LIT First Quarter Reviewer
LIT First Quarter Reviewer
LIT First Quarter Reviewer
First Quarter
I. Introduction to Literature
a. Literature
i. Etymology: litteratura (Latin) meaning “writing formed with letters”
ii. A body of written works (poetry, novels, essays, etc.) (Britannica)
iii. Works of imagination characterized by excellence of style and expression and by themes of
general or enduring interest (The Free Dictionary)
iv. Body of written works of a particular culture or people (The Free Dictionary)
v. Considered to be very good and have lasting importance (Merriam-Webster)
vi. Literature VS literature: Literature pertains to a work with high standards & characteristics
which has something to do with culture and society.
b. It all started with oral tradition. (i.e. Storytelling of folklores, fables, epics, etc.)
PROSE POETRY
Form Written in paragraph form Written in stanza or verse
Language Expressed in ordinary form Expressed in figurative
Appeal To the intellect To the emotion
Aim To convince Stir the imagination
b. Figures of Speech
i. Simile – comparison of dissimilar elements using “like” or “as”
ii. Metaphor – comparison of dissimilar elements without using “like” or “as”
iii. Personification – giving human qualities to nonliving things
iv. Hyperbole – uses exaggeration for emphasis or effect
v. Irony – using words where the meaning is the opposite of their usual meaning
©briebichara2016
vi. Litotes (Understatement) – when something is said to make something appear less
important or less serious
vii.Euphemism – a word or phrase that replaces a word or a phrase to make it more polite or
pleasant
viii.Onomatopoeia – a word that sounds like what it is
©briebichara2016
c. Specialization leads to a lack of social understanding and to the division of human beings.
Awareness of the existence of a bigger world creates the feeling of generality, the feeling of
belonging that binds society together and prevents it from disintegrating into a myriad of solipsistic
particularities.
i. Don’t battle for superiority, battle for harmony.
d. Reasons why Literature is Important
i. Helps maintain peace among people.
ii. Enhances our ability to express ourselves.
iii. Reading is a vital component for the critical mind.
1. Without it, we’d be satisfied with injustice and false truths.
e. Literature is a unifying factor and helps us all remember that we come of common origin and have
the same goals. How?
i. Topics are not limited
ii. Learn about different cultures and generation
iii. Anyone and everyone can relate.
f. Life without literature.
i. Since literature widens our vocabulary & expands our minds, without it, we’d be stupid
ii. Without literature, we’d lack intellect and imagination.
iii. Since reading is essential to critical thinking, without it we’d be idiots.
iv. We would resemble a community of deaf mutes because our means of communication would
be poor thus we won’t get to express ourselves.
v. Our civilization would waste away.
1. Few words.
2. A lot of adjectives wouldn’t exist.
3. We won’t go to identify the things that are acceptable and unacceptable in society.
4. Our minds wouldn’t be open to certain aspects of our conditions in life. We’d be blind
to the terrible things.
5. Our ideals wouldn’t be as they are right now.
g. Although it is highly improbable that life would be devoid of literature, just in case, we should act on it
– READ.
b. Traditional
i. Moral / Intellectual
1. Definition:
a. Concerned with content and values
b. Focuses not only to discover meaning but also to determine whether works of
literature are both true and significant
c. Answers: What’s the lesson?
2. Pioneered the idea: Plato, Aristotle (Paz Latorena)
a. Plato: Didactic purpose of literature – to give instruction (main purpose of lit is
to teach) hates artists because they give us a false notion of the real world
b. Aristotle: principles of dramatic construction (purpose of lit is to give delight /
entertainment)
©briebichara2016
i. Most important principle: Catharsis – purgation of pity and fear on the
reader and audience after reading
c. Horace: both teaches and delights
3. Questions:
a. What knowledge/impression does the work contain?
i. Knowledge / impression = ideas
b. How strongly does the work deliver its knowledge/impression?
i. Work = text
c. How may the knowledge/impression lifted from the work be evaluated
morally?
i. Morally = subjective
d. How may the knowledge/impression derived from the work be assessed
intellectually?
ii. Topic / Historical
1. AKA Biographical
2. Definition:
a. Stresses the relationship of literature to its historical period (Text and
medium)
b. Reflects the intellectual worlds of the authors (Text and author)
c. Use or Language / Focus on Form and Structure/ How it was written not WHAT
i. Formalism - not only confined in literary context but also in other forms of art (painting)
1. Russian Formalism
a. Definition: “… Literature distinguished itself non-literary language because it
employs a whole range of devices that have defamiliarizing effect (Bertens,
2008)
i. Try to distinguish literary piece from other works through the use of
language – poetic / literary language
ii. Whole range of devices – poetic or sound devices specifically
metaphor, metonymy (although it may also come in the form of rhyme
schemes in poetry)
iii. Defamiliarization – Poetic or literary language could disturb
‘habitualization’ and make us see things differently and anew. This is
achieved by the ability of poetic or literary language to ‘make strange’
or defamiliarize the familiar world; what changed in the world was not
the world or object in question but the way of perceiving it: the mode
of perception.
b. They do away with the morals. Focuses on the structure of the text
c. Main Features:
i. Defamiliarization (Viktor Shklovsky)
ii. Dialogic (Bakhtin and Volosinov)
iii. Metaphor and metonymy (Jakobson)
d. Questions:
i. How is the work structured or organized? How does it begin? Where
does it go next? How does it end? What is the work’s plot? How is its
plot related to its structure?
