Design, Codes and Guidelines: 10.1 Overview
Design, Codes and Guidelines: 10.1 Overview
Design, Codes and Guidelines: 10.1 Overview
1 Overview 79
10.2 Design
Due to a lack of widely accepted design procedures in the following only a few spe-
cific aspects of FRP are drawn attention to:
Structural Safety
Due to possible stress rupture one has to distinguish between short-term and long-
term structural safety, especially in the use of glass fibres whose long-term strength is
only about 25-30% of the short-term strength (cf. tab. 3.4). The problem is lessened
by the relatively low Young’s modulus of glass fibres, due to which usually the service-
ability at a relatively low stress level is decisive (e.g. in the case of profiles or FRP
decks). However, special attention regarding stress rupture must be given to the use of
glass fibres in prestressing systems or as untensioned reinforcement in the case of
crack formation in concrete.
Ductility
FRP materials behave linear-elastically up to failure. The properties considered under
ductility -possible redistribution of sectional forces as well as a forewarning of prob-
lems of structural safety due to large deformations - are usually not (carbon and ara-
mid fibres) or only partially (glass fibres) present. In the case of glass fibres one often
(falsely) speaks of ductile behaviour, since the deformations due to the relatively low
Young’s modulus from the serviceability state up to failure can easily increase by a
factor 10 to 20. The behaviour however remains linear-elastic.
Different strategies have been developed to obtain a nearly ductile behaviour:
- Hybrid fibre arrangements: mixture of carbon fibres with smaller and glass fibres
with greater failure strain (e.g. roughly 20% carbon and 80% glass fibres). At the fail-
ure of the carbon fibres the forces are transferred to the glass fibres, accompanied
80 10 Design, Codes and Guidelines
Anisotropy
The excellent properties of FRP materials only exist in the direction of the fibres.
Transverse to the fibres the properties of the weak matrix are governing. Depending
on the type of loading this can be both advantageous or disadvantageous: For a
constant loading direction the fibres are laid in the direction of the loading and are
fully utilised. In the case of a changing direction of loading, however, the anisotropy
is a disadvantage. The required quasi-isotropic fibre architectures exhibit consider-
ably reduced strength and stiffness (cf. fig. 3.8).
The anisotropy acts negatively mostly in two specific situations: in the region of connec-
tions and where forces are introduced with, for the most part, changing loading directions
as well as with shear action. Shear strengths and stiffnesses are usually small, so that in
particular shear deformations cannot be neglected (in contrast to traditional materials).
Self-weight
The low self-weight of FRP materials offers big advantages during installation and
above all in the case of deck replacement. Although the materials exhibit good dam-
ping behaviour, one still has to pay close attention to vibration behaviour.
Interim Guidance of the Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures Using Fibre Com-
posite Reinforcement.
Institution of Structural Engineers, London, 1999 (Eurocrete, not compulsory).
Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code, Section 16: Fibre Reinforced Structures.
(Final Draft). Ministry of Transportation, Canada, 1996 (compulsory).
Design and Construction Guidelines for Prestressed Concrete Highway Bridges Using
FRP Tendons.
PWRI, Tsukuba City, Japan, March 1994 (compulsory).