SP38 - Steel Roof Trusses PDF
SP38 - Steel Roof Trusses PDF
SP38 - Steel Roof Trusses PDF
UDC : 624.072.336.3(021)
ISBN : 81-7061-021.4
PRICE : Rs 650.00
PKINI‘ED IN INDIA
Al- hUTAN PRINTEKS. I--89/12.
OKIHLA INDL. AKtA. I’! lASE 1.NEW l>I:l.l !I- 1 10020
AND PUBLISHED KY
WREAIJ OF INDIAN STANDAKDS. Nl .VI’111
_I I II 1 10002
SPECIAL COMMITTEE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROJECTS (SUP)
CHAIRMAN
DR H. C. VISVESVARAYA
National Council for Cement and Building Materials
New Delhi
MEMBERS REPRESENTING
DR M. RAMAIAH StrM”,‘d”,H”,’
Engineering Research Centre (CSIR),
CONVENER
DR H. C. VISVESVARAYA National Council for Cement and Building Materials,
New Delhi
MEMBERS REPRESENTING
SHRI HARISH CHANDRA Central Public Works Department, New Delhi
.. .
III
LICENSED TO LANCO INFRATECH LIMITED, UDUOG VIHAR, GURGAON,
FOR INTERNAL USE AT THIS LOCATION ONLY
As in the Original Standard, this Page is Intentionally Left Blank
0. FOREWORD
*Printed.
vi
In general use of 1 in 3 slope is recommended as this may not pose any
fabrication problem. Flatter slopes may be adopted after taking due
precautions for fabrication of trusses. In case of flatter slopes, the end laps
between adjacent sheets shall be correspondingly increased over that of 1 in 3
slope and/or the joints suitably sealed in accordance with the manufacturer’s
recommendations.
b) The analysis has been made using a computer programme based on the
stiffness method of analysis. The member properties required in the stiffness
analysis hqve been assumed on the basis of a preliminary design.
c) Trusses have been designed both as angle trusses and tubular trusses. The’
structure with steel roof trusses have been designed following the provisions of
IS : 800-1962 for hot-rolled sections and IS : 806-1968 for tubular sections.
There will be some variation in the permissible stress in case IS : 800-1984 is
used for design of hot-rolled sections. However, it is felt that the design results
presented in the Handbook will not be much different from those obtained by.
using IS : 800-1984.
d) The internal pressure/section specified in IS : 875-1964 for buildings with
normal permeability (kO.2) has been considered in design.
vii
Calcutta; Hindustan Prefab Limited, New Delhi; Planning Commission, New
Delhi; C. R. Narayana Rao, Architects and Engineers, Madras; Engineering
Construction Corporation Limited, Madras; Central Building Research Institute;
Roorkee; Jessop Company Limited, Calcutta; National Council for Cement and
Building Materials, New Delhi; Structural Engineering Research Centre, Madras;
Bureau of Public Enterprises, New Delhi; Central Public Works Department
(CDO), New Delhi; M. N. Dastur and Company Private Limited, Calcutta, Shri J.
Durai Raj, New Delhi; and their views have been taken into consideration while
finalizing the Handbook.
. ..
VIII
CONTENTS
Page
1. GENERAL
I. I Introduction 1
1.3 Terminology 2
2. ANALYSIS 6
2.1 Introduction 6
3. DESIGN 6
6
5. DESIGN EXAMPLE 28
5.10 Drawings 54
ix
SP : 38(,5&T)-1987
(bl N-TYPE
980. I 9.1
24.00 M
d (b) N-TYPE
*5o*o 7.8
The joint numbers are shown in the right half Columns - These are members, generally
of the trusses and the member numbers within vertical, which primarily resist axial load. They
circles in the left half of the trusses in Fig. 2A. are more often subjected to thrust and moment.
The joint and member numbers in the other Usually rolled single sections are used but laced
halves are symmetrical. Analysis and design and battened columns are also used where two or
details are presented with respect to the joint and more rolled sections are connected together by
niember numbers. lacing or batten plates.
1.2.2 Lean-to Roof Truss Configuration - Column Height -- It is the height of column from
Figure 2B shows the configuration of the typified the top of column pedestal (or bottom of column
lean-to roof trusses for different span lengths base plate) to the bottom of truss shoe angle in
alongwith tie runner positions. These the structures without cranes and up to bottom of
configurations have been arrived at after a gantry girder in case of columns with cranes.
detailed study of various possible configurations.
Crane Girders - These resist vertical and
The distance between nodes in the rafters are horizontal loads from cranes. They usually consist
restricted to be less than or equal to 1.4 m so that of a l-beam with a channel, flanges down, welded
the purlins may be located directly at the nodes to the top flange.
and thus avoid panel bending of rafters.
Girts - Beam members carrying side sheeting and
The member numbers are shown within circles supported by columns.
adjacent to members and joint numbers adjacent
to nodes in Fig. 2B. These joint and member Purlins - Beam members carrying roof sheeting
numbers are used to present all the analysis and and supported by trusses.
design details. Roof Slope - It is the slope of the roof material
1.3 Terminology with respect to the span length. It is obtained by
dividing height of truss by half the span of truss
Bay-The space between succesgive bents is for A-type truss and height of truss divided by
called a bay. span for lean-to roof truss.
Bracing- The single or double diagonal Spacing Between Trusses - The centre line
membeh which form trusses with columns or distance of two trusses in longitudinal direction.
beams (trusses) to provide stability and resist
horizontal load. Span -The centre line distance of roof columns
in transverse direction.
2
SP : 38(S&cT)_1987
MEMBER NOS.
----I-- JOINT NOS.
TIE RUNNERSL
(a) SPAN = 9.0m
I
MEMBER NOS JOINT NOS.
-I--- -
LTIE RUNNER
(d) SPAN=24.0m
LTIE RUNNER
(e) SPAN=30.0 m
4
SP:38(S&T)-1987
TIE RUNNERSJ
(a) SPAN: 9.0m
5
SP : 38(s&T)-1987
Truws - These are framed assemblies generally due to the minimum basic wind pressure of 100
carrying loads in the plane of the frame. The kg/m?. Hence the earthquake loads does not
individual members are primarily in te?sion or govern the design of structures with steel roof
compression which may be accompanied with trusses.
some bending moment.
2.2 A-Type Roof Truss Analysis Results -~ I’hc
2. ANALYSIS analysis results for all the A-type trusses are given
in Tables 1 to 90. The heading of each table gives
2.1 lntrodtiction - The steel trusses have been the design parameters of the truss. The maximum
analyzed as simply supported on columns. The compressive force, the mement due to the
rafter and tie members of the trusses have been corresponding load case and maxlmum -tens&
adequately braced raterally thus preventing out- force and the moment due to the corresponding
of-plane buckling. 7 he trusses have been analyzed load case for each member are tabulated. The
assuming the connections between the members to forces tabulated are the values after 25 percent
be rigid and capable of transferring moment and reduction in the analysis result. if wind load has
shear in addition to axial force. The support at contributed to the force in the member. (This
one end is assumed to be hinged and the other 1
end on rollers for the purpose of analysis. This is reduction accounts for the 33 - percent increase
3
achieved in the actual structure by the flexibility in the tillowable stress in such loading cases). The
of columns.
wind load in order to determine the governing buildings with normal permcabi!ity. HoweLet
design forces. The member design forces for all sheeting and ahccting fasteners have to be
the trusses to be typified and their support designed for incrcabcd wind prescurc due to loc;~I
reactions have been given in this Handbook. effects as per IS : 875-1964. I IIC dcsipn has been
presented for tubular purlins ;111d girts without
A few typical >hort and long span structures any sag rod, and for channel purlm~ and girts
with roof trusses were analysed for earthquake without sag rod and altcrnati\el!~ with one sag rod
forces according to IS : I X93-1975 and the at mid span. The diagonal sag rods arc assumed
member forces cvcn due to the severest to be provided at the top most panel and also at
earthquake was always found to be less than that every 8th panel for purlins and 7th panel for girts.
6
SP : 38(S&T~l!M7
The staridard connection details of purlins and been designed both as angfe trusses and tubular
girts to the framing is shown in Fig. 3. The sag trusses. A computer programme which could
rod and diagonal sag rod details used in channel directly process all the analysis programme results
purlins and girts and given in Fig. 4. and design the truss members using angle and
\(Jrl. tubular sections was developed for the purpose.
Inrtcad of simply supported purlin and girt
dcsien Eikc’tt i!i thib tv&ied debirn. halanctxl cantilever All the shop connections have been assumed to be
welded and the field connections to bc bolted or
welded. for the design.
The effective length of compression members
has been assumed to be 0.85 times the actual
length of the members ccntre to centrc of nodes.
3.3 Truss Design - The A-tspc trusses habc The masimum slenderness ratio of compression
been designed for the forces g&n in Tables I to mcmbcrs has been restricted to be less than IX0
90 and lean-to roof trusses for the forces $en in and tension members-to be_ less than 250. I-‘01
Tables 91 to 144 using angle and tube hcctiona. ;tnglcs in tt’nL.i0n. the net effective area as pet-
The members of steel roof truhses have .ce I1 IS : 800-1962 has been considere.d in design. ‘I‘hc
designed for the simultaneous actIon of axial compression members ha\;c been designed against
lorces and bending momenrs, obtained from the buckling in and out ol the truss. In order to
analysis programme, following the go\,erning reduce the inventory of too many diffcrcn!
protlsions of IS : 800-1962. rh.: trusses have sectIons. on!! thirteen diflercnt angle sections anJ
7
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
G. I. FLAT WASHER-
G.I*NUT
.I. CRANK BOLT
(a)CHANNEL PURLI NS
SECTION A - A
G.I. FLAT WASHER7
G-I. NUT--- \4 I
GiHOOK BOLT - \\\“’ //
BITUMEN WASHER
TUBE PURLINS.
RAFTER -/
PURLI
SECTION B-B
ENTRE OF PURLIN
SECTION X-X SPAN
DETAIL- A DETAIL-B
(WITH 20mm STRUT)
” !
DETAIL C
tl I
ALT. DETAIL 8
(WITH ISA 50X50X6)
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
lourteen different tubular sections have been used tne weight of gussets and other accessories. is also
in the final design. These sections have been presented in Tables 145 to 192. The weight of
choosen on the basis of most frequent occurrence each truss per square metre of the plan area
in the least weight design. In case any .section covered, is given in at the bottom of each table.
specified in Handbook is not available in market, The gusset design for a few typical angle trusses
the same can be substituted with next heavier indicates that the weight of gusset would be in the
section available. range of 20-30 percent of weight of the truss, the
larger percentage being applicabIe for smaller
Minimum section specified for internal web spans.
members in trusses with angle sections is equal
angle ISA 40 X 40 :< 6. However for larger A- The tie runners have been designed as te_&pn
type trusses with spans of 24 m and, 30 m, this members giving lateral restraint to the bottom
chord under wind uplift. Since the forces in these
minimum angle may be replaced by angle ISA 50 X
50 X 6, wherever there IS any chance of dlstortlon members are very nominal, their sizes as given
or deformation taking place during transportation below are determined by the maximum allowable
or erection of truss. slenderness ratio of 350. The eaves beams have
been designed to have a slenderness ratio not to
The rafter members, tie members and the exceed 250. These also should be checked for
!ongest leading diagonal member of all trusses compression due to bracing forces.
The tic member!, .rf the trusses have been 3.4.1 The columns of the atcci rool tiu\sch
designed for compression due to wind uplift h:t~c hccn dcsigncd air cantiicvcr CO~LII~I~~. tile
considering the tie members to be laterally braced cantlicwr columns in structures without cranes
against buckling at tie runner locations as.shown h:tvc been designed 10 slIpport the load5 coming
in Fig. 1 and 2. The tie members have also been irom the truhscs in addition to the dead load and
checked for laterai buckling while lifting the Mind forces from side ctaddings. 25 per-cent
trushcs for erection reduction of wind load allowed in IS : X75-1964
ioi building height:, less than 30 metrcs has been
.l’he steel A-type truss design results are considct-cd for column design. l‘hc colum~ts hahc
presented in Tables 145 to 159 fc.r angle trusses been designed as beam columns. having thcil 1
and Tables 160 to 174 for tubular trusses. The m 3.j0 r axis perpendicular to the ~pallning
steel lean-to roof truss design results are presented direction of the trusses. I’he effcctivc Icngth of the
in Tables 17.5 to i 83 for angle trusses and in cantiievcr columns for axial load ih taken to bc
Tables 184 to 192 for tubular trusses. Each tablb I.5 tinles the actual length for huchiing about the
covers all the trusses having the same span and maior axis and 0.75 times the actual icngth tor
roof slope but two different spacings between buckling about the minor axis. ‘I hc effective
trusses (4.5 and 6.0 mj and three different wind length for lateral buckling in flcxurc 01’ the
zones. cantiicvcr columns is taken to be quaI to 0.75
times the actual length. In the multihay structures,
A reference to Table I of IS : I t 61-1979 t!lc columns have been chcckcd cousidcring the
indicates that for some of diameters (for example wind drag on the interior roof ;I\ per IS : X75-
50 and 150 mm dia) tubes of more than one 1964. The columns arc ~~ssumcd to be I~\,cd at
weight are available. In such cases tubes of base and tied together by trusses :tt the top. thus
minimum weights have only been used for the forcing the cantilever deflection ol all the columns
purpose of this Handbook. ,ioined together by trusses in a iinc to be equal.
