CLASSIFICATION
Figure B-2. Tab A (Environmental Assessments) to Appendix 2 (Environmental Considerations)

to Annex F (Engineer)
B-9
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
CLASSIFICATION
6. Environmental Setting of the Operation. (This and the following paragraphs are useful for
scoping/tiering analyses.) Describe or provide references for the description of the general
environmental conditions of the operational area, including (a) vegetation, (b) climate, (c) wildlife, (d)
archeological and historic sites, (e) water quality, and (f) air quality.
7. Environmental Impact of the Operation. Describe the impact on the (a) topography, (b) vegetation,
(c) water quality, (d) air quality, (e) ecosystem functioning, (f) archeological and historical sites, (g)
wildlife, (h) socio-economic and political end state, (i) land use, (j) safety and public and occupational
health, and (k) HM and HW use and disposal.
8. Mitigation and Monitoring.
(a) Requirements. Describe actions and assign responsibilities for mitigation and monitoring of
environmental impacts of the supported operation (see Reference C, Chapter II, paragraph 4).
(b) Compliance Responsibilities. State applicability and responsibility for implementation of the
OEBGD or FGS during the post-hostilities phase. (See Reference D for assistance.)
CLASSIFICATION
Figure B-2. Tab A (Environmental Assessments) to Appendix 2 (Environmental Considerations)

to Annex F (Engineer) (continued)
B-10
CLASSIFICATION
TAB B (ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EXEMPTIONS) TO APPENDIX 2 (ENVIRONMENTAL

References:
a. DODD 6050.7, “Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Department of Defense Actions,” 31

March 1979.
b. Joint staff instruction (JSI) 3820.01, “Environmental Engineering Effects of DOD Actions,” 28
September 1993.
1. Purpose. State the basis for invoking or requesting an exclusion or exemption from environmental
assessment, according to Reference A, for the supported operation.
2. Background. State facts identified in the planning process which support an exemption from the
requirement of environmental analysis and documentation.
3. Discussion. Provide factual rationale for invoking an exemption. Assign responsibility for making
exemption determination.
4. Determination. Identify and document the authority making the exemption determination.
CLASSIFICATION
Figure B-3. Tab B (Environmental Assessment Exemptions) to Appendix 2 (Environmental

Considerations) to Annex F (Engineer)
B-11
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
CLASSIFICATION
TAB C (ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE SURVEYS [EBS]) TO APPENDIX 2 (ENVIRONMENTAL

References:
a. DODD 6050.7, “Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Department of Defense Actions,” 31 March
1979.
b. JSI 3820.01, “Environmental Engineering Effects of DOD Actions,” 28 September 1993.
1. Purpose. The primary purpose of an EBS is to identify environmental, health, and safety conditions that
pose a potential health threat to military personnel and civilians that occupy properties used by the US military
in the TO. The secondary purpose is to document environmental conditions at the initial occupancy of
property to prevent the US from receiving unfounded claims for past environmental damages.
2. EBS Requirement. State the requirement for performing an EBS, the time by which the initial EBS is to be
completed, and responsibilities for conducting and reporting.
3. Applicability. Describe conditions under which the EBS is required or may be waived.
4. Description. EBSs are divided into initial and closure investigations. The initial investigation is designed to
provide an initial overview of the property using real-time field sampling. The initial investigation is updated
when there are indications of the potential for significant environmental or health hazard and involves a more
comprehensive analysis designed to quantify an identified hazard. Comprehensive analysis requires more
time when it uses more specialized equipment that may not be available to all survey teams. The closure
EBS is a part of base-camp closure standards but is not limited to base camps (logistics areas,
communications sites, airfields, staging areas). To effectively complete the closure report it is essential to
reference the initial EBS (and update if applicable) and the log of periodic environmental conditions report(s)
(ECRs) that have been completed on the particular site/area. The ECR is completed on a periodic basis to
document conditions at the site/area as well as any time a potentially significant environmental event occurs.
See Enclosure 2 of this tab for an example. This description identifies the protocol to be used in conducting
both the initial and closure EBSs. This may include a checklist from a theater regulation or environmental
compliance assessment or some other means of guidance. Also address the frequency of ECRs and what
constitutes a “significant environmental event.”
5. Support. List military or contractual support for conducting an EBS. This list may include training for unit
officers, preventive medicine personnel, chemical reconnaissance platoons, Logistics Civil Augmentation
Program (LOGCAP), and Corps of Engineers support.
6. Reporting. Describe report formats, reporting chain, and disposition.
Enclosures:
1. Environmental Baseline Survey
2. Environmental Conditions Report
3. Maps, Photographs, and Digital Data
CLASSIFICATION
Figure B-4. Tab C (Environmental Baseline Surveys) to Appendix 2 (Environmental Considerations) to

Annex F (Engineer)
B-12
CLASSIFICATION
ENCLOSURE 1 (ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE SURVEY [EBS]) TO TAB C (ENVIRONMENTAL
BASELINE SURVEYS) TO APPENDIX 2 (ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS) TO ANNEX F
(ENGINEER) TO 54TH MECH DIV OPLAN 99-7 (U)
References:
a. DODD 6050.7, 31 March 1979, “Environmental Effects Abroad of Major DOD Actions.”
b. JSI 3820.01, 28 September 1993, “Environmental Engineering Effects of DOD Actions.”
c. DODD 6050.16, 20 September 1991, “Policy for Establishing and Implementing Environmental
Standards at Overseas Installations.”
d. Other applicable environmental laws and regulations.
e. Command guidance references.
f. For a closure EBS, the initial EBS (and any applicable update) and any ECRs are also reference
documents.
1. Site/Property Location. List the legal address and 6-digit military grid location or latitude and
longitude.
2. General Site Setting. Note whether the site was visually observed or identified from interviews or
record reviews. For an updated initial EBS or a closure EBS, the site should always be visually
observed.
a. The methodology used and limitations encountered during the initial (or updated) site
reconnaissance or the closure inspection. Describe the method used to reconnoiter the property; for
example, the use of grid patterns or other systematic approach. List and describe any limitations
encountered during the reconnaissance such as physical obstructions, bodies of water, pavement,
weather, or uncooperative occupants.
b. The current uses of the property. Be as specific as possible.
c. The past uses of the property. List all known past property uses. If a past use is likely to have
involved the use, treatment, storage, disposal, or generation of HMs or petroleum products, include a
detailed description or indicators of this use. A closure EBS includes information obtained from ECRs as
well.
d. Current uses of adjoining properties. Be as specific as possible.
e. Past uses of adjoining properties. If a past use is likely to have indicated recognized adverse
environmental conditions, include a detailed description.
CLASSIFICATION
Figure B-5. Enclosure 1 (Environmental Baseline Survey) to Tab C (Environmental Baseline

Figure B-4. Tab C (Environmental Baseline Surveys) to Appendix 2 (Environmental
Surveys) to Appendix 2 (Environmental Considerations) to Annex F (Engineer)
Considerations) to Annex F (Engineer) (continued)
B-13
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
CLASSIFICATION
f. Current or past uses of the surrounding areas: list general types of past uses; for example, residential,
agricultural, or industrial. Limit surroundings to that which can be seen or would clearly affect the area, such
as upstream on a waterway.
g. Geologic, hydrogeologic, hydrologic, or topographic conditions. List the conditions and give a general
description of the topography in the area. If indicated, analyze the likelihood of contaminant migration on or to
the property through the soil or groundwater from the adjacent properties or the surrounding areas.
h. General description of structures. List the buildings, and their locations, size, basic construction type,
stories, and approximate age.
i. Roads. List all public thoroughfares adjoining the property and describe all roads, streets, parking
areas, and walkways.
j. Water supply. List and differentiate all sources of potable and nonpotable water.
k. Sewage disposal system. Describe sewage disposal systems on the property and their general
condition, and approximate age.
3. Interior and Exterior Observations. To the extent visually/physically observed or identified from interviews
or record reviews (list actual source).
a. HM and petroleum products. Describe uses and types of products used on the property, and the
approximate amount and storage conditions. Indicate if treatment, storage, disposal, or generation occurred
on the property.
b. Storage tanks. Describe size, location, condition, and approximate age of all above and below-ground
storage tanks.
c. Odors. Describe any noticeable odors and their source.
d. Pools of liquid. Note all surface water and describe all pools or sumps that contain water or other
liquids that may contain HM.
e. Drums. Describe all drums and their conditions. If they are known to contain no HM, list contents only.
f. Hazardous substances and petroleum products. Describe all products to include type, amount, and
manner/condition of storage.
g. Unidentified substance containers. Describe any open or damaged containers suspected of containing
HM or petroleum products.
h. PCBs. Include a description of electrical or hydraulic equipment likely to contain PCBs.
CLASSIFICATION
Figure B-5. Enclosure 1 (Environmental Baseline Survey) to Tab C (Environmental Baseline Surveys)
to Appendix 2 (Environmental Considerations) to Annex F (Engineer) (continued)
B-14
CLASSIFICATION
i. Interior observations of the following:
(1) Heating and cooling systems. Describe, to include the fuel source and amount on hand.
(2) Stains and corrosion. Describe stains on floors, walls, and ceilings.
(3) Drains and sumps. Describe floor drains and sumps.
j. Exterior observations of the following:
(1) Pits, ponds, and lagoons. Describe the pit, pond, or lagoon, especially if it may have been used
for HW disposal or waste treatment. Include a discussion and description of any on adjacent or adjoining
properties as well.
(2) Stained soil or pavement. Describe any stained soil or pavement.
(3) Stressed vegetation. Describe any stressed vegetation and probable cause.
(4) Solid waste. Describe any filled, graded, or mounded areas that would suggest the disposal of
trash or solid waste.
(5) Wastewater. Describe every discharge of a liquid into a stream or ditch that is adjacent to the
property.
(6) Wells. Locate and describe all wells (monitoring, potable, dry, irrigation, injection, abandoned,
etc.) on the property.
(7) Septic systems. List indications or the existence of on-site septic systems or cesspools.
(8) Ambient air quality. Smog, smoke, and odors from industrial facilities and many HW products can
be detected easily. Terrain can also affect air quality. Mountains and canyons can cause temperature
inversions, which impact air quality. Setting up base camps with heating units and vehicles in an area prone
to temperature inversions can cause poor air quality. Prevailing winds should also be considered.
(9) Unexploded ordnance. Identify and ensure clearance before occupation.
4. Deletions and Deviations. Describe all deviations or deletions from the protocol (checklist) used or the
environmental standards currently in use by the command. Discuss each one individually and in detail.
5. Findings and Conclusions Statement. List the protocol used for the survey, exceptions to the protocol, and
any evidence of recognized adverse environmental conditions.
6. Qualification Statement. List the qualifications and duty position(s) of the individual(s) preparing the EBS.
CLASSIFICATION
Figure B-5. Enclosure 1 (Environmental Baseline Survey) to Tab C (Environmental Baseline Surveys)
to Appendix 2 (Environmental Considerations) to Annex F (Engineer) (continued)
B-15
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
CLASSIFICATION
ENCLOSURE 2 (ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS REPORT [ECR]) TO TAB C (ENVIRONMENTAL

BASELINE SURVEYS) TO APPENDIX 2 (ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS) TO ANNEX F
(ENGINEER) TO 54TH MECH DIV OPLAN 99-7 (U)
References:
a. DODD 6050.7, “Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Department of Defense Actions,” 31 March
1979.
b. JSI 3820.01, “Environmental Engineering Effects of DOD Actions,” 28 September 1993.
c. DODD 6050.16, “Policy for Establishing and Implementing Environmental Standards at Overseas
Installations,” 20 September 1991.
d. Other applicable environmental laws and regulations, OPORD, and unit SOP.
e. Site specific EBS (if applicable).
f. Electronic Environmental Message Formats in Tab E.
1. Site/Incident Location. List the legal address and 6-digit military grid location or latitude and longitude
of the incident location or reference the applicable EBS to link the ECR to a given site. Refer to the
electronic environmental message formats at Tab E. (The ECR functions as a situation report (SITREP),
or interim report, for a given site. The frequency of ECR reports is a higher headquarters’ decision but
supports the need to document the condition of a given site over time [interim snapshots], as well as
helping to ensure that an appropriate environmental focus is being maintained at a given site. The basic
format of the ECR may also be used when reporting an incident, such as a POL spill, not related to a
given EBS or site location.)
2. Site/Incident Description and Background. Give a brief description of the site (installation), including
its related EBS/historical use(s) or the circumstances surrounding the incident. For an incident at a
location not covered by an EBS, it is critical to provide the same sort of information contained in a
standard accident report.
3. Map/Description of the Incident Location. If the ECR is related to a site covered by an EBS, this entry
is able to relate to the information already provided in the EBS (a baseline document). If the ECR
defines a location where an incident has occurred that is not covered by an EBS, the description needs
to be adequate to direct a follow-on element to the site. In this respect, it is similar to the graves-
registration report if the incident occurs during a tactical operation where time precludes remaining at the
site.
4. Summary of Environmental Conditions. List the environmental event(s) at the site/location. All spills
should be inventoried. If the ECR is a periodic report for a given site, significant events, such as major
spills, should have been reported using the basic ECR format. In this case, simply reference any
significant incident report ECRs that may have occurred at the given site over the time frame that the
periodic ECR covers. Also provide a “snapshot” report of the types of HW/HM that are stored at the site.
Describe minor spills and other events that have occurred over the time frame in question in basic terms,
including quantities and the method(s) used to clean the site.
CLASSIFICATION
Figure B-6. Enclosure 2 (Environmental Conditions Report) to Tab C (Environmental Baseline

Surveys) to Appendix 2 (Environmental Considerations) to Annex F (Engineer)
B-16
CLASSIFICATION
Example: Four gallons of waste oil spilled at the hazardous waste accumulation site (HWAS) located
northwest of the maintenance building (shown on map) at 1600 hours on 16 December 2000. The
22nd Military Police Battalion (MP Bn), contained the spill with assistance by White & Jones, by 1725
hours. About 3 cubic yards of contaminated soil was taken to the White & Jones HW disposal area in
Juvonia.
Example: Raw sewage ran from a pump house behind the main warehouse (shown on map) for an
estimated 3 days during the initial stages of occupying the camp in early June 2000. The problem was
identified on 13 June and corrected when the pump was repaired on 14 June.
Example: A fuel tanker overturned at the road intersection vicinity NV 123456 (see map) at 092000
November 2000 during the road march to Bigtown. Immediate mitigation included spill containment by
the employment of all available spill kits with the unit. Higher HQ was immediately notified. An
estimated 4000 gallons of jet petroleum (JP)-8 spilled at that site. The vehicle has been righted, and
excavation of the site will begin at first light, 10 November.
5. Interior and Exterior Observations. These entries should be viewed as an abbreviated version of the
information that would be found in an EBS. Items should only be addressed if they differ from the last
ECR or vary from the initial EBS.
6. Findings and Determinations with Qualification Statement. A statement similar to the following
should appear in this paragraph of the ECR:
According to _________ Reg _______, I have considered whether or not significant environmental
impacts will occur as a result of turnover/return of this site (base camp, logistics area) and have
determined that (include one of the following statements):
a. Turnover of this base camp area will not result in environmental impacts significant
enough to warrant additional environmental analysis.
OR
b. Turnover of this base camp area will result in environmental impacts significant enough
to warrant additional environmental analysis. Environmental actions or projects must continue after
transfer of the base camp area because of substantial (imminent) threat to human health or safety. The
impacts of concern are (list impacts):
(If the report is due to an incident not connected to a specific site/installation, this paragraph
is an assessment by the commander/individual on the scene.)
John Q. Jones
MAJ, QM
Mayor, Camp Swampy
CLASSIFICATION
Figure B-6. Enclosure 2 (Environmental Conditions Report) to Tab C (Environmental Baseline

Surveys) to Appendix 2 (Environmental Considerations) to Annex F (Engineer) (continued)
B-17
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
CLASSIFICATION
TAB E (ELECTRONIC ENVIRONMENTAL MESSAGE FORMATS) TO APPENDIX 2
(ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS) TO ANNEX F (ENGINEER) TO 54TH MECH DIV OPLAN
99-7 (U)
References: FM 101-5-2, “US Army Reports and Message Formats,” 29 June 1999.
1. ( ) ECR Format.
TITLE: ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION REPORT (ECR)

REPORT NUMBER: E035
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS: Used to send periodic information (interim snapshots) of the

environmental status of specific sites (assembly areas, base camps, logistical support areas, and
medical facilities) where hazards are likely to occur and can result in significant, immediate and/or
long-term effects on the natural environment and/or health of friendly forces and noncombatants. Sent
in accordance with unit SOP and commander’s direction.
LINE 1—DATE AND TIME _______________________________ (Date-time Group [DTG])

LINE 2—UNIT _________________________________________ (Unit making report)
LINE 3—LOCATION ____________________________________ (universal traverse mercator [UTM]
or six-digit grid coordinate with
MGRS grid zone designator of
site/incident)
LINE 4—DESCRIPTION _________________________________ (Description of site/incident)
LINE 5—CHANGES_____________________________________ (Changes from last ECR or EBS)
LINE 6—HAZARDS _____________________________________ (Hazards to natural environment,
friendly forces, and/or civilian
personnel)
LINE 7—ACTIONS _____________________________________ (Summary of actions to minimize
hazards/remedial effects)
LINE 8—UNIT POC _____________________________________ (Reporting unit point of contact)
LINE 9—ASSISTANCE __________________________________ (Assistance required/requested)
LINE 10—REFERENCE _________________________________ (Site specific EBS, if required)
LINE 11—NARRATIVE __________________________________ (Free text for additional information
required for clarification of report)
LINE 12—AUTHENTICATION_____________________________ (Report authentication)
CLASSIFICATION
Figure B-7. Tab E (Electronic Environmental Message Formats) to Appendix 2 (Environmental

Considerations) to Annex F (Engineer)
B-18
CLASSIFICATION
2. ( ) Electronic Spill Report Message Format.
TITLE: SPILL REPORT (SPILLREP)

REPORT NUMBER: S055
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS: Used to send timely information or status of an oil, hazardous material, or
hazardous waste spill that could have immediate environmental and/or health effects. Sent in
accordance with SOP and commander’s direction. NOTE: Spill reporting and reportable quantities are
mandated by federal and local law.
LINE 1—DATE AND TIME ________________________________(DTG)

LINE 2—UNIT __________________________________________(Unit making report)
LINE 3—DATE/TIME ____________________________________(DTG of spill discovery)
LINE 4—MATERIAL _____________________________________(Material spilled)
LINE 5—QUANTITY _____________________________________(Quantity of spilled material)
LINE 6—LOCATION _____________________________________(UTM or six-digit grid coordinate with
MGRS grid zone designator of spill)
LINE 7—CAUSE ________________________________________(Cause and supervising unit)
LINE 8—SIZE __________________________________________(Size of affected area)
LINE 9—DAMAGE ______________________________________(Damage to the natural environment,
if required)
LINE 10—HAZARDS ____________________________________(Hazards to natural environment,
friendly forces, and/or civilian
personnel)
LINE 11—ACTIONS _____________________________________(Summary of actions taken)
LINE 12—UNIT POC ____________________________________(Supervising unit POC)
LINE 13—ASSISTANCE__________________________________(Assistance required/requested)
LINE 14—NARRATIVE ___________________________________(Free text for additional information
LINE 15—AUTHENTICATION _______________________________ (Report authentication)
CLASSIFICATION
Figure B-7. Tab E (Electronic Environmental Message Formats) to Appendix 2 (Environmental

Considerations) to Annex F (Engineer) (continued)
B-19
Appendix C
Unit Environmental SOP

This SOP is an example of a unit environmental SOP. Because each
installation has different local, state, or HN requirements, this SOP
must be modified based on consultation with the installation’s
environmental staff. The SOP is divided into six sections (maintenance,
supply, NBC, communication, field-mess operations, and
operations/training) which correspond to the typical unit organization
(see Figure C-1, pages C-2 to C-20). Units should extract these sections
and incorporate them into the appropriate section of its own SOP.
Alternatively, a unit may use this sample as a guide in developing a
stand-alone environmental SOP. While this approach elevates the
visibility and importance of environmental issues and procedures, unit
personnel in specific functional areas may overlook the information. A
sample spill-response plan, list of recommended equipment that should
be maintained in the unit/activity spill kit, and instructions for using the
electronic spill report message formats can be found in Tab A (see Figure
C-2, page C-21), Tab B (see Figure C-3, page C-24), and Tab C (see Figure
C-4, page C-26), respectively.
C-0
APPENDIX ____ TO ANNEX___

