Pham Duo NG 2018
Pham Duo NG 2018
Pham Duo NG 2018
Introduction: Localized aggressive periodontal disease is an uncommon finding observed in adolescents and
children. Studies have been conducted to elucidate the etiology, contributing factors, and genetic roles in the phenomena.
In particular, twin studies have shown genetic makeup to be a substantial risk factor for periodontitis. This case is, to
the best of the authors’ knowledge, the first to be presented in literature of a same dwelling, set of monozygotic twins,
displaying similar presentation of localized aggressive periodontitis, however with different microbial profiles.
Case Presentation: A set of 17-year-old black male monozygous twins were referred for a full-mouth periodontal
evaluation and any necessary periodontal treatment on July 7, 2007. a complete mouth radiographic series, periodontal
charting, and intraoral photographs were performed on each individual. A family history was obtained through the biological
mother, which yielded no known history of early tooth loss or treatment of severe periodontal disease. The father was not
involved in the rearing of the children and his periodontal history was unavailable. An initial and surgical treatment plan
was developed. Microbial analysis of subgingival plaque samples was collected on the affected sites. Initial treatment with
scaling and root planing, subgingival irrigation, with administration of systemic antibiotics, and oral hygiene instruction,
were rendered on both individuals.
Conclusion: Within limitations of this report, it is demonstrated that different microbial pattern exists on aggressive
periodontitis even in genetically identical individuals with the same environmental exposure. Clin Adv Periodontics
2018;0:1–6.
Key Words: Aggressive periodontitis; genetics; gingival crevicular fluid; microbiology; alveolar bone loss; twin studies.
Discussion
The benefit of doing a twin
study is that within the
same environment, they share
most relevant oral habits and
practices. “Thus the similarity
FIGURE 3 Posterior periapical radiographs of patient TH (3A through 3H). of such factors as personal
habits, lifestyles, and access to
health care should not be differ-
ent (on average) for members
of twin pairs whether they
are monozygous or dizygous.”6
Schenkein reported in mono-
zygous twins, the difference
in attachment loss is only due
to environment.6 However,
even in the same environment,
our study patients exhibited
different microbial make up yet
FIGURE 4 Posterior periapical radiographs of patient SH (4A through 4H). similar clinical presentations.
2 Clinical Advances in Periodontics, Vol. 0, No. 0, xxx 2018 Localized Aggressive Periodontitis in Twins
C A S E R E P O R T
4 Clinical Advances in Periodontics, Vol. 0, No. 0, xxx 2018 Localized Aggressive Periodontitis in Twins
C A S E R E P O R T
TH SH
Putative Presumptive Periodontal % Cultivable Microbiota % Cultivable Microbiota
Pathogen Identification from culture from culture
A. actinomycetemcomitans 0 0
P. gingivalis 0 3.8
P. intermedia 6.2 0
T. forsythia 3.8 3.8
Campylobacter sp. 4.6 5.4
Eubacterium sp. 0 0
Fusobacterium sp. 5.4 4.6
P. micros 3.8 0
Enteric Gram-negative rods 0 0
Beta hemolytic streptococci 0 0
Yeast 0 0
Eikenella corrodens 0 0
Staphylococcus sp. 0 0
D. pneumosintes 3.8 0
Maxilla
Second molar (#2) Yes Yes
First molar (#3) Yes - Mesial Yes - Distal and Mesial
Mandible
Second molar (#18) No No
First molar (#19) Yes - Distal Yes - Mesial
First molar (#30) Yes - Mesial Yes - Mesial
Second molar (#31) No No
To assist in gathering diagnostic information for treat- Health (NIH)-supported microbiome project to identify
ing active periodontal disease, microbiological sampling all major microorganisms in the oral cavity to estab-
of the gingival crevicular fluid found in the periodontal lish a database of microorganisms that can be used
pocket may be performed.7 This often can yield infor- to study specific oral disease processes and infections.9
mation on predominant microbiota and assist in proper An interesting finding in the present study was regard-
choice of antimicrobial therapy. Also, the information ing the presence of different bacterial species within
can be used as predictors of clinical outcome.7 Aggre- monozygotic twins with same environmental condi-
gatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (Aa) is very strongly tions. Both patients shared common periodontopathogens
associated with localized aggressive periodontitis in both such as Tannerella forsythia, Campylobacter species
prevalence and abundance.2 However, Aa was not found and Fusobacterium. However, one patient had Porphy-
in either of our patients in an environment like the romonas gingivalis and the other did not. P. gingi-
oral cavity, it is not one specific organism from a valis has been associated with aggressive periodontitis
pure culture that contributes to a disease or infection in other populations.10 One patient had Prevotella inter-
but that of the community of bacteria inhabiting a media, Peptostreptococcus micros, and Dialister pneu-
biofilm that populates any one surface of the body.8 mosintes whereas the other patient did not (Table 1).
It has been thus the goal of the National Institutes of Both patients had all four first molar involvement with
severe attachment loss (Figs. 1 and 2; Table 2). Somatic is, epigenetic phenomena result in different expressions
mosaicism may explain for the differences in the sus- of identical genes between a pair of monozygous twins,
ceptibility of one individual for a certain profile of peri- even in genes having the same compositions and DNA
odontopathogens or possibly the effect of slightly vari- nucleotides.”15 Longitudinal evaluation of monozygous
able environmental factors.11,12 Differences in bacterial twin subjects could lead us to important understanding
composition did not seem to be associated with clinical of the role of these bacteria in the initiation and progres-
periodontal breakdown manifestation (Tables 1 and 2). sion oflocalized aggressive periodontitis and its treatment.
Bacterial causation alone cannot explain the symmetri-
cal and site-specific location of breakdown. Within this
concept of genetically and/or environmentally susceptible
Conclusions
individuals being affected, infectious agents such as vari-
With future advanced molecular techniques to elucidate
ous herpesviruses have been associated with severe types
of periodontal disease. 13 Further, herpesviruses in aggres- the relationship between specific microbiomes to differ-
ent presentations of periodontal disease, a clearer picture
sive periodontitis lesions have been shown to possibly play
of disease progression and behavior can be developed.
a role in disease development. The herpesviral–bacterial
role of periodontitis hypothesizes that herpesvirus initi- Also, techniques to perform in-depth viral analysis and to
evaluate epigenetic changes in host responses to periodon-
ates the disease and allows for opportunistic periodon-
topathogens may help to explain the complex etiology of
topathogen colonization.13 Another possible explanation
for the differences is by epigenetic modifications.14 “That aggressive periodontitis.
Summary
Why is this case new To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first report on the
information? nature of microbial analysis of genetically identical twins with localized
aggressive periodontitis
What are the keys to successful Microbial sampling to differentiate bacterial challenges along with
management of this case? patient’s full compliance and motivation
What are the primary limitations Long-term follow-up was not available due to patients’ non-compliance
to success in this case? There are no studies on different microbes and the pattern of disease
progression in twin studies with aggressive periodontitis
6 Clinical Advances in Periodontics, Vol. 0, No. 0, xxx 2018 Localized Aggressive Periodontitis in Twins