Altogether, ninety different designs for A-type 3.4.2 .Thc design results arc presented in
trusses and fifty four different designs for lean-to Tab!es 193 to 202 for the A-type roof truss
roof trusses have been given for trusses made up columns and in Tables 203 to 20X for the lean-to
of angles or tubes the number of different roof trubs columns. Each table gives the details
typified trusses may be further reduced for the for a column. supporting the truss having a given
purpose of mass production by choosing the most span length and spacing between trusses. l‘he
critical design for all the wind zones and spacings, dctaiis given are reactions at the bottom of the
if so desired. This however may mean an Increase column. and the minimum section required from
in the weight of trusses by as much as about 40 each of the four different types 01 roiicd I-sections
percent. The total weight of each truss, excluding namely iSI.R, ISMB. ISWB and ISlIH. All the
SP : 38(S&T)_1987
column sections listed in SP : 6(l)-1964 support. Mimmum side clearance from face ’ 6f.
have been considered in the design. If any roof leg to the centre line of rail has been kept as
particular section is not available,’ the next bigger 500 mm and minimum top clearance of 3.0 m has
section may be used in fabrication. Since the been provided in accordance with IS : 8640-1977.
columns are acting more as flex-Ural members The design sections are given only for the
than as compression members, the slenderness commonly, available ISMC and ISMB sections.
ratio limit has been taken’as 250 rather than 180 Tables 210 and 2 11 give the analysis and design
in the design of columns. The horizontal results for different spans of gantry girders.
deflection of the columns (sway) at the top has 3.5.3 Analysis and Design of Stepped
been restricted to be less than height/325. The Columns - in case of structures with cranes,. the
bending moments in interior columns of multi- cantilever columns have been designed to resist
bay structures is less than that of the crane loads in addition to dead, live and wind
corresponding single-bay column arti hence the loads. The columns have been designed to restrict
column sizes given in Tables 193 to 208 may be the maximum transverse deflection cf the
used also for interior columns of multiple bay columns to be-less than ‘height/ 325’ at the top. At
structure. the crane level the lateral deflection due to
3.4.3 Forces for the design of foundations of combined transverse crane surge and service load
11
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
The slope of truss system has not been the truss shall be connected to cleat angle with 2-
considered as a variable because there is no 12 mm diameter bolts at each end.
significant variation in the design forces of
columns due to variation in roof slope. All the The straight sag rod and diagonal sag rod
analysis and design results for columns have been details are shown in Fig. 4 for the roof purlins
carried out for only signle bay system. and wail girts respectively. In wide roofs having
large number of purlins and in high wall claddings
In the design o‘f columns, the 25 percent
having large number of girts, the diagonal sag
reduction of wind load as allowed in IS : 875-1964 rods should be provided at every 8th Panel for
for building height less than 30 metres, has been purlin and 7th Panel for girt. The top most panel
considered. The typified design results are close to the ridge in the roof, and the top-most
presented in Tables 212 and 213. panel close to the eaves in the wall should have
3.5.4 Foundation Forces - Founctation forces diagonal sag rods and in addition should sup-
due to dead load, live load, crane load and wind port, by a strut, the top purlin or girt as shown
load have been presented separately to facilitate in Fig. 4.
the use of working siress or limit state design as
desired by the engineer. For the base moments 4.2 Angle Truss Connection Details - The
typical details of connections between angle truss
12
SP : 38(SBiTW87
SLOTTED HOLE AT
ONE Em) AND
CIRCULARHOLE AT
2F COLUMN RI
‘“’ ‘ii;; 6%&i&R SECTION A-A
HAVWG CIRCULAR HOLE
TO BE WELDED AFTER ERECTION
ISA SOXSOX6
;
h-- \ /RAN6 RAIL
DE1-t
. i < 2-l6MC 200
-CRANE COLUMN-C!
\ /f-ISMC 200
.ATE
SLOTTEd HOLE AT
ONE END AND
ROOF COLUMN-R 2 SECTION C-C CIRCULAR HOLE AT
40cm THE OTHER END
ISM6 30%
13
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
iSMC 1006
---CRANE RAIL
GANTRY GIRDER
UNWELDED LENGTH
FIELD WELD SYMBOL
CONNECTIN‘G REFERENCE
LINE TO ARROW SIDE OF JOINT, TO
EDGE PREPARED MEMBER OR BOTH
FILLET
II
SQUARE BUTT
DOUBLE V BUTT - 8
w
SINGLE U BUTT
DOUBLE U BUTT 8
14
SP : 38(S&T~lWI’I
SECTION Y Y
FIG. 8 DETAIL RI
47 -WEI MEHOER
FIG. 9 DETAIL R2
FIG. IO DETAIL R3
FIG. 13 DETAIL R5
15
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
FIG. 14 DETAIL Tl
FIG. 17 DETAIL R6
WEBMEMBER8
16
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
WEBMEMBER
NOTE .
I. iefer Table 222 for spacing d of tack welds
2. Use 60 mm wide spacer plates of adequate length
TIE MEMBER corresponding to angle size.
3. The thickness of the spacer plate is equal to the
thickness of gusset.
FIG. 22 DETAIL T2f AT FIELD SPLICE
(30m span only) FIG. 25 TACK WELD DETAIL.
17
LICENSED TO LANCO INFRATECH LIMITED, UDUOG VIHAR, GURGAON,
FOR INTERNAL USE AT THIS LOCATION ONLY
SP : 38(S&T)1987
AN0
TRW9
TIE MEMBER
c
a
TIL MCYIER
TIE MEMbER
FIG. 34 DETAIL T2
Mm LUN-TO ROOF TM
ALL txccn Sl2m TWBbCs
19
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
FIG. 40 DETAI!. R7 FOR LEAN- 1.0 ROOF TRUSS 4.6 Truss Camber -The truss deflections are
well below span length/325. If however initial
camber is desired for tie members, appropriate
camber may be provided.
4.7 Miscellaneous Details - Various bracing
20
FOR INTERNAL USE AT THIS LOCATION ONLY
LICENSED TO LANCO INFRATECH LIMITED, UDUOG VIHAR, GURGAON,
1.
SHOE I
ANGLE
4 NOS
TOP RA;;S\ _
MEMBER
YP.
FOR SIZE OF SHOE ANGLE 6
CAP PLATE REFER TABLE -226
TOP RAFTERS-...
ER
B. Tubular Trusses
22
SP : 38(54&T)-1987
2!5mm
KEY DETAIL
NOTE :
1.SEE TABLE 2 28 FOR
COLUMN BASEA BOLT SIZES.
I- -i
23
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
lSMC Section
ISMB action
PLAN AT-X X
StCTION E LE.VATION
24
SP : 38(s#p1987
I 6SO
1
- ISA 50X50X6
----__
KEY
-T:--
DETAIL
kl
lhm THICK
KEY BELOW II w
BASE PLATE II
A-___
----
NOTES:
I. REFER TABLE 230
FOR SLAB BASE
SIZE &BOLTS DFTAILS
25
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
bracing should be provided between the rafter Typified designs of foundation is not included
level and tie level in these bays to transfer roof in this Handbook, have to be erected taking into
drag force to tie level bracing. In addition to tie varies from site to site would influence the design
‘eve1 bracing designed to transfer lateral loads, of foundation.
Sracing across the buildings in the end bays is
frequently provided at the rafter level also to The foundations supporting the columns may
ensure the stabilit:l of the structure during be designed as spread footing, pile foundation or
erection. caisson foundation depending upon the soil
condition at site. Since the columns are assumed
The vertical bracing in the longitudinal walls is to be fixed at base, the foundations should be
shown in Fig. 47 in a central bay. This is being capable of resisting the moment from the column
suggested to avoid temperature stresses, that may without undergoing objectionable rotation. An
occur. However in this bracing system having example of spread foundation design is given
vertical bracing in the central bay, temporary in 5.7.
bracing &nay be necessary at the end bay also
during erection for purpose of stability. The genera1 details of supporting A.C. gutters
are presented in Fig. 48.
Vertical bracing is usually provided at gable in this Handbook since the soil conditions which
AY USE X TYPE
NNE --- Tie level bracing may be used in addition to rafter level bracing.
FIG. 47 BRACINGSARRANGEMENTS
26
SP:38(S&Tb1987
A.C. SHEET-
/
M.S. FLAT/BAR GUTTER CLAMP
_OCKET OF GUTTER
M.S. FLAT/BAR GUTTER CLAMP
w ‘“ALF ROUND GUTTER
27
SP : 38pdk~)-1987
of IS : 800-1984 regarding fabrication and Height of column = 9.0 m
erection shall be followed. Type of roofing = A.C. Sheeting
Location of shed = Delhi
The following points should be taken care of Type of truss = A-type
during erection:
Truss Configuration and Choice of Loading
Stability - A roof truss when first placed in
position on its end supports may be unstable. The configuration for roof truss span 12 m is
Lifting attachments should not be released until given in Fig. 2A.
the truss has been positively attached to provide
restraint against overturning. It should be noted Basic wind pressure = 150 kg/m’
that normal purlin connections provide only a Spacing of trusses = 6.0 m
limited resistance to lateral movement. No Roof slope = 1 in 3
reliance should be placed on connections made to
other parts of the structure unless the connection
can develop its full load carrying capacity, for
example connections made to brickwork or
concrete should be secure and resistance to
displacement or withdrawal from new brickwork
or concrete should be developed to an adequate
Bearings -- When a truss is placed on earings The roof slope of 1 in 3 and spacing of 6.0 m
which are designed to provide freedom of
give the minimum weight of truss as observed
movement, temporary restraints should be from Tables 148 to 150. Other roof slopes and
provided. Any temporary fastening of the spacings can be choosen, if so desired.
bearings or of the truss should be removed as
soon as its permanent stability has been ensured. Therefore basic parameters for the analysis are:
Care shold be taken that any thrust imposed on Span = 12.0 m
the bearings by a truss when it is being landed in
position does not create a displacement Spacing = 6.0
sufficiently great as to cause hazard. Any Roof slope = 1 in 3
displacement caused during the erection of a truss
should be rectified before the lifting equipment is Basic wind pressure = 150 kg/m’
released.
Weight of roofing = 17 kg/m’
For laying of asbestos cement sheets, materials (including extra
recommendations of 1S : 3007 (Part I)-1964 ‘Code weight due to overlaps
of practice for laying of asbestos cement sheets: and fasteners)
Part I Corrugates sheets’ shall be followed.
Governing wind pressure = (0.6 + 0.2) X 150
5. DESIGN EXAMPLE for design with = 120 kg/m*
normal permeability
Plan area = 12.0 m X 42.0 m
Roof truss span = 12.0 m Miscellaneous loads = 3.5 kg/ m2
28
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
29
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
FS = F4 = 11.071 w
= 14.23 W (compression)
(compression) = 1.803 W
= W (compression) (compression)
Joint 2
FII = W (compression)
Joint 4 W 12’125W
Fe cos 18.43 + F,A = - 1.803 W
X cos 33.69” 1
cos 33.69”
+ 14.23 W @
cos 18.43” F7
= 12 w . . .(i) 1 FII
F6 sin 18.43“ - F,t = 14.23 W
sin 33.69” sin 18.43 Joint 6
- 1.803 W FM cos 9.46O = 12.125 W cos 18.43
X sin 33.69” - W - 11.071 W cos 18.43
= 2.498 6 W
. . .(ii) I;;4 = 1.013 W (Tension)
30
SF’ : 38(SBT)_1987
W
5’206 W
SPAN = I2.Om
NOTE - NUhBER WITHIN THE CIRCLE INDICATE THE JOINT AND NUMBER WlT++OUT
THE CIRCLE INDICATE THE MEMBER.
Joint I
FI = l/2 H (Tension)
H f9
F4 0
Joint 2
F4 F15 sin 33.69O = 0,333 H
Joint 3 0.333H
F5 cos 18.43O = 1.0 H
Therefore F5 = 1. 54 If (Tension)
F9 P
= 1.054 H sin 18.43
= 0.333. H (Tension)
31
Sp : 38(S&T)-1987
Joint 4
3.52H
F6 cos 18.43” + F,3 cos 33.69O = 1.054 H cos
18.43O + H - 0.6 H cos 33.69 = 1.50 H
. .(i)
l.os&F,, Joint
FM
6
Joint 5
F16 sm 39.81 = 0.6 H sin 33.69” + 0.503 H
Fl6 = 1.305 H (compression)
\&-’ For Dead load + Live load combination
W = 290 + 280 = 570 kg
Let us consider a part of the truss as in
figure. H = 0
32
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
DESIGN FORCES
Member CotTfficient for Force in the Member for
Number A
r-\ ’ DL+LL DL+ WL ’
H W W=570 kg W = (-) 430 kg
H=O kg H=216 kg
Comupter analysis results for all the members Considering the unsymmetrical bending of the
of the truss are given in Table 29. The computer channel section
results presented in this table have both axial
forces and bending moment whereas the manual M,, = 123.18 ’ ‘OS r.435ox 6 ’ 6 = 525.9 kgm
analysis presented above gives only the axial
forces. It can be seen that the axial forces given in
the table above from manual calculations Considering the sag rod at mid span
compare well with computer analysis results M = 123.18 X sin 18.435O X 3 X 3
presented in Table 29. YY = 43.8 kgm
8
5.1 Purlin Design -- Purhn is designed with one Checking the section TsMC 125
sag rod at mid-span.
Maximum spacing of fbc = -52 590 + -4 380
ourlin = 1.4 m 56.6 13.1
1
4
= 81.38 kg/m
DL+ LL = 123.18 kg/m
Wind load uplift force = 0.8 X 150 X 1.4
= 16g kg/m
Net uplift force = 168 - 41.8 X cos 18.435” h
= 128.3 kg/m
3
33
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
128.3 X 36
M xx = - 577.4 kgm
8
41.8 X sin 18.435 X 9
M = = 14.9 kgm
Yy 8
F = 57 740 +-- I 490
bc
66.6 :3.i
= 981 < 1.33 X 1 650 kg/cm’
Therefore O.K.