ENVIRONMENTAL STANDING OPERATING PROCEDURES
Unit Designation
Mailing Address
Date
1. References.
Installation Environmental SOP, Higher HQ Environmental SOP, and AR 200-1.
2. Purpose.
a. This appendix standardizes procedures for environmental compliance with federal, state,
local, and HN laws and regulations. Failure to comply may result in the following:
(1) Endangerment of personnel health and safety.
(2) Citations by federal and state regulating agencies.
(3) Civil or military penalties against offenders.
(4) Delay or halt in mission accomplishment.
b. This appendix is applicable to all assigned or attached personnel and governs the
environmental aspects of all unit activities.
3. Responsibilities.
a. Commander.
(1) Establishes unit HM and HW management policy.
(2) Ensures that personnel comply with the provisions of referenced SOPs, regulations,
and public law.
(3) Ensures that the ECO, the HM/HW coordinator, and senior personnel have received
the proper training, and that they, in turn, train their subordinates.
(4) Ensures that all personnel who are exposed to HM in the course of their work receive
initial training within 90 days of assignment concerning the hazards to which they are
exposed and the precautions required to protect themselves in the work environment.
These personnel must also receive annual refresher training.
Figure C-1. Unit environmental SOP
C-1
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
(5) Ensures that all unit personnel receive initial environmental awareness training
within 90 days of assignment and refresher training annually thereafter.
(6) Ensures all unit personnel have received hazard communication training (OSHA
requirement).
(7) Ensures that all environmental training is properly documented, and records are
filed in the unit operations/training office.
(8) Ensures that a self-inspection program is in effect for the unit.
b. Executive Officer.
(1) Serves as the commander’s eyes and ears for environmental matters.
(2) Conducts periodic unit self-assessment surveys.
(3) Overses environmental integration into staff operations.
c. ECO and HW/HM (MOS 9954) Marine.
(1) Provides advice on environmental compliance to the commander.
(2) Serves as a link between the unit commander and higher/installation headquarters’
environmental staff.
(3) Performs other duties as outlined in Chapter 1 of this manual.
d. Maintenance Officer.
(1) Serves as the unit’s HM/HW coordinator.
(2) Serves as the unit’s spill response coordinator.
(3) Ensures accountability for all HM and HW.
(4) Ensures that HM and HW are stored and disposed of properly.
(5) Ensures that HM and HW spills are immediately contained and reported to the fire
department and the installation’s environmental office.
(6) Reports nonfunctional/inoperative treatment/collection facilities (oil/grease

interceptors, floor drains, catch basins, waste tanks) to the installation’s environmental
office via the unit’s ECO.
e. Motor Sergeant.
(1) Establishes and maintains an HW accumulation (HW less than 55 gallons) area
with proper separation of incompatible products.
Figure C-1. Unit environmental SOP (continued)
C-2
(2) Inspects HW accumulation areas weekly and documents results.
(3) Ensures that leaking containers are overpacked and/or the uncontaminated contents
containerized in functional containers.
(4) Ensures that only waste oil is placed in the waste oil tank or drums.
(5) Ensures that the waste oil tank or drums are pumped out when full or 90 days after
previous pumping, whichever occurs first (check with installation EC).
(6) Ensures that the washrack oil/water separator is clean and serviceable.
(7) Maintains an inventory log of all stored waste products, to include exact location of each
container.
(8) Labels all HW containers properly as they are put in service and ensures turn-in and
delivery to the DRMO or contractor and pick up within 90 days of accumulation start date
(coordinate with the EMO).
f. Unit Supply Sergeant.
(1) Initiates and processes turn-in documents (TIDs) for the turn-in of HM and HW.
(2) Maintains a suspense file and validates receipt copies of TIDs for all scrap, HM, and HW
shipped to the DRMO.
g. PLL Clerk. Requisitions mercury and lithium batteries with recoverability code "A" only upon turn-in
of a like item and quantity.
h. NBC NCO.
(1) Inspects all possible decontaminant solution 2 (DS2) and super tropical bleach (STB)
accumulation sites (connexes, wall lockers, POL accumulation area, and so forth) to ensure
that these products have been properly turned over to DOL/supply for consolidated storage.
(2) If the unit is temporarily in possession of decontamination agents DS2 or STB:
(a) Ensures that DS2 and STB are stored in separate locations.
(b) Inspects containers monthly for leakage, and records results. Arranges for leakers
to be overpacked and turned in to the DRMO.
(3) Properly disposes of nuclear, biological, and chemical (NBC) related training material
that is classified as hazardous according to installation directives and DRMO policies.
C-3
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
i. Mechanics.
(1) Place HW in properly designated containers.
(2) Never place HW in a dumpster; this is an illegal disposal.
(3) Promptly report leaks/spills to the motor sergeant and/or maintenance officer. Report
spills directly to the fire department and installation’s environmental office, if necessary, to
ensure prompt response.
(4) Wear proper protective clothing when handling HM or HW.
(5) Keep HM and HW accumulation containers closed except to add or remove product.
j. Medics.
(1) Segregate medical waste from non-medical waste at the point of generation.
(2) Place medical waste in designated containers.
(3) Wear proper protective clothing when handling medical waste.
(4) Store collected medical waste in a secure manner/area.
k. Individual Soldiers.
(1) Comply with the unit’s environmental requirements and the installation’s SOP.
(2) Maintain environmental awareness throughout daily activities.
(3) Provide recommendations to the chain of command on techniques to ensure

compliance with environmental regulatory requirements.
(4) Identify the environmental risks associated with individual and team tasks.
(5) Support recycling programs.
(6) Report HM and HW spills immediately to (phone number for spill reporting).
(7) Make sound environmental decisions in the absence of a supervisor or specific

command guidance by considering the following:
(a) Prior training.
(b) General guidance from the chain of command.
(c) Concept of right and wrong.
C-4
(d) Common sense.
(e) Environmental ethic.
4. Safety.
a. Material Safety Data Sheet. MSDSs provide critical information for safeguarding human health and
protecting the environment. This information includes the hazardous characteristics of the substance,
the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), spill-response procedures, signs and symptoms
of overexposure, and first aid procedures. MSDSs can be obtained through unit supply channels and
should be maintained at each location where HM is being used. It is important to note that MSDSs are
material- and manufacturer- specific, which means that each brand name of a chemical has a different
MSDS.
b. Personal Protective Equipment. PPE is the primary means of safeguarding human health when
handling HM/HW. The most important aspect when choosing the appropriate PPE for a given
operation is the hazardous characteristics of the substance. Always refer to the manufacturer’s MSDS
before choosing the appropriate PPE. If the prescribed PPE cannot be obtained during a field or
contingency operation, field-expedient PPE should be used to help protect soldiers when handling
HM/HW or in the event of a spill. Leaders ensure that their soldiers and Marines have the appropriate
PPE when exposed to HM/HW during handling. Recommended field-expedient PPE is listed below:
HM/HW stream Field-expedient PPE

1. Fuel products 1. Field gloves, goggles, wet-weather gear
2. Oil products/lubricants 2. Field gloves, goggles
3. Antifreeze 3. Field gloves, goggles
4. Acid batteries 4. Double-lined field gloves, goggles, wet-weather gear
5. Medical waste 5. Field gloves, goggles, wet-weather gear
6. Pesticides 6. Consult the MSDS and Preventive Medicine
NOTE: Field-expedient PPE should only be used when the required PPE is not available since it
does not provide the level of protection recommended by the manufacturer. Additionally, field-
expedient PPE that is used to handle HM/HW should not be used for normal operations after being
used as PPE.
C-5
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
SECTION 1 - MAINTENANCE
1. General.
a. Select maintenance activity sites so that POL-contaminated water will not enter a storm drain.
b. Conduct the following activities daily:
(1) Check the level of used oil in storage tanks. Schedule for tanks to be picked up when
3/4 full.
(2) Clean all foreign material from drip pans and above-ground oil tank screens.
(3) Empty refuse barrels when 3/4 full to prevent overflows.
c. Procure, store, and use only those chemical products specifically authorized by the
appropriate technical manual (TM) or lubrication order (LO) for the level of maintenance
performed.
d. Keep MSDSs for all chemicals/solvents/materials used in work areas in a file that is readily
accessible to personnel who work there. Brief personnel on chemical hazards, protective clothing
requirements, first aid, and spill response before they use hazardous chemicals.
e. Use products that are safe and biodegradable, when possible.
f. Comply with the Army’s oil analysis program (AOAP) as a method of reducing the amount of
waste oil produced.
g. Properly label, segregate, and store HM.
2. Maintenance Bays.
a. Conduct maintenance washing/steam cleaning at the motor pool’s washrack—not in the

maintenance bay. (Maintenance cleaning in the bays will be authorized only during extended,
below freezing temperatures that interfere with the vehicle maintenance mission [applicable only if
equipped with an oil/water separator].)
b. Do not wash heavily soiled and/or oily maintenance bay floors with solvent or other
unauthorized material. Clean up oil and fuel with dry sweep or rags only. Collect dry sweep and
dirt in nonleaking containers as HW for disposal through the DRMO.
c. Confine solvent use to solvent washing machines that meet the National Fire Prevention
Association’s safety regulation standards. Obtain approval for use of solvents, other than mineral
spirits, from the installation’s environmental office before use.
d. Ensure that all solvent washing machines have lids, which remain closed when not in use.
C-6
e. Do not sweep or dump trash, garbage, nuts, bolts, and other solid waste into floor drains or
mix with used dry sweep. Put such items into covered, leak-proof containers. Empty containers
into dumpsters, as needed, to prevent spillover.
f. Place drip pans under points of leakage on vehicles with known seeps and leaks to preclude
discharges into wastewater collection systems. Drain all water from drip pans daily and dispose
into a sanitary sewer drain protected by an oil separator.
g. Use the exhaust ventilation system whenever a stationary vehicle is running inside the
maintenance bay.
h. Keep catch buckets in all floor drains that are designed for them. Inspect and empty dry
sweep and trash daily. In bays not equipped with oil-water separators should keep floor drains
permanently closed if HM/HW are handled or stored there.
3. Grease Racks/Pits.
a. Use approved used oil tanks to collect and subsequently recycle used oil. (Grease racks and
maintenance or inspection pits are designed for oil change and vehicle lubrication only.)
b. Introduce only uncontaminated used motor oil into the used oil tanks. Use separate
containers for hydraulic, transmission and brake fluids. Do not place solvent, fuel, water,
antifreeze, dirt, dry sweep, hardware, or trash in used oil tanks.
c. Dispose of used oil, transmission, and fuel filters in normal trash containers after draining for
24 hours and double bagging in plastic. (Units/installations should purchase equipment for
pressing oil from filters and then recycling the metal.)
d. Mark and position containers for new and used dry sweep at the grease rack to clean up
spills or leaks.
e. Keep floor of the grease rack and the immediate surrounding area free of POL buildup.
4. Washracks.
a. Use washracks for light exterior washing only. Wash extremely soiled vehicles at the
installation’s central vehicle wash facilities.
b. Obtain authorization from the installation’s environmental office for cleaners used in washing
activities, since cleaners will drain into the sanitary sewer. Post readable signs to indicate
specific, authorized cleaners, solvents, or soaps.
c. Do not use portable steam cleaners or clean engines at washracks. These activities cause
the oil to suspend in the water and the separator to function improperly. Only use steam
cleaners in designated areas.
d. Do not pour POL products, solvents, antifreeze, or other regulated substances into washrack
drains.
C-7
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
e. Position trash containers at washracks for disposal of refuse generated during the washing
process.
f. Do not sweep dirt and trash resulting from washing vehicles into the washrack or pile trash along
the perimeter. Place trash in proper containers for disposal at the landfill. Report quantities of dirt in
excess of what can reasonably be placed in a trash container to the installation for disposal.
g. To prevent pooling and possible discharge into storm drains, immediately discontinue washing if
a washrack drain becomes clogged. Notify a supervisor to call in a work-order request immediately.
Maintain washrack as “out-of-service” until all necessary repairs are made.
h. The motor sergeant will do the following on a daily basis:
(1) Check for leaking water hydrants and report leaks to the DPW or facility engineer work
order desk.
(2) Check for proper policing of the washrack, and ensure that the area is free of trash, oil-
soaked rags, and soil/sand.
(3) Inspect drains and sand traps to ensure proper operation of the washrack drainage
system. Call the DPW work-order section if plugged.
(4) Inspect oil-water separator for proper operation.
5. Parts/Material Requisitioning and Storage Areas.
a. Requisition the minimum quantity required for mission accomplishment.
b. Ensure recoverability codes are used whenever applicable.
c. Keep a copy of the applicable MSDS for each HM on-hand in a binder in the parts storage area.
d. Label and segregate all HM from nonhazardous items.
e. Make special indications for any materials that have shelf life considerations.
f. Consider alternative, nonhazardous substitutes whenever processing a request for HM. Check
with the installation’s environmental office for suggestions.
6. POL Storage Areas.
a. Store all POL products with secondary containment. Construct berms 1 1/2 times the volume of
the largest container (“must contain the contents of the single largest tank plus sufficient freeboard for
precipitation”) stored in the storage area to preclude spillage outside the immediate area. Obtain
exceptions to this policy from the installation’s environmental office.
C-8
b. Store all HM in a location protected from the elements to maintain container integrity (to
prevent rusting, protect labels from fading, and so forth).
c. Inspect containers and labels weekly for leaks and incomplete/unreadable or out-of-date
labels. Stop leaks in containers (overpack the container or place the contents in a nonleaking
container.) Maintain legible labels to reflect actual container contents.
d. Maintain an inventory of POL products. Keep MSDSs on hand for any HM present.
e. Use POL and other HM stock on a FIFO basis.
f. Do not tip a drum on its side to issue POL products outside the POL storage area. Use
transfer pumps (preferred method) for dispensing POL products.
g. Place a drip box or pan under the supply valve when drum is tipped on its side. Line boxes
and pans with absorbent pads and maintain on a regular basis. Clean up spillage immediately
using dry sweep in areas with concrete floors.
h. Immediately report to the unit’s ECO and the appropriate installation officials spills of any
quantity that enter the environment (soil, water, or drain). (See Tab A.)
i. Keep used oil free of contamination (water, dry sweep, hardware, trash, solvent, antifreeze),
and store only in approved used oil above-ground storage tanks.
j. Use separate containers to store used brake fluid, solvents, hydraulic, and transmission oils.
(Should mixing of waste streams occur, the product becomes “waste contaminated with an
unknown substance” and will require analysis by the DRMO before disposal.)
k. Contact DRMO for pumping or turn-in, whichever applies, when used oil tanks/barrels are
3/4 full. (Units may be required to go through the installation’s EMO which will, in turn, contact
the DRMO.)
l. Discontinue accumulation of used oils if leaks in storage containers are detected.

Immediately report leaks to the unit ECO and the installation EMO.
m. Obtain approved containers from the DRMO for proper disposal of contaminated dry sweep
and other accumulated HW. Clearly mark containers for proper waste disposal.
n. Dispose of used filters for oil, transmission, and fuel as normal trash after draining for 24
hours and double bagging in plastic. (Units/installations should investigate equipment for
pressing oil from filters and then recycling the metal.)
o. Permanently close all floor drains in maintenance areas where HM/HW are handled or
stored and provide for secondary containment single wall containers. Do not store HM near
sanitary or storm sewer drains. Immediately report any amount of POL spillage entering a floor
or storm drain to the unit’s ECO and the installation’s EMO.
C-9
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
p. Place each HM container of five gallons or more accumulation capacity in a POL shed or portable
secondary containment device. (If these storage means are not available, the storage area will be
bermed to contain 1 1/2 times the largest container volume in the event of a spill.)
7. Fuel Dispensing and Storage Area.
a. Two personnel perform the operation when filling any size container with fuel—one will run the
pump, and the other will dispense the fuel. This procedure provides adequate manpower, to monitor
the pump for leaks and shut off the pump in case of an emergency. It also prevents overfilling the
container.
b. Handle fuel contaminated with dirt and water as HW, and dispose through the DRMO.
c. Dispose of oil-contaminated fuel as a result of fuel cell leaks or other mechanical system failure,
as HW through DRMO.
d. Contact the direct support unit for assistance and guidance if tankers or fuel pods must be
purged.
8. Procedures for Accumulation Site.
Provide accumulation sites for used petroleum products and HW. Place sites above ground on a
nonpermeable, bermed hard stand, label them; and locate them 50 feet or more from any building.
Leaking, corroded, or otherwise deteriorated containers must be overpacked in DOT approved drums.
Coordinate with the installation EMO for assistance in determining the appropriate overpack containers,
labeling/marking requirements, arranging for pick up of used oil, and other HW/HM collection issues.
a. Keep an accumulation log for each used oil or HW container in use. Specify as follows:
(1) Contents.
(2) Date the container was opened.
(3) Date and quantity of each addition to the container.
(4) Name of person adding to the container.
(5) Date container is filled or closed.
(6) Date the container is removed by DRMO.
b. Store used oil and HW according to installation guidelines.
(1) Place all accumulation of HW on a nonpermeable bermed hard stand.
(2) Label and locate the stand 50 feet or more from any building.
(3) Protect the accumulated HW from the elements, including heat and cold.
C-10
(4) Provide an enclosure to keep containers free from obscuring snow cover to allow for
routine visual inspections in areas prone to heavy snowfall.
(5) Store used greases, solvents, brake fluids, hydraulic fluid, motor oil, and antifreeze in
separate containers.
(6) Keep containers (drums, cans, or tanks) closed, except when depositing waste, as a
safeguard against spills and to prevent water from entering the containers.
(7) Obtain a replacement through the prescribed load list (PLL) section or the troop support
office if 2 ½- or 2 ¾-inch threaded caps on 55-gallon drums are missing.
(8) Ensure that secondary containment is provided which is capable of containing 1½ times
the volume of the largest container stored in the storage area.
(9) Do not accumulate HW in an open container; it is a serious violation of HW regulations.
c. Leave the following headspace to prevent overflow due to expansion:
55-gallon drum................................ 3 to 4 inches.
5-gallon cans .................................. 1.5 to 2 inches.
1-gallon can ................................... 1 inch.
d. Dispose of used oil in an appropriate above-ground container.
(1) Label the storage tank(s) USED OIL ONLY (by type such as motor oil, transmission oil, or
hydraulic oil), and make certain personnel are trained to place only used oil in the tanks. If a
55-gallon drum is needed, use national stock number (NSN) 8110-00-823-8121.
(2) Ensure that waste-oil tanks are pumped on a regular schedule. Notify the motor sergeant
or the unit’s HM/HW coordinator if the tank fills up before the scheduled pick up date or the
tank is not pumped on schedule.
e. Use vermiculite (NSN 7930-00-269-1272) or absorbent pads to soak up puddles, and Safestep
(NSN 7930-01-145-5797) or sawdust (NSN 7930-00-633-9849) to clean up hard stands if HM or HW
is spilled. Place all contaminated soil and absorbent material in removable head drum(s) (NSN
8110-00-082-2626 or 8110-00-292-8121) and turn in to the DRMO. Notify the installation’s
environmental office (see Tab A).
f. Overpack chemical products and POL contained in leaking, corroded, or otherwise deteriorated
containers in approved drums, and dispose of them as HW through the DRMO. Contact the
installation’s environmental office for assistance in determining the appropriate overpack containers.
(1) To be accepted for turn-in, waste material must be in a safe, nonleaking, durable
container.
C-11
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
(a) Overpack leaking containers in steel or plastic removable head overpack drums,
available through the supply system.
(b) Pack leaking containers of liquids in absorbent material (NSN 7930-00-269-1272),

available at the General Services Administration (GSA) store or through GSA or DLA
catalogs.
(c) Overpack a leaking 55-gallon drum in an 85-gallon drum. Place an absorbent

material all around a leaking, overpacked container, to include underneath the container
and with the maximum amount possible placed in the space between the overpack
container and leaking container. There must be 6 inches of absorbent on the bottom and
top of the interior container, with at least 2 inches around the sides (adjust for different
sized drums and overpacks).
(d) Overpack leaking containers of nonliquid HW in a serviceable container. Call the

