ME 425 (PPD) Syllabus-First Sem 2021-2022-Final
ME 425 (PPD) Syllabus-First Sem 2021-2022-Final
ME 425 (PPD) Syllabus-First Sem 2021-2022-Final
VISION A premier national university that develops leaders in the global knowledge economy.
MISSION A university committed to producing leaders by providing a 21st century learning environment through
innovations in education, multidisciplinary research, and community and industry partnerships in order to
nurture the spirit of nationhood, propel the national economy, and engage the world for sustainable
development.
Course Title Power Plant Design with Renewable Energy Course Code ME 425
Course Category Professional Course Prerequisite(s) Fluid Machinery,
Combustion Engineering
Intended Learning ILO Upon completion of this course, the students should be able to:
Outcomes (ILO) ILO1 Discuss the process design development and general design considerations for power plant.
ILO2 Identify the different types of power plants and explain the processes involved.
ILO3 Conduct technical analysis of the different components of a power plant.
ILO4 Conduct economic analysis by determining the appropriate economic indicators.
ILO5 Apply the principles of material and energy balances, and other thermodynamic concepts and
develop a complete design of the power plant.
ILO6 Demonstrate learning through solution of open-ended power plant design problems and come up
with a complete power plant design as casptone design project.
ILO7
Assessment Method Assessment Tasks (AT) Distribution Intended Learning Outcomes Domains
and Distribution Code Assessment Tasks I/R/D (%) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 C P A
Map PS/DE Problem Sets/Design 15 50 50 100
Exercises R
2 Thermal Power Plant, 1st Edition, Design and Operation by Dipak Sarkar, 2015
Other Books and 3 Standard Handbook of Powerplant Engineering 2nd Edition
Articles by Thomas Elliott (Author), Kao Chen (Author), Robert Swanekamp (Author)
4 Power Plant Engineering by Lawrence F. Drbal, Patricia G. Boston, Kayla L. Westra, Black &
Veatch - Technology & Engineering, 1996
5 Power Plant Engineering by P. K. Nag, Tata McGraw-Hill Education, 2002
6
7
8
Institutional IGA Institutional Graduate Attributes (IGA) Statements
Graduate Attributes IGA1 Knowledge Competence
(IGA) Demonstrate a mastery of the fundamental knowledge and skills required for functioning
effectively as a professional in the discipline, and an ability to integrate and apply them effectively
to practice in the workplace.
IGA2 Creativity and Innovation
Experiment with new approaches, challenge existing knowledge boundaries and design novel
solutions to solve problems.
IGA3 Critical and Systems
Identify, define, and deal with complex problems pertinent to the future professional practice or
daily life through logical, analytical and critical thinking.
IGA4 Communication
Communicate effectively (both orally and in writing) with a wide range of audiences, across a
range of professional and personal contexts, in English and Pilipino.
IGA5 Lifelong Learning
Identify own learning needs for professional or personal development; demonstrate an eagerness to
take up opportunities for learning new things as well as the ability to learn effectively on their own.
CDIO2
Analytical reasoning and problem solving; experimentation , investigation and knowledge
discovery; system thinking; attitudes, thoughts and learning; ethics, equity and other
responsibilities
CDIO3 Interpersonal Skills: Teamwork & Communication
Teamwork, communications, communication in a foreign language
CDIO4 Conceiving, Designing, Implementing & Operating Systems
External, societal and environmental context, enterprise and business context, conceiving, systems
engineering and management, designing, implementing, operating
Sustainable SDG SDG Skills
Development Goals SDG1 Envisioning
Skills Establish a link between long-term goals and and immediate actions, and motivate people to take
action by harnessing their deep aspirations.
SDG2 Critical Thinking and Reflection
Examine economic, environmental, social and cultural structures in the context of sustainable
development, and challenges people to examine and question the underlying assumptions that
influence their world views by having them reflect on unsustainable practices.
SDG3 Systemic Thinking
Recognise that the whole is more than the sum of its parts, and it is a better way to understand and
manage complex situations.
SDG4 Building Partnerships
Promote dialogue and negotiation, learning to work together, so as to strengthen ownership of and
commitment to sustainable action through education and learning.