Size of sag rod
Assume the size = ISRO 12 mm dia
3m 3m
Number of purlins = 6 I
34
SP : 38(S&T)=1#7
35
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
100.99
ANGLE
40X40X6 F, = Permissible stress in compression =
910 _
910 - 813
10
1= 900 kg/m2
++ $<l
a
F, = 5 567.118.74 = 636.96 kg/cm2
fb= 3 322.1/18.1 = 183.54 kg/cm’
Under tension forces Fb = 1 655 kg/cm2
Area
leg of outstanding =
1 b
‘;‘i”,,O.~) 0.6 Therefore = -636.96 + -183.54
9oo 1 655
36
SP : 38(S&Tb19%7
= 3 240 kg
37
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
= 12 611.25 kgm
Moment at base of CD = 472.5 X 9
X:+68X9-490X9
0.3Pd; 1 I =0.7Pd
= 15 338.25 kgm
Considering the increase in allowable stress for
PcJ=-75X150X6 wind load combination forces, the reduced forces
= 675 Kg/m are:
38
SP : 38(SBiT)-19%7
X 1
= 1 658.4 kg/cm*
X
369.8 X 48.28*
+ 0.162 82.5.X 675* 1
4110wable bending stress = 780.94 kg/cm*
Check for simultaneous action of bending and
axial tension and moment:
From Table 196, column section = ISMB 500/86.9
785.0 1 151 000
Try 2-ISA 110 110x 15
110.74 x 1 500 + 1 650 X 1 808.7
x=2 tan 6O”X4.5+2=17.58 cm t= 1.5 cm
= 0.39 < 1.0 Therefore O.K.
Moment in angle = 721 X 4.5 = 3 244.5 kgcm
Check for compressive stress due to bending,
3 244.5X6
k===Il -3-65
4 i+l .+
-
490
Wind load shear per bolt =fi = 4 ‘Y’ t
[see 5.3(c)]
= 122.5
Try 4-20 black bolts
39
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
I-+
--- 800 ..__----_j
Taking the moments about the anchor bolts elements, they can be designed by following the
= J 18 50
170X9X6
X 1 890 = 3.22 cm < 3.6 cm
2
;
R5
Wl
Rl
T3
R5
WI
Rl
T3
9
Therefore provided base plate is adequate. 10 R6 R6
Bearing stress as the base key Gusset thickness from Table 221 = 10 mm
2 873 Fastener details are presented in Tables 222 and
= - = 11.5 kg/cm’< 0.25 fCk
50 X 5 225 for angles and Tubular Trusses, respectively.
c2 I-L, “~.-....I.%*- tiuss
I 11L L”‘llp‘GLG .~ith Kkembei and
Bending in plate = 11.5 X -$ = 144 kgcm connection detail is shown in the drawing
enclosed.
Bending stress in 10 mm plate = 144 X 6/ 1
= 864 < 1 890 kg/cm2 5.7 Desip of Foundation ~-- Typified ?es_igns of
foundation is not included in this report since the
Therefore O.K. soil condition which varies from site to site would
influence the design of foundation. A typical
Use 5 mm fillet weld to connect the key.
example of isolated footing design for assumed
Due to standardization sizes ‘of column cap field condition is illustrated in this section.
plate, shoe angle and base plate are conservative IS : 456-1978 limit state design procedure is used
in this example. If one desires less conservative in this example.
40
SP : 38(S&T)_1987
1351.5x39
Development length required =
10 x 1.0 x 4
= 1 318 mm
= 131.8 cm
Use 135 cm embedment in concrete.
P=l.33X4043=6 191 kg
For Fe 415 and ; = 0.05
T= 1.33 X 785 = 1 047 kg
V=1.33X2873=3831 kg I- = 0.03
fck
M= 1.33 X 11 510 = 15 346 kgm
P = 0.03 X 15 = 0.45
Development Length of Anchor Bolts
Provide minimum reinforcement = 0.8 percent,
From the design of base plate (see 5.5)
Therefore area of longitudinal steel =
Total tension in 3 bolts = 18 170 kg
(due to wi’d, after $ X 570 X 870 = 3 967 mm2
reduction P5 percent)
41
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
42
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
=
1,,,,)+
+ (17 352 - 5 324)
rxx required = g = 2.0
1
x 0.91 x2x 0.91
- x1.5 Tie runners
2 3
Tie runners are designed nominally on the basis
= 8 286 kg m/m width of l/r ratio.
= 81.25 kN.m/m width Length of tie runners = 6.0 m
Maximum factored B.M. at Section B Maximum l/ r = 350
4 250X0.912 = g= 1.71 cm
rmin
= 1 5x = 2 640 kgm/m
2
Try IS.4 9090 X 6
= 25.9 kN.m/m = 1.75 cm
rmin
43
SP:38(S&Tb1987
II‘-lSMB
4ASE
500
PLATE 800X 500X36
---
3-39mm p-
o BOLTS
ii!
.L
LEAN CONRETE J
12# @
200 c/c
-.
A
0
0
P
(u
FOOTING DETAILS
44
SP : 38(S&Tb1987
l- I
SIDE ELEVATION
i>
TYPICAL DEtAlLS OF BRACINGS
NOTE:- RAFTER BRACING NOT SHOWN
45
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
The tie runner size (if they are part of tie level Assuming the roof drag force to be equally
bracing system) may have to be modified on the shared by the two end bay bracings.
basis of bracing design. Drag force at lines (2), (4)
Design of bracings for wind perpendicular to
Gable End = 36 ; 4*8 x 166 = 691 kg
Wind columns
Vertical cross bracings are provided between
Height = 9 m. the rafter and tie in the end bays to transfer these
forces to tie level along the grid lines (2) and (4) in
3.6 X 4.8 the end bay.
Wind force per = 0.7x 150x 2
column Length of cross bracings = Jm=3.23m
where
X 1 +0.162X Kr’
I;hT l-0
b
46
5P :38(S&T~1!387
Windward side bracing% Wind drag from side walls= 0x.072:z I50 X 4.5
Wind force at Nodes (2), (4): = 709 kg
Drag on roof = $97 kg Total compression on = 5 209 kg
Force on gable ends (areas ‘b? eaves beam
47
SP : 38(S&Tk1987
=&P+ a]
=$$(Y)] =0.35 t
48
SP : 386&T)-19117
I, = 45 218.3 + 110.74 (31.06 - 25)’ Therefore combined bending stress = 748 + 164
+219.1 + 38.67(19.65 - 2.3)’
= 61 144.7 cm4; = 912 kg/cm=< 1.1 X 1547 kg/cm’
zy = 3 816.8 + 1 369.8 = 5 186.6 cm4 Therefore section is O.K. for stresses.
Zy of compression flange
20 450
Bearing stress at the function =
= 3 816.8 + y = 4 501.7 cm4 of gantry web and flange 1,@+2xJ3j;;)
5 186.6
ry = = 5.89 cm where
110.74 + 38.67
tw = thickness of web,
b = width of load contact or bearing plate
(Z/rJ = $J = 101.9
h2 = distance between edge of flange and
c, = 4 359 kg/cm* ;ooA of flange as given in SP : 6(l)-
Fb = 1 547 kg/cm*
49
SP :38(S&T)-1987
)I
w’here --- 150 3
= 0.52cm
R= vertical shear at support, ( 600
tw = web thickness, and Total Gantry weight = 118 + 50 = 168 kg/m
B = the length of stiff portion of bearing + (assuming crane rail weight = 50 kg/m)
half depth of beam + thickness of
flange plate (if any) Deflection due to self weight = $4
= 20 450
(7.5 + 25.0) 1.02 1.68 X 6004
X
= 616.9 kg/cm* 2.047X lo6 X 61 144.7
= 0.002 3 cm
50
SP : 38(S&T)4987
(l/ryyj =-2.-L
2.84
I = 132.04
J
l + 0.162 X 24.33 X 3752
453.9 X 28.762 Design : .
= 3 086 kg/cm2 Length = 6.0 m
375 Effective length xx = 0.85 X 600 = 510 cm
11rYY = z= 132.04
Effective length yy = spacing = 80 cm
Allowable compressive stress in bending of Lacing
= 1 276 kg/cm* 510
Check for bending and axial compression: 0 x==9.94 = 51.3
51
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
Total = 5006 kg
M/I DIAGRAM
x375x0.75x3751 l
2.047 X lo6
I
= 2.7 cm < -325 = 3.0 cm
Therefore O.K.
hJ
Determination of deflection at crane level for a
basic service wind pressure of 25 kg/cm2 and
crane
surge
load:
Deflection at crane level = Bending
of moment at Y
column.
conjugate
‘l-he deflections are calculated using conjugate Shaded area = $ X 2.98 X 975 - i X 0.44 X 375
oeam method.
+ 6.44 4.12
Determination of the deflection at to of 3x375-3x300
column due to full wind load on wall clad d!mgs:
Wind load = 0.7 X 0.75 X 150 X 6 = 472.5 kg/m = 968.5 - 55 + 805 - 412
52
SP : 38(SBrT)-1987
t
6.Om _i_ 3.75m _
l-
LOADING DIAGRAM
8. M. DIAGRAM
2.85 4.62
DIAGRAM
CONJUGATE CQLUMN
Deflection at crane level due to point load = Maximum shear in the column = 0.7 X 0.75
x 150 X 6 X 9.75
= 0.31 X 600 X 375 + 2.54 X y = 4607 kg
1
Keep spacing of lacing = 80 cm
1
X~!75+462X~X50 tan 8 = &= 0.497 51
2 2.047 X 10’
=0.21 cm :. 8 = 26.451’
Maximum lacing force
Total deflection at crane level = 0.21 + 0.21
=(.025X26464+4607)
= 0.42 cm
2
< Z/ 1 000 = 0.6 cm
Therefore O.K. xdT= 2 942 kg
53
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
1 Try 2 ISlvlC
together by ISA
rmm
100 at 85
5050 X 6
= 4.0
mm apart laced
Therefore O.K.
1 80.4 ~
The vertical bracings belovv tie beam should be
designed as earlier considering crane surge in the
longitudinal direction also.
End ties
5.10 Drawings -- It must be realised that for
26 464 X 0.025 + 4 607 design of structure to be valid, the assumptions
Bending in end ties = made in design office should be realised in the
2
field. This is all the more important in ensuring
that the connections envisaged are actually
X y = 105 372 kg. cm fabricated. Therefore, extreme care is necessary
while preparing the drawings which is the only
105 372 source of communication between the designer
7-rcqd= - = 63.9 cm3 and the executive staff. A set of 5 drawings have
1 650
been prepared for the design example given earlier
Use ISMC 200 and is appended at the end of handbook. It may
be understood that the details given in these
fabrication drawings are only typical details and
several alternatives may be feasible depending
I SMC 250 upon the common practice followed in different
ISMC 20 consulting engineering organizations.
54
SY : %(S&Tbl987
Typical connection details for purlins, trttsses The smaller values for the above ratio are for
and columns have been presented. Finally an steeper slopes of roof.
example illustrating the use of the handbook has
2) Generally tubular structural system consume
been presented.
less weight per unit area compared to angle
Comparison of steel weight in the roofing is truss systems. The ratio of unit weight of tube
given in Tables 231 to 242 for A-type and lean-to to angle system is in the range of 0.61 to 0.81,
roof truss systems. The weights given in these the ratio being generally larger for flatter
tables include weight of all the members such as slopes and 6.0 m spacing of trusses.
purlins, sag rods, truss weight, gussets (on the
3) Spans in the range of 12 to 18 m in the A-
basis of approximate percentage of the truss
type truss system and 9 m in lean-to roof
weight), and tie runners but excludes the weight truss svstem generally require less material
of columns, bracing, etc. From these tables the per unit area compared to other spans.
following conclusions may be drawn:
4) Purlins weight constitute between 39 and 81
1) The ratio of weight per square metre of 6.0 m percent of the total weight of the tubular truss
spacing to 4.5 m spacing of trusses is systems and between 29 and 66 percent of the
generally in the range of 1.04 to 1.2 for angle angle truss system.
55
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
1. IS : 226-1975 Specification for structural steel 9. 1S : 807-1976 Code of practice for design,
(standard quality) (fiyfh revision) manufacture, erection and testing (structural
portion) of cranes and hoists first revision)
2. IS : 2002-1984 Specification for weldable
structural steel (t/ri;d revision) 10. IS : 8640-1977 Recommendations for
dimensional parameters for industrial
3. IS : 11.61-1979 Specification for steel tubes buildings
for structural purposes (third revision)
4. IS : 875-1964 Code of practice for structural 11. IS : 3007 (Part Q-1964 Code of practice for
safety of buildings: Loading standards laying of asbestos cement sheets: Part I
(revised) Corrugated sheets
5. IS : 1893-1975 Criteria for earthquake 12. Arya (AS) and Ajmani (JL), Design of St/eel
resistant design of structures structures (Table 13-8), Third Edition, Nem
Chand and Bros, 1977.