installation’s environmental office or the DRMO when in doubt as to the type of container
to use since many liquids such as battery acid cannot be packed in steel containers.
(2) Contact the installation’s environmental office for a loaner if drums are not available for
overpacking an emergency spill. Requisition a replacement drum for the installation’s
environmental office. Used drums are frequently available at the DRMO. Removable head 55-
gallon drums (NSN 8110-00-082-2626) should be stocked by installation supply. Ensure that
spill kits are procured for handling future spills.
(3) Request assistance from the installation’s environmental office on compatibility of waste,
packing, and labeling of containers. Maintain this information in the waste-stream file for each
waste.
g. Inspect HW weekly. Document results of the inspection on a log and make accessible to state
and federal inspectors. Identify description of waste, location, quantity, date accumulation started, end
of 90-day period, date removed to the DRMO or by contractor, remarks (condition of storage area and
containers), inspector's printed name, signature, and date of inspection. Coordinate this action with
the installation’s environmental office.
9. Vehicle Parking Areas.
a. Park vehicles only in designated parking areas.
b. Do not discharge any POL product or contaminated soil into or near a storm drain. This is
forbidden. Vehicle parking areas drain into storm sewers; storm sewers drain into streams, which lead
into the nearest surface-water body.
c. Place drip boxes/pans under all drip points of vehicles with potential for leaking POL.
d. Use dry sweep to clean up POL spills where vehicles are parked, and dispose as HW through the
DRMO.
e. Do not wash vehicles on the vehicle parking line. Wash according to paragraph 4 of this SOP.
C-12
f. Ensure that no vehicle leaves the motor pool if it leaves a visible, continuous, or intermittent trail of
POL on the ground (Class 3 leak).
10. Disposal of Empty Containers and Hazardous Items. Include information on turn-in of mufflers and
exhaust pipes, brake shoes and clutch plates, fuel tanks, aerosol cans, PCB capacitor and transformers,
hydraulic rams and gas cylinders, shock absorbers, oil- saturated wood and pallets, paint and paint
containers, solvents and thinners, oils and greases, antifreeze, oily rags, sweeping compound, oil and fuel
filters, washrack soil/sand residue, spill clean up debris and residue, and products with expiration dates.
a. Turn-in procedures. The procedures for turning in HM varies widely due to differing state and local
requirements. Seek the assistance of the supporting installation and DRMO, and should information on
filling out and processing the turn-in document.
b. Transport. Transportation of HW is strictly controlled. Check with the supporting installation and
DRMO to determine if transport by the unit is allowed.
11. Refueling Operations.
a. General.
(1) Conduct tactical refueling operations at a designated logistics resupply point (LRP).
(2) Avoid conducting refueling operations in a unit’s AO due to the safety hazards associated with
maneuvering a fuel tanker or heavy expanded mobile tactical truck (HEMTT) and conducting
grounding operations at each vehicle.
(3) Ensure that POL section personnel conduct the actual refueling whenever possible.
b. Secondary containment.
(1) Place secondary containment (large drip pans) under the vehicle and under the fuel hoses
during refueling operations.
(2) Place 5-gallon fuel cans inside drip pan when refueling, for secondary containment,
preventing small volume fuel spills from accumulating and contaminating the soil.
(3) Transfer spilled fuel to a labeled 5-gallon waste-fuel container, and dispose as HW.
c. Emergency equipment.
(1) Fire fighting. Supply each refueling vehicle with a minimum of two fire extinguishers. Set up
fire extinguishers on each side of the tanker or HEMTT during refuel operations to expedite
emergency response measures. Ensure vehicles have their basic issue inventory (BII) items.
C-13
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
(2) Emergency eyewash. Ensure that potable water is readily available for emergency eye
washing to provide first aid measures on-site in the event a spill or leak occurs during refueling
operations.
(3) Personal Protective Equipment. Ensure that each refueling vehicle has two sets of PPE.
Reference the MSDS for required PPE, or reference paragraph 4 at the beginning of this SOP
for field-expedient PPE. Wear gloves and goggles when conducting refueling operations. Use
aprons or wet weather gear to respond to a spill or repair a leak. Ensure that this equipment is
available.
(4) Spill response. Ensure that a copy of the spill response plan is readily available during all
refueling operations.
12. Spills. (See Tab A for spill response plan. You should also refer to Graphic Training Aid [GTA] 5-8-3.)
a. Protect yourself and other personnel, stop the flow, and then contain the spill. Immediately contain
and report all spills that have entered or threaten to enter floor or storm drains.
b. Report all spills according to the ISCP. Reporting procedures and reportable quantities may vary
from installation to installation. The unit’s spill response team conducts clean up. Allow light fuel to
evaporate into the atmosphere; absorb oil with dry sweep or equivalent. (See Tab A.)
c. Report POL spills larger than one gallon of heavy oil or five gallons of fuel to the installation’s fire
department. (Check the ISCP for any differing local requirements.)
d. Conduct spill clean up per the spill response plan at Tab A. Additional cleanup guidance will be
provided when the spill is reported.
e. Maintain (on-hand) supplies and equipment (absorbent materials) appropriate for initial
containment of the types of spills possible in the unit. Refer to the MSDS associated with each
product, or call the HW material section of the DRMO for guidance on the necessary spill response
supplies to have on hand. Spill equipment and material will be similar to that contained in Tab B.
SECTION 2 - SUPPLY
1. Requisitioning. Check with the installation’s environmental office for an up-to-date list of HM and
guidance on the Army’s HSMS. The HSMS, with its centralized management and strict inventory control, will
reduce the use and disposal of hazardous substances.
a. Requisition the minimum quantity required for mission accomplishment.
b. When processing a request for an HM, consider alternative, nonhazardous substitutes. Check with
the installation’s environmental office for suggestions.
c. Ensure that recoverability codes are used whenever applicable.
d. Special indications will be made for any materials that have shelf life considerations.
C-14
2. Storage.
a. Label and segregate all HM from nonhazardous items.
b. Keep a copy of the applicable MSDS for each HM on hand in a binder in the HM supply storage
area.
3. Turn-In/Disposal. Check with the supporting installation and DRMO for local requirements for turn-in of
HW and unused HM.
a. Keep an accumulation log for each HW that is awaiting turn-in to DRMO. Identify the date each
container was opened, date and quantity of each addition to the container, name of the person adding
to the container, date container is filled or closed, and date of turn-in to DRMO.
b. Keep turn-in documents for HM and HW on file for two years. Keep HW manifests on file for fifty
years.
4. Paint.
a. Do not open more than one can of each color of paint at any time.
b. Store paints indoors in a non-flammable material locker or in a POL shed. Store paints by
compatibility.
c. Keep paint in original, labeled containers.
d. Maintain an MSDS in the paint locker for each type of paint stored.
e. Turn in any unopened, reusable, excess, or no longer needed paint products to the appropriate
material management support activity, for redistribution or sale.
f. Store all waste paint and thinners/solvents separate from unused or good paint products.
g. Consult the installation EMO and chain of command for proper disposal of all paint.
h. Store and dispose of paint thinners (HM) as directed by the environmental office and the DRMO.
5. Batteries.
a. Exchange batteries on a one-for-one basis.
b. Store used batteries separately by type while awaiting turn-in; accompany with an accumulation
log. Coordinate with your local installation EMO to confirm proper labeling requirements.
c. Ensure that there are no leaking batteries; handle carefully, and place leaking batteries in
appropriate containers.
d. Keep turn-in documents on file for a period of two years.
C-15
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
SECTION 3 - NBC
1. Requisitioning, Storage, and Disposal/Turn-In. (See Section 2.)
a. Process all requisitions and turn-ins through unit supply.
b. Keep a copy of the applicable MSDS for each HM on hand in a binder in the storage area.
c. Store DS2 and STB containers in dry and well-ventilated separate locations.
d. Check daily DS2 and STB containers for leaks or corrosion.
e. Overpack and turn in to DRMO any DS2 or STB container found to be leaking.
f. Properly dispose of out-of-date chemical agent testing kits as HW.
SECTION 4 - COMMUNICATION
1. Requisitioning, Storage, and Disposal/Turn-In. (See Section 2.)
2. Batteries.
a. Issue batteries by exchanging them with used batteries on a one-for-one basis.
b. Immediately turn in used batteries to unit supply for storage while awaiting turn-in to DRMO.
SECTION 5 - FIELD-MESS OPERATIONS
Field-mess personnel use M-2 burners that operate on motor gasoline (MOGAS) during field and
contingency operations. The major safety and environmental issues are fuel storage, filling, and lighting
operations.
1. Fuel Storage.
a. Store 5-gallon fuel cans closed at all times.
b. Do not attach open funnels or tubes to the containers. Maintain containers in good condition.
c. Do not use rusty or residue-covered containers. They are unsafe and unacceptable.
2. Filling operations.
a. Conduct filling operations on a tarp or plastic liner with a soil berm or sandbag perimeter for
secondary containment in the event of a spill.
b. Immediately collect spilled fuel using an absorbent material.
C-16
c. Place used absorbent material in DOT-approved containers, and dispose of as HW.
3. Lighting operations.
a. Conduct lighting operations at least 50 feet away from fuel storage and M-2 burner filling
operations.
b. Conduct lighting operations on open soil so that any residual fuel will freely burn during the
operation.
SECTION 6 - OPERATIONS/TRAINING
1. Training.
a. Provide initial environmental-awareness training to all personnel within 90 days of assignment
and annually thereafter.
b. Train all personnel to accomplish their tasks according to laws and regulations and to respond
properly in emergencies.
c. Train all personnel that have contact with HM or HW within 90 days of assignment and annually
thereafter. Ensure that personnel who have not yet received initial environmental training are
properly supervised when they work with materials potentially hazardous to themselves or the
environment.
d. Document all environmental training and keep on file in the operations/training office.
e. Identify quarterly requirements for ECO training. Request training allocations from the
installation’s EMO for two personnel (primary and alternate) in the installation’s ECO course.
Request an additional training allocation when either ECO is within 90 days of departure.
2. Risk Assessment.
a. Complete an environmental-related risk assessment for all field training of platoon size or
larger. (See Chapter 2 and Appendixes F and G.)
b. Use checklists, found in Appendix E, for long-range, short-range and near-term planning,
training execution, and training evaluation as an aid in minimizing negative environmental impacts
for those areas found to have high risk.
3. Maneuver Damage.
a. Designate a maneuver damage control officer for each field training exercise (FTX).
b. Incorporate maneuver damage considerations into the OPORD for each FTX.
c. Brief unit personnel on maneuver damage considerations and minimization measures before
each exercise.
d. Include maneuver damage as a discussion topic at all AARs.
C-17
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
Tabs:
A. Spill Response Plan.
B. Spill Equipment and Materials.
C. Electronic Message Report Formats.
D. Field Procedures.
E. POCs for Assistance.
C-18
TAB A – SPILL RESPONSE PLAN
1. Immediate Action. A spill is defined as any quantity of petroleum product over five gallons (or according
to local laws since some states are more stringent than five gallons) or any quantity of any other HW. Should
a spill occur, the immediate actions are as follows:
a. Protect yourself and other personnel.
(1) Evacuate the area, if necessary, due to the type of spill.
(2) Take personal precautions as detailed on the MSDS for the material spilled.
(3) Use the proper PPE.
(4) Extinguish smoking materials and all sources of ignition.
(5) Turn off power if there is the possibility of fire.
(6) Ventilate the area.
b. Stop the flow (do it safely).
(1) Shut off valves, turn drums upright, and other procedures that will stop the flow, if possible.
(2) Do not take unnecessary chances, but stop the flow if it is possible without injury or
contamination.
(3) Shower and change clothes as soon as possible if HW contamination occurs.
c. Contain the spill (quickly and safely).
(1) Contain the spill by throwing absorbent, floor sweep, or dirt on it.
(2) Make dams to keep the spill from spreading further, and do not let it enter storm or sewer
drains, or other water ways.
(3) Divert the flow to prevent the spill from entering any water source, including drains, if
containment is not possible.
d. Report the spill immediately.
(1) Report the spill to the supervisor/superior.
(2) Sound the alarm or give verbal warning.
(3) Have another person call the installation’s fire department while you continuing to assess
the size and severity of the spill.
(4) Immediately report to the unit ECO or the installation’s environmental office spills of any HM
other than a petroleum product, regardless of quantity.
Figure C-2. Tab A – Spill-response plan to unit environmental SOP
C-19
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
(5) The senior person in charge makes a copy of the pertinent MSDS for emergency response
personnel in the event of a reportable spill.
e. Clean up the spill.
(1) Scoop up contaminated material and put it in a container. Mark the container with
“Hazardous Waste, Contaminated Absorbent (Dirt)” if the spill occurred on concrete or asphalt
and the spill was cleaned up with absorbent or dirt.
(2) Check with unit supply sergeant or the DRMO for proper disposal.
f. Replace spill equipment.
(1) Immediately after a spill is cleaned up, the spill response team’s noncommissioned officer in
charge (NCOIC) will account for all tools and supplies. The NCOIC will order replacement
consumables (sweeping compound and rags) from unit supply. He will also identify missing
property and initiate appropriate action (statement of charges or report of survey) to maintain
accountability.
(2) The spill response team’s NCOIC will ensure that spill kit inventories are complete before
resealing the drums.
g. Maintain POC list for assistance (listed by office, name, telephone number, and building).
(1) Fire department.
(2) Installation’s EMO.
(3) Unit’s ECO.
2. Response and Clean Up Instructions.
a. Take the immediate actions in paragraph 1 above.
b. Ensure that any PPE specified in the MSDS is properly used.
c. Transfer the fluid to a serviceable container if the container is still leaking fluid.
d. Absorb the remaining spilled liquid with absorbent material. Use only the amount necessary to
absorb the spill. Take remedial action if the spill is too large while waiting for the fire department.
e. Clean up the material with a nonsparking shovel or broom and place the residue in a serviceable
container with a secure lid.
f. Label the container.
(1) Label the container—“POL SPILL RESIDUE”—for fuel, oil, or hydraulic fluid spills.
Figure C-2. Tab A – Spill-response plan to unit environmental SOP (continued)
C-20
(2) Label the container—“(Name of Chemical) SPILL RESIDUE - FLAMMABLE”—for

flammable liquid spills (including solvents, paints, paint thinners, and alcohol).
(3) Label the container—“(Name of Acid) SPILL RESIDUE - ACID”—for acid spills.
g. Store the container in the HW storage area while awaiting turn-in.
h. Turn in the residue container to the DRMO.
Figure C-2. Tab A – Spill-response plan to unit environmental SOP (continued)
C-21
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
TAB B – SPILL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS
Each unit/activity should maintain a spill kit to respond to accidental releases and spills of HM. Below
is a list of recommended equipment that should be maintained in the unit/activity spill kit. This list is
not all-inclusive and should be expanded depending on the mission of the unit/activity. It is the
responsibility of the unit/activity to purchase replacement or additional items to keep the contents of
the kit stocked with necessary equipment. Additional kits must be purchased by the unit/activity that
needs them, and additional quantities will be based on the likely size or frequency of potential spills.
Hazardous Material/Hazardous Waste Supplies
Containers (DOT or equivalent)
NSN ITEM
8105-00-848-9631 Bag, polyolefin, 5 millimeters, 36 x 54 inch
8125-00-174-0852 Bottle, plastic, 1 gallon (polyethylene)
8125-00-731-6016 13 gallon
8125-00-888-7069 5 gallon
8110-00-254-5719 Drum, steel, 1 gallon*
8100-00-128-6819 1-gallon steel drum (17C)*
8110-00-254-5722 4-gallon steel drum*
8110-00-254-5713 Drum, steel, 6 gallon (w/ring)*
8110-01-204-8967 Pail, shipping, steel, 5 gallon (DOT 17C)*
8110-00-519-5618 Drum, steel, 10 gallon (DOT 17C)*
8110-00-030-7779 30-gallon steel drum*
8110-00-823-8121 55-gallon steel drum (17M)*
8110-00-030-9783 Drum, steel 55 gallon (bung & vent) (DOT 17E)*
8110-01-282-7615 Drum, polyethylene, 55 gallon*
8110-01-101-4055 85-gallon steel disposal drum (no lining)*
8110-01-101-4056 85-gallon steel recovery drum (epoxy phenolic lining)*
8110-01-101-4055 Drum, hazardous material*
* Refers to open top containers

For bung container refer to federal logistics (FEDLOG) or contract the G-4
Figure C-3. Tab B – Spill equipment and materials to unit environmental SOP
C-22
Absorbent
NSN ITEM
7930-00-269-1272 Clay, ground unit of issue (UI-bag)
1939-01-154-7001 Nonskid absorbent (UI-40 bag skid)
5640-00-801-4176 Insulation, thermal, vermiculite (UI-bag) (packing material)
4235-01-423-1466 4 each 1 cubic foot bag
4235-01-423-0711 1 each 1 cubic foot bag
4235-01-423-1463 30 each 18 x 18 inch pillows
4235-01-423-1467 20 each 2 inch x 10 foot sock
4235-01-423-1465 10 each 4 inch x 8 foot booms
4235-01-423-2787 10 inch x 10 foot booms
Spill Prevention
NSN ITEM
8135-00-579-6491 Plastic sheet, clear
8135-00-579-6492 Plastic sheet, black
4235-01-423-7214 Spill kit
4235-01-423-7221 Spill kit
Figure C-3. Tab B – Spill equipment and materials to unit environmental SOP (continued)
C-23
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
TAB C – ELECTRONIC MESSAGE REPORT FORMATS
References: FM 101-5-2, “US Army Reports and Message Formats,” 29 June 1999.
1. ( ) ECR Format.
TITLE: ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION REPORT (ECR)

REPORT NUMBER: E035
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS: Used to send periodic information (interim snapshots) of the environmental
status of specific sites (assembly areas, base camps, logistical support areas, and medical facilities) where
hazards are likely to occur and can result in significant, immediate and/or long-term effects on the natural
environment and/or health of friendly forces and noncombatants. Sent in accordance with unit SOP and
commander’s direction.
LINE 1—DATE AND TIME ________________________________ (DTG)

LINE 2—UNIT__________________________________________ (Unit making report)
LINE 3—LOCATION_____________________________________ (UTM or six-digit grid coordinate with
MGRS grid zone designator of
site/incident)
LINE 4—DESCRIPTION _________________________________ (Description of site/incident)
LINE 5—CHANGES _____________________________________ (Changes from last ECR or EBS)
LINE 6—HAZARDS _____________________________________ (Hazards to natural environment, friendly
forces, and/or civilian personnel)
LINE 7—ACTIONS ______________________________________ (Summary of actions to minimize
hazards/remedial effects)
LINE 8—UNIT POC _____________________________________ (Reporting unit point of contact)
LINE 9—ASSISTANCE __________________________________ (Assistance required/requested)
LINE 10—REFERENCE__________________________________ (Site specific EBS, if required)
LINE 12—AUTHENTICATION _____________________________ (Report authentication)
Figure C-4. Tab C – Electronic message report formats to unit environmental SOP
C-24
2. ( ) Electronic Spill Report Message Format.
TITLE: SPILL REPORT (SPILLREP)

REPORT NUMBER: S055
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS: Used to send timely information or status of an oil, hazardous material, or
hazardous waste spill that could have immediate environmental and/or health effects. Sent in accordance
with SOP and commander’s direction. NOTE: Spill reporting and reportable quantities are mandated by
federal and local law.
LINE 1—DATE AND TIME _______________________________ (DTG)

LINE 2—UNIT _________________________________________ (Unit making report)
LINE 3—DATE/TIME____________________________________ (DTG of spill discovery)
LINE 4—MATERIAL ____________________________________ (Material spilled)
LINE 5—QUANTITY ____________________________________ (Quantity of spilled material)
LINE 6—LOCATION ____________________________________ (UTM or six-digit grid coordinate with
MGRS grid zone designator of spill)
LINE 7—CAUSE _______________________________________ (Cause and supervising unit)
LINE 8—SIZE _________________________________________ (Size of affected area)
LINE 9—DAMAGE _____________________________________ (Damage to the natural environment, if
required)
LINE 10—HAZARDS____________________________________ (Hazards to natural environment, friendly
forces, and/or civilian personnel)
LINE 11—ACTIONS ____________________________________ (Summary of actions taken)
LINE 12—UNIT POC____________________________________ (Supervising unit POC)
LINE 13—ASSISTANCE _________________________________ (Assistance required/requested)
LINE 15—AUTHENTICATION ____________________________ (Report authentication)
Figure C-4. Tab C – Electronic message report formats to unit environmental SOP (continued)
C-25
Appendix D
Sources of Environmental Assistance

