Case # 1 Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Petitioner Spouses Romeo and Regina Capanzana, Respondents

CASE # 1
OUR LADY OF LOURDES HOSPITAL, Petitioner

vs
SPOUSES ROMEO AND REGINA CAPANZANA, Respondents
Regina Capanzana (Regina), a 40-year-old nurse and clinical instructor pregnant with her third child, was
scheduled for her third caesarean section (C-section) on 2 January 1998. However, a week earlier, on 26
December 1997, she went into active labor and was brought to petitioner hospital for an emergency C-
section. She first underwent a preoperative physical examination by Dr. Miriam Ramos 4 (Dr. Ramos) and
Dr. Milagros Joyce Santos,5 (Dr. Santos) the same attending physicians in her prior childbirths. She was
found fit for anesthesia after she responded negatively to questions about tuberculosis, rheumatic fever,
and cardiac diseases. On that same day, she gave birth to a baby boy. When her condition stabilized, she
was discharged from the recovery room and transferred to a regular hospital room. 6
At 2:30 a.m. the following day, or 13 hours after her operation, Regina who was then under watch by her
niece, Katherine L. Balad (Balad), complained of a headache, a chilly sensation, restlessness, and
shortness of breath. She asked for oxygen and later became cyanotic. After undergoing an x-ray, she was
found to be suffering from pulmonary edema. She was eventually transferred to the Intensive Care Unit,
where she was hooked to a mechanical ventilator. The impression then was that she was showing signs of
amniotic fluid embolism.7
On 2 January 1998, when her condition still showed no improvement, Regina was transferred to the
Cardinal Santos Hospital. The doctors thereat found that she was suffering from rheumatic heart disease
mitral stenosis with mild pulmonary hypertension, which contributed to the onset of fluid in her lung
tissue (pulmonary edema). This development resulted in cardiopulmonary arrest and, subsequently, brain
damage. Regina lost the use of her speech, eyesight, hearing and limbs. She was discharged, still in a
vegetative state, on 19January 1998.8
Respondent spouses Capanzana filed a complaint for damages 9 against petitioner hospital, along with co-
defendants: Dr. Miriam Ramos, an obstetrician/gynecologist; Dr. Milagros Joyce Santos, an
anesthesiologist; and Jane Does, the nurses on duty stationed on the second floor of petitioner hospital on
26-27 December 1997.10
Respondents imputed negligence to Drs. Ramos and Santos for the latter's failure to detect the heart
disease of Regina, resulting in failure not only to refer her to a cardiologist for cardiac clearance, but also
to provide the appropriate medical management before, during, and after the operation. They further
stated that the nurses were negligent for not having promptly given oxygen, and that the hospital was
equally negligent for not making available and accessible the oxygen unit on that same hospital floor at
the time.11
They prayed for actual damages amounting to ₱514,645.80; compensatory damages, ₱3,4 l6,278.40;
moral damages, ₱5,000,000; exemplary damages, ₱2,000,000; attorney's fees, ₱500,000 as well as ₱5,000
per hearing and the costs of suit. They likewise prayed for other just and equitable reliefs. 12
Petitioner hospital, defendants Dr. Ramos and Dr. Santos filed their respective Answers. 13 On the other
hand, the service of summons on the nurses was unsuccessful, as they were no longer connected with the
hospital. Thus, only defendant Fiorita Ballano (Ballano), who was later proven to be a midwife and not a
nurse, filed her Answer.14
Petitioner hospital and defendant Ballano claimed that there was no instruction to the hospital or the staff
to place Regina in a room with a standby oxygen tank. They also claimed that the nurses on duty had
promptly attended to her needs. They prayed that the complaint be dismissed and respondent3 ordered to
pay unpaid medical bills.15
Meanwhile, defendant Dr. Ramos claimed that in all of the consultations and prenatal check-ups of
Regina in the latter's three pregnancies, she never complained nor informed the doctor of any symptom or
sign of a heart problem. Before the last C-section of Regina, Dr. Ramos examined her and found no
abnormal cardiac sound, murmur or sign of rheumatic heart ailment. The doctor further claimed that since
the operation was an emergency, she had no time or chance to have Regina undergo any cardiac
examination and secure a cardiac clearance. Moreover, Dr. Ramos claimed that the cardio-pulmonary
arrest took place 14 hours after the operation, long after she had performed the operation. She prayed that
judgment be rendered ordering spouses Capanzana to pay her moral damages amounting to ₱500,000;
exemplary damages, ₱200,000; and attorney's fees, ₱l00,000. 16
On the other hand, defendant Dr. Santos claimed that she was the anesthesiologist in Regina's first and
second childbirths via C-section. The doctor further stated that prior to the third emergency C-section, she
conducted a pre-operative evaluation, and Regina showed no sign or symptom of any heart problem or
abnormality in the latter's cardiovascular, respiratory, or central nervous systems. She then administered
the anesthesia to Regina. She also stated that Regina's condition before, during, and after the operation
was stable. Dr. Santos prayed that the complaint against her be dismissed. 17
Trial ensued. Plaintiffs presented Dr. Erwin Dizon, a cardiologist; Dr. Godfrey Robeniol, a neurologist;
Mrs. Elizabeth Tayag; Dr. Eleonor Lopez, a cardiologist; Kathleen Lucero Balad; Romeo Capanzana; and
Dr. Asuncion Ranezes, a physician.18
After the plaintiffs rested their case, an amended complaint was filed, this time identifying and
impleading as defendants the nurses on duty who included Czarina Ocampo, H.R. Bolatete, Evelyn S.
David, and Angelica Concepcion.19 After conducting a deposition of the person in charge of the nurses'
schedule, spouses Capanzana further amended their complaint to implead nurses Rochelle Padolina and
Fiorita Ballano, while dropping defendants Czarina Ocampo, H.R. Bolatete, and Angelica Concepcion. 20
The trial continued with the presentation of defense evidence. The defense presented Dr. Santos; Dr.
Ramos; Atty. Nicolas Lutero III, director of the Bureau of Licensing and Facilities of the Department of
Health; Lourdes H. Nicolas, the assistant nursing service director; Dr. Grace de los Angeles; Ma. Selerina
Cuvin, the account receivable clerk; and Milagros de Vera, the administrative supervisor of the hospital. 21
On 11 May 2005, and pending the resolution of the case before the trial court, Regina died and was
substituted by her heirs represented by Romeo Capanzana. 22

Case # 1 Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Petitioner Spouses Romeo and Regina Capanzana, Respondents

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Case # 1 Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Petitioner Spouses Romeo and Regina Capanzana, Respondents

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Case # 1 Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Petitioner Spouses Romeo and Regina Capanzana, Respondents

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CASE # 1

OUR LADY OF LOURDES HOSPITAL, Petitioner

You might also like