1. plot – sequence of events
2. structure – poem: free verse or rhymes
ii. Who is narrating or telling what happens in the work? How is the
narrator, speaker, or character revealed to readers? How do we come
to know and understand this figure?
©briebichara2016
iii. What is the relationship of each part of the work to the work as a
whole? How are the parts related to one another?
iv. What are the time and place of the work – its setting? How is the
setting related to what we know of the characters and their actions?
To what extent is the setting symbolic?
v. What kind of language does the author use to describe, narrate,
explain or otherwise create the world of literary work? More
specifically, what images, similes, metaphors, symbols appear in the
work? What is their function? What meanings do they convey?
(DiYanni, 1562)
1. Describe – use of senses
2. Narrate – sequential
3. Explain –
4. Imagery – visual representation of what is in the poem
2. American Formalism (New Criticism)
a. Definition: “… Concerned with the literary artefact and its form rather than
with the artist it historical context (Webster, 1996)
i. artefact = text (more sophisticated term)
1. Text and setting where it was written (medium)
2. Text and author (who wrote it)
3. Text as the enemy itself (not affected by external factors,
analyze as it is)
b. Main Principle: Intentional Fallacy
i. An author’s intention (assuming it could be established) was not
necessarily a guide to a work’s meaning
ii. Author’s intention does not affect the work
c. Proponents: (wrote most popular essay entitled “The Intentional Fallacy”,
1946)
i. WK Wimsatt
ii. MC Beardsley
ii. Structuralism
1. Definition:
a. “…focuses on the conditions that make the meaning possible, rather than on
the meaning, itself.” (Bertens, 2008)
b. “…aims not to provide the interpretation of individual text, but to make explicit
in quasi-scientific term, the tacit grammar (the system of rules and codes)
that governs the meaning of all literary productions.” (Abrams, 1999)
i. Quasi-scientific: uses linguistics (scientific study of language which
involves the branches of semantics, etc.)
2. Pioneered by: Ferdinand de Saussure
a. language is arbitrary and conventional
b. Twofold or binary system (code and concept)
i. Code = symbol while concept = idea being conveyed by that symbol
(i.e. Traffic light: red = stop)
ii. The signifier and the signified.
3. Questions:
a. What is the underlying structure of the text?
i. Underlying structure = narrating technique
b. Are there patterns in the plot? What are these patterns?
4. Formalism VS Structuralism
©briebichara2016
a. Formalism – analyzes the small parts (figures of speech, symbols) parts of a
whole
b. Structuralism – analyzes the whole text / bigger picture
i. i.e. Movie – patterns: survival and/or death of characters
5. Proponent
a. Claude Levi-Strauss – particular instances in myths were manifestations of a
universal underlying structure
i. Vladimir – patterns in fairy tales
1. Heroes & heroines
a. Heroes: adventure, saving damsel in distress
6. May be synonymous with New Criticism but is still different
d. Class Struggle
i. Marxism – Economic Determinism
1. Definition:
a. Proposes that texts belong to a superstructure determined by the economic
base
i. Economic Status:
1. Aristocrats – nagmamay-ari / owns properties
2. Bourgeois / middle class
3. Proletarians / intellectual working class + masses (workers)
ii. i.e. Tatsulok – persona wishes to invert the pyramid wherein the mass
should be at the top
b. Suggests that to interpret cultural production is to relate the back to the base
2. Questions:
a. What is the economic status of the characters? What happens to them as a
result of this status? How do they fare against economic and political odds?
i. Did the poor / rich win? Did lack of opportunities lead to failure?
b. What other conditions stemming from their class does the writer emphasize
(e.g.: poor education, poor nutrition, and poor health care, inadequate
opportunity)?
c. To what extent does the text fail in terms of neglecting the economic
determinism that affect the work?
ii. Feminism - gender
1. Introduction
a. seeking empowerment and equality of rights of women
b. gender equality in terms of access to education, politics, etc.
c. Virginia Woolf:
i. a women should have a room of her own <so she can write, publish a
book and ought to be economically independent>
1. indicates own personal space
2. i.e. Shakespeare’s Sister
a. Judith Shakespeare – William’s twin
b. Perks of william: education, freedom, independence
i. Sumikat sa London. Became a famous
playwright
c. Judith: nasa bahay lang, helping the mom. Sinusunog
ng nanay ang libro kapag may binabasa. Ayaw niya
sa lalake na ikakasal sa kanya, inaabuso pa siya.