Trained professionals are available within each unit, organization, or
installation. Should soldiers, Marines, or their leaders require additional
information or assistance, they must seek help immediately. In general, a
POC should be located at the installation’s environmental office, normally
a part of the DPW at Army installations, the facilities or base engineer
office on Marine Corps installations, or the STARC for the NG. Additional
assistance is available from the DOL (Army) or the G4 (Marine Corps), the
safety office, and the supporting DRMO. Within the chain of command,
the key personnel are the ECO and the HW coordinator. These personnel
are found at company level and above. Since these duties are performed
as an additional duty at company and battalion levels, the responsible
personnel may be in any of a variety of offices. This appendix contains
additional POCs that may be useful.
BASOPS/SUPPORTING INSTALLATION STAFF ASSISTANCE
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT OFFICE
The EMO is staffed with scientists and engineers responsible for developing
and implementing the installation’s environmental programs. This office is
usually a division within the installation DPW for the Army, the Directorate
of Engineering for the USMC, or the Facilities Management Office (FMO) of
the STARC for the NG. The installation’s environmental program includes
the following five general components, and many EMOs are organized
accordingly:
• Compliance elements monitor current operations, and ensure that

units follow environmental guidelines.
• Pollution prevention elements manage installation initiatives such as

source reduction, HW minimization, recycling, and materials
substitution.
• Natural and cultural resources management elements manage

installation conservation initiatives for forests, wildlife, wetlands, and
historical resources.
• Restoration elements manage clean up of contamination sites on the

installation.
D-0
• Planning and documentation elements address possible

environmental impacts of future operations and activities.
DIRECTORATE OF LOGISTICS/G4
Responsibilities of Army DOLs/G4s, or Marine Corps G4s, include

management of POL and HM. The directorate/staff section also exercises
environmental control and oversight of HM (including ammunition)
maintenance, transportation, and storage activities.
DIRECTORATE OF PLANS, TRAINING, AND MOBILIZATION/G3
Responsibilities of Army DPTMs/G3s, or Marine Corps G3s, include

installation/unit operations and training. These offices coordinate all
training activities, including budgeting, development and maintenance of
training areas, the ITAM program, and mission priorities. The DPTM also
coordinates the range division and has overall responsibility for range
operations, maintenance, and construction.
STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE
The SJA provides legal advice and assistance in the interpretation and
application of environmental laws and rules to installation activities. This
process/serviceis particularly important when assessing the environmental
impact of a new initiative (such as construction).
PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICER/G5
The PAO is the official spokesperson for the installation/unit and manages
public involvement activities and responses (particularly during public
controversy) in close coordination with other key installation/unit members.
This is particularly important when assessing the environmental impact of a
new initiative (such as construction).
OCCUPATIONAL AND SAFETY HEALTH OFFICE
OSHA works closely with the environmental staff on programs to help

prevent accidents that could threaten or damage human health and the
environment. Hazard communication, MSDSs, and OSHA-mandated
training are the purview of the safety office.
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE OFFICE/SURGEON
The preventive medicine office is the POC for the medical monitoring
program and work-related health problems. This office, often co-located with
medical units or hospitals, can provide critical information concerning public
health issues, such as the use of pesticides.
D-1
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
FIRE DEPARTMENT
The fire department provides fire fighting and spill response support to the
installation. In many instances, the fire department will have highly trained
spill response personnel who provide expert advice on spill reaction
measures.
DEFENSE REUTILIZATION AND MARKETING OFFICE
The DRMO works closely with DPW and DOL to store and provide for
disposal of solid waste, including HW generated at the installation.
This DOD organization becomes critical to units attempting to turn in

potentially hazardous substances or HM. Unit personnel having questions on
turn-in procedures for potentially hazardous substances or HM should check
with the receiving DRMO facility to determine documentation and packaging
requirements.
SOURCES OF ASSISTANCE DURING TACTICAL OPERATIONS
While units may be able to benefit from the assistance of standard

installation or BASOPS support during tactical operations, the likelihood is
that they will only be minor, perhaps supporting players to provide
assistance. Tactical operations will shift more support requirements to
operational staffs rather than installation staff support. Identified below are
some of those likely/potential sources of assistance.
OPERATIONAL/DEPLOYMENT STAFF ASSISTANCE
The unit staff takes on a much larger role in environmental assistance when
a unit is deployed or in an operational status. The load will tend to rest on
these staffs (see Chapter 1 for a discussion of unit staff responsibilities) in the
cases of deployment to relatively remote, OCONUS locations. As time goes
on and the duration of stay increases, it is very likely that the command will
establish organizations like the BCCA and its subordinate BCAT. These
organizations will provide tactical/operational commanders with the military
environmental protection support they need.
BCCA AND BCAT
These two organizations have become de facto doctrinal organizations to

support the needs of the commander when units are deployed outside of
established locations throughout the world. The concept was developed and
successfully tested by United States Army Europe (USAREUR). These
organizations perform an important and vital role that essentially replaces
the roles performed by installation staffs, but in a tactical/operational arena.
They may draw on resources from either home base or theater installation
sources, but they are tactical/operational locations such as base camps
(which they typically support) and are not installations, but
tactical/operational sites. See CALL Newsletter 99-9, Integrating Military
Environmental Protection, for insights into how these organizations provide
assistance in a tactical/operational setting.
D-2
JOINT ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT BOARD (JEMB)
Operational or tactical Army or Marine Corps units may operate in the

theater or as part of a joint task force and be required to interface with the
actions of a temporary board, the JEMB, that the joint commander or his
designated CJTF may activate. The JEMB establishes policies, procedures,
priorities, and the overall direction for environmental management
requirements in the theater according to overseas baseline environmental
guidance and/or the final governing standards in effect for the countries
within the AOR. If appropriate, the board may assume responsibility for the
preparation of the environmental management support plan. The JEMB is
spelled out in JP 3-34.
HOST NATION (HN)
Depending on the capabilities of the HN and agreements that have been

made, HN support to the tactical/operational commander is possible. Senior
level staffs will typically be the ones to initiate and secure this type of
support.
CONTRACTOR SUPPORT
Environmental support assistance for the tactical/operational commander

may be provided by a contractor. This type of contracting has already
occurred in places like Bosnia. Coordination for this support will likely come
through the BCCA, the US Army Corps of Engineers, or a similar agency
with contracting capability.
CENTER FOR ARMY LESSONS LEARNED (CALL) DATABASE
The database at the CALL is beginning to add data that supports the needs of
the commander in the area of military environmental protection. A host of
lessons learned and examples of other units’ actions/experiences are
becoming available for use.
Web site: http://call.army.mil/call.html.
OTHER SOURCES OF ASSISTANCE
Regardless of your location there are a series of sources of assistance that are
available to you if you have the ability to phone or contact them by e-mail, or
other electronic means. Others can be easily identified through the use of the
Defense Environmental Network and Information Exchange (DENIX)
website.
MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL HOME PAGE
Web site: http://www.usmc.mil/environmental.
D-3
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK AND INFORMATION EXCHANGE (DENIX)
Operated by DOD, this website is sponsored by the Department of Environmental

Security Corporate Information Management.
It provides timely access to environmental legislative compliance, restoration,

clean up and DOD guidance information.
• Web site: http://ww.denix.osd.mil/
D-4
Appendix E
Environmental Planning Guidelines

This appendix provides guidelines for units to integrate environmental
concerns into all phases of operations planning and activities. Unit
leaders must consider the environmental impact of unit actions and plan
to eliminate or minimize negative effects. These guidelines should be
reviewed with installation environmental offices and operational staffs.
Once supplemented with state, local, federal, or HN environmental
requirements, these guidelines serve as a tool to assist unit leaders in
integrating environmental considerations into unit operations.
PRE-OPERATIONS GUIDELINES
GENERAL
• Include environment considerations in the METT-TC process.
• Include forecasted weather considerations in planned training.
• Include alternative missions in case environmental conditions or

considerations change.
OPERATIONS PREPARATION
• Review the OPLAN/OPORD for environmental requirements and/or

considerations.
• Ensure a recent environmental risk assessment has been performed.
• Confirm coordination with the installation and operational staffs

concerning applicable environmental laws, regulations, and
considerations.
• Determine whether a recent site reconnaissance has been performed.
• Conduct rehearsals to ensure that all safety and environmental

considerations are satisfied.
• Review the environmental protection portion of the unit's SOP, especially

the areas concerning spill response and reporting.
• Make provisions for handling medical wastes.
E-1
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
OPERATIONS PREPARATION (CONTINUED)
• Make provisions for handling human and solid wastes.
• Check to ensure HM (explosives/POL) are properly labeled and that an

MSDS is on hand for each substance before transporting.
• Have tools, equipment, and materials available to respond to

environmental emergencies.
• Ensure personnel designated for the spill response team(s) are properly
trained and aware of their assignment.
• Ensure team members are aware of the procedure for requesting

additional spill assistance, if required.
AREA OF OPERATION
• Review previous AARs for environmental lessons learned concerning the

AOs and mission type. Plan preventive measures.
• Obtain land use permits, range clearances, and any other unique
requirements.
• During the site reconnaissance verify areas of environmental concern.
• Ensure coordination has been made to perform an EBS.
PERSONNEL PREPARATION
• Ensure soldiers/Marines understand their responsibilities in reducing

generation of HW and minimizing damage to the environment.
• Brief all soldiers/Marines on range or maneuver restrictions; endangered

species; vegetation use; and archaeological, cultural, and historic
resources considerations.
• During planning discuss the identified environmental risks.
CHAIN OF COMMAND
• Appoint and train an ECO and an alternate, and involve them in

planning.
• Brief the plan to the next higher commander and the operations officer.
• Review the risk assessment and have it approved by the appropriate

commander.
E-2
GUIDELINES DURING OPERATIONS
GENERAL
• Forward the EBS to higher HQ after it has been performed.
• Ensure all unit personnel comply with "off-limits" area restrictions.
• Verify units dig (fighting positions, tank ditches) only in approved areas.
• Ensure all soldiers/Marines know and comply with special environmental

requirements.
• Use downtime for conducting opportunity training on environmental

concerns.
• Ensure leaders monitor high risk operations and activities.
• Report spills and maneuver damage to the appropriate HQ immediately.
• Verify leaders are making on-the-spot corrections.
• Conduct periodic ECRs as necessary and pass them to the appropriate

HQ in a timely fashion.
NOISE REDUCTION
• Ensure leaders are explaining and marking noise restricted areas.
• Ensure units are complying with community/installation noise abatement

hours.
MINIMIZING VEHICLE MOVEMENT DAMAGE
• Ensure personnel drive vehicles on secondary roads and bypasses

whenever possible to minimize off-road damage.
• Ensure personnel move vehicles into bivouac or assembly areas in

columns.
• Designate personnel to remove mud and debris from roadways.
• Drive carefully in wooded areas to avoid vehicle damage to vegetation.
• Stay on marked trails and routes when driving off-road, minimizing

cross-country movement.
• Cross streams and ditches only at approved crossings.
WETLANDS (MARSHES, SWAMPS, BOGS)
• Obtain a special permit (if required) to train in wetland areas.
E-3
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
• Ensure sensitive and “off-limits” areas are designated, well marked, and
avoided.
• Limit the use of vehicles and other destructive activities whenever

possible.
• Ensure drivers use designated bridges and crossing sites.
• Ensure units observe prohibitions against discharging wastewater into

wetlands or waterways.
• Prohibit refueling or field maintenance operations near or in wetlands or

surface waters.
• Ensure units are observe prohibition against filling any wetlands areas.
THREATENED/ENDANGERED SPECIES AND OTHER PROTECTED WILDLIFE, VEGETATION AND

HABITAT
• Ensure soldiers/Marines exercise due care to avoid disturbing threatened

and endangered species, habitats, and sensitive areas.
• Verify sensitive areas are marked.
CULTURAL RESOURCES
• Ensure units avoid digging in or near sites or structures designated as

cultural resources.
• Verify soldiers/Marines follow instructions not to modify or destroy these

sites in any way.
• Confirm soldiers/Marines understand that destroying or defacing

archaeological sites, including collection of artifacts, is a violation of the
law.
• Ensure soldiers/Marines immediately report the discovery of any artifacts

and wait for clearance to resume training.
CAMOUFLAGE
• Ensure units exercise care to prevent ground covering from being

stripped of vegetation.
• Verify units are using camouflage nets instead of live vegetation,

whenever possible.
• Brief soldiers/Marines concerning the local guidance on the use of

vegetation for camouflage.
E-4
WASTE DISPOSAL
• Ensure each unit polices its area.
• Establish designated collection points for proper trash disposal.
• Dispose of field kitchen wastes only as authorized.
• Dispose of medical and human wastes in an approved manner.
• Verify units are disposing of liquid waste from kitchens, showers, and
baths correctly.
• Ensure units properly dispose of reverse osmosis water purification unit

(ROWPU) discharges.
HM AND HW HANDLING
• Comply with the installation EMO procedures for the turn-in and
disposal of HW.
• Obtain approval before using CS and smoke.
• Properly mark and report unexploded munitions.
• Minimize the use of hazardous chemicals.
• Place HW and POL waste products in separate containers.
• Deliver HW and POL waste products to a designated waste collection

point.
• Do not dump POL and vehicle maintenance waste products into sewers,
ditches, or streams.
• Have spill teams available on site.
• Confirm adequate spill response equipment and material is available.
• Ensure spill teams are responding immediately to reported spill locations.
• Report spills as required by local regulations and unit SOP.
REFUELING AND MAINTENANCE
• Refuel vehicles only at designated sites.
• Protect ground surfaces by using POL-drip pans.
• Use POL-absorbing compounds during refueling operations.
E-5
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
RECOVERY OPERATIONS
• Use only designated vehicle wash facilities and equipment.
• Confirm fighting positions, gun emplacements, and other excavated areas

are properly refilled.
• Collect communications and obstacle wires.
• Properly police and remove all wastes and recyclables (litter, ammo
brass).
• Mark and report unexploded munitions.
• Report, contain, and clean up hazardous spills according to directives.
• Inspect all sites before departing the AO.
• Perform a closure EBS to document the condition of the AO before

departure.
POST-OPERATIONS GUIDELINES
GENERAL
• Conduct AARs following each phase of the operation.
• Evaluate performance of environmental tasks.
• Identify weaknesses in performance of environmental tasks.
• Discuss compliance with environmental policies.
• Evaluate soldiers/Marines individual proficiency in following

environmental requirements.
• Develop a plan to train identified shortfalls.
E-6
Appendix F
Risk Management Worksheet

This risk management worksheet is a tool that leaders may use to track
and document risk. The worksheet (Figure F-1) provides a logical
starting point to track the process. Figure F-2, page F-2, provides
instructions for the worksheet. Planners use the worksheet to document
risk management steps taken during planning, preparation, and
execution of all training and combat missions and tasks. It is important
to remember that this form can be used to track all risk, not just
environmental-related risk. Appendix G provides a practical application
of documenting and tracking risk during an operation. Figure F-3, page
F-3, is a reproducible risk management worksheet.
A. Mission or Task: B. Date/Time Group C. Date Prepared:

Begin:
End:
D. Prepared By: (Rank, Last Name, Duty Position)
E. Task: F. Identify G. Assess H. Develop Controls: I. Determine J. Implement Controls

Hazards: Hazards: Residual (“How To”):
Risk:
K. Determine overall mission/task risk level after controls are implemented (circle
)
LOW (L) MODERATE (M) HIGH (H) EXTREMELY HIGH (E)
Figure F-1. Sample risk management worksheet
F-1
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
Worksheet Instructions
Block
A-E Self-explanatory.
F Identify Hazards - identify hazards by reviewing METT-TC factors for the
mission or task. Additional factors include historical lessons learned,
experience, judgment, equipment characteristics and warnings, and
environmental considerations.
G Assess Hazards - assessment includes historical lessons learned, intuitive
analyses, experience, judgment, equipment characteristics and warnings,
and environmental considerations. Determine initial risk for each hazard by
applying the risk assessment matrix Figure 2-12, page 2-25. Enter the risk
level for each hazard.
H Develop Controls - develop one or more controls for each hazard to either
eliminate the hazard or reduce the risk (probability and/or severity) of a
hazardous incident. Specify who, what, where, when, and how for each
control. Enter controls.
I Determine Residual Risk - determine the residual risk for each hazard by
applying the risk assessment matrix Figure 2-12, page 2-25. Enter the
residual risk level for each hazard.
J Implement Controls - decide how each control will be put into effect or
communicated to the personnel who will make it happen (written or verbal
instruction: tactical, safety, garrison SOPs, rehearsals). Enter controls.
K Determine Overall Mission/Task Risk - select the highest residual risk level
and circle it. This level becomes the overall mission or task risk level. The
commander decides whether the controls are sufficient to accept the residual
risk. If the risk is too great to continue the mission or task, the commander
directs development of additional controls or modifies, changes, or rejects
the COA.
Supervise and Evaluate - this last step is not on the worksheet. Plan how
each control will be monitored for implementation (continuous supervision,
spot checks), and reassess hazards as the situation changes. Determine if
the controls worked and if they can be improved. Communicate lessons
learned.
Figure F-2. Instructions for risk management worksheet
F-2
Begin:
End:

Risk:
Risk Management Worksheet

K. Determine overall mission/task risk level after controls are implemented (circle one):
Figure F-3. Risk management worksheet

F-3
Appendix G
Practical Application of Assessing Environmental-

Related Risk
This appendix provides a practical application of assessing environmental
-related risk. This exercise uses the five-step process of risk management
described in Chapter 4. This exercise also employs the risk management
worksheet to document and track risk. Although the following scenario
depicts a field training exercise (FTX), units use these procedures to
assess environmental-related risk during all operations. This scenario
concentrates specifically on environmental-related risk; however, these
risks are incorporated into the company’s overall risk management plan.
The 586th Assault Float Bridge (AFB) Company will conduct a five-day FTX in Anatuvak
training area of Camp Yukon. The unit will depart Fort Chilly and convoy 120 miles on limited
access highways. The commander has designated rest areas and tactical refueling points
along the route. The trip is expected to take 8 hours. Upon arrival at Camp Yukon, the unit
will move into the Anatuvak training area and set up a bivouac site, preceeded by their
quartering party. During the FTX, the company will conduct tactical bridging operations on
the Yukon River. The FTX will involve normal operations (12 to 16 hours a day), with some
night and limited visibility operations. The operations will include the use of pyrotechnics
and blank ammunition, but no live fire will be conducted. The area has hills, wetlands,
several winding streams, and one large river. The wetlands are identified and marked. The
forecasted weather will not adversely affect operations. The soldiers are somewhat familiar
with the terrain, which contains some identified and marked off archaeological sites. The
training area contains the habitat for two endangered species, which are marked and
posted. The unit will conduct unit maintenance, refueling, messing, shower, and field
sanitation operations within the bivouac site.
STEP 1. IDENTIFY (ENVIRONMENTAL) HAZARDS
To ensure risk management throughout the operation, the unit’s XO

(Lieutenant Young) conducted an operational analysis to break down the
exercise into events, allowing him to manage the risks for the various tasks.
He also identified particular tasks for the operation using the company’s
mission training plan (MTP). Figure G-1, page G-1 illustrates the unit’s
prepared operational analysis.
Leaders developed the hazard list using their experience, lessons learned,
unit SOPs, applicable references, and guidance from the chain of command.
The unit consulted Fort Chilly’s and Camp Yukon’s installation and
operational staffs to obtain more information on the environmental
considerations for the area of operations. They identified applicable
environmental standards, laws, and ROE that effected the mission.
G-0
Practical Application of Assessing Environmental-Related Risk
Company leaders annotated each task and associated environmental hazards

on the risk management worksheet in Figure G-2, page G-4, sections E and
F. For the purposes of this practical example, only the high profile tasks (2,
3, and 4) are detailed in the worksheet.
1. Conduct preexecution checks.