SDG5 Participation in Decision Making
Empower oneself and others through involvement in joint analysis, planning and control of local
decisions.
COURSE POLICIES
A. GRADING SYSTEM
The grading system adopted by this course is as follows:
Excellent 1 98 - 100
Superior 1.25 94 - 97
Very Good 1.5 90 - 93
Good 1.75 88 - 89
Meritorious 2 85 - 87
Very Satisfactory 2.25 83 - 84
Satisfactory 2.5 80 - 82
Fairly Satisfactory 2.75 78 - 79
Passing 3 75 - 77
Failure 5 Below 70
Incomplete INC
*Students who got a computed grade of 70-74 will be given an appropriate remedial activity in which the final grade
should be either passing (3.0) or failure (5.0).
B. CLASS POLICY
Prompt and regular attendance of students is required. Total unexcused absences shall not exceed ten (10) percent of the
maximum number of hours required per course per semester (or per summer term). A semester has 18 weeks.
MISSED EXAMINATIONS
Students who failed to take the exam during the schedule date can be given a special exam provided he/she has valid
reason. If it is health reason, he/she should provide the faculty with the medical certificate signed by the attending
Physician. Other reasons shall be assessed first by the faculty to determine its validity.
ACADEMIC DISHONESTY
Academic dishonesty includes acts such as cheating during examinations or plagiarism in connection with any academic
work. Such acts are considered major offenses and will be dealt with according to the University’s Student Norms of
Conduct.
DROPPING
Dropping must be made official by accomplishing a dropping form and submitting it at the Registrar’s Office before the
midterm examination. Students who officially drop out of class shall be marked “Dropped” whether he took the
preliminary examination or not and irrespective of their preliminary grades.
A student who unofficially drops out of class shall be given a mark of “5.0” by the instructor.
C. OTHER COURSE POLICIES AND REQUIREMENTS
Reading List:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/p
ower-generation-system
2 2. The variable load problem Analyze variable load problem
and its implication to power
2.1 Elements of electric power system generating systems Discussion,
2.2 The load duration curve and plant selection Sample Problems
2.3 Effect of variable load on power plant design Analysis and
2.4 Effect of variable load on power plant operation Group Activity
2, 3 1 1
2.5 Methods of meeting the load
demand/requirements
Reading List:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/st
eam-power-plant
Assessment # 3: Problem Sets/Design Exercises Apply the mass and energy Problem solving
balance in solving steam power
15 cycles and its thermodynamic 6 1
improvements.
Discussion,
9 17 2,3 1 Sample Problems
Analysis,
Evaluate the performance of
alternative energy soruces
8.1 Energy storage technologies
8.2 Geothermal power plant
8.3 Hydro power plant
8.4 Solar thermal energy Discussion,
9 8.5 Wind energy 17 2,3 1 Sample Problems
8.6 Ocean thermal energy conversion Analysis,
8.7 Fuel conversion technology
Problem Set/Design x
Exercises
Midterm Exam x
Capstone Design x
Project
Final Exam x
1 2 3 4 5 C P A
ILO1 PS/DE PS/DE
Mapping
ILO2 ME ME
ILO3 ME PS/DE
ILO4 CDP CDP
ILO5 CDP PS, FE
ILO6 CDP FE CDP FE
ILO7
ILO1 PS/DE
ILO2 ME
ILO3 PS/DE
ILO4 CDP
ILO5 FE
ILO6 CDP FE
ILO7
ILOs 1 2 3 2
ILO1 PS/DE
Mapping
ILO2 ME
ILO3 PS/DE
ILO4 CDP
ILO5 FE
Mapping
ILO-CDIO and I ILO6 CDP CDP
ILO7
Remarks:
1 The syllabus is to be distributed to the students in the first week of the semester.
2 Any changes to the syllabus shall be communicated (in writing) to the Program Chair and the approved revised version
must be communicated to the students.
3 The course instructor may set a more stringent similarity percentage (maximum 30%) for their respective courses
pertaining to student's submissions. However, it must be communicated in writing to the respective Program Chair and the
approved revised version must be communicated to the students.