Writing A Case Study
Writing A Case Study
Writing A Case Study
A case study is a conscious retelling of an experience which may be presented to a group for
analysis and evaluation. The experience ought to be an event for which you have some
responsibility for the outcome. The case study must be as brief as possible, one to two pages,
double spaced. Please carefully select an event, critical incident or conversation which when
brought to class will be real to you.
CASE STUDY APPROACH
I. BACKGROUND: Setting the event in context: Where? Include important context
information. Who was involved – personal? Pressures? How and why were you
involved?
II. DESCRIPTIONS: A problem may be stated at the outset. What happened? What
did you do? Include essential facts, neither more nor less than needed. Include as
much detail as possible in the limited space. Accurately reflect the situation. A
verbatim may help. A verbatim is taking a portion of the event and writing exactly
who said what; including body language, facial expressions, pauses, and other
information which relays the emotion and clarifies the meaning of what is being –
and not being – said. (See verbatim section below for further details.)
III. ANALYSIS: Identify the issues and relationships that were apparent as you
viewed the situation. What was happening? Are these issues apparent in your
written version of the situation? Who were you as minister and leader? How was
God evident or absent?
IV. EVALUATION: Estimate your own effectiveness in the event. Did you function
effectively? Why? Why not? Did you do what you set out to do? What factors or
forces emerged which you did not anticipate? What questions might the group
discuss that would be most helpful to you?
SAMPLE “B”
BACKGROUND: As in most denominations presently there is a great amount of tension
arising from different understandings of the nature and mission of the church. Within our
denomination there is a divisive group, composed mainly of lay (people) who have been
circularizing the church and seeking to sow seeds of ill will and dissension, particularly in
setting lay (people) over against the ministers. I heard of an organization meeting of this
group in our city and decided to attend the meeting even though it was really intended for lay
(people) only. Five of the members of our church were there. It upset me greatly that this
divisive group might get a foothold in this church. In the weeks that followed all the officers
received information through the mail from this group, with attacks and insinuations about
the subversion of the church. I determined that I would have to do something about this
meeting of the officers.
EVENT: I chose to speak on this at the next monthly meeting of one of the boards. During
the meeting some of the (people) made charges about the denomination which had obviously
come from this dissident group. They alluded to the stand on social issues, control of church
property, and the lack of value of the church magazine. Much to my surprise, some of the
(people) who support the church wholeheartedly were mute that evening. I felt very much
alone as I tried to answer some of these unfounded attacks. At the end of the meeting it was
customary for me to speak to the group about any matter that concerned me. I talked about
this dissident group and their insinuations about the leadership of the church. I maintained
that such a group in the church was more of a problem than a solution, and stated that if we
were more faithful in seeking guidance from God’s Word we would have a better and more
effective church. Finally I told them that I disagreed with them and disapproved of this group,
and it was my responsibility as their pastor to tell them how I felt.
ANALYSIS: I am sure that my speech alienated some of the (people) at the meeting, at least
for a time. I was really very threatened by the discussion that had taken place, and even
though my personal security in the church was not threatened I took it very personally. I was
very defensive, and later realized that I had manipulated them emotionally at the very time
that I was denying any manipulation. My advice about more use of the Word of God was a
smoke screen, because I had not used the Bible in the meeting any more than they.
EVALUATION: I was not very effective in combating the attitudes of some of those officers
because of my defensiveness. I do feel that I had to take some stand for the sake of those who
did not understand it. The one good thing that emerged was that they expressed gratitude that
I told them how I felt, even though they may have disagreed. I need to learn how to deal more
effectively with hostility and opposition. How might I have handled the problem more
effectively?
-------
Case studies taken from Putting It Together in the Parish, by James D. Glasse (Nashville:
Abington, 1972), pp. 79-83.
file:///D:/Downloads/case-study-and-theological-reflection-guidelines.pdf