2. Conduct convoy operations to Camp Yukon.
3. Establish a bivouac:
• Conduct quartering party operations.
• Establish a defensive perimeter.
• Conduct refueling operations.
• Conduct mess operations.
• Establish field latrines.
• Establish field maintenance operations.
4. Plan and direct assault float bridge (AFB) construction.
5. Prepare for redeployment.
6. Conduct convoy operations to Ft. Chilly.
7. Conduct recovery operations.
8. Conduct AAR.
Figure G-1. Operational analysis
STEP 2. ASSESS (ENVIRONMENTAL) HAZARDS

Unit leaders assessed each hazard to determine the risk for potential harm to
the environment. Their assessment was based upon how often the
environmental hazard occurred during the operation (probability) and what
effect the hazard had on the environment (severity). They used the
probability and severity definitions from Figures 2-10 and 2-11, page 2-21
and 2-22. Leaders determined the initial risk of each hazard by applying the
risk assessment matrix in Figure 2-12, page 2-22 and 2-23. The unit
commander informed his staff to be sensitive to tactical bridging operations
and their effects on the Yukon River and surrounding areas. Each hazard
assessment was annotated in section G, (Figure G-2, page G-2). See Figures
G-2 through G-7, pages G-3 to G-8, for samples of a completed worksheet.
STEP 3. DEVELOP CONTROLS AND MAKE A DECISION
Unit leaders developed controls to eliminate or reduce the probability or

severity of each hazard. They identified a mix of educational-, physical-, and
avoidance-type controls and annotated them in section H (Figure G-2). Once
all risk control measures were in place, some risk remained. This residual
risk was annotated in section I (Figure G-2). Unit leaders informed the chain
of command and appropriate commander of the residual risk and its
implications for the operation. The commander was concerned about the
environmental hazards associated with the bridging operations and directed
his staff to consider additional controls. The staff developed additional
controls and presented the revised risk assessment to the commander,
thereby further reducing the residual risk. The commander agreed that the
new controls were sufficient and decided the residual risk was acceptable.
G-1
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
STEP 4. IMPLEMENT CONTROLS
Leaders identified how each control would be implemented and assigned

responsibility to unit personnel. The “how to” for each control was annotated
in section J (Figure G-2). For example, fueling bridge boats during bridging
operations was a major concern for the company. Leaders identified several
control measures to include ensuring that operators were properly trained to
dispense fuel, appropriate spill equipment was available, and all fueling of
boats was completed while the boats were still on the trucks before launch.
This step required leaders to anticipate environmental requirements and
incorporate them as part long-range, short-range, and near-term planning.
The residual risk determination was annotated in section K (Figure G-2).
STEP 5. SUPERVISE AND EVALUATE
Leaders and staff continuously monitored controls throughout the operation

to ensure their effectiveness and modified controls as required. Leaders made
on-the-spot corrections and evaluated individual and collective performances.
They held those in charge accountable and ensured that all tasks were
performed to applicable standards. Leaders discussed the evaluation of
environmental-related hazards, controls, soldier performance, and leader
supervision during AARs to ensure the development of environmental lessons
learned, for use in future operations.
SUMMARY
The 586th AFB Company leadership properly managed environmental-related

risk during their operation by accurately identifying potential environmental
hazards, developing controls, making risk decisions, implementing controls,
and ensuring proper supervision and evaluation. Due to effective risk
management, the company successfully completed the mission and
minimized their company’s impact on the environment.
Remember to look at the linkage of the environmental hazard assessment

and its associated impact on safety, force protection, and force health
protection as part of your overall risk management plan.
G-2
Begin: 010600RJunXX
586th Engineer Company FTX End: 061200RJunXX 22 May XX

Page 1 of 6
1LT Young, XO
Risk:
Conduct convoy

operations from Vehicle accidents and Moderate (M) TACSOP, para 8(a), OPORD - train all
1. Train all drivers on proper actions Low (L)
Fort Chilly to breakdowns causing to take during a spill. drivers before the exercise. Supply
Camp Yukon spill of fuel and HM • Protect yourself and other NCO will order and issue vehicle spill
personnel. equipment. Platoon leaders will brief
• Stop the flow. all soldiers before the convoy.
• Notify chain of command. (ARTEP 5-145-32. MTP 05-2-1030).
• Confine the spill.
2. Provide vehicle spill equipment.
TACSOP, para 11(a), OPORD -

Spills during refueling Moderate (M) 1. Train all fuel handlers on proper Low (L) support platoon leader will check
stops refueling procedures.
status of spill equipment and brief all
2. Provide spill equipment.
soldiers before the convoy on refueling
3. Ensure that only fuel handlers will
dispense fuel. procedures. (FM 10-71, FM 3-100.4,
4. Locate refueling sites away from ARTEP 5-145-32, MTP 05-2-1024).
bodies of water and wetland areas.
Moderate (M) 1. Brief all drivers to stay on primary Low (L) TACSOP, para 9(a), OPORD - provide
Maneuver damage from
and secondary roads. all drivers with strip map marking
off-road movement
2. Identify all sensitive areas and route and sensitive areas; leaders
habitat along the route. account for all vehicles at halts.
3. Conduct prior route recon. (ARTEP 5-145-32, MTP 05-2-1030).

G-3
Figure G-2. Sample of completed worksheet for tactical bivouac

G-4
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
Begin: 010600RJunXX

Page 2 of 6
1LT Young, XO
Risk:
Establish a
tactical bivouac Maneuver damage from Moderate (M) 1. Use quartering party to direct TACSOP, para 11a), OPORD - XO will
Low (L)
off-road movement vehicles and equipment into the lead quartering party, Camp Yukon
bivouac site. range control map. (ARTEP 5-145-32,
2. Identify and mark all sensitive MTP 05-2-0908, FM 71-1, FM 20-
areas within the bivouac area. 400).
3. Avoid using areas with endangered
and threatened species.
4. Provide maneuver-damage control
team.
TACSOP, para 11(a), OPORD -

Spills from tactical Moderate (M) 1. Train all fuel handlers on proper Low (L) support platoon leader will check
refueling operations refueling procedures.
status of spill equipment and brief all
2. Provide spill equipment.
soldiers before the convoy on refueling
3. Ensure that only fuel handlers will
dispense fuel. procedures. (FM 10-71, FM 3-100.4,
4. Locate refueling sites away from ARTEP 5-145-32, MTP 05-2-1024).
HM spills from Moderate (M) 1. Brief all personnel on proper waste- Low (L) TACSOP, para 12(a), OPORD - TM
vehicle-maintenance accumulation site and field PMCS 38-410, Camp Yukon Environmental and
procedures. Range regulations. (FM 43-5, ARTEP
operations
2. Provide spill equipment. 5-145-32, MTP 05-2-1131, ARTEP
3. Provide secondary containment for 5-145-32, MTP 05-2-1005).
all drums and containers.
Figure G-3. Sample of completed worksheet for tactical bivouac (continued)

Begin: 010600RJunXX
586th Engineer Company FTX
End: 061200JunXX 22 May XX
D. Prepared By: (Rank, Last name, Duty Position)
Page 3 of 6
1 LT Young, XO
Risk:
Establish a Digging in sensitive and restriced Moderate (M) 1. Dig only in approved areas Low (L) TACSOP, para 7(a), OPORD – FM 7-
tactical bivouac areas confirmed by range control. 10, Camp Yukon Environmental and

(continued) 2. Identify and mark all sensitive Range Regulations (ARTEP 5-145-32,
areas and habitats within the MTP 05-2-0913).
AO.
3. Site all fighting positions to
avoid sensitive areas.
4. Fill in all excavations upon
departure.
Starting range and training area Moderate (M) 1. Inform soldiers that no open Low (L) TACSOP, para 7(a), OPORD – FM 7-
fires fires are allowed. 10, Camp Yukon Environmental and
2. Provide fire-prevention Range Regulations (ARTEP 5-145-32,
equipment at refueling, MTP 05-2-0917).
messing, maintenance, and
other specified locations in
OPORD.
3. Brief soldiers on the proper
use of pytotechnics, smoke
pots, and grenades.
Polluting water sources form field Moderate (M) 1. Coordinate for “port-a-potty” Low (L) TACSOP, para 7(a), OPORD – FM 7-
latrines and mess operations units from range control. 10, Camp Yukon Environmental and
2. Recover all mess operations Range Regulations (FM 21-10, FM
waste (grease, trash). 10-23, ARTEP 5-145-32, MTP 05-
3. Inform soldiers of proper field 2-1031, ARTEP 5-145-32, MTP 05-
sanitation techniques. 2-1009).
4. Train field sanitation teams.
5. Establish trash collection
points.
Figure G-4. Sample of complete worksheet for tactical bivouac (continued)

G-5
G-6
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
Begin: 010600RJunXX

Page 4 of 6
1LT Young, XO
Risk:
Establish a Leaving litter and Moderate (M) 1. Ensure that leaders conduct daily TACSOP, para 7(a), OPORD - FM 7-
Low (L)
tactical bivouac debris in training areas inspections of the bivouac area. 10, Camp Yukon Environmental and
(continued) 2. Brief soldiers on trash-collection Range Regulations - First Sergeant will
points and procedures. coordinate training area final
3. Conduct periodic police calls of inspection with range control.
area.
4. Ensure that leaders account for all
equipment, supplies, wire, trash,
and wastes before departing an
area.
Figure G-5. Sample of completed worksheet for tactical bivouac (continued)

Begin: 010600RJunXX

Page 5 of 6
1LT Young, XO
Risk:
Plan and direct Maneuver damage and High (H) TACSOP, para 13(a), OPORD - FM
1. Conduct operations only in approved Moderate (M)
assault float- erosion to entry and

areas. 90-13, Camp Yukon Environmental and
bridge exit banks 2. Use recon party to identify and Range Regulations (TM 5-5420-209-
construction mark all sensitive areas and routes 12, TM 5-1940-277-10, ARTEP 5-
within the AO. 145-32, MTP 05-2-0605).
3. Use vehicle guides to direct vehicles
and equipment into the AO.
4. Control vehicle speeds and
movements.
5. Harden and stabilize entry and exit
points to minimize erosion and
maximize mobility.
Spill into river from High (H) TACSOP, para 13(a), OPORD - FM
1. Train all fuel handlers on proper Moderate (M)
over-the-water boat refueling procedures. 90-13, Camp Yukon Environmental and
refueling and fueling 2. Provide spill equipment. Range Regulations (FM 10-71, TM 5-
of tactical vehicles 3. Ensure that only fuel handlers will 5420-209-12, TM 5-1940-277-10,
near river dispense fuel. ARTEP 5-145-32, MTP 05-2-0605).
4. Locate refueling site away from
5. Ensure that there will be no over-
the-water refueling.
Oil and greasy water High (H) 1. Brief all boat operators concerning Moderate (M)
bilged from bridge- proper bilging procedures. TACSOP, para 13(a), OPORD - FM
erection boats into 2. Provide spill equipment for each 90-13, Camp Yukon Environmental and
river boat. Range Regulations (TM 5-5420-209-
3. Steam clean each engine 12).
compartment before FTX.

G-7
Figure G-6. Sample of completed worksheet for float-bridge construction

G-8
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
Begin: 010600RJunXX

Page 6 of 6
1LT Young, XO
Risk:
Plan and direct Maneuvering in High (H) TACSOP, para 10(a), OPORD - Camp
1. Conduct operations only in approved Moderate (M)
assault float- threatened and areas. Yukon Range Control Map, Camp Yukon
bridge endangered species
construction 2. Use recon party to identify and mark Environmental and Range regulations.
(continued) habitat and all sensitive areas and routes within (ARTEP 5-145-32, MTP 05-2-0410,
archaeological sites the AO.
FM 5-36, FM 3-100.4.
3. Use vehicle guides to direct vehicles
and equipment into the AO.
4. Control vehicle speeds and
movements.
Use of smoke pots and High (H) 1. Brief all leaders on proper use and Moderate (M) TACSOP, para 13(a), OPORD - Camp
grenades in sensitive deployment of smoke pots and
habitat areas and grenades. Yukon Environmental and Range
civilian population 2. Use smoke only in approved areas. Regulations. (FM 3-50, ARTEP 5-145-
areas 3. Coordinate with range control before 32, MTP 05-2-0917).
smoke operations.
4. Observe and calculate atmospheric
effects on the dispersion and direction
of the smoke areas.
5. Stop smoke operations immediately if
atmospheric conditions change, or when
notified by range control.
Washing vehicles and Moderate (M) 1. Inform all leaders to conduct vehicle Low (L)
equipment in or around and equipment cleaning only at approved TACSOP, para 14(a), OPORD - Camp
water sources washracks before departure from Camp Yukon Environmental and Range
Yukon. Regulations.
2. Ensure that leaders will inform and
supervise soldiers.
Figure G-7. Sample of completed worksheet for float-bridge construction(continued)

Appendix H
Unit Environmental Self-Assessment

This appendix provides a generic checklist for leaders to assess the state
of their unit’s environmental program and the unit’s compliance with
environmental laws and regulations. Leaders should check with their
installation/operational staffs to incorporate applicable state, local, or HN
environmental regulations. Once supplemented, this list serves as a tool
to conduct a unit’s environmental self-assessment. All “no” responses
will require corrective action. A more comprehensive assessment (if
desired) can be conducted using ECAS or ECE checklists available from
the installation or by requesting a courtesy visit from the installation
environmental office.
YES NO I. Management
1. Is an ECO appointed in writing?
2. Is the ECO properly trained as soon as possible after the duty

assignment?
3. Does the ECO maintain a file containing applicable references,

appointing orders, inspection records, and training documents for the
last 24 months?
4. Have all soldiers/Marines received the required environmental training?
Is that training documented?
5. Does the unit’s SOP cover spill prevention and response?
6. Does the unit’s SOP cover the use of the MSDS?
7. Does the unit SOP cover pollution prevention?
H-1
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
YES NO I. Management (continued)
8. Does the unit have a recycling program?
9. Is good housekeeping evident in POL, HM, and HW storage

areas?
10. Does the unit have appropriate references (ARs, FMs, TMs,
installation regulations, command policies, SOPs) on hand?
YES NO II. Accumulation Sites
1. Are there adequate dikes or catchment areas around

accumulation sites?
2. Are HW, used oil, or other possible pollutants stored in

authorized containers?
3. Are used oil tanks pumped out when full?
4. Are containers properly labeled?
5. Are containers secured to prevent contamination by rainwater

or any other potential contaminant?
YES NO III. Hazardous Material/Hazardous Wastes
1. Are amounts of HM on hand limited to the minimum needed

(no stockpiling of HM)?
2. Is the unit’s HM/HW inventory (quantity and location) up to

date?
3. Do HW containers have drum logs to account for all additions

and to specify personnel authorized to make additions to the
containers?
4. Are MSDSs on hand for all HM? Are MSDSs readily available
to all workers exposed to HM?
H-2
YES NO III. Hazardous Material/Hazardous Wastes (continued)
5. Is HW accumulated in authorized containers?
6. Are containers labeled according to directives?
7. Are containers in good condition and closed when not in use?
8. Are contents of containers compatible with the container?
9. Are accumulation start dates and HW labels on each HW

container?
10. Are container storage areas inspected at required intervals?
11. Is HM/HW managed for prompt pick up and transportation to

disposal facility according to directives?
12. Are used oil accumulation tanks only used for collection of
used oil?
13. Are danger and warning signs conspicuously placed?
14. Is spill prevention and control equipment adequate?
15. Are personnel trained in the proper handling, collection,

storage, or transportation of HM/HW?
16. Are dumpsters free of HM/HW items?
17. Are used POL cans and drums disposed of properly?
18. Are asbestos-containing parts (brake shoes, clutch plates,

and equipment insulation) removed, collected, and disposed
of properly?
19. Are batteries stored/disposed of properly?
H-3
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
YES NO III. Hazardous Material/Hazardous Wastes (continued)
20. Is equipment containing radioactive sources (i.e., gun/mortar

sights, M8A1 alarms) properly stored to prevent breakage and
release of radioactive materials? Are incidents reported
properly?
21. Is ammunition stored properly?
YES NO IV. Solid Waste Management
1. Are procedures to reduce production of waste enforced?
2. Are product separation and recycling efforts in effect?
3. Are source reduction practices enforced?
4. Is the unit requisitioning only supplies needed (not stockpiling

excessive materials)?
5. While washing waste containers, are water, soap, kitchen

grease, or garbage kept from entering the street, storm
drainage system, or groundwater source?
6. Are solid waste containers kept closed?
YES NO V. Spill Prevention
1. Is the unit spill prevention plan present? Is it understood and

being followed?
2. Are oil, fuel, battery acid, hydraulic oil, or other HM spills

properly reported?
3. Does the unit enforce prohibitions against discharging

pollutants into storm or washrack drains or pouring pollutants
on the ground or along fence lines?
4. Are small oil spills cleaned up promptly and effectively?
H-4
YES NO V. Spill Prevention (continued)
5. Are drip pans used under vehicles/equipment and spigots of

POL product barrels where spills are likely to occur?
6. Is contaminated soil properly disposed of at a designated

authorized disposal area?
YES NO VI. Recycling Program
1. Is all material recycled according to directives?
2. Is the unit delivering material to the installation’s recycling

center?
3. Are recyclable materials source-separated?
4. Is contaminated material separated from recyclables?
5. Is the unit recycling all materials accepted by the installation’s

recycling center?
6. Are dumpsters free of recyclable items?
7. Are used cleaning solvents recycled/collected properly?
YES NO VII. Washracks
1. Are vehicles and/or equipment washed only in authorized

washracks?
2. Is steam cleaning equipment used only in authorized

washracks?
3. Are washracks and vicinity free of contaminated soil, sand,

and silt?
H-5
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
YES NO VII. Washracks (continued)
4. Are readable signs prominently posted to indicate which

solvents or soap may be used, where appropriate?
5. Are metal gratings or baffles present and in good condition at

washrack oil interceptor, catch basins, and floor drains?
6. Are washrack areas free of oil and/or fuel spills? Are the
washrack areas free of oily rags and trash?
7. Are treatment devices (oil and grease interceptors, catch

basins, collection ponds, drains, and tanks) properly
maintained and serviced?
8. Does the SOP indicate how to request maintenance for and
pumping of oil/water separators?
9. Are faucets and/or backflow preventors in good operating

condition?
10. Are only authorized soap, solvent, or chemicals used with

steam cleaning equipment?
11. Are oil/water separators in good working condition?
12. Are vehicle/equipment/aircraft wastewater discharges tied into

a treatment system?
YES NO VIII. Land Management
1. Are vehicles maneuvered only in authorized areas?
2. Are surface areas and curbs free of vehicular damage?
3. Is the area free of litter?
4. Is gravel used only in authorized areas and in an authorized

manner?
H-6
YES NO VIII. Land Management (continued)
5. Are archaeological, cultural, and historical resources

safeguarded?
6. Are vegetation/trees only being cut, removed, or used with

appropriate approval (range control/forester)?
7. Are personnel ensuring that garbage, refuse, and rubbish are

never burned or buried on ranges or training areas without
appropriate approval?
8. Are storm water ditches in the vicinity of motor pools free of
POL or other HM/HW?
9. Are detention ponds and sump collection points functional

and properly serviced?
10. Are paint sprays and battery and radiation repair operations
conducted properly and coordinated with the EMO, safety,
and preventive medicine offices?
11. Are collection points established with proper containers and
servicing for all maintenance-generated wastes?
12. Does the unit fill in fighting positions and all other excavations
upon exercise completion and redeployment?
13. Does the unit have a maneuver damage control element for
each operation? Are all damages properly reported and
corrected according to command guidance?
14. Are refueling sites located away from sensitive areas such as
wetlands, water sources, drainage areas, and endangered
species habitats?
15. Does the unit have appropriate spill prevention equipment at
high risk locations (refueling, maintenance, messing) and is it
available to spill prevention personnel?
16. Does the unit use track turning pads where appropriate?
17. Does the unit confirm and mark sensitive areas to prevent
damage to endangered species habitat and
archaeological/cultural areas?
18. Does the unit conduct soldier/Marine environmental
awareness briefings before an operation?
H-7
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
YES NO VIII. Land Management (continued)
19. Does the unit conduct smoke operations and the proper use
of pyrotechnics according to local regulations and policies?
20. Does the unit coordinate with the installation/operational staff

before an exercise to obtain information on the AO in regard
to environmental issues?
21. Does the unit cross or ford streams/rivers at authorized
areas?
22. Is the unit aware of noise restrictions (limited hours, rotary

wing operations, demolitions, proximity to civilian population,
endangered species habitat) and comply with them?
YES NO IX. Local Supplemental Requirements (coordinate with

installation EMO/operational staff)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
H-8
Glossary
1SG first sergeant
AAR after-action review; after-action report
AC active component
accident risk All operational risk considerations other than tactical risks. Includes risk to
friendly forces, risk posed to civilians by an operation, as well as the impact of operations on
the environment.
ACCP Army Correspondence Course Program
ACHP Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
AE Army Europe
AETMP Army Environmental Training Master Plan
AFB assault float bridge
AFI Air Force Instruction
AIRFA American Indian Religious Freedom Act
ALMC Army Logistics Management College
AO area of operations
AOAP Army Oil Analysis Program
AOR area of responsibility
APO Army post office
APOD aerial point of departure
AR Army regulation
ARPA Archeological Resources Preservation Act
ARTEP Army Training and Evaluation Program
asbestos A group of natural minerals that tend to separate into strong, heat-resistant fibers.
Used as an insulator, it is a suspected carcinogen.
ASG Area Support Group
attn attention
Glossary-1
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
autoignition temperature Temperature at which a chemical can spontaneously ignite.
BASOPS base operations
BCAT base camp assistance/assessment team
BCCA base camp coordination agency
BESC Basic Environmental Staff Course
BII basic issue inventory
bn battalion
boiling point The temperature at which a compound will go from the liquid state to the vapor
state.
BRAC base realignment and closure
BSB Base Support Battalion
C2 command and control
CAA Clean Air Act
CALL Center for Army Lessons Learned
CAO customer assistance office
CARC chemical agent resistant coating
carcinogen A substance known to cause or help the growth of cancerous cells.
CAS (chemical abstract service number) A unique number given to a chemical compound when
it has been thoroughly identified. Information can be tracked by that number even when a
different trade name or synonym is given for the chemical.
CBR chemical, biological, and radiological
CCIR commander’s critical information requirements
CD compact disc
cdr’s commander’s
CEIHOT Center for Environmental Initiatives and Hands On Training
ceiling The maximum concentration that is allowed for any exposure. Area must be vacated at
once if this level is reached.
CESOS Civil Engineer Corps Officer School
2-Glossary
Glossary
CESP civil engineering support plan
CETEP comprehensive environmental training and education program
CEQ council on environmental quality
CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act; regulates

