HW9 Sols
HW9 Sols
HW9 Sols
1. Munkres 26.12
Solution:
Lemma 1. Let p X Y be a closed map. Suppose y > Y, and suppose U is an open set in X
containing p−1 (y). Then there exists an open set W in Y containing y such that p−1 (W) b U.
Proof. Consider U c . This is a closed set, so p(U c ) is closed. Moreover, since p−1 (y) b U, we
have y ~i np(U c ). Let W be any open set in Y such that y > W b (p(U c ))c . Then
p−1 (W) b p−1 ((p(U c ))c ) = (p−1 (p(U c )))c .
But p−1 (p(U c )) a U c , so (p−1 (p(U c )))c b (U c )c = U. Hence p−1 (W) b U, as required.
Solution:
Suppose p X Y be a closed surjective perfect map, and suppose Y is compact. We want
to show that X is compact, so let Uα be an open cover of X. For every y > Y we have
p−1 (y) is compact, so there exists a finite subcover C y of p−1 (y). By the lemma there exists
an open set Wy such that y > Wy and p−1 (Wy ) b 8U>C y U. Since Y is compact, we can cover
Y with finitely many sets Wy k (this step uses the fact that p is surjective). But then the union
8C y k is a finite subcover of X.
2. Munkres 29.5
Solution:
Let X and Y be homeomorphic locally compact Hausdorff spaces, with ϕ being a home-
omorphism. Let ϕ be the extension to X such that ϕ(X ) = Y . We claim that ϕ is
continuous. If U b Y is open, and if Y >~ U, then (ϕ )−1 (U) = ϕ−1 (U), which is open in X
and hence open in X . On the other hand, if Y > U, then U c = K, where K is compact in
Y. But then
((ϕ )−1 (U))c = (ϕ )−1 (U c ) = (ϕ )−1 (K) = (ϕ)−1 (K)
which is compact in X since ϕ−1 is continuous. Hence (ϕ )−1 (U) is open in X. Hence ϕ is
continuous. Since it is a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space, it
is a homeomorphism.
3. Munkres 29.6 The following lemma will be handy for the following problems.
Lemma 2. If X is a compact Hausdorff space and U = X − p for some p > X, then U is
homeomorphic to X.
Proof. Define ϕ U X by ϕ(x) = x for x x , and ϕ() = p. This is clearly a bijection
from a compact space to a Hausdorff space, so to show it is a homeomorphism, we need only
show it is continuous. Clearly if V is open in X and does not contain p, then ϕ−1 (V ) = V
which is open in U. On the other hand, if V is open in X and contains p, then V c is compact
in X and contained in U, and hence compact in U. But then ϕ−1 (V c ) is compact in U. But
then
ϕ−1 (V ) = (ϕ−1 (V c ))c
which is the complement of a compact set in U and therefore an open set in U . Hence ϕ is
continuous.
Math F651: Homework 9 Solutions April 6, 2007
Solution:
Since R is homeomorphic to (0, 2π), it is enough to show that the one point compactification
is homeomorphic to S 1 . Define ϕ (−π, π) S 1 by ϕ(x) = e 2πix . This map is clearly clearly
injective, and is surjective onto S 1 (−1, 0). Moreover, the branch of ln with branch cut
along then negative real axis is a continuous function and, when restricted to S 1 (−1, 0)
is the inverse function of ϕ. Hence (−π, π) is homeomorphic to S 1 (−1, 0). Since S 1 is
a compact Hausdorff space, we conclude that the one point compactification of (−π, π) is
homeomorphic to S 1 .
4. Munkres 29.8
Solution:
Define f R+ R+ by f (x) = 1~x. This is a homeomorphism (it is continuous and is its
own inverse). Let A = f (Z+ ). Then A is homeomorphic to Z+ and is 1~n n > Z+ . Let
Y =08A
This is a closed and bounded subset of R and is hence compact. It is also a Hausdorff space.
Therefore the one point compactification of A is homeomorphic to Y, and hence the one
point compactification of Z+ is homeomorphic to Y.
5.
Solution, part a:
For each x > M, there is an open set U x that is homeomorphic to Rn via a homeomorphism
ϕ x taking x to 0. Let K = ϕ−1
x (B1 (0)). Since B1 (0) is compact in R we have K is compact in
n
2
Math F651: Homework 9 Solutions April 6, 2007
show that M is locally Euclidean if and only if there is an precompact open subset V b
M such that M V is homeomorphic to Rn B1 (0). Finally, every point in M 9 M is
contained in an open (in M and therefore in M ) set that is homeomorphic to Rn . Hence
we have reduced the problem to showing that has a neighbourhood homeomorphic to Rn
if and only if if and only if there is an precompact open subset V b M such that M V is
homeomorphic to Rn B1 (0).
Suppose such a set V exists. Let Y = 0M V . Then Y is homeomorphic to Rn B1 (0), which
2
is homeomorphic to the closed punctured ball B1 (0) 0 via the map x ( x~ SxS . Since
B1 (0) is compact, we conclude that the one-point compactification of Y is homeomorphic
to B1 (0) by a homeomorphism taking Y to 0. s Let K = M V . This is a closed set in M
and is hence compact. Since Y is homeomorphic to (M V ) M we conclude that Y
is homeomorphic to M V by a homeomorphism taking Y to M .
Composing homeomorphisms, we conclude that there is a homeomorphism ϕ from M V
to B1 (0) taking M to 0.
Let W = M V̄ . This set is open in M and contained in M V . It is therefore open
in M V . Hence ϕ(W) is an open set in B1 (0) that contains 0, and hence contains some
Bє (0). Let U = ϕ−1 (Bє (0)). This set is in M V̄ and is contained in W. Since W is open in
M , we conclude that U is open in M . But U is homeomorphic to Bє (0) (by ϕ restricted to
U) and hence M has a neighbourhood that is homeomorphic to and open subset of Rn .
Conversely, suppose that M is locally Euclidean. Let U be an open set in M that contains
and is homeomorphic to Rn by a homeomorphism ϕ. Without loss of generality we can
assume that ϕ() = 0. Let W = ϕ−1 (Rn B1 (0). This is an open set in U and hence open
in M . It does not contain , so it is also open in M. Let V = (M U) 8 W. This is an
open subset of M. All the limit points of V in M must be in U, since V contains M U.
But it is easy to see that these are exactly ϕ−1 (S n−1 . Hence the closure of V in M must be
(M U) 8 ϕ−1 (Rn B1 (0). This is compact, since its complement is ϕ−1 (B1 (0)), which is
an open subset of . Hence V is a precompact open neighbourhood in M , and its closure
does not contain . Hence it is a precompact open neighbourhood in M, and M V is
homeomorphic to B1 (0) 0 which is homeomorphic to Rn B1 (0). So V is the set we seek.
3
Math F651: Homework 9 Solutions April 6, 2007
H̄ = H̄ c L h (H) = L h (H̄).
Since h > H̄ is arbitrary, we conclude that the product of two elements of H̄ is again in H̄.
Now inversion ι G G, which is a homeomorphism. Then
ι(H̄) = ι(H) = H̄