6. 1S : 800-1962 Code of practice for use of
57
SP : 38 (S&T)-1987
58
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
59
SP:38(S&T)-1987
60
SP : 38(s&T)-1987
cm kg kg.cm kg kg.cm
61
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
62
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
64
SP : 38(s&T)-19sI
cm kg kgcm kg kg.cm
cm kg kg.cm kg kg.cm
66
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
cm kg kgsm kg kg.cm
67
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
68
SP : 38(S&T)r1987
69
SP:38(S&T)-1987
70
SP :38(9&T)-1987
cm kg kg.cm kg kg.cm
71
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
72
SP : 3S(S&T)-1987
73
SP:38(S&T)-1987
74
SP :38(S&T)-1987
75
SP : 38(!3&T)-1987
76
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
77
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
78
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
79
SP :38(S&T)-1987
80
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
81
SP :38(S&T)-1987
82
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
bOO.00 cm Slope I in 5
5 Purlins at 122.38 cm
83
SP : 38(S&Tb1987
84
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
85
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
86
Sl’ : 38(S&T)_1987
87
SP:38(S&T)-1987
88
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
89
. SP :38(S&T~1987
90
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
91
SP : 3b(S&T)-1987
92
SP : 38(s&T)_1987
cm kg kg.cm kg 4vm
I 128.57 (2) 4131.9 1596.6 (1) 11981.2 4538.5
1
2 257.14 (2) 3794.2 897.9 (1) 11236.0 2441.7
3 257.14 (2) 2983.8 249.4 (1) 9370.0 652.3
4 257.14 (2) 1773.9 549.0 (1) 6580.4 1262.4
5 135.53 (1) 12639.0 4 139.9 (2) 4440.2 1471.2
6 135.53 (I) 12650.0 3625.6 (2) 4602.6 1369.8
7 135.53 (1) 10860.0 827.0 (2) 3978.0 343.5
8 135.53 (I) 10846. I 1318.2 (2) 4134.7 548.8
9 135.53 (1) 8888.5 169.3 (2) 3448.1 28.9
93
SP : 38(S&T)_1987
--
TABLE 47 STEEL ROOF TRUSS (ANALYSIS RESULTS)
94
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
95
SP:38(S&T)-1987
%
SP : 38(S&T~l!M
97
SP:38(!S&T)-1987
98
SP:38(S&T)-1987
99
SP : 38&&TH987
100
SP :38(S&Tl-1987
101
SP:38(s&T)1987
102
SP : 38(!S&THB87
103
SR : 38(S&T)-1987
104
SP : 38(S&T)-1983
105
SPr 38(S&Tf19%7
107
SP:38(S&T)-1987
108
SP :38(s&T)l
I
Span 2400.00
cm Spacing 450.00 cm Slope I in 5
Wind force I50 kg,m* Panels 9 Purlins at 135.97 cm
cm kg kg.cm ke kg.cm
109
SP:38(S&T)-1987
111
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
112
SY : 38(5&T)-1987
113
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
cm kg kg.cm kg kgxm
115
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
116
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
Spa-l cm
2400.00 Spacing 600.00 cm Slope I in 5
Wind force 100 kg m2 Panels 9 Purlins at 135.97 cm
117
SP : 38(!?&T)-1987
118
SP : 38(s&T)-1987
119
SP:38(S&T)-1987
cm kg kg.cm kg kg.cm
120
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
121
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
122
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
123
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
cm 4 kg.cm kg kg.cm
1’24
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
125
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
126
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
127
SP : 38(S&T)_1987
128
SP : 38(S&T)1987
129
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
-
TABLE 83 STEEL ROOF TRUSS (ANALYSIS RESULTS)
130
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
131
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
cm kg kg.cm kg kg.cm
132
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
133
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
134
SP : 38(S&TH%7
135
SP : 38(S&T)_1987
--
TABLE 89 STEEL ROOF TRUSS (ANALYSES RESULTS)
136
SP : 38(!%T)-1987
137
SP : 38(SgbTbP9?37
-
TABLE 91 STEEL LEAN-TO ROOF TRUSS (ANALYSIS RESULTS)
Left Reaction
&_ r Her izlZI RrZrtical )
Dead load reaction 0.0 742.8 0.0 742.8
Live load reaction 0.0 788.4 0.0 788.4
Wind load reaction (without 25 percent reduction) 675.0 - 1620.0 675.0 - 1620.0
------
138
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
tm kg kg.cm kg k&ClD
139
TABLE 93 STEEL LEAN-TO ROOF TRUSS (ANALYSIS RESULTS)
cm kg kg.cm kg kg.cm
I 128.57 (2) 3819.1 1554.1 (1) 3869.2 1508.8
2 237.14 (2) 2912.4 1076.0 0) 3279.9 941.6
3 257.14 (2) 1136.7 307.5 (1) 1969.4 254.7
4 257.14 (2) 1615.3 985.4 (I) 3.3 709.6
5 135.53 (I) 4081.9 1416.8 (2) 4151.3 1496.5
6 135.53 (1) 4074.0 1462.7 (2) 4376.6 1743.2
7 135.53 (1) 2765.3 359.0 (2) 2772.7 479.7
8 135.53 (I) 2157. I 641.4 (2) 3005.2 863.4
9 135.53 (I) 1382.6 100.5 (2) 1325.2 210.3
140
SI’ : 38(S%T)-1987
141
YP : 38(S&T)-I987
142
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
143
SB : 38(S&T~1987
144
SP : 38(S&T)-l!I87
Span 900.00
cm Spacing 450.00 cm Slope I in 5
Wind force 150 kg/m2 Panels 7 Purlins, at 131.12 cm ’
cm kg kgsm kg kg.cm
145
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
146
SP : 3S(S&T)-1987
147
SP : 38(sbrT)-1987
148
SF : 38(S&T~1987
149
SF : 38@&T~1987
150
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
cm kg kg.cm kg kg.cm
151
51’ : 38(S&T)-1987
152
. .
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
153
SP :38(S&T)-1987
lxft Reactton
154
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
Left Reaction
155
YP : 38(S&T)_1987
156
SP :38(s&T)_19E7
157
SP : 38(S&T)4987
158
SP : I(S&T~lW7
cm kg kg.cm kg kg.cm
I 133.33 (2) 2579.2 1270.9 (1) 7633.3 3681.0
2 266.67 (2) 2217.2 725.4 (1) 6854.3 1970.8
3 266.67 (2) 1354.6 193.2 (1) 4903.0 510.7
4 266.67 (2) 4yJ. I 158.9 (1) 2942.8 407.3
5 266.67 (2) 808.0 389.7 (1) 4.3 885.2
6 137.44 (1) 7874.3 3422.3 (2) 2707. I 1190.9
7 137.44 (1) 7893.8 2940.4 (2) 2800.9 1113.9
8 137.44 (1) 6060.6 504.2 (2) 2072.4 202.4
9 137.44 (1) 6047.5 971.4 (2) 2159.5 404.3
159
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
160
SP :38(!3&T~1987
161
.SP : 38(S&T)-1987
162
SP :38(sEr)-1987
Giizzz-vertical)=
Dead load reaction 0.0 985.7 0.0 985.7
Live load reaction 0.0 1309.1 0.0 1309.1
Wind load reaction (without 25 percent reduction) 810.0 3523.5 810.0 3523.5
i63
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
164
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
165
SP : 38(33&T)-1987
166
TABLE 120 STEEL LEAN-TO ROOF TRUSS (ANALYSIS RESULTS)
Left Reaction
167
TABLE 121 STEEL LEAN-TO ROOF TRUSS (ANALYSIS RESULTS)
(iTo’;N’;;;;l;-
Vertical ‘r
Dead load reaction 0.0 1406.4 C?ZZZZTAT~>
0.0
Live load reaction 0.0 1613.9 0.0 1613:9
Wind load reaction (without 25 percent reduction) 9OO.lJ - 2880.0 990.0 - 2880.0
168
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
cm kg kg.cm b kgxm
169
TABLE 123 STEEL LEAN-TO ROOF TRUSS (AKALYSIS RESULTS)
_-- r __--,- -
Span ?2OO.oO cm Spacing 600.00 cm SIQpe I in 4
Wind forix 200 kg/m; Panels 9 Furtins at 137.44 cm
170
TAIL& I24 STEEL LEAN-TO ROOF TRUSS (ANALYSIS EWWfXSj
l-_-.- .-__
Spiul 12oO.CCt cm Spacing 600.00 cm Slopa lin5
%rtd fortx 100 kg/m2 Panels 9 RUIins at 135.97 cm
171
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
172
SP:38(S&T)-1987
173
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
174
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
cm kg kgxm kg kg.cm
175
SP : 38(S&TH987
176
SP:38(S&T)l987
Horizontal Vertical 1
Dead load reaction 0.0 1280.2 0.0 1280.2
Live load reaction 0.0 1513;1 0.0 1513.1
Wind load reaction (without 25 percent reduction) 843.8 - 2700.0 843.8 - 2700.0
177
SP : 38(5$&T)-1987
178
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
179
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
180
SP : 38(S&T)1987
181
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
182
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
183
SP : 38(5&T)-1987
184
SP:38(S&Tb1987
185
SP : 38(S&T~l!I87
186
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
187
TABLE 141STEEL LEAN-TO ROOF TRUSS (ANALYSIS RESULTS)
cm kg kg.cm kg kg.cm
188
Sf’ : M(S&T)-1987
-
TABLE IL42STEEL LEAN-TO ROOF TRUSS (ANALYSIS RESULTS)
_-___-
Span 1500.00 cm Spacing 600.00 cm Slope I in 5
Wind force 100 kg/m* Panels II Purlinr at 139.06 cm
189
SP : 38(S&T)_1987
191
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
Sum of Angles Weight (kg) 196.84 215.88 196.84 233.88 233.88 267.22
Sum of Angles Weight (kg) 207.60 224.30 225.6 242.3 242.3 285.28
192
SP : 38(S&T)4987
Suni of Angles Weight (kg) 220.11 257.53 238.11 273.63 263.99 299.51
193
SP : 38@&T)l987
Sum of Angles Weight (kg) 293.08 317.08 317.08 338.68 338.68 360.28
194
TABLE 149 STEEL A-TYPE ROOF TRUSSES (ISA SECTIONS)
Sum of Angles Weight (kg) 325.71 369.63 347.31 369.63 368.91 429.25
195
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
Sum of An&s Weight (kg) 361.09 433.96 382.69 433.96 409.08 466.28
1%
SP : 38(skT)-i987
197
SP : 38(54&T)-1987
198
SP : 38 (S&T)-1987
199
SP:38(S&T)-1987
Sum 01 Angles Weight (kg) 889.24 1009.16 956.12 1095.70 1057.52 1254.75
a00
SP :38(s&Tp1987.