clean up of HW sites. Also known as "Superfund." Amended by SARA of 1986.
CERL US Army Construction Engineering Laboratories
CFC Chlorofluorocarbons; a family of fully halogenated hydrocarbons containing fluorine and

chlorine. These substances are environmentally harmful because they deplete the earth's
stratospheric ozone layer.
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
characteristics of HW Physical/chemical properties of an HW. The EPA has defined four

characteristics that can be determined by tests:
1. Ignitability: the ability to catch fire.
2. Corrosivity: the ability to corrode other materials.
3. Reactivity: the ability to enter into a violent chemical reaction, which may
involve explosions or fumes.
4. Toxicity: the ability to release certain toxic constituents when leaded with mild
acid.
chemical A substance that is produced by or used in a chemical process.
Chemical agent resistant coding
chlorine A chemical used in water purification for removal of bacteria.
CINC commander in chief; commander of a combatant command.
civil action A lawsuit filed in court against a person who has either failed to comply with
statutory or regulatory requirements or an administrative order, or has contributed to a
release of hazardous wastes or constituents. There are four types of civil actions:
compliance, corrective, monitoring and analysis, and imminent hazard.
CJTF commander, joint task force
CO commanding officer
COA course of action
CofS Chief of Staff
Glossary-3
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
Commander's Guide to Environmental Management This reference provides commanders

with basic information concerning their responsibilities in managing the Army's
environmental program at the installation or activity level. It is intended as a primer on the
environmental program. The guide is currently published by USAEC; it will be converted to
an official Army publication.
compliance The Army’s expectation that soldiers obey local, state, federal and HN
environmental requirements.
conexes container express
CONPLAN contingency plan
conservation The act of conserving and preserving natural and cultural resources so they will
be available for present and future generations.
CONUS continental United States; from an environmental standpoint, CONUS refers to any
land over which the EPA has jurisdiction. Included are Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam
and the Virgin Islands.
convoy A group of vehicles organized for the purpose of control and orderly movement with or
without escort protection.
coolants Substances used to reduce the temperature of systems.
CPG Commandant’s Planning Guidance
CREST corps real estate support team
criminal action A prosecutorial action taken by the US Government or a state towards any
person(s) who has knowingly and willfully not complied with the law. Such an action can
result in the imposition of fines or imprisonment.
critical habitat A designated area declared essential for the survival of a protected species
under authority of the ESA.
CRMP Cultural Resources Management Plan
crossing site(s) The location along a water obstacle where the crossing can be made using
amphibious vehicles, assault boats, rafts, bridges, or fording vehicles.
CRREL US Army Cold Regions Research Engineering Laboratory
CS The riot control chemical agent called chlorobenzalmalononitrile (tear gas).
CWA Clean Water Act
CZ combat zone
DA Department of the Army
DC District of Columbia
4-Glossary
Glossary
DCSBOS Deputy Chief of Staff for Base Operations and Support
DD defense document (generally used with form numbers: DD Form 1348-1)
DENIX Defense Environmental Network and Information Exchange
DEQ Directorate of Environmental Quality. This is another name for the EMO when it is not
under the DPW.
DERA Defense Environmental Restoration Account
DERP Defense Environmental Restoration Program
detergents Synthetic water soluble cleaning agents that act like soap.
discharge Includes, but is not limited to, the accidental or intentional spilling, leaking,
pumping, emitting, emptying, or dumping of a substance on any land or into water.
disposal The discharge, deposit, dumping, spilling, leaking, or placing of any solid waste or HW
into or on any land or water.
div division
DIV division
DLA Defense Logistics Agency
DNBI disease and non-battle injury
DOD Department of Defense
DODD Department of Defense Directive
DODI Department of Defense Instruction
DOL Directorate of Logistics
DOT Department of Transportation
DPTM Directorate of Plans, Training, and Mobilization
DPW Directorate of Public Works
DRMO Defense Reutilization and Marketing Office
DS2 Decontaminant solution 2; incompatible with most metals, DS2 is procured exclusively by
DOD to decontaminate machinery after a chemical weapons attack. DS2 is not authorized
for training due to the hazards it presents to humans who are exposed to it. It can cause
severe burns, stricture of the esophagus, and damage to the central nervous system, liver,
and reproductive system.
Glossary-5
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
DSN Defense System Telecommunications Network
DTG date-time group
DTLOMS doctrine, training, leader development, organizational design, material development,

soldier support
EA Environmental assessment; required by NEPA; a study to determine if significant

environmental impacts are expected from a proposed action.
EARC US Army Environmental Awareness Resource Center
EBS environmental baseline survey
EC environmental coordinator
ECAS Environmental Compliance Assessment System; this system involves the use of the
environmental compliance assessment. Also referred to as an environmental audit or
environmental program review, it involves an examination of an installation's environmental
program to identify possible compliance deficiencies. It also includes designing corrective
action plans and implementing fixes for identified deficiencies.
ECE environmental compliance evaluation
ECO environmental compliance officer
ECR environmental conditions report
ECRB environmental compliance review board
ecology The science concerned with the relationship between organisms and their environment
and the interrelationships and interdependence of these organisms; that is, the study of
living things in relation to the environment and to each other.
ecosystem A system formed by the interaction of a community of organisms with its

environment.
EEA environmental executive agent
EIRB environmental impact review board
EIS Environmental impact statement; a document prepared by EPA or under EPA guidance,
which identifies and analyzes in detail the environmental impacts of a proposed action.
ELOW environmental laws of war
EMO environmental management office
ENCOM engineer command
ENCOORD engineer coordinator
6-Glossary
Glossary
endangered species Those species designated by the Secretary of the Interior which are in
danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of their range.
ENMOD environmental modification
ENRD Environmental and Natural Resources Division
evaporation rate How rapidly compound evaporates based on a reference compound. The
higher the number the faster the material will evaporate.
environmental audit A compliance review of facility operations, practices, and records to

assess and verify compliance with federal, state, and local environmental laws and
regulations.
environmental ethic Taking care of the environment because it is the right thing to do. This
ethic is the operating principle and value that governs individual soldiers, units, and the
Army.
environmental noise The outdoor noise environment consisting of all noise (including ambient
noise) from all sources that extend beyond, but do not include, the workplace.
environmental planning Efforts that consider the impact of operation, training, exercises, or
weapon system introduction on the environment, and where necessary, allow decision
makers to take early action to eliminate or mitigate those impacts. Additionally,
environmental planning may require consultation or submission of documentation to
demonstrate that environmental considerations have been taken.
environmental pollution The condition resulting from the presence of chemical, mineral,
radioactive, or biological substances that alter the natural environment or that adversely
affect human health or the quality of life, biosystems, the environment, structures and
equipment, recreational opportunities, aesthetics, or natural beauty.
environmental reconnaissance The systematic observation and recording of site or area data
collected by visual or physical means, dealing specifically with environmental conditions as
they exist, and identifying areas that are environmentally sensitive or of relative
environmental concern, for information and decision-making purposes.
environmental stewardship The care and management of the property of another, the
environment. Army objective is to plan, initiate, and carry out its actions and programs in a
manner that minimizes adverse effects on the environment without impairing the mission.
EO executive order
EOD explosive ordnance disposal
EPA Environmental Protection Agency; established in 1970, the EPA is charged with protecting
and enhancing the environment today and for future generations to the fullest extent
possible.
EPCRA Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act
EQCC Environmental Quality Control Committee
Glossary-7
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
ER environmental report
ES environmental statement
ESA Endangered Species Act
FEDLOG federal logistics
FFCA Federal Facilities Compliance Act
FGS final governing standards
FIFO first-in-first-out
FIFRA Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
flash point Temperature at which there is enough vapor of a chemical to ignite if a spark is
present.
FM field manual
FMO facilities management office
FOIA Freedom of Information Act
FONSI finding of no significant impact
force health protection All services performed, provided, or arranged by the Services to
promote, improve, conserve, or restore the mental or physical well being of personnel. These
services include, but are not limited to, the management of health services resources such as
manpower, monies, and facilities; preventive and curative health measure; evacuation of the
wounded, injured, or sick; selection of the medically fit and disposition of the medically unfit;
blood management; medical supply, equipment, and maintenance thereof; combat stress
control; and medical, dental, veterinary, laboratory, optometry, medical food, and medical
intelligence services.
force protection Actions taken to prevent or mitigate hostile actions against Department of
Defense personnel (to include family members), resources, facilities, and critical information.
These actions conserve the force’s fighting potential so it can be applied at the decisive time
and place. It coordinates and synchronizes offensive and defensive measures to enable the
effective employment of the force while degrading opportunities for the enemy. Force
protection does not include actions to defeat the enemy or protect against accidents, weather,
or disease.
FRAGO fragmentary order
freezing point The temperature at which a compound will change from a liquid to a solid.
FSOP field standing operating procedures
FTX field training exercise
8-Glossary
Glossary
FUDS formerly used defense sites
FY fiscal year
G1 Assistant Chief of Staff, Personnel, General Staff
G2 Assistant Chief of Staff, Intelligence, General Staff
G3 Assistant Chief of Staff, Operations, General Staff
G4 Assistant Chief of Staff, Logistics, General Staff
G5 Assistant Chief of Staff, Civil Affairs, General Staff
gray water Any nontoilet water (nonsewage) that is nonpotable because it was used in some
way (for example, water from sinks, bathtubs, showers, or laundry operation).
groundwater A body of water, generally within the boundaries of a watershed, that exists in
the internal passageways of porous geological formations (aquifers) and which flows in
response to gravitational forces. Nearly half of the US population uses groundwater as its
primary water source.
GSA General Services Administration
GTA graphics training aid
halons A family of fully halogenated hydrocarbons containing bromines. These substances are
environmentally harmful because they deplete the earth’s stratospheric ozone layer.
hazard A condition that can be expected to cause damages including injury or death to exposed
individuals.
hazardous substance Under CERCLA, any element, compound, mixture, solution, or

substance which, when released into the environment, on land or in water, may present an
imminent and substantial danger to public health/welfare or the environment. The
definition is broader than the definition of hazardous waste under RCRA.
HAZCOM Hazard communication; the responsibility of leaders and supervisors concerning

possible hazards in the workplace and notification of hazards and necessary precautions to
their soldiers.
HAZMIN hazardous waste minimization
health hazards Those hazards that can cause injury or illness when a person is exposed to
hazardous chemicals by inhalation, ingestion, swallowing, skin contact, or eye contact.
HEMTT heavy expanded mobility tactical truck
HHC headquarters, headquarter company
Glossary-9
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
historic artifacts Something created by humans usually for a practical purpose especially an
object remaining from a particular period (prehistoric caves, burial sites).
HM Hazardous material; any material, including waste, that may pose an unreasonable risk to
health, safety, property, or the environment, when they exist in specific quantities and forms.
Chemicals that have been determined by the Secretary of Transportation to present risks to
safety, health, and property during transportation.
HMCC Hazardous Material Control Center
HMTA Hazardous Materials Transportation Act
HN Host nation; a nation which receives the forces and/or supplies of Allied nations and/or
North Atlantic Treaty Organization organizations to be located on, or to operate in or to
transit through its territory.
HQ headquarters
HQMC Headquarters, Marine Corps
HSMS Hazardous Substance Management System
HW Hazardous waste; waste which, if improperly managed, can create a risk to the safety or
health of people or to the environment. EPA considers hazardous waste a subset of both solid
waste and hazardous materials. Technically, those wastes that are regulated under RCRA
40 CFR, part 261 either because they are "listed" or because they are ignitable, corrosive,
reactive, or toxic.
HWAS hazardous waste accumulation site
IAW in accordance with
ICUZ Installation compatibility use zone; a land use planning procedure employed to control
environmental noise.
ID identification
IET installation environmental trainer
I&L installations and logistics
IMO installation management office
incineration Disposal of waste materials through controlled burning.
INRMP Integrated Natural Resource Management Plan
IOSC Installation On-Scene Coordinator
IPB intelligence preparation of the battlefield
IPM integrated pest management
10-Glossary
Glossary
IPMP Integrated Pest Management Plan; the management of actual and potential pest
problems using a combination of available preventive and corrective control measures. The
biological effectiveness, environmental acceptability, and cost effectiveness of pest control
measures must be considered before such measures can be approved for use on Army-
controlled property.
IRP Installation restoration program; the military's program to address environmental

contamination at its facilities.
IRT installation response team. Those collective persons designated to act in an emergency to
perform functions directed by the installation on-scene coordinator.
ISCP Installation Spill Contingency Plan; document detailing resources and procedures for
cleanup of oil and hazardous substances spills.
ISD installation supply division
ITAM integrated training area management
ITS individual training standard
JCMB joint civil-military coordination board
JEMB joint environmental management board
JIC joint information center
JMMO joint material management office
JOC joint operations center
JOPES Joint Operation Planning and Execution System
JP joint publication
JP jet petroleum
JSI joint staff instruction
JTB joint transportation board or joint targeting board
JTF joint task force
JTFCEM joint task force contingency engineering management
JRETC Joint Regional Environment Training Center
landfill An in-ground disposal site for wastes that were designed to reduce air pollution and
unsightly trash that resulted from open dumping and burning. Older landfills leak
contaminants into the soil and groundwater, although many new ones are built with
elaborate leak prevention systems.
Glossary-11
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
LCTA land condition trend analysis
LEPC local emergency planning committee
LO lubrication order
LOGCAP Logistics Civil Augmentation Program
LRAM land rehabilitation and maintenance
LRP logistics resupply point
lubricants Substances (such as grease) capable of reducing friction, heat, and wear when
introduced as a film between solid surfaces.
MACOM major Army command
MAJ major
MCCDC Marine Corps Combat Development Command
MCL maximum contaminant level
MCO Marine Corps order
MCRP Marine Corps reference publication
MDMP military decision-making process
MDRD mobilization, deployment, redeployment, and demobilization
MECH mechanized
medical waste Any waste that is generated in the diagnosis, treatment, or immunization of
human beings or animals.
melting point The temperature at which a compound will change from a solid to a liquid.
METL mission essential task list
METT-TC mission, enemy, terrain, troops, time available, and considerations.
MGRS military grid reference system
military environmental protection The application and integration of all aspects of natural
environmental considerations, as they apply to the conduct of military operations.
MMPA Marine Mammal Protection Act
MO Missouri
12-Glossary
Glossary
MOGAS motor gas
MOMs measures of merit
monitoring The assessment of emissions and ambient air quality conditions. Monitoring
techniques used are emission estimates, visible emission readings, diffusion or dispersion
estimates, and sampling or measurement with analytical instruments.
MOS military occupational specialty
MP military police
MSC major subordinate command
MSDS material safety data sheet
MTP mission training plan
NAAQS national ambient air quality standards
NAGPRA Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act
NBC nuclear, biological, chemical
NCA Noise Control Act
NCO noncommissioned officer
NCOIC noncommissioned officer in charge
NCP National Contingency Plan
NEPA National Environmental Policy Act
NG National Guard
NHPA National Historic Preservation Act
NOV Notice of violation; formal written document provided to an installation by a regulatory

agency as a result of environmental noncompliance.
NOX nitrogen oxide
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NPS National Park Service
NSN national stock number
NTC national training center
NWP Naval warfare publication
Glossary-13
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
OCONUS outside the continental United States
OEBGD overseas environmental baseline guidance document
OIC officer in charge
OJE Operation Joint Endeavor
OPA Oil Pollution Act
OPFOR opposing forces
OPG Operational Planning Group
OPNAVIST Operational Naval Instruction
OPLAN operation plan
OPORD operation order
OPSEC operations security
OPTEMPO operations tempo
OSD Office of the Secretary of Defense
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Act or Occupational Safety and Health Administration
PAM pamphlet
PAO public affairs office(r)
PAH polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon
PCB/Polychlorinated biphenyls A family of chemicals that are probable carcinogens, once

widely used in electrical insulation. Banned in the US in 1979, PCB contamination has
occurred on US bases where abandoned electrical transformers have leaked into the
environment.
PCN product control number
penalties The legal punishment (fines, jail) for having violated a law.
pesticides A chemical or other substance used to destroy plants and animal pests.
physical hazards Those hazards that can cause explosions, fires, violent chemical reactions, or
other hazardous situations.
PLL prescribed load list
PMCS preventive maintenance checks and services
14-Glossary
Glossary
PMO provost marshal office
PMP Pest Management Plan
POC point of contact
POL petroleum, oils, and lubricants
PPE personal protective equipment
PPM Parts per million; molecules of chemical per one million molecules of air.
prevention The process of reducing or eliminating pollution.
primacy A legal situation which allows the states to have environmental and worker protection
standards more stringent than the federal standards.
Pub publication
QA quality assurance
QCA Quiet Communities Act
QM quartermaster
radon A colorless, odorless, radioactive by-product from the natural degradation of uranium.
RC Reserve component
RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
REC record of environmental consideration (related to NEPA)
reclamation Regeneration of a material, or processing a material to recover a usable product.

Examples include the recovery of lead from spent batteries or the regeneration of spent
solvents.
recovered materials Waste materials and by-products that have been recovered or diverted
from solid waste, but this term does not include those materials and by-products generated
from, and commonly reused within, an original manufacturing process.
recyclability The ability of a product or material to be recovered from, or otherwise diverted

from, the solid waste stream for the purpose of recycling.
recycling The process by which recovered materials are transformed into new or usable
products.
restoration The process of cleaning up contaminated sites.
Glossary-15
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
risk The probability of exposure, coupled with the severity of the consequences. Risk is often
used in a more general way than danger, in that risk is used to describe potential financial
loss or property damage in addition to environmental damage or personal injury.
ROD record of decision
ROE rules of engagement
ROK Republic of Korea
ROWPU reverse osmosis water purification unit
S1 Personnel Staff Officer, Adjutant, Brigade and Battalion
S2 Intelligence Staff Officer, Brigade and Battalion
S3 Operations and Training Officer, Brigade and Battalion
S4 Logistics Staff Officer, Supply Officer, Brigade and Battalion
S5 Civil-Military Operations Staff Officer, Brigade and Battalion
SA Sikes Act
SARA Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act
SDWA Safe Drinking Water Act
SET state environmental trainer
SF standard form
SITREP situation report
SITTEMP situation template
SJA staff judge advocate
SOFA Status of Forces Agreement. An agreement on the stationing of forces to which the US is
a party, such as a multilateral or bilateral stationing or base rights agreement, or an
arrangement or understanding concluded thereunder.
solid waste Any material or substance (solid or liquid) which is inherently waste-like by being
no longer suitable for its originally intended purpose.
solubility The quality or state of being able to dissolve in water. The amount of substance that
will dissolve in a given amount of another substance.
solvents Volatile organic compounds (trichloroethylene and so forth) used as powerful cleaners,
degreasers, and paint strippers. At one time solvents were widely used in the military's
industrial production and maintenance operations and routinely dumped untreated into the
ground.
16-Glossary
Glossary
SOP standing operating procedure
source reduction The DOD has set the goal of reducing HW generation at its sources. This
reduction is to be achieved through product substitution, recycling, and inventory control,
and by developing new industrial processes that use less hazardous materials, such as bead
blasting rather than solvents to remove paint.
sovereign immunity A legal situation in which the sovereign (for example, federal
government) cannot be held legally liable for what it does or does not do.
spill A generic term that encompasses the accidental and the deliberate but unpermitted
discharge or release of a pollutant.
SPILLREP spill report
SPRP spill prevention response plan
STARC State Area Command
STB super tropical bleach
STP soldier training publication
Superfund See CERCLA.
surface water Water contained in rivers, streams, and so forth.
TACSOP tactical standing operating procedures
tactical risk The risk concerned with hazards that exist because of the presence of either the
enemy or an adversary.
TAML Theater Army medical laboratory
TBP to be published
TC training circular
TEL telephone
TG trainer's guide
threatened species Those species that are likely to become endangered within the foreseeable
future throughout all or a significant portion of their range.
threshold limit value (time weighted average) The recommended limit for worker exposure
over an 8-hour work day.
TID turn-in document
TM technical manual
Glossary-17
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
TO table of organization
TO theater of operation
toxic Capable of producing injury, illness, or damage to humans, domestic livestock, wildlife, or
other organisms through ingestion, inhalation, or absorption through any body surface.
TRADOC United States Army Training and Doctrine Command
TSC Training Support Center
TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act
TSDF treatment, storage, disposal facility
TTP tactics, techniques, and procedures
UECO unit environmental compliance officer
UI unit of issue
US United States
USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers
USACHPPM United States Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine
(formerly USAEHA)
USAEC United States Army Environmental Center; provides oversight, coordination, and
execution support for Army environmental programs and projects, and technical and related
support. Formerly the US Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency.
USAEHA United States Army Environmental Hygiene Agency (now USACHPPM)
USAES United States Army Engineer School
USAREUR United States Army Europe
USC United States Code
USE Used Solvent Elimination Program
USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
USFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service
USMC United States Marine Corps
US-ROK United States – Republic of Korea
UST Underground storage tank. Below- or in-ground tank, storing oil or hazardous substances,
regulated under RCRA.
18-Glossary
Glossary
UTM universal traverse mercator
UXO unexploded ordnance
VA Virginia
vapor density How heavy vapor is relative to air. Air is assigned a vapor density of 1. If the
number is less than 1, the vapor from the compound will rise. If the number is greater than
1, the vapor will tend to sink to the ground.
vapor pressure Pressure of a compound in the vapor state. The higher the number the more
readily the compound will evaporate. Compounds with high vapor pressures are often
flammable and if contained in a sealed container may burst.
viscosity Measure of how “thick” a liquid or semi-solid material is at room temperature.
VOC volatile organic compound
waste Any discarded material.
wetlands Generally includes marshes, swaps, bogs, and similar areas. Areas that are
inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to
support a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for saturated soil conditions.
WO warning order
XO executive officer
Glossary-19
References
SOURCES USED
These are the sources quoted or paraphrased in this publication.
JOINT AND MULTISERVICE PUBLICATIONS
JP 1-02. DOD Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms. 28 January 1998.
JP 3-34. Engineer Doctrine for Joint Operations. To be published within 6 months.
JP 4-04. Joint Doctrine for Civil Engineering Support. 26 September 1995.
JSI 3820.01. Environmental Engineering Effects of DOD Actions. 28 September 1993.
JSI 3820.01A. Environmental Engineering Effects of DOD Actions. 16 January 1996.
FM 90-13/MCWP 3-17.1. River-Crossing Operations. 26 January 1998.
FM 100-19/FMFM 7-10. Domestic Support Operations. 1 July 1993.
FM 100-20/AFP 3-20. Military Operations in Low Intensity Conflict. 5 December 1990.
FM 101-5-1/MCRP 5-2A. Operational Terms and Graphics. 30 September 1997.
CD. Joint Service Pollution Technical Library (version 1.3). 1 August 1997.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PUBLICATIONS
DLA Booklet (with accompanying CD). Environmental Products. October 1997.
DOD Document. Overseas Environmental Baseline Guidance Document. October 1992.
DOD Regulation 4145.19-R-1. Hazardous Materials Storage and Handling Criteria.
DODD 4120.14. Environmental Pollution, Prevention, Control, and Abatement.
DODD 4700.4. Natural Resource Management Programs. 24 January 1989.
DODD 6050.7. Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Department of Defense Actions.