Walang nangyari sa kanya. Wanted to be an actrss
but it wasn’t part of her rights.
©briebichara2016
d. Simply separated by gender.
d. Beware of men who say they love women empowerment.
2. Definition: Champions the identity of women, demands for their rights, and promotes
women’s writings as representations of their experience
a. Uphold the idea of breaking the patriarchal system of the system
b. Men are above women in all aspects.
3. Questions:
a. How important are the female characters and how individual in their own
right? Are they credited with their own existence and their own character? In
their relationships with men, how are they treated?
i. Can the female characters stand on their own as women? Do the
females play a vital role in the story? If without them, will the story still
stand? Are they simply accessories thus not affecting the plot itself?
Are they empowered without the male characters? Relationship – are
they treated as trophies (object to be desired for popularity not out of
sincere love)? Are they put on a pedestal?
b. Are women characters given equal status with that of men?
c. How much interest do the male characters’ exhibit about women’s concerns?
i. Material concerns and emotional support to women?
iii. Queer Theory
1. The combined area of gay and lesbian studies and criticism, as well as theoretical
writings concerning all modes of variance (such as cross dressing) from the
normative model of biological sex, gender, identity, and sexual desires
©briebichara2016
i. Universal in theme, plot etc. but will differ in looks or names in
characters because of the cultures / background
b. How closely does the text match the archetype? What variations can be
seen? What meaning or meanings does the connection have?
f. Post-imperialism
i. Post Colonialism
1. Introduction
a. “After colonialism” --> after Western colonization
i. Primary source of economy in US: wars to sell weaponry
b. Study of countries after they were colonized
c. How we may be colonized:
i. Cultural imperialism
ii. Economic domination
d. Ie. Duterte issue – trying to break away from the colonizers
2. Definition: Aims to describe the meaning the mechanism of colonial power, to
recover excluded or marginalized “subaltern” voices, and to theorize the complexities
of colonial and postcolonial identity, national belonging, and globalization
a. Colonial power: Philippines : West = India & Africa : Britain
©briebichara2016
b. Subaltern – people on the margin, not in the center / the other / not being
focused on [As indios, we are the other.]
3. Most popular criticism – most of the text being written and published nowadays are
postcolonial
4. One of its branches: Orientalism – being manipulated by the West / superpowers
h. Deconstruction
ii. Usually of binary oppositions (i.e. light & day, man & women, western & oriental)
iv. As a literary theory, deconstructionism produces a type of analysis that stress ambiguity and
contradiction.
v. A major principle of deconstructionism is that Western though has been logocentric, that is,
Western philosophers have based their ideas on the assumption that central truth is
knowable and entire (this view is incorrect, according to a deconstructionist).
vi. The deconstructionist view posits instead that there is no central truth because
circumstances and time, which are changeable and sometimes arbitrary, govern the world of
the intellect. This analysis leads to the declaration “All interpretation is misinterpretation.”
That is, literary works cannot be encapsulated as organically unified entireties, and therefore
there is not one correct interpretation but only interpretations, each one possessing its own
validity.
©briebichara2016
ix. “Linguistic instability” means that the understanding of words can never be exact or
comprehensive because there is the never-ending play between the words in the text and
their many shades of meanings.
©briebichara2016
b. Tomas Pinpin (Ang Librong Pag-aaralan ng mga Tagalog ng Wikang Castilla,
1610)
c. Fernando Bagongbanta (the poet who contributed in in Memorial de la Vida
Cristiana, 1605)
ii. The vitality of the Euro-Hispanic aspects was still evident of the Filipino literary tradition was
still evident.
1. Amado V. Hernandez (novels Luha ng Buwaya, Mga Ibong Mandaragit,poem Isang
Dipang Langit)
2. Lazaro M. Francisco ( novel Bayang Nagpatiwakal) Alejandro J. Abadilla (poem Ako
ang Daigdig)
iii. Short stories in Tagalog were sponsored and published by the Japanese during the war
years. (25 Pinakamabubuting Maikling Kwento ng Taong 1943)
iv. Other writers who emerged:
1. Genoveva Edroza Matute (Ako’y Isang Tinig, a collection of short stories) Kerima
Polotan (Stories, a collection of short story)
2. Rolando S. Tinio (playwright who translated into Filipino Death of a salesman, Miss
Julie, and Waiting For Godot)
v. Poets writing in English found themselves torn between Philippine social reality and
art
1. Carlos Angeles (A Stun of Jewels, a collection of poem)
2. Emmanuel S. Torres (Angels and Fugitives, Shapes of Silence, collections of poem)
vi. The Filipino novelists in English used the themes and techniques from Western novels
cannot get away from lived life in the Philippines.