Sum of Angles Weight (kg) 912.73 1097.63 940.05 1129.92 1040.65 1325.58
201
T.lBI.E 156 STEEL A-TYPE ROOF TRl.SSES (ISA SECTIONS)
Sum of Angles Weight (kg) 1058.96 1320.26 1063.12 1343.75 1i49.73 1410.83
-
(mj
-
3
TIE
TIE
I
2
1.36
2.73
2-lOO100 X 6
2-100100 X 6
2-100100
2-100100
x
x
8
8
2-8080
2-8080
X
X
8
8
2-100100
2-100100
X
x
8
8
2-100100
2-100100
X
X
8
8
2-130130
2-130130
X
X
8
8
5
TIE 3 2.73 2-100100 X 6 2-100100 X 8 2-8080 X 8 2-100100 x 8 2-100100 x 8 2-130130 X 8
Sum of Angles Weight (kg) 1484.81 1884.96 1554.27 1917.30 1718.32 2163.89
Sum of Angles Weight (kg) I. 1720.39 2018.95 1745.79 2032.04 1909.95 2215.43
MEMBERS
Cm)
TIE 1 2.25 5OL 5OL 65L 65L 65L 80L
TIE 2 2.25 5OL 5OL 65L 65L 65L 80L
Sum of Tubes Weight (kg) 104.04 121.67 122.90 145.23 144.13 164.63
Sum of Tubes Weight (kg) 132.92 146.74 140.62 160.31 150.84 186 83
206
SP : 38(S&TblW)7
Sum of Tubes Weight (kg) I44 85 177.5x 155.24 195.22 175.88 204.76
Unit Weight (kg m’) 1.58 3.29 3.91 3.62 4.34 3.79
(m)
Sum of Tubes Weight (kg) 187.72 190.39 206.71 208.04 230.23 255.12
207
Sf’ : 38(S&T)-I987
Su,m of lubes Weight (kg’ lY2.59 256X1 237.04 261 76 25 1.25 313.41
Unit Weqht ~hg I,> I 3.57 3.57 4 5’) 3.64 4.65 4.35
208
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
Sum of Tubes Weight (kg) 251.94 289.17 256.60 289.17 282.10 373.04
209
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
Sum of ‘Tubes Welpht !ka) 332.48 393.72 382.65 430.32 406.42 497.08
210
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
Sum of Tubes Weight (kg) 365.83 478.61 394.16 509.17 520.‘00 582.97
211
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
Sum of Tubes Weight (kg) 422.96 610.31 480.46 622.H6 566.82 622.86
212
SP : 38(S&T~l!M7
Sum 01 Tubes Weight (kg) 598.59 732.44 650.46 847.71 844.27 944.94
213
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
Sum of Tubes Weight (kg) 686.77 878.04 794.74 897.03 798.52 981.46
214
SP : 386&T)-1987
Sum ot Tubes Weight (kg) 812.16 975. !7 842.72 1029.58 939.47 108?.h7
215
51’ : 38 (S&T)-1987
Sum of Tubes Weight (kg) 1122.68 1394.55 1220.60 1469.35 1326.32 1634.04
217
SP:38(S&T)-1987
Sum of Tubes Weight (kg) 1206.96 1601.72 1304.65 1611.48 1353.22 1623.92
218
SP : 38(s&T)19s7
Sum of Tubes Weight (kg) 240.62 240.62 242.76 260.76 268.68 270.61
219
SP : 38(S&T~1987
Sum of Tubes Weight (kg) 22X.83 246.83 246.83 248.65 264.85 273.13
220
SI’ : 38(S&T)-1987
Sum of Tubes Weight (kg) 236.02 268.73 236.02 270.38 211.45 294.24
221
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
Sum 01 Tubes Welght (kg) 426.36 426.36 462.20 464.118 511.32 524.56
Unit Weight (kg m’) 7.90 5.92 8.56 6.46 9.47 7.29
222
SP :38(S&T)-1987
Sum of Tubes Weight (kg) 357.71 403.68 383.36 415.73 412.98 466.70
223
SP : 38(S&T)-1937
4s 51 431.20 505.57
0 ?: 7.9x 7.01
224
T.iBI,EI81 STEEI. LEAN-TO ROOF TRUSSES (ISA SECTIONS)
Span = 15 m Slope= I in 3 Purlins
Spacing
= 1.44m
Wind Pressure
= 100 ka,m' 150 kc/m' 200 kg/m*
SP~c.Ixti (m) SPACING (m) SPACING (m)
A /\
MEURERF 90s. l.l\Llll f-4.5 6.03 (4.5 6.03
(In)
Sum of Angles Weight (kg) 540.26 598.87 596.58 658.24 626.70 691.51
226
SP : 38(S&Tb1987
Sum of Angles Weight (kg) 511.61 573.08 536.84 598.67 578.67 657.57
227
%P : 38(S&T)-1987
Sum of Angles Weight (kg) 128.78 163.58 152.01 172.25 161.92 18!.43
228
-
TABLE 185 STEEL LEAN-TO ROOF TRUSSES (TUBE SECTIONS)
Sum of ‘Tubrx Weight (kg) 143.78 151.52 157.44 167.55 181.92 186.01
Sum of Tubes Weight (kal 144.67 186.06 159.85 213.98 IX9.h5 216.16
230
SP : 38 (S&T)-1 987
Sum of Tubes Weight (kg’) 243.83 268.87 268.20 289.25 3 12.38 t41.92
1.4i
SP : 3%(S&T)_1987
MEMHERS NO?,. LENG I’ll f 4.5 6.03 6.5 6.03 (4.5 6.0 >
(m)
Sum of Tubes Weight (kg) 214.30 265.43 258.26 298.47 260.95 319.32
232
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
Sum of Tubes Weight (kg) 247.16 290.79 278.75 312.84 295.73 372.27
Unit Weight (kg: m2) 4.58 4.04 3.16 4.35 5.48 5.17
233
SP : 38(S&Tb1987
Sum of Tubes Wright (kg) 159.8 I 416.65 393.21 473.67 439.57 494.43
Sum of Tub Weight (kg) 349.21 403.65 385.88 4 14.04 403 22 473.99
235
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
Sum of Tubes Weight (kg) 335.82 411.74 359.46 412.07 417.27 474.44
236
TAB1.E 193 CANTILEVER COLUMN SECTIONS FOR STEEL ROOF TRIISSES
I in 3 100 4.5 2232 118 95 722 1453 2001.19 8 175/ 19.3 175/22:1 150/27.1
100 6.0 2423 --- 124 959 2564 275133.0 225j31.2 200128.8 150/27.1
IS0 4.5 2232 726 143 1082 2180 250127.9 200,25.4 175122.1 15Oj27.1
I50 6.0 2423 582 186 1436 3846 300137.7 250137.3 225133.9 200137.3
200 4.5 2232 1333 191 1443 2907 250’ 27.9 225;31.2 200: 20.0 ISOj27.l
200 h0 x23 I I90 24x 1918 5129 325143. I 300144.2 250140.9 200/37.3
I in 4 100 ‘I5 2354 124 97 700 1358 2001 19.8 1751 I9 3 175122.1 150/27.1
100 6.0 2545 - 125 938 2436 250127.9 225131.2 200128.0 150/27.1
150 45 2354 732 I45 I050 2037 225123.5 200125.4 175122.1 150127. I
110 6.0 2545 588 188 1406 3655 3004 37.5 25Oj 37.3 225133.9 2OOj37.3
200 4.5 2354 I339 194 1400 2716 250: 27.9 225131.2 200j28.8 l50/27.1
200 6.0 2545 1196 251 I875 4073 325143. I 300144.2 250140.9 200137.3
I in 5 100 4.5 2420 127 104 693 I326 200119.0 175119.3 ISO/ 17.0 I50127,I
100 6.0 2619 - 132 930 2394 2503 27.9 225131.2 200/28.8 150/27.1
I50 4.5 2428 734 I55 1040 1909 225123.5 200/ 25.4 175122.1 150/27.l
150 6.0 2619 591 199 1396 3591 300137.7 250j37.3 225133.9 200137.3
200 4.5 2420 I342 208 1387 2652 250127.9 225125.4 200/28.8 150/27.1
200 6.3 2619 II98 266 1861 4788 325143. I 300144.2 250140.9 200/37.3
NWE -The Iorces presented in the above table are after 25% reduction. if the wind load is one of the loads in the combination to account
The column axial forces do not include the wall cladding weight (30 kg/mz).
TABLE 194CANTILEVER COLUMN SECTIONS FOR STEEL ROOF TRUSSES
TrussSpan = 9.0 m Column Spacing = 6.0 m
I in 3 100 4.5 3126 45 128 962 1938 225/23.5 200125.4 175/22.1 150/27.1
100 6.0 3381 165 1278 3419 275133.0 250131.3 225133.9 200137.3
150 4.5 3126 855 191 1443 2907 250127.9 225131.2 200128.8 150/27.1
150 6.0 3381 664 248 1918 5129 326143.1 300144.2 250140.9 200/37:3
200 4.5 2126 I665 255 1925 3877 275/33.0 225:31.2 200/28.8 200137.3
200 6.0 338 I I474 331 2557 6838 350149.5 350152.4 250140.9 225/43.1
I in 4 100 4.5 3288 53 129 934 1810 225123.5 200/25.4 175/22.1 150127.1
100 6.0 3543 167 1250 3249 275133.0 250137.3 225133.9 200/37.3
150 4.5 3288 863 194 1400 2716 250127.9 200/25.4 200/28.8 150127.1
150 6.0 3543 672 251 1875 4873 325143.1 300144.2 250140.9 200/37.3
200 4.5 3288 I673 258 1868 3621 275/33.0 225131.2 200/28.8 200/37.3
200 6.0 3543 1482 335 250 I 6498 350149.5 350/52.4 250140.9 225143.1
1 in 5 100 4.5 3387 57 138 924 1768 200119.8 200125.4 175122.1 150/27.1
100 6.0 3642 176 1241 3192 275/33.0 250/37.3 225133.9 200/37.3
150 4.5 3387 867 208 1387 2652 250127.9 200/25.4 200/28.8 150/27.1
150 6.0 3642 676 265 1861 4708 325143.1 300/44.2 250140.9 200/37.3
200 4.5 3387 I677 277 I849 3536 275133.0 225131.2 200128.8 150134.6
200 6.0 3642 1486 353 248 1 6385 350149.5 350152.4 250140.9 225143.1
NOTE-The forces presented in the above table are after 25% reduction, if the wind load is one of the loads in the combination to account
I
ior 33 - o/u increase m allowable stress.
3
The column axial forces do not include the wall clad ing weight (30 kg/m*).
TABLE 195 CANTILEVER COLUMN SECTIONS FOR STEEL ROOF TRUSSES
I in 4 100 4.5 2935 318 101 696 1341 200119.8 175j19.3 175122.1 150/27.1
100 6.0 3126 175 129 934 2414 2jOl27.9 225131.2 200128.8 IM/27.1
E 100
150
9.0
4.5
3909
2935
-
1128
186
151
1408
1045
5499
2011
400156.9
225123.5
350152.4
200125.4
300/48. I
175122.1
225143. I
150/27.1
I50 6.0 3126 985 194 1400 3621 3OOi31.7 250137.3 225133.9 2oB/ 37.3
I50 9.0 3509 698 279 2112 8249 450/65.3 450172.4 400166.7 250154.7
200 4.5 2935 1938 201 1393 2682 250!27.9 225131.2 200128.8 I50/27.1
200 6.0 3126 1795 259 1868 4828 325143.1 300144.2 250140.9 200137.3
200 9.0 3509 1508 312 2816 10999 500/75.0 5OOi86.9 450/ 19.4 300/63.0
I in 5 100 4.5 3034 322 110 681 I298 2OOjl9.8 115/19.3 I so/ 17.0 150/27.1
100 6.0 3225 118 138 924 2357 250127.9 225131.2 200128.8 I50/27.l
100 9.0 3608 195 1399 5414 350149.5 350152.4 300/48.1 225143. I
150 4.5 3034 1132 165 1031 1948 225/23.5 200/25.4 175122.1 15Oj27.1
150 6.0 3225 988 208 1387 3536 3OOi31.7 250137.3 225133.9 200137.3
150 9.0 3608 101 293 2098 8122 450165.3 450172.4 400/66.7 250/51.0
200 4.5 3034 1942 220 1314 2591 250121.9 200125.4 200/28.8 150/27.1
200 6.0 3225 I798 267 1849 4115 325143.1 300144.2 250/40.9 200137.3
200 9.0 3608 1511 391 2813 10829 500/75.0 SOOi86.9 450179.4 300/63.0
NOTE -The forces presented in the above table are after 25% reduction if the wind load is one of the loads m the combination to account
The column axial forces do not include the wall cladding weight (30 kg/mZ).
TABLE 196 CANTILEVER COLUMN SECTIONS FOR STEEL ROOF TRUSSES
I in 4 100 4.5 4094 289 134 928 I788 225123.5 200125.4 175122.1 150/27.1
100 6.0 4349 98 172 I245 3119 275; 33.0 250137.3 225133.9 200137.3
100 9.0 4859 248 1877 7332 45Oi65.3 450172.4 350156.9 25Oj51.0
TSO 4.5 4094 I369 201 1393 2682 250,27.9 200/25.4 2OOj28.8 150/27.1
150 6.0 4349 1178 258 1868 4428 325143.1 300/44.2 250140.9 200137.3
150 9.0 4859 795 372 2816 10999 5QO/75.0 500186.9 450179.4 300163.0
200 4.5 4094 2449 268 1858 3576 275,‘33.0 225/31.2 200128.8 200137.3
200 6.0 4349 2258 344 2490 6438 350149.5 350152.4 250140.9 225143. I
200 9.0 4859 1875 497 3755 I4665 6OOi99.5 550/103.7 500195.2 400177.4
1 in 5 100 4.5 4225 294 146 916 1731 200/ 19.8 200/ 25.4 175122.1 150/27.1
100 6.0 4480 103 I85 1232 3143 275; 33.0 250137.3 225133.9 200137.3
loo 9.0 4990 - 260 1865 7219 450 /_65.3 450172.4 350156.9 250151.0
150 4.5 4225 I374 220 1374 2597 250127.9 ZOO/25.4 200: 28.8 150127.1
150 6.0 4480 1183 267 I849 4715 325143. I 300/44.2 250/40:9 ZOO/37.3
150 9.0 4990 800 391 2798 10829 500/ 75.0 500; 86.9 450179.4 360163.0
200 4.5 4225 2454 293 I832 3463 275/33.0 225131.2 200128.8 150134.6
200 6.0 4480 2263 369 2465 6287 350i49.5 350: 52.4 250140.9 225143. I
200 9.0 4990 1880 521 3731 14439 600199.5 550/ 103.7 500195.2 400177.4
Nor!: ---The forces presented in the above table are after ‘5~~ reduction, if the wind load is one of the loads in the combination to account
The column axial forces do not include the wall cladding weight (30 kg’m’).
TABLE 197 CANTILEVER COLUMN SECTIONS FOR STEEL ROOF TRUSSES
SLOPE WlVI OF / \ k
PRtSSl:WE COLUMN ’ COm- Tension Shear at Base ’ I ISLB ISMB ISWB ISHB 1
pression m Moment
I in 3 100 6.0 4087 520 134 969 2624 275: 33.0 225131.2 200/28.8 15Ol27.1
100 9.0 4469 233 I91 1443 5815 400/ 56.9 400/61.6 ,300/48.1 225146.8
100 12.0 4852 248 1918 10258 600199.5 550/ 103.7 450179.4 400177.4
150 6.0 4087 1735 201 1454 3937 300137.7 250/ 37.3 225133.9 200137.3
150 9.0 4469 1448 287 2165 8723 500/75.0 450172.4 400/66.7 300/58.8
I50 1:..0 4852 1161 373 2876 15387 - 600/122.6 SOp/95.2 -
200 6.0 4087 2950 269 1938 5249 325/43. I 300144.2 250140.9 200137.3
200 9.0 4469 2663 383 2887 I1631 55Oj86.3 5Wj86.9 450179.4 350167.4
200 12.0 4852 2376 497 3836 20516 - 600/ 122.6 550/112.5 -
I in 4 100 6.0 4330 532 137 926 2369 250/ 27.9 225/31.2 200/28.8. 150127.1
100 9.0 4712 245 194 1400 5432 350j49.5 350152.4 300/48.1 225143.1
100 12.0 5095 251 la75 9746 6OO/p5.5 5501103.7 450179.4 350172.4
I50 6.0 4330 1747 205 1389 3554 300137.7 250137.3 225133.9 200137.3
150 9.0 4712 1460 290 2101 8148 450/65.3 450172.4 400166.7 25Ol51.0
I50 12.0 5095 1173 376 2813 I4620 550/ 103.7 500/95.2 450192.5
200 6.0 4330 2962 273 1853 4738 325143. I 300144.2 250140.9 200137.3
200 9.0 4712 2675 387 2801 10864 500/75.0 500j86.9 450/79.4 300163.0
200 12.0 5095 2388 502 3750 19493 600/ 122.6 5501112.5 -
I in 5 100 6.0 4478 538 151 912 2284 250127.b 225131.2 200/28.8 150127.1
100 9.0 4860 251 208 I387 5305 35Ol49.5 350/ 52.4 300/48.1 225143.1
100 12.0 5243 265 1816 9577 600/99.5 550/ 103.7 45op9.4 35Ol72.4
150 6.0 4478 1753 226 1368 3426 300/ 37.7 250137.3 225133.9 200137.3
150 9.0 4860 1466 311 2080 7957 450165.3 450172.4 400166.7 2pOl51.0
150 12.0 5243 1179 398 2792 14266 600199.5 550/ 103.7 500195.2 450187.2
200 6.0 4478 2968 302 1824 4569 325143. I 300144.2 250140.9 200137.3
200 9.0 4860 269 I 416 2774 10610 500/ 75.0 500/ 86.9 450179.4 300/63.(l
200 12.0 5243 2394 530 3722 19154 6001122.6 550/112.5 -
NOTE --The forces presented in the above table are after 25% reduction, if th’e wind .load is one of the loads in the combination to account
The column axial forces do not include the wall cladding weight (30 kg/m*),
a
TABLE 198 CANTILEVER COLUMN SECTIONS FOR STEEL ROOF TRUSSES ..
