Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 33 views

    Teacher's Scoring Rubric: Video Project

    Uploaded by

    Hope Dadivas
    This rubric outlines the criteria and scoring for a teacher to evaluate student video projects. It assesses elements such as concept development, content organization, video quality, teamwork, and timeliness. Students can earn up to 25 points in each category by demonstrating clear goals and contributions for each member. Well-edited videos with a coherent theme and properly cited sources receive higher scores than unfinished or disorganized projects. Meeting deadlines and equitable participation are also evaluated.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Teacher's Scoring Rubric: Video Project

    Uploaded by

    Hope Dadivas
    33 views3 pages
    This rubric outlines the criteria and scoring for a teacher to evaluate student video projects. It assesses elements such as concept development, content organization, video quality, teamwork, and timeliness. Students can earn up to 25 points in each category by demonstrating clear goals and contributions for each member. Well-edited videos with a coherent theme and properly cited sources receive higher scores than unfinished or disorganized projects. Meeting deadlines and equitable participation are also evaluated.

    Original Description:

    VIDEO-PROJECT-Scoring-Rubric

    Original Title

    VIDEO PROJECT

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This rubric outlines the criteria and scoring for a teacher to evaluate student video projects. It assesses elements such as concept development, content organization, video quality, teamwork, and timeliness. Students can earn up to 25 points in each category by demonstrating clear goals and contributions for each member. Well-edited videos with a coherent theme and properly cited sources receive higher scores than unfinished or disorganized projects. Meeting deadlines and equitable participation are also evaluated.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    33 views3 pages

    Teacher's Scoring Rubric: Video Project

    Uploaded by

    Hope Dadivas
    This rubric outlines the criteria and scoring for a teacher to evaluate student video projects. It assesses elements such as concept development, content organization, video quality, teamwork, and timeliness. Students can earn up to 25 points in each category by demonstrating clear goals and contributions for each member. Well-edited videos with a coherent theme and properly cited sources receive higher scores than unfinished or disorganized projects. Meeting deadlines and equitable participation are also evaluated.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    VIDEO PROJECT

    Teacher’s Scoring Rubric

    ACTIVITY Exemplary Proficient Partially Proficient Incomplete POINTS

    Concept 20-25 points 14-19 points 7-13 points 0-6 points

    The concept describes a The concept describes a The team has Little effort has been
    clear picture of what relatively clear picture of brainstormed their spent on
    students are trying to what they are trying to concept but has no brainstorming and
    achieve including an achieve including what clear focus. refining a concept.
    adequate description of the team is trying to do Goals/final product The team appears
    what they are trying to do overall but without are not clearly unclear on their goals
    and generally how each specifics on how each defined. and how the project
    team member’s work will team member’s work will objectives will be met.
    contribute to contribute to the final
    the final project. project.

    Content/ 20-25 points 14-19 points 7-13 points 0-6 points


    Organization
    The content includes a clear Information presented is The project does not Content lacks a
    statement of purpose or a present a clearly central theme, clear
    theme and is creative, connected theme with stated theme, is point of view and/or
    compelling, and clearly accurate and vague, and/or some of logical sequence of
    written. A rich variety of current supporting the supporting information. Much of
    supporting information in information contributing information does not the supporting
    the video contributes to the to understanding of the seem to fit the main information is
    understanding of the project’s main idea. idea. Citations and irrelevant to the
    project’s main idea. Events Details are logical and facts are minimal. overall message.
    and messages are persuasive information is The viewer is unsure
    presented in a logical order. used effectively. The what the message is.
    Includes properly cited content includes a clear Information is
    sources. point of view with a incorrect, out of date,
    progression of ideas and or incomplete. No
    supporting information. citations included.
    Includes
    properly cited sources.

    Quality 15-20 points 9-14 points 5-8 points 0-4 points

    The video project was Video was completed and Video was produced There was no video,
    completed and included contained many of the but had very little or video was unedited
    most of the suggested suggested elements. editing. Many poor- without transitions or
    elements. The video was Editing was incomplete or quality shots remain. audio support.
    well edited and moves poorly done. Some poor Video was fragmented
    smoothly from scene to shots remain. Video is still and choppy with little
    scene with proper use of somewhat choppy. Audio to no audio
    transitions. and other enhancements reinforcement.
    Audio was clear and were utilized, but not for
    understandable and other maximum effect.
    enhancements were well
    used.

    Teamwork 12-15 points 8-11 points 4-7 points 0-3 points

    Students met and had Students met and had Minimal team Meetings were not
    discussions regularly. All discussions regularly. meetings were held. held and/or not all of
    students on the team Most of the students on Most of the students the team members
    contributed to the the team contributed to on the team contributed to the
    discussion and were part of the discussion and were contributed, but most project. Teamwork
    the final project. Team part of the final project. of the work was done was not evident.
    members showed respect Team members mostly by one or two.
    to one another. showed respect toward
    each other.

    Timeliness 12-15 points 8-11 points 4-7 points 0-3 points

    All project deadlines were Most project deadlines Many project Deadlines were
    met. were met. Those that deadlines were not disregarded,
    were late did not have met, negatively having a significant
    significant impact on the impacting the finished impact on the final
    finished project. project. project.
    Final Score

    You might also like