1. Nick Joaquin (The Woman Who Had Two Navels
2. NVM Gonzales (Season of Grace, The Bamboo Dancers)
e. After EDSA
i. Edsa – educator, philanthropist, contributed s lot to music, etc. one of the first intellectuals of
the Philippines
ii. The post –EDSA centers for creative writing may be grouped into two:
1. academic institutions
2. writer’s organizations
iii. A post-EDSA state sponsored institution, the NCCA (National Commission for the Culture
and the Arts) was created
VIII. Poetry
a. Poetry may be distinguished from prose in terms of form by its compression, by its frequent (though
not prescribed) employment of the conventions of meter and rhyme and by its reliance upon the line
as a formal unit, by its heightened vocabulary and by its freedom of syntax. The characteristic of
emotional content of poetry finds expression through a variety of techniques. One of the most
©briebichara2016
ancient and universal of these techniques is the use of metaphor and simile to alter and expand the
readers’s imaginative apprehension through implicit or explicit comparison.
i. Ophelia Alcantara-Dimalanta (2003)
b. Elements
i. Sound (Sound and musical devices differentiate poetry from prose)
1. Rhyme – regular recurrence of similar sounds usually at the end of the line
2. Rhythm
a. Beat in music
b. Recurrence of pattern of sound
c. Result of systematically stressing / accenting words & syllables
3. Meter
a. Built up of a regular occurrence of accents whether word or rhetorical
accents
b. Poetic foot
i. Unit which is repeated with the presence of accented or unaccented
syllables (stressed and unstressed syllables)
ii. Kinds:
1. Iambic – unstressed + stressed
2. Trochaic – stressed + unstressed
3. Anapestic – two unstressed syllables + stress
iii. Spondaic – two successive stressed syllables
4. Repetition
a. Alliteration – repetition of initial consonant sound
b. Consonance – repetition of internal (middle) consonant sound
c. Assonance – repetition of the vowel sounds
d. Parallelism – repetition of grammatical patterns
5. Onomatopoeia
ii. Imagery – use of figurative language, evokes our senses, mental pictures / verbal
representations that concretize what we are describing
iii. Theme - general idea, often about the human experience that it wants to share with the
audience
iv. Figurative Language
1. Tropes - use of words or phrases are a way that effects a conspicuous change in
what we take to be their standard or literal meaning
2. Figures of Speech - departure from the standard usage is not primarily on the
meanings of the meaning the word, but in order of syntactical pattern of the words
b. Metaphor - is the use of word or expression that in literal usage denotes one
kind of thing is applied to a distinctly different kind of thing without asserting a
comparison
i. Parts:
1. Tenor – subject of comparison
2. Vehicle – object which owns the attribute character
ii. i.e.
©briebichara2016
Drinker of horizon’s fluid (Stephen Spender)
1. “Eye”- Tenor
v. Allusion
2. Refers to a textual, leaving the reader to figure out the connection between the
current work and work being referred to
3. Types:
a. Historical
vi. Negative Capability – capability to be face to face with uncertainty and not need to grapple
what uncertainty could mean but be comfortable just facing the situation
c. Analysis of a Poem
i. Literal Text – something that relates to dramatic situation or what is happening in the poem
ii. Metaphorical Text – literal dramatic … figurative art …
d. First Poem: Mayon
i. Persona: Tourist/Traveler
1. Evidences: Holding a camera, postcard, retrato sa Cagsawa (souvenir shop)
ii. Dominant: Allusion & Imagery
1. Allusion: pana ni Pagtuga
2. Imagery:
a. Dalagang Namatay: Cemetery of Lovers = Image of Death
b. Lumulusaw na tae: Dirty / Will burn you = Image of Destruction
c. Manganganak … : Waiting for the explosion
i. The use of the term manganganak instead of sasabog shows the
literariness of the text.
iii. Theme: Talks about the destructiveness hidden behind beauty of the Mayon
iv. Negative Capability: Very beautiful and picturesque but destructive
e. Second Poem: The Haiyan Dead
f. Third Poem: Stonehenge
i. Structure: couplet form
ii. Dominant: Allusion
1. Proteus
2. Poet-king = Philosopher (original), God of Mountain (Function)
g. Fourth Poem: XVIII, From “AmsterdAm: A CyCle”
©briebichara2016
i. DOMINANT:
1. Synecdoche:
a. the Creoles, the Natives, the Others = the colonized
b. cinnamons, their diamonds, … = our wealth
2. Metonymy: the Empire = the colonizer
©briebichara2016