Jomo Kenyatta University OF Agriculture and Technology
Jomo Kenyatta University OF Agriculture and Technology
Jomo Kenyatta University OF Agriculture and Technology
OF
AGRICULTURE AND
TECHNOLOGY
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
DAYS
CUBE CYLINDER
GRAPH1
A GRAPH OF LOAD AGAINST TIME GENERATED BY UTM DURING CRUSHING
OF CONCRETE.
GRAPH 2
F.DISCUSSION.
It was observed that the strength we obtained at 7 days was higher than the minimum strength
that is expected that is 20MPa.This proper strength can be attributed to proper hydration of the
cement 32.5 used in mix design process,reduction in voids by proper compaction while doing the
mix design proper curing of the concrete blocks.Values for the cylindrical specimen are observed
to be lower than the cubical specimens from our values it can be seen that the values for
compressive strength of cylindrical specimen is about 82% that of cubic specimens this is
slightly above the common theoretical percentage of 80%.
The density of concrete for the cube specimens were also found to within the acceptable range of
2300-2400kg/m3.Through consultation we were able to get a reasonable explanation for the low
values of the cylindrical specimen however we were not able to prove its validity.The low
compressive strength for cylinders is related to its long span(height) the long span cause unequal
distribution of loading hence cracking is experienced earlier compared to cube specimens which
due to their equal dimensions have equal distribution of loading hence cracking is experienced a
later stage. Cube specimens were observed to equally crack on the four faces however little
damage was done to the surface in contact with the plates of the UTM. This nature of fracture is
acceptable in the Compressive strength test, for the cylinders the cross-sectional area was also
observed to have fractures while little damage was done to the area where the load was applied
,however if the specimen was small enough to be able to fit in the UTM machine a conical
nature of fracture was to be expected without which the values for the test specimen could have
been disregarded. In general, large specimens have less variability and better representation of
the actual strength of the concrete than small specimens. Therefore, the 0.15-m by 0.30-m size is
the most suitable specimen size for determining the compressive strength. However, some
agencies use 0.10-m diameter by 0.20-m high specimens. The advantages of using smaller
specimens are the ease of handling, less possibility of accidental damage, less concrete needed,
the ability to use a low-capacity testing machine, and less space needed for curing and storage.
Because of the strength variability of small specimens, more specimens should be tested for
smaller specimens than are tested for standard-sized specimens. The following explanation can
be used to describe the reason of concrete failure The interface between the hardened cement
paste and aggregate particles is typically the weakest location within the concrete material. When
concrete is stressed beyond the elastic range, micro-cracks develop at the cement paste–
aggregate interface and continuously grow until failure.