Wins Core Indicators and Questions 4 Pager
Wins Core Indicators and Questions 4 Pager
Wins Core Indicators and Questions 4 Pager
The WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation (JMP) has convened a series
of working groups to review questions and indicators for monitoring water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) in
schools. This document summarizes the resulting harmonized core indicators and questions for monitoring the
WASH in schools elements in Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Targets 4.a, 6.1 and 6.2. A longer set of
expanded questions is also available which addresses aspects of service not covered in this core set. 1
Core indicators
Three core indicators define “basic” water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) in schools. Further definitions are
provided in the associated core question notes.
1. Proportion of schools with basic drinking water
Definition: Proportion of schools (including pre-primary, primary and secondary) with drinking water from an
improved source available at the school
2. Proportion of schools with single-sex basic sanitation
Definition: Proportion of schools (including pre-primary, primary and secondary) with improved sanitation
facilities at the school, which are single-sex and usable
3. Proportion of schools with basic handwashing
Definition: Proportion of schools (including pre-primary, primary and secondary) with handwashing facilities,
which have soap and water available
JMP service ladders
Similar to JMP monitoring of household WASH, the multi-level service ladders for monitoring WASH in schools
enable countries at different stages of development to track and compare progress in reaching basic service.
For countries where “basic” service is not an aspirational aim, an additional “advanced” service level is
suggested, with specific criteria to be defined at national level.
1
For more information, see the expert group meeting report (www.goo.gl/DGCX83) and forthcoming guidance manual for
monitoring WASH in schools in the SDGs.
1
Recommended Core Questions
The following core questions are sufficient to generate data for the core indicators. These are the minimum
needed to monitor WASH in schools as part of the SDGs. They are based on applicable standards and relevant
questions from existing survey instruments. Questions should be suitable for use in self-administered
questionnaires and facility surveys; alternatives for some questions are provided to suit both formats.
W1. What is the main source of Note
drinking water provided by the school? If there is more than one source, the one used most frequently for drinking
(check one - most frequently used) water should be selected. If children need to bring water from home because
Piped water supply water is not provided by the school, “no water source” should be selected.
Response options should be modified to reflect the local context and
Protected well/spring terminology such that respondents are able to clearly understand each one,
Rainwater and they are able to be categorized as improved, unimproved or no water
source. Photos may be useful, where feasible. An “improved” drinking water
Unprotected well/spring source is one that, by the nature of its construction adequately protects the
Packaged bottled water source from outside contamination, particularly faecal matter (JMP
definitionError! Bookmark not defined.). “Improved” water sources in school
Tanker-truck or cart settings include: piped, protected well/spring (including boreholes/tubewells,
Surface water (lake, river, stream) protected dug wells and protected springs), rainwater catchment, and bottled
water. “Unimproved” sources include: unprotected well/spring, tanker-trucks,
No water source and surface water (e.g. lake, river, stream, pond).
If interested in monitoring whether or not children bring drinking water from
home as an interim step to water provision at schools, an additional option,
“children bring water from home” could be added. This will be considered as
“no water source” for the purpose of global monitoring.
2
S1. What type of student Note
toilets/latrines are at the school? If more than one type is used, the most common type of student toilet/latrine
(check one - most common) should be selected.
Flush / Pour-flush toilets Response options should be modified to reflect the local context and
terminology such that responses are able to be categorized by improved,
Pit latrines with slab unimproved or none. Photos may be useful, where feasible.Error! Bookmark
Composting toilets not defined. An “improved” sanitation facility is one that hygienically separates
human excreta from human contact (JMP definitionError! Bookmark not
Pit latrines without slab defined.). “Improved” facilities in school settings include: flush/pour-flush
Hanging latrines toilets, pit latrines with slab, and composting toilets. “Unimproved” facilities
include: pit latrines without slab, hanging latrines, and bucket latrines, or any
Bucket latrines other facility where human excreta is not separated from human contact.
No toilets or latrines
3
H1. Are there handwashing facilities at Note
the school? A handwashing facility is any device or infrastructure that enables students to
Yes wash their hands effectively using running water, such as a sink with tap, water
tank with tap, bucket with tap, tippy tap, or other similar device. A shared
No bucket used for dipping hands is not considered an effective handwashing
facility.