31 March 1979.
DODD 6050.16. Policy for Establishing and Implementing Environmental Standards at

Overseas Installations. 20 September 1991.
DODD 6490.2. Joint Medical Surveillance. 30 August 1997.
References-0
References
DODI 4150.7. DOD Pest Management Program. 22 April 1996.
DODI 4715.5. Management of Environmental Compliance at Overseas Installations. 22

April 1996.
DODI 4715.8. Environmental Remediation Policy for DOD Activities Overseas. 22 April
1996.
DODI 6490.3. Implementation and Application of Joint Medical Surveillance for

Deployment. 7 August 1997.
DODI 6055.1. DOD Safety and Occupational Health (SOH) Program. 19 August 1998.
OTHER FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS
EO 11987. Exotic Organisms. 24 May 1977.
EO 11988. Floodplain Management. 24 May 1977.
EO 11989. Off-Road Vehicles on Public Lands. 24 May 1977.
EO 11990. Protection of Wetlands. 24 May 1977.
EO 12088. Federal Compliance With Pollution Control Standards. 13 October 1978.
EO 12114. Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions. 4 January 1979.
EO 12580. Superfund Implementation. 23 January 1987.
EO 12856. Federal Compliance With Right-to-Know Laws and Pollution Prevention

Requirements. 3 August 1993.
EO 12898. Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations

and Low-Income Populations. 11 February 1994.
EO 12948. Amendment to Executive Order No. 12898. 30 January 1995.
EO 13101. Greening the Government Through Waste Prevention, Recycling, and Federal
Acquisition. 18 September 1998.
Federal Facilities Compliance Act (FFCA). 1992.
Title 29, CFR, part 1910. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).
December 1970.
Title 40, CFR, parts 259-355 and 761. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
1976 Amended 1984.
Title 49, CFR, parts 106-178. Hazardous Material Transportation and Uniform Safety
Act (HMTUSA). 1990.
References-1
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
ARMY PUBLICATIONS
After-Action Report. Operation Joint Endeavor.
Army Environmental Policy Institute. US Army Environmental Strategy into the 21st
Century. 1992.
Army Environmental Policy Institute. Environmental Trends – Policy Implications for

the US Army. March 1992.
AR 40-3. Medical Dental and Veterinary Care. 30 July 1999.
AR 40-5. Preventive Medicine. 15 October 1990.
AR 40-6. Medical Record Administration and Health Care Documentation. 3 May 1999.
AR-40-66. Medical Record Administration and Health Care Documentation. 3 May 1999.
AR 40-216. Neuropsychiatry and Mental Health. 10 August 1984.
AR 200-1. Environmental Protection and Enhancement. 21 February 1997.
AR 200-2. Environmental Effects of Army Actions. 23 December 1988.
AR 200-3. Natural Resources - Land, Forest, Wildlife Management. 28 February 1995.
AR 200-4. Cultural Resources Management. 01 October 1998.
AR 200-5. Pest Management. To be published within 6 months.
AR 350-4. Integrated Training Area Management. 1 November 1998.
AR 385-10. The Army Safety Program. 23 May 1988.
AR 420-49. Utilities Services. 28 April 1997.
ARTEP 5-145-32-MTP. Mission Training Plan for the Headquarters and Headquarters
Company, Engineer Battalion, Heavy Division/Corps. 19 July 1991.
CALL Newsletter 99-9. Integrating Military Environmental Protection. August 1999.
DA Form 2028. Recommended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms. February

1974.
DA PAM 200-1. April 1975.
DA PAM 200-4. Cultural Resources Management. 1 October 1996.
DA PAM 351-20. Army Correspondence Course Program.
FM 3-50. Smoke Operations. 4 December 1990.
2-References
References
FM 5-34. Engineer Field Data. 14 September 1987.
FM 5-116. Engineer Operations: Echelons Above Corp (EAC). 9 February 1999.
FM 5-170. Engineer Reconnaissance. 5 May 1998.
FM 7-10. The Infantry Rifle Company. 14 December 1990.
FM 8-9/NAVMED P-5059/AFJMAN 44-151, NATO Handbook on the Medical Aspects of

NBC Defensive Operations, AMED P-6 (B). 1 February 1996.
FM 8-10. Health Service Support in a Theater of Operations. 1 March 1991.
FM 8-10-7, Health Service Support in a Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical Environment,

22 April 1993, Change 1, 26 November 1996.
FM 8-10-17, Preventive Medicine Services. To be published within 6 months.
FM 8-10-18, Veterinary Service – Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures. 22 August 1997.
FM 8-33, Control of Communicable Diseases Manual. 9 April 1996.
FM 8-55. Planning for Health Service Support. 9 September 1994.
FM 8-284, Treatment of Biological Warfare Agent Casualties. To be published within 6

months.
FM 8-285, Treatment of Chemical Agent Casualties and Conventional Military Chemical

Injuries. 2 December 1995.
FM 10-23. Basic Doctrine for Army Field Feeding and Class I Operations Management.
18 April 1996.
FM 10-71. Petroleum Tank Vehicle Operations. 12 May 1978.
FM 20-32. Mine/Countermine Operations. 29 May 1998.
FM 21-10. Field Hygiene and Sanitation. 22 November 1988.
FM 21-10-1. Unit Field Sanitation Team. 11 October 1989.
FM 21-11. First Aid for the Soldier (with changes). 4 December 1991.
FM 22-100. Military Leadership. 31 July 1990.
FM 25-100. Training the Force. 15 November 1988.
FM 25-101. Battle Focused Training. 30 September 1990.
FM 27-10. The Law of Land Warfare. 18 July 1956.
FM 34-130. Intelligence Preparation of the Battlefield. 08 July 1994.
References-3
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
FM 43-5. Unit Maintenance Operations. 25 September 1988.
FM 71-1. Tank and Mechanized Infantry Company Team. 22 November 1988.
FM 100-1. The Army. 14 June 1994.
FM 100-5. Operations. 14 June 1993.
FM 100-10. Combat Service Support. 3 October 1995.
FM 100-14. Risk Management. 23 April 1998.
FM 100-17. Mobilization, Deployment, Redeployment, Demobilization. 28 October 1992.
FM 100-22. Installation Management. 11 October 1994.
FM 100-23. Peace Operations. 30 December 1994.
FM 101-5. Staff Organization and Operations. 31 May 1997.
FM 101-5-2. US Army Reports and Message Formats. 29 June 1999.
GTA 5-8-3. Hazardous Material Spill Procedures. April 1998.
TC 5-400. Unit Leader’s Handbook for Environmental Stewardship. 25 July 1997.
TM 5-1940-277-10. Operator’s Manual for Boat, Bridge Erection, Twin Set, Aluminum
Hull, Model USC 80MK-1 and USC 80MK-2. December 1981.
TM 5-5420-209-12. Operator’s and Organizational Maintenance Manual for Improved

Float Bridge (Ribbon Bridge). May 1980.
TM 5-803-2. Environmental Protection: Planning in the Noise Environment. 15 June

1978.
TM 38-410. Storage and Handling of Hazardous Materials. 13 January 1999.
US Army Corps of Engineers Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency. Directory of

Environmental Training Courses. May 1993.
US Army Environmental Center. Commander’s Guide to Environmental Management.

March 1998.
US Army Environmental Training Support Center. Defense Services Directory of

Environmental Courses. July 1996.
US Army Environmental Center. US Army Environmental Training Master Plan

(AETMP). 17 December 1992.
Army Environmental Policy Institute. US Army Environmental Strategy into the 21st
Century. 1992.
4-References
References
AIR FORCE PUBLICATIONS
Air Force Environmental Handbook for Contingency Operations. August 1996.
AFI 32-7006. Environmental Program in Foreign Countries. 29 April 1994.
AFI 32-7061. The Environmental Impact Analysis Process. 24 January 1995.
NAVY PUBLICATIONS
NWP 4-11. Environmental Protection. 01 March 1999.
MARINE CORPS PUBLICATIONS
Commanders Guide to Environmental Compliance and Prevention.
MCWP 5-1. Marine Corps Planning Process, 5 January 2000.
MCO P1200.7S. MOS Manual. 21 April 1997.
MCO P5090.2A. Environmental Compliance and Protection Manual. July 1998.
PCN 50100380600. USMC Environmental Awareness Guide. 1997.
PCN 5000380700. USMC Environmental Campaign Plan. 1997
INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATIONS
Article 54 of the Geneva Convention. 12 August 1949.
Article 55 of the Geneva Convention. 12 August 1949.
1989 Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes

and Their Disposal, with Amendments. 22 September 1995.
ENMOD Convention. 18 May 1977.
Protocol I Addition to the 1949 Geneva Convention. 1977.
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
Schumaker, Aileen. A Guide to Hazardous Materials Management: Physical

Characteristics, Federal Regulations, and Response Alternatives. New York: Quorum
Books. 1988.
References-5
INDEX
acceptability, 2-9 camouflage, 2-13, 2-25, A-10, E-4
accident risk, 2-7, 2-17, 2-22 catastrophic, 2-20, 2-21, 2-22, 2-23, 2-24
accumulation site, H-2 chemical agent resistant coding (CARC), 2-
acquisition services, 5-12 20, 7-2
aerial points of departure (APODs), 5-12 chief of staff (CofS), 1-12, 1-13
after-action review (AAR), 1-11, 1-18, 2-3, 2- Clean Air Act (CAA), A-6
25, 2-26, 3-6 Clean Water Act (CWA), A-6
air quality, 1-7, collateral damage, 1-13, 2-1, 2-22, 4-4, 4-6,
AR 200-1, 1-6, 1-10, 1-16, 6-5, 6-6, 6-8, 6-9, B-2, B-4
6-11, 6-12, 5-9, A-2, A-4, A-20, C-2 combat service support,
AR 200-2, 5-9, 5-10, 6-11 A-3, A-5, A-12 commander, joint task force (CJTF), 2-11
AR 200-3, A-3 commander’s guidance, 1-5, 1-18, 2-4, 2-9, 2-
AR 200-4, A-3, A-5 10, 4-2, 4-7
AR 200-5, A-4 commander’s intent, 2-7, 2-8, 2-18
AR 420-49, A-4 compliance, ii, 1-3 through 1-11, 1-15
AR 420-76, A-4 through 1-18, 2-16, 3-7, 5-5 through 5-9, 5-
Archaeological Resources Protection Act 14, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-5, 6-6, 6-11, 6-12, 6-15, 6-
(ARPA), A-3 16, 6-17, A-2, A-3, A-4, A-5, A-10, A-14, A-18,
area of operation,1-12, 4-4,7-1,G-1, A-19, A-22, B-4, C-2, C-3, C-5, D-1, D-5,E-6,
Army correspondence course program H-1
(ACCP), Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Army environmental response line, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA),
Army medical laboratory (AML), 1-14 A-8, A-19
Army regulation(s), ii, A-2 comprehensive environmental training and
asbestos, 2-15, 5-4,5-8, A-2, A-6, A-17, A-18, education (CETEP), 1-17
H-3 conservation, 1-3, 1-7, 1-8, 2-13, 5-2, 5-3, A-
asbestos management, 5-4 15, A-16, A-17, D-1
assistant chief of staff, G1 (S1), personnel, 1- continental US (CONUS), 1-15, 5-9, 5-12
12 contingency operations, 1-8, 2-11, 5-13, 5-14,
assistant chief of staff, G2 (S2), intelligence, 6-14
1-12 conventions, 1-15, 6-16
assistant chief of staff, G3 (S3), operations, coordinating staff, 1-12
1-13 corps real estate support teams (CREST), 2-
assistant chief of staff, G4 (S4), logistics, 1- 6
13 courses of action (COA), 2-2, 2-5, 2-9, 2-10,
assistant chief of staff, G5 (S5), civil-military 2-18, 2-25, 7-1, 7-2, F-2
operations, 1-13, 1-14 critical, 1-1, 1-10, 1-13, 1-14, 1-16, 1-18, 2-1,
2-2, 2-5, 2-6, 2-7, 2-8, 2-10, 2-11, 2-12, 2-21,
base camp assistance/assessment team 2-22, 2-23, 2-24, 4-1, 4-2, 4-6, 5-1, 5-8, 5-11,
(BCAT), 1-10, D-2 5-15, 6-10, 6-16, 7-2, A-9, B-4, D-2, D-3
base camp coordination agency (BCCA) , 1- cultural resources management plan
10, D-2 (CRMP), 5-4, 5-9, 5-11
Basel Convention, A-21 cultural resources(s), 1-1, 1-6, 1-7, 1-8, 2-1,
batteries, 5-2, 6-5, 6-15, 6-16, C-4, C-6, C-16, 2-18, 2-19, 4-6, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-11, 6-2
C-17, H-3 cultural resource protection, 5-2, 5-3
battle focused training, i, 3-1, 3-7 customer assistance office,
battlespace, 2-1,2-7
DA PAM 200-1, A-5
C2, 2-2, 2-25 DA PAM 200-4, A-5
Index-0
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
decision-making, i, vi, 1-6, 1-13, 1-14, 2-1, 2- environmental compliance evaluation