Truss Span = 18.0 m Column Spacing = 6.0 n
1 in 4 100 6.0 6013 530 182 1235 3159 275133.0 250137.3 225133.9 200137.3
100 9.0 6523 147 258 1868 7242 450165.3 450172.4 350156.9 25O/Sl.O
100 12.0 7033 - 335 2500 12995 609199.5 550/ 103.7 500195.2 450187.2
ISQ 6.0 6013 2150 273 1853 4738 325143. I 300144.2 250140.9 200137.3
I50 9.0 6523 1767 381 2801 10864 500/75.0 500186.9 450179.4 300/63.0
I50 12.0 7033 1385 502 3750 19493 - 600/ 122.6 55OiIl2.5 -
200 6.0 6013 3770 364 2471 6318 350149.5 350/ 52.4 250140.9 225143. I
200 9.0 6523 3387 516 3736 14485 600/99.5 550/ 103.7 500195.2 400177.4
200 12.0 7033 3005 669 5000 2599 1 - 6001133.7 -
1 in 5 100 6.0 6211 537 201 1216 3046 275133.0 250137.3 200/28.8 200137.3
100 9.0 6721 155 277 1849 7073 450165.3 400/61.6 350156.9 250151.0
100 12.0 723 I - 353 248 1 I2769 609199.5 550/ 103.7 500/95.2 450187.2
150 6.0 6211 2157 302 1824 4569 325143. I 300144.2 250140.9 200/ 37.3
I50 9.0 6721 1775 416 2774 10610 m/ 75.0 500/ 86.9 450179.4 350/ 58.8
IS0 12.0 7231 1392 530 3722 19154 - &XI/ 122.6 550/ 112.5 -
200 6.0 6211 3777 402 2432 6092 350149.5 350152.4 250140.9 225143. I
200 9.0 6721 3395 554 3698 14146 6&X3/99.5 500186.9 500195.2 400177.4
200 12.0 7231 3012 707 4963 25539 - - 600/ 133.7 -
NOTE-The forces presented in the above table are after 25% reduction, if the wind load is one of the loads in the combination to account
The column axial forces do not include the wall cladding weight (30 kg/m*).
TABLE 199 CANTILEVER COLUMN SECTIONS FOR STEEL ROOF TRUSSES
. Iin 100 9.0 6167 570 220 1374 5195 350/ 49.5 350/52.4 300/481 225143.1
100 12.0 6550 283 502. 1849 943 1 600/ 99.5 550/ 103.7 450179.4 350167.4
150 9.0 6167 2190 330 2061 7792 450165.3 450/72.4 400166.7 250/51.0
150 12.0 6550 1903 416 2774 14146 600199.5 550/ 103.7 500195.2 450187.2
200 9.0 6167 3810 440 2749 10390 500/ 75.0 500/ 86.9 450179.4 300/ 58.8
200 12.0 6550 3523 554 3698 18862 6001122.6 55OlIl2.5 -
Nom-The forces presented in the above table are after 25% reduction, if the wind load is one of the loads in the combination to account
The column axial forces do not include the wall cladding weight (30 kg/ms).
TABLE 200 CANTILEVER COLUMN SECTIONS FOR iTEEL ROOF TRUSSES
1 in 4 100 9.0 8260 525 268 I858 7152 450/65.3 450/ 72.4 350/56.9 250151.0
100 12.0 8770 142 344 2490 I2876 600189.5 550/ 103.7 500/95.2 450187.2
I50 9.0 8260 2685 402 2786 10729 500; 75.0 500186.9 450/ 79.4 300163.0
150 12.0 8770 2302 516 3736 19314 600/ 122.6 550/ 112.5
200 9.0 8260 4845 536 3716 14305 600;99.5 550/ 103.7 500/95.2 400/77.4
200 12.0 8770 4462 689 498 I 25752 6001133.7
I in 5 100 9.0 8523 535 293 1832 6926 450’65.3 4OOi61.6 55Oj56.9 250/51.0
100 12.0 9033 152 369 2465 I2574 600/99.5 5501103.7 500195.2 450187.2
150 9.0 8523 2695 440 2749 10390 5Ooi75.0 500; 86.9 450/ 79.4 300/58.8
150 12.0 9033 2312 554 3698 I8862 600) 122.6 55r)/ I 12.5
200 9.0 8523 4855 587 3665 I3854 55Oj86.3 500; 86.9 500, 95.2 NO/ 77.4
200 12.0 9033 4472 739 4931 25149 600’ 133.7
NOTE -The forces presented in the above table are after 25Y0 reduction, if the wind load is one’of the loads in the combination to account
The column axial forces do not includr the wall cladding weight (30 kg, ml).
TABLE 201 CANTILEVER COLUMN SECTIONS FOR STEEL ROOF TRUSSES
I in 4 100 9.0 7281 839 209 1385 5297 350149.5 3501’52.4 300/48.1 225143.1
100 12.0 7664 552 267 1860 9567 600/99.5 550,‘103.7 450179.4 350: 72.4
150 9.0 728 I 2864 313 2078 7945 450!65.3 450: 72.4 400/66.7 250151.0
150 12.0 7664 2577 398 2i90 14350 550,’ 103.7 500195.2 450/87.2
200 9.0 728 I 4889 417 277 I 10594 500/75.0 5OOi86.9 450/79.4 300: 63.0
200 12.0 7664 4602 531 372 I 13134 6Oti 122.6 550/ 112.5
I in 5 100 9.0 7528 848 232 1362 5085 350149.5 350 152.4 300:48.1 225/ 43. I
100 12.0 7910 561 289 1837 9284 600199.5 5501103.7 450179.4 350/ 67.4
150 9.0 7528 2873 348 2043 7628 450;65.3 450/72.4 350/56.9 25015 I .o
150 12.0 7910 2586 434 2755 I3927 600,99.5 550; 103.7 500195.2 450187.2
200 9.0 7528 4898 464 2725 10170 500/75.0 5OOi86.9 450; 79.4 3OQ58.8
200 12.0 7910 461 I 578 3674 I8569 600/ 122.6 550; 112.5
NOTE --The forces presented in the above table are after 2506 reduction, if the wind load is one of the loads in the combination to account
The column axial forces do not include the wall cladding weight (30 kg/m2).
TABLE 202 CANTILEVER COLUMN SECTIONS FOR STEEL ROOF TRUSSES
I in 3 100 9.0 4528 82% 273 1943 7915 450165.3 450172.4 400166.7 25015 I .O
100 12.0 10039 439 349 2575 13892 600199.5 550/103.7 500/95.2 450187.2
150 9.0 9528 3522 410 2914 II872 550j86.3 5OOi86.9 450179.4 350167.4
150 12.0 10039 3139 524 3863 20833 6001122.6 550/ 112.5
200 9.0 9528 6222 546 3885 I5830 6oOi99.5 550/ 103.7 500195.2 400/ 77.4
200 12.0 10039 5809 698 5150 27784 600/ 133.7 -
I in 4 100 9.0 I0069 848 278 1847 7063 450165.3 400/61.6 350156.9 25O/Sl.O
100 12.0 10579 466 354 2480 I2756 6OOi99.5 5501103.7 5OOi95.2 450/ 87.2
150 9.0 10069 3548 417 277 I 10594 500/ 75.0 500186.9 450/ 79.4 300/63.0
150 12.0 10579 3166 531 372 I 19134 600! 122.6 550, 112.5
200 9.0 10069 6248 557 3695 14126 600/99.5 550/ 103.7 5OOi95.2 400177.4
200 12.0 10579 5866 709 4961 25512 6Oq/ 133.7
I in 5 100 9.0 10397 861 309 1817 6780 400/ 56.9 400161.6 350; 56.9 25015 I .o
100 12.0 10907 479 386 2449 I2379 600199.5 5501103.7 500195.2 400/82.2
150 9.0 10397 3561 464 2725 10170 500/75.0 500/86.9 450179.4 3OOi58.8
150 12.0 10907 3179 578 3674 I8569 6001 122.6 5501 112.5
200 9.0 10397 626 I 619 3633 13561 550; 86.3 500186.9 450,79.4 350/ 72.4
200 12.0 10907 5879 ‘77 I 4898 24759 600/ 133.7
Norm-The forces presented in the above table are after 2576 reduction, if the wind load is one of the loads in the combination to account
I
for 333 % increase in allowable stress.
The column axial forces do not include the wall cladding weight (30 kgim2).
TABLE 203 CANTILEVER COLUMN SECTIONS FOR LEAN-TO ROOF TRIISSES
I in 3 IO0 4.5 2143 I85 275 1202 2262 250/ 27.9 200/25.4 175/22.1 150127.1
I00 6.0 2335 41 304 1139 3643 300/37.7 250137.3 225133.9 200137.3
150 4.5 2143 792 398 1352 3394 275133.0 225131.2 200,!28.8 150/30.6
I50 6.0 2335 649 456 1708 5464 325143. I 300/44.2 250140.9 200137.3
200 4.5 2143 1400 551 ‘1803 4526 275133.0 250137.3 225133.9 200137.3
200 6.0 2335 ’ 1256 608 2277 7286 350149.5 350152.4 300148. I 225143.1
I in 4 100 4.5 2265 191 228 854 2049 225i23.5 200125.4 175122.1 150127. I
100 6.0 2456 47 257 1091 3358 275133.0 250137.3 225133.9 200137.3
I50 4.5 2265 798 342 128 3073 250127.9 225131.2 200/28.8 150127.1
I50 6.0 2456 655 385 1637 5037 325143. I 300/44.2 250/40.9 200137.3
200 4.5 2265 1406 456 1708 4098 275/ 33.0 250-/ 37.3 225133.9 200/ 37.3
200 6.0 2456 I262 513 2183 6716 350/49.5 350152.4 250/40.5 225143. I
1 in 5 loo 4.5 2339 300 200 825 1921 225123.5 200125.4 175/22.1 150/27.1
I00 6.0 2530 156 228 Id63 3187 276133.0 250137.3 225133.9 200/37.3
I.50 4.5 2339 960 299 1238 288 I 250127.9 225131.2 200128.8 150/27.1
150 6.0 2530 817 342 1594 4781 325/43.1 300144.2 250/ 40.9 200137.3
200 4.5 2339 1621 399 1651 3842 275133.0 225131.2 200128.8 200137.3
200 6.0 2530 1478 456 2126 6375 350149.5 350152.4 250/40.9 225143. I
NOTE -The forces presented in the above table are after 25 % reduction, if the wind load is one of the loads m the combination to account
The column axial forces do not include the wall cladding weight (30 kg/m2).
~~__~~
TABLE 204 CANTILEVER COLUMN SECTIONS FOR LEAN-TO ROOF TRUSSES
PRESSURE COLUMN f Com- Tension Shear at Base &LB ISMB ISWB ISHB ’
pression fCaP Base) Moment
(kg/W Cm) (kg) (kg) (kg) (kg). (km)
1 in 3 100 4.5 2978 156 367 1202 3017 250127.9 225131.2 200/28.8 15Oj27.1
100 6.0 3233 405 1518 4857 325143. I 300/44.2 250140.9 200137.3
1.50 4.5 2978 966 551 1803 4525 275133.0 250137.3 225133.9 200/37.3
I50 6.0 3233 775 608 2277 7286 350149.5 350152.4 300/48.1 225143. I
200 4.5 2978 1776 734 2404 6034 300/37.7 300/44.2 250/40.9 200/40.0
200 6.0 3233 1585 811 3036 9715 400/ 56.9 400/61.6 350156.9 250/ 5 1.o
I in 4 loo 4-5 3140 164 304 II39 2732 250/ 27.9 200/ 25.4 200/28.8 150/27.1
100 6.0 3395 _ 342 1455 4477 3OOi37.7 300/44.2 250140.9 200137.3
I50 4.5 3140 974 456 I708 4098 275! 33.0 25Oi37.3 225133.9 200137.3
150 6.0 3395 783 513 2183 6716 350/49.5 350j52.4 250/40.9 225143.1
200 4.5 3140 I784 608 2277 5464 300/37.7 250137.3 250140.9 200137.3
200 6.0 3395 1593 684 2910 8955 400156.9 M/61.6 300/ 48. I 250/s I .o
I in 5 100 4.5 3239 310 366 II00 2561 250/ 27.9 200125.4 200/28.8 150/27.1
too 6.0 3494 119 304 1417 4250 300137.7 250137.3 225133.9 200137.3
I50 4.5 3239 I I91 399 1651 3842 2751’33.0 225131.2 200/ 28.8 200137.3
IS0 6.0 3494 1000 456 2126 6375 350149.5 350152.4 250/40.9 225143. I
200 4.5 3239 2072 532, 220 I 5123 3Oq37.7 250137.3 225133.9 200137.3
200 6.0 3494 1880 608 2834 8500 400: 56.9 400161.6 300/48. I 250! 5 I .o
NOTE ---The forces presented in the above table are after 255% reduction, if the wind load is one of the loads in the combination to account
‘The column axial forces do not include the wall cladding weight (30 kg/m*).
