Rayat Shikshan Sanstha’s

Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil Polytechnic, Satara

Micro-Project Report
On
1. “welding and types of welding”
Presented By
Roll No Name of Student
601 Bhandirge Omkar Balasaheb
602 Chavan Aditya Vikas
603 Deshmukh Sanket Tanaji
604 Dhanawade Vedant Sandip

Program: Diploma in MECHANICAL Engineering

Class: FYME Year ( Semester : I)
Course: ( Subject Code: )

Guided By
Prof. vaishali mam

Mechanical Engineering Department

[2021-22]
 Rayat Shikshan Sanstha’s
Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil Polytechnic, Satara

CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that
Mr / Miss Bhandirge Omkar Balasaheb
Mr / Miss Chavan Aditya Vikas
Mr / Miss Deshmukh Sanket Tanaji
Mr / Miss Dhanawade Vedant Sandip
Mr / Miss

of Year (Semester I) have successfully completed the Micro-Project work entitled

“ ” in the Course
of Program Diploma in
Engineering of

Maharashtra State of Technical Education, Mumbai, Maharashtra State.

Prof. Prof. Prin Dr.Shaikh K.C.

Guide Head of Department Principal

Date:
Place:
 Undertaking by Students
We will preserve micro-project and the report in our custody till end of completion of
our program. We assure that we will produce the same whenever we or anybody from our
group will be asked to produce it without fail.

Sr. Roll Name of Student Mobile No. Signature

No. No.
1
2
3
4
5
 Annexure – I A

Part A – Plan (About 2-3 pages)

Format for Micro-Project Proposal (For 1st to 4th Semester)
Title of Micro-Project
1.0 Brief Introduction: ( Importance of the project, in about 4 to 5 sentences )

2.0 Aim of the Micro-Project (in about 4 to 5 sentences )

This Micro-Project aims at

b
c
d
3.0 Action Plan ( Sequence and time required for major activities for 8 weeks )

Sr. Planned Planned Name of Responsible

Details of Activity
No. Start date Finish date Team Members
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
4.0 Resources Requires ( Major resources such as raw materials, some machining facility, software etc )

Sr.
Name of resource / material Specification Quantity Remarks
No.
1
2
3

*********
 Annexure – II A

Part B – Outcome after Execution

Format for Micro-Project Report (About 6-10 pages)

For 1st to 4th Semester

Title of Micro-Project
1.0 Brief Description: ( Importance of the project, in about 100 to 200 words )

2.0 Aim of the Micro-Project ( in about 100 to 200 words )

This Micro-Project aims at

3.0 Course Outcome Integrated

(Add to the earlier list if more COs are addressed)

4.0 Actual Procedure Followed

Write the step wise the work was done, including which team member did what work and how the data
was analysed. (if any)
 Actual Resources Used
( Mention the actual resources used )

Sr.
Name of resource / material Specification Quantity Remarks
No.
1
2
3

5.0 Output of the Micro-Project

(Drawing of the prototype, drawing of survey, presentation of collection of data, findings etc)

Skill developed / Learning out of the Micro-Project

(in about 150 to 200 words)

*********
 Annexure – III

Teacher Evaluation Sheet

Name of Student: Enrollment No.:

Semester:
Name of Program :

Course Title: Code:

Title of the Micro-Project:

Course Outcomes Achieved:

Evaluation as per suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro-Project

(Please tick in appropriate cell for each characteristic)

Poor Average Good Excellent

Sr. Characteristic to be
( Marks 1 -3 ( Marks 4 -5 ( Marks 6 -8 ( Marks 9 -
No. assessed
) ) ) 10)
1 Relevance to the course
2 Literature survey /
Information collected
3 Project Proposal
4 Completion of target as
per project proposal
5 Analysis of data and
representation
6 Quality of prototype /
Model
7 Report Preparation
8 Presentation
9 Defense
 Micro-Project Evaluation Sheet
Process assessment Product assessment Total Marks

10
Part A Project Part B Individual
Project Methodology Project Report / Presentation
Proposal ( 2 marks ) Working Model / Viva
( 2 marks ) ( 2 marks ) ( 4 marks)

Note: Every course teacher is expected to assign marks for group evolution in first 3 columns and
individual evolution in 4th column for each group of students as per suggested rubrics.

Comments / suggestion about team work / leadership / inter-personal communication (if any):

Any other Comment:

Name and designation of faculty member:

Signature:
Guidelines for report:
1) Paper Size: A4
2) Font name: Calibri
3) Font size: 12 points (excluding cover page and initial pages)
4) Margins (Top, Bottom, Left, Right) : 2.5 cm
5) Line spacing: 1.2
6) Black and White printing (No colour printing)
 Suggested Rubric for Assessment of Micro-Project
Sr. Characteristic to be Poor Average Good Excellent
No. assessed ( Marks 1 -3 ) ( Marks 4 -5 ) ( Marks 6 -8 ) ( Marks 9 -10)
1 Relevance to the course Relate to very Relate to very Take care of Take care of
few LOs few LOs at-least one CO more than one
CO
2 Literature survey / Not more than At-least 5 At-least 7 At-least 10
Information collected two sources relevant relevant relevant
(primary and sources, at sources, most sources, most
secondary), least 2 latest. latest. latest.
very old
reference
3 Project Proposal Poor Satisfactory Good Excellent
4 Completion of target as Completed less Completed n Completed n Completed
per project proposal than 50% 50 to 60% 60 to 80% more than 80%
5 Analysis of data and Sample size Sufficient and Sufficient and Enough data
representation small, data appropriate appropriate collected by
neither sample, sample, sufficient and
organised nor enough data enough data appropriate
presented well. generated but generated sample size.
not organised which is Proper
and not well organised but inferences
present. poor inferences drawn by
drawn. organising and
presenting data
through tables,
charts and
graphs.
6 Quality of prototype / Incomplete Just assembled Well Well
Model fabrication / / fabricated and assembled / assembled /
assembly. parts are not fabricated with fabricated with
functioning proper proper
well. Not in functioning functioning
proper shape, parts. In proper parts. In proper
dimensions shape, within shape, within
beyond tolerance tolerance
tolerance limit. dimensions and dimensions and
Appearance / good finish / good finish /
finish is appearance. appearance.
shabby. But no Creativity in
creativity in design and use
design and use of material.
of material.
7 Report Preparation Very short, Nearly Detailed Very detailed
poor quality sufficient and correct and correct, clear
correct details clear description of
about methods, description of methods,
 materials, methods, materials,
precautions materials, precautions.
and precautions. and
conclusion, but and conclusion,
clarity is not conclusion, Enough tables,
there in Sufficient charts and
presentation. graphic sketches.
But not enough description.
graphic
description.
8 Presentation Major Includes major Includes major Well organized
information is information but information includes major
not included, not well and well information,
information is organized and organized but well
not well presented well. not presented presented.
organized. well.
9 Defense Could not Replied to Replied Replied most
reply to considerable properly to of the
considerable number of considerable questions
number of questions but number of properly.
question. not very questions.
properly.