5, 2-7, 2-9, 2-16, 2-18, 2-26, 4-3, 5-12, A-12 (ECE), 3-7
defense environmental network and environmental compliance officer (ECO), 1-
information exchange (DENIX), D-4, D-5 16, 6-3, 6-6, 6-12, 6-13, 6-16, 6-17, A-2, A-16,
defense logistics agency (DLA), 1-13, 2-13 D-1, E-1, H-1
defense reutilization and marketing office environmental concern, 1-4, 2-7, 2-10, 4-4, 5-
(DRMO), 1-10, 1-13, 5-7, 5-8, 5-14, 6-6, 6-15, 14, A-13, A-19, E-1, E-2, E-3
B-7, C-4, C-7, C-10 through C-17, C-21, D-1, environmental conditions, 2-7, 2-12, 2-14, 2-
D-3 15, 2-17, 3-3, 3-4, 7-1, E-1
degradation, 1-2, 1-3, 2-13, 2-19, 4-2, 5-11, environmental conditions report (ECR), 2-
A-1 15, E-3
demobilization, 2-17, 2-18 environmental consideration(s), i, vi, vii, viii,
demolition, 2-17, 2-22, 2-21, 5-4, H-8 1-9, 1-11, 1-12, 1-14, 1-17, 1-18, 1-19, 2-1, 2-
Department of Defense (DOD), iii, 1-4, 1-13, 16 thru 2-18, 2-25, 2-26, 2-27, 3-1 thru 3-8,
2-3, 3-7, 5-7, 5-11, 5-13, 5-14, 6-13, 7-2, 7-5A- 4-1, 4-3 through 4-8, 5-9, 5-12, 5-13, 5-156-1,
1, A-2, A-4, A-8, A-9, A-10, A-12, A-15 6-16, A-2, A-3, A-5, B-1, B-3 thru B-6, B-8,
deployment, vi, 1-8, 1-14, 2-6, 2-7, 2-8, 2-11, E-1, F-2, G-1
2-16, 2-25, 5-1, 5-4, 5-9, 5-10, 5-12, 5-13, 6-1, environmental damage, vi, 1-4, 1-13, 1-14, 1-
6-14, 6-16, 7-1, 7-2, A-2, A-11, B-1, D-3 15, 1-18, 2-3, 2-20, 2-22, 4-1, 4-4, 4-8, 5-13, 6-
directorate of logistics (DOL), 1-10, 5-7, 5-14, 4, A-2
6-6, D-1, D-2, D-3 environmental duties,
directorate of logistics/G4, 1-13, A-13 environmental effect(s), 1-4, 1-17, 1-18, 4-3,
directorate of plans, training, and 4-4, 5-14, A-19, B-10, B-12, B-13, B-14, B-17
mobilization (DPTM)/G3, 5-7, 5-12, 5-14, D-2 environmental engineer,1-16, 2-14
directorate of public works (DPW), 1-9, 5-8, environmental ethic, vi, 1-5, 1-9, 1-17, 3-6, 6-
5-9, 5-10, A-2, A-3, A-4, A-11, D-1, D-3 3, A-8, C-6
disposal, 1-13, 1-15, 1-16, 2-11, 2-12, 2-13, 2- environmental factor(s), vi, vi, 1-11, 1-12, 1-
15, 2-17, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-8, 6-5, 6-6, 6-12, 6- 15, 1-17, 2-12, 2-16, 2-26, 3-3, 4-1, 4-2, A-13,
13, 6-15, 6-16, A-4, A-6, A-10, A-12, A-15, A- B-2
18, A-20, A-21, D-3, E-5, H-3, H-5 environmental issue(s), 1-1, 1-12, 1-14, 1-16,
during operations, ii, 1-13, 3-5, 4-7, A-11, E- 3-6, 5-9, 5-12, 5-14, 6-3, 6-4, 6-12, A-1, C-1,
3 C-17, H-8
environmental law(s), 1-4, 1-6, 1-11, 1-14,1-
Emergency Planning and Community Right 15, 1-17, 1-18, 2-6, 2-17, 2-26, 3-7, 5-6, 5-136-
to Know Act (EPCRA), A-8, A-9, A-19 1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-11, 6-12, 6-16, 6-17, A-1, A-2, A-
Endangered Species Act (ESA), A-9 10, A-20, A-21, D-2, E-1, H-1
engineer coordinator (ENCOORD), 1-12, 1- environmental management office (EMO), 5-
13, 1-14, 1-15, 2-10, 2-16 4, 5-6, 5-14, E-5, H-7 , H-8
environmental annex, 2-13, 2-16, 2-25, 4-3 environmental modification (ENMOD), 4-5,
environmental appendix, ii, 2-16, B-1 A-21
environmental assistance, ii, 1-9, 5-14, 5-15, environmental noise management, 5-4
6-1, 6-3, D-1, D-3 environmental planning, ii, 1-12, 2-1, 2-11,
environmental baseline survey (EBS), 1-11, 2-12, 4-6, E-1
1-13, 2-6,2-8, 2-12, 2-14, 2-15, 2-16, E-2, E-3, environmental program(s), i, 1-5, 1-8, 1-9, 1-
E-6 11, 1-16, 1-18, 2-26, 3-2, 3-7, 5-15, 5-1, 5-2, 5-
environmental benefit(s), 2-18 3, 5-5, 5-6, 5-14, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 6-7, 6-11,
environmental compliance, ii, 1-13, 1-4, 1-9, 6-12, 6-13, 6-17, A-2, A-18, D-1, H-1
1-10, 1-11, 1-16, 3-7, 5-6, 5-14, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, environmental protection, I, v, vi, 1-2 thru 1-
6-11, 6-12, A-5, A-22 15, 2-1, 2-2, 2-4, 2-6, 2-8, 2-9, 2-14, 2-19, 2-
environmental compliance assessment 22, 2-23, 3-11, 3-13, H-2
system (ECAS), 3-7, 5-14, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 6-
6-11, 6-12, 6-17, H-1 1, 6-2, 6-5, 6-8, 6-11, A-22
Index 1
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
environmental regulation(s), 5-13, 6-2, 6-16, force protection, 1-14, 1-11, 1-18, 1-19, 2-1,
A-1, A-9, A-17, A-18, A-20, H-1 2-17, 3-1, 4-1, 4-5, 4-6, G-3
environmental resource(s), vi,1-2, 1-6, 1-13, fragmentary orders (FRAGOs), 2-16
1-14, 2-1, 5-8
environmental responsibilities, i, 1-9, 1-10, G1, 1-12, 5-14
1-12, 1-14, 5-4, 5-5 G2, 1-12, 1-15, 2-5, 2-7, 2-10
environmental stewardship, 1-4, 1-6, 1-9, 1- G3, 1-12, 1-13, 2-7, 2-8, 2-10, 5-14, 6-11, D-2
11, 1-17, 3-6, 5-5, 6-3 G4, 1-13, 1-14, 2-5, 2-10, 5-8, 5-14, 6-10, 6-
environmental threats, vii, 1-2, 1-15, 1-18, 4- 11, A-11, B-7, D-1, D-2
2 G5, 1-13, 1-14
environmental management, vi, 1-9, 2-11, 3- gray water, 1-11
3, 3-7, 5-6, 6-10, D-4
environmental protection, iv, vi, vii, viii, 1-1, hazardous material (HM), 1-7, 1-13, 1-15
1-3, 1-4, 1-6, 1-7, 1-9, 1-11 through 1-14, 1- through 1-18, 2-11 through 2-14, 2-17, 2-20,
17, 1-19, 2-11 through 2-16, 3-2, 3-3, 4-2, 4-3, 2-21, 3-4 through 3-7, 5-2, 5-4, 5-7, 5-8, 5-12,
4-5, 4-6, 4-7, 4-8, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-6, 5-12, 5- 6-2 through 6-8, 6-10 through 6-17, 7-1, 7-2,
13, 6-1, 6-17, A-1, D-3, D-4, E-1 7-3, A-2, A-6, A-8 through A-11, A-14, A-16,
environmental-related risk, ii, 2-1, 2-2, 2-16, A-19, B-6, B-7, B-8, B-11, B-15, B-17, C-2, C-
2-23, 2-24, 2-26, 5-9, C-18, F-1, G-1, G-3 4 through C-12, C-15, C-18, C-20, C-23, D-2,
EO 11987, A-18 D-3, E-2, H-2, H-3, H-4, H-7
EO 11988, A-18 Hazardous Materials Transportation Act
EO 11990, A-18 (HMTA), A-12
EO 12088, A-18 hazardous substance management system
EO 12114, A-19 (HSMS), 6-12
EO 12580, A-19 hazardous waste (HW), 1-6, 1-7, 1-8, 1-11, 1-
EO 12856, A-19 13, 1-15 through 1-18, 2-7, 2-11, 2-12, 2-14,
EO 12873, A-19 2-15, 2-17, 2-22, 2-21, 3-4, 3-6, 3-7, 5-2, 5-4,
EO 12898, A-19 5-6, 5-7, 5-12, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4, 6-5, 6-6, 6-7, 6-8,
EO 13007, A-19 6-10 through 6-17, A-2, A-4, A-8, A-10, A-11,
ethical implications, 1-4, 4-2 A-12, A-15, A-16, A-19, A-21, B-5, B-7, B-8,
evaluation, 2-10, 2-20, 2-26, 3-2, 3-5, 3-6, 3- B-16, B-17, B-18, D-1, D-3, E-2, E-5, H-2, H-
7, 5-10, 6-1, 6-2, A-12, C-18, G-3 3, H-7
executive agent(s), 5-13, A-20, B-8 hazardous substance control, 5-2
executive officer (XO), 1-12, 2-8, 2-10 HAZCOM, 1-15, 5-8, 5-14, 6-4, 6-7, 6-8
executive orders, ii, A-5, A-18 host nation (HN), 1-4, 1-6, 1-7, 1-14, 2-3, 2-
explosive ordnance disposal (EOD), 5-3 13, 2-17, 2-26, 3-7, 5-13, 6-16, 6-17, 6-14, A-
1, A-20, B-5, D-4, E-1, H-1, H-8
Federal Facilities Compliance Act (FFCA), human waste, 1-11, E-5
6-2, A-5, A-10, A-21 HW/HM (MOS 9954) Marine, 6-12
federal laws, ii, 5-12, A-5 HW coordinator, 1-11, 5-7, 6-2, 6-11, D-1
field sanitation, 2-21, 2-25, 5-8, 7-3, A-10, B-
6, G-1 industrial operations, 5-12, 7-3
final governing standards (FGS), 1-10. 5-11, inspection(s), 1-16, 5-6, 5-8, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3, 6-4,
5-13, 6-3, 6-11, 6-17, A-20, B-2, B-10, B-11 6-11, H-1
finding of no significant impact (FONSI), 5- installation restoration program (IRP), 5-12,
10 A-8
fire department, 5-14, 6-7, 6-10, A-9, A-16, installations and logistics department,
C-3, C-5, C-15, C-20, C-21, D-3 headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC), iii
five-step process, G-1 integrated natural resource management
force health protection, vi, 1-4, 1-11, 1-18,1- plan (INRMP), 5-4, 5-11
19, 1-19, 4-3, G-3 integrated training area management
force projection, 5-12 (ITAM), 5-1, 5-4, 5-7, 5-11, 5-12, A-4, D-2
2 Index
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
intelligence preparation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA),

battlefield/battlespace (IPB), 1-12, 1-15, 2-5, 2-17, 4-6, 5-9, 5-10, 5-14, A-3, A-4, A-5, A-12,
2-7, 2-10, 4-3, 7-2 A-13
international laws, ii, A-21, A-22 national ethos, 1-3
National Guard (NG), 1-9, 6-16, 6-17, A-2,
joint environmental management board D-1
(JEMB), 2-11 National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA),
joint operational planning and execution A-3, A-4, A-14
system (JOPES), 2-10, 2-16, 4-3 national policy, A-14, A-20
national security, 1-1, 1-2, 1-3, 1-6, 1-18, 4-2
Kyoto Accord, A-21 national training center (NTC),
Native American Grave Protection and
land condition trend analysis (LCTA), 5-11 Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), A-3, A-4, A-13
land management, A-3, A-4, A-20 natural environment, v, 1-1, 1-4 through 1-
law enforcement, A-5 6, 1-18, 2-26, 4-5, 4-6, 5-4, 5-13, A-21
local law, 1-10, 1-17, 6-16, A-20, A-22 natural resource(s), iv, vi, vii, 1-1 through 1-
local noise ordinances, 5 1-8, 1-18, 2-13, 5-6, 5-11, 5-12, 6-16, A-2,
logistics civil augmentation program A-14
(LOGCAP), iii, 1-13 natural resources management program,
London Dumping Convention, A-21 near-term planning, 2-11, 2-26, 3-4, G-3
long-range planning, 3-2, 3-3 negligible, 2-24
Noise Control Act (NCA), A-14, A-15
maintenance officer, 1-15 nonrenewable resources, 1-8, 5-2
major Army command (MACOM), 5-6, 5-7, nuclear, biological, chemical (NBC), 1-14, 3-
6-1, 6-3 5, 6-15, 7-1, 7-3
management officer,
marginal, 2-24 occupational safety and health act (OSHA)
Marine Corps regulations, ii, A-1, A-2 5-7, 5-8, 6-7, 6-13
Marine environmental home page, D-4 Oil Pollution Act (OPA), A-14
Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), A- operation order (OPORD), 1-9, 2-11, 2-13, 2-
11 15, 2-16, 2-25, 2-2, 3-5, 4-3, E-1
MCO P1200.7S, 6-12 operation plan (OPLAN), 1-9, 2-11, 2-13, 2-
MCO P5090.2, 1-6, 2-17, 5-9, 5-10, A-5 16, 2-25, 4-3, 5-13, E-1
medical waste(s), 5-4, E-1 operational analysis,
METT-TC, 2-21, 4-5, 7-4, E-1, F-2 operational implications,
military decision-making process (MDMP), operational mission(s), vi
1-13, 1-19, 2-1 through 2-4, 2-11, 2-13, 2-16, operational planning, 2-11, 4-6
2-26, 4-3, 4-5, 4-6, 6-16 operations security (OPSEC), 2-25
military environmental protection, iv, vi, operations tempo (OPTEMPO), 5-12
viii4-2, 5-1, 5-2 outside continental US (OCONUS), 1-10, 5-
military munitions rule, A-16 9, 5-14, 6-3, 6-11, 6-17, A-20, D-3
military necessity, vi, 4-4, 4-7 overseas environmental baseline guidance
military occupational specialty (MOS), 1-12, document (OEBGD), 2-3, 5-11, 5-13, 6-3
1-16, 1-17, 6-12
military operations, vi, 1-5, 1-18, 2-1, 4-1, 4- paint, 1-15, 2-15, 2-20, 5-2, 6-8, 6-13, A-6
2, 4-4, 5-9, A-5, A-6, A-21 penalty, A-22
military strategy, 1-3 Persian Gulf War, 4-4, 7-4
mission analysis, 2-9, 2-13, 2-19, 4-3 personal staff,
mission essential task list (METL), 1-17 pesticides, 2-11, 2-20, 5-2, 7-3, A-10, D-2
mobilization operations, petroleum, oil, lubricants (POL), 2-14, 4-5, 5-
Montreal Protocol, A-21 4, 5-7, 5-12, 6-14, 6-15, 6-17, A-11, B-5, D-2,
E-2, E-5, H-2, H-7
Index 3
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
points of contact, 1-11 S3, 1-13, 5-14, 6-11

pollution prevention, 1-5, 1-6, 1-11, 1-13, 5- S4, 1-13, 5-14
2, 5-4, 6-4, 6-6, 6-8, 6-16, A-17, A-19, A-20, S5, 1-13
D-1, H-1 Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), A-16
post-operations guidelines, ii, E-6 safety, vi, , vii, viii, 1-2, 1-3, 1-4, 1-10, 1-11,
post-hostilities, 1-12,1-18, 1-19, 2-1, 2-2, 2-7, 2-12, 2-14, 2-
precombat checks, 3-5 17, 2-26, 3-1, 3-4, 3-5, 3-7, 4-1, 4-6, 5-5, 5-7,
preexecution checks, 3-4, 3-5 5-8, 5-14, 6-5, 6-7, 6-9, 6-10, 6-12, 6-14, 7-3,
pre-operations guidelines, ii, E-1 A-8, A-11, A-12, D-1, D-2, E-1, E-2, F-2, G-3,
prescribed load list (PLL), 6-14 H-7
prevention, 1-5, 1-6, 1-7, 1-8, 1-11, 1-13, 2- Sikes Act (SA), A-17
25, 2-13, 3-4, 3-7, 5-2, 5-4, 6-4, 6-5, 6-6, 6-8, situation template (SITTEMP), 2-5
6-11, 6-14, 6-16, A-2, A-6, A-9, A-10, A-14, A- solid waste, 1-7, 1-13, 5-4, 6-12, A-4, A-10, A-
15, A-17, A-19, A-20, A-21, C-24, D-1, H-1, 15, A-16, H-4
H-3, H-4, H-7 special staff, 1-12, 1-13, 1-14, 2-3
preventive maintenance checks and services spill prevention, 1-13, 2-13, 2-25, 3-4, 3-7, 5-
(PMCS), 3-4,, 3-5 4, 6-5, 6-6, 6-9, 6-11, 6-13, 6-14, A-6, A-9, H-
preventive medicine, 1-14, 2-14, 2-16, 2-17, 1, H-4, H-5, H-7
3-3, 5-5, 5-8, 6-10, A-7, A-10, D-2, H-7 spill response, 2-13, 3-4, 6-9, 6-10, 6-14, 6-
Protocol I, A-21 15, B-6, B-7, C-3, C-7, C-15, C-19, C-20, C-
public affairs officer (PAO), 1-12, 1-5, 5-8, D- 21, D-3, E-1, E-2, E-5
2 spill(s), 1-13, 1-5, 1-18, 2-11, 2-13, 2-17, 2-20,
2-21, 2-25, 3-4, 3-6, 3-7, 4-2, 5-2, 5-4, 5-8, 5-
radon reduction, A-2 12, 5-14, 6-4, 6-5, 6-6, 6-9 through 6-16, A-6
reconnaissance, 1-14, 2-7, 2-9, 2-14, 3-3, 3-4, through A-9, A-11, A-14, A-15, A-16, B-5, B-
7-4, B-5, E-1, E-2 6, B-7, B-17, B-18, B-20, C-1, C-3, C-6, C-7,
record of decision (ROD), 5-10 C-15, C-19, C-20, C-21, D-3, E-1, E-2, E-3, E-
recovery operations, G-2 5, E-6, G-3, H-1, H-3, H-4 through H-7
recycling, 1-6, 1-8, 1-18, 5-3, 6-4, 6-9, 6-12, staff estimate(s), 1-11, 2-3, 2-11, 2-12
A-12, A-15, A-16, A-18, A-20, D-1, H-2, H-4, staff judge advocate (SJA), 1-12, 1-14, 1-15,
H-5 2-16, A-2, A-22, D-2
redeployment, 1-13, 5-12, 5-13, A-18, G-2, H- staff planning, 1-13, 2-12
7 standing operating procedure(s) (SOP), 1-4,
refueling, 2-21, 2-25, 6-15, E-4, E-5, G-1, G- 1-9, 1-11, 1-12, 1-17, 1-18, 2-3, 2-13 through
2, H-7 2-16, 2-25, 3-3, 3-4, 5-13, 5-15, 6-1, 6-4, 6-5,
renewable resources, 1-2, 1-8 6-12, 6-14 through 6-17, A-15, A-16, E-1, E-
reserve component (RC), 3-4, 6-16, A-2 5, F-2, G-1, H-1, H-2, H-6
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act state area command (STARC), 1-9, 6-16, 6-
(RCRA), 2-13, 3-7, 6-2, 6-6, 6-11, 6-13, A-5, 17, D-1
A-10, A-12, A-15, A-16, A-22 state laws, A-20
restoration, vi, 5-9, 5-12, A-2 stewardship, 1-4, 1-5, 1-6, 1-9, 1-11, 1-17, 3-
risk assessment, iv, 1-14, 1-16, 2-23, 2-24, 2- 1, 3-6, 5-1, 5-5, 5-6, 6-3, A-1, A-2
26, 3-3, 3-4, E-1, E-2, F-2, G-2 storage areas, 1-15, H-2, H-3
risk management, i, iv, viii, 1-1, 1-12, 1-14, strategic end state, 4-1, 4-2, 4-5
1-19, 2-9, 2-10, 2-15 through 2-20, 2-26, 3- strategic implications, 4-2
3,4-6, 7-2, 7-4, 7-5, A-11, A-15, F-1, F-2, G-1, strategic resources, 1-2
G-2, G-3, subordinate leaders, 1-4, 1-9, 1-17, 1-18
risk management worksheet, ii, G-1, G-2 suitability, 2-9
rules of engagement (ROE), 2-18, G-1 support planning, 2-11, 5-9
surgeon, 1-12, 1-14, 2-3, 2-16, 7-1, 7-4, 7-5,
S1, 1-12, 5-14 D-2
S2, 1-12, 5-14
4 Index
FM 3-100.4/MCRP 4-11B
tactical implications, 4-2 7-5

tactical risk, 2-7, 2-17 US Army Engineer School (USAES),
Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), A-17 US Army Training and Doctrine Command
transportation officer, 1-15 (TRADOC), iv
treaties, ii, 1-4, 1-15, 5-2, A-1, A-21 US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 6-2
unit environmental SOP, 6-12 vehicle maintenance, C-7, E-5

unit management practices, 6-12
unit planning, 2-11, 2-15, 3-2 washrack(s), C-7, H-4, H-5, H-6
unit self-assessment, ii, 6-12, 6-17 waste management practices,
unnecessary impacts, 4-4 water resources management, 5-4
unusual incidents, 6-13 wetlands, 2-15, 2-21, 2-25, 5-11, 5-12, A-6, A-
US Army Center for Health Promotion and 7, A-18, D-1, E-3, E-4, G-1, H-7
Preventive Medicine (USACHPPM), 1-14,
Index 5
FM 3-100.4
MCRP 4-11B
15 JUNE 2000
By Order of the Secretary of the Army:
ERIC K. SHINSEKI
General, United States Army
Official: Chief of Staff
Administrative Assistant to the

Secretary of the Army
0014001
DISTRIBUTION:
Active Army, Army National Guard, and U.S. Army Reserve: Electronic Means
Only.
By Direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps:
J.E. RHODES
Lieutenant General, US Marine Corps
Commanding General
Marine corps Combat Development Command
PIN: 078352-000

fm3-100 4 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

fm3-100 4 PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

fm3-100 4 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

FM 3-100.

DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

Remove old pages Insert new pages

iii through vi iii through vi

2. A bar star (¶) marks new or changed material.

3. File this transmittal sheet in front of the publication.

DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTION. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

By Order of the Secretary of the Army:

Field Manual Headquarters

Marine Corps Reference Publication Headquarters

Environmental Considerations in Military Operations

APPENDIX H Unit Environmental Self-Assessment....................................................................H-1

SCOPE AND APPLICABILITY

Unless this publication states otherwise, masculine pronouns do not refer

This publication is intended only to improve internal management of the

The proponent of this publication is HQTRADOC. Send comments and

directly to Commandant, US Army Engineer School, ATTN: ATSE-DOT-DI,

• Considering the environment in planning and decision-making in

• Protecting the environment of home stations and training areas as a

• Using environmental risk assessment and environmental management

• Instilling an environmental ethic in soldiers and Marines.

• Understanding the linkages between environmental protection issues and

Military environmental protection is the application and integration of all aspects

The above actions identify environmental protection as an important undertaking

Military actions, at the dawn of the twenty-first century, are undergoing

This requirement is new and fundamentally different from the traditional,

In regions where increasing numbers of people occupy a finite and densely

National recognition of environmental threats to the population’s safety and

American citizens value and demand a clean and healthy environment. US

Integration between civilian and military application of environmental

HOW TO USE THIS MANUAL

• Guidance on how to interface with the installation and respective

• Guidance on establishing and assessing a unit program.

• Guidance on the impact of environmental conditions on the health of

The appendixes provide a more in-depth look at information that supports

Environmental Protection and Military Operations

The US military’s primary mission is to defend the US—its people, its

1-1. Strategic factors influencing international security and stability have

CONTEXT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES AS A CAUSE OF CONFLICT

1-4. Environmental degradation, natural disasters, famines, health epidemics,

1-5. In both examples, environmental resource scarcity, caused by degradation

1-6. Environmental threats intensify regional instability. In Haiti, dwindling

1-8. The actions associated with developing a national infrastructure, such as

National Strategic and Security Interests

1-13. Countries rely on natural resources to achieve political ends. A country

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AS A NATIONAL ETHOS

1-15. As environmental protection becomes increasingly important to Americans,

1-16. Operational readiness depends on sufficient land for training individuals

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AS AN IMPACT ON SAFETY, FORCE PROTECTION, AND

1-17. Environmental protection tends to be viewed according to its effect on the

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AS A REGULATORY REQUIREMENT

1-19. The sources of environmental laws influencing the actions of US military

ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS AS A FUNCTION OF ARMY VALUES

1-20. From every philosophical or moral perspective, environmental stewardship

1-21. Considering the environmental effects of training, operations, and logistics

training, and facilities operations. In short, it must be an institutional and

“Everyone must protect and conserve the natural environment as an