TABLE 205 CANTILEVER COLUMN SECTIONS FOR LEAN-TO R.OOF TRUSSES
I in 4 loo 4.5 2823 402 215 902 2262 250121.9 200125.4 115/22.1 150/21.1
100 6.0 3014 259 304 1139 3643 300137.7 250137.3 225133.9 200131.3
100 9.0 3396 - 361 1613 450112.4 350156.9 250151.0
P 150 4.5 2823 1212 413 1352
7342
3394
450165.3
215133.0 225131.2 200128.8 I M/ 34.6
I50 6.0 3014 1069 456 II08 5464 325143. I 300144.2 250140.9 200137.3
150 9.0 3396 182 542 2120 11014 500/ 75.0 500186.9 450119.4 300163.0
200 4.5 2823 2022 551 1803 4525 275133.0 250137.3 225133.9 200131.3
200 6.0 3014 1819 608 2271 1286 350149.5 350152.4 300148. I 225143. I
200 9.0 3396 I592 122 3226 14685 600195.5 55Ol103.7 500195.2 400/17.4
1 in 5 100 4.5 2921 548 237 863 2092 225123.5 200125.4 115122. I 150/21. I
IO0 6.0 3113 404 266 1100 3415 275133.0 250131.3 225133.9 200137.3
100 9.0 3495 II8 322 I515 7001 450165.3 4OOl61.6 350156.9 25015 1 .O
150 4.5 2921 1429 356 1295 3138 250121.9 225131.2, 200128.8 I50/21. I
150 6.0 3113 1285 399 1651 5123 325143. I 300144.2 250140.9 2OOj31.3
150 9.0 3495 999 485 2363 10501 500/15.0 5@0/ 86.9 450119.4 300/58.8
200 4.5 2921 2310 415 1127 4184 275133.0 250131.3 225133.9 2OOl31.3
200 6.0 3113 2166 532 2201 6830 350149.5 350152.4 300148.1 225143. I
200 9.0 3495 1879 646 3150 14002 550186.3 500186.9 500195.2 350112.4 &
..
NOTE -The forces presented in the above table are after 25% reduction, if the wind load is one of the loads in the combination to account
The column axial forces do not include the wall cladding weight (30 kg/m*).
TABLE 206 CANTILEVER COLUMN SECTIONS FOR LEAN-TO ROOF TRUSSES
I in 4 100 4.5 3914 424 367 1202 3017 250/ 27.9 225131.2 200/28.8 150127.1
100 6.0 4169 233 405 1518 4857 325143. I 300144.2 250140.9 200137.3
100 9.0 4679 482 2150 9790 sOO/ 75.0 450172.4 400166.7 300/58.8
150 4.5 3914 1504 551 1803 4525 275133.0 250137.3 225133.9 200137.3
150 6.0 4169 1313 600 2277 7286 350149.5 350/52.4 300/48.1 225143.1
150 9.0 4679 980 722 3226 14685 600199.5 550/103.7 500195.2 400/77.4
200 4.5 3914 2584 734 2404 6034 300/37.7 300/44.2 250140.9 200/40.0
200 6.0 4169 2392 811 3036 9715 400156.9 400/61.6 350156.9 250151.0
200 9.0 4679 2010 963 430 I 19580 - 550/103.7 500195.2 450187.2
I in 5 100 4.5 4045 618 317 1151 2789 250127.9 225131.2 200/28.8 150127.1
100 6.0 4300 427 355 1467 4553 300137.7 300/44.2 25Oj40.9 200/37.3
100 9.0 4810 45 431 2100 9334 500/75.0 450/72.4 400166.1 3OOl58.b
150 4.5 4045 1793 475 I727 4184 .275/33.0 250137.3 225133.9 200137.3
150 6.0 4300 1601 532 2201 6830 350149.5 350/52.4 250140.9 225143.1
150 9.0 4810 1219 646 3150 14002 55Ol86.9 500/86.9 450: 79.4 350172.4
200 4.5 4045 2967 633 2303 5578 300/37.7 250/37.3 250140.9 200137.3
200 6.0 4300 2776 710 2935 910? 400156.9 400/61.6 300148. I 250/51.0
200 9.0 4810 2393 862 4200 18667 600199.5 550/103.7 500195.2 450187.2
NOTE -- The forces presented in the above table are after 25% reduction, if the wind load is one of the loads in the combination to account
‘The column axial forces do not include the wall cladding weight (30 kg/mz).
TABLE 207 CANTILEVER COLUMN SECTIONS FOR LEAN-TO ROOF TRUSSES
1 in 4 100 4.5 3387 609 322 949 2476 250127.9 200125.4 200/28.8 I50127.1
100 6.0 3579 466 351 1186 3927 300137.7 250137.3 225133.9 200137.3
100 9.0 3961 179 408 1661 7769 45Oi65.3 450172.4 350156.9 25G/SI.O.
150 4.5 3387 1621 484 1423 3114 275133.0 225131.2 200128.8 150/27.1
150 6.0 3679 1478 527 1779 5891 325143. I 300144.2 250140.9 200/40.0
150 9.0 3961 1191 613 249 I 11654 550186.3 500/86.9 450179.4 350167.4
200 4.5 3387 2634 646 1898 4952 300137.7 250137.3 250133.9 200137.3
200 6.0 3579 249 I 703 2372 7855 350149.5 350152.4 300148.1 225146.8
200 9.0 3961 2204 817 3321 15539 6OOl99.5 5501 103.7 500195.2 4Ool77.4
1 in 5 100 4.5 3511 791 275 902 2262 250127.9 200125.4 115l22.1 la/??.1
100 6.0 3702 647 304 1139 3643 300137.7 250137.3 225133.9 200/3?.3
:OO, 9.0 4384 361 361 1613 7342 450165.3 450172.4 350156.9 250/51.1
150 4.5 3511 1892 413 3152 3394 275133.0 225131.2 200128.8 150134.6
150 6.0 3702 I749 456 1705 5464 325143.1 300144.2 250140.9 2uof37.3
150 9.0 4084 1462 542 2120 11014 500/75.0 500186.9 450179.4 350167.4
200 4.5 3511 2993 550 1803 4525 275133.0 250137.3 225133.9 200137.3
200 6.0 3702 2850 608 2279 7286 350149.5 350152.4 300/48.1 225143.1
200 9.0 4084 2563 722 3226 14685 600199.5 550/ 103.7 500195.2 400177.4
Ncic - The forces presented in the above table are after 25% reduction, if the wind load is one of the loads in the combination to account
The column axial forces do not include the wall ciadding weight (30 kg/m2).
TABLE 208 CANTILEVER COLUMN SECTIONS FOR LEAN-TO ROOF TRUSSES
I in 4 I00 4.5 4691 677 431 1265 3002 250127.9 225131.2 200/28.8 I501 27. I
100 6.0 4952 486 468 1581 5237 325143. I 300144.2 250140.9 200137.3
100 9.0 5462 103 546 2214 10359 500/ 75.0 SOO/86.9 400/66.? 300/58.8
I50 4.5 4691 2027 646 1898 4953 300/ 37.7 250/3?.3 225143.9 200/ 37.3
150 6.0 4952 1836 703 2372 7855 350149.5 350/52.4 300/48.1 225146.8
I50 9.0 5462 I453 817 3396 I5539 600/99.5 550/103.? 500195.2 400/?7.4
200 4.5 4697 3377 861 2530 6004 325143. I 300144.2 250140.9 225143.1
200 6.0 4952 3186 937 3163 10474 450165.3 450172.4 350156.9 250154.7
200 9.0 5462 2803 1089 4428 20719 - @IO/ 122.6 500195.2 450/8?.2
I in 5 IO0 4.5 4861 920 367 1202 1117 250127.9 225131.2 200/28.8 150/27.1
I00 6.0 5116 728 405 1518 4857 325143. I 300144.2 25Oi40.9 2OOj37.3
100 9.0 5626 346 482 2150 9790 5OOl75.0 500186.9 400166.7 300/58.8
I50 4.5 4861 2388 551 1803 4526 275133.0 250137.3 225133.9 200137.3
I50 6.0 5116 2197 608 2277 7286 350149.5 350/ 52.4 300/48.1 225143. I
I50 9.0 5626 1814 722 3226 14685 60019a.5 550/ 103.7 500195.2 400/??.4
200 4.5 4861 3856 735 2404 6034 300/3?.? 300/44.2 250140.9 225143. I
200 6.0 5116 3665 811 3036 9715 400156.9 400/61.6 350/56.9 250/51.0
200 9.0 5626 3282 963 4301 19580 - 550/ 103.7 SOO/95.2 450187.2
NOTE -The forces presented in the above table are after 25% reduction, if the wind load is one of the loads in the combination to account
The column axial forces do not include the wall cladding weight (30 kg/ml).
SP : 38(S&T)_1987
5.0 7.5 10 m
W CW WB W CW WB W CW WB W CW WB
NOTE -The Girder Sec:ion is an I section with top channel (see Fig. 5, 45).
253
SP:38(S&T)-1987
NOTE-The Gird& Section is an 1 section with top channel (see Fig. 5, 45).
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
255
SP:38(S&T)-1987
CRANE TRUSS TOTAL BASIC CWUMN ABOVE CRANE CAP COLUMN BELOW CRANE CAP
CAPACITY SPACING COLUMN WIND h h
/ \ r
HEIGHT PRESSURE ’ Design Forces Design ’ ’ Design Design Sections”’ 1
A A
e Y Y
’ Axial Moment i Section Axial ( ISMB ISMC ‘,
Force”’ ISMB Force”.”
U) (ml (m) (kg/t+) (T) (Tm) (T)
100 5.86 I.511 250137.3 26.395 175119.3 200/22.1
8.25 150 5.86 2.134 250137.3 29.974 200/25.4 200/22. I
200 5.86 2.757 300/44.2 33.554 200/25.4 225125.9’
4.5 9.75 loo 5.86 1.51 I 250137.3 29.712 200/25.4 200/22. I
150 5.86 2.134 .250/37.3 34.669 200/25.4 225125.9
200 5.86 2.757 300/44.2 39.626 225131.2 250130.4
IO 100 7.78 1.961 250137.3 32.818 200125.4 200/u. I
256
TABLE 214 FOUNDATION FORCES FOR CRANE COLUMN FOOTINGS
SPAN SPACING COLUMN CAPACITY TRUSS LOAD WIND LOAD CRANE LOAD
HEIGHT OF A h A
fl \ *
Nom- 1. TO obtain wind forces for basic wind pressures of 100 kg/m* and I50 kg/m2 reduce the wind forces given in the table proportionately.
2. Crane load axial force is the vertical load transmitted by the gentry girder when crane is operating under full capacity.
3. Additional forces from wall and self weight of columns should be considered for foundation design.
4. Forces given in the table for wind loads are actual values for 200 kg/m* wind zone without any reduction.
TABLE 215 FOUNDATION FORCES FOR CRANE COLUMN FOOTINGS
12.0 4.5 8.25 5.0 986 1310 - 3240 2676 LO023 11.30 240
7.5 986 1310 -3240 2676 10023 14.63 390
10.0 986 1310 - 3240 2676 10023 18.05 470
20.0 986 1310 -3240 2676 10023. 25.82 780
9.75 5.0 986 1310 - 3240 3151 13880 11.30 240
7.5 986 1310 -3240 3151 13880 14.63 390
10.0 986 i310 - 3240 3151 13880 18.05 470
20.0 986 1310 -3240 3151 13880 25.82 780
6.0 8:25 5.0 1392 1746 - 4320 3569 13363 12.83 270
1.5 1392 1746 - 4320 3569 13363 16.63 440
10.0 1392 1746 -4320 3569 13363 20.45 530
20.0 1392 1746 -4320 3569 13363 30.65 930
9.75 5.0 1392 1746 - 4320 4012 18506 12.83 270
1.5 1392 1746 -4320 4012 18506 16.63 440
10.0 1392 1746 -4320 4012 18506 20.45 530
20.0 1392 1746 -4320 4012 18506 30.65 930
K.rr~-- 1. To obtain wind forces for basic wind pressures of 100 kg/m2 and 150 kg/m2 reduce the wind forces given in the table proportionately.
2. Crane load axial force is the vertical load transmitted by the gantry girder when crane is operating under full capacity.
3. Additional forces from wall and self weight of columns should be considered Forfoundationdesign. (Weight of AC. cladding + girt = 30 kg/m’).
4. Forces given in the table for wind loads are actual values for 200 kg/ mr wind zone without any reduction.
TABLE 216 FOUNDATION FORCES FOR CRANE COLUMN FOOTINGS
SPAN SPACING COLUMN CAPACITY Tttuss LOAD WIND LOAD CRANE LOAD
HEIGHT OF A A A
Nora - 1. To obtain wind forces for basic wmd pressures of 100 kg/m2 and 150 kg/m* reduce the wind forces given in the table proportionately
2. Cra& load axial force is the vertical load transmitted by the gantry girder when crane is operating under full capacity.
