Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 96 views

    Lab Report Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Lucienne Iriana
    This document provides a rubric for grading laboratory reports with criteria in five areas: theoretical background, experimental methodology, results and discussion, conclusions, and mechanics. Each criteria is rated on a scale from poor to very good. For example, a good theoretical background fully explains the concepts, while a poor one does not clearly explain them. This provides guidelines for students to understand what quality is expected in each section of a laboratory report.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Lab Report Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Lucienne Iriana
    96 views1 page
    This document provides a rubric for grading laboratory reports with criteria in five areas: theoretical background, experimental methodology, results and discussion, conclusions, and mechanics. Each criteria is rated on a scale from poor to very good. For example, a good theoretical background fully explains the concepts, while a poor one does not clearly explain them. This provides guidelines for students to understand what quality is expected in each section of a laboratory report.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document provides a rubric for grading laboratory reports with criteria in five areas: theoretical background, experimental methodology, results and discussion, conclusions, and mechanics. Each criteria is rated on a scale from poor to very good. For example, a good theoretical background fully explains the concepts, while a poor one does not clearly explain them. This provides guidelines for students to understand what quality is expected in each section of a laboratory report.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    96 views1 page

    Lab Report Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Lucienne Iriana
    This document provides a rubric for grading laboratory reports with criteria in five areas: theoretical background, experimental methodology, results and discussion, conclusions, and mechanics. Each criteria is rated on a scale from poor to very good. For example, a good theoretical background fully explains the concepts, while a poor one does not clearly explain them. This provides guidelines for students to understand what quality is expected in each section of a laboratory report.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    You are on page 1of 1

    School of Chemical, Biological, and Materials Engineering and Sciences

    MAPUA UNIVERSITY

    RUBRIC FOR GRADING LABORATORY REPORT

    Criteria Good to Very Good Fair Poor


    (80 < Rating < 100) (60 < Rating < 80) (10 < Rating < 60)
    Theoretical Background The theoretical background and The theoretical background and The theoretical background
    concept were explained concept were explained good but and concept were not
    (15%) sufficiently. lacks some details. explained well.
    Experimental The experimental methodology The experimental methodology The experimental methodology
    was detailed and can be easily was explained but some parts was not organized and poorly
    Methodology (30%) understood. are ambiguous. developed.

    Results and Discussion The results were discussed very The results were discussed well The results were not discussed
    detailed and were related to the but lacks some details related to properly and lacks organization in
    (40%) theoretical background. The the concepts and theoretical the discussion. The expected
    possible sources of errors were background. Only identified the discussions were not met.
    identified and suggested possible sources of errors.
    solutions to avoid it.

    Conclusions (10%) The conclusion of the report was The conclusion of the report was The report failed to provide
    well defined and provided defined and discussed but lacks proper conclusions and
    recommendations to improve the proper recommendations to recommendations.
    experiment. improve the experiment.
    Mechanics (5%) There are no grammatical and There are some grammatical and The report contains many
    spelling errors. The references are spelling errors. Only some of the grammatical and spelling errors.
    properly cited. The page limit (6- references were properly cited. No references were included. The
    10 pages) was achieved. The page limit was met. number of pages did not meet
    the minimum number.
    This rubric is a modified version of iRubric: Journal Article Critique Rubric (https://www.rcampus.com/rubricshowc.cfm?sp=yes&code=A22B44)

    Prepared by Joseph Albert M. Mendoza and Peter Matthew T. Fowler for CH117L (2Q2021)

    You might also like