Joint and Indivisible Obligations
Joint and Indivisible Obligations
Joint and Indivisible Obligations
Art 1210 – indivisibility of an obligation does not give rise to solidarity, neither solidarity will give
rise to indivisibility
o Why? Those 2 concepts refer to 2 diff situations
Solidarity refers to tie (vinculum) that binds the subjects
Indivisibility refers to object or prestation; if prestation is capable of partial
performance, it is divisible; if not capable of partial performance, it is indivisible
Joint- because subjects are plural; Indivisible – because the prestation is incapable of partial
performance
o Example (joint debtor) : A and B – obliged to deliver a specific cow to X
o Example (joint creditor): A obliged to deliver a specific cow to X and Y; law presumes that XY
are joint creditors
o Difficulty: while obligation is joint, each one of the debtors is liable for his share or portion,
not the entire; problem is, the object is incapable of partial performance (you cannot deliver
just the head of the cow)
For obligation to be performed, that requires the collective action of joint debtors
or creditor
Ex. A and B – sold particular car to X – were not able to deliver car on agreed date;
so X sent demand only to A to compel A to make the delivery; will that make A in
delay? No, because demand is not effective; if only addressed to A, he cannot
perform the entire obligation because he is merely joint and liable for his portion of
indebtedness; hence, X will have to address demand to both A and B
EX. A – Obligation to deliver particular car to X and Y; only X made the demand, will
that put A in delay? NO – because X cannot collect the entire credit; he is only
entitled to portion of credit; this will require collective action of XY
In case of insolvency of one; his share is separate and distinct from the others
In case of breach of one of the debtors, what will be the remedy of creditor? A and
B – ready to put out share but C is not; hence, can’t deliver the car. What will be the
remedy of X?
If specific performance, since the obligation is to deliver a determinate
thing the remedy is to compel ABC to make delivery, then creditor will have
to sue all joint debtors
Obligation may be converted into payment of damages (recovery of
damages) – obligation will cease to be joint and indivisible, it will now
become a joint and divisible obligation.
1. Can creditor sue only A or B or C? theoretically, YES, but subject to
Rules of Procedure
2. Damages can only be recovered from erring joint debtor