3. Additional forces from wall and self weight of columns should be considered for foundation design.
4. Forces given in the table for wind loads are actual values for 200 kg/m* wind zone without any reduction.
-
-~
TABLE 217 FOUNDATION FORCES FOR CRANE COLUMN FOOTINGS
SPAN SPACING COL;lMN C*.PK,Tv TRL~ LOAD WIND LOAD CRANE LOAD
24 4.5 8.25 5.0 2192 2619 - 6480 2676 10023 15.04 200
7.5 2192 2619 - 6480 2676 10023 17.82 320
10.0 2192 2619 - 6480 2676 10023 21.37 390
20.0 2192 2619 - 6480 2616 10023 29.29 680
9.15 5.0 2192 2619 - 6480 3151 13880 15.04 200
7.5 2192 2619 - 6480 3151 13880 17.82 320
10.0 2192 2619 -6480 3151 13880 21.37 390
20.0 2192 2619 - 6480 3151 13880 29.29 680
6.0 - 8.25 5.0 3077 -8640 3569 13363 18.13 240
1.5 3017 3492 -8640 3569 13363 21.46 390
10.0 3017 3492 -8640 3569 13363 25.15 470
20.0 3077 3492 -8640 3569 13363 36.69 850
9.75 5.0 3077 3492 -8640 4012 18506 18.13 240
1.5 3017 3492 -8640 4012 18506 21.46 390
10.0 3017 3492 -8640 4012 18506 25.75 470
20.0 3071 -8640 4012 18506 36.69 850
NOTE - I. To obtain wind forces for basic wind pressures of ‘100 kg/m* and 150 kg/m2 reduce the wind forces given in the table proportionately.
2. Crane load axial force is the vertical load transmitted by the gantry girder when crane is operating under full capacity.
3. Additional forces from wall and self weight of columns should be considered for foundation design. (Weight of A.C. cladding + girts
= 30 kg/m?.
4. Forces given in the table for wind loads are actual values for 200 kg/m2 wind zone without any reduction.
TABLE 218 FOUNDATION FORCES FOR CRANE COLUMN FOOTINGS
SPAN SPACING COLUMN CAPACITY TRIM LOAD WIND LOAD CRANE LOAD
30.0 4.5 8.25 5.0 2878 3273 -8100 2676 10023 15.46 180
7.5 2878 3273 -8100 2616 10023 17.96 290
10.0 2878 3273 -8100 2676 10023 21.79 350
20.0 2878 ,3273 -8100 2676 10023 32.42 680
9.15 5.0 2878 3273 -8100 3151 13880 15.46 180
7.5 2878 3213 -8100 3151 13880 17.96 2&l
10.0 2878 3273 -8100 3151 13880 21.79 350
E 20.0 2878 3273 -8100 3151 13880 32.42 680
6.0 8.25 5.0 4030 4364 - 10800 3569 13363 18.63 210
7.5 4030 4364 - 10800 3569 13363 21.63 350
10.0 4030 4364 - 10800 3569 13363 26.25 420
20.0 4030 4364 - 10800 3569 13363 37.94 790
9.75 5.0 4030 4364 - 10800 4012 18506 18.63 210
7.5 4030 4364 - 10800 4012 18506 21.63 350
10.0 4030 4364 - 10800 4012 18506 26.25 420
20.0 4030 4364 -10800 4012 18506 31.94 790
NOTE- 1. To obtain wind forces for basic wind pressures of 100 kg/m2 and 1.50kg/m2 reduce the wind forces given in the table proportionately.
2. Crane load axial force is the vertical load transmitted by the gantry girder when crane is operating under full capacity.
3. Additional forces from wall and self weight of columns should be considered for foundation design. (Weight of A.C. cladding + girts
= 30 kgjm’).
4. Forces given in the table for wind loads are actual values for 200 kg/ m2 wind zone without any reduction.
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
TUtI&? DETAIL
SPAN 9 I2 18 24 30 No.
(m)
I I I 1 1 RT
6 3.8 3.6,1 3,6,9,14 3.6.9.17 Rl
12 Rlf
4 4 4 4 R2
2 R3
I 10 7.10,13 R4
497 7 R4s
4 6 9 12 I5 RS
8 10 19 R6
13 16 R6f
2 2 2 2 TI
5 5.8 5,8,1 I 58.14 T2
NOTE - For number and size of fasteners to be used in thii connection (see Tables 221 and 222).
TRU.?s DETAIL
SPAN 9 12 15 No.
(m)
I 1 I RT
L6.1 3,6,9,14 3,6,9,17 RI
12 Rlf
4 4 4 R2
7 7,lO 7,10,13 RI
9 12 I5 R5
13 16 19.21 Rl
2 2 2 TI
5.8 5,8,11 5.8.14 T2
II T2f
I2 I5 I8 T4
10 13 16 WI
NOTE- For number and size of fasteners to bc used in this connection (see Tables 221 and 222).
262
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
9.0 4.5 8 8
9.0 6.0 8 8
12.0 4.5 8 8
12.0 6.0 10 10
15.0 4.5 10
15.0 6.0 - IO
18.0 4.5 IO -
18.0 6.0 10 -
24.0 4.5 10 -
24.0 6.0 I2
30.0 4.5 12 -
NoTE--T~~ gusset plate thickness given above can be used for tubular truss also in case jointing is
done through gussets.
,263
TABLE 222 FASTENER DETAILS FOR ANGLE TRUSSES
TRUS MEMBER WELDED GJNKE~TIOV BOLT !%O. OF FITrED ho. OF BLACK SPLICE SPLICE ANGLE DETAILS TACK
SIZE DIA B@TS h WELQING
Size Total f-S,,@le DoubieJ & ANGLE ( Length Effective 3 Spacing
NOTE- I. All shop connections are welded and field connections may be bolted or welded.
2. Fastener requirements shown above are to connect web members to gusset plates and for spiice connections in tie and rafter members whenever
these members are discontinuous.
3. When rafter or tie members continue through the node, provide a nominal 4.5 mm weld over entire gusset length.
4. The length of welds required should be increased by twenty five percent in case of field welding.
5. Refer Fig. 25 for tack welding details.
6. Spacing and edge distance of bolts shall be as per IS 6OO-iO62 (28,2).
7. Fastener details have been worked on total strength of members joined for typification purposes. If further economy required, fasteners details
can be worked out on actual forces in members.
SP : 38(S&T~i987
I 1 1 I I RT
6 3.8 3.6.11 3.6.9.14 3.6.9.17 R1
I2 Rlf
4 4 4 4 R2
l * * l
R3
l * 7 IO 7.10.13 R4
NODE NUMBERS; + 7 R4s
417 l
4 6 9 I2 I5 RS
8 10 13 16 19 R6
* 2 2 2 2 Tl
3 5 5 5,8 5,8,14 T2
8 11 II T2f
7 9 12 I5 I8 T3
5 7 10 13 16 WI
I I I RT
3,6,11 3.6.9.14 3,6,9,17 RI
12 Rlf
4 4 4 R2
NODE NUMBERS 7 7,lO 7,10,13 R4
9 12 15 R5
13 16 19 R-l
2 2 2 I-1
5.8 5.8.11 5.8.14 T2
I1 T2f
12 15 18 T4
IO 13 16 WI
265
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
2OL 6 3 I30
25L 7 3 185
32L 7 3 240
4OL 6 5 180
5OL 6 5 225
65L 7 5 320
8OL 7 6 310
90L 8 6 400
1001. 8 7 385
IOOM 10 7 470
125M IO 8 540
ISOM 10 8 64r
NOTE-The length of welds required shorlld be increased by twenty five percent in case of field welding.
DEPTH OF SHOE ANGLE SECTION COL~~MN CAP PI-ATE SWE ANGLE COLUMN CAP
COLUMN SWTION CONNFCTIOS BOLTS
(mm) (mm) (mm) h
Black Bolts No. of
Dia Bolts
(mm)
NOTE - I. For details of columns not specified above use tne details given for the next higher section in the above table.
2. The length of shoe angle shall be same as length of column cap plate.
3. Refer Fig. 42 for drawing details.
266
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
DEPTH OF SHOE ANGLE SECTION COLUMN CAP PLATE SHOE ANOLE COLUMN CAP
COLUMN SECTION C~NNEI~I~N EoLrs
(mm) (mm) (mm)
Dii Bolts
(mm)
200 2-ISA100100 X 12 220X220X 12 18 8
300 2-ISA100100 X 12 320X270X I2 20 8
400 2-ISA110110 X I5 420X270X 14 22 8
500 2-lSA1101 IO x I5 520 X 270 X 14 22 8
fJO0 2-ISA110110 X I5 620 X 270 X 14 22 8
NOTE- 1. For details of columns not specified above use the details given for the next higher section in the above table.
2. The length of shoe angle shall be same as length of column cap plate.
3. Refer Fig. 43 for drawing details.
-
TYPE DEPTH OF COLUMN SECTIONS(mm) SLAB BASE SIZE (mm)* ANCHOR kJLTS
-
IV 450 450
500 500 800 500 60 36 39
550
V 400
450 700 600 60 45 45
V1 500
550 800 650 60 45 45 6
267
TABLE 229 CRANE COLUMN CAP PLATE DETAILS
DEFTH OF SHOE ANGLE COLUMN CAP PLATE SIZE BLACK BOLT No. OF
CCBLIJMN SECTION DIA BOLTS
(mm) (mm)
SPAN SLoPE SPACING TRUSS CbSSm PURLINS SAGROD TIE TOTAL UNIT
MEMBEp WEIGHT WEIGHT WEIGHT RUNNER WEIGHT WEIGHT
WEIGHT WEIGHT
@I 6-d 0%) (kg) (kg) (kid (kg) (kg) Ml m2)
269
SP :38(5&T)-1987
270
SP : 38(S&T)-1!387
SPAN SLOPE SPACING Twss GUXSET PURLINS SAGROD TIE TOTAL UNIT
MEMBERS WEIGHT WEIGHT WEIGHT RUNNER WEIGHT WElGHl
WEIGHT WEIGHT
(m) Am) (kg) (kg) (kg) (kg) (kg) (kg) (kg/ m2)
271
SP : 3Q(S&T)-1987
272
SP : 3lw&T~1987
SPAN SLOPE SPACING TRUSS GUSSET PURLINS SAGROD TIE TOTAL UNIT
MEMREjtS WEIGHT WEIGHT WEIGHT RUNNER WEIGHT WEIGHT
WEIGHT WEIGHT
Cm) Cm) (kg) (kg) (kg) (kg/ m2)
273
SP :.38(S&T)_1987
274
SP : 38@&T)l987
275
SP : 38(!$&T)-1987
SPAN SLOPE SPACING TRUSS GUSSET PURLINS SAGROD TIE TOTAL UNIT
MEMBERS WEIGHT WEIGHT WEIGHT RUNNER WEIGHT WEIGHT
WEIGHT
(m) (N (kg) (kg) (k8) (kg) (kg) (kg) (kg/m*)
276
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
277
SP : 38(S&T)-1987
278
ELEm,(ON of SIOE GIRTS ALONG KWS’A’ 6 ‘8’ I Iow I ,000 !
I
LIST Cf MARKS
y
DETAIL OF TRUSS
GENERAL NOTES 1
_ I I I
t
!-
VIEW
OF
DETAIL
I
13-G
V’EW
LICENSED TO LANCO INFRATECH LIMITED, UDUOG VIHAR, GURGAON,
FOR INTERNAL USE AT THIS LOCATION ONLY -t A.
m
.,.*, .. . . _.”
+--
!.I
+
-_
3.
>
I
I
.
/’
t
Cl -M&RUNNER REOD. MKCI. R -1 AS
.Y *NOS. RUNNER REM. L(KC). R-h OPI
2~05. RUNNER REOD. MKD. R-2 A5 DRN.t NOTED.
Z-MS. RUNNER REOD. MKCI. R-2x DPP.HAND To R-2
Z.NOS. EACH COWMN BRACIYG REOD. MKD CB-I. CB.2. CB-3 4 CB-LA AS DRN. 4-NDS.EACH GABLE END BRACING I?EOD.MKO. GCB-l,GCB-2 1 ltCB_)
_ ___ ~~
PNOS. RUNNER REOD. MKD. R-13 A5 WN.
--AS IDRN.
12-tXJS.a)LUMN BRACING REODI. MKD. CB -L AS DRNc 2 m. GABLE EH) BRACING RnT). MKD.GC:B - 4
.-_“Yna
SECTlffl 2- 2
VlEW L-4
“““ws$@
‘IB-M5.Sffi KC REKLMKD. §R-5 AS DAN. DETAIL OF COLUMIN BRACIffi
6 UDE GIRTS.
FOR INTERNAL USE AT THIS LOCATION ONLY
LICENSED TO LANCO INFRATECH LIMITED, UDUOG VIHAR, GURGAON,
c
II il
II WCS;
II
Ii .L 4..-
l-l
II
II .- _-
^____.“_
.._““__
,._^”
““.
_.._
_I
. ..m
I”C
__
I”..L
._.
“I
_
I~~IIb.,,“”
..___
I 3-NC5 RRLY
2-NOS. I.
REPD.
..
GLi P-2 A5 ON. _ ,a .. *
1 DETAIL OF
6
ROOF
PURLINS
BRACINGS
_ .“_. ,_-- ,_. I_ n=..h -mu. rn-, p3 l_miY. 1 , ,__. _“. ,._” ,._. ,.,.. _.
I