The Concept of Sustainability
The Concept of Sustainability
The Concept of Sustainability
Lynton K. Caldwell"
Although expressed in different ways, the goal of sustainability has most often
been the physical preservation of human societies and their cultures, institutions, social
orders and regimes. Cultural factors psychological, behavioral, and institutional have
influenced the ways in which humans understand and implement their economic and
environmental affairs and the need for sanative sustainable goals and practices. In the
modern world (e.g. since AD 1600) science has been a powerful cognitive influence on
perceptions of the environment. The consequences have been contradictory. Science
perceived as a servant and generator of technological innovation has led to notable
improvements in human life, but has also strongly reinforced the concept of "conquest
of nature", which too often has resulted in degradation of the natural environment
through exploitation by misapplied technologies. Science perceived as teacher opens the
way to understanding how the world of nature works, but has been less successful in
explaining human behavior. The sustainability of human society in the future depends
upon the ability and willingness of humans to order their behavior and institutions toward
maintaining ecological integrity in human relationships with earth. To this end, an
informed and rational concept of sustainability needs to be internalized in the ethos and
ethics of human society and applied critically to concepts of growth, development, and
the environment.
Ambiguity of the term "sustainability" allows for numerous and differing
interpretations. (Brown, et al. 1987). Without an understanding of its several meanings,
their differences and implications, the word risks becoming vacuous. During the latter
years of the twentieth century the concept of sustainability has been linked to another
ambiguous term- "development". What development means is best defined by what is
done in its name. Most often "development" in the socio-political context, implies
economic growth. Although there are attributions to physiological, cultural or ethical
"development- the term most frequently implies "growth" - another concept of many
meanings, e.g., material, qualitative, economic, exponential, intellectual, cyclical, self-
renewing, malignant, experiential. In-so-far as development implies - even requires -
some form or forms of continuing growth, the concept of sustainability becomes relevant.
For example if socio-ecological growth depends upon continuous functioning of the life
supporting systems of the natural environment- air, water, soil, and living organisms-
then the concepts of growth and development require the modifier of sustainability. But
where the relevant parameters of life on earth are finite, not all forms of growth are
indefinitely sustainable.
In the absence of realistic achievable goals, the concept of sustainability offers
the prospect of a continuing expansion of present economic and technological systems
without serious regard to ultimate limitations, to the quality of life, or to the costs of
maintenance. The World Commission on Environment and Development ( 1987) declared
"a sustainable society to be one that meets the needs of the present without compromising
the ability of future generations to meet their own needs." But who defines needs?
Donella Meadows (1992) defines "a sustainable society as one that can persist over
generations, one that is far-seeing enough, flexible enough, and wise enough not to
undermine either its physical or its social systems of support." But there appears to be
a conceptual problem following from these definitions. Each conceptualizes a sustainable
society as having the characteristics of a steady or homeostatic state. Yet each definition
implies and would seem to require a degree of foresight, coherence, and steadiness that
is not generally characteristic of advanced developing societies today. Can modern
society become sustainable?
1. Problems of Definition