Literary works are typically characterized by three things:
1) They are written texts marked by careful use of language including techniques like metaphors, well-turned phrases, and meter.
2) They fall into established literary genres like poetry, prose, or drama.
3) They are intended by the author to be read aesthetically and contain intentional ambiguities open to interpretation.
Literary works are typically characterized by three things:
1) They are written texts marked by careful use of language including techniques like metaphors, well-turned phrases, and meter.
2) They fall into established literary genres like poetry, prose, or drama.
3) They are intended by the author to be read aesthetically and contain intentional ambiguities open to interpretation.
Literary works are typically characterized by three things:
1) They are written texts marked by careful use of language including techniques like metaphors, well-turned phrases, and meter.
2) They fall into established literary genres like poetry, prose, or drama.
3) They are intended by the author to be read aesthetically and contain intentional ambiguities open to interpretation.
Literary works are typically characterized by three things:
1) They are written texts marked by careful use of language including techniques like metaphors, well-turned phrases, and meter.
2) They fall into established literary genres like poetry, prose, or drama.
3) They are intended by the author to be read aesthetically and contain intentional ambiguities open to interpretation.
s are marked by careful use of language, including features such as creative metaphors, well-turned phrases, elegant syntax, rhyme, alliteration, meter s are in a literary genre (poetry, prose fiction, or drama) s are read aesthetically s are intended by the author to be read aesthetically s contain many weak implicatures (are deliberately somewhat open in interpretation) Written Texts, Marked by Careful Use of Language, in a Literary Genre The most basic characteristic of literature, it seems to me, is that a literary work is a verbal text. Further, a good example of a literary text will be written: although we can speak of oral literature, the fact that we need to use the qualifier ‘oral’ indicates that such texts are not the best examples—not the prototypes—of literature. That characteristic alone would include all kinds of texts which might be considered literature: cereal boxes, found poems, advertisements, shopping lists. And if some wish to call such texts literature, I have no objection; these characteristics, remember, are not a checklist which will keep some texts out of the category of literature. However, prototype theory suggests that there will be less agreement on calling these literature, and that those speakers of English who do so will express less confidence that everyone will agree with them. In fact, the second characteristic listed above is also quite important: that literary texts are marked by careful use of language, including features such as creative metaphors, well-turned phrases, elegant syntax, rhyme, alliteration, meter. This, it seems to me, is quite significant in establishing the meaning of the word ‘literature’: on the basis of this criterion, carefully-written personal essays are more likely to be considered literary than are, for example, encyclopedia articles. This characteristic may also provide some explanation for the use of the word ‘literature’ to mean the published research in a particular field: such literature, in addition to be written text, must also exhibit features of careful use of language according to particular standards. However, personal essays and researched articles do not meet the third characteristic: prototypical literary works are written in the literary genres of poetry, prose fiction, and drama. Note that I am not restricting the term ‘literature’ to these three genres; rather, I suggest that works in these three genres provide, to speakers of English, the best examples of the word ‘literature’. Works in other genres are often considered literature, but again terminology which is used to describe such works—terms like ‘literary non-fiction’—indicate that such texts are not prototypical literary works. Aesthetic Reading and the Author’s Intention In the example of the word ‘bird’, we noted that the prototypical bird—the birdiest bird—had features which were, from a criterial approach, not necessary to the definition. Thus, birds which fly and sing and are of a particular size, birds such as robins and canaries and sparrows, were consistently ranked as better examples of the category ‘bird’ than were birds which do not fly or sing, birds such as owls and penguins and ostriches. Flying, singing, and fitting into an average- size cage are not features of the criterial definition of ‘bird’; they are, however, characteristics of prototypical birds. For the term ‘literature’, I believe it is important to note that prototypical literary works cannot be identified solely on the basis of their written forms. We must also consider the way in which readers interact with them. I have used the term ‘aesthetic’